[ccp4bb] another quick question...

2007-05-24 Thread James Pauff
Good day all,

In COOT, when I view my coordinate pdb file with my
ccp4 map file (using Auto-open mtz), I have a couple
residues for which only a part of the peptide chain is
visible.  E.g. for a Lys, only the terminal nitrogens
at the end of the R-group chain are visible as bonds. 
The other parts of the residue (and even parts of
adjacent residues) are visible only as stars/stellate
points that may or may not be within my blue electron
density.  If I click on the stars, the atom names that
appear are consistent with the missing peptide chain,
and correspond to the missing amino acid that has
the occassional visible R group.

Just wondering what this means, that I am seeing
stellate points that seem to be acting as place
holders for my residues in a couple locations in my
structure.  The structure was obtained using molrep.

Thank you,
James Pauff


   
Take
 the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, 
photos  more. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC


Re: [ccp4bb] another quick question...

2007-05-24 Thread Roger Rowlett
James,

The stars are atoms in a residue that are no longer within
recognizable bonding distances of other atoms. Somewhere along the way
these residues were mangled to the point that some atoms are no longer
within bonding distance of each other. (In Refmac, for example, this can
happen if the X-ray weighting term is too high for the resolution of the
data,and atoms start wandering off during refinement.)

I'm not terribly familiar with Molrep, but most MR programs do rigid
body searches, and do not normally alter the geometry of the search
model. Is the original search model geometrically correct? Whatever the
cause, you can at least snap residues back into line by doing a
regularize zone in Coot. That should round up all the wayward atoms.

Cheers,

___
Roger S. Rowlett
Professor
Department of Chemistry
Colgate University
13 Oak Drive
Hamilton, NY 13346

tel: (315)-228-7245
ofc: (315)-228-7395
fax: (315)-228-7935
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
James Pauff
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 9:03 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] another quick question...


Good day all,

In COOT, when I view my coordinate pdb file with my
ccp4 map file (using Auto-open mtz), I have a couple
residues for which only a part of the peptide chain is
visible.  E.g. for a Lys, only the terminal nitrogens
at the end of the R-group chain are visible as bonds. 
The other parts of the residue (and even parts of
adjacent residues) are visible only as stars/stellate
points that may or may not be within my blue electron
density.  If I click on the stars, the atom names that
appear are consistent with the missing peptide chain,
and correspond to the missing amino acid that has
the occassional visible R group.

Just wondering what this means, that I am seeing
stellate points that seem to be acting as place
holders for my residues in a couple locations in my
structure.  The structure was obtained using molrep.

Thank you,
James Pauff


   

Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your
pocket: mail, news, photos  more. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC


[ccp4bb] new version of MR pipeline BALBES

2007-05-24 Thread Garib Murshudov

Dear all,

A new version of an automatic molecular pipeline system - BALBES is  
now available.

It can be downloaded from: www.ysbl.york.ac.uk/~fei/balbes

The new options in this system are:
1) Use of user defined external PDB library
2) Use of a single PDB file as an input model for Molecular replacement
3) Use of assembles. You can give a multiple sequence and the program  
will assume that

it is dealing with a complex of proteins
4) Search of domains from different molecules. For example if you  
molecule consists of
two domains and one domain is in the molecule 1 and another is in a  
molecule 2 then the system
will find both and try to assemble your molecule using molecular  
replacement


Instructions how to use these options are in the README file.

Of course difficult cases remain problematic. We are working on  
improvements of the BALBES to deal

with these cases.

Please send all your suggestions and/or comments to one of us.

Fei   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alexei[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Garib [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[ccp4bb] Maps look different from auto-mtz vs EDS vs FFT in Coot or CCP4MG.

2007-05-24 Thread Kendall Nettles
I¹d like help in interpreting some mystery density in a structure.

I¹m writing a paper about soaking the apo-estrogen receptor with different
ligands. The apo structure is already released, as pdb code 2B23. The
question is whether there is a mystery molecule in the pocket of the apo
receptor. If you superimpose 3ERD, you can see where the ligand binds. The
problem is that with some maps the pocket appears completely empty, and with
others, there appears to be something there. Protein looks essentially
identical with the different maps. We have used a few different approaches
to identify the compound with LC-MS, and are pretty sure there is nothing
there. For example, we can bind our protein to beads, soak it with
estradiol, wash extensively,  elute with organic solvent and find a great
peak for estradiol, but nothing for the apo protein. We have also tried
non-denaturing MS. 

If you look at the 2mFo-DFc map from EDS in Coot or CCP4mg, you see mystery
density in the pocket. If I  use the MTZ, you see density in Coot, but not
CCP4MG. I then downloaded the structure factors from the PDB and made an
MTZ. The map in CCP4MG shows some density, but much less that with the map
from EDS. When I used FFT to make a 2mF1-1nF2 map, there is no mystery
density in either CCP4MG or coot.

I was ready to submit the manuscript with a picture of the mystery density,
but now I¹m not sure if that is appropriate. Any suggestions, as far as how
to interpret this mystery density would be greatly appreciated.

Best Regards,
Kendall
-- 
Kendall W. Nettles, PhD
Assistant Professor
Department of Cancer Biology
The Scripps Research Institute
5353 Parkside Dr. 
Jupiter Fl 33458

office 561-799-8851
fax 561-799-8805
cell 561-306-7566




Re: [ccp4bb] Maps look different from auto-mtz vs EDS vs FFT in Coot or CCP4MG.

2007-05-24 Thread Joao Dias

Dear Kendall,
I would suggest you to run a simulated annealing omit map around the  
region you are interested.

The model bias will be reduced and you will get a more clear answer.

Ciao,
Joao

Joao M. Dias
Ollmann Saphire Lab
The Scripps Research Institute
10550 North Torrey Pines Rd. IMM-2
La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
tel (858)784-8925

On May 24, 2007, at 9:57 AM, Kendall Nettles wrote:


I’d like help in interpreting some mystery density in a structure.

I’m writing a paper about soaking the apo-estrogen receptor with  
different ligands. The apo structure is already released, as pdb  
code 2B23. The question is whether there is a mystery molecule in  
the pocket of the apo receptor. If you superimpose 3ERD, you can  
see where the ligand binds. The problem is that with some maps the  
pocket appears completely empty, and with others, there appears to  
be something there. Protein looks essentially identical with the  
different maps. We have used a few different approaches to identify  
the compound with LC-MS, and are pretty sure there is nothing  
there. For example, we can bind our protein to beads, soak it with  
estradiol, wash extensively,  elute with organic solvent and find a  
great peak for estradiol, but nothing for the apo protein. We have  
also tried non-denaturing MS.


If you look at the 2mFo-DFc map from EDS in Coot or CCP4mg, you see  
mystery density in the pocket. If I  use the MTZ, you see density  
in Coot, but not CCP4MG. I then downloaded the structure factors  
from the PDB and made an MTZ. The map in CCP4MG shows some density,  
but much less that with the map from EDS. When I used FFT to make a  
2mF1-1nF2 map, there is no mystery density in either CCP4MG or coot.


I was ready to submit the manuscript with a picture of the mystery  
density, but now I’m not sure if that is appropriate. Any  
suggestions, as far as how to interpret this mystery density would  
be greatly appreciated.


Best Regards,
Kendall
--
Kendall W. Nettles, PhD
Assistant Professor
Department of Cancer Biology
The Scripps Research Institute
5353 Parkside Dr.
Jupiter Fl 33458

office 561-799-8851
fax 561-799-8805
cell 561-306-7566