On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
> Just to make it clear: The build works without ccache, right?
It has always worked without ccache, yes.
I have solved the issue now. It was on my end. Generally when I
install FreeBSD I select the 'minimal' option and nothing more. Today,
in testing this, I looked more closely at what I could/should be
installing. One of the possible items is the '32bit runtime
compatibility libraries'. After ensuring this was installed I tried my
builds again. I have now successfully completed three builds and
recorded their results. I don't understand why the inclusion/exclusion
of this would cause the difference when building with ccache, but it
does work now. Below are the speed improvements (first pass, second
pass), using ccache 3.0pre1 on FreeBSD 8.0. 4cpu, 4G RAM:
--
>>> World build completed on Wed May 12 12:04:26 MDT 2010
--
real44m2.754s
user80m5.733s
sys 55m59.135s
--
>>> Kernel build for MOUZONE completed on Wed May 12 12:19:54 MDT 2010
--
real13m31.544s
user18m38.484s
sys 11m38.547s
--
>>> World build completed on Wed May 12 12:41:39 MDT 2010
--
real7m0.725s
user10m1.925s
sys 9m56.014s
--
>>> Kernel build for MOUZONE completed on Wed May 12 12:44:00 MDT 2010
--
real1m34.594s
user1m1.464s
sys 0m57.740s
(after two passes)
[r...@mouzone /usr/src]# ccache -s
cache directory /usr/.ccache
cache hit (direct) 1890
cache hit (preprocessed) 652
cache miss 27492
called for link 918
multiple source files 2
compile failed 300
preprocessor error 111
bad compiler arguments37
not a C/C++ file2284
autoconf compile/link 1547
unsupported compiler option4
no input file182
files in cache 27492
cache size 407.3 Mbytes
max cache size 1.0 Gbytes
Thank you for your help.
--
Christer Edwards
___
ccache mailing list
ccache@lists.samba.org
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/ccache
