Re: GT-40 etc.
That actually seems not too bad. If I needed another big project I'd have really thought about bidding it up. Thanks, Jonathan On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 3:54 PM, Kyle Owen via cctalkwrote: > A tenth the price of the Twiggy Lisa makes that auction look almost > affordable! Final price was $5600. > > Kyle >
Re: GT-40 etc.
A tenth the price of the Twiggy Lisa makes that auction look almost affordable! Final price was $5600. Kyle
Re: Yet More S-100 stuff from Sellam's collection listed for sale
Cool, can you send a picture of that BYT-8 front panel? =] -- Anders Nelson +1 (517) 775-6129 www.erogear.com On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 4:31 AM, Sellam Ismail via cctalk < cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > Hello again, Folks! > > I've listed yet another batch of S-100 goodies: > > http://www.vcfed.org/forum/showthread.php?61192-Sellam-s- > S-100-Hardware-Software-and-Peripherals-Sales-Thread=495275#post495275 > > The latest batch includes a new Processor Technology kit, a BYT-8 front > panel, a Commodore PET to S-100 interface board, a couple Wameco > backplanes, a gaggle of Cromemco boards, and much more. > > Thanks! > > Sellam >
Re: Adaptec 1522A SCSI Support (was re: New TestFDC Results Registry)
Hi, On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 08:26:45PM -0600, Jason T via cctalk wrote: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:55 PM, Richard Ciniwrote: > > I use this card as a floppy/disk controller in a PC/AT that's used solely > > for imaging. The controller is connected to two Seagate ST-2502N (442MB) > > hard drives running MS-DOS 6.22. Works like a champ. Cables are readily > > available on eBay but since they're regular 50-pin IDC connectors, you can > > DIY if needed -- connectors are readily available. > > Do you have (and can you post) the MS-DOS drivers for that card? I > also run one in my floppy imager machine, which dual-boots btw. MS-DOS > and some later Linux. Having SCSI for at least one of the OSes would > be nice. > > I could also switch the other partition over to FreeBSD, as Warner L > suggested. I think you want this: http://files.markgthomas.com/dl/adaptec/EZSCSI40.IMD (This URL is temporary.) I just found, imaged, and installed it, on my disk-imaging PC using an AHA-1522A: --- IMD 1.18: 24/12/2017 4:54:15 Adaptec EZ-SCSI v4.01a Setup Diskette Disk 1of1 HD 3.5 Windows 95/NT/3.1x and DOS Drivers >From Windows 95 or NT Click Start, Run, Type a:\setup >From Windows 3.1 or NT 3.52 File/Run Type a:\setup >From DOS Type a:, Type dosinst --- Mark -- Mark G. Thomas (m...@misty.com), KC3DRE
Re: Reviving ARPAnet
On 01/19/2018 01:25 AM, Christian Corti via cctalk wrote: Why do you want to convert between the two frame types? They can happily coexist on the same segment. In fact I'm using this setup on some Linux servers that provide both ordinary IP services (like NFS) and Novell shares (using Mars NWE) for DOS clients - on the same interface. My intention was to allow IP running on top of something other than Ethernet II to be able to communicate with IP on top of Ethernet II. Preferably via a router and not some sort of bump in the wire frame conversion. -- Grant. . . . unix || die
Re: GT-40 etc.
I'm sure they're out there in bitsavers, but I have an original copy of the GT-40 engineering drawings. Sometimes it's nice to have the printed copy to work from. Bill On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 8:05 AM, Philipp Hachtmann via cctalk < cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > > On 12.01.2018 23:24, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote: > >> this is going to go for an insane amt of money >> > > Oh, yess! I am beginning to feel rich :-P > >
Re: Adaptec 1522A SCSI Support (was re: New TestFDC Results Registry)
I often have a 1522A in my disk imaging machine. Linux supports it, which means I can use `ddrescue` with it. It'll also talk to a lot of older/slower drives that my 2940UW doesn't like (e.g. very old DEC drives from VAXen, it does better with some old tape drives than the 2940UW). It's slow, but I've also found that it's less likely to cause a kernel panic if you're working on a disk that is very near the end of its life. I suspect that's due to being a PIO device. Thanks, Jonathan On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 6:31 AM, jim stephens via cctalk < cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > > > On 1/18/2018 5:44 PM, Jason T via cctalk wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 6:58 PM, Adrian Graham via cctalk >>wrote: >> >>> I could, but I guess by the time I’ve sourced a replacement I might as >>> well have bought an AHA-1522A instead, I have a couple of scouts out >>> looking for them as we speak :) The 1522A is a full pass for TESTFDC. >>> >> Has anyone using one of these cards made use of the SCSI function? It >> has a Centronics 50 connector, which isn't terribly useful unless >> you've got the right cable, but if you're building an all-in-one >> imaging machine, it might be handy to have SCSI capability as well. >> It seems the driver hasn't been in Linux for quite a few versions. >> Not sure about the BSDs. >> >> >> The 1522 was based on a lower cost chipset which Adaptec introduced to > complement the 154x boards. SCSI was suffering from being undercut by > other interfaces in the market due to the nonstandard bios interface that > the systems equipped with the 154x boards had to run with as bios got more > complicated. > > Also I think this was the first chip that could be in the system w/o > having the bios initiate the interface. The 154x (1542 for example) > required having the bus initiated and reset at boot by the bios, since > there was a lot of logic involved in that chip. The 152x and the like > could be fully integrated into a reasonable sized driver and only have to > go the the time consuming process of resetting and enumerating devices and > initiators, etc. when needed. > > As Richard said for use with scanners and other peripheral media. The > systems became very annoying if you didn't have boot media attached to the > system controller to justify all the time it took to do that on every boot. > > And this and the 151x controllers were priced lower. > > I suspect the 154x and the PCI interface controllers Adaptec had should > still be in the kernel. You might be able to find the drivers and enable > them in the Linux Kernel, unless some kernel driver rewrite had some > feature that couldn't be implemented for this controller. > > I don't have a lot of references for the above, and if anyone has updates > or comments, please add them. I'm still using the HP DL360 and DL380 and > the like which have the higher end controllers integrated in for the only > SCSI work I do, and have not followed these or other support for a long > time for parallel scsi interfaces. > > DL360's are so cheap that buying one with SCSI drives in the Generation 5 > or 6 or later is the best way I know of to run SCSI. Not great for power, > but they are excellent and solid systems with a lot of OS support. > thanks > Jim >
Re: GT-40 etc.
On 12.01.2018 23:24, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote: this is going to go for an insane amt of money Oh, yess! I am beginning to feel rich :-P
Re: Adaptec 1522A SCSI Support (was re: New TestFDC Results Registry)
On 1/18/2018 5:44 PM, Jason T via cctalk wrote: On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 6:58 PM, Adrian Graham via cctalkwrote: I could, but I guess by the time I’ve sourced a replacement I might as well have bought an AHA-1522A instead, I have a couple of scouts out looking for them as we speak :) The 1522A is a full pass for TESTFDC. Has anyone using one of these cards made use of the SCSI function? It has a Centronics 50 connector, which isn't terribly useful unless you've got the right cable, but if you're building an all-in-one imaging machine, it might be handy to have SCSI capability as well. It seems the driver hasn't been in Linux for quite a few versions. Not sure about the BSDs. The 1522 was based on a lower cost chipset which Adaptec introduced to complement the 154x boards. SCSI was suffering from being undercut by other interfaces in the market due to the nonstandard bios interface that the systems equipped with the 154x boards had to run with as bios got more complicated. Also I think this was the first chip that could be in the system w/o having the bios initiate the interface. The 154x (1542 for example) required having the bus initiated and reset at boot by the bios, since there was a lot of logic involved in that chip. The 152x and the like could be fully integrated into a reasonable sized driver and only have to go the the time consuming process of resetting and enumerating devices and initiators, etc. when needed. As Richard said for use with scanners and other peripheral media. The systems became very annoying if you didn't have boot media attached to the system controller to justify all the time it took to do that on every boot. And this and the 151x controllers were priced lower. I suspect the 154x and the PCI interface controllers Adaptec had should still be in the kernel. You might be able to find the drivers and enable them in the Linux Kernel, unless some kernel driver rewrite had some feature that couldn't be implemented for this controller. I don't have a lot of references for the above, and if anyone has updates or comments, please add them. I'm still using the HP DL360 and DL380 and the like which have the higher end controllers integrated in for the only SCSI work I do, and have not followed these or other support for a long time for parallel scsi interfaces. DL360's are so cheap that buying one with SCSI drives in the Generation 5 or 6 or later is the best way I know of to run SCSI. Not great for power, but they are excellent and solid systems with a lot of OS support. thanks Jim
Re: Adaptec 1522A SCSI Support (was re: New TestFDC Results Registry)
On 1/19/2018 12:08 AM, TeoZ via cctalk wrote: Didn’t early SUN gear have SCSI floppy drives? There is a SCSI floppy drive branded with Tadpole, I think. thanks Jim -Original Message- From: Fred Cisin via cctalk Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2018 9:18 PM To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts Subject: Re: Adaptec 1522A SCSI Support (was re: New TestFDC Results Registry) On Thu, 18 Jan 2018, Jason T via cctalk wrote: Has anyone using one of these cards made use of the SCSI function? It has a Centronics 50 connector, which isn't terribly useful unless you've got the right cable, but if you're building an all-in-one imaging machine, it might be handy to have SCSI capability as well. It seems the driver hasn't been in Linux for quite a few versions. Not sure about the BSDs. A few SCSI floppy drives existed, but they were never very common. Only SCSI floppy that I remember having was a "Floptical" (20MB), that also handled 1.4M Or, are you suggesting putting together an imaging machine that also handles HDD, CD-ROM, some tape cartridges, etc.? --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Yet More S-100 stuff from Sellam's collection listed for sale
Hello again, Folks! I've listed yet another batch of S-100 goodies: http://www.vcfed.org/forum/showthread.php?61192-Sellam-s-S-100-Hardware-Software-and-Peripherals-Sales-Thread=495275#post495275 The latest batch includes a new Processor Technology kit, a BYT-8 front panel, a Commodore PET to S-100 interface board, a couple Wameco backplanes, a gaggle of Cromemco boards, and much more. Thanks! Sellam
Re: Adaptec 1522A SCSI Support (was re: New TestFDC Results Registry)
Christian Corti via cctalk wrote: > On Fri, 19 Jan 2018, TeoZ wrote: > > Didn?t early SUN gear have SCSI floppy drives? > > No, SUN always used standard floppy controllers. But HP and DEC used them, > although it was not very common. The floppy drives are standard TEAC > FD-235HF with an additional SCSI floppy controller board. > > Christian Christian weißt Du wo man Sowas noch auftreiben könnte? Ich suche nach einer Möglichkeit Floppies mit "modernen Computern" zu lesen und Schreiben..natürlich noch viel lieber 5,25 Zoll.. SCSI hab ich in so gut wie allen Rechnern, aber die Motherboards haben keinen FDC mehr und auch keine ISA Slots um sowas wie einen 1542 rein zu stöpseln. Gruß, Holm -- Technik Service u. Handel Tiffe, www.tsht.de, Holm Tiffe, Freiberger Straße 42, 09600 Oberschöna, USt-Id: DE253710583 i...@tsht.de Fax +49 3731 74200 Tel +49 3731 74222 Mobil: 0172 8790 741
Re: Adaptec 1522A SCSI Support (was re: New TestFDC Results Registry)
On Fri, 19 Jan 2018, TeoZ wrote: Didn?t early SUN gear have SCSI floppy drives? No, SUN always used standard floppy controllers. But HP and DEC used them, although it was not very common. The floppy drives are standard TEAC FD-235HF with an additional SCSI floppy controller board. Christian
Re: New TestFDC Results Registry
On Thu, 18 Jan 2018, Chuck Guzis wrote: I've had some decent results with P4 and Socket 939 motherboards but after that, not so much. I don't know if that's a bright-line rule, but it seems to hold with my gear. My quite current Socket AM3+ board with six-core CPU and 16GB of RAM (to be precise, an ASrock 890FX Deluxe5) has a floppy connector (one of the reason I chose that board), and it supports FM and MFM. Christian
Re: Reviving ARPAnet
On Thu, 18 Jan 2018, Grant Taylor wrote: I'm wondering if it might be possible to use an old NetWare 4.x / 5.x box as a router to convert from one Ethernet frame type to another Ethernet frame type. I.e. from IP over Ethernet II frames to IP over 802.3 frames. Why do you want to convert between the two frame types? They can happily coexist on the same segment. In fact I'm using this setup on some Linux servers that provide both ordinary IP services (like NFS) and Novell shares (using Mars NWE) for DOS clients - on the same interface. Christian
Re: Adaptec 1522A SCSI Support (was re: New TestFDC Results Registry)
Didn’t early SUN gear have SCSI floppy drives? -Original Message- From: Fred Cisin via cctalk Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2018 9:18 PM To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts Subject: Re: Adaptec 1522A SCSI Support (was re: New TestFDC Results Registry) On Thu, 18 Jan 2018, Jason T via cctalk wrote: Has anyone using one of these cards made use of the SCSI function? It has a Centronics 50 connector, which isn't terribly useful unless you've got the right cable, but if you're building an all-in-one imaging machine, it might be handy to have SCSI capability as well. It seems the driver hasn't been in Linux for quite a few versions. Not sure about the BSDs. A few SCSI floppy drives existed, but they were never very common. Only SCSI floppy that I remember having was a "Floptical" (20MB), that also handled 1.4M Or, are you suggesting putting together an imaging machine that also handles HDD, CD-ROM, some tape cartridges, etc.? --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus