Re: [ccp4bb] unbiased electron density map

2008-01-10 Thread Dirk Kostrewa


Am 10.01.2008 um 01:53 schrieb Dale Tronrud:
...

   Your quote bring up another matter.  An initial map, i.e. before
refinement, is unbiased if it is an omit map.  If you have done no
refinement and you leave the interesting part out of the calculation
of Fc there can not be any bias in either the Fo-Fc or the 2Fo-Fc map.
This is why an initial map is more reliable for proving binding of
a compound, for example, than a bias reduced map after refinement.

...

But isn't this only true, if the model that is put in was not refined  
against a related data set before? If the new Fobs are related to the  
old Fobs (against which the model was refined before) then you carry  
any model bias over to the new data, because a simple omit-map using  
the old data will have model bias.


Best regards,

Dirk.

***
Dirk Kostrewa
Gene Center, A 5.07
Ludwig-Maximilians-University
Feodor-Lynen-Str. 25
81377 Munich
Germany
Phone:  +49-89-2180-76845
Fax:+49-89-2180-76999
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***




Re: [ccp4bb] unbiased electron density map

2008-01-10 Thread Dale Tronrud

Dirk Kostrewa wrote:


Am 10.01.2008 um 01:53 schrieb Dale Tronrud:
...

   Your quote bring up another matter.  An initial map, i.e. before
refinement, is unbiased if it is an omit map.  If you have done no
refinement and you leave the interesting part out of the calculation
of Fc there can not be any bias in either the Fo-Fc or the 2Fo-Fc map.
This is why an initial map is more reliable for proving binding of
a compound, for example, than a bias reduced map after refinement.

...

But isn't this only true, if the model that is put in was not refined 
against a related data set before? If the new Fobs are related to the 
old Fobs (against which the model was refined before) then you carry any 
model bias over to the new data, because a simple omit-map using the old 
data will have model bias.




  Right you are, and it's an important point too.  My only defense
is that I said If you have done no refinement  I don't think
of the refinement of several models to data from isomorphous crystals
as separate refinements, but sometimes forget to mention this when
talking to others.  I should be more careful.

Dale Tronrud


[ccp4bb] unbiased electron density map

2008-01-09 Thread michael nelson
In my understanding, unbiased electron density map usually refers to the Fo-Fc 
map.But I have seen in some papers sentences like that The initial, unbiased 
2FoFc map is contoured at.I was a bit confused since I was told by my 
instructor that the 2Fo-Fc was usually biased.

Can anyone clear up this concept for me?
Mike

   
-
Looking for last minute shopping deals?  Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

Re: [ccp4bb] unbiased electron density map

2008-01-09 Thread Dale Tronrud

   A 2Fo-Fc map is simply an Fc map with two times the Fo-Fc map added
to it.  ( Fc + 2(Fo-Fc) = Fc + 2Fo - 2Fc = 2Fo - Fc )  The phase comes
from the Fc's.  The basic formulation is biased toward the model used
to calculate the Fc's.  You did, after all, start with a pure Fc map!

   Various techniques are used to reduce bias in these maps.  Usually
a technique that reduces bias in one kind of map reduces the bias in
the other, since they are so closely related.  The procedures I know
of work by changing the calculation of Fc (and the weights on the
individual reflections, which aren't mentioned when using the simple
name Fo-Fc but are there none-the-less) and since the Fc is in both
maps both maps are debiased.

   These methods reduce bias.  Unbiased is a stronger claim and if
you use that word you should state clearly how you know the bias is
gone.

   Your quote bring up another matter.  An initial map, i.e. before
refinement, is unbiased if it is an omit map.  If you have done no
refinement and you leave the interesting part out of the calculation
of Fc there can not be any bias in either the Fo-Fc or the 2Fo-Fc map.
This is why an initial map is more reliable for proving binding of
a compound, for example, than a bias reduced map after refinement.

Dale Tronrud

michael nelson wrote:
In my understanding, unbiased electron density map usually refers to the 
Fo-Fc map.But I have seen in some papers sentences like that The 
initial, unbiased 2F_o -F_c map is contoured at.I was a bit confused 
since I was told by my instructor that the 2Fo-Fc was usually biased.


Can anyone clear up this concept for me?
Mike


Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! 
Search. 
http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51734/*http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping