[OSL | CCIE_Voice] mls qos trust dscp on Nexus 7k
Is there a way to tell a port (eth1/1) on a Nexus 7010 to trust dscp? Normally for Unity/CallManager/IOS Voice Gateways I put a "mls qos trust dscp" on the those interface. What is Nexus equivalent? - Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] PSTN phone
No matter what I do my PSTN phone is coming up with numbers for OWLE Lab 3. Can someone tell me the trick to make it come up with the lab that I loaded, OWLE Lab 2? Thanks in advance. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Issue
Hello Experts, I have problem in integrating GK with CUCM and BR2, showing below all configuration I made for the integration. The problem in prefix #1 the only prefix register on GW (3 is not, which should come from BR2). And also CUCM pub is the old server register to GK (sub is not). Please check configuration and tell me, maybe I forget something. HQ-RTR: == ! voice service voip sip bind control source-interface FastEthernet0/0.11 bind media source-interface FastEthernet0/0.11 ! gatekeeper zone local PL proctorlabs.com zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1 zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 0 BR2-RTR zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 0 BR2-RTR no shutdown ! BR2-RTR: === ! interface Loopback0 ip address 177.1.254.3 255.255.255.255 h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip id PL ipaddr 177.1.11.1 1719 h323-gateway voip h323-id BR2-RTR h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 3 ! voice service voip allow-connections h323 to sip allow-connections sip to h323 h323 h225 listen-port 1820 no call service stop ! CUCM: = . Add GK . Add Trunk . Change service parameter with gk-trunk value. . Change signaling port in gateway page to be 1820 Any way I think CUCM configuration should not affect Sub only to not be register. Thanks in advance, Tamer ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 56, "H323 GW on the CUCM Doesn't Prefix "+/+1/+1212" for any ISDN Type Numbering Plan
Hi All, It is working, found the problem, it was my mistake that I bound the H323 to a wrong interface on the HQ Router. Oops got to be very careful, this mistake costed me 3 Hrs during my practice... Sriharshaa Prabhakar| From: Sriharshaa Prabhakar Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 10:58 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 56, "H323 GW on the CUCM Doesn't Prefix "+/+1/+1212" for any ISDN Type Numbering Plan Hi All, I was doing Lab 5 and was following Vik and tried doing the same configuration on the CUCM where I have H323 GW to HQ PSTN and MGCP to BR1/SITEB PSTN. I noticed a strange behavior when I had to prefix for +1212 for Globalizaing the Calling Party of HQ PSTN to +12123942123 for type Subscriber it never worked at all. From the CCM Trace I can see that the Configuration was successfully processed and updated however the +1212 doesn't get prefixed to the calls coming in thru the H323 GW. I further tested for the MGCP Gateways and it works flawless. I tried doing the same on the Service Parameter and it works and now the problem is I have HQ & BR1 sending 7 Digits Caller ID and I have to prefix +1212 on the HQ Side & +1617 on the BR1 Side which I cannot if I have to update this parameter globally I can only do this if the PSTN is sending me 10 Digits where in I just have to prefix +1 to Globalize the Calling Party Number. I apply the +1212 on the H323 GW once again and from the Trace it is evident that the CM processes the configuration CLID::StandAloneCluster> 10/14/2010 11:19:32.166 CCM|Cnf Received: processconfig U 21d7ecf7-2d54-4cc6-aff3-19ea44028de6, size(949) paramvalue(/+1212) | 10/14/2010 11:19:32.172 CCM|ProcessCnf N: processconfig U 21d7ecf7-2d54-4cc6-aff3-19ea44028de6, size(949) paramvalue(/+1212) | But the Phone only displays 3942123 Now I will configure the +1212 Prefix Globally in the Service Parameters & leave the +1617 on the MGCP as it is and verify the trace once again. 10/14/2010 11:32:10.379 CCM|SPROC::prependCallingPtyNum - Calling number 3942123 is prepended with subscriber prefix +1212, updated calling party number=+12123942123| 10/14/2010 11:32:10.379 CCM| LocalizeCgpnAndSendOutpulsedNumber: StationCdpc on device SEP0022555EF776 , CSS = ,useDevicePoolCgpnCss =1 AlternateCgpn(global)=+12123942123 cgpn=+12123942123| 10/14/2010 11:32:10.379 CCM|StationCdpc:CcSetupReq - unicodeConnectedUnicodeDisplayName='' asciiConnectedDisplayName='HQ-PSTN'| 10/14/2010 11:32:10.379 CCM|StationCdpc:CcSetupReq - unicodeCallingPartyName='' asciiCallingPartyName='HQ-PSTN' callingParty='+12123942123' unicodeCalledPartyName='HQPH1' asciiCalledPartyName='HQPH1' calledParty='5001' cgIP=IpAddr.type:0 ipv4Addr:0x(0.0.0.0) | GW, the calls that came thru HQ GW displayed as +12123942123 for the Calling Party Number whereas the Calls that came through Site B PSTN (MGCP) the calls were prefixed with +1212+16178631001. This is a disaster. Alternatively I tried configure a Voice Translation Rules in the lines as shown below on the HQ Router voice translation-rule 1 rule 1 /^\(.\)/ /+1212\1/ type subscriber subscriber plan any isdn rule 2 /^\(.\)/ /+1\1/ type national national plan any isdn ! voice translation-profile pstn-calling translate calling 1 ! dial-peer voice 12 voip translation-profile outgoing pstn-calling destination-pattern 2123945... Result: - In this case the Router was sending +12123942123 & +16178632683 but the Phone displayed only 12123942123 & 16178632683. HQ-SITE# 89: *Oct 14 19:54:23.371 UTC: //-1//RXRULE/regxrule_get_profile_from_trunkgroup_internal: Voice port 0x48A13C28 does not belong to any trunk group 90: *Oct 14 19:54:23.371 UTC: //-1//RXRULE/regxrule_get_profile_from_trunkgroup_internal: Voice port 0x48A13C28 does not belong to any trunk group 91: *Oct 14 19:54:23.371 UTC: //-1/AD1DA36F8005/RXRULE/regxrule_stack_pop_RegXruleNumInfo: stack=0x49631030; count=1 92: *Oct 14 19:54:23.375 UTC: //-1/AD1DA36F8005/RXRULE/regxrule_stack_pop_callinfo_internal: numinfo=0x49509024 93: *Oct 14 19:54:23.375 UTC: //-1/AD1DA36F8005/RXRULE/regxrule_stack_push_RegXruleNumInfo_internal: stack=0x49631030; count=1 94: *Oct 14 19:54:23.379 UTC: //-1/AD1DA36F8005/RXRULE/regxrule_stack_push_RegXruleNumInfo_internal: stack=0x49631030; count=2 95: *Oct 14 19:54:23.379 UTC: //-1/AD1DA36F8005/RXRULE/regxrule_profile_translate_internal: number=3942123 type=subscriber plan=isdn numbertype=calling 96: *Oct 14 19:54:23.379 UTC: //-1/AD1DA36F8005/RXRULE/regxrule_profile_match_internal: Matched with rule 1 in ruleset 1 97: *Oct 14 19:54:23.379 UTC: //-1/AD1DA36F8005/RXRULE/regxrule_profile_match_internal: Matched with rule 1 in ruleset 1 98: *Oct 14 19:54:23.379 UTC: //-1/AD1DA36F8005/RXRULE/sed_subst: Successful substitution; pattern=3942123 matchPattern=^(.) replacePattern=+1212\1 replaced pattern=+12123942123
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 56, Issue 130
Hi, You can keep it default like Username:- Administrator & Password:- cisco which is pretty simple... Sriharshaa Prabhakar -Original Message- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 10:59 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 56, Issue 130 Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com You can reach the person managing the list at ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: CUE 7.0.3 ivr license installation failed (=?gbk?B?YnJ1bm8=?=) 2. Passwords on the Lab (Maciej Karpinski) 3. Re: Passwords on the Lab (Steve Denney (stdenney)) 4. Re: Passwords on the Lab (Maciej Karpinski) 5. Call Handler Operation (Amr Sherif) 6. CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 56, "H323 GW on the CUCM Doesn't Prefix "+/+1/+1212" for any ISDN Type Numbering Plan (Sriharshaa Prabhakar) -- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 00:21:01 +0800 From: "=?gbk?B?YnJ1bm8=?=" To: "=?gbk?B?Y2NpZV92b2ljZQ==?=" Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE 7.0.3 ivr license installation failed Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gbk" hello mate , how did u finally fix the problem? brunoHi , I got a strange problem when trying to install ivr license file , anybody face this before ? Downloading ftp cue-vm-license_4port_ivr_7.0.3.pkg Bytes downloaded : 3319 Validating package signature ... done compatibility mode Validating installed manifests .complete. The system will be brought to offline state for a brief period and will be brought back to online state automatically No work order produced. The system is back in online state 55296+0 records in 108+0 records out ERROR - Hot Installation failed. Cyrus -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -- Message: 2 Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 20:30:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Maciej Karpinski To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passwords on the Lab Message-ID: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Hi I passed my CCIE Voice written a couple of weeks ago and will start to build a lab. Does any one know usernames/passwords used on the lab? Would want to use the same in my own lab. /Maciej -- Message: 3 Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:34:47 -0500 From: "Steve Denney (stdenney)" To: "Maciej Karpinski" , Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passwords on the Lab Message-ID: <6fae5cd044f54e449e4db9a8567dde020295f...@xmb-rcd-111.cisco.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Congratulations on passing your written. Even if someone did know the usernames/passwords, to post them would be in violation of NDA. Just use something short and simple for your own lab, such as "admin | cisc0123". cheers, sd -Original Message- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Maciej Karpinski Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 2:31 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passwords on the Lab Hi I passed my CCIE Voice written a couple of weeks ago and will start to build a lab. Does any one know usernames/passwords used on the lab? Would want to use the same in my own lab. /Maciej ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- Message: 4 Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 20:43:43 +0200 (CEST) From: Maciej Karpinski To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passwords on the Lab Message-ID: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed ahhh, didn't think about the NDA, thanks for your answer. /Maciej On Thu, 14 Oct 2010, Steve Denney (stdenney) wrote: > Congratulations on passing your written. > > Even if someone did know the usernames/passwords, to post them would be > in violation of NDA. > Just use something short and simple for your own lab, such as "admin | > cisc0123". > > cheers, sd > > > > -Original Message- > From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com > [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Maciej > Karpinski > Sent: T
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 56, "H323 GW on the CUCM Doesn't Prefix "+/+1/+1212" for any ISDN Type Numbering Plan
Hi All, I was doing Lab 5 and was following Vik and tried doing the same configuration on the CUCM where I have H323 GW to HQ PSTN and MGCP to BR1/SITEB PSTN. I noticed a strange behavior when I had to prefix for +1212 for Globalizaing the Calling Party of HQ PSTN to +12123942123 for type Subscriber it never worked at all. From the CCM Trace I can see that the Configuration was successfully processed and updated however the +1212 doesn't get prefixed to the calls coming in thru the H323 GW. I further tested for the MGCP Gateways and it works flawless. I tried doing the same on the Service Parameter and it works and now the problem is I have HQ & BR1 sending 7 Digits Caller ID and I have to prefix +1212 on the HQ Side & +1617 on the BR1 Side which I cannot if I have to update this parameter globally I can only do this if the PSTN is sending me 10 Digits where in I just have to prefix +1 to Globalize the Calling Party Number. I apply the +1212 on the H323 GW once again and from the Trace it is evident that the CM processes the configuration CLID::StandAloneCluster> 10/14/2010 11:19:32.166 CCM|Cnf Received: processconfig U 21d7ecf7-2d54-4cc6-aff3-19ea44028de6, size(949) paramvalue(/+1212) | 10/14/2010 11:19:32.172 CCM|ProcessCnf N: processconfig U 21d7ecf7-2d54-4cc6-aff3-19ea44028de6, size(949) paramvalue(/+1212) | But the Phone only displays 3942123 Now I will configure the +1212 Prefix Globally in the Service Parameters & leave the +1617 on the MGCP as it is and verify the trace once again. 10/14/2010 11:32:10.379 CCM|SPROC::prependCallingPtyNum - Calling number 3942123 is prepended with subscriber prefix +1212, updated calling party number=+12123942123| 10/14/2010 11:32:10.379 CCM| LocalizeCgpnAndSendOutpulsedNumber: StationCdpc on device SEP0022555EF776 , CSS = ,useDevicePoolCgpnCss =1 AlternateCgpn(global)=+12123942123 cgpn=+12123942123| 10/14/2010 11:32:10.379 CCM|StationCdpc:CcSetupReq - unicodeConnectedUnicodeDisplayName='' asciiConnectedDisplayName='HQ-PSTN'| 10/14/2010 11:32:10.379 CCM|StationCdpc:CcSetupReq - unicodeCallingPartyName='' asciiCallingPartyName='HQ-PSTN' callingParty='+12123942123' unicodeCalledPartyName='HQPH1' asciiCalledPartyName='HQPH1' calledParty='5001' cgIP=IpAddr.type:0 ipv4Addr:0x(0.0.0.0) | GW, the calls that came thru HQ GW displayed as +12123942123 for the Calling Party Number whereas the Calls that came through Site B PSTN (MGCP) the calls were prefixed with +1212+16178631001. This is a disaster. Alternatively I tried configure a Voice Translation Rules in the lines as shown below on the HQ Router voice translation-rule 1 rule 1 /^\(.\)/ /+1212\1/ type subscriber subscriber plan any isdn rule 2 /^\(.\)/ /+1\1/ type national national plan any isdn ! voice translation-profile pstn-calling translate calling 1 ! dial-peer voice 12 voip translation-profile outgoing pstn-calling destination-pattern 2123945... Result: - In this case the Router was sending +12123942123 & +16178632683 but the Phone displayed only 12123942123 & 16178632683. HQ-SITE# 89: *Oct 14 19:54:23.371 UTC: //-1//RXRULE/regxrule_get_profile_from_trunkgroup_internal: Voice port 0x48A13C28 does not belong to any trunk group 90: *Oct 14 19:54:23.371 UTC: //-1//RXRULE/regxrule_get_profile_from_trunkgroup_internal: Voice port 0x48A13C28 does not belong to any trunk group 91: *Oct 14 19:54:23.371 UTC: //-1/AD1DA36F8005/RXRULE/regxrule_stack_pop_RegXruleNumInfo: stack=0x49631030; count=1 92: *Oct 14 19:54:23.375 UTC: //-1/AD1DA36F8005/RXRULE/regxrule_stack_pop_callinfo_internal: numinfo=0x49509024 93: *Oct 14 19:54:23.375 UTC: //-1/AD1DA36F8005/RXRULE/regxrule_stack_push_RegXruleNumInfo_internal: stack=0x49631030; count=1 94: *Oct 14 19:54:23.379 UTC: //-1/AD1DA36F8005/RXRULE/regxrule_stack_push_RegXruleNumInfo_internal: stack=0x49631030; count=2 95: *Oct 14 19:54:23.379 UTC: //-1/AD1DA36F8005/RXRULE/regxrule_profile_translate_internal: number=3942123 type=subscriber plan=isdn numbertype=calling 96: *Oct 14 19:54:23.379 UTC: //-1/AD1DA36F8005/RXRULE/regxrule_profile_match_internal: Matched with rule 1 in ruleset 1 97: *Oct 14 19:54:23.379 UTC: //-1/AD1DA36F8005/RXRULE/regxrule_profile_match_internal: Matched with rule 1 in ruleset 1 98: *Oct 14 19:54:23.379 UTC: //-1/AD1DA36F8005/RXRULE/sed_subst: Successful substitution; pattern=3942123 matchPattern=^(.) replacePattern=+1212\1 replaced pattern=+12123942123 99: *Oct 14 19:54:23.379 UTC: //-1/AD1DA36F8005/RXRULE/regxrule_subst_num_type: Match Type = subscriber, Replace Type = subscriber Input Type = subscriber 000100: *Oct 14 19:54:23.379 UTC: //-1/AD1DA36F8005/RXRULE/regxrule_subst_num_plan: Match Plan HQ-SITE#= any, Replace Plan = isdn Input Plan = isdn 000101: *Oct 14 19:54:23.379 UTC: //-1/AD1DA36F8005/RXRULE/regxrule_profile_translate_internal: xlt_number=+12123942123 xlt_type=subscriber xlt_plan=isdn 000102: *Oct 14 1
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Call Handler Operation
Hello Experts, Regarding call handler When making a Call Handler on UC, I'm creating a system call handler ,assign it a dn and then create a CTI RP on ccm and check the checkmark of CFW ALL to voicemail , Now here is the sitiuationsometimes it works and the call successfully go to the call handler and play the opening greeting ( which is the default one) which is happened rarely with me but most of the time it give me that---> " Sorry, call handler name is not available, record your message @ the tone blah blah blah " .i dont understand i read all the documents and all are describing the same steps. The strang thing is that if i add the same extension to the built-in opening greeting ,vola it works and give me the prompt for opening greeting , why is that happening and how to configure this in a right way. Please Help Best regards, Amr Sherif Senior Network Voice Engineer CCNA,CCNP,CCVP and CCIE Voice Written (Certified) CCIE Voice Lab (In Progress) ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passwords on the Lab
ahhh, didn't think about the NDA, thanks for your answer. /Maciej On Thu, 14 Oct 2010, Steve Denney (stdenney) wrote: Congratulations on passing your written. Even if someone did know the usernames/passwords, to post them would be in violation of NDA. Just use something short and simple for your own lab, such as "admin | cisc0123". cheers, sd -Original Message- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Maciej Karpinski Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 2:31 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passwords on the Lab Hi I passed my CCIE Voice written a couple of weeks ago and will start to build a lab. Does any one know usernames/passwords used on the lab? Would want to use the same in my own lab. /Maciej ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passwords on the Lab
Congratulations on passing your written. Even if someone did know the usernames/passwords, to post them would be in violation of NDA. Just use something short and simple for your own lab, such as "admin | cisc0123". cheers, sd -Original Message- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Maciej Karpinski Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 2:31 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passwords on the Lab Hi I passed my CCIE Voice written a couple of weeks ago and will start to build a lab. Does any one know usernames/passwords used on the lab? Would want to use the same in my own lab. /Maciej ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passwords on the Lab
Hi I passed my CCIE Voice written a couple of weeks ago and will start to build a lab. Does any one know usernames/passwords used on the lab? Would want to use the same in my own lab. /Maciej ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE 7.0.3 ivr license installation failed
hello mate , how did u finally fix the problem? brunoHi , I got a strange problem when trying to install ivr license file , anybody face this before ? Downloading ftp cue-vm-license_4port_ivr_7.0.3.pkg Bytes downloaded : 3319 Validating package signature ... done compatibility mode Validating installed manifests .complete. The system will be brought to offline state for a brief period and will be brought back to online state automatically No work order produced. The system is back in online state 55296+0 records in 108+0 records out ERROR - Hot Installation failed. Cyrus -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] class-based shaping with compression
Hello, there are 2 old posts on that topic - I did follow them, however. With bellow config on my 2 rtrs the CRTP 'show policy-map int' counter still shows ZERO. I reloaded, reapplied. Pls have a look and advice for the direction... thanks! There is match on the voice class. IOS is 12.4(20)T. Thanks!@@ class-map match-all Voice match ip dscp ef class-map match-any Signaling match ip dscp cs3 match ip dscp af31 policy-map WAN-EDGE class Voice priority 24 compress header ip rtp class Signaling bandwidth 18 class class-default fair-queue policy-map MQC-FRTS-768 class class-default shape average 364800 3648 0 service-policy WAN-EDGE map-class frame-relay FR-MAP-CLASS-768 frame-relay fragment 480 service-policy output MQC-FRTS-768 ! interface Serial2/0.12 point-to-point ip address 10.1.121.1 255.255.255.252 frame-relay interface-dlci 102 class FR-MAP-CLASS-768 ---show policy-map int - do show policy-map int Serial0/2/0.1: DLCI 101 - Service-policy output: MQC-FRTS-768 Class-map: class-default (match-any) 6913 packets, 445780 bytes 5 minute offered rate 4000 bps, drop rate 0 bps Match: any Queueing queue limit 64 packets (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0 (pkts output/bytes output) 6913/445780 shape (average) cir 364800, bc 3648, be 0 target shape rate 364800 lower bound cir 0, adapt to fecn 0 Service-policy : WAN-EDGE queue stats for all priority classes: Queueing queue limit 64 packets (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0 (pkts output/bytes output) 6655/425920 Class-map: Voice (match-all) 6655 packets, 425920 bytes 5 minute offered rate 4000 bps, drop rate 0 bps Match: ip dscp ef (46) Priority: 24 kbps, burst bytes 1500, b/w exceed drops: 0 compress: header ip rtp UDP/RTP (compression on, Cisco, RTP) Sent:0 total, 0 compressed, 0 bytes saved, 0 bytes sent rate 0 bps Class-map: Signaling (match-any) 160 packets, 8360 bytes 5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps Match: ip dscp cs3 (24) 160 packets, 8360 bytes 5 minute rate 0 bps Match: ip dscp af31 (26) 0 packets, 0 bytes 5 minute rate 0 bps Queueing queue limit 64 packets (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0 (pkts output/bytes output) 160/8360 bandwidth 18 kbps Class-map: class-default (match-any) 98 packets, 11500 bytes 5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps Match: any Queueing queue limit 64 packets (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops/flowdrops) 0/0/0/0 (pkts output/bytes output) 98/11500 Fair-queue: per-flow queue limit 16 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco VPN client (error resaon 433)
I use Software VPN client to connect to proctorlabs, i have been receiving ERROR REASON 433 for the past 1 hour, i have been locked out of my lab session. please i will appreciate any assistance. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
