Re: WTB/WTT: Intel MDS-800

2021-10-12 Thread Mich.com via cctalk
I have a few Intellec MDS Series II development systems.  They can host an 
ICE-85.  I’d sell you one. They are VERY heavy. I’m in Michigan.

Dave

Sent from my iPhone.

> On Oct 12, 2021, at 4:51 PM, Bill Degnan via cctalk  
> wrote:
> 
> and here are detailed pics of the Shugart jumpers
> https://www.vintagecomputer.net/intel/MDS-720/
> 
> Maybe you could try a set of drives set to be 720's and see if that gets
> you going.
> 
> BIll
> 
>> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 4:50 PM Bill Degnan  wrote:
>> 
>> Here is an MDS-720.  Note the drives inside are Shugart 800 seriers.  I
>> would think the 800's would be Shugart-compatible if not actually Shugart
>> drives inside.
>> https://www.vintagecomputer.net/intel/MDS-720/Intel_MDS-720_D1-SN.jpg
>> 
>> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 4:11 PM Jonathan Chapman via cctalk <
>> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> All,
>>> 
>>> I recently picked up an ICE-85 in-circuit emulator from Jack Rubin
>>> (thanks Ian and Connor for ferrying it back!). I thought that the stuff it
>>> came with included a Prompt-80 as a controller, but it does not: there's an
>>> unrelated Prompt-48 board in the boxes. The ICE-85 came with ISIS control
>>> software on 8" diskette. So I guess I'm in the market for an Intel MDS-800.
>>> Good luck, right? :P
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jonathan
>>> 
>> 



Re: intellec MDS80 on eBay

2020-06-02 Thread Mich.com via cctalk



Sent from my iPhone.

> On Jun 2, 2020, at 6:22 PM, dwight via cctalk  wrote:
> 
> I take it back, there are not the typical two card intel disk controller. I 
> don't see what is the controller. I was the ribbon cable but realize now that 
> was the ICE interface.
> I suspect the card near the bottom of the picture is the controller. It 
> likely still had ISIS software to run the ICE boards but it likely wasn't a 
> compatible disk controller. They'd need to write a BIOS for it as I doubt 
> there is any after market disk controllers that match the original Intel 
> boards.
> Dwight
> 

It looks to me like it IS a standard Intel diskette controller board set. It 
has the more unusual cable that was meant for the Series II that was meant to 
upgrade the internal disk drive from single density to double density. See the 
unused edge connector? It has the sticker that came with that upgrade kit that 
says internal drive upgraded to double density on the front of the chassis.

The Intel two-board set is in the photo just below the ICE boards. It is dark 
but you can see there are two boards because of the board ejectors. Follow the 
cable off one of those boards and it goes to that unused edge connector.

On another topic, not in this system, there WAS a third party controller that 
emulated the Intel board set and required no BIOS modification. Zendex was the 
manufacturer. I never used one but it sounded interesting.
It was only one board.

Dave

> 
> From: cctalk  on behalf of dwight via cctalk 
> 
> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 3:15 PM
> To: ED SHARPE ; General Discussion: On-Topic and 
> Off-Topic Posts 
> Subject: Re: intellec MDS80 on eBay
> 
> The drives don't look like a standard box but are likely fine as it has the 
> two card controller on the card cage.
> The drives are still likely SA800s.
> Dwight
> 
> 
> From: cctalk  on behalf of ED SHARPE via 
> cctalk 
> Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2020 9:28 AM
> To: cct...@classiccmp.org 
> Subject: RE: intellec MDS80 on eBay
> 
> 
> I assume this are not the standard Intel floppy drives?
> On Sunday, May 31, 2020 Jan-Benedict Glaw via cctech  cct...@classiccmp.org> wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I just wanted to drop an email that there's a MDS 80 on eBay:
> 
>https://www.ebay.de/itm/333612000595
> 
> (Please note: The seller, Michael, is a friend of mine, and a former
> coworker.)
> 
> Thanks,
>  Jan-Benedict
> 
> --



Re: PC Fortran (Was: Microsoft open sources GWBASIC

2020-05-31 Thread Mich.com via cctalk



Sent from my iPhone.

> On May 31, 2020, at 9:16 PM, Bill Gunshannon  
> wrote:
> 
> On 5/31/20 8:35 PM, Mich.com wrote:
>> Sent from my iPhone.
 On May 31, 2020, at 7:50 PM, Bill Gunshannon via cctalk 
  wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 5/31/20 2:24 AM, Eric Smith via cctalk wrote:
 On the other hand, Intel also had a FORTRAN-80 product, which was unrelated
 to Microsoft FORTRAN-80. Intel FOTRAN-80 ran on their MDS development
 systems under the ISIS-II operating system, and the compiler was written in
 PL/M.
>>> 
>>> Which is even funnier when you realize that the PL/M compiler
>>> was written in Fortran.
>>> 
>>> bill
>> As I recall, it was the cross compiler for PL/M that was written in FORTRAN. 
>> But that came first, before any 8080-hosted PL/M compiler.
> 
> You are definitely right on that. I forget what it was intended to run
> on, probably some minicomputer like a DEC System-10 or -20.  Hmmm...  I
> wonder if it would compile with Fortran-80 on my TRS-80.  That might be
> fun to see.  I even have corrected sources around here somewhere because
> after all those years of people using it I found a few bugs in the two
> sets of sources that were floating around the Internet.  :-)
> 
> bill
> 

I remember the “technical Computer center” people at Chrysler where I worked 
talking about making the PL/M compiler run on our CDC Cyber computers (60-bit). 
It was a bit of work. I seem to remember thinking it was written to run on an 
IBM mainframe, if that makes sense. But they got it working and we used it 
until Intel came out with their 8080-based development systems. Then we started 
using them to compile.

Dave




Re: PC Fortran (Was: Microsoft open sources GWBASIC

2020-05-31 Thread Mich.com via cctalk



Sent from my iPhone.

> On May 31, 2020, at 7:50 PM, Bill Gunshannon via cctalk 
>  wrote:
> 
> On 5/31/20 2:24 AM, Eric Smith via cctalk wrote:
>> On the other hand, Intel also had a FORTRAN-80 product, which was unrelated
>> to Microsoft FORTRAN-80. Intel FOTRAN-80 ran on their MDS development
>> systems under the ISIS-II operating system, and the compiler was written in
>> PL/M.
> 
> Which is even funnier when you realize that the PL/M compiler
> was written in Fortran.
> 
> bill

As I recall, it was the cross compiler for PL/M that was written in FORTRAN. 
But that came first, before any 8080-hosted PL/M compiler.