Re: [Callers] Identifying Dances (Was "Anyone know this dance?"]
>From Dizzy Dances II: [image: Inline image 1] On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:08 AM Michael Dyck via Callers < callers@lists.sharedweight.net> wrote: > On 15-11-25 04:15 AM, Jeremy Gmail via Callers wrote: > > > > I’ll post my “unknown” dances over time so as not to overwhelm the list. > > > > Here’s the first: > > > > 1s Improper > > > > Down hall 4-in-line (1's in the middle), Don't turn around, back-up a few > > steps, 1s arch while 2s go under to new couple (8) > > > > Dosido the one you meet, Pass by and swing the next > > > > Pass thru across set Right shoulder with Partner, turn alone; In normal > > couples R&L thru across > > > > LLFB, 1s Swing in middle > > That's "Contra Madness" by Gene Hubert. It appears in Dizzy Dances I and > II, > but not on the web (as far as I know). > > -Michael > > > ___ > Callers mailing list > Callers@lists.sharedweight.net > http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net >
Re: [Callers] Identifying Dances (Was "Anyone know this dance?"]
On 15-11-25 04:15 AM, Jeremy Gmail via Callers wrote: I’ll post my “unknown” dances over time so as not to overwhelm the list. Here’s the first: 1s Improper Down hall 4-in-line (1's in the middle), Don't turn around, back-up a few steps, 1s arch while 2s go under to new couple (8) Dosido the one you meet, Pass by and swing the next Pass thru across set Right shoulder with Partner, turn alone; In normal couples R&L thru across LLFB, 1s Swing in middle That's "Contra Madness" by Gene Hubert. It appears in Dizzy Dances I and II, but not on the web (as far as I know). -Michael
Re: [Callers] Identifying Dances (Was "Anyone know this dance?"]
Thanks Everyone – I seem to be trying to solve a problem that doesn’t exist (or maybe it’s just me that has it). I’ll post my “unknown” dances over time so as not to overwhelm the list. Here’s the first: 1s Improper Down hall 4-in-line (1's in the middle), Don't turn around, back-up a few steps, 1s arch while 2s go under to new couple (8) Dosido the one you meet, Pass by and swing the next Pass thru across set Right shoulder with Partner, turn alone; In normal couples R&L thru across LLFB, 1s Swing in middle Thanks Jeremy From: Callers [mailto:callers-boun...@lists.sharedweight.net] On Behalf Of Laur via Callers Sent: 25 November 2015 04:17 To: Winston, Alan P.; Paul Wilde via Callers Cc: callers@lists.sharedweight.net Subject: Re: [Callers] Identifying Dances (Was "Anyone know this dance?"] I agree with Paul. I find this a great part of our forum and easily identifiable. Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad <https://yho.com/footer0> On Tuesday, November 24, 2015, 10:56 PM, Paul Wilde via Callers wrote: I am happy w/ the present system whereby identifying requests/ answers are part of the regular forum. Thanks, Paul First of all, I think making changes is a bit premature -- nobody AFAIK is complaining about the current stream of requests. That said, Mailman has the ability to create "virtual" mailing lists called topics: https://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-member/node29.html It would be straightforward -- once we agree on any topic names -- for Seth/Chris to implement topic filtering. Aahz speaks for me on this. I don't find the current level any problem at all, and a sub-list tag wouldn't be a problem either. -- Alan ___ Callers mailing list Callers@lists.sharedweight.net http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
Re: [Callers] Identifying Dances (Was "Anyone know this dance?"]
blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px
#715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white
!important; } I agree with Paul. I find this a great part of our forum and
easily identifiable.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad
On Tuesday, November 24, 2015, 10:56 PM, Paul Wilde via Callers
wrote:
I am happy w/ the present system whereby identifying requests/ answers are part
of the regular forum.
Thanks,Paul
First of all, I think making changes is a bit premature -- nobody AFAIK
is complaining about the current stream of requests. That said, Mailman
has the ability to create "virtual" mailing lists called topics:
https://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-member/node29.html
It would be straightforward -- once we agree on any topic names -- for
Seth/Chris to implement topic filtering.
Aahz speaks for me on this. I don't find the current level any problem at all,
and a sub-list tag
wouldn't be a problem either.
-- Alan
___
Callers mailing list
Callers@lists.sharedweight.net
http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
Re: [Callers] Identifying Dances (Was "Anyone know this dance?"]
I am happy w/ the present system whereby identifying requests/ answers are part of the regular forum. Thanks, Paul > First of all, I think making changes is a bit premature -- nobody AFAIK >> is complaining about the current stream of requests. That said, Mailman >> has the ability to create "virtual" mailing lists called topics: >> >> https://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-member/node29.html >> >> It would be straightforward -- once we agree on any topic names -- for >> Seth/Chris to implement topic filtering. >> > > Aahz speaks for me on this. I don't find the current level any problem at > all, and a sub-list tag > wouldn't be a problem either. > > -- Alan
Re: [Callers] Identifying Dances (Was "Anyone know this dance?"]
On 11/24/2015 3:47 PM, Aahz Maruch via Callers wrote: On Tue, Nov 24, 2015, Jeremy Gmail via Callers wrote: So what can we do? We could all ask on [Callers] but we'd soon get fed up with the forum being taken over. I wondered about a "please identify this dance" (sub-)forum, similar to the many "ask the expert" forums (fora?) you see in the IT community. Do members have any thoughts about this? Will it work? How do we get people on it? What are the issues? Is there a batter / alternative approach? First of all, I think making changes is a bit premature -- nobody AFAIK is complaining about the current stream of requests. That said, Mailman has the ability to create "virtual" mailing lists called topics: https://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-member/node29.html It would be straightforward -- once we agree on any topic names -- for Seth/Chris to implement topic filtering. Aahz speaks for me on this. I don't find the current level any problem at all, and a sub-list tag wouldn't be a problem either. -- Alan
Re: [Callers] Identifying Dances (Was "Anyone know this dance?"]
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015, Jeremy Gmail via Callers wrote: > > So what can we do? We could all ask on [Callers] but we'd soon get > fed up with the forum being taken over. I wondered about a "please > identify this dance" (sub-)forum, similar to the many "ask the expert" > forums (fora?) you see in the IT community. > > Do members have any thoughts about this? Will it work? How do we get > people on it? What are the issues? Is there a batter / alternative > approach? First of all, I think making changes is a bit premature -- nobody AFAIK is complaining about the current stream of requests. That said, Mailman has the ability to create "virtual" mailing lists called topics: https://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-member/node29.html It would be straightforward -- once we agree on any topic names -- for Seth/Chris to implement topic filtering. -- Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6http://rule6.info/ <*> <*> <*> Help a hearing-impaired person: http://rule6.info/hearing.html
