Re: [Catalyst] strange generated DBIC accessor name

2010-03-10 Thread Ben van Staveren
DBIx::Class tends to pluralize relationships, so if you have a one to 
many relationship with a table "company_person", it will name it 
"company_people". Generally speaking this is also predictable :)


t...@dix.cz wrote:


Hello catal[yi]sters,

I'm going to be crazzy about one generated accessor name:

__PACKAGE__->has_many(
  "company_people", # I expected to be "company_persons"
  "Jf::Schema::Result::CompanyPerson",
  { "foreign.role" => "self.id" },
);

Other names seems to be predictable:

__PACKAGE__->has_many(
  "company_addresses",
  "Jf::Schema::Result::CompanyAddress",
  { "foreign.role" => "self.id" },
);


I have no "people" pattern in my database. Did I miss something?

The schema has been generated as usual:

script/jf_create.pl model DB DBIC::Schema Jf::Schema create=static \
'dbi:Pg:dbname=jf' tomas

Thanx,
Tomas

___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/

Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/



--
Ben van Staveren
phone: +62 81 70777529
email: benvanstave...@gmail.com


___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/


Re: [Catalyst] strange generated DBIC accessor name

2010-03-10 Thread J. Shirley
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 7:29 AM,   wrote:
>>> I'm going to be crazzy about one generated accessor name:
>>>
>>> __PACKAGE__->has_many(
>>>   "company_people",         # I expected to be "company_persons"
>>>   "Jf::Schema::Result::CompanyPerson",
>>>   { "foreign.role" => "self.id" },
>>> );
>>>
>>> I have no "people" pattern in my database. Did I miss something?
>>
>> People is the correct plural of person.  Apparently Catalyst uses
>> something fairly clever to generate the plurals for relationship names.
>
> Yes, that makes sense.
>
> I changed the name from "person" to persona to avoid that.
> And than I got plural "personae" :-)
>
> This is apparently linguistically perfect, but I rather prefer to have
> consistent (ugly) naming..
>
> Does anybody knows how invoke the *_create script to avoid that?
>
>
> thanx,
> Tomas
>
>
>> Regards,
>> Denny
>>
>>
>
>

This discussion really belongs on the DBIx::Class mailing list, not on
the Catalyst mailing list.
http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class


As Frazer posted above, yes, you can override this:
http://search.cpan.org/~rkitover/DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader-0.05003/lib/DBIx/Class/Schema/Loader/Base.pm#inflect_plural

-J

___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/


Re: [Catalyst] strange generated DBIC accessor name

2010-03-10 Thread th

I'm going to be crazzy about one generated accessor name:

__PACKAGE__->has_many(
   "company_people", # I expected to be "company_persons"
   "Jf::Schema::Result::CompanyPerson",
   { "foreign.role" => "self.id" },
);

I have no "people" pattern in my database. Did I miss something?


People is the correct plural of person.  Apparently Catalyst uses
something fairly clever to generate the plurals for relationship names.


Yes, that makes sense.

I changed the name from "person" to persona to avoid that.
And than I got plural "personae" :-)

This is apparently linguistically perfect, but I rather prefer to have
consistent (ugly) naming..

Does anybody knows how invoke the *_create script to avoid that?


thanx,
Tomas



Regards,
Denny




___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/


Re: [Catalyst] strange generated DBIC accessor name

2010-03-10 Thread Denny
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 14:15 +0100, t...@dix.cz wrote:
> Hello catal[yi]sters,
> 
> I'm going to be crazzy about one generated accessor name:
> 
> __PACKAGE__->has_many(
>"company_people", # I expected to be "company_persons"
>"Jf::Schema::Result::CompanyPerson",
>{ "foreign.role" => "self.id" },
> );
> 
> I have no "people" pattern in my database. Did I miss something?

People is the correct plural of person.  Apparently Catalyst uses
something fairly clever to generate the plurals for relationship names.

Regards,
Denny



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/


Re: [Catalyst] strange generated DBIC accessor name

2010-03-10 Thread Frazer Irving
The plural forms of autogenerated relationships are handle by
Lingua::EN::Inflect (I think), and that module will give the plural of
'person' as 'people'

Overriding the defaults is documented here:

http://search.cpan.org/~rkitover/DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader-0.05003/lib/DBIx/Class/Schema/Loader/Base.pm#inflect_plural

f

On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 1:15 PM,  wrote:

>
> Hello catal[yi]sters,
>
> I'm going to be crazzy about one generated accessor name:
>
> __PACKAGE__->has_many(
>  "company_people", # I expected to be "company_persons"
>  "Jf::Schema::Result::CompanyPerson",
>  { "foreign.role" => "self.id" },
> );
>
> Other names seems to be predictable:
>
> __PACKAGE__->has_many(
>  "company_addresses",
>  "Jf::Schema::Result::CompanyAddress",
>  { "foreign.role" => "self.id" },
> );
>
>
> I have no "people" pattern in my database. Did I miss something?
>
> The schema has been generated as usual:
>
> script/jf_create.pl model DB DBIC::Schema Jf::Schema create=static \
> 'dbi:Pg:dbname=jf' tomas
>
> Thanx,
> Tomas
>
> ___
> List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
> Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
> Searchable archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
> Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
>
___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/


[Catalyst] strange generated DBIC accessor name

2010-03-10 Thread th


Hello catal[yi]sters,

I'm going to be crazzy about one generated accessor name:

__PACKAGE__->has_many(
  "company_people", # I expected to be "company_persons"
  "Jf::Schema::Result::CompanyPerson",
  { "foreign.role" => "self.id" },
);

Other names seems to be predictable:

__PACKAGE__->has_many(
  "company_addresses",
  "Jf::Schema::Result::CompanyAddress",
  { "foreign.role" => "self.id" },
);


I have no "people" pattern in my database. Did I miss something?

The schema has been generated as usual:

script/jf_create.pl model DB DBIC::Schema Jf::Schema create=static \
'dbi:Pg:dbname=jf' tomas

Thanx,
Tomas

___
List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/