Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] passed CCIE 29606

[Wes Ducote]

Great Job.  Very inspirational for me to keep at it and keep going.
Congrats.

On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Cristobal Priego <
cristobalpri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> hello guys,
>
> My 2 year journey just came to an end. I took my 3rd attempt yesterday in
> San Jose and i just got my score 5 mins ago with good news
> I'm CCIE # 29606
> It was long hours of study time and lab time
> I couldn't afford a home lab so all i did is rent equipment from
> Proctorlabs i was able to get physical phones to test. which was pretty good
>
> my strategy was a bit different from what people usually recommend
>
> I started with Infrastructure of course
> switch config all that needed to be done in the switch including QoS, so i
> could forget about that device
> then i moved to HQ, SiteB and SiteC NTP, vlans, and then QoS right away
> after that i started working on CUE (because i know it takes long time)
> then i moved to PRI configs
> then i started working on configuring my phones, basic config
> then i moved over to VM, then UCCX, then all the features requested
> and at the end i did call routing
>
> something that actually helped me out a lot to improve my speed was
> i created my configs in notepad and i called those my templates, so during
> the week i didn't have access to any rack rental sessions so i was
> practicing in notepad
>
> i did the workbooks 1 and 2 only once then i was using the rack rental
> sessions to practice pretty heavily on a tech basis everthing from inside
> out and every once in a while start adding more technologies
>
> that was my experience i didn't know how to approach this beast at the
> beginning I was reading all the documentation all the pdf's and books and i
> was getting bored
> so i dediced to read all the documentation, pdf's and books on a technology
> basis i printed a calendar and with the blue print on the other hand i
> marked which days i was going to spend studying X item on the blue print so
> by the time it was the weekend i could practice that in my lab sessions
> during the weekend and get as much as i could from the rack rental sessions
>
> thank you very much for all your support and also for my study partners
> from all over the world
> I'll try to help you to get your number as well, you guys helped me, i'm
> going to try to do the same
>
> have a great day !
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] graded lab voice

[Wes Ducote]

How would you rate the feedback that they give?  I spoke to the CCBootcamp
rep and he really tried to push me towards a mentoring session instead of
the graded lab.  That is no supprise as they cost two arms, a leg, and an
eye.  I am caught where b/w work and family I can't really cut out for a
bootcamp but I would really like some graded feedback.

wes

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Maria Bagamanova wrote:

> Here is the link for 360 labs from cisco.com:
> https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-6924
>
> They will provide the secure pdf file which you can print and re-do. Don't
> know the best place to buy labs. I used ccbootcamp as a provider.
>
> The best thing about 360 is with lab's score they will tell you exactly how
> tasks should be done.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Maria
>   On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:35 AM, adam compton  wrote:
>
>> That sounds great!  Where is a good place to order this?  I can't find
>> anything on cisco's website.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Maria Bagamanova 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I used 360 labs, cost is $402 - no discounts. This labs are harder then
>>> real lab.
>>> Planning to buy CIEV-GA-LAB01.
>>>
>>> Maria
>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Joshua Reola wrote:
>>>
 It depends what partner and packages you get.
 https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-7998

 If anyone is interested in purchasing as a group let me know. We can get
 a discount the larger the group, the better. You can find more info on my
 blog.

 JR
 www.joshreola.com


 On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:06 PM, adam compton  wrote:

> How do you purchase that?  Do you know the price?
>
> Adam Compton
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:28 AM, ee 55 wrote:
>
>> hi ,
>>
>> is anybody used cisco voice 360 graded lab before ?  just wondering
>> ,worth to spend money on ?
>>
>> tks
>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>


 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com 

>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ephone-dn-template in CME in SRST mode

[Wes Ducote]

does it make a difference if you change it to auto-provision all?

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Marcelo Alexandria
wrote:

> Hi all,
> i think there is a bug with templates in CME 7.0 with SRST. There is a bug
> in cisco site about CBarge , but another features dont work too.
>  Please , try without templates.
>  update the results ,
>  Marcelo Alexandria
> Ccie Voice #27021
>
>
> --
> Em 06/01/2011 11:02, *Miron Kobelski < findko...@gmail.com >* escreveu:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've seen this too. I subscribe to the question. Any ideas?
>
> Generally, when would you recommend call-manager-fallback and when CME
> SRST? I know CME SRST has more features, but it seems that standard SRST is
> more reliable...
>
> regards
> kobel
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 13:32, Mritunjay Kumar 
> http://mce_host/compose?to=mjs...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> It seems "call-for ward  busy/noan" to voice mail is not working   when
>> call-forward is set through ephone-dn-templte  in CME in SRST mode
>>
>> here is config
>>
>> telephony-service
>> srst mode auto-provision none
>> srst dn template 1
>> srst dn line-mode dual
>> max-ephones 10
>> max-dn 10
>> ip source-address 14.160.116.40 port 2000
>> voicemail 91813555
>> create cnf-files version-stamp Jan 01 2002 00:00:00
>> !
>> !
>> ephone-dn-template  1
>> call-forward busy 91813555
>> call-forward noan 91813555 timeout 3
>>
>>
>> 3001 and 3002 gets registered to SRST. when 3001 calls to 3002 , phones
>> keep on  ringing and call does not get forwarded.
>>
>> is this bug ? i guess workaround would be creating manually ephone-dn and
>> ephone and set the call-forward.
>>
>> Please suggest.
>> Regards,
>> Mritunjay
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Adding subscriber problem - need ideas

[Wes Ducote]

Are the two on the same subnet?

Also have you set the clock to the sub to the same of the pub and try to use
the pub as ntp server?

On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Wael Agina  wrote:

> Dear Rogers,
>
>   yes it is up as i am reaching the pub over the network from another LAN
> subnet and it is pingable.
>
> Do I have to try reloading the pub ? Restart some services ?
>
>
> Regards,
> Wale Agina
>
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Rogers Ochieng 
> wrote:
>
>> Is the default gateway up? I had this error and i just ignored it and
>> proceeded
>>
>>
>> On 26 November 2010 12:21, Wael Agina  wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Rogers,
>>>
>>>   It is new installation with no DNS setup at all.
>>> I havent set any DNS info, and chosed no DNS during installation.
>>> Also when you reach to connectivity test I entered both pub Name and IP
>>> address.
>>>
>>> Still not working and connectivity test fails ?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Wael Agina
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Rogers Ochieng <
>>> rogersochi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
 Off the top of my head, could it be because of DNS resolution of the
 host name? I got that when installing recently on VMWARE and as i didn't
 have DNS setup. I ignored it and continued to setup well


 On 26 November 2010 11:40, Wael Agina  wrote:

> Dear Jason, Shingei,
>
>   I am installing 7.0 CUCM om MCS servers.
> I did reset the passowrd and reload the pub after applying license.
>
> Do you have any good doc. for troubleshooting this issue ?
>
> Regards,
> Wael Agina
>
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Jason Aarons (US) <
> jason.aar...@us.didata.com> wrote:
>
>>  I had this problem with a recent new install of 8.0.2c (it was
>> pre-installed on the hard drive on new MCS server) .   I couldn’t find
>> anything wrong, the password I reset 20 times, etc.
>>
>>
>>
>> I upgraded the pub to 8.0.3a and did a subscriber  install with
>> software update on the subscriber and it worked fine.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
>> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Wael Agina
>> *Sent:* Thursday, November 25, 2010 5:29 PM
>> *To:* Michael Dietrich
>> *Cc:* OSL Group
>> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Adding subscriber problem - need
>> ideas
>>
>>
>>
>> Dearl Michael
>>
>>   First i have applied license for two nodes and only using one and
>> there is one available node on the lices [for sub]
>> Also I set the name with uppercase all lettters and tried on sub both
>> upper case and lower case but not working.
>> I did reset security password many times to cisco12345 on pub and used
>> it on sub but no sccess.
>>
>> Is there any troubleshooting steps can be done on pub during
>> connectivity test on sub ?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Wael Agina
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Michael Dietrich 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Make sure that you are entering the device name of the PUB correctly
>> (spelling) during the SUB set up
>>
>>
>>
>> Make sure the server name for SUB is spelled correctly on the PUB
>> (case sensitive)...AND. that you have a second server license 
>> installed
>> on the PUB, to be used by the SUB
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Wael Agina 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Prashant ,
>>
>>   Yes I added it on the publisher on server list and on the CM Group.
>> But still it fails the connectivity test when installing subscriber
>> software.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Wael Agina
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Prashant Patel <
>> prashantpatel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> Hope you have added the Sub in the list of servers on the Publisher.
>>
>>
>>
>> HTH
>>
>> Prashant
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Wael Agina 
>> wrote:
>>
>>   Dear All,
>>
>>I am implemnting new UC project at one customer location.
>> I installed the first node - publisher - succefully.
>> Now whenevr i add the 2nd node - subscriber - it tried to test
>> connectivity to first node but always fails and installion terminated.
>> There is network connectivity between the two nodes and from publisher
>> i can ping the new node - subscriber.
>> Also I reset the security password on the publisher [using Set *
>> password* user *security on CLI]*
>>
>> Any ideas as the connectivity test always fails ?
>>
>> --
>>
>> Thanks and Best Regards,
>> Wael Agina
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 3B troubleshooting problem

[Wes Ducote]

This may sound elementary but it has caught me before.  Make sure you don't
have auto-reg-ephone enabled on telephony-service.

On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Shrini  wrote:

> Hi Dew,
>
> 1. no create profile
> create profile
>
> After you add DNs and pools run create profile again under global.
>
> 2. debug tftp events
>
> rese the phone and see what it is requesting and is it succeeding.
>
> Else finally
> In the flash: you see below files.
>
> 6 3579 Apr 01 2002 16:18:18 softkeyDefault_kpml.xml
> 7 3613 Apr 01 2002 16:18:20 softkeyDefault.xml
> 8   69 Apr 01 2002 16:18:18 syncinfo.xml
> 9 1836 Apr 01 2002 16:18:18 SIPDefault.cnf
> 101236 Mar 01 2002 20:14:38 SIP000D659FDBD8.cnf
> 11  13 Apr 01 2002 16:15:46 OS79XX.TXT
>
> Delete them.
>
> Go to global run create profile, it will create these files again with new
> info.
>
> more flash:SIP000D659FDBD8.cnf
> more flash:SIPDefault.cnf
>
> Above two are also helpful to identify the problem.
>
> Also check #sh ephone
>
> See if the phone is registered as ephone.
>
> If yes ,
>
> no ephone XX
> shut down the phone port
> reload the router.
>
> On 11/18/2010 1:21 PM, Dew Swen wrote:
>
> Hi Shrini,
> yes I wrote the id mac correctly. I entered "create profile" command
> every time I changed the configuration. But I didnt wrote no create
> profile. Does it make sense?
>
> On 11/18/10, Shrini   wrote:
>
> Have you specified id mac under voice register pool of the phone ?
> Under voice register global
>
> no create profile
> create profile
>
> This should work as long as all config is good.
>
>
> On 11/18/2010 7:10 AM, dew.s...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
> Yesterday when I was in the lab I had a problem like that.
>
> In CME sccp phones had SIP firmwire which I corrected by registering them
> to CUCM as SCCP
> (I followed the way which Matthew and Chevy said). There was no problem
> with SCCP phones.
>
> However, one of the SIP phones (7960-directly connected) registered as
> SCCP. I followed the same way, changed option 150 ip address from CME to
> CUCM. I registered it as SIP phone to CUCM so it got the correct firmwire.
> All good. But when I try to re-register it to CME it didnt. What did I
> miss?
> (source address in voice register global was correct, sip and bind all
> source int commands were correct, voice register dn and voice register
> pool commands were ok. Xlite was registered but 7960 directly connected
> phone didnt)
>
> Kind regards,
> --
> Dew Swen / sent from mobile device
> CCVP, CCDP, CCNP
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GK Call getting busy tone

[Wes Ducote]

Is it a SIP or SCCP phone that you are dialing from?  Have you tried to add
a MTP to help w/ supp signaling?

On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Shrini  wrote:

> Hi Roger,
>
> I tried as suggested by you. No luck, still same.
>
> Thanks
> Shrini
>
> On 11/18/2010 2:18 AM, Rogers Ochieng wrote:
>
> On the GK Trunk in CUCM, uncheck Wait for Far End H.245 Terminal Capability
> Set
>
> On 18 November 2010 11:44, Shrini  wrote:
>
>> Hi Experts:
>>
>> When I redial a HQ missed call (+1408XXX) on Br2 Ph1 (International) ,
>> HQ Phone is recieving the call, I am able to pickup but in few seconds I get
>> fast busy tone on Br2 Ph1.
>>
>> Path is as follows:
>>
>> Br1 Ph1 -> Br1 RTR  RAS -> CUCM Xlation to 9XXX -> HQ local GW -> HQ
>> Ph1
>>
>> I also added IOS Xcoder on Gatekeeper trunk. Still same.
>>
>> Please advice ..
>>
>> T I A
>> Shrini
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com