Re: [ccp4bb] FW: complex multi-crystal averaging

2019-01-10 Thread vincent Chaptal

Dear Andy,

for the I222 crystal, you mention a large difference in diffracting 
resolution, but staraniso doesn't help. Maybe you simply don't have 
anisotropy, but rather lack of completeness in high resolution shells, a 
different problem. How much is the anisotropy value given by Phaser?


I got confused by your description of what you have and don't have. 
Maybe the simplest would be to build as good as you can in your P3212, 
and use this as a MR search for the I222 crystal. Phaser will take care 
of things for you.
Your anisotropy is strong but others have managed with these values so 
keep faith, you can still get something out of it. Start building in 
Calpha, and iterative cycles of manual building and refinement will get 
you to a good place. If you have alpha helices, it is much easier than 
beta sheets, so focus on those. I wouldn't give up on a 3A dataset, even 
with large difference in diffracting resolutions.


Good luck.
Vincent



On 10/01/2019 12:05, Andrew Lovering wrote:


Ok – small oversight – I can see now that phenix has the atoms 
placed/saved during cutout stage – so how best to use PHASER output to 
shift this file?


Andy

*From:*Andrew Lovering (School of Biosciences)
*Sent:* 10 January 2019 10:48
*To:* 'ccp4bb@jiscmail.ac.uk'
*Subject:* RE: complex multi-crystal averaging

Thanks everyone for the pointers. I should clarify – my issue here is 
the multiple stage “disconnect” between PDB in xtal1 -> cutout density 
(into a “interim cell” just for this stage) -> phaser MR with density 
search model into xtal2


Hence, do I just simply pop the model from (1) into the “interim cell” 
(display cutout density, move molecule here in coot, bit of manual 
shifting / rigid body, save interim PDB) then use PDBSET on saved PDB 
with angles and shifts from phaser output?


To use clear language, “what’s the easiest way to get PDB xtal1 to 
match placed density of MR in xtal2” J


Andy

*From:*Andrew Lovering (School of Biosciences)
*Sent:* 09 January 2019 16:08
*To:* 'ccp4bb@jiscmail.ac.uk'
*Subject:* complex multi-crystal averaging

Dear All,

I suspect the way out of this is a new crystal (!) but interested to 
hear any advice.


I have two crystal forms of a 500aa protein, vaguely tube-shaped

1=P3121, diffracts to 4.1 ang, 3 copies in asu, 86% solvent; map 
indicates it is a relative of other folds (but those are not so close 
that they’d be a good guide to sequence register). I have selenomet 
SAD phases which helps identify Met positions. The 3-fold and high 
solvent give a great map but you wouldn’t want to build it and 
buccanner and phenix think similar


2=I222, 2 copies per asu, 66% solvent. This has a cell that gives 
wildly anisotropic diffraction – ~3, 3.5, 4.3 down different axes. Not 
really rectified by staraniso. No phases


So I can cut the density out of form 1 map (using secondary structure 
elements of a rough PDB as a mask), and use phaser with this density 
as search model to find the two copies with a TFZ of about 10. The 
phaser map shows a bit of detail and the solution has placed the 
protomers such that they agree with a self-rotation function. Phenix 
find_ncs on phaser map similarly agrees (as I would expect).


Now...I have an eye on multi-crystal averaging between the two forms. 
BUT the phaser map isn’t good enough to manually place the PDB used in 
cut-out density, and I can’t see a straightforward way of using the 
angle info in phaser sol to perform a co-ordinate transformation (but 
I think ccp4bb users will put me right on this – I’d imagine placing 
the PDB into the cutout density mtz then using PDBset?). I tried 
converting the phaser mtz to a map using FFT then using phased TF in 
Molrep to place the PDB but this didn’t work, complaining about the 
grid used.


One last caveat – I have multiple sets for the I222 that intriguingly 
differ by 12 angstrom down a 240 ang axis: doing multi-crystal 
averaging between  these two forms achieves little when I would expect 
otherwise (all the NCS correlations are good, high initial agreement)


Like I said...fingers crossed for a new crystal form!

Andy




To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1



--

Vincent Chaptal, PhD

MMSB -UMR5086

Drug Resistance and Membrane Proteins Laboratory

7 passage du Vercors

69007 LYON

FRANCE

+33 4 37 65 29 01

http://mmsb.cnrs.fr/en/





To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1


[ccp4bb] FW: complex multi-crystal averaging

2019-01-10 Thread Andrew Lovering
Ok - small oversight - I can see now that phenix has the atoms placed/saved 
during cutout stage - so how best to use PHASER output to shift this file?

Andy

From: Andrew Lovering (School of Biosciences)
Sent: 10 January 2019 10:48
To: 'ccp4bb@jiscmail.ac.uk'
Subject: RE: complex multi-crystal averaging

Thanks everyone for the pointers. I should clarify - my issue here is the 
multiple stage "disconnect" between PDB in xtal1 -> cutout density (into a 
"interim cell" just for this stage) -> phaser MR with density search model into 
xtal2

Hence, do I just simply pop the model from (1) into the "interim cell" (display 
cutout density, move molecule here in coot, bit of manual shifting / rigid 
body, save interim PDB) then use PDBSET on saved PDB with angles and shifts 
from phaser output?

To use clear language, "what's the easiest way to get PDB xtal1 to match placed 
density of MR in xtal2" :)

Andy

From: Andrew Lovering (School of Biosciences)
Sent: 09 January 2019 16:08
To: 'ccp4bb@jiscmail.ac.uk'
Subject: complex multi-crystal averaging

Dear All,

I suspect the way out of this is a new crystal (!) but interested to hear any 
advice.

I have two crystal forms of a 500aa protein, vaguely tube-shaped

1=P3121, diffracts to 4.1 ang, 3 copies in asu, 86% solvent; map indicates it 
is a relative of other folds (but those are not so close that they'd be a good 
guide to sequence register). I have selenomet SAD phases which helps identify 
Met positions. The 3-fold and high solvent give a great map but you wouldn't 
want to build it and buccanner and phenix think similar

2=I222, 2 copies per asu, 66% solvent. This has a cell that gives wildly 
anisotropic diffraction - ~3, 3.5, 4.3 down different axes. Not really 
rectified by staraniso. No phases

So I can cut the density out of form 1 map (using secondary structure elements 
of a rough PDB as a mask), and use phaser with this density as search model to 
find the two copies with a TFZ of about 10. The phaser map shows a bit of 
detail and the solution has placed the protomers such that they agree with a 
self-rotation function. Phenix find_ncs on phaser map similarly agrees (as I 
would expect).

Now...I have an eye on multi-crystal averaging between the two forms. BUT the 
phaser map isn't good enough to manually place the PDB used in cut-out density, 
and I can't see a straightforward way of using the angle info in phaser sol to 
perform a co-ordinate transformation (but I think ccp4bb users will put me 
right on this - I'd imagine placing the PDB into the cutout density mtz then 
using PDBset?). I tried converting the phaser mtz to a map using FFT then using 
phased TF in Molrep to place the PDB but this didn't work, complaining about 
the grid used.

One last caveat - I have multiple sets for the I222 that intriguingly differ by 
12 angstrom down a 240 ang axis: doing multi-crystal averaging between  these 
two forms achieves little when I would expect otherwise (all the NCS 
correlations are good, high initial agreement)

Like I said...fingers crossed for a new crystal form!

Andy







To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1