I'd like to see a plugin that makes available to JS a function to execute ocaml
bytecode. There could be a standard way to check for support, and the pure
javascript interpreter could be loaded if it is missing (for those
browsers/computers on which performance is reasonable).
--- On Tue, 11/18/08, Vincent Balat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Vincent Balat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [announce] O'Browser : OCaml on browsers
> To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2008, 10:32 AM
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday 18 November 2008 19:15:28 Kuba Ober wrote:
> > On Tuesday 18 November 2008, you wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 22:43 -0500, Kuba Ober
> wrote:
> > > > > Please note that this is an early
> version, in particular the DOM
> > > > > interface module is neither pretty nor
> well typed.
> > > > > However, it can already be used to
> create little applets or scripts
> > > > > (as in the tutorial [2], the examples
> of the distribution [3] or my
> > > > > webpage [4]) and we'll be glad to
> receive your comments or bug
> > > > > reports.
> > > >
> > > > And the reason is?
> > >
> > > To me, the fact that you can write portable
> lightweight applets sounds
> > > like a good enough reason. That and the fact that
> I can see this being
> > > used by stuff like Ocsigen to make for (even)
> richer client-server
> > > applications.
> >
> > I presume that one can have some Javascript library to
> abstract out
> > platform differences, but to have a whole new
> language? Well, of course
> > what works works, the question is if the performance
> is any good.
>
> Our final goal is of course to write the whole Web
> application in OCaml (both
> server and client sides). And thus to get the same static
> guarantees for the
> code beeing executed on the browser as we have on server
> side with Ocsigen
> (for example valid xhtml, etc).
>
> To run OCaml on a browser, there are several solutions:
> For example you can use a compiler to js (see for example
> ocamljs), or a
> plugin. O'Browser is an alternative. It seems to be
> efficient enough for most
> uses. For tasks requiring very high efficiency, the only
> solution is a plugin
> _and_ a very efficient xhtml/css rendering engine.
>
> Cheers,
> Vincent Balat
>
> ___
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
> http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
> Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Beginner's list:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
___
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
