Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 9971 IP phones

[sbartos]

If you are associated with an appropriate partner, research NFR licensing, it can be purchased for about $250(US) through the website.  Includes just about everything except VCS


 Original Message 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 9971 IP phones
From: Mike O'Nan .
Date: Fri, May 30, 2014 12:45 pm
To: "Kaloudis, Bill" , Bill Hatcher
, Andy Vassar 
Cc: ccievoice 

Upgrade everything and take a snapshot of the image. When the demo license expires just restore to the snapshot for another demo period. I have also heard rumors of a license for lab use. Unfortunately I'm not sure how to get one. Original message From: "Kaloudis, Bill"  Date:05/30/2014 11:20 AM (GMT-06:00) To: Bill Hatcher ,Andy Vassar  Cc: ccievoice  Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 9971 IP phones   Any advice on how to handle the licensing of the 9.x uc (cucm, sme, unc, ccx, cup) as well as video (vcs) applications? What would be the most cost effective route to upgrade the home lab?   Bill    From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Bill Hatcher Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 11:25 AM To: Andy Vassar Cc: ccievoice Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 9971 IP phones     I was at Cisco Live this last week, and had the honor to attend the CCIE Collaboration Techtorial with Ben Ng.  During one of the breaks I asked him if 2900/3900 routers were really needed for study, and how many 9971's would I need.  A lot of us have made significant investments in our home labs and the 2800/3800 series routers are still viable platforms.  His response was we would need at least one 2911 with PVDM3's in order to set up a video conference, and three 9971's with the cameras.  I hope this helps everyone who is planning on purchasing or upgrading home labs.       Bill   On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Andy Vassar  wrote:  Great find Mike!  Thanks for sharing! Thanks,       Andy Vassar : Sr. Instructor : iPexpert   CCIE #22042 :: Collaboration / Voice / R&S   :: World-Class Certification Training       Direct:  +1.810.326.1444   :: Free Videos   :: Free Training / Product Offerings   :: CCIE Blog   :: Twitter         On May 30, 2014, at 7:04 AM, Mike O'Nan  wrote:   In preparation for the collaboration lab I have been on the search for 9971 IP phones. After searching high and low I found the best price on eBay. The seller name is sud6930. I have purchased a total of three 9971 from this seller for 179-189 WITH the camera. I am in NO way affiliated with this seller. I just wanted to share the information so people can have the physical endpoints at an affordable price. The phones are needed at your desk to practice video while utilizing the racks from Proctor Labs/iPexpert over L2VPN.   ___ Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::  iPexpert on YouTube:  www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc       ___ Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::  iPexpert on YouTube:  www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc    If you received this message and have reason to believe the sender did not intend to direct it to you, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the message from your system. This message (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or proprietary information that should be read only by certain individuals. As a result, any unauthorized disclosure, copying, or distribution of this e-mail and the information contained herein is strictly prohibited and may constitute a violation of law. If you have any questions about this e-mail please notify the sender immediately. ___
Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc


___
Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hello friends anyone around

[sbartos]

Yes you are in the right place.  I think that since the flurry of activity for those trying get in under old test has passed everyone is taking a break and getting started on the new version.Did you have a question?Steve


 Original Message 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hello friends anyone around
From: shanon hydes 
Date: Wed, March 05, 2014 3:09 pm
To: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 

   Hello Guys cant see anyone talking is this right place i am in   ___
Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc


___
Free CCIE R&S, Collaboration, Data Center, Wireless & Security Videos ::

iPexpert on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ipexpertinc

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco Voice Home Lab

[sbartos]

If you are building a lab at this point,  no matter which version of the test you are going to attempt I would build to the new Collaboration spec.  For example, to tun the specified code for the vgwys, you must have at least 29xx hardware, but to run the correct train for the Voice spec you need 28xx hardware.Seems that since most everyone does a few attempts (including me, getting ready for my 3rd) that ultimately you will end up with the Collaboration at some point unless you pass the first time.All of that being said, 28xx hardware is getting pretty cheap.  I think I am going to add a single 29xx platform to learn the differences and the leave the rest on the 28xx equipment.Steve


 Original Message 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco Voice Home Lab
From: Josh Petro 
Date: Wed, July 31, 2013 2:24 pm
To: LorenzLGRC 
Cc: CCIE Voice Study List 

Agreed. No reason  to rush an attempt at the current version.  Unless you've studied for the current track previously and feel confident, I would highly suggest going for the Collaboration track. Im testing tomorrow for the first time after 9 months of studying and if I were in your shoes, I would wait for the Collaboration lab to be available. Just start studying now. If you have the IPExpert VoDs, that's a great start and helps cement concepts. I also created a notebook, segmented by topic that I've been updating throughout my study time. Good luck Josh On Jul 31, 2013 11:37 AM, "LorenzLGRC"  wrote: I would suggest using mixed hw equipment.such as 29xx with poe card and ps for just one site28xx for the other two sitesCUCM/CUC/IMP/CUCX version 9 On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 8:29 PM,  wrote: Hi All,  Considering to build a home lab for the current version, however just wondering what if I am not able to pass the lab before Valentine’s Day next year, could the same gear be upgraded for the next version of the lab?  Please share your thoughts Regards  Wilson Samuel |  East Region | BT Global Services | wilson.sam...@bt.com |  http://globalservices.bt.com/  This e-mail contains information from BT which may be privileged or confidential. It's meant only for the individual(s) or entity named above. If you're not the intended recipient, note that disclosing, copying, distributing or using this information is prohibited. If you've received this e-mail in error, please let me know immediately on the e-mail address above. Thank you. We monitor our e-mail system, and may record your e-mails.  BT Americas Inc., 150 Newport Avenue Ext., Quincy, MA 02171 USA                   BT Americas Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of British Telecommunications plc.   Think before you print! Consider the environment before printing this email!  ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com  Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com  Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX agent ready state

[sbartos]

That is expected behaviour.  The assumption is that if the agent did not pick up the phone the first time, they are probably not physically present, therefore no further calls are presented until the agent pushes the button when they return to the desk.Steve


 Original Message 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX agent ready state
From: Karen Johnson 
Date: Wed, July 31, 2013 2:06 pm
To: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 
Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 

all,when i call 4000, and it will ring agent 4101. if I did not pick up the call, call will go to "Not Readt" stateHowever it never come back to "Ready state"  I have config CSQ  and  Resource Section in UCCX  to "Automatic Work = Enable"  but still it won't go to Ready state until we manually do it from phone.Is that expected or I need to do something in config ?K   ___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Access list for cue traffic marking

[sbartos]

Maybe I am missing something so please forgive me, and to recap, the question was LAN QoS and CUE (not WAN).The example below (which is pretty much out of the SRND)  will correctly mark the traffic, but only going out the serial port.   It seems to me that you would want to mark the traffic inbound from the CUE module to the router in which it resides  so that no matter how the traffic exits the router it will be handled correctly.  Can you mark the traffic as it leaves the AIM module and is passed to the router? As far as the policy map on the serial port, wouldn't we want to see all traffic correctly prioritized not just the CTI-QBE to answer the question correctly if we were to look at the WAN QoS?I assume for traffic leaving on an LAN port to a switch, the switch would have the appropriate trust statements and since we marked on the packets as they transition from the AIM to the router prioritization and re-marking would not be an issue?Steve


 Original Message 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Access list for cue traffic marking
From: LorenzLGRC 
Date: Sun, July 07, 2013 5:25 am
To: Piyush Jain 
Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" 

Hello,you can use something like this:access-list 101 permit tcp host a.b.c.d any eq 2748
!
class-map match-all cti-qbe
 match access-group 101
!
policy-map cti-qbe
 class cti-qbe
 set dscp af31
 bandwidth 20
!
interface Serial0/1
 service-policy output cti-qbeOn Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Piyush Jain  wrote: Hi Guys, I am trying to understand how we can mark CUE traffic on HQ Switch to implement LAN QOS.  I have come up with the below solution. ip access-list extended name CUE permit tcp host 142.100.64.12 host 142.1.66.253 eq 2748  class-map match-any CUE-CLASS  match access group name CUE policy-map CUE-POLICY class CUE-CLASS   set ip dhcp CS3 int fa 1/0/4 description * CONNECTED TO SUB CUCM ***  service policy input CUE-POLICY In above config, 142.100.64.12 is SUB CUCM, 142.1.66.253 is CUE on SC router. Explanation: Since we are applying service policy in incoming direction on switch port connected to CUCM, so the source port number (of CUCM) can be anything but destination port number (i.e for CUE) should be 2748 (JTAPI port).  Any advice or inputs are most welcome. Cheers !!Piyush Jain ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com  Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Re-Built PUB

[sbartos]

If you rebuild the pub from scratch, it will be unaware that there is a sub in existence (even if you have added the IP address through the GUI which only grants permission).  I think the only time a sub gets added to the database for replication is when you actually build it and it initializes for the first time.  Thus the message there is only a single active node.Rebuild the sub and it should all be good.Steve


 Original Message 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Re-Built PUB
From: Chrysostomos Christofi 
Date: Thu, November 01, 2012 8:39 am
To: "Online Study (ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com)"


  Hi   If you can help with that it will be appreciated I have re-installed pub and then the replication is not working any more Do you have something to propose?   admin:utils dbreplication status      utils dbreplication status       Status cannot be performed when replication is down on the publisher, or on a cluster with a single active node or a cores node; aborting replication status check operation   From the SUB     SERVER ID STATE    STATUS QUEUE  CONNECTION CHANGED --- g_ccm1_ccm7_1_5_31900_3    2 Active   Dropped    861678 Nov  1 14:20:15  (PUB) g_cmprimary_ccm7_1_5_31900_3    5 Active   Local   0      (SUB)___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Internal numbers overlap with one route pattern

[sbartos]

Have not had a chance to try it but, if you change your route pattern to [5-9]XXX[0-9]XX and use the translation to remove the hash, it should eliminate the overlap on the 5th digit.Steve


 Original Message 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Internal numbers overlap with one route
pattern
From: Chrysostomos Christofi 
Date: Thu, September 20, 2012 8:45 am
To: Kevin Spicer 
Cc: "Online Study (ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com)"


Hi Kevin   The delay is exactly the same  Without translation pattern is 5 seconds. With translation pattern is again 5 seconds In the translation  I checked also the urgent priority   From: kevinspice...@gmail.com [mailto:kevinspice...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Spicer Sent: Πέμπτη, 20 Σεπτεμβρίου 2012 3:31 μμ To: Chrysostomos Christofi Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Internal numbers overlap with one route pattern   Try a translation pattern # with a trailing hash discard.  On 20 Sep 2012 13:28, "Chrysostomos Christofi"  wrote:   Hi guys   Is it possible to put # to stop inter-digit timeout for internal numbers?(extensions)   I believe no but what is your opinion   Scenario:   route pattern set up for local 7 digit numbers: [5-9]XX (local numbers) internal 4 digit DNs which start with 9(extensions) when dialling the internal DNs there is a delay because of inter-digit timeout can this be fixed? They don’t want to use access code for PSTN calls   Regards    ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit  www.ipexpert.com  Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out  www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com