[Catalyst] Re: ActiveRecord for Perl

2007-05-22 Thread A. Pagaltzis 
* Adam Bartosik [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-22 13:05]:
 Because of flexibility, Catalyst could be very difficult at
 start (many chooses)

I hear that a lot. I don’t get it, though. The tutorial tells you
to use TT and DBIC. If you install the Catalyst glue for them,
you get helper support for both. It doesn’t seem to me like you
have to make any choices, unless you feel a need to question the
community.

Regards,
-- 
Aristotle Pagaltzis // http://plasmasturm.org/

___
List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/

Re: [Catalyst] Re: ActiveRecord for Perl

2007-05-22 Thread Matt S Trout 
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 10:00:53AM -0700, Quinn Weaver wrote:
 In our case, the choice of form validators is what really took time.
 I started with Catalyst::Plugin::FormValidator, as suggested in the tutorial,
 but found it inadequate.  Then we tried Catalyst::Controller::FormBuilder.
 Now we're using Form::Processor.

Form libraries are -hard-.

I'm hoping the Reaction::UI system's form support will be a good general
solution, at least for complex projects, and it's taken me, what, pushing
two years to get a design I'm -mostly- happy with and the implementation
still isn't complete.

-- 
  Matt S Trout   Need help with your Catalyst or DBIx::Class project?
   Technical DirectorWant a managed development or deployment platform?
 Shadowcat Systems Ltd.  Contact mst (at) shadowcatsystems.co.uk for a quote
http://chainsawblues.vox.com/ http://www.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/ 

___
List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/