Re: [ccp4bb] solve structure by molecular replacement

2010-03-07 Thread Jürgen Bosch

Your molecule seems to be titled towards at least one of the axis, so there's 
no problem with your dimensions in P21.

Jürgen

On Mar 7, 2010, at 7:40 PM, Chunmin L wrote:

> Hi Jürgen,
> 
> Many thanks for your message.  Somehow Mosflm in CCP4 did not
> recognize the images.  Will try XDS. or d*TREK.  Still no answers for
> that P21 one-molecule solution.   It does not collide with itself. The
> model is about 60 A wide and 82 A long.  Unit cell dimensions of a=50
> b=51 c=252.  if we have 82 A along the 252A, the 60 A is wider than
> the
> other two dimensions.  I was surprised to see the previous postdoc got
> pretty good density for this molecule.
> 
> Many thanks,
> Chunmin
> 
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Jürgen Bosch  wrote:
>> 
>> On Mar 7, 2010, at 4:35 PM, Chunmin L wrote:
>> 
>>  I can not reprocess the data to
>> check the systematic absence to determine the space group (I do not
>> have the right software to reprocess the raw image at this time).
>> 
>> What exactly do you mean by that ? The world does not consist of HKL alone,
>> there are other options available even CCP4 ones e.g. Mosflm or non-CCP4
>> e.g. XDS. or d*TREK
>> Jürgen
>> -
>> Jürgen Bosch
>> Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
>> Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
>> Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute
>> 615 North Wolfe Street, W8708
>> Baltimore, MD 21205
>> Phone: +1-410-614-4742
>> Lab:  +1-410-614-4894
>> Fax:  +1-410-955-3655
>> http://web.mac.com/bosch_lab/
>> 

-
Jürgen Bosch
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute
615 North Wolfe Street, W8708
Baltimore, MD 21205
Phone: +1-410-614-4742
Lab:  +1-410-614-4894
Fax:  +1-410-955-3655
http://web.mac.com/bosch_lab/



Re: [ccp4bb] anomalous phase extension to native data

2010-03-07 Thread Jürgen Bosch
DM ? Can you use NCS ?

Jürgen
On Mar 7, 2010, at 6:43 PM, Stuart Endo-Streeter wrote:

> Fellow crystallographers,
> 
> I am helping a college with a structure and we've run into a bit of a
> jam.  She has a 2.5 ang sel-met dataset, solved, and a 1.8 ang native
> dataset.  We would like to extend the phase solution from the anomalous
> data to the native data.  Unfortunately I have not been able to figure
> out how to do this using CCP4.  The phase solution was calculated using
> PHENIX, which I have no real experience with yet, having worked with
> SHELX, CNS, and CCP4 in the past.  Can anyone point out the programs, if
> any, in CCP4 (v6.1.3) to extend the phases from the 2.5 anomalous to the
> 1.8 native data?
> 
> Thanks,
> Stuart Endo-Streeter

-
Jürgen Bosch
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute
615 North Wolfe Street, W8708
Baltimore, MD 21205
Phone: +1-410-614-4742
Lab:  +1-410-614-4894
Fax:  +1-410-955-3655
http://web.mac.com/bosch_lab/



Re: [ccp4bb] solve structure by molecular replacement

2010-03-07 Thread Chunmin L
Hi Jürgen,

Many thanks for your message.  Somehow Mosflm in CCP4 did not
recognize the images.  Will try XDS. or d*TREK.  Still no answers for
that P21 one-molecule solution.   It does not collide with itself. The
model is about 60 A wide and 82 A long.  Unit cell dimensions of a=50
b=51 c=252.  if we have 82 A along the 252A, the 60 A is wider than
the
other two dimensions.  I was surprised to see the previous postdoc got
pretty good density for this molecule.

Many thanks,
Chunmin

On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Jürgen Bosch  wrote:
>
> On Mar 7, 2010, at 4:35 PM, Chunmin L wrote:
>
>  I can not reprocess the data to
> check the systematic absence to determine the space group (I do not
> have the right software to reprocess the raw image at this time).
>
> What exactly do you mean by that ? The world does not consist of HKL alone,
> there are other options available even CCP4 ones e.g. Mosflm or non-CCP4
> e.g. XDS. or d*TREK
> Jürgen
> -
> Jürgen Bosch
> Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
> Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
> Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute
> 615 North Wolfe Street, W8708
> Baltimore, MD 21205
> Phone: +1-410-614-4742
> Lab:  +1-410-614-4894
> Fax:  +1-410-955-3655
> http://web.mac.com/bosch_lab/
>


[ccp4bb] anomalous phase extension to native data

2010-03-07 Thread Stuart Endo-Streeter
Fellow crystallographers,

I am helping a college with a structure and we've run into a bit of a
jam.  She has a 2.5 ang sel-met dataset, solved, and a 1.8 ang native
dataset.  We would like to extend the phase solution from the anomalous
data to the native data.  Unfortunately I have not been able to figure
out how to do this using CCP4.  The phase solution was calculated using
PHENIX, which I have no real experience with yet, having worked with
SHELX, CNS, and CCP4 in the past.  Can anyone point out the programs, if
any, in CCP4 (v6.1.3) to extend the phases from the 2.5 anomalous to the
1.8 native data?

Thanks,
Stuart Endo-Streeter


Re: [ccp4bb] solve structure by molecular replacement

2010-03-07 Thread Ethan Merritt
On Sunday 07 March 2010, Jürgen Bosch wrote:
> 
> On Mar 7, 2010, at 4:35 PM, Chunmin L wrote:
> >  I can not reprocess the data to
> > check the systematic absence to determine the space group (I do not
> > have the right software to reprocess the raw image at this time). 
> 
> What exactly do you mean by that ? The world does not consist of HKL alone, 
> there are other options available even CCP4 ones e.g. Mosflm or non-CCP4 e.g. 
> XDS. or d*TREK

And anyhow, you don't need to check the systematic absences.
You need to check whether there are or are not additional 2-fold 
axes. Have the program "pointless" take a look at your P21 data set.

Ethan


Re: [ccp4bb] solve structure by molecular replacement

2010-03-07 Thread Jürgen Bosch

On Mar 7, 2010, at 4:35 PM, Chunmin L wrote:
>  I can not reprocess the data to
> check the systematic absence to determine the space group (I do not
> have the right software to reprocess the raw image at this time). 

What exactly do you mean by that ? The world does not consist of HKL alone, 
there are other options available even CCP4 ones e.g. Mosflm or non-CCP4 e.g. 
XDS. or d*TREK

Jürgen

-
Jürgen Bosch
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute
615 North Wolfe Street, W8708
Baltimore, MD 21205
Phone: +1-410-614-4742
Lab:  +1-410-614-4894
Fax:  +1-410-955-3655
http://web.mac.com/bosch_lab/



Re: [ccp4bb] solve structure by molecular replacement

2010-03-07 Thread Chunmin L
Hi Dr. Merritt,

Thank you very much for your reply.

>> We are trying to solve a protein structure by molecular replacement.
>> The protein crystal has unit cell dimensions of a=50 b=51 c=252,
>> alpha=90 beta=90.4 gamma=90.
>
>> We processed the data both as P21 (two molecules in A. U.)
>
> OK
>
>> and P21212 (one molecule in A. U.).
>
> What about the other possible orthorhombic spacegroups?
> You need to try at least
>   P212121
>   P22121
>   P21221
> You should at the least try that 3rd one, since it is the equivalent
> to your P21 setting.

I am planning to do that.  Did you notice that the model molecule is
fatter than my unit cell but we still be able to obtain good density
for one molecule in the P21 setting?  I can not reprocess the data to
check the systematic absence to determine the space group (I do not
have the right software to reprocess the raw image at this time).  But
P21 and P21212 gave Rmerge around 10% up to 2.5 A resolution.  I
checked with the lab members, about three postdoc fellows  worked on
this project before, I was told the space group was sure P21212.

>> We have built a model based on sequence homology.
>> It is very interesting that we
>> still found one molecule using P21 data, reasonably GOOD density
>> although the model is about 60 A wide and 82 A long (just refine this
>> one molecule using P21 data, the Overall R factor=0.4731, Overall
>> figure of merit=0.4939, the protein molecule seems have no symmetry by
>> itself).
>
> Wait.
> So your P21 solution only contains one molecule of the two that are expected?
> If you can't fit a second molecule in P21, then I don't see how moving to
> a higher-symmetry space group can work.

I am sorry my message may not that clear.  We failed P21212 then tried P21.

>> We can not find any solution using P21212.  The protein
>> seems have three domains based on our model.  We tried to using only
>> one of the domains.  The results were similar.  Any suggestions as to
>> what else is possibly wrong except that we have not found the correct
>> solution?
>
> I suggest not to use a homology model for molecular replacement.
> Better to use the homologous structure[s] directly, without modifying
> their coordinates.  See recent thread.

Thanks for the good suggestions.


Chunmin


Re: [ccp4bb] solve structure by molecular replacement

2010-03-07 Thread Ethan Merritt
On Sunday 07 March 2010, Ethan Merritt wrote:
> On Sunday 07 March 2010, Chunmin L wrote:
> > Dear All,
> > 
> > We are trying to solve a protein structure by molecular replacement.
> > The protein crystal has unit cell dimensions of a=50 b=51 c=252,
> > alpha=90 beta=90.4 gamma=90.  
> 
> > We processed the data both as P21 (two molecules in A. U.) 
> 
> OK
> 
> > and P21212 (one molecule in A. U.).  
> 
> What about the other possible orthorhombic spacegroups?
> You need to try at least
>P212121
>P22121
>P21221
> You should at the least try that 3rd one, since it is the equivalent
> to your P21 setting.

Oops.
I meant to say that the symmetry of the 3rd one is _not_ a superset
of your P21 setting.


Re: [ccp4bb] solve structure by molecular replacement

2010-03-07 Thread Ethan Merritt
On Sunday 07 March 2010, Chunmin L wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
> We are trying to solve a protein structure by molecular replacement.
> The protein crystal has unit cell dimensions of a=50 b=51 c=252,
> alpha=90 beta=90.4 gamma=90.  

> We processed the data both as P21 (two molecules in A. U.) 

OK

> and P21212 (one molecule in A. U.).  

What about the other possible orthorhombic spacegroups?
You need to try at least
   P212121
   P22121
   P21221
You should at the least try that 3rd one, since it is the equivalent
to your P21 setting.


> We have built a model based on sequence homology.  
> It is very interesting that we
> still found one molecule using P21 data, reasonably GOOD density
> although the model is about 60 A wide and 82 A long (just refine this
> one molecule using P21 data, the Overall R factor=0.4731, Overall
> figure of merit=0.4939, the protein molecule seems have no symmetry by
> itself).  

Wait. 
So your P21 solution only contains one molecule of the two that are expected?  
If you can't fit a second molecule in P21, then I don't see how moving to
a higher-symmetry space group can work.

> We can not find any solution using P21212.  The protein
> seems have three domains based on our model.  We tried to using only
> one of the domains.  The results were similar.  Any suggestions as to
> what else is possibly wrong except that we have not found the correct
> solution?

I suggest not to use a homology model for molecular replacement.
Better to use the homologous structure[s] directly, without modifying
their coordinates.  See recent thread.


Re: [ccp4bb] solve structure by molecular replacement

2010-03-07 Thread Chunmin L
Dear All,

We are trying to solve a protein structure by molecular replacement.
The protein crystal has unit cell dimensions of a=50 b=51 c=252,
alpha=90 beta=90.4 gamma=90.  We processed the data both as P21 (two
molecules in A. U.) and P21212 (one molecule in A. U.).  We have built
a model based on sequence homology.  It is very interesting that we
still found one molecule using P21 data, reasonably GOOD density
although the model is about 60 A wide and 82 A long (just refine this
one molecule using P21 data, the Overall R factor=0.4731, Overall
figure of merit=0.4939, the protein molecule seems have no symmetry by
itself).  We can not find any solution using P21212.  The protein
seems have three domains based on our model.  We tried to using only
one of the domains.  The results were similar.  Any suggestions as to
what else is possibly wrong except that we have not found the correct
solution?

Thanks in advance,

Chunmin


[ccp4bb] Postdoctoral Position in Membrane Protein Biology at NINDS/NIH

2010-03-07 Thread Reinhard Grisshammer

*NINDS/NIH Postdoctoral Position in Membrane Protein Biology*

Applications are invited for a postdoctoral position in the Membrane 
Protein Structure and Function Unit, National Institute of Neurological 
Disorders and Stroke, to work on the structure determination and 
functional aspects of G-protein-coupled receptors.


Candidates will ideally have experience with membrane protein 
expression, purification, characterization and/or crystallization, but 
highly qualified candidates from other areas of biochemistry and 
structural biology are also encouraged to apply.


Applicants must have a Ph.D. and fewer than 5 years of postdoctoral 
experience.


Applicants should send their CV, and the names and addresses of three 
referees to:


Reinhard Grisshammer
MPSFU, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National 
Institutes of Health

5625 Fishers Lane, Room 4S12, Rockville MD 20852, USA
E-mail: rkgr...@helix.nih.gov

The NIH is dedicated to building a diverse community in its training and 
employment programs.


--
Reinhard Grisshammer
NINDS, NIH
5625 Fishers Lane, room 4S-12
Rockville, MD 20852
telephone +1 301 594 9223
fax +1 301-480-3934
email rkgr...@helix.nih.gov
http://neuroscience.nih.gov/Lab.asp?Org_ID=541



Re: [ccp4bb] Reg Protein purification

2010-03-07 Thread Tommi Kajander

Dear Sivaraman,

in case no one mentioned it, i would simply try ion exchange. DNA will  
bind very strongly to anion exchange columns (obviously).

(and probably your protein is basic?)
worked for me many times. and note that if you have a smear on agarose  
only tells about the size distr. of your nucleic acid not protein.


with regards to IMAC, to my understanding its not the imidazole but  
leaking metal ions that cause the precipitation, this has been
discussed many times... (while of course you are better of changing  
the buffer, not a good idea to keep it in high imidazole)


HTH,
Tommi


On Mar 6, 2010, at 7:00 PM, Chun Luo wrote:


Hi Sivaraman,

NAD+ has A259 peak absorbance. So you may not have that much nucleic  
acids contamination.


However, it is not uncommon to have large amount of nucleic acids  
eluted from Ni columns. Adding our TurboNuclease (http://www.accelagen.com/TurboNuclease-protocol.htm 
) in lysis buffer can significantly reduce nucleic acids  
contamination and lysate viscosity. TurboNuclease has thousands fold  
higher specific activity than DNaseI. So you only need a little bit.


Many proteins aggregate/precipitate in imidazole. It’s a useful  
precaution to remove imidazole before concentrating proteins. You  
probably concentrated the protein to a minute volume for a 16/60  
column and the concentration could be too high. Try desalting before  
concentrating the protein and try SEC at lower protein concentration.


Good luck!

Chun

From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk] On Behalf  
Of Sivaraman Padavattan

Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2010 4:24 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] Reg Protein purification

Dear All,

We are trying to purify an enzyme, which requires the co-factor NAD+  
during catalysis by affinity column (Ni-NTA). After induction, the  
bacterial cells were harvested and lysed with 20 mM Tris pH 7.2, 500  
mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 5 MM B-ME. The resultant supernatant was  
passed through Ni-NTA and bound protein eluted with increasing  
concentration of Imidazole. The eluted proteins was concentrated and  
load onto gelfiltration (Superdex S-75 16/60) column. Our protein  
eluted as a aggregate along with other protein, where A260 was much  
greater than A280, indicative of large fraction of nucleic acid  
contamination. The eluant also appeared as a smear on 1% agarose gel  
electrophoresis. We introduced 1M NaCl in the lysis buffer to  
prevent the nucleic acid interaction. But most of our protein went  
in pellet after cell lysis. We look forward to your valuable  
suggestion to purify the protein free of nucleic acid contamination.


Thanks in advance,

Sivaraman Padavattan






Tommi Kajander, Ph.D.
Structural Biology and Biophysics
Institute of Biotechnology
University of Helsinki
Viikinkaari 1
(P.O. Box 65)
00014 Helsinki
Finland
p. +358-9-19158903
tommi.kajan...@helsinki.fi


Re: [ccp4bb] Reg Protein purification

2010-03-07 Thread Raji Edayathumangalam

Hi Sivaraman,

One efficient way to remove nonspecifically associated DNA is to do  
polyethyleneimine (PEI) precipitation. Protocols are available online.  
Search for PEI precipitation.


Also look up this reference for RNA polymerase purification:
Burgess and Jendrisak.  1975  Biochemistry 14(21):4624-8

It is a great method when many others fail to efficiently remove DNA.

Hope that helps.
Raji


---
Raji Edayathumangalam
Joint Research Fellow
Harvard Medical School/
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Brandeis University




On Mar 6, 2010, at 7:23 AM, Sivaraman Padavattan wrote:


Dear All,

We are trying to purify an enzyme, which requires the co-factor NAD+  
during catalysis by affinity column (Ni-NTA). After induction, the  
bacterial cells were harvested and lysed with 20 mM Tris pH 7.2, 500  
mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 5 MM B-ME. The resultant supernatant was  
passed through Ni-NTA and bound protein eluted with increasing  
concentration of Imidazole. The eluted proteins was concentrated and  
load onto gelfiltration (Superdex S-75 16/60) column. Our protein  
eluted as a aggregate along with other protein, where A260 was much  
greater than A280, indicative of large fraction of nucleic acid  
contamination. The eluant also appeared as a smear on 1% agarose gel  
electrophoresis. We introduced 1M NaCl in the lysis buffer to  
prevent the nucleic acid interaction. But most of our protein went  
in pellet after cell lysis. We look forward to your valuable  
suggestion to purify the protein free of nucleic acid contamination.


Thanks in advance,

Sivaraman Padavattan







[ccp4bb] Cryoprotective ability of low molecular weight (400kDa) poly-gsmms-glutamic acid (PGA) polymer

2010-03-07 Thread E rajakumar
Dear All
Please can you tell me what is the Cryoprotective ability of low molecular 
weight (400kDa) poly-gamma-glutamic acid (LM-PGA) polymer.
If it is cryoprotective then can anybody mail me the percentage of glycerol/EG 
addition for the given percentage of LM-PGA.
Thanking you
raj


E. Rajakumara
Postdoctoral Fellow  
Strcutural Biology Program  
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center  
New York-10021  NY  001 212 639 7986 (Lab)  001 917 674 6266 (Mobile)



  Get your preferred Email name!
Now you can @ymail.com and @rocketmail.com. 
http://mail.promotions.yahoo.com/newdomains/aa/