[ccp4bb] Stabilization of crystals and ligand exchange

2012-10-17 Thread Sabine Schneider

Hi everyone,

I am trying to get the structure of a protein-ligand complex were I need 
to exchange the ligand which it co-crystallises nicely with.
Problem: either they crack, disolve, turn brown,...  OR they still look 
very nice, well shaped but do not show a single reflection at the 
synchrotron!!!



Here is what I tried so far:

1) initially stabilising with higher precipitant (here PEG1500) before 
slowly transferring (*) it to the ligand-removal solution (= artifical 
mother liquor with higher PEG, ethylen glycol or glucose, but without 
initial ligand)


(*) by slow exchange I mean : initially mixing drop solution with 
stabilising/ligand-removal solution and adding it back to the drop 
stepwise before fully transferring it. Or calculation wise I have fully 
exchange the solution to the new solution


2) here I let them ist over night (if they did not disolve, crack or 
whatever)
3) slow exchange transfer to the artificial ML with the new ligand 
(10mM), left them over night and directly froze them


'Best' so far (crystals still looking nice but no reflection...) was 
slow exchange into higher PEG, than to higher PEG with ethylenglycol 
(30% and also adding ethylenglycol to the reservoir), let them sit for 
over night, before again slow exchange to the solution with the new 
ligand in higher PEG and 30% ethylen glycol.


As I said here the crystals keep shape, but don't diffract at all 
anymore. Just freezing them with 30% ethylen glycol they diffract nicely 
to 2.5A on a home source. But already after step one they are sometimes 
not happy anymore.


Co-crystallisation failed since when I add the ligand, which is not that 
soluble to the purified protein, everything crashed out of solution. I 
am thinking about to test adding the ligand to the diluted protein and 
concentrate it together. But I don't have that much ligand, since the 
synthesis is quite tedious The ligand can be dissolved in 30% 
ethylenglycol to ~50mM


Thus I was wondering if someone has done successfully ligand exchange 
with glutaraldehyd stabilised xtals?

Or any ideas how to stabilise them? I appreciate any ideas or comments!

Sorry for the lengthy email!

Best,
Sabine


Re: [ccp4bb] Stabilization of crystals and ligand exchange

2012-10-18 Thread Herman . Schreuder
Hi Sabine,

The easy experiment to start with, is to take your best conditions (nice 
looking crystals, no diffraction) and instead of overnight wait 4-8 weeks. 
Sometimes ligand exchange is slow, or the ligand induces a conformational 
change which takes a long time to complete in the crystals. There are cases 
that after a number of weeks, diffraction came back.

However, even if the above experiment works, there will be the nagging 
uncertainty that the crystal packing may have prevented some completely 
unexpected, nature or science publication worthy conformational change. There 
will be no way around at least trying to cocrystallize your ligand. Your chance 
of success will depend on how your protein and ligand behave:

-your ligand causes your protein to precipitate. Here your chances are slim. 
You could try to use the ligand as a precipitant by slowly diffusing it in 
(e.g. in a capillary with some gel to separate the protein and ligand 
solutions).
-your ligand is poorly soluble. Here you have better chances. As you mentioned, 
one can add the dilute ligand to a dilute protein solution and then concentrate 
the complex. The amount of ligand needed depends on the affinity of the ligand 
for the protein. To get 90% occupancy, you need a free ligand concentration at 
least 10 times over the Kd (or ~IC50). 

To give an example: if you use for crystallization 10 mg/ml of a 30 kDa 
protein, your protein concentration is ~0.33 mM. If your ligand has an affinity 
of 100 nM, you need a free ligand concentration of 1 µM, which is 300 fold less 
than what you need to saturate all binding sites in the protein. To account for 
uncertainties in protein concentrations, I would add 0.5 - 1.0 mM Ligand. If 
you dilute 10 fold, you have 33 µM protein and I would add 50-100 µM ligand, 
which is still well above the 1 µM free concentration needed. Even with 100 
fold dilution, you still just can dilute the ligand with the same factor as the 
protein and still be well above the required free concentration and you do not 
need more ligand.

Of course, this only works for high-affinity ligands, for low affinity ligands 
it is quite a different story. I also would try to use the highest possible 
ligand concentration, since in many cases, although the ligand should bind in 
theory, in practise it is quite a different story.

Good luck!
Herman




-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Sabine 
Schneider
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 6:27 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] Stabilization of crystals and ligand exchange

Hi everyone,

I am trying to get the structure of a protein-ligand complex were I need to 
exchange the ligand which it co-crystallises nicely with.
Problem: either they crack, disolve, turn brown,...  OR they still look very 
nice, well shaped but do not show a single reflection at the synchrotron!!!


Here is what I tried so far:

1) initially stabilising with higher precipitant (here PEG1500) before slowly 
transferring (*) it to the ligand-removal solution (= artifical mother liquor 
with higher PEG, ethylen glycol or glucose, but without initial ligand)

(*) by slow exchange I mean : initially mixing drop solution with 
stabilising/ligand-removal solution and adding it back to the drop stepwise 
before fully transferring it. Or calculation wise I have fully exchange the 
solution to the new solution

2) here I let them ist over night (if they did not disolve, crack or
whatever)
3) slow exchange transfer to the artificial ML with the new ligand (10mM), left 
them over night and directly froze them

'Best' so far (crystals still looking nice but no reflection...) was slow 
exchange into higher PEG, than to higher PEG with ethylenglycol (30% and also 
adding ethylenglycol to the reservoir), let them sit for over night, before 
again slow exchange to the solution with the new ligand in higher PEG and 30% 
ethylen glycol.

As I said here the crystals keep shape, but don't diffract at all anymore. Just 
freezing them with 30% ethylen glycol they diffract nicely to 2.5A on a home 
source. But already after step one they are sometimes not happy anymore.

Co-crystallisation failed since when I add the ligand, which is not that 
soluble to the purified protein, everything crashed out of solution. I am 
thinking about to test adding the ligand to the diluted protein and concentrate 
it together. But I don't have that much ligand, since the synthesis is quite 
tedious The ligand can be dissolved in 30% ethylenglycol to ~50mM

Thus I was wondering if someone has done successfully ligand exchange with 
glutaraldehyd stabilised xtals?
Or any ideas how to stabilise them? I appreciate any ideas or comments!

Sorry for the lengthy email!

Best,
Sabine


Re: [ccp4bb] Stabilization of crystals and ligand exchange

2012-10-18 Thread Boaz Shaanan
Hi Sabine,

On top of the excellent suggestions of Herman, I was just wondering.   Do you 
have a structure of the ligand-bound protein? If you do and the ligand bound at 
crystal contact with another molecule, I would think that it would be hard to 
get it out without harming the crystals (although not impossible). This may 
help you decide which way to go for obtaining the ligand-free structure.

 Cheers,

Boaz

Boaz Shaanan, Ph.D.
Dept. of Life Sciences
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Beer-Sheva 84105
Israel

E-mail: bshaa...@bgu.ac.il
Phone: 972-8-647-2220  Skype: boaz.shaanan
Fax:   972-8-647-2992 or 972-8-646-1710






From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of 
herman.schreu...@sanofi.com [herman.schreu...@sanofi.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 10:32 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Stabilization of crystals and ligand exchange

Hi Sabine,

The easy experiment to start with, is to take your best conditions (nice 
looking crystals, no diffraction) and instead of overnight wait 4-8 weeks. 
Sometimes ligand exchange is slow, or the ligand induces a conformational 
change which takes a long time to complete in the crystals. There are cases 
that after a number of weeks, diffraction came back.

However, even if the above experiment works, there will be the nagging 
uncertainty that the crystal packing may have prevented some completely 
unexpected, nature or science publication worthy conformational change. There 
will be no way around at least trying to cocrystallize your ligand. Your chance 
of success will depend on how your protein and ligand behave:

-your ligand causes your protein to precipitate. Here your chances are slim. 
You could try to use the ligand as a precipitant by slowly diffusing it in 
(e.g. in a capillary with some gel to separate the protein and ligand 
solutions).
-your ligand is poorly soluble. Here you have better chances. As you mentioned, 
one can add the dilute ligand to a dilute protein solution and then concentrate 
the complex. The amount of ligand needed depends on the affinity of the ligand 
for the protein. To get 90% occupancy, you need a free ligand concentration at 
least 10 times over the Kd (or ~IC50).

To give an example: if you use for crystallization 10 mg/ml of a 30 kDa 
protein, your protein concentration is ~0.33 mM. If your ligand has an affinity 
of 100 nM, you need a free ligand concentration of 1 µM, which is 300 fold less 
than what you need to saturate all binding sites in the protein. To account for 
uncertainties in protein concentrations, I would add 0.5 - 1.0 mM Ligand. If 
you dilute 10 fold, you have 33 µM protein and I would add 50-100 µM ligand, 
which is still well above the 1 µM free concentration needed. Even with 100 
fold dilution, you still just can dilute the ligand with the same factor as the 
protein and still be well above the required free concentration and you do not 
need more ligand.

Of course, this only works for high-affinity ligands, for low affinity ligands 
it is quite a different story. I also would try to use the highest possible 
ligand concentration, since in many cases, although the ligand should bind in 
theory, in practise it is quite a different story.

Good luck!
Herman




-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Sabine 
Schneider
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 6:27 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] Stabilization of crystals and ligand exchange

Hi everyone,

I am trying to get the structure of a protein-ligand complex were I need to 
exchange the ligand which it co-crystallises nicely with.
Problem: either they crack, disolve, turn brown,...  OR they still look very 
nice, well shaped but do not show a single reflection at the synchrotron!!!


Here is what I tried so far:

1) initially stabilising with higher precipitant (here PEG1500) before slowly 
transferring (*) it to the ligand-removal solution (= artifical mother liquor 
with higher PEG, ethylen glycol or glucose, but without initial ligand)

(*) by slow exchange I mean : initially mixing drop solution with 
stabilising/ligand-removal solution and adding it back to the drop stepwise 
before fully transferring it. Or calculation wise I have fully exchange the 
solution to the new solution

2) here I let them ist over night (if they did not disolve, crack or
whatever)
3) slow exchange transfer to the artificial ML with the new ligand (10mM), left 
them over night and directly froze them

'Best' so far (crystals still looking nice but no reflection...) was slow 
exchange into higher PEG, than to higher PEG with ethylenglycol (30% and also 
adding ethylenglycol to the reservoir), let them sit for over night, before 
again slow exchange to the solution with the new ligand in higher PEG and 30% 
ethylen glycol.

As I said here the crystals keep shape, but don't diffract at al

Re: [ccp4bb] Stabilization of crystals and ligand exchange

2012-10-18 Thread Sabine Schneider

Thanks a lot for all the excellent suggestions!
Lots more things to try now!

Cheers,
Sabine


On 10/18/2012 12:18 PM, Boaz Shaanan wrote:

Hi Sabine,

On top of the excellent suggestions of Herman, I was just wondering.   Do you 
have a structure of the ligand-bound protein? If you do and the ligand bound at 
crystal contact with another molecule, I would think that it would be hard to 
get it out without harming the crystals (although not impossible). This may 
help you decide which way to go for obtaining the ligand-free structure.

  Cheers,

 Boaz

Boaz Shaanan, Ph.D.
Dept. of Life Sciences
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Beer-Sheva 84105
Israel

E-mail: bshaa...@bgu.ac.il
Phone: 972-8-647-2220  Skype: boaz.shaanan
Fax:   972-8-647-2992 or 972-8-646-1710






From: CCP4 bulletin board [CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] on behalf of 
herman.schreu...@sanofi.com [herman.schreu...@sanofi.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 10:32 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Stabilization of crystals and ligand exchange

Hi Sabine,

The easy experiment to start with, is to take your best conditions (nice 
looking crystals, no diffraction) and instead of overnight wait 4-8 weeks. 
Sometimes ligand exchange is slow, or the ligand induces a conformational 
change which takes a long time to complete in the crystals. There are cases 
that after a number of weeks, diffraction came back.

However, even if the above experiment works, there will be the nagging 
uncertainty that the crystal packing may have prevented some completely 
unexpected, nature or science publication worthy conformational change. There 
will be no way around at least trying to cocrystallize your ligand. Your chance 
of success will depend on how your protein and ligand behave:

-your ligand causes your protein to precipitate. Here your chances are slim. 
You could try to use the ligand as a precipitant by slowly diffusing it in 
(e.g. in a capillary with some gel to separate the protein and ligand 
solutions).
-your ligand is poorly soluble. Here you have better chances. As you mentioned, 
one can add the dilute ligand to a dilute protein solution and then concentrate 
the complex. The amount of ligand needed depends on the affinity of the ligand 
for the protein. To get 90% occupancy, you need a free ligand concentration at 
least 10 times over the Kd (or ~IC50).

To give an example: if you use for crystallization 10 mg/ml of a 30 kDa 
protein, your protein concentration is ~0.33 mM. If your ligand has an affinity 
of 100 nM, you need a free ligand concentration of 1 µM, which is 300 fold less 
than what you need to saturate all binding sites in the protein. To account for 
uncertainties in protein concentrations, I would add 0.5 - 1.0 mM Ligand. If 
you dilute 10 fold, you have 33 µM protein and I would add 50-100 µM ligand, 
which is still well above the 1 µM free concentration needed. Even with 100 
fold dilution, you still just can dilute the ligand with the same factor as the 
protein and still be well above the required free concentration and you do not 
need more ligand.

Of course, this only works for high-affinity ligands, for low affinity ligands 
it is quite a different story. I also would try to use the highest possible 
ligand concentration, since in many cases, although the ligand should bind in 
theory, in practise it is quite a different story.

Good luck!
Herman




-Original Message-
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Sabine 
Schneider
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 6:27 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] Stabilization of crystals and ligand exchange

Hi everyone,

I am trying to get the structure of a protein-ligand complex were I need to 
exchange the ligand which it co-crystallises nicely with.
Problem: either they crack, disolve, turn brown,...  OR they still look very 
nice, well shaped but do not show a single reflection at the synchrotron!!!


Here is what I tried so far:

1) initially stabilising with higher precipitant (here PEG1500) before slowly 
transferring (*) it to the ligand-removal solution (= artifical mother liquor 
with higher PEG, ethylen glycol or glucose, but without initial ligand)

(*) by slow exchange I mean : initially mixing drop solution with 
stabilising/ligand-removal solution and adding it back to the drop stepwise 
before fully transferring it. Or calculation wise I have fully exchange the 
solution to the new solution

2) here I let them ist over night (if they did not disolve, crack or
whatever)
3) slow exchange transfer to the artificial ML with the new ligand (10mM), left 
them over night and directly froze them

'Best' so far (crystals still looking nice but no reflection...) was slow 
exchange into higher PEG, than to higher PEG with ethylenglycol (30% and also 
adding ethylenglycol to the reservoir), let them sit for over night, before 
again slow exchange to th

Re: [ccp4bb] Stabilization of crystals and ligand exchange

2012-10-18 Thread Dmitry Rodionov
Hi Sabine,

Glutaraldehyde crosslinking worked pretty good for various soaks in my 
experience.

J. Appl. Cryst. (1999). 32, 106-112[ doi:10.1107/S002188989801053X ]
A gentle vapor-diffusion technique for cross-linking of protein crystals for 
cryocrystallography
C. J. Lusty

Best regards,
Dmitry

On 2012-10-17, at 12:26 PM, Sabine Schneider wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> 
> I am trying to get the structure of a protein-ligand complex were I need to 
> exchange the ligand which it co-crystallises nicely with.
> Problem: either they crack, disolve, turn brown,...  OR they still look very 
> nice, well shaped but do not show a single reflection at the synchrotron!!!
> 
> 
> Here is what I tried so far:
> 
> 1) initially stabilising with higher precipitant (here PEG1500) before slowly 
> transferring (*) it to the ligand-removal solution (= artifical mother liquor 
> with higher PEG, ethylen glycol or glucose, but without initial ligand)
> 
> (*) by slow exchange I mean : initially mixing drop solution with 
> stabilising/ligand-removal solution and adding it back to the drop stepwise 
> before fully transferring it. Or calculation wise I have fully exchange the 
> solution to the new solution
> 
> 2) here I let them ist over night (if they did not disolve, crack or whatever)
> 3) slow exchange transfer to the artificial ML with the new ligand (10mM), 
> left them over night and directly froze them
> 
> 'Best' so far (crystals still looking nice but no reflection...) was slow 
> exchange into higher PEG, than to higher PEG with ethylenglycol (30% and also 
> adding ethylenglycol to the reservoir), let them sit for over night, before 
> again slow exchange to the solution with the new ligand in higher PEG and 30% 
> ethylen glycol.
> 
> As I said here the crystals keep shape, but don't diffract at all anymore. 
> Just freezing them with 30% ethylen glycol they diffract nicely to 2.5A on a 
> home source. But already after step one they are sometimes not happy anymore.
> 
> Co-crystallisation failed since when I add the ligand, which is not that 
> soluble to the purified protein, everything crashed out of solution. I am 
> thinking about to test adding the ligand to the diluted protein and 
> concentrate it together. But I don't have that much ligand, since the 
> synthesis is quite tedious The ligand can be dissolved in 30% 
> ethylenglycol to ~50mM
> 
> Thus I was wondering if someone has done successfully ligand exchange with 
> glutaraldehyd stabilised xtals?
> Or any ideas how to stabilise them? I appreciate any ideas or comments!
> 
> Sorry for the lengthy email!
> 
> Best,
> Sabine


Re: [ccp4bb] Stabilization of crystals and ligand exchange

2012-10-18 Thread Julia Griese

Hi Sabine,

I also have good experience with crosslinking crystals with 
glutaraldehyde to stabilise them for soaks with ligands that were only 
soluble in DMSO (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2006.06.007). More 
often than not it destroys the crystals, I think, but it's worth a try. 
If you can get crystals of the ligand-free protein which you then 
crosslink, then you might be able to add the ligand in ethylenglycol 
without destroying the crystals. We added the glutaraldehyde straight to 
the crystals, and that worked just fine, but the vapor-diffusion 
technique does sound like a much gentler method.
Exchanging one ligand for another is probably a different matter 
altogether. (Is the affinity of your second ligand higher? What's the 
off-rate of the first one?)


Good luck!

Julia


On 10/18/12 4:59 PM, Dmitry Rodionov wrote:

Hi Sabine,

Glutaraldehyde crosslinking worked pretty good for various soaks in my 
experience.

J. Appl. Cryst. (1999). 32, 106-112[ doi:10.1107/S002188989801053X ]
A gentle vapor-diffusion technique for cross-linking of protein crystals for 
cryocrystallography
C. J. Lusty

Best regards,
Dmitry

On 2012-10-17, at 12:26 PM, Sabine Schneider wrote:


Hi everyone,

I am trying to get the structure of a protein-ligand complex were I need to 
exchange the ligand which it co-crystallises nicely with.
Problem: either they crack, disolve, turn brown,...  OR they still look very 
nice, well shaped but do not show a single reflection at the synchrotron!!!


Here is what I tried so far:

1) initially stabilising with higher precipitant (here PEG1500) before slowly 
transferring (*) it to the ligand-removal solution (= artifical mother liquor 
with higher PEG, ethylen glycol or glucose, but without initial ligand)

(*) by slow exchange I mean : initially mixing drop solution with 
stabilising/ligand-removal solution and adding it back to the drop stepwise 
before fully transferring it. Or calculation wise I have fully exchange the 
solution to the new solution

2) here I let them ist over night (if they did not disolve, crack or whatever)
3) slow exchange transfer to the artificial ML with the new ligand (10mM), left 
them over night and directly froze them

'Best' so far (crystals still looking nice but no reflection...) was slow 
exchange into higher PEG, than to higher PEG with ethylenglycol (30% and also 
adding ethylenglycol to the reservoir), let them sit for over night, before 
again slow exchange to the solution with the new ligand in higher PEG and 30% 
ethylen glycol.

As I said here the crystals keep shape, but don't diffract at all anymore. Just 
freezing them with 30% ethylen glycol they diffract nicely to 2.5A on a home 
source. But already after step one they are sometimes not happy anymore.

Co-crystallisation failed since when I add the ligand, which is not that 
soluble to the purified protein, everything crashed out of solution. I am 
thinking about to test adding the ligand to the diluted protein and concentrate 
it together. But I don't have that much ligand, since the synthesis is quite 
tedious The ligand can be dissolved in 30% ethylenglycol to ~50mM

Thus I was wondering if someone has done successfully ligand exchange with 
glutaraldehyd stabilised xtals?
Or any ideas how to stabilise them? I appreciate any ideas or comments!

Sorry for the lengthy email!

Best,
Sabine


--
Dr. Julia Griese
Stockholm Center for Biomembrane Research
Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics
Stockholm University
106 91 Stockholm
Sweden

phone: +46-(0)8-162 746
email: gri...@dbb.su.se


Re: [ccp4bb] Stabilization of crystals and ligand exchange

2012-10-18 Thread Patrick Shaw Stewart
I say (of course I would!) why not try co-crystallization with random
microseeding using the crystals with the original ligand?

It usually allows you to control the number of crystals per drop too


On 18 October 2012 15:59, Dmitry Rodionov  wrote:

> Hi Sabine,
>
> Glutaraldehyde crosslinking worked pretty good for various soaks in my
> experience.
>
> J. Appl. Cryst. (1999). 32, 106-112[ doi:10.1107/S002188989801053X ]
> A gentle vapor-diffusion technique for cross-linking of protein crystals
> for cryocrystallography
> C. J. Lusty
>
> Best regards,
> Dmitry
>
> On 2012-10-17, at 12:26 PM, Sabine Schneider wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I am trying to get the structure of a protein-ligand complex were I need
> to exchange the ligand which it co-crystallises nicely with.
> > Problem: either they crack, disolve, turn brown,...  OR they still look
> very nice, well shaped but do not show a single reflection at the
> synchrotron!!!
> >
> >
> > Here is what I tried so far:
> >
> > 1) initially stabilising with higher precipitant (here PEG1500) before
> slowly transferring (*) it to the ligand-removal solution (= artifical
> mother liquor with higher PEG, ethylen glycol or glucose, but without
> initial ligand)
> >
> > (*) by slow exchange I mean : initially mixing drop solution with
> stabilising/ligand-removal solution and adding it back to the drop stepwise
> before fully transferring it. Or calculation wise I have fully exchange the
> solution to the new solution
> >
> > 2) here I let them ist over night (if they did not disolve, crack or
> whatever)
> > 3) slow exchange transfer to the artificial ML with the new ligand
> (10mM), left them over night and directly froze them
> >
> > 'Best' so far (crystals still looking nice but no reflection...) was
> slow exchange into higher PEG, than to higher PEG with ethylenglycol (30%
> and also adding ethylenglycol to the reservoir), let them sit for over
> night, before again slow exchange to the solution with the new ligand in
> higher PEG and 30% ethylen glycol.
> >
> > As I said here the crystals keep shape, but don't diffract at all
> anymore. Just freezing them with 30% ethylen glycol they diffract nicely to
> 2.5A on a home source. But already after step one they are sometimes not
> happy anymore.
> >
> > Co-crystallisation failed since when I add the ligand, which is not that
> soluble to the purified protein, everything crashed out of solution. I am
> thinking about to test adding the ligand to the diluted protein and
> concentrate it together. But I don't have that much ligand, since the
> synthesis is quite tedious The ligand can be dissolved in 30%
> ethylenglycol to ~50mM
> >
> > Thus I was wondering if someone has done successfully ligand exchange
> with glutaraldehyd stabilised xtals?
> > Or any ideas how to stabilise them? I appreciate any ideas or comments!
> >
> > Sorry for the lengthy email!
> >
> > Best,
> > Sabine
>



-- 
 patr...@douglas.co.ukDouglas Instruments Ltd.
 Douglas House, East Garston, Hungerford, Berkshire, RG17 7HD, UK
 Directors: Peter Baldock, Patrick Shaw Stewart

 http://www.douglas.co.uk
 Tel: 44 (0) 148-864-9090US toll-free 1-877-225-2034
 Regd. England 2177994, VAT Reg. GB 480 7371 36