[ccp4bb] unsubscribe ccp4bb

[mac minista]

Re: [ccp4bb] electron density maps in Coot vs O / Pymol

[mac minista]

Hi, 

thank you for your suggestions, the difference I am
seeing in the maps is mainly with the Fo-Fc maps i.e.
what appears in coot does not always appear in
O/Pymol. Here are the scripts for FFT and MAPMASK:

FFT

#!/bin/sh

set -e

fft hklin  model.mtz  mapout fofc_f.map 

[ccp4bb] electron density maps in Coot vs O / Pymol

[mac minista]

Dear all,
   
  I have noticed that going from refmac 5 (script) to generate fo-fc and 2fo-fc 
maps in O / Pymol once and Coot in the other, the outcome is not exactly the 
same electron density maps-I mean some differences are seen.  I have used the 
following columns in Coot (latest version): FOFCWT, PHFOFCWT and 2FOFCWT, 
PH2FOFCWT.  The .o map file was generated using FFT, MAPMASK and MAPMAN.
  I want to know why I am not getting identical maps, and if there is a 
solution to avoid this problem then I would really appreciate your help.
   
  With regards
  Mac

 
-
Finding fabulous fares is fun.
Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel 
bargains.