Re: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] RMSD between structures of homologous proteins

2014-08-13 Thread George Devaniranjan
Thanks to the mailing list I came across this:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24167157

The C code to compute is available on the link mentioned in the paper.

Best wishes,
George


On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Eugene Krissinel <
eugene.krissi...@stfc.ac.uk> wrote:

> It is probably Gesamt/SSM (Superpose in CCP4), or PDBeFold at EBI rather
> than PISA -- Eugene
>
> On 13 Aug 2014, at 12:33, Eleanor Dodson wrote:
>
> I think PISA does this for you - it overlaps structural features and gives
> an RMSD on those parts that fit and a useful list of matching residues.
> You can run it from CCP4I or at PDBe.
>
> If you ant more than CA RMSD then you will need to select out the spans to
> fit and use the LSQKAB overlap procedure
> FIT MAIN RESi n n+m CHAIN A
> MATCH RESI b b+m CHAIN C
>
> FIT ….
>
> etc
>
> for example - you can do that in the GUI
>
> Eleanor
>
>
> On 13 August 2014 02:48,  herman.schreu...@sanofi.com>> wrote:
> Dear Sreetama,
>
> I use an ancient superposition program which rejects all atom pairs
> deviating more than 3 sigma and repeats this procedure until convergence.
> It then reports the RMSD for all atoms and for the atoms deviating less
> than 3 sigma. I find this an excellent method to separate the core from
> variable loop regions. It also ensures a robust superposition of the cores,
> ignoring variable loops.
>
> Best,
> Herman
>
> Von: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>] Im Auftrag von sreetama das
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. August 2014 08:12
> An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
> Betreff: [ccp4bb] RMSD between structures of homologous proteins
>
> Dear all,
>When calculating the RMSD between structures of homologous
> proteins, where there are large changes in the loop region(s), which RMSD
> should be reported - an overall value which may be inflated due to the
> deviations in the loops, or separate values for the core and loop regions?
> What is the best way to calculate the RMSD for superposition of the cores
> - should I prepare a separate PDB file by removing the coordinates of the
> loop residues and then superpose?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Sreetama das,
> PhD student,
> Physics, IISc
>
>
>
> --
> Scanned by iCritical.
>
>


Re: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] RMSD between structures of homologous proteins

2014-08-13 Thread Eugene Krissinel
It is probably Gesamt/SSM (Superpose in CCP4), or PDBeFold at EBI rather than 
PISA -- Eugene

On 13 Aug 2014, at 12:33, Eleanor Dodson wrote:

I think PISA does this for you - it overlaps structural features and gives an 
RMSD on those parts that fit and a useful list of matching residues.
You can run it from CCP4I or at PDBe.

If you ant more than CA RMSD then you will need to select out the spans to fit 
and use the LSQKAB overlap procedure
FIT MAIN RESi n n+m CHAIN A
MATCH RESI b b+m CHAIN C

FIT ….

etc

for example - you can do that in the GUI

Eleanor


On 13 August 2014 02:48, 
mailto:herman.schreu...@sanofi.com>> wrote:
Dear Sreetama,

I use an ancient superposition program which rejects all atom pairs deviating 
more than 3 sigma and repeats this procedure until convergence. It then reports 
the RMSD for all atoms and for the atoms deviating less than 3 sigma. I find 
this an excellent method to separate the core from variable loop regions. It 
also ensures a robust superposition of the cores, ignoring variable loops.

Best,
Herman

Von: CCP4 bulletin board 
[mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>] Im Auftrag von 
sreetama das
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. August 2014 08:12
An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>
Betreff: [ccp4bb] RMSD between structures of homologous proteins

Dear all,
   When calculating the RMSD between structures of homologous proteins, 
where there are large changes in the loop region(s), which RMSD should be 
reported - an overall value which may be inflated due to the deviations in the 
loops, or separate values for the core and loop regions?
What is the best way to calculate the RMSD for superposition of the cores - 
should I prepare a separate PDB file by removing the coordinates of the loop 
residues and then superpose?

Thanks in advance,
Sreetama das,
PhD student,
Physics, IISc



-- 
Scanned by iCritical.



Re: [ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] RMSD between structures of homologous proteins

2014-08-13 Thread Eleanor Dodson
I think PISA does this for you - it overlaps structural features and gives
an RMSD on those parts that fit and a useful list of matching residues.
You can run it from CCP4I or at PDBe.

If you ant more than CA RMSD then you will need to select out the spans to
fit and use the LSQKAB overlap procedure
FIT MAIN RESi n n+m CHAIN A
MATCH RESI b b+m CHAIN C

FIT ….

etc

for example - you can do that in the GUI

Eleanor


On 13 August 2014 02:48,  wrote:

>  Dear Sreetama,
>
>
>
> I use an ancient superposition program which rejects all atom pairs
> deviating more than 3 sigma and repeats this procedure until convergence.
> It then reports the RMSD for all atoms and for the atoms deviating less
> than 3 sigma. I find this an excellent method to separate the core from
> variable loop regions. It also ensures a robust superposition of the cores,
> ignoring variable loops.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Herman
>
>
>
> *Von:* CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] *Im Auftrag von
> *sreetama das
> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 13. August 2014 08:12
> *An:* CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> *Betreff:* [ccp4bb] RMSD between structures of homologous proteins
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
>When calculating the RMSD between structures of homologous
> proteins, where there are large changes in the loop region(s), which RMSD
> should be reported - an overall value which may be inflated due to the
> deviations in the loops, or separate values for the core and loop regions?
>
> What is the best way to calculate the RMSD for superposition of the cores
> - should I prepare a separate PDB file by removing the coordinates of the
> loop residues and then superpose?
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Sreetama das,
>
> PhD student,
>
> Physics, IISc
>


[ccp4bb] AW: [ccp4bb] RMSD between structures of homologous proteins

2014-08-12 Thread Herman . Schreuder
Dear Sreetama,

I use an ancient superposition program which rejects all atom pairs deviating 
more than 3 sigma and repeats this procedure until convergence. It then reports 
the RMSD for all atoms and for the atoms deviating less than 3 sigma. I find 
this an excellent method to separate the core from variable loop regions. It 
also ensures a robust superposition of the cores, ignoring variable loops.

Best,
Herman

Von: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] Im Auftrag von sreetama 
das
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. August 2014 08:12
An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Betreff: [ccp4bb] RMSD between structures of homologous proteins

Dear all,
   When calculating the RMSD between structures of homologous proteins, 
where there are large changes in the loop region(s), which RMSD should be 
reported - an overall value which may be inflated due to the deviations in the 
loops, or separate values for the core and loop regions?
What is the best way to calculate the RMSD for superposition of the cores - 
should I prepare a separate PDB file by removing the coordinates of the loop 
residues and then superpose?

Thanks in advance,
Sreetama das,
PhD student,
Physics, IISc


Re: [ccp4bb] RMSD between structures of homologous proteins

2014-08-12 Thread Prof. K. Sekar
Sreetama,

See the following URL whether it is
useful to solve your issue

http://cluster.physics.iisc.ernet.in/3dss/

best,

Sekar


> Dear all,
>    When calculating the RMSD between structures of homologous
> proteins, where there are large changes in the loop region(s), which RMSD
> should be reported - an overall value which may be inflated due to the
> deviations in the loops, or separate values for the core and loop regions?
> What is the best way to calculate the RMSD for superposition of the cores
> - should I prepare a separate PDB file by removing the coordinates of the
> loop residues and then superpose?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Sreetama das,
> PhD student,
> Physics, IISc
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>


Could you kindly confirm the safe
receipt of the mail please.

All best wishes and regards,

Yours sincerely,

Dr. K. Sekar, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Supercomputer Education and Research Centre
Room No. 341, old Ecological Sciences Building (Second Floor)
Indian Institute of Science
Bangalore 560 012
INDIA

E-mail:se...@physics.iisc.ernet.in
   se...@serc.iisc.ernet.in

Tel:   91-(0)80-22933059/22933060/23600551
Fax:   91-(0)80-23600085

Home page:  http://www.physics.iisc.ernet.in/~dichome/sekhome/index.html
Google Scholar: http://scholar.google.co.in/citations?hl=en&user=CT0Z5kIJ


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


[ccp4bb] RMSD between structures of homologous proteins

2014-08-12 Thread sreetama das
Dear all,
   When calculating the RMSD between structures of homologous proteins, 
where there are large changes in the loop region(s), which RMSD should be 
reported - an overall value which may be inflated due to the deviations in the 
loops, or separate values for the core and loop regions?
What is the best way to calculate the RMSD for superposition of the cores - 
should I prepare a separate PDB file by removing the coordinates of the loop 
residues and then superpose?

Thanks in advance,
Sreetama das,
PhD student,
Physics, IISc