Re: cctalk Digest, Vol 94, Issue 20
Dziękuję za twoją wiadomość. Przepraszam, jestem na wczasach i odpowiem później.
Re: cctalk Digest, Vol 94, Issue 20
On 7/16/22 10:00, Jan Mleczko via cctalk wrote: > Dziękuję za twoją wiadomość. Przepraszam, jestem na wczasach i odpowiem > później. For those not conversant in Polish, he said he's on vacation/holiday and will answer later. FYI, Chuck
OT: foreign language away messages was Re: cctalk Digest, Vol 94, Issue 20
>> Dziękuję za twoją wiadomość. Przepraszam, jestem na wczasach i odpowiem >> później. > > For those not conversant in Polish, he said he's on vacation/holiday and > will answer later. See, this is why watching Borat is educational: I actually knew what the first word meant. And I also knew why wearing mankinis in Kazakhstan is normal and masculine. -- personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ -- Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckai...@floodgap.com -- Quoth the Web Server, "404!" ---
Re: cctalk Digest, Vol 94, Issue 20
On 7/16/22 14:11, Chuck Guzis via cctalk wrote: On 7/16/22 10:00, Jan Mleczko via cctalk wrote: Dziękuję za twoją wiadomość. Przepraszam, jestem na wczasach i odpowiem później. For those not conversant in Polish, he said he's on vacation/holiday and will answer later. FYI, Chuck Dziękuję. :-) bill
Re: cctalk Digest, Vol 94, Issue 20
On 7/16/22 12:30, Bill Gunshannon via cctalk wrote: >> For those not conversant in Polish, he said he's on vacation/holiday and >> will answer later. >> >> FYI, >> Chuck > > Dziękuję. > Nėr už ką --Chuck
Re: Retire cctech
Will posts to cctech alias to cctalk if I forget? Bill On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 12:02 AM jim stephens via cctalk < cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: > I'm good with the duality going away. I see in a day longer ago that > the split made sense and also was more useful. > > I don't think I've seen the cctech separate out much that can't be > located and followed anyway. > > Appreciate all the efforts. I'll look at my archives. I think Jay had > all I had the he did not. I also have a very long archive composed of > emails and not from scraping the archives off the web page, though I > don't know that is much use. > > thanks > Jim > > On 7/13/2022 7:01 PM, Dennis Boone via cctalk wrote: > > > Are the old posts all archived and searchable? I have a gap from 2016 > > > through 2022, and before that it is complete back to Mar 29, 2007 (I > > > think it is complete). > > > > I think I have cctech back to 2005 for import into the new mailman web > > system. I also have the mailman2 pipermail archives that go back to > > 2014. > > > > I have cctalk archives back to the beginning in 1998? to load, and the > > pipermail back to 2014. > > > > The pipermail archives are online now. The stuff to load still requires > > some massaging to get it to load cleanly. Since it's somewhere north of > > 400,000 messages, and I'm not getting diagnostics about _why_ some > > messages aren't getting loaded, it's taking some time to finish the > > cleanup. > > > > De > >
Re: cctalk Digest, Vol 94, Issue 21
Dziękuję za twoją wiadomość. Przepraszam, jestem na wczasach i odpowiem później.
Re: List migration
I recently used "Reply" instead of "Reply List" to attempt a private reply. That attempted to send to the list anyway, but I didn't notice. That lead to three days of "delivery delayed", and finally to "Delivery Status Notification (Failure)", with this reason given: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [209.85.160.47] blocked using dnsbl.sorbs.net; Currently Sending Spam See: http://www.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?209.85.160.47 So, here's me now, testing whether I can reply to the list at all. Vince
