Re: [Carbon-dev] User based authorization is depreciated in AuthorizationManager in carbon core
User based authorization means - ability to assign a particular user a set of permission. We have deprecated this support with role based access control. Every user belongs to a role and user inherits permissions from the group he belongs to. Thanks regards, -Prabath On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Xue-Feng Yang just4l...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, What is the user based authorization you two talked about? I would like to know the current situation, docs, and samples on it. Thanks, Xue-Feng -- *From:* Amila Suriarachchi am...@wso2.com *To:* carbon-dev@wso2.org *Sent:* Wed, March 2, 2011 5:41:45 PM *Subject:* Re: [Carbon-dev] User based authorization is depreciated in AuthorizationManager in carbon core SQS Autherization is user based. so we need user based autherization at the carbon Autherization manager level. thanks, Amila. On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Manjula Rathnayake manju...@wso2.comwrote: Hi all, In SQS implementation we have used set of methods related to user based authorization, to provide queue sharing functionality. And In the code review, This was discussed that using depreciated methods in new codes is can not be accepted. So we could not find out any alternate method to get the user based authorization done. Even though the methods (authorizeUser, clearUserAuthorization) are depreciated, they work fine. Can we make available user based authorization methods or any other suggestions on this, please. Thank you. -- Manjula Rathnayaka Software Engineer WSO2, Inc. Mobile:+94 77 743 1987 ___ Carbon-dev mailing list Carbon-dev@wso2.org http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev ___ Carbon-dev mailing list Carbon-dev@wso2.org http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev -- Thanks Regards, Prabath http://blog.facilelogin.com http://RampartFAQ.com ___ Carbon-dev mailing list Carbon-dev@wso2.org http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
Re: [Carbon-dev] User based authorization is depreciated in AuthorizationManager in carbon core
Good. Is there anything like user based role access control in wso2 middleware? The meaning of user based role access control is: In social network, any user can setup the access roles for people visiting his/her pages. For example, for common person: his/her family friends, work friends, classmates, sport teammates, and so on; or for an enterprise user: his/her team members, managers, upstream partners, downstream partners, and so on. This role access control is only for one user's pages, not affects to other's pages. It is different from the one I saw in those samples and docs. Thanks, Xue-Feng From: Prabath Siriwardana prab...@wso2.com To: carbon-dev@wso2.org Cc: Xue-Feng Yang just4l...@yahoo.com Sent: Sat, March 5, 2011 12:58:27 AM Subject: Re: [Carbon-dev] User based authorization is depreciated in AuthorizationManager in carbon core User based authorization means - ability to assign a particular user a set of permission. We have deprecated this support with role based access control. Every user belongs to a role and user inherits permissions from the group he belongs to. Thanks regards, -Prabath On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Xue-Feng Yang just4l...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, What is the user based authorization you two talked about? I would like to know the current situation, docs, and samples on it. Thanks, Xue-Feng From: Amila Suriarachchi am...@wso2.com To: carbon-dev@wso2.org Sent: Wed, March 2, 2011 5:41:45 PM Subject: Re: [Carbon-dev] User based authorization is depreciated in AuthorizationManager in carbon core SQS Autherization is user based. so we need user based autherization at the carbon Autherization manager level. thanks, Amila. On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Manjula Rathnayake manju...@wso2.com wrote: Hi all, In SQS implementation we have used set of methods related to user based authorization, to provide queue sharing functionality. And In the code review, This was discussed that using depreciated methods in new codes is can not be accepted. So we could not find out any alternate method to get the user based authorization done. Even though the methods (authorizeUser, clearUserAuthorization) are depreciated, they work fine. Can we make available user based authorization methods or any other suggestions on this, please. Thank you. -- Manjula Rathnayaka Software Engineer WSO2, Inc. Mobile:+94 77 743 1987 ___ Carbon-dev mailing list Carbon-dev@wso2.org http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev ___ Carbon-dev mailing list Carbon-dev@wso2.org http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev -- Thanks Regards, Prabath http://blog.facilelogin.com http://RampartFAQ.com ___ Carbon-dev mailing list Carbon-dev@wso2.org http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
Re: [Carbon-dev] User based authorization is depreciated in AuthorizationManager in carbon core
SQS Autherization is user based. so we need user based autherization at the carbon Autherization manager level. thanks, Amila. On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Manjula Rathnayake manju...@wso2.comwrote: Hi all, In SQS implementation we have used set of methods related to user based authorization, to provide queue sharing functionality. And In the code review, This was discussed that using depreciated methods in new codes is can not be accepted. So we could not find out any alternate method to get the user based authorization done. Even though the methods (authorizeUser, clearUserAuthorization) are depreciated, they work fine. Can we make available user based authorization methods or any other suggestions on this, please. Thank you. -- Manjula Rathnayaka Software Engineer WSO2, Inc. Mobile:+94 77 743 1987 ___ Carbon-dev mailing list Carbon-dev@wso2.org http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev ___ Carbon-dev mailing list Carbon-dev@wso2.org http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
Re: [Carbon-dev] User based authorization is depreciated in AuthorizationManager in carbon core
For Cassandra, we have the same requirement. Thanks, Indika On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Amila Suriarachchi am...@wso2.com wrote: SQS Autherization is user based. so we need user based autherization at the carbon Autherization manager level. thanks, Amila. On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Manjula Rathnayake manju...@wso2.comwrote: Hi all, In SQS implementation we have used set of methods related to user based authorization, to provide queue sharing functionality. And In the code review, This was discussed that using depreciated methods in new codes is can not be accepted. So we could not find out any alternate method to get the user based authorization done. Even though the methods (authorizeUser, clearUserAuthorization) are depreciated, they work fine. Can we make available user based authorization methods or any other suggestions on this, please. Thank you. -- Manjula Rathnayaka Software Engineer WSO2, Inc. Mobile:+94 77 743 1987 ___ Carbon-dev mailing list Carbon-dev@wso2.org http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev ___ Carbon-dev mailing list Carbon-dev@wso2.org http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev ___ Carbon-dev mailing list Carbon-dev@wso2.org http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
[Carbon-dev] User based authorization is depreciated in AuthorizationManager in carbon core
Hi all, In SQS implementation we have used set of methods related to user based authorization, to provide queue sharing functionality. And In the code review, This was discussed that using depreciated methods in new codes is can not be accepted. So we could not find out any alternate method to get the user based authorization done. Even though the methods (authorizeUser, clearUserAuthorization) are depreciated, they work fine. Can we make available user based authorization methods or any other suggestions on this, please. Thank you. -- Manjula Rathnayaka Software Engineer WSO2, Inc. Mobile:+94 77 743 1987 ___ Carbon-dev mailing list Carbon-dev@wso2.org http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
