Re: [ccp4bb] Regarding symmetry notion in coot

2018-06-21 Thread Edward A. Berry

On 06/21/2018 03:34 PM, John Berrisford wrote:

 From a PDB deposition point of view, I echo Paul’s comment. If possible, 
please move your molecule closer to the origin. It helps with the curation 
process and is easier for users of your entry as some software struggles with 
such extreme transformations.

Regards

John


Now that we've all read the manual :),
Since the origin shift in question here is always integral: { 1 0 1 }
It seems this is not about _where_ in the unit cell, but in _which_ unit cell.

As I understand it the symop: -X, Y+1/2, Z + (0 -1 1)
is what would work if you were in the first cell { 0 0 0 }
So you need to
Take the current coordinate X =x,y,z
subtract the origin translation O = { 1 0 1 },
apply the symop S = -X, Y+1/2, Z + (0 -1 1) = -X,Y,Z +(0,-1/2,1)
add back the origin translation O

something like X' = S(X-O) + O

which could take three runs of pdbset.

But you could really work out an operator that would do it in one run:
the symop S consists of a rotation and translation

S(x) = M(x) + T
S(X-O) = M(X-O) +T
S(X-O) = M(X) - M(O) +T
X' = S(X-O) + O = M(X) - M(O) + T + O

In the example given, M = -X,Y,Z; T = (0,-1/2,1); O = (1 0 1)
M(O) = -1,0,1
-M(O) = 1,0,-1
add T gives 1,-1/2,0
add O gives 2,-1/2,1
so the operator should be
-X+2,Y-1/2,Z+1
or something like that, which you could use in pdbset.
Matrix inverts along x, coordinates are way positive in x, result way negative,
  need to add 2 unit cell translations to position it adjacent to orig 
coordinates

Would something like that work?


*From:*CCP4 bulletin board  *On Behalf Of *Paul Emsley
*Sent:* 21 June 2018 17:30
*To:* CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
*Subject:* Re: [ccp4bb] Regarding symmetry notion in coot

On 20/06/18 20:49, Anurag Misra wrote:

What is the meaning of the last field — the one in curly brackets -- that

describes the symmetry transformation of a given molecule in coot?


See Section 4.11 of Coot User Manual: "Symmetry"


For example, for

a given X Y Z, coot displays the symmetry transformation of an equivalent

position as " -X, Y+1/2, Z + (0 -1 1) & { 1 0 1 }”.

Can the symmetry molecule be written like bellow by summing respective 
values?


In the general case, no. Move your molecule closer to the origin - so that the 
pre-translation is (0,0,0) - then coot will report "conventional" symmetry.

Regards,

Paul.

--

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1


--

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1





To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1


Re: [ccp4bb] Regarding symmetry notion in coot

2018-06-21 Thread Eleanor Dodson
And so does MOLREP..
Phaser too please?

E

And Paul - yes; please cut and paste..
E

On 21 June 2018 at 20:00, George Sheldrick 
wrote:

> For small molecules, programs such as SHELXT move the structure to be as
> near as possible to the center of the unit-cell, not the origin. Failure to
> do so may cause a 'checkCIF alert'.
>
> George
>
>
> On 06/21/2018 09:34 PM, John Berrisford wrote:
>
> From a PDB deposition point of view, I echo Paul’s comment. If possible,
> please move your molecule closer to the origin. It helps with the curation
> process and is easier for users of your entry as some software struggles
> with such extreme transformations.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> John
>
>
>
> --
> Prof. George M. Sheldrick FRS
> Dept. Structural Chemistry,
> University of Goettingen,
> Tammannstr. 4,
> D37077 Goettingen, Germany
> Tel: +49-551-39-33021 or +49-5594-227312
>
>
>
> --
>
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1
>



To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1


Re: [ccp4bb] Regarding symmetry notion in coot

2018-06-21 Thread George Sheldrick
For small molecules, programs such as SHELXT move the structure to be as 
near as possible to the center of the unit-cell, not the origin. Failure 
to do so may cause a 'checkCIF alert'.


George


On 06/21/2018 09:34 PM, John Berrisford wrote:


From a PDB deposition point of view, I echo Paul’s comment. If 
possible, please move your molecule closer to the origin. It helps 
with the curation process and is easier for users of your entry as 
some software struggles with such extreme transformations.


Regards

John


--
Prof. George M. Sheldrick FRS
Dept. Structural Chemistry,
University of Goettingen,
Tammannstr. 4,
D37077 Goettingen, Germany
Tel: +49-551-39-33021 or +49-5594-227312





To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1


Re: [ccp4bb] Regarding symmetry notion in coot

2018-06-21 Thread John Berrisford
>From a PDB deposition point of view, I echo Paul’s comment. If possible, 
>please move your molecule closer to the origin. It helps with the curation 
>process and is easier for users of your entry as some software struggles with 
>such extreme transformations. 

 

Regards

 

John 

 

From: CCP4 bulletin board  On Behalf Of Paul Emsley
Sent: 21 June 2018 17:30
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Regarding symmetry notion in coot

 

 

On 20/06/18 20:49, Anurag Misra wrote:

 
What is the meaning of the last field — the one in curly brackets -- that 
describes the symmetry transformation of a given molecule in coot?


See Section 4.11 of Coot User Manual: "Symmetry"




 For example, for 
a given X Y Z, coot displays the symmetry transformation of an equivalent 
position as " -X, Y+1/2, Z + (0 -1 1) & { 1 0 1 }”.
 
Can the symmetry molecule be written like bellow by summing respective values?
 

 


In the general case, no. Move your molecule closer to the origin - so that the 
pre-translation is (0,0,0) - then coot will report "conventional" symmetry.

Regards,

Paul.

 

  _  

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB 
<https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1> =1 




To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1


Re: [ccp4bb] Regarding symmetry notion in coot

2018-06-21 Thread Paul Emsley
On 21/06/18 18:36, Eleanor Dodson wrote:
> Paul - where and what is the definition of this line??
>
>

Dear Eleanor,

It is not clear to me how I should answer other than cutting and pasting
Section 4.11 "Symmetry" of the manual. Is that what you want me to do?

Regards,

Paul.



To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1


Re: [ccp4bb] Regarding symmetry notion in coot

2018-06-21 Thread Eleanor Dodson
Paul - where and what is the definition of this line??

eleanor

On 21 June 2018 at 17:29, Paul Emsley  wrote:

>
> On 20/06/18 20:49, Anurag Misra wrote:
>
> What is the meaning of the last field — the one in curly brackets -- that
> describes the symmetry transformation of a given molecule in coot?
>
>
> See Section 4.11 of Coot User Manual: "Symmetry"
>
>  For example, for
> a given X Y Z, coot displays the symmetry transformation of an equivalent
> position as " -X, Y+1/2, Z + (0 -1 1) & { 1 0 1 }”.
>
> Can the symmetry molecule be written like bellow by summing respective values?
>
>
>
>
> In the general case, no. Move your molecule closer to the origin - so that
> the pre-translation is (0,0,0) - then coot will report "conventional"
> symmetry.
>
> Regards,
>
> Paul.
>
>
> --
>
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1
>



To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1


Re: [ccp4bb] Regarding symmetry notion in coot

2018-06-21 Thread Paul Emsley

On 20/06/18 20:49, Anurag Misra wrote:
> What is the meaning of the last field — the one in curly brackets -- that 
> describes the symmetry transformation of a given molecule in coot?

See Section 4.11 of Coot User Manual: "Symmetry"

>  For example, for 
> a given X Y Z, coot displays the symmetry transformation of an equivalent 
> position as " -X, Y+1/2, Z + (0 -1 1) & { 1 0 1 }”.
>
> Can the symmetry molecule be written like bellow by summing respective values?
>
>

In the general case, no. Move your molecule closer to the origin - so
that the pre-translation is (0,0,0) - then coot will report
"conventional" symmetry.

Regards,

Paul.




To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1


[ccp4bb] Regarding symmetry notion in coot

2018-06-20 Thread Anurag Misra
Dear all,

What is the meaning of the last field — the one in curly brackets -- that
describes the symmetry transformation of a given molecule in coot? For
example, for
a given X Y Z, coot displays the symmetry transformation of an equivalent
position as " -X, Y+1/2, Z + (0 -1 1) & { 1 0 1 }”.

Can the symmetry molecule be written like bellow by summing respective values?

-X+0+1, Y+1/2+(-1)+0, Z+1+1


Thanks.

Best regards,

Anurag



To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB=1