[Catalyst] http://www.catalystframework.org/calendar/2008/8
sub ACCEPT_CONTEXT {
my ($self, $c ) = @_;
$self = bless({ %$self,
path_to => $c->path_to(''),
}, ref($self));
return $self;
}
Sorry, I'm a bit curious about that code. Why is that done that way
instead of simply:
sub ACCEPT_CONTEXT {
my ($self, $c ) = @_;
$self->path_to( $c->path_to('') );
return $self;
}
Which would also avoid calling DESTROY every request.
--
Bill Moseley
mose...@hank.org
Sent from my iMutt
___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
Re: [Catalyst] http://www.catalystframework.org/calendar/2008/8
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 08:37:25AM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> sub ACCEPT_CONTEXT {
> my ($self, $c ) = @_;
> $self = bless({ %$self,
> path_to => $c->path_to(''),
> }, ref($self));
> return $self;
> }
>
> Sorry, I'm a bit curious about that code. Why is that done that way
> instead of simply:
Well, looking at the Moose example I can see that it's to clone the
object. And DESTROY won't get called, obviously because the ref
count.
Never mind. ;)
--
Bill Moseley
mose...@hank.org
Sent from my iMutt
___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
