[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Standard Local RG troubleshooting: RouteGroup :RouteGroup Name= Standard Local Route Group
Hi Folks, I am facing a problem with Standard local route group ..., it is not working and I have no idea where could I troubleshoot it. I configured as usual ... , RL - Standard Local RGIn each DP, I pointed to the respective gateway (using Local Route Group param) and of course each phone with the respective device. I tried by using DNA, but it does not go further , the last point I see is RouteGroup :RouteGroup Name= Standard Local Route Group ..., As far as I know there is nothing in the service param to enable ... or there are something ? Thanks all !___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Standard Local RG troubleshooting: RouteGroup :RouteGroup Name= Standard Local Route Group
Hi Willian , Yes, DNA does not revolve in the 7.X. Do you know if there are any parameter to double check? May be any db table , or something. I have not found any school boy error in the config... Thanks a zillions!Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Standard Local RG troubleshooting: RouteGroup :RouteGroup Name= Standard Local Route Group From: w...@netcraftsmen.net Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 19:45:53 -0500 CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com To: ricardo.pala...@hotmail.com Ricardo, If I follow your question, I believe this is normal. DNA won't resolve Standard Local Route Group to the actual route group assigned to the device's DP. At least in version 7.x. In CUCM 8.5, it does resolve the actual route group name. Regards,Bill On Feb 6, 2012, at 7:05 PM, Ricardo Palaver wrote:Hi Folks, I am facing a problem with Standard local route group ..., it is not working and I have no idea where could I troubleshoot it. I configured as usual ... , RL - Standard Local RG In each DP, I pointed to the respective gateway (using Local Route Group param) and of course each phone with the respective device. I tried by using DNA, but it does not go further , the last point I see is RouteGroup :RouteGroup Name= Standard Local Route Group ..., As far as I know there is nothing in the service param to enable ... or there are something ? Thanks all ! ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Standard Local RG troubleshooting: RouteGroup :RouteGroup Name= Standard Local Route Group
Hi Emanuel !. No , it does not work .. As far as I know, this is for use AAR, or Am I wrong? Thanks ! Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 23:01:14 -0200 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Standard Local RG troubleshooting: RouteGroup :RouteGroup Name= Standard Local Route Group From: aedamasc...@gmail.com To: ricardo.pala...@hotmail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Hello Ricardo, You need to go to Service Parameters Call Manager, and set the option Stop Routing on Unallocated Number Flag to FALSE I hope this helps :)Emanuel Damasceno CCNP Voice On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Ricardo Palaver ricardo.pala...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi Folks, I am facing a problem with Standard local route group ..., it is not working and I have no idea where could I troubleshoot it. I configured as usual ... , RL - Standard Local RG In each DP, I pointed to the respective gateway (using Local Route Group param) and of course each phone with the respective device. I tried by using DNA, but it does not go further , the last point I see is RouteGroup :RouteGroup Name= Standard Local Route Group ..., As far as I know there is nothing in the service param to enable ... or there are something ? Thanks all ! ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ISDN Cause i = 0x80AF - Resource unavailable
Hi Folks., I was in the lab4. Datucha touched in the right point. There is no ISDN problem since local calls was working properly. Unfortunatelly I can check it in the next lab session. Thanks all for helping!. Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 09:34:21 -0500 From: ejzi...@gmail.com To: whl...@gmail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ISDN Cause i = 0x80AF - Resource unavailable Bill what lab are you working on? On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com wrote: OK, if you are sure it is not a ISDN issue but it appears to be that the call is set up Nov 26 22:10:48.504: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX - ALERTING pd = 8 callref = 0x808D Progress Ind i = 0x8188 - In-band info or appropriate now availab you then get Nov 26 22:10:48.548: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX - DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x008D Cause i = 0x80AF - Resource unavailable, unspecified so maybe it is an IOS bug but we don't know what IOS you are running or do we know running config or the status of any of your system. Just guessing here but can you complete any calls over the PSTN connection? If so what type of calls are completed? On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 6:36 AM, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com wrote: Bill, if you will take a dipper look at the Logs of ISDN, you will see the the Router send the ISD SETUP message, then received the Procceding and Alerting message. So the Voice port in operating normally. After the Alert message, the IP Side is starting - H245 is going for negotiation, and there is a problem in H323 IP Side, not in ISDN side. And I have already mentioned the Problem description in my earlier post. If there would the DSP issues, then the SETUP message will not be send even. On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 1:26 AM, Bill Lake whl...@gmail.com wrote: This looks like it could be an ISDN issue: Is your voice-port in an active (not shut down) state? Do you have the proper DSP resources for your configuration? Check these and post your configuration if this is not the issue. On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 1:24 PM, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com wrote: That's because of Codec Problem between HQ router and the CUCM. Now look, as we know, when the CUCM sends the H323 SETUP message to GW, the GW, by default, begins the H245 Address announcement on Alert Message, and at that point the CUCM and GW have exchanged the H245 message, and the GW provides the Ring Back tone. Even when the CUCM is using the Slow Start. Whereas CUCME can detect CUCM and start the H245 only on Connect Message, while the default one idicates h245 address on Alert. CUCME IP Phones cannot provide the In Band Ring Back tones, so that CUCM needs always the Slow start to CUCME, so that CUCM will provide the Local Ringback to its IP Phones until the H245 address is received from CUCME (whereas CUCME will send the H245 address On Connect only to CUCM). Now look, as for you case, you get the error message after the Alerting Message. What does happen at that moment? GW sends the Alert message with H245 Address (and the TCS OLC negotiation begins). CUCM and GW have some problems with Codec negotation, and that's why you get that message. Try to ensure that you use the correct region to GW, and also the correct Codecs (or voice class codec) is configured on the GW. That's the problem of the Codec mismatch. On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Ricardo Palaver ricardo.pala...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi Experts!, I 've already gave up to fix the problem below. I am calling from a HQ - phone # to PSTN (BR2) region but call fails and it's returnning me the cause code: 0x80AF. In the Cisco community I found its an IOS bug, so if it is, someone here have already faced the same issue. Can someone give me any idea on how to fix it ? Thanks a zillions !.. have a great weekend all ! debug isdn q931 is ON. BR2-RTR# Nov 26 22:10:48.460: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: Applying typeplan for sw-type 0x12 is 0x0 0x0, Calling num 2123945001 Nov 26 22:10:48.464: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: Sending SETUP callref = 0x008D callID = 0x800E switch = primary-net5 interface = User Nov 26 22:10:48.464: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX - SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x008D Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A3 Standard = CCITT Transfer Capability = Speech Transfer Mode = Circuit Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s Channel ID i = 0xA98381 Exclusive, Channel 1 Display i = 'HQ Phone 1' Calling Party Number i = 0x0081, '2123945001' Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown Called Party Number i = 0x80, '32141891' Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown Nov 26 22:10:48.500: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX - CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x808D Channel ID i = 0xA98381 Exclusive, Channel 1 Nov 26 22:10:48.504
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] ISDN Cause i = 0x80AF - Resource unavailable
Hi Experts!, I 've already gave up to fix the problem below. I am calling from a HQ - phone # to PSTN (BR2) region but call fails and it's returnning me the cause code: 0x80AF. In the Cisco community I found its an IOS bug, so if it is, someone here have already faced the same issue. Can someone give me any idea on how to fix it ? Thanks a zillions !.. have a great weekend all ! debug isdn q931 is ON. BR2-RTR# Nov 26 22:10:48.460: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: Applying typeplan for sw-type 0x12 is 0x0 0x0, Calling num 2123945001 Nov 26 22:10:48.464: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: Sending SETUP callref = 0x008D callID = 0x800E switch = primary-net5 interface = User Nov 26 22:10:48.464: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX - SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x008D Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A3 Standard = CCITT Transfer Capability = Speech Transfer Mode = Circuit Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s Channel ID i = 0xA98381 Exclusive, Channel 1 Display i = 'HQ Phone 1' Calling Party Number i = 0x0081, '2123945001' Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown Called Party Number i = 0x80, '32141891' Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown Nov 26 22:10:48.500: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX - CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x808D Channel ID i = 0xA98381 Exclusive, Channel 1 Nov 26 22:10:48.504: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX - ALERTING pd = 8 callref = 0x808D Progress Ind i = 0x8188 - In-band info or appropriate now availab BR2-RTR#le Nov 26 22:10:48.548: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX - DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x008D Cause i = 0x80AF - Resource unavailable, unspecified Nov 26 22:10:48.560: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX - RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x808D Nov 26 22:10:48.564: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX - RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x008D ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab loading - ProctorLabs
Hi Dear, Just a quick question. I do not know if is there someone here who uses the proctorlabs ... but .. Is it commum the labs loading be wrong ? An example , I am in the Workbook1 / LAB 4 and I faced that all services in the SUB was down, but per my understanding these services were supposed to be up once the tasks from this lab are not related to this kind of feature. This means that everytime I load a lab configuration I may be suposed to troubleshoot or it is a pod loading error? Thanks all ! ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
