[Catalyst] TT macro to avoid excessive $c->uri_for calls
I'm wondering if it has any bad side effects to have a TT macro which is set to
$c->uri_for. If I'm remembering previous posts on this topic correctly, calling
uri_for() repeatedly has quite a big impact on performance which really matters
most for my current application. I have this in a global macros.tt2 file:
[%
base = Catalyst.req.base;
static = Catalyst.config.hosts.static;
images = Catalyst.config.hosts.images;
site.url = {
base= base
static = static
images = images
}
-%]
That way I can easily change the location of my static files and images to
another server or place using the Catalyst config file and generate links like
this:
bla
etc.
Any comments? Thanks!
--Tobias
___
List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
Re: [Catalyst] TT macro to avoid excessive $c->uri_for calls
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 09:43:30AM +0200, Tobias Kremer wrote: > I'm wondering if it has any bad side effects to have a TT macro which is set > to > $c->uri_for. If I'm remembering previous posts on this topic correctly, > calling > uri_for() repeatedly has quite a big impact on performance which really > matters > most for my current application. I have this in a global macros.tt2 file: That's why we optimised the living crap out of uri_for. It's more than 10x faster than it used to be. -- Matt S Trout Need help with your Catalyst or DBIx::Class project? Technical DirectorWant a managed development or deployment platform? Shadowcat Systems Ltd. Contact mst (at) shadowcatsystems.co.uk for a quote http://chainsawblues.vox.com/http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/ ___ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
Re: [Catalyst] TT macro to avoid excessive $c->uri_for calls
On 8/7/07, Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's why we optimised the living crap out of uri_for. > > It's more than 10x faster than it used to be. Great to hear that. Does it also apply to uri_with? -- Zbigniew Lukasiak http://brudnopis.blogspot.com/ ___ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
Re: [Catalyst] TT macro to avoid excessive $c->uri_for calls
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 01:10:09PM +, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote: > On 8/7/07, Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That's why we optimised the living crap out of uri_for. > > > > It's more than 10x faster than it used to be. > > Great to hear that. Does it also apply to uri_with? Nobody ever reported that as a bottleneck, and it's a much simpler code path already. -- Matt S Trout Need help with your Catalyst or DBIx::Class project? Technical DirectorWant a managed development or deployment platform? Shadowcat Systems Ltd. Contact mst (at) shadowcatsystems.co.uk for a quote http://chainsawblues.vox.com/http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/ ___ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
