Dave Parrish - Orange Business Services - +1 651 485 2789 - Sent from my Samsung Epic™ 4G
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com wrote: >Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to > ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com > >You can reach the person managing the list at > ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: CallManager and CUE - Ports not registering (ccieid1ot) > 2. Re: Configuration examples (Jon 1992) > 3. RE?: VIA zone when no Zone prefix is configured! > (Friderich Claude) > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Message: 1 >Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 22:46:17 -0600 >From: ccieid1ot <ccieid...@gmail.com> >To: Justin Brady <jbr...@tsginc.biz> >Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> >Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CallManager and CUE - Ports not > registering >Message-ID: > <AANLkTi=0j_tknn1r47+45jkkskd8uunkaewptefam...@mail.gmail.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > >Can your cue ping ccm and vice versa? > >duy >ccie #27737 voice > >tmobile g2 >On Jan 23, 2011 4:06 PM, "Justin Brady" <jbr...@tsginc.biz> wrote: >> All, >> >> I've tried to integrate CUE with CM on 2 different pods now and I'm >getting the same problem The Jtapi ports just aren't registering. Below is >the CUE config and some output. My CUE works beautifully when in SRST mode >(call-manager-fallback and CMEasSRST). MWI does too. >> >> For my callmanager piece, I am 100% certain the username/password of the >application user matches up between the CM and CUE. It has the CTI ports and >CTI Route Point associated with the user and it's in the Standard CTI >enabled group >> I have tried all combination of things on the cti route point and ports. I >started with just extensions in the <none> partition all the way up to >filling out partitions, DP's, CSS's, etc etc and nothing works. >> I have followed the Cisco doc and the IPExpert proctor guides on several >different labs to a T and it still won't work. >> >> FYI, I am ONLY registering it to the Subscriber because I am using EZVPN >and I want my BR2 site to only register with the Sub so I can stop the CM >service and test SRST. However, on my previous attempt, I had both the Pub >and Sub in there with the same problem. >> >> Other things I have tried after scouring the web and OSL's archives: >> >> n Removing the ccn configs manually, re-adding them and reloading >> >> n Reloading at least 5 times for other various reasons >> >> n Changing the app user ID from cue to cuejtapi >> >> n Changing the password from cisco to 12345 on the account >> >> n Clicked on verify on the CUE GUI and got successful on web and jtapi >login >> >> What on earth am I missing (or am I running into some kind of bug)? I have >had this work before, but not the last 2 times I've tried. >> >> CUE# show ccn subsystem jtapi >> Cisco Call Manager: 10.10.210.11 >> CCM JTAPI Username: cuejtapi >> CCM JTAPI Password: ***** <--This is cisco >> Call Control Group 1 CTI ports: 3601,3602 >> Call Control Group 1 MWI port: >> CSS for redirects from route points: ccm-default >> CSS for redirects from CTI ports: redirecting-party >> >> CUE# show ccn status ccm-manager >> >> JTAPI Subsystem is not registered with any Call Manager >> >> >> >> CONFIGURATION >> I've removed what I think are the irrelevant parts of the configs so if >you see something missing, please point it out. >> hostname CUE >> >> ip domain-name cue.com >> >> username sitecphone3 create >> username sitecphone2 create >> username sitecphone1 create >> username admin create >> >> username sitecphone3 phonenumber "3003" >> username sitecphone2 phonenumber "3002" >> username sitecphone1 phonenumber "3001" >> >> ccn application ciscomwiapplication aa >> description "ciscomwiapplication" >> enabled >> maxsessions 6 >> script "setmwi.aef" >> parameter "CallControlGroupID" "0" >> parameter "strMWI_OFF_DN" "8001" >> parameter "strMWI_ON_DN" "8000" >> end application >> >> ccn application msgnotification aa >> description "msgnotification" >> enabled >> maxsessions 6 >> script "msgnotify.aef" >> parameter "logoutUri" " >http://localhost/voicemail/vxmlscripts/mbxLogout.jsp"; >> parameter "DelayBeforeSendDTMF" "1" >> end application >> >> ccn application voicemail aa >> description "voicemail" >> enabled >> maxsessions 6 >> script "voicebrowser.aef" >> parameter "logoutUri" " >http://localhost/voicemail/vxmlscripts/mbxLogout.jsp"; >> parameter "uri" "http://localhost/voicemail/vxmlscripts/login.vxml"; >> end application >> >> ccn engine >> end engine >> >> ccn subsystem jtapi >> ctiport 3601 3602 >> ccm-manager address 10.10.210.11 >> ccm-manager credentials hidden >"kqp8kECeSyAj1Zqu00cTvQ4E0vzCD5YHSd8ZZNgd+Y9J3xlk2B35j0nfGWTYHfmPSd8ZZNgd+Y9J3xlk2B35j0nfGWTYHfmPSd8ZZNgd+Y9J3xlk2B35j0nfGWTYHfmP" >> end subsystem >> >> ccn subsystem sip >> gateway address "10.10.202.1" >> mwi sip unsolicited >> end subsystem >> >> ccn trigger http urlname msgnotifytrg >> application "msgnotification" >> enabled >> maxsessions 2 >> end trigger >> >> ccn trigger http urlname mwiapp >> application "ciscomwiapplication" >> enabled >> maxsessions 1 >> end trigger >> >> ccn trigger jtapi phonenumber 3600 >> application "voicemail" >> enabled >> maxsessions 6 >> end trigger >> >> ccn trigger sip phonenumber 3600 >> application "voicemail" >> enabled >> maxsessions 6 >> end trigger >> >> voicemail broadcast recording time 300 >> voicemail default messagesize 240 >> voicemail notification restriction msg-notification >> voicemail operator telephone 3001 >> voicemail mailbox owner "sitecphone1" size 2964 >> end mailbox >> voicemail mailbox owner "sitecphone2" size 2964 >> end mailbox >> voicemail mailbox owner "sitecphone3" size 2964 >> end mailbox >> end >> >> Justin >-------------- next part -------------- >An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >URL: </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20110123/3d5e7506/attachment-0001.html> > >------------------------------ > >Message: 2 >Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:44:50 +0900 >From: "Jon 1992" <jon1...@hotmail.com> >To: "Semyon Taskin" <semyon.tas...@gmail.com>, > <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> >Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Configuration examples >Message-ID: <blu111-ds3ae01dcb4e4913b0f82ada7...@phx.gbl> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > >Semyon > >If you received errors on the page, and did not have access to a pdf or other >admin documentation during your lab, and the proctor knew this, and didnt fix >it, open a case and attempt to get a refund. > >Jon > >From: Semyon Taskin >Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 3:18 PM >To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Configuration examples > >Guys, > >Are we allowed to use configuration examples - the ones in official cisco >online documentation provided in the exam? > >-- >Regards, >Semyon > > > >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >_______________________________________________ >For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >visit www.ipexpert.com >-------------- next part -------------- >An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >URL: </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20110124/eb8410b1/attachment-0001.html> > >------------------------------ > >Message: 3 >Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 07:45:27 +0100 >From: "Friderich Claude" <cfrider...@netcore.lu> >To: "Shrini" <linuxbos...@gmail.com>, "Rahul Kapor" > <rahul.kapo...@gmail.com> >Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RE?: VIA zone when no Zone prefix is > configured! >Message-ID: > <f8e9744fcd82e14bb85dc1936b0eacb115c...@exchange2000.sysgrp.org> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > >hi Shrini > >Correct. but if u take a look on my dial-peer 1500 on cme you can see that >tech prefix and ras have been configured ;-) > >of course you have the choice to put your translation in your ccm instead of >the cube > >Concerning zone prefix, I think that Rahul didn't want to use zone prefix and >just wanted to match the tech-prefix > >but I agree with u, when you are going to use zone prefix it's better to put >gw priority in your zone prefix > >Best Regards > >Claude > > >-------- Message d'origine-------- >De: Shrini [mailto:linuxbos...@gmail.com] >Date: lun. 1/24/2011 2:38 >?: Friderich Claude; 'Rahul Kapor' >Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >Objet : RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VIA zone when no Zone prefix is configured! > >Hi Claude, > >Nice explained, small correction the dialpeer on CUCME should target to GK, >"session target ras" and tech-prefix 1# >voice class h323 is not needed in the dialpeer > >1#5001 can be filtered at gateway level on CUCM setting incoming called >number length to 4. > >optionally you may add zone prefix GK 5... gw-priority 10 cucm-trunk_2 or >cucm-trunk_1 (if you want to use pub./sub as priority else the call will go >round robbin) > >Please correct me if wrong. > >Thanks >Shrini > _____ > >From: Friderich Claude [mailto:cfrider...@netcore.lu] >Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 4:08 PM >To: Rahul Kapor; Shrini >Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VIA zone when no Zone prefix is configured! > > >Hi Rahul, > >I see that you progress and call is working one way ;-) > >Regarding your output I see that : > >You have defined a tech-prefix 1# for VIA zone and CUCM trunks that's fine > >For your config just change the 5 beginning number in my example with your >dialed number >In my case I want to dial 5001 in ccm from ccme > > > > >CME -----------------------> VIA --------------------------> CCM > Dp 1500 dp5000 > > >On CME >dial-peer voice 1500 voip > destination-pattern [15]...$ > session target ras > tech-prefix 1# --------------------> put this tech-prefix to have a match > dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric > no vad > >zone prefix is not going to match because there is none zone prefix defined >local zone = destination zone > > >on gatekeeper don't forget to put the gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology >command to have a match > >on VIA Router >dial-peer voice 5002 voip > incoming called-number 1#5...$ > dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric > no vad > >But CCM does not understand 1#5.$ because my dialplan begins with 5XXX. You >have to translate this number to 5. >Put for example in the via router the command num-exp 1#5. 5. >Or configure a translation pattern in the call manager > >Finally you match the dial-peer voice to the call manger, something like >dial-peer voice 5000 voip > destination-pattern ^5...$ > voice-class codec 1 > voice-class h323 1 > session target ipv4:10.10.210.11 > incoming called-number . > dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric > no vad > >And call should success . > >Hope so . > >Regards >Claude. > >Claude Friderich >PreSales Support >ccvp_voice_sm >NETCORE PSF S.A. >49 rue du Baerendall >B.P.65 L-8201 Mamer >T?l?phone: 31 33 80-407 >Fax: 31 33 80 8-407 >GSM: 621 303 616 >E-mail: <mailto:cfrider...@netcore.lu> cfrider...@netcore.lu > >From: Rahul Kapor [mailto:rahul.kapo...@gmail.com] >Sent: dimanche 23 janvier 2011 18:18 >To: Shrini >Cc: Friderich Claude; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VIA zone when no Zone prefix is configured! > >Hi Mates , > > >my call from CUCM to CME working fine but CME to CUCM is failing > > >here is the details > >CM-gateway#sh gatekeeper endpoints > GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION > ================================ >CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port Zone Name Type Flags >--------------- ----- --------------- ----- --------- ---- ----- >14.160.108.10 33252 14.160.108.10 32861 CUCM VOIP-GW > ENDPOINT-ID: 6A0BC2E800000004 VERSION: 5 AGE: 3 secs SupportsAnnexE: >FALSE > g_supp_prots: 0x00000050 > H323-ID: trunk_1 > Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 >14.160.108.20 56536 14.160.108.20 32783 CUCM VOIP-GW > ENDPOINT-ID: 6AB6526400000004 VERSION: 5 AGE: 3 secs SupportsAnnexE: >FALSE > g_supp_prots: 0x00000050 > H323-ID: trunk_2 > Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 >14.160.110.130 1720 14.160.110.130 58944 CME H323-GW > ENDPOINT-ID: 6A0B4F4000000001 VERSION: 4 AGE: 25 secs SupportsAnnexE: >FALSE > g_supp_prots: 0x00000050 > H323-ID: POD > E164-ID: 2222 > Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 >14.160.110.254 1720 14.160.110.254 61745 VIA H323-GW > ENDPOINT-ID: 6A605EB000000004 VERSION: 4 AGE: 25 secs SupportsAnnexE: >FALSE > g_supp_prots: 0x00000050 > H323-ID: CUBE > Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 >Total number of active registrations = 4 > >CM-gateway#sh gatek gw >buffer used: 311, size: 20480 >GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE >========================= >Prefix: 86#* > Zone VIA master gateway list: > 14.160.110.254:1720 CUBE > Zone CME master gateway list: > 14.160.110.130:1720 POD >Prefix: 1#* > Zone VIA master gateway list: > 14.160.110.254:1720 CUBE > Zone CUCM master gateway list: > 14.160.108.10:33252 trunk_1 > 14.160.108.20:56536 trunk_2 > > zone local HQ cisco.com 14.160.110.254 > zone local CUCM cisco.com invia VIA outvia VIA > zone local CME cisco.com invia VIA outvia VIA > zone local VIA cisco.com > > >Zone prefix is not used > >dial-peer voice 100 voip > destination-pattern 86T > session target ipv4:14.160.115.200 // once call is received by CUBE from >cucm , it is sending it CME directly > incoming called-number . >dial-peer voice 200 voip > destination-pattern 1T > session target ipv4:14.160.108.20 // once call is received from CME , cube >is sending this to cucm directly. I am by passing gatekeep here > >enabled debug voice ccapi and found that dial-p 200 is hit but cucm is >disconnecting the call > >not sure why :( >Please suggest ..bit urgent > >Regards, >Mritunjay > > > > > > > >On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Shrini <linuxbos...@gmail.com> wrote: >Few basic things I want to include here. > > >HQ# Gatekeeper >zone local US cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> 10.10.110.1 >zone local UK cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> > > >Now you register CUCM using US zone and you can use the same zone for CUCME >G/w registration too. > >On CUCME you will say , whatever h323 id you give one g/w it will register >to that zone. > >For VIA and IPIPGW > >On HQ router you say that I know a gatekeeper (VIA) and I will register to >it as IPIPGW h323-id > >HQ gatekeeper know a remote zone called PSTN-WAN with zone prefix 91* >zone remote PSTN-WAN 10.10.110.4 > >Whatever the calls I am sending to 91* I will send to PSTN-WAN GK via VIA > >Hope this helps. > >-S > >On 1/13/2011 1:26 AM, Rahul Kapor wrote: >Hi Claude , > >thanks for analysis ! > >when CUCM and CME are registered with same Zone name and VIA zone is not >configured , it works fine. bcos , target zone is set to source zone and >that zone is registered with tech prefix #86 (CME) but issue with only VIA >zone. > >for following config > >for config "Zone local CUCM........ . . . . VIA enable-intra Zone" > >bit confused about this .. >shoud cucm and CME be registered with single Zone and CUBE should be >registered with VIA with tech-prefix? > >Please elaborate . > >thx, >Rahul > > > > > > > >On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Friderich Claude <cfrider...@netcore.lu> >wrote: >Rahul, > >In your attached document, if I take into account the first gk config >gatekeeper > zone local CUCM cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> 14.160.110.254 > zone local HQ cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> > zone local VIA cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> > zone local CME cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> outvia VIA > no shutdown > > >As you can see, you have on debug h225 asn1 a reject message . value >RasMessage ::= admissionReject : > >In debug gatekeeper main 10 > >Step 1 matches tech-prefix 86# >Step 2 doesn't match a zone prefix and you will never use the VIA zone >configured above zone local CME cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> outvia VIA. >Instead, your target zone is going to be the local zone which is CUCM >Modify your config to match the local zone CME just for testing > >For a one zone config, you can try to add enable-intra zone: >zone local CUCM cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> 14.160.110.254 outvia VIA >enable-intra zone > >After that call setup goes incoming to the cube and the again from the cube >outgoing to the cucme with digit manipulation to discard the tech-prefix ... >But again, try to match the local zone CME first just to keep it simple. >After you can try with a single zone. > >Regards, > >Claude Friderich >PreSales Support >ccvp_voice_sm >NETCORE PSF S.A. >49 rue du Baerendall >B.P.65 L-8201 Mamer >T?l?phone: 31 33 80-407 >Fax: 31 33 80 8-407 >GSM: 621 303 616 >E-mail: <mailto:cfrider...@netcore.lu> cfrider...@netcore.lu > >From: Rahul Kapor [mailto:rahul.kapo...@gmail.com] >Sent: mardi 11 janvier 2011 16:35 > >To: Friderich Claude >Cc: ccieid1ot; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VIA zone when no Zone prefix is configured! > >Hi Claude , > >i am sending one file but each debug ie gate main 10 , h225 asn1 and debug >ras are separated. > >two scenario is mentioned/ for each scenario, made three call for each >scenario , each with diff debug > >hope this will help :) > >thx, >Rahul >On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Friderich Claude <cfrider...@netcore.lu> >wrote: >Thanks Rahul > >Can you please make a call and debug gatekeeper main 10 in one file and >after that another call and debug h225 asn1 in another file and please debug >ras could be fine in a 3rd file just for decimal output J > >Thanks in advance > >Just to better see the traces separately ;-) > > > >Claude Friderich >PreSales Support >Image removed >by sender. ccvp_voice_sm >NETCORE PSF S.A. >49 rue du Baerendall >B.P.65 L-8201 Mamer >T?l?phone: 31 33 80-407 >Fax: 31 33 80 8-407 >GSM: 621 303 616 >E-mail: <mailto:cfrider...@netcore.lu> cfrider...@netcore.lu > >From: Rahul Kapor [mailto:rahul.kapo...@gmail.com] >Sent: mardi 11 janvier 2011 15:24 > >To: Friderich Claude >Cc: ccieid1ot; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VIA zone when no Zone prefix is configured! > >Hi Claude , > >Here is the summary , attaching the file which has debug > >gatekeeper > zone local CUCM cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> 14.160.110.254 > zone local HQ cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> > zone local VIA cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> > zone local CME cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> outvia VIA > > same gateway , dial-peer > dial-peer voice 100 voip > destination-pattern .T > session target ras > incoming called-number . > > call from cucm to CME failed > >in debug , gateway based on tech prefix failed > >new config > >gatekeeper > zone local CUCM cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> 14.160.110.254 invia VIA >outvia VIA > zone local HQ cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> > zone local VIA cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> > zone local CME cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> invia VIA outvia VIA > no shutdown > > dial-peer on cube >same as above , >in this case gatek is returning CUBE IP address but when CUBE is sending >ARQ , call is in loop and > it failed. > > >since CUBE is receiving the call , bypassing the GK by new dial-peer > >dial-peer voice 200 voip > > destination-pattern 86T > session target ipv4:14.160.115.200 // sending my call to CME , by passing >GK > incoming called-number 86#T > >and this is working ! > >outputs and debug are in file. > >thx, >Rahul > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Friderich Claude <cfrider...@netcore.lu> >wrote: >Rahul, > >Not enough info for me. >Put your debug gatekeeper main 10 and debug h225 asn1 on your email, this >can help debugging > >Can you confirm that you use the via zone in the debug gatekeeper main 10 ? >And I see that you are using tech-prefixes, no default-tech prefix, so have >to check if there is no digit manipulation mistakes .. But better to see the >debugs. I have made a lot of mistakes before and debugs help me to find out >where I was wrong > >Regards >Claude. > >Claude Friderich >PreSales Support >Image removed by sender. Image >removed by sender. ccvp_voice_sm >NETCORE PSF S.A. >49 rue du Baerendall >B.P.65 L-8201 Mamer >T?l?phone: 31 33 80-407 >Fax: 31 33 80 8-407 >GSM: 621 303 616 >E-mail: <mailto:cfrider...@netcore.lu> cfrider...@netcore.lu > >From: Rahul Kapor [mailto:rahul.kapo...@gmail.com] >Sent: mardi 11 janvier 2011 10:50 >To: Friderich Claude >Cc: ccieid1ot; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > >Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VIA zone when no Zone prefix is configured! > >Hi Claude , > >i cehcked with outvia with CME but did not help either >but i guess Invia can be configured which is matched against the source >zone. i have tested it several times and found > >zone local <source- zone> domain invia is equivalent to > >zone local <destination-zone> domain outvia >in both case , call are sent to cube. > >thx, >Rahul > > > > > >On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Friderich Claude <cfrider...@netcore.lu> >wrote: >Hi Rahul, > >Regarding your config, your gatekeeper is configured with local zones and >your are not using remote zones .. Right ? >I ask you this question because I see something wrong on your config if just >local zones are configured. > >gatekeeper > zone local CUCM <http://cisco.com/> cisco.com 10.160.110.254 invia VIA > >I guess you want to call from CUCM to CUCME.. So in this way you call from >CUCM TO CUCME via that Via zone and your config has to be : > >Gatekeeper >Zone local CME Cisco.com outvia VIA > >Invia VIA is used for remote zones to connect to a remote gatekeeper > >Hope this is going to help . > >Regards, > >Claude. > >Claude Friderich >PreSales Support >Image removed by sender. >Image removed by sender. Image >removed by sender. >ccvp_voice_sm >NETCORE PSF S.A. >49 rue du Baerendall >B.P.65 L-8201 Mamer >T?l?phone: 31 33 80-407 >Fax: 31 33 80 8-407 >GSM: 621 303 616 >E-mail: <mailto:cfrider...@netcore.lu> cfrider...@netcore.lu > >From: Rahul Kapor [mailto:rahul.kapo...@gmail.com] >Sent: mardi 11 janvier 2011 06:59 >To: ccieid1ot; Friderich Claude >Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VIA zone when no Zone prefix is configured! > >Hi mates , >thx for helping. > >I did the same thing that u explained but still not working > >here is the config and outputs > >CallSignalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port Zone Name Type Flags >--------------- ----- --------------- ----- --------- ---- ----- >10.16.108.10 1720 10.16.108.10 36978 CUCM VOIP-GW > ENDPOINT-ID: 6A0E13DC00000004 VERSION: 5 AGE: 14 secs SupportsAnnexE: >FALSE > g_supp_prots: 0x00000050 > H323-ID: gk-trunk_1 > Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 >10.16.108.20 1720 14.16.108.20 32790 CUCM VOIP-GW > ENDPOINT-ID: 69FC5C0C00000004 VERSION: 5 AGE: 15 secs SupportsAnnexE: >FALSE > g_supp_prots: 0x00000050 > H323-ID: gk-trunk_2 > Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 >10.16.110.130 1720 14.16.110.130 50026 CME H323-GW > ENDPOINT-ID: 6817AF0800000004 VERSION: 4 AGE: 40 secs SupportsAnnexE: >FALSE > g_supp_prots: 0x00000050 > H323-ID: PD-CME > Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 >10.16.11.254 1720 14.160.11.254 59883 VIA H323-GW > ENDPOINT-ID: 6A14A5D000000003 VERSION: 4 AGE: 43 secs SupportsAnnexE: >FALSE > g_supp_prots: 0x00000050 > H323-ID: MJ-CUBE > Voice Capacity Max.= Avail.= Current.= 0 >Total number of active registrations = 4 > > > >========================= >Prefix: 1#* > Zone CUCM master gateway list: > 10.16.108.10:1720 <http://10.16.108.10:1720/> gk-trunk_1 > 10.16.108.20:1720 <http://10.16.108.20:1720/> gk-trunk_2 > Zone VIA master gateway list: > 10.160.110.254:1720 <http://10.160.110.254:1720/> CUBE > >Prefix: 86#* > Zone CME master gateway list: > 10.16.110.130:1720 <http://10.16.110.130:1720/> PD-CME > Zone VIA master gateway list: > 10.16.110.254:1720 <http://10.16.110.254:1720/> CUBE > > >gatekeeper > zone local CUCM cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> 10.160.110.254 invia VIA > > zone local VIA cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> > zone local CME cisco.com <http://cisco.com/> > > > > >cucm is reg with 1# and CME with 86# tech prefix > > > >cucm is sending 86#8001 > > >Via zone is reg with 1# and 86# with/ without. its not working > >when i add zone prefix (with / without VIA Zone ) > >ie zone prefix CME 8... >then its working fine ! > >GK and CUBE on same router. > > >Please suggest. > >thx, >Rahul > > > > > >On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:06 PM, ccieid1ot <ccieid...@gmail.com> wrote: >Correct. Configure it with zone local gk (IP ADD) via gk or any other gk >zone. >duy >ccie #27737 voice >tmobile g2 >On Jan 10, 2011 8:07 AM, "Rahul Kapor" <rahul.kapo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ >For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >visit www.ipexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/> > > >-------------- next part -------------- >An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >URL: </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20110124/8ec7912a/attachment.html> >-------------- next part -------------- >A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >Name: image001.gif >Type: image/gif >Size: 4005 bytes >Desc: image001.gif >URL: </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20110124/8ec7912a/attachment.gif> >-------------- next part -------------- >A non-text attachment was scrubbed... >Name: image002.jpg >Type: image/jpeg >Size: 407 bytes >Desc: image002.jpg >URL: </archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20110124/8ec7912a/attachment.jpg> > >------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >CCIE_Voice mailing list >CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com >http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice > > >End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 59, Issue 208 >******************************************* _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
