HI experts We have one slow speed link and one high speed link. One the slow we configure auto qos voip fr-atm and the fast one just auto qos voip.
Is the reason for the slow speed we have to put fr-atm and the fast one we are not required. Would it be incorrect to put fr-atm on the high speed link as well? Also, in the question it looks like we are asked not to use frf.12 and I thought auto qos voip would configure frf.12 Thanks, Randall ________________________________ From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cristobal Priego Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 10:39 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Clustering Over the WAN Hello all, I'd like to get your opinion on this we're bidding on a potential customer and the deal breaker is this clustering over the wan between California and North Carolina the round trip delay between the 2 sites is 100ms we want to deploy the pub in California and a sub in North Carolina. BW is not an issue I know that for the ICCS we need 40ms one way or 80ms round trip time please let me know your thoughts would you implement a pub-sub scenario over the wan knowing that the round trip time between sites is 100ms ? thank you for your opinion on this Cris Legal Disclaimer: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential. It is intended to be read only by the individual or entity to whom it is addressed or by their designee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are on notice that any distribution of this message, in any form, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete or destroy any copy of this message
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
