Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 37, Issue 96 Call from PSTN to BR-2 (H.323) failed
-priority 10 CME-GW zone prefix UCM 3... gw-priority 0 cmtrunk_2 cmtrunk_1 no shutdown -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090315/1f9e2d24/attachment-0001.htm -- Message: 4 Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 05:47:34 +0100 From: basant yadav basant.ya...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3xxx call from HQ to BR2 through GK To: Scott ODonnell scott.odonn...@gmail.com Cc: OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Message-ID: 4a2451a70903142147w54cf8636yba89ae61d40f2...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Hi Scott I do not much about RAS messages but coming to the basics here, I see the following in the Gatekeeper Debugs:- : rassrv_get_addrinfo: (1#3001) Matched zone prefix 3 and remainder 001 which means GK did found the path for the call correctly using zone prefix of 3. Now first thing, we should check here is whether the incoming call is hitting the correct dial-peer on CME GW (In your case its '2). I am assuming it does since you have incoming called-number set as . in there. But what is the translation-profile incoming pstn-in converting the 1#3001 to? Remember GK nevers strips anything so on CME-GW, you should have received 1#3001 and it should get converted to DN 3001 using the translation profile. HTH - Basant On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 5:34 AM, Scott ODonnell scott.odonn...@gmail.comwrote: I'm having a problem getting a call from HQ to BR2 through the GK. I'm assuming the DCF indicated in the debug RAS means some part of the setup between UCM and BR2 is not working but can't pinpoint it. - debug gatekeeper main 10 indicates the request is coming from UCM : gk_rassrv_arq: arqp=0x83E0AD08, crv=0xB, answerCall=0 : gk_dns_query: No Name servers : rassrv_get_addrinfo: (1#3001) Matched tech-prefix 1# : rassrv_get_addrinfo: (1#3001) Matched zone prefix 3 and remainder 001 : rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the source side, src_zonep=0x83E0EFB0 rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is UCM, and z_invianamelen=0 : rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the destination side, dst_zonep=0x83E0EFB0 : rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is UCM, and z_outvianamelen=0 gk_rassrv_arq: arqp=0x83B6CA74, crv=0x10, answerCall=1 AND debug RAS on BR 2 indicates the request is making it to the GW Mar 15 04:13:46.770: %FAN-3-FAN_FAILED: Fan 3 had a rotation error reported. Mar 15 04:13:47.522: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket Mar 15 04:13:47.522: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket: fd=0 of type LISTENING has data Mar 15 04:13:47.526: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket Mar 15 04:13:47.526: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket: fd=3 of type ACCEPTED has data Mar 15 04:13:47.526: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket: h323chan accepted/connected fd=3 h323chan_dgram_send:Sent UDP msg. Bytes sent: 134 to 104.255.1.1:1719 fd=2 Mar 15 04:13:47.526: RASLib::GW_RASSendARQ: ARQ (seq# 5788) sent to 104.255.1.1 Mar 15 04:13:47.534: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket Mar 15 04:13:47.534: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket: fd=2 of type CONNECTED has data Mar 15 04:13:47.534: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket: h323chan accepted/connected fd=2 Mar 15 04:13:47.534: h323chan_dgram_recvdata:rcvd from [104.255.1.1:1719] on fd=2 Mar 15 04:13:47.534: ACF (seq# 5788) rcvdh323chan_dgram_send:Sent UDP msg. Bytes sent: 103 to 104.255.1.1:1719 fd=2 Mar 15 04:13:47.538: RASLib::GW_RASSendDRQ: DRQ (seq# 5789) sent to 104.255.1.1 Mar 15 04:13:47.542: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket Mar 15 04:13:47.542: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket: fd=2 of type CONNECTED has data Mar 15 04:13:47.542: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket: h323chan accepted/connected fd=2 Mar 15 04:13:47.542: h323chan_dgram_recvdata:rcvd from [104.255.1.1:1719] on fd=2 Mar 15 04:13:47.542: DCF (seq# 5789) rcvd Mar 15 04:13:47.550: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket Mar 15 04:13:47.550: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket: fd=3 of type ACCEPTED has data Mar 15 04:13:47.550: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket: h323chan accepted/connected fd=3 h323chan_dgram_send:Sent UDP msg. Bytes sent: 81 to 104.255.1.1:1719 fd=2 Mar 15 04:13:48.522: RASLib::GW_RASSendRRQ: RRQ (seq# 5790) sent to 104.255.1.1 Mar 15 04:13:48.526: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket Mar 15 04:13:48.526: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket: fd=2 of type CONNECTED has data Mar 15 04:13:48.526: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket: h323chan accepted/connected fd=2 Mar 15 04:13:48.526: h323chan_dgram_recvdata:rcvd from [104.255.1.1:1719] on fd=2 Mar 15 04:13:48.526: RCF (seq# 5790) rcvd BR2 Int loop 0 h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip id UCM ipaddr 104.255.1.1 1719 h323-gateway voip h323-id CME-GW h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 1# h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 104.255.3.1 dial-peer voice 2 voip translation-profile incoming pstn-in incoming called-number . dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric HQ-GK gatekeeper zone local UCM ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Auto QOS for LAN QOS
Hi All Has anyone ever used/tried in practice or real lab to use Auto QOS for LAN/Campus QOS. I think its pretty useful if you don't want to mark anything on the switches and requirment is to only trust the COS coming from phones. It saves lot of time. I am about to start practicing it but would like some second opinions before I end up in a mess and has to change my mindset. - Basant
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Auto QOS for LAN QOS
Auto QOS are allowed in real lab first ?, Basant can you explain how to enable auto qos in switch, I have never try this. --- On Sun, 15/3/09, basant yadav basant.ya...@gmail.com wrote: From: basant yadav basant.ya...@gmail.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Auto QOS for LAN QOS To: OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Sunday, 15 March, 2009, 5:40 PM Hi All Has anyone ever used/tried in practice or real lab to use Auto QOS for LAN/Campus QOS. I think its pretty useful if you don't want to mark anything on the switches and requirment is to only trust the COS coming from phones. It saves lot of time. I am about to start practicing it but would like some second opinions before I end up in a mess and has to change my mindset. - Basant Get your preferred Email name! Now you can @ymail.com and @rocketmail.com. http://mail.promotions.yahoo.com/newdomains/aa/
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Trouble loading CUPS
Trouble loading CUPSThe answer to your question is YESit's the first server in the CUPS cluster. It will have a license file that will need to be loaded (on the first server), and it will transfer the rights to other servers that are part of the cluster under its license file. If you're telling it it's not the first server, it's attempting to get the license file from the one you specify. Since CCM doesn't have this license, it will fail. - Original Message - From: Girard, Jeffrey COL MIL USA To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 12:07 AM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Trouble loading CUPS I just tried to load CUC on a new/separate VM on the same host machine and ran into the exact same problem Here is a thought/questionwhen the install asks me about whether this install is the first node in the cluster - I am answering the question NO as I already have a Pub installed. Is each type of server (CUCM, CUPS, CUC, UXCC) considered as separate clusters? Should I be answering YES to first node in the cluster question? -- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Sat Mar 14 20:17:39 2009 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Trouble loading CUPS I have installed 2 copies of CUCM Version 7 - both in VMWare on the same host. On another host, also inside VMWare, I am trying to load CUPS Version 7 I created an ISO from the istall disk and created the guest VM. Specs used - 1.3 GB RAM, 75 GB HD. Initial install of Red Hat Linux goes well On another machine, I opened up a browser to the CUCM Pub at 10.10.210.10 On the Pub, I added the CUPS server using the IP as the name. This is the same process that I used while loading up the Sub. In the second phase of the CUPS install, I receive the following error message. Have repeated these steps twice with the same results, so its a consistent error Configuration validation with CMPublisher (10.10.210.10) failed Configured deployment cups does not match the deployment at 10.10.210.10 It then asks me if CMPublisher is the correct first node If I select the option to correct the error, I am taken back to the screen where I define the first node information (machine name, IP address, password). I have gone through this loop twice with no changes From the host I amable to ping both the CUCMs with no problems Any ideas?
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] dial-peer matching question
Hi, digit by digit matching causes this problem. once you press the last 1 of 9324121, the string you dialed has already matched the dial-peer 90 and been sent out immediately. Cheers, Allan
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Error Message
I am getting CUE Error Message when trying to leave a message - It prompts Please leave a messaeg which is more that 2 sconds long I am leaving the message of more than 10 seconds but no luck at all, has anyone faced same problem please
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Error Message
Yes please...dtmf are being detected... --- On Mon, 3/16/09, Wesley Lim lim.wes...@gmail.com wrote: From: Wesley Lim lim.wes...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Error Message To: anil...@yahoo.com, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Monday, March 16, 2009, 6:49 AM Sounds to me like the RTP stream is not getting through. Is your dtmf tones detected when call hits CUE? On 3/16/09, anil batra anil...@yahoo.com wrote: I am getting CUE Error Message when trying to leave a message - It prompts Please leave a messaeg which is more that 2 sconds long I am leaving the message of more than 10 seconds but no luck at all, has anyone faced same problem please -- Sent from my mobile device
