Re: ISO: Cipher F880 tape drive, Fujitsu Eagle disk drive
Ok, I think I have the 2312 or 2322. Could emulate an RM03 disk or two. Starting to work on digging things out of the shed, the Decsystem20 box is in the back there somewhere... C On 4/3/2020 7:21 PM, Alan Perry via cctalk wrote: The Eagle is M2351 with 270mm platters. On 4/3/20 4:13 PM, Chris Zach via cctalk wrote: Is the Eagle the little 8 inch one or the 2284? I have one of the smaller ones in my shed C On 4/3/2020 6:42 PM, Josh Dersch via cctalk wrote: I'm working on restoring an LMI Lambda, which is missing both its tape drive and its disk drive. If anyone has a Cipher F880 9-track drive or a Fujitsu Eagle SMD drive, drop me a line. Be nice if they were in working condition, but so long as they're repairable I can work with 'em. 2351 Thanks! Josh
Re: ISO: Cipher F880 tape drive, Fujitsu Eagle disk drive
The Eagle is M2351 with 270mm platters. On 4/3/20 4:13 PM, Chris Zach via cctalk wrote: Is the Eagle the little 8 inch one or the 2284? I have one of the smaller ones in my shed C On 4/3/2020 6:42 PM, Josh Dersch via cctalk wrote: I'm working on restoring an LMI Lambda, which is missing both its tape drive and its disk drive. If anyone has a Cipher F880 9-track drive or a Fujitsu Eagle SMD drive, drop me a line. Be nice if they were in working condition, but so long as they're repairable I can work with 'em. 2351 Thanks! Josh
Re: ISO: Cipher F880 tape drive, Fujitsu Eagle disk drive
Is the Eagle the little 8 inch one or the 2284? I have one of the smaller ones in my shed C On 4/3/2020 6:42 PM, Josh Dersch via cctalk wrote: I'm working on restoring an LMI Lambda, which is missing both its tape drive and its disk drive. If anyone has a Cipher F880 9-track drive or a Fujitsu Eagle SMD drive, drop me a line. Be nice if they were in working condition, but so long as they're repairable I can work with 'em. Thanks! Josh
ISO: Cipher F880 tape drive, Fujitsu Eagle disk drive
I'm working on restoring an LMI Lambda, which is missing both its tape drive and its disk drive. If anyone has a Cipher F880 9-track drive or a Fujitsu Eagle SMD drive, drop me a line. Be nice if they were in working condition, but so long as they're repairable I can work with 'em. Thanks! Josh
Re: ACM library opened
On 2020-04-03 1:12 PM, Robert Armstrong via cctalk wrote: >> Paul Koning wrote: >> ... >> ACM has currently opened up all of its digital archives during these > pandemic times > > This is great - thanks for passing along the information! > > Now, if the IEEE would just do the same thing... ... Permanently. --T > > Bob > > > >
Re: ACM library opened
bring pressure on ieee to do so! --Ed# In a message dated 4/3/2020 11:17:53 AM US Mountain Standard Time, cctalk@classiccmp.org writes: >ACM has currently opened up all of its digital archives during these pandemic times This is great - thanks for passing along the information! Now, if the IEEE would just do the same thing... Bob
RE: ACM library opened
>Paul Koning wrote: >... >ACM has currently opened up all of its digital archives during these pandemic times This is great - thanks for passing along the information! Now, if the IEEE would just do the same thing... Bob
Re: Identifying Machine for DEC Memory
On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 5:04 AM Liam Proven via cctalk wrote: > On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 18:00, Warner Losh wrote: > > > > Thanks! Nice talk! I wish I'd stuck around but I was kinda fried after > my talk... > > I understand. I was the same, and went to the café for a couple of beers. > :-) > > > Surprised you didn't mention that we had 80 column xterms due to 24x80 > 25x80 terminals from the 70s and 80s. But this mirrored the 25x80 column > 3270s from the 60s which mirrored cards which were 80 columns which owe > their existence to Hollerith adapting the Jacquard looms from the 19th > century which automated the looms of the 18th century... :) > > I did know about that story (this one: > http://exple.tive.org/blarg/2019/10/23/80x25/ ) but there seems to be > a lot of controversy around it... > Yea, it isn't as straight a line as I paint it... > > https://retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/questions/5629/why-did-80x25-become-the-text-monitor-standard This explanation ignores that terminals like the VT52 pre-date the PC world and were made for some custom gear that DEC engineers made that had no relationship to NTSC. VT-52 was 1974 and had 80x24 lines. The Apple ][ was also designed for the TV, but wasn't 24x80 because most TVs at the time couldn't cope, but even it had custom CRTs and even on those custom CRTs there was no 80 column mode standard. But the VT-52 was just a reflection of the VT-50 which was 80x12 lines which was a reflection of the Datapoint-2200 which was introduced in 1970 which was 80x12 lines as well. DEC copied this, I've been told in classes in school ("the early terminals" is all I recall now), but I have no good references between the dots here. So the connection between 029 punch cards and terminals is clear... But beyond that back to hollerith and the census to the 029 punch cards is less clear... https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21340548 > > And I always find I need to cut a lot of material to fit the time > slot, in any case. > Ah, that's true... And the whole 80 column thing is pervasive today as a standard for any reason... Warner
Re: Identifying Machine for DEC Memory
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 18:00, Warner Losh wrote: > > Thanks! Nice talk! I wish I'd stuck around but I was kinda fried after my > talk... I understand. I was the same, and went to the café for a couple of beers. :-) > Surprised you didn't mention that we had 80 column xterms due to 24x80 25x80 > terminals from the 70s and 80s. But this mirrored the 25x80 column 3270s from > the 60s which mirrored cards which were 80 columns which owe their existence > to Hollerith adapting the Jacquard looms from the 19th century which > automated the looms of the 18th century... :) I did know about that story (this one: http://exple.tive.org/blarg/2019/10/23/80x25/ ) but there seems to be a lot of controversy around it... https://retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/questions/5629/why-did-80x25-become-the-text-monitor-standard https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21340548 And I always find I need to cut a lot of material to fit the time slot, in any case. -- Liam Proven – Profile: https://about.me/liamproven Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk – gMail/gTalk/gHangouts: lpro...@gmail.com Twitter/Facebook/LinkedIn/Flickr: lproven – Skype: liamproven UK: +44 7939-087884 – ČR (+ WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal): +420 702 829 053
RE: Monroe 7860
As Monroe Systems is still in business. Contact them, they might have an historian that could help you. https://monroe-systems.com Also, there a brochure for sale on ebait. There is a preview of 4 pages that supplies some general info (for free) https://www.ebay.com/itm/VINTAGE-1983-MONROE-7860-DESKTOP-ACCOUNTING-CALCULATOR-BROCHURE-23-LB-32-CHAR/381996877124?hash=item58f0c9c544:g:NTAAAOSw32lYwl6G In 1972, I programmed Burroughs L3000 accounting machines that could read magnetic ledger cards. I wonder if the Monroe could use the same kind. Wayne -Original Message- From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Eric Smith via cctalk Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2020 2:05 PM To: dwight; General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts Subject: Re: Monroe 7860 On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 11:27 AM dwight via cctalk wrote: > You might dump the ROM and look for ascii strings. > I've wondered if it was possible to glue strops of tape wide enough to > cards for these card readers. > Of course, if they were preformatted, it will be a bit more difficult. > I have a few reels of two-inch video tape which I've used to make crude magnetic cards for old HP desktop machines.
Re: FYI: ACM library opened
Great. Now I can finally get copies of my Siggraph papers. Marc On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 1:50 PM Paul Koning via cctalk wrote: > This might be of interest to many of the people on the list. > > paul > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > > > >> Also, ACM has currently opened up all of its digital archives during > these pandemic times, ... https://dl.acm.org/action/doSearch > > >