Re: [ccp4bb] Deposition requirement of anomalous pairs?

2019-03-20 Thread Randy Read
I’d be with you, Graeme, as a good compromise between merged data and raw 
diffraction images.  Though it does seem to be getting more practical to make 
image data available…

Randy

-
Randy J. Read
Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge
Cambridge Institute for Medical ResearchTel: +44 1223 336500
Wellcome Trust/MRC Building Fax: +44 1223 336827
Hills RoadE-mail: 
rj...@cam.ac.uk
Cambridge CB2 0XY, U.K.   
www-structmed.cimr.cam.ac.uk

> On 20 Mar 2019, at 12:31, graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk 
>  wrote:
> 
> Hi Eleanor
> 
> I’d raise you scaled but unmerged intensities :-)
> 
> Best wishes Graeme
> 
> 
> On 20 Mar 2019, at 12:21, Eleanor Dodson 
> <176a9d5ebad7-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk>
>  wrote:
> 
> 
> Wouldn't it be a good idea if the pdb required that data deposition provide h 
> k l I+ SIGI+  I- SIGI-  ??
> 
> Even if the depositor has not exploited the anomalous signal, it may well be 
> there sufficiently strongly to validate CYS or phosphates.
> 
> I believe aata processing programs provide this information ?
> 
> Eleanor Dodson
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1
> 
> -- 
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or 
> privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If 
> you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the 
> addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, 
> copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the 
> e-mail.
> Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not 
> necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd. 
> Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any 
> attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any 
> damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be 
> transmitted in or with the message.
> Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and 
> Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and 
> Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1



To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1


Re: [ccp4bb] Deposition requirement of anomalous pairs?

2019-03-20 Thread Robbie Joosten
Hi Eleanor,

That would be a great idea. We would use these data a lot for validation.

Cheers,
Robbie

> -Original Message-
> From: CCP4 bulletin board  On Behalf Of Eleanor
> Dodson
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 13:21
> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: [ccp4bb] Deposition requirement of anomalous pairs?
> 
> 
> Wouldn't it be a good idea if the pdb required that data deposition provide h
> k l I+ SIGI+  I- SIGI-  ??
> 
> Even if the depositor has not exploited the anomalous signal, it may well be
> there sufficiently strongly to validate CYS or phosphates.
> 
> I believe aata processing programs provide this information ?
> 
> Eleanor Dodson
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1




To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1


Re: [ccp4bb] Deposition requirement of anomalous pairs?

2019-03-20 Thread graeme.win...@diamond.ac.uk
Hi Eleanor

I’d raise you scaled but unmerged intensities :-)

Best wishes Graeme


On 20 Mar 2019, at 12:21, Eleanor Dodson 
<176a9d5ebad7-dmarc-requ...@jiscmail.ac.uk>
 wrote:


Wouldn't it be a good idea if the pdb required that data deposition provide h k 
l I+ SIGI+  I- SIGI-  ??

Even if the depositor has not exploited the anomalous signal, it may well be 
there sufficiently strongly to validate CYS or phosphates.

I believe aata processing programs provide this information ?

Eleanor Dodson



To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1

-- 
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or 
privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you 
are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee 
please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, 
retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail.
Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not 
necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd. 
Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments 
are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you 
may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with 
the message.
Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and 
Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and 
Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom




To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1


[ccp4bb] Deposition requirement of anomalous pairs?

2019-03-20 Thread Eleanor Dodson
Wouldn't it be a good idea if the pdb required that data deposition provide
h k l I+ SIGI+  I- SIGI-  ??

Even if the depositor has not exploited the anomalous signal, it may well
be there sufficiently strongly to validate CYS or phosphates.

I believe aata processing programs provide this information ?

Eleanor Dodson



To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1