Re: [ccp4bb] How to number atoms in a ligand

2007-10-08 Thread Dale Tronrud

Dear Joe,

   Atom labels are, in principle, arbitrary.  The molecule doesn't case
what we call its atoms.  To make the PDB more useful, it is handy if
all the people working with a particular compound use the same names for
their atoms.  If you find that someone has already deposited a structure
containing your compound you are expected to use the same names they did.
There are lists of compounds and naming conventions on the PDB web site.

   The small molecule literature doesn't count as precedence for naming
conventions, only what is in the PDB.  No one will hold you to the names
used in the small molecule structure paper.

   If you are the first to work with this compound in the macromolecular
world you are free to choose whatever names you want.  Please choose
something sensible as the rest of use will be stuck with your choice
forever.  Consistency is king here.  If a similar compound is in the
PDB, using atom names based on it would simplify comparisons.

Dale Tronrud


Zheng Zhou wrote:

Hi, all

I am a rookie in crystallography. I know this may be a little bit off 
topic. I have cocrystallized several compounds with my favorite protein. 
I found crystal structures for some of these chemicals. But the 
numbering systems are different in those original papers for the small 
molecules. Some numbering system has all the atoms from 1 to the end 
(C1-O3-O8-N9-C15), while others have numbers for each individual 
element. (C1-C12, O1-O2, N1). I was trying to search a unified theme for 
ligands in pdb. I even emailed [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED], but so far I haven't heard anything 
back. Could anyone give me some suggestions? Any help would be greatly 
appreciated.
 
Thanks,


Sorry to bother others

Joe



Re: [ccp4bb] How to number atoms in a ligand

2007-10-08 Thread Artem Evdokimov
If you want to be 'by the book' on it, you should follow IUPAC rules for
atomic numbering of chemical compounds. Unless you're an organic chemist,
these rules are pretty hard to follow, so most people number at will.

 

If you're dealing with a 'known' series of compounds, such as analogous
inhibitors developed in the course of a research project (say, in pharma
industry) then typically you will see people refer to specific locations by
number, and try to keep numbering consistent.

 

Artem

 

  _  

From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zheng
Zhou
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 9:01 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] How to number atoms in a ligand

 

Hi, all


I am a rookie in crystallography. I know this may be a little bit off topic.
I have cocrystallized several compounds with my favorite protein. I found
crystal structures for some of these chemicals. But the numbering systems
are different in those original papers for the small molecules. Some
numbering system has all the atoms from 1 to the end (C1-O3-O8-N9-C15),
while others have numbers for each individual element. (C1-C12, O1-O2, N1).
I was trying to search a unified theme for ligands in pdb. I even emailed
[EMAIL PROTECTED], but so far I haven't heard anything back. Could
anyone give me some suggestions? Any help would be greatly appreciated. 

 

Thanks,

Sorry to bother others 

Joe