Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Transformations... vol 2 lab 3...

[Jonathan Charles]

OK, it works... I am starting to figure this out... the xform is being
invoked by the receiving phone... not the sending... so I am not
modifying MY ANI as I send it, he is modifying my ANI as HE receives
it.

BTW, this does NOT work with CIPC... well, it does, just no + sign in 7.0(1).


Jonathan

On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
> This is strange...
>
> No Calling Party Transformations, but the CSS Is in the device pool,
> and the + sign goes away... remove the CSS and the + sign shows up...
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Otto Sanchez wrote:
>> You dont want to remove your translation pattern, if you do so, how will you
>> globalize your calling number when calling from an internal extension?
>>
>> Globalize first, localize later
>>
>> For example
>> 5002   pt-internal  css-internal
>> 1002   pt-internal  css-internal
>>
>> css-internal
>>   pt-tp
>>
>> css-gw
>>   pt-internal
>>
>> translation pattern
>> [15]XXX  pt=pt-tp, calling#xform=prefix +1 plus external phone
>> number mask, css=css-gw (here you are globalizing your calling#)
>>
>> then create calling xform pattern (here you're localizing)
>> \+1212394.5XXX, pt-hq-localize, xform=predot
>> \+1617863.1XXX, pt-hq-localize, xform=predot
>>
>> \+1212394.5XXX, pt-br1-localize, xform=predot
>> \+1617863.1XXX, pt-br1-localize, xform=predot
>>
>> css-hq-localize
>>    pt-hq-localize
>>
>> css-br1-localize
>>    pt-br1-localize
>>
>> Assign those cg xform patterns css to each device pool or phones
>> individually
>>
>> If you want to call back from directories, just create the following
>> translation patterns
>> \+1212394.5XXX  pt=pt-tp, calling#xform=prefix +1 plus external
>> phone number mask, calledxform=predot,css=css-gw
>> \+1617863.1XXX  pt=pt-tp, calling#xform=prefix +1 plus external
>> phone number mask, calledxform=predot,css=css-gw
>>
>> Result:
>> 1.- Internal callers see 4 digits in display when receiving calls from
>> internal callers and + numbers when reviewing the directories
>> 2.- Internal callers can call back using + dialling in addition to dial 4
>> digit numbers for internal calls
>>
>> HTH,
>>
>> Otto
>> 
>> From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonv...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tue 25/08/2009 22:19
>> To: Otto Sanchez
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Transformations... vol 2 lab 3...
>>
>> If I remove the transformation pattern, I get the 11 digits with the +...
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Otto Sanchez wrote:
>>> This could mean that you are reaching your phones directly and not passing
>>> through the translation pattern to globalize the call first, therefore not
>>> hitting your cg xform pattern in order to localize back your phone display
>>> to 4 digits,
>>>
>>> Check your phones css and make sure they don't reach your phones pt
>>> directly,
>>>
>>> BR
>>>
>>> Otto
>>> 
>>> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com on behalf of Jonathan Charles
>>> Sent: Tue 25/08/2009 21:41
>>> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Transformations... vol 2 lab 3...
>>>
>>> So, I couldn't get the incoming call to display 4-digit and the
>>> missed/recieved history to show the E.164, copied the config from the
>>> PG and no difference... when I apply the transformation \1212394
>>> to  to the device pool, I get 4 digits in the display and 4 digits
>>> in the missed/received history... (if I remove it, I see the + sign
>>> again...)
>>>
>>> Any ideas?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] hyper-v image for CCM 7.X

[anupam TYAGI]

Like the vmware has the support of creating virtual machines for ccm and
cups . i want to know wether , the Windows 2008 Hyper-V has the ability to
create the virutal machines for ccm and cups . As per my understanding the
ccm7.x ,6.x only supports vmware BIOS not the Microsoft Hyper-V .

has anybody done it , pls ahre your experience ...

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Ravindra Lakpriya wrote:

> Hi George
> its a Bare metal version of vmware. U have to install directly top of the
> hardware. Not top of the operating system.
>
> And it highly supported on top of server hardware. 90% of desktop mother
> boards are not supported on this.
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:21 PM, c george  wrote:
>
>> how do you install esx server 3.5 ontop of windows server. I get a iso
>> when I download it from vmware
>>
>> Respectfully Charles George
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:46:39 -0700
>> From: tanner.ez...@gmail.com
>> To: anuf...@gmail.com
>> CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] hyper-v image for CCM 7.X
>>
>>
>> Any specific reason you would want to? VMware is 100% fully supported.
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 8:40 AM, anupam TYAGI  wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Has any body tried making virtual Machines for ccm  and cups using
>> MicroSoft Hyper-V...
>>
>> Thanks
>> Anupam
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>>
>>  --
>> Hotmail® is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast. Try it
>> now.
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Ravindra Lakpriya
> +94 773 532 094
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Transformations... vol 2 lab 3...

[Jonathan Charles]

So, I couldn't get the incoming call to display 4-digit and the
missed/recieved history to show the E.164, copied the config from the
PG and no difference... when I apply the transformation \1212394
to  to the device pool, I get 4 digits in the display and 4 digits
in the missed/received history... (if I remove it, I see the + sign
again...)

Any ideas?



Jonathan
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 1 lab 5.17 - does called xform pattern only work with std local RGs?

[Michael Ciarfello]

Hi Aamir,
Thanks for the reply.  My initial problem got solved.  Just one of those weird 
config issues.  Unconfigured some stuff and reconfigured some stuff and it 
started working.  It spanned over two nights where I shut down my equipmnet 
overnight, so the second night was a fresh reboot.

You are correct on the over writes.  It's also different behavior when SIP 
trunk is involved.  My HQ site was still SIP at that point in the lab 5a.

Well, they wanted to keep 7.0(1) in the lab for a reason.  sigh.
Thanks

From: Aamir Panjwani [aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au]
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 1:48 AM
To: Michael Ciarfello; OSL Group
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 1 lab 5.17 - does called xform pattern 
only work with std local RGs?

Ok I have just tested, called party transformation pattern works fine for 
normal route group, however, there is a catch when the calls takes the failover 
path.

Let says you have called party transformation pattern 9.[2-9]XX for BR1 
local calls. Now in a scenario when your HQ gateway is down, the locals calls 
for HQ site will go out BR1 gateway where on the route group you have predot 
and prefix 1212. But when the call hit BR1 gateway it overrides the route group 
manipulation and applies called party transformation pattern which was 
originally created for BR1 local calls, hence the call fails.

So I think I would use called party transformation pattern only while using 
standard local route group because for normal route group you can do called 
manipulation at the route group level within the route list then why bother 
going called party transformation pattern path….




From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Michael Ciarfello
Sent: Monday, 24 August 2009 2:44 PM
To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 1 lab 5.17 - does called xform pattern only 
work with std local RGs?

Do called party transformation patterns only work when using standard local 
route groups?

Q5.17 with StdLocalRG (as configured in chapter 5). Everything works fine.  BR1 
phone2 roams to HQ and can dial 8+ HQ local 7-digit number and PSTN phone rings.

Just to fool around, change the Q5.7 to use a provisioned (borrowing SRND 
terminology) RL / RG instead of StdLocalRG,
  9.[2-9]XX (HQ_Local_PT)  -> HQ_SIP_RL -> HQ_SIP_RG -> HQ_SIP_Trunk 
(gateway)
  8.[2-9]XX (BR1_Local_PT) -> BR1_MGCP_RL -> BR1_MGCP_RG -> BR1 mgcp gateway
the called party transformation doesn't seem to kick in.

SRND, F&S Guide and System guide VAGUELY discuss the topic, but don't 
specifically say Local Route Groups are a requirement for Called Party 
Transformation Patterns.

Thanks

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voice Codec Bandwidth Tool

[Dave Genton]

Nope
Thanks,
Dave Genton
Architect - CCIE #6746
Insight Networking



From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 

To: ccievoice 
Sent: Tue Aug 25 16:00:14 2009
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voice Codec Bandwidth Tool
Is it possible that we will have access to this in the lab?
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voice Codec Bandwidth Tool

[Steve Sarrick]

Is it possible that we will have access to this in the lab?

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] hyper-v image for CCM 7.X

[Ravindra Lakpriya]

Hi George
its a Bare metal version of vmware. U have to install directly top of the
hardware. Not top of the operating system.

And it highly supported on top of server hardware. 90% of desktop mother
boards are not supported on this.

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:21 PM, c george  wrote:

>  how do you install esx server 3.5 ontop of windows server. I get a iso
> when I download it from vmware
>
> Respectfully Charles George
>
>
>
> --
> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:46:39 -0700
> From: tanner.ez...@gmail.com
> To: anuf...@gmail.com
> CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] hyper-v image for CCM 7.X
>
>
> Any specific reason you would want to? VMware is 100% fully supported.
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 8:40 AM, anupam TYAGI  wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Has any body tried making virtual Machines for ccm  and cups using
> MicroSoft Hyper-V...
>
> Thanks
> Anupam
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
> --
> Hotmail® is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast. Try it
> now.
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>


-- 
Ravindra Lakpriya
+94 773 532 094
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] hyper-v image for CCM 7.X

[Tanner Ezell]

ESX server is meant to be standalone. Though some have gotten it to install
under Workstation, it's not recommended. You want the standard VMware Server
(no ESX).

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:51 AM, c george  wrote:

>  how do you install esx server 3.5 ontop of windows server. I get a iso
> when I download it from vmware
>
> Respectfully Charles George
>
>
>
> --
> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:46:39 -0700
> From: tanner.ez...@gmail.com
> To: anuf...@gmail.com
> CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] hyper-v image for CCM 7.X
>
>
> Any specific reason you would want to? VMware is 100% fully supported.
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 8:40 AM, anupam TYAGI  wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Has any body tried making virtual Machines for ccm  and cups using
> MicroSoft Hyper-V...
>
> Thanks
> Anupam
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
> --
> Hotmail® is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast. Try it
> now.
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] hyper-v image for CCM 7.X

[Ravindra Lakpriya]

Ya once i tried it wit Xen it was not successful.
Best Regards

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Tanner Ezell wrote:

> Any specific reason you would want to? VMware is 100% fully supported.
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 8:40 AM, anupam TYAGI  wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Has any body tried making virtual Machines for ccm  and cups using
>> MicroSoft Hyper-V...
>>
>> Thanks
>> Anupam
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>


-- 
Ravindra Lakpriya
+94 773 532 094
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] hyper-v image for CCM 7.X

[c george]

how do you install esx server 3.5 ontop of windows server. I get a iso when I 
download it from vmware

Respectfully Charles George


 


Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:46:39 -0700
From: tanner.ez...@gmail.com
To: anuf...@gmail.com
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] hyper-v image for CCM 7.X

Any specific reason you would want to? VMware is 100% fully supported.


On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 8:40 AM, anupam TYAGI  wrote:


Hi 
 
Has any body tried making virtual Machines for ccm  and cups using MicroSoft 
Hyper-V...
 
Thanks
Anupam
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com



_
Hotmail® is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast. 
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=PID23391::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HYGN_faster:082009___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] hyper-v image for CCM 7.X

[Tanner Ezell]

Any specific reason you would want to? VMware is 100% fully supported.

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 8:40 AM, anupam TYAGI  wrote:

> Hi
>
> Has any body tried making virtual Machines for ccm  and cups using
> MicroSoft Hyper-V...
>
> Thanks
> Anupam
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] hyper-v image for CCM 7.X

[anupam TYAGI]

Hi

Has any body tried making virtual Machines for ccm  and cups using MicroSoft
Hyper-V...

Thanks
Anupam
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 vRack

[Steve Sarrick]

Is anyone having success with Vol 2 vRacks?  Every time I seem to do a
lab there seems to be some type of issue.  Lately its been with the
Pub/Sub seem like they are not 100% synced, like some things work and
others do not.  For example, the last couple times out, I have not had
any phones register to the Sub even though services are running and on
another occasion.  I take my test in a week and while I am able to do
configurations, testing and troubleshooting is almost impossible to do
because things don't work correctly.  Usually have to check my answers
via the proctor guide versus testing for myself.  Any recommendations
would be welcome.

 

Steve

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPCCX Scripting

[Jonathan Charles]

Nevermind...

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/custcosw/ps1846/products_programming_reference_guides_list.html


J

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
> Do you have links to them?
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Mike Thompson wrote:
>> Buried in the crypts of CCO, there is a nice set of docs for scripting.
>>
>> Cisco unified contact center express getting started with scripts is
>> the first one. Each is bout 10mb so no emailing
>>
>>
>> Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
>>
>> On Aug 24, 2009, at 7:34 PM, ABIOLA ADEFILA 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> does anyone have an idea of a guide that will help understand how to
>>> write a script apart from the documents from CCO
>>>
>>> thanks in advance
>>>
>>> Rgd
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPCCX Scripting

[Jonathan Charles]

Do you have links to them?

On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Mike Thompson wrote:
> Buried in the crypts of CCO, there is a nice set of docs for scripting.
>
> Cisco unified contact center express getting started with scripts is
> the first one. Each is bout 10mb so no emailing
>
>
> Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
>
> On Aug 24, 2009, at 7:34 PM, ABIOLA ADEFILA 
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> does anyone have an idea of a guide that will help understand how to
>> write a script apart from the documents from CCO
>>
>> thanks in advance
>>
>> Rgd
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com