RE: Real tape drive densities

2016-02-13 Thread CuriousMarc
> So, apparently my NRZI 9 track drive has the density option included, and
I don't know if there were any other 200/556 bpi 9 track drives out there. 
> When we got the drive I had hoped it would be a 7 track drive, but it
isn't.
Now I finally get it. NRZI, 200, 556 and 800 densities, but in 9 track all
the time. That's weird. You'd think the lower densities would be for 7
track. Could it be that it is a read-only for 7 tracks at lower density, but
a read/write at 800 for 9 tracks? If you looked at the head you might be
able to confirm if it has a dual 7 track / 9 track head.
Marc





Re: Stuck bits on 11/73 Clearpoint 4MB memory - how to repair?

2016-02-13 Thread John Robertson

On 02/12/2016 6:55 PM, Jay Jaeger wrote:

On 2/12/2016 5:32 PM, Jacob Ritorto wrote:

Hi,
 Seems I have bits 4 and 3 sticking on my Clearpoint QRAM-2-SAB-1 88b
4MB memory in my pdp11/73.

 Can anyone offer hints as to how to identify which component is broken
and how to go about repairing this?

 It's the only memory board in this machine, so I guess the problem
might actually be a bus or processor board, right?  I have no other q-bus
memory to test with, so can't do swapping / process of elimination to be
sure.

 Here's the manual:
http://www.arclightindustries.com/docs/Clearpoint-88B.pdf (which I probably
should add to manx or archive.org or something).

 Here's a snippet of the VMJA diags run illustrating bits 4 and 3
sticking.  During the next VMJA run, all addresses were showing up as
errored instead of just the ones ending in xxx000xx, so I guess it's
getting worse!

@173000g

   Starting system
BOOTING UP XXDP-XM EXTENDED MONITOR

XXDP-XM EXTENDED MONITOR - XXDP V2.5
REVISION: F0
BOOTED FROM DL0
124KW OF MEMORY
NON-UNIBUS SYSTEM

RESTART ADDRESS: 152000
TYPE "H" FOR HELP !

.R VMJA??
VMJAB0.BIC

  CVMJAB0  ECC/PARITY MEMORY DIAGNOSTIC
11/83 CACHE AVAILABLE
SWR = 00  NEW = 40


CSR MAP

CSR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F
MEMTYPE P


CSR NUMBER 0 CONTROLS TOO MANY BANKS
   2044K OF Q-BUS PARITY MEMORY
   2044K WORDS OF MEMORY TOTAL

 MEMORY CONFIGURATION MAP
  16K WORD BANKS
 1   2   3   4   5   6   7
 012345670123456701234567012345670123456701234567012345670123
ERRORS
MEMTYPE 
CSR 
PROTECT PP
 1   1   1   1   1   1   1
 0   1   2   3   4   5   6
 456701234567012345670123456701234567012345670123456701234567
ERRORS
MEMTYPE 
CSR 
PROTECT
 1
 7
 01234567
ERRORS
MEMTYPE 
CSR 
PROTECT
MEMORY DATA ERROR
   PCBANK  VADD PADD GOOD BAD XOR  CSR  MTYP INT PAT

027606   10  06  0100  10  30  20  0 P   27
027606   10  060002  0102  10  30  20  0 P   27
027606   10  060004  0104  10  30  20  0 P   27
027606   10  060006  0106  10  30  20  0 P   27
027606   10  060010  0110  10  30  20  0 P   27

<< SNIP >>

Well clearly it is only affecting certain address bits - or the
diagnostic would not run at all - note that it is starting at 01000,
  so that points to the memory, rather than the processor or bus, at
least as a first approximation.  No guarantees, but I'd sure start with
that as a working theory.

Another sign: this is right at the boundary between two rows.

If you can't find a schematic, you can use the address to identify the
address lines on the bus (See Table 3, page 1-5), and trace them on the
board to find the relevant row of chips.  Then use the bits the same way
to identify the specific chips.

If the chips are in sockets, you could always pull them one at a time to
find the relevant place in the array, as well.
...

Are you seeing the parity error light when this occurs?

Anyway, once the relevant chip(s) are identified, if they are in sockets
you can swap them with other bits or the same bits in other rows to
confirm.  Otherwise you get to unsolder the suspects, and put in new ones.

JRJ

An old trick we use for testing soldered in DRAM is to simply jam a 
known-to-be-good DRAM on top of the suspect one (legs bent in to make 
good contact). DRAM normally fail bits high and so putting a good one on 
top causes nothing different to happen if the suspect is good, but if 
the suspect is bad then the top DRAM will drive the output and your RAM 
test will pass.


Of course you wedge the good one on the suspect when the power is off. 
Unless you are in a rush, and willing to possibly kill your test DRAM.


As a side note - there appears to be an error message: "CSR NUMBER 0 
CONTROLS TOO MANY BANKS"  Or is that irrelevant? I know nothing about 
the PDP-11 test messages...


John :-#)#



Re: IBM System z9 available near Ann Arbor, MI

2016-02-13 Thread Christopher Satterfield
There's another z9 in Vancouver, WA. Has two tape drives with it as well,
but starting bid is $1200.
http://www.publicsurplus.com/sms/auction/view?auc=1542011


Re: pdp11/04 : the pics....

2016-02-13 Thread Eric Christopherson
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016, Charles Anthony wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Eric Christopherson <
> echristopher...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Feb 12, 2016 11:10 AM, "Jos Dreesen"  wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On ftp.dreesen.ch/PDP11 you can find some pics on how the rescued
> > PDP11/04 fits right in next to its cousin, a PDP8/a
> > >
> > > This 8a, BTW, has more memory (128K x 12)  and more oomph ( a FPP8A )
> > than the PDP11/04
> > >
> > >
> > > Jos
> >
> > I'm just getting a Synology page-not-found page.
> >
> 
> Try ftp://ftp.dreesen.ch/PDP11  (It's marked as an HTTP link, but's it
> really an FTP.

Oh, yes. I didn't see that the URL had no explicit protocol part. Should
have tried that.

-- 
Eric Christopherson


RE: IBM 3290 terminal

2016-02-13 Thread Dave Wade
> -Original Message-
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Kevin
> Bowling
> Sent: 13 February 2016 05:26
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> 
> Subject: Re: IBM 3290 terminal
> 
> Thanks for your opinion on compatibility.  I talked to a friend that is a 
> career
> IBMer and learned the support disks are 1.2MB floppies that go in the 2nd
> drive and are trivially created and imaged with PC/AT drives.

Can you just copy them to a 1.44 3.5" disk then and pop in the Memorex. I know 
the Memorex Disks are DOS compatible as I have some but the controller they 
went with was long gone when I acquired them...

> 
> Regards,
> Kevin
> 

Dave
G4UGM



Re: Real tape drive densities

2016-02-13 Thread Christian Corti

On Thu, 11 Feb 2016, Christian Corti wrote:

I have a 7970B (-236) with options 127, 006, 007, 012 and 023.


According to the HP 1000 Peripherals Selection Guide from 1982, page 16, 
option 236 specifies an 800bpi master magnetic tape subsystem with one 
drive and two-card 13181B interface.


And you can't mix 800 and 1600 bpi on the same interface for the HP 1000. 
You need either the 13181 for NRZI, or the 13183 for PE.


So, apparently my NRZI 9 track drive has the density option included, and 
I don't know if there were any other 200/556 bpi 9 track drives out 
there. When we got the drive I had hoped it would be a 7 track drive, but 
it isn't.


Christian


Re: Real tape drive densities

2016-02-13 Thread Christian Corti

On Fri, 12 Feb 2016, Curious Marc wrote:

Can you confirm it can read and write 9 track formats in PE 1600 cpi?


Was there ever a 7970B with PE? I have the manual matching this unit 
(serial number is marked on the cover page) and there's no mention of PE 
AFAIK. It's the 1971 version of the 7970B/C manual, the drive is from 
1971, too.
What I know is that I can read and write 800bpi 9 track tapes. I've not 
tried the other densities, yet.


Christian


Stuck bits on 11/73 Clearpoint 4MB memory - how to repair?

2016-02-13 Thread Jacob Ritorto
Hi,
Seems I have bits 4 and 3 sticking on my Clearpoint QRAM-2-SAB-1 88b
4MB memory in my pdp11/73.

Can anyone offer hints as to how to identify which component is broken
and how to go about repairing this?

It's the only memory board in this machine, so I guess the problem
might actually be a bus or processor board, right?  I have no other q-bus
memory to test with, so can't do swapping / process of elimination to be
sure.

Here's the manual:
http://www.arclightindustries.com/docs/Clearpoint-88B.pdf (which I probably
should add to manx or archive.org or something).

Here's a snippet of the VMJA diags run illustrating bits 4 and 3
sticking.  During the next VMJA run, all addresses were showing up as
errored instead of just the ones ending in xxx000xx, so I guess it's
getting worse!

@173000g

  Starting system
BOOTING UP XXDP-XM EXTENDED MONITOR

XXDP-XM EXTENDED MONITOR - XXDP V2.5
REVISION: F0
BOOTED FROM DL0
124KW OF MEMORY
NON-UNIBUS SYSTEM

RESTART ADDRESS: 152000
TYPE "H" FOR HELP !

.R VMJA??
VMJAB0.BIC

 CVMJAB0  ECC/PARITY MEMORY DIAGNOSTIC
   11/83 CACHE AVAILABLE
SWR = 00  NEW = 40


   CSR MAP

CSR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F
MEMTYPE P


CSR NUMBER 0 CONTROLS TOO MANY BANKS
  2044K OF Q-BUS PARITY MEMORY
  2044K WORDS OF MEMORY TOTAL

MEMORY CONFIGURATION MAP
 16K WORD BANKS
1   2   3   4   5   6   7
012345670123456701234567012345670123456701234567012345670123
ERRORS
MEMTYPE 
CSR 
PROTECT PP
1   1   1   1   1   1   1
0   1   2   3   4   5   6
456701234567012345670123456701234567012345670123456701234567
ERRORS
MEMTYPE 
CSR 
PROTECT
1
7
01234567
ERRORS
MEMTYPE 
CSR 
PROTECT
MEMORY DATA ERROR
  PCBANK  VADD PADD GOOD BAD XOR  CSR  MTYP INT PAT

027606   10  06  0100  10  30  20  0 P   27
027606   10  060002  0102  10  30  20  0 P   27
027606   10  060004  0104  10  30  20  0 P   27
027606   10  060006  0106  10  30  20  0 P   27
027606   10  060010  0110  10  30  20  0 P   27
027606   11  06  0110  11  31  20  0 P   27
027606   11  060002  0112  11  31  20  0 P   27
027606   11  060004  0114  11  31  20  0 P   27
027606   11  060006  0116  11  31  20  0 P   27
027606   11  060010  01100010  11  31  20  0 P   27
027606   12  06  0120  12  32  20  0 P   27
027606   12  060002  0122  12  32  20  0 P   27
027606   12  060004  0124  12  32  20  0 P   27
027606   12  060006  0126  12  32  20  0 P   27
027606   12  060010  01200010  12  32  20  0 P   27
027606   13  06  0130  13  33  20  0 P   27
027606   13  060002  0132  13  33  20  0 P   27
027606   13  060004  0134  13  33  20  0 P   27
027606   13  060006  0136  13  33  20  0 P   27
027606   13  060010  01300010  13  33  20  0 P   27
027606   14  06  0140  14  34  20  0 P   27
027606   14  060002  0142  14  34  20  0 P   27
027606   14  060004  0144  14  34  20  0 P   27
027606   14  060006  0146  14  34  20  0 P   27
027606   14  060010  01400010  14  34  20  0 P   27
027606   15  06  0150  15  35  20  0 P   27
027606   15  060002  0152  15  35  20  0 P   27
027606   15  060004  0154  15  35  20  0 P   27
027606   15  060006  0156  15  35  20  0 P   27
027606   15  060010  01500010  15  35  20  0 P   27
027606   16  06  0160  16  36  20  0 P   27
027606   16  060002  0162  16  36  20  0 P   27
027606   16  060004  0164  16  36  20  0 P   27
027606   16  060006  0166  16  36  20  0 P   27
027606   16  060010  01600010  16  36  20  0 P   27
027606   17  06  0170  17  37  20  0 P   27
027606   17  060002  0172  17  37  20  0 P   27
027606   17  060004  0174  17  37  20  0 P   27
027606   17 

Re: Stuck bits on 11/73 Clearpoint 4MB memory - how to repair?

2016-02-13 Thread Jay Jaeger
On 2/12/2016 5:32 PM, Jacob Ritorto wrote:
> Hi,
> Seems I have bits 4 and 3 sticking on my Clearpoint QRAM-2-SAB-1 88b
> 4MB memory in my pdp11/73.
> 
> Can anyone offer hints as to how to identify which component is broken
> and how to go about repairing this?
> 
> It's the only memory board in this machine, so I guess the problem
> might actually be a bus or processor board, right?  I have no other q-bus
> memory to test with, so can't do swapping / process of elimination to be
> sure.
> 
> Here's the manual:
> http://www.arclightindustries.com/docs/Clearpoint-88B.pdf (which I probably
> should add to manx or archive.org or something).
> 
> Here's a snippet of the VMJA diags run illustrating bits 4 and 3
> sticking.  During the next VMJA run, all addresses were showing up as
> errored instead of just the ones ending in xxx000xx, so I guess it's
> getting worse!
> 
> @173000g
> 
>   Starting system
> BOOTING UP XXDP-XM EXTENDED MONITOR
> 
> XXDP-XM EXTENDED MONITOR - XXDP V2.5
> REVISION: F0
> BOOTED FROM DL0
> 124KW OF MEMORY
> NON-UNIBUS SYSTEM
> 
> RESTART ADDRESS: 152000
> TYPE "H" FOR HELP !
> 
> .R VMJA??
> VMJAB0.BIC
> 
>  CVMJAB0  ECC/PARITY MEMORY DIAGNOSTIC
>11/83 CACHE AVAILABLE
> SWR = 00  NEW = 40
> 
> 
>CSR MAP
> 
> CSR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F
> MEMTYPE P
> 
> 
> CSR NUMBER 0 CONTROLS TOO MANY BANKS
>   2044K OF Q-BUS PARITY MEMORY
>   2044K WORDS OF MEMORY TOTAL
> 
> MEMORY CONFIGURATION MAP
>  16K WORD BANKS
> 1   2   3   4   5   6   7
> 012345670123456701234567012345670123456701234567012345670123
> ERRORS
> MEMTYPE 
> CSR 
> PROTECT PP
> 1   1   1   1   1   1   1
> 0   1   2   3   4   5   6
> 456701234567012345670123456701234567012345670123456701234567
> ERRORS
> MEMTYPE 
> CSR 
> PROTECT
> 1
> 7
> 01234567
> ERRORS
> MEMTYPE 
> CSR 
> PROTECT
> MEMORY DATA ERROR
>   PCBANK  VADD PADD GOOD BAD XOR  CSR  MTYP INT PAT
> 
> 027606   10  06  0100  10  30  20  0 P   27
> 027606   10  060002  0102  10  30  20  0 P   27
> 027606   10  060004  0104  10  30  20  0 P   27
> 027606   10  060006  0106  10  30  20  0 P   27
> 027606   10  060010  0110  10  30  20  0 P   27

<< SNIP >>

Well clearly it is only affecting certain address bits - or the
diagnostic would not run at all - note that it is starting at 01000,
 so that points to the memory, rather than the processor or bus, at
least as a first approximation.  No guarantees, but I'd sure start with
that as a working theory.

Another sign: this is right at the boundary between two rows.

If you can't find a schematic, you can use the address to identify the
address lines on the bus (See Table 3, page 1-5), and trace them on the
board to find the relevant row of chips.  Then use the bits the same way
to identify the specific chips.

If the chips are in sockets, you could always pull them one at a time to
find the relevant place in the array, as well.

I expect this is not the issue, but, one has to ask these things, just
in case.  Did this memory work before? I ask because this is the 19th
bit. If the backplane is a Q18 backplane, that might be a problem?
Along those same lines, make sure that jumper P07 is positioned
correctly for a 22 bit address, and that P05 and P06 are set correctly
for the memory size.

Are you seeing the parity error light when this occurs?

Anyway, once the relevant chip(s) are identified, if they are in sockets
you can swap them with other bits or the same bits in other rows to
confirm.  Otherwise you get to unsolder the suspects, and put in new ones.

JRJ


Re: pdp11/04 : the pics....

2016-02-13 Thread Pete Lancashire
Clicking on the link gets me: Sorry, the page you are looking for is not
found.

cut/patse and trying as a fto server times out



On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Jay West  wrote:

> No, the "pride of the collection" must be the HP calculator on top ;)
>
> J
>
>
>
>


Re: Stuck bits on 11/73 Clearpoint 4MB memory - how to repair?

2016-02-13 Thread Glen Slick
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Jacob Ritorto  wrote:
> Hi,
> Seems I have bits 4 and 3 sticking on my Clearpoint QRAM-2-SAB-1 88b
> 4MB memory in my pdp11/73.
>
> Can anyone offer hints as to how to identify which component is broken
> and how to go about repairing this?

Are the 256Kx1 DRAM chips in sockets? If they are it shouldn't be too
hard to come up with a scheme for exchanging some of the DRAM chips to
see if the stuck bits move and then work out which chip positions map
to which bits and then which DRAM chips need to be replaced.