Re: Linux problems

2007-07-29 Thread Joerg Schilling
Thomas Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Joerg Schilling:
  Alan Cox [...] with his answers to Mr. Bloch, he was correct,
  but I did not see him writing this claim.

 That's what i understand from this statement by Alan Cox 
   http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/31/175

OK, it seems that I forgot about the less important parts.

 I interpret this like:
 Kids, manage this yourself, like the Terminalovski
  brothers from the neighbor house did.

 Well, Dialup Terminalovski is an ageing web criminal now.
 Uucp Terminalovksi lost his job to the Internet.
 Kermit Terminalovski went back to showbiz.

 Do they really want us to end up like that ?!

Well, this kind of rant verifies that he has no clue.

The tty dial in/out problem is unrelated to the SCSI  / removable
media problem.

The tty problem has been solved more than 25 years ago.
There are two devices /dev/ttya  /dev/cua0
The dialout device cua0 is blocked as long as a dial in is active
and the dial in device is blocked as long as a dial out is active.

This is a simple task compared to what cdrecord does on UNIX.
There are only two programs with completely different tasks
for ttys. There are many different taks related to CD/DVD sersives.

 Joerg Schilling:
  If he did really write that it is a Linux userland only problem,
  he is of course wrong.

 This becomes evident by my failure to coordinate
 cdrskin and libblkid. Ted T'so is my witness that i
 did consider any known locking mechanism and that
 each of them failed to match our needs.
 Those needs are not exotic.

Forget usual locking mechanisms, they will all not work.


 I'm open to proposals. (Expect some counter arguments
 from my side but be assured that i hope to lose in
 my role as advocatus diavoli.)

You cannot find a solution for Linux as long as the related people 
are unwilling acept a solution.

As long as Linux implements 3 or more unrelated and unsynchronized paths 
to the same hardware it is impossible to even add the basic support that
works on Solaris sine a long time.

There are issues that are even not solved on Solaris but you cannot
solve them on Linux if the basics are impossible.

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
   [EMAIL PROTECTED](uni)  
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Linux problems

2007-07-29 Thread Seth Kurtzberg
If you are willing to tolerate deadlock, a simple kernel patch suffices.
Such a solution is, surely, ugly, but may be a better alternative than no
solution at all.

-Original Message-
From: Joerg Schilling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 8:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; cdwrite@other.debian.org
Subject: Re: Linux problems

Thomas Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Joerg Schilling:
  Alan Cox [...] with his answers to Mr. Bloch, he was correct,
  but I did not see him writing this claim.

 That's what i understand from this statement by Alan Cox 
   http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/31/175

OK, it seems that I forgot about the less important parts.

 I interpret this like:
 Kids, manage this yourself, like the Terminalovski
  brothers from the neighbor house did.

 Well, Dialup Terminalovski is an ageing web criminal now.
 Uucp Terminalovksi lost his job to the Internet.
 Kermit Terminalovski went back to showbiz.

 Do they really want us to end up like that ?!

Well, this kind of rant verifies that he has no clue.

The tty dial in/out problem is unrelated to the SCSI  / removable
media problem.

The tty problem has been solved more than 25 years ago.
There are two devices /dev/ttya  /dev/cua0
The dialout device cua0 is blocked as long as a dial in is active
and the dial in device is blocked as long as a dial out is active.

This is a simple task compared to what cdrecord does on UNIX.
There are only two programs with completely different tasks
for ttys. There are many different taks related to CD/DVD sersives.

 Joerg Schilling:
  If he did really write that it is a Linux userland only problem,
  he is of course wrong.

 This becomes evident by my failure to coordinate
 cdrskin and libblkid. Ted T'so is my witness that i
 did consider any known locking mechanism and that
 each of them failed to match our needs.
 Those needs are not exotic.

Forget usual locking mechanisms, they will all not work.


 I'm open to proposals. (Expect some counter arguments
 from my side but be assured that i hope to lose in
 my role as advocatus diavoli.)

You cannot find a solution for Linux as long as the related people 
are unwilling acept a solution.

As long as Linux implements 3 or more unrelated and unsynchronized paths 
to the same hardware it is impossible to even add the basic support that
works on Solaris sine a long time.

There are issues that are even not solved on Solaris but you cannot
solve them on Linux if the basics are impossible.

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353
Berlin
   [EMAIL PROTECTED](uni)  
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: Linux problems

2007-07-29 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi,

Seth Kurtzberg:
 If you are willing to tolerate deadlock, a simple kernel patch suffices.
 Such a solution is, surely, ugly, but may be a better alternative than no
 solution at all.

By deadlock you mean that both contestants are denied
access ? Not that anything gets stuck if it wants
non-blocking i/o, i hope.

Such a solution would indeed be an improvement.

But is it beautiful enough to replace the current
behavior in the main stream kernels ?
I.e. can we convince the decisive people to accept
it ?

It would not help much if we had to prescribe
kernel patching before proper burning of CD and
DVD is possible. I myself would frown on that
and rather do what has to be done to make my
/dev/s[gr][0-9]* safe. No automats groping my drives.
Basta.

But the goal of cdrskin is to be installable on
any modern Linux distro. So i can neither demand
people to calm down their autmats nor can i demand
them to create custom kernels.

Nevertheless and anyway:
What does this patch do ?
Is it explainable to userland programmers ?


Have a nice day :)

Thomas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: cdrecord problems

2007-07-29 Thread Bill Davidsen

Joerg Schilling wrote:

Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  

Paragraph 4.3.7 DVD+R Dual Layer is much more detailed
about the layer hop. Nevertheless there is a statement
which makes me believe it is worth a try to just write
to it as to a fat DVD+R.
  
  
That seems to work. I did some backups that way, creating big files and 
just burning them. I believe I used growisofs but I can't be sure after 
the fact. Reading the data back produced no read errors and a correct 
md5sum, I did wipe the original and test restore, though. ;-)



As you don't know what you did, it is a good idea not to believe you...

Not setting the layer break on DVD+R/DL may work in principle but it causes a 
lot of headaches. If you do not set the layer break, you need to write both

complete surfaces.
  
Of course! That is exactly what I said I did, I wrote the data to a big 
file, ~8.2GB, then burned.


As for both complete surfaces, the last volume was only 6.7GB or so, and 
read back fine. So having to write an image covering both complete 
surfaces (what you said) doesn't seem required.. Did you ever try just 
writing an 8GB image to a DL, without specifying the layer break, to see 
what it does? Or is that a requirement of your software and not 
growisofs and the enhanced cdrecord which Fedora provides?


--
bill davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 CTO TMR Associates, Inc
 Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Linux problems

2007-07-29 Thread Bill Davidsen

Joerg Schilling wrote:


The tty dial in/out problem is unrelated to the SCSI  / removable
media problem.

The tty problem has been solved more than 25 years ago.
There are two devices /dev/ttya  /dev/cua0
The dialout device cua0 is blocked as long as a dial in is active
and the dial in device is blocked as long as a dial out is active.

This is a simple task compared to what cdrecord does on UNIX.
There are only two programs with completely different tasks
for ttys. There are many different taks related to CD/DVD sersives.

  
Two? Which two of getty, ppp, slip, uucico/uucp, kermit, X10power, and 
nut? Not to mention the getty+ alternatives which include fax and voice 
mail. You were right saying the problem was solved, but your count of 
applications is low.
NOTE: nut is one of the serial applications which monitor a UPS, there 
are others.


If a good solution is available, applications will change to use the 
solution.


--
bill davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 CTO TMR Associates, Inc
 Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: cdrecord problems

2007-07-29 Thread Joerg Schilling
Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 As for both complete surfaces, the last volume was only 6.7GB or so, and 
 read back fine. So having to write an image covering both complete 
 surfaces (what you said) doesn't seem required.. Did you ever try just 
 writing an 8GB image to a DL, without specifying the layer break, to see 
 what it does? Or is that a requirement of your software and not 
 growisofs and the enhanced cdrecord which Fedora provides?

? You seem to be missinformed again. Fedora does not provide an
enhanced cdrecord. 

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
   [EMAIL PROTECTED](uni)  
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Linux problems

2007-07-29 Thread Joerg Schilling
Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Joerg Schilling wrote:
 
  The tty dial in/out problem is unrelated to the SCSI  / removable
  media problem.
 
  The tty problem has been solved more than 25 years ago.
  There are two devices /dev/ttya  /dev/cua0
  The dialout device cua0 is blocked as long as a dial in is active
  and the dial in device is blocked as long as a dial out is active.
 
  This is a simple task compared to what cdrecord does on UNIX.
  There are only two programs with completely different tasks
  for ttys. There are many different taks related to CD/DVD sersives.
 

 Two? Which two of getty, ppp, slip, uucico/uucp, kermit, X10power, and 
 nut? Not to mention the getty+ alternatives which include fax and voice 
 mail. You were right saying the problem was solved, but your count of 
 applications is low.

Your claims are not related to the Linux removable media problems.

Why do you try to start an off-topic discussion?

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
   [EMAIL PROTECTED](uni)  
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: cdrecord problems

2007-07-29 Thread Bill Davidsen

Thomas Schmitt wrote:

Hi,

Bill Davidsen:
  

I did recently discover that it [cdrskin] has limitations
doing odd raw burns, but that's not a usual requirement,



Would it be indiscrete to ask for the use case and what
cdrecord write mode option you wanted to apply ?

  
Not in the least, I was trying a vcd creation program which said I 
should burn the output file with -raw so I did.



libburn contains code for raw write modes and i implemented
in cdrskin option -raw96r without knowing much of the
technical background. 

  
If you think that will work better I will be glad to try it, burning 
with -raw and cdrecord worked but the media doesn't play, so I presume 
something else is amiss.


I'm just trying to take a bunch of clips and make a how to do it vcd 
from them, so I can give it to people with questions. I've about given 
up on doing it in Linux, and I ship stuff to a Windows user providing a 
clip and a title for each, and she has a program which actually can 
write a usable media providing nothing but the clip name, clip title, 
and title for the menu.


The programs I find either don't work, assume you know whuch obscure 
formats to use, require writing of large xml programs, or have no 
documentation beyond works just like {Windows prog}. At this point I 
have decided there is no simple program in Linux, there is in Windows, 
and I just won't mention the subject when talking about how great Linux 
apps are.  ;-)



But to my experience this mode is unappealing for data
recording although it allows higher throughput and
capacity:
- The time sharing granularity of my system becomes awful,
  
Yes, even with a tuned cfs scheduler. If you run 2.6.22 or later I can 
suggest some tuning values which might help.

- one of my drives can become totally unusable afterwards,
  
That happened with cdrecord as well, so I wasn't sure if it was hardware 
or software. It'not your software alone.

- the higher capacity is at expense of less error detection
  and correction.
  

Not an issue here, I suspect.

Nevertheless, if you give me hints about what and why then
i would begin and try to learn about subchannels and all.
  
How about if I just try a burn with raw96r and see if that works? As in 
successfully writes a vcd my DVD player won't play? I'll let you know, 
the system is sitting on a chair right now, I needed space in a bay for 
another machine, so the test box is out until late tonight, or Tuesday 
if I don't get time today.


--
bill davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 CTO TMR Associates, Inc
 Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: cdrecord problems

2007-07-29 Thread Joerg Schilling
Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Thomas Schmitt wrote:
  Hi,
 
  Bill Davidsen:

  I did recently discover that it [cdrskin] has limitations
  doing odd raw burns, but that's not a usual requirement,
  
 
  Would it be indiscrete to ask for the use case and what
  cdrecord write mode option you wanted to apply ?
 

 Not in the least, I was trying a vcd creation program which said I 
 should burn the output file with -raw so I did.

  libburn contains code for raw write modes and i implemented
  in cdrskin option -raw96r without knowing much of the
  technical background. 
 

 If you think that will work better I will be glad to try it, burning 
 with -raw and cdrecord worked but the media doesn't play, so I presume 
 something else is amiss.

If you used the official cdrecord and not a bastardized clone, it only
depends on the data you give to cdredord.

svcds need to be written with cue=

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
   [EMAIL PROTECTED](uni)  
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: cdrecord problems

2007-07-29 Thread Joerg Schilling
Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Joerg Schilling wrote:
  Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 

 http://www.arklinux.org/projects/dvdrtools/
 
 This page is temporarily down because of spammer attacks; until it
 comes back, you can download dvdrtools from svn ...
 
  Now who would do a thing like that?


  Who can understand the anti-social mind anyway?
  
 
  It looks a bit strange that the first person who did abuse the cdrtools
  code for his anti-social games, tries to hide behind alleged net
  attacks. In special as it is obvious that he himself did only remove _all_
  dvdrtools related pages from his webserver while other pages remained 
  accessible. I would be interested to know why he did this surprisingly at 
  the 
  same time when other people started another speudo-fork on cdrtools.
  These other people did start another anti-social game against OSS users.
 

 Why are you making this vague claim of wrong doing with my name on it? 
 If you are accusing me of something, have the balls to come out and say 

If you do not read a text, you should not send a reply.

Instead of sending childish personal offenses against me, read the text
and try to understand it.



Jörg

-- 
 EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
   [EMAIL PROTECTED](uni)  
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: cdrecord problems

2007-07-29 Thread Bill Davidsen

Joerg Schilling wrote:

Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  

   http://www.arklinux.org/projects/dvdrtools/

   This page is temporarily down because of spammer attacks; until it
   comes back, you can download dvdrtools from svn ...

Now who would do a thing like that?
  
  

Who can understand the anti-social mind anyway?



It looks a bit strange that the first person who did abuse the cdrtools
code for his anti-social games, tries to hide behind alleged net
attacks. In special as it is obvious that he himself did only remove _all_
dvdrtools related pages from his webserver while other pages remained 
accessible. I would be interested to know why he did this surprisingly at the 
same time when other people started another speudo-fork on cdrtools.

These other people did start another anti-social game against OSS users.

  
Why are you making this vague claim of wrong doing with my name on it? 
If you are accusing me of something, have the balls to come out and say 
it!  And if you're talking about someone else, why did you leave my name 
on on this swill, instead of naming the person accused? You certainly 
deleted the names of all the other involved posters, and some of their 
email addresses from the post as well!


Or are you afraid that if you actually say something instead of mumbling 
vague innuendo people will tell you you're full of crap? Petty 
backbiting whining, like a sniveling 13 year-old.


--
Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked.  - from Slashdot


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: VCD (was: cdrecord problems)

2007-07-29 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi,

 How about if I just try a burn with raw96r and see if that works?

Worth a try. But man cdrecord says:
 -raw   Set RAW writing mode.  Using this  option  defaults
 to  -raw96r
So probably you cannot expect better results than with
cdrecord -raw.

During my adventures in google i found this
  http://www.os2world.com/cdwriting/vcdtools/readme.htm
  http://packages.debian.org/stable/otherosfs/vcdtools
It uses cdrdao for the job of burning. 
Looks like the author already went through the adventures
which libburn would have to pass in order to get VCD ready.


What i could learn about VCD within an hour:

Google hit #1 for VCD lets me believe that
it needs some deep knowledge in and beyond MMC
  http://www.videohelp.com/vcd

One mode 2 mixed form ISO-9660 track containing file
 pointers to the information areas.
 Up to 98 multiplex-ed mpeg-1 audio/video streams or
 cd-da audio tracks.


This contains several keywords to be explored in MMC
and in man cdrecord.

Then i read
  http://www.geocities.com/athens/forum/2496/vcdfaq.html
and get to
  http://www.mplayerhq.hu/DOCS/HTML/en/vcd.html
where i read the usual statement:
The definition of the Video CD standard is called the
 Philips White Book and it is not generally available
 online as it must be purchased from Philips. 

But also:
The first track is in mode 2 form 2 format which means
 it uses L2 error correction. The track contains an ISO-9660
 filesystem with 2048 bytes/sector.
Somehow i can not recognize in MMC specs mode 2 form 2 
with 2048 bytes/sector. 2048 is associated with form 1.
man cdrecord brings me to the idea to try -xa. That would
match the plan to write further tracks.
The second and remaining tracks are generally raw 2324
 bytes/sector MPEG [...] These are in mode 2 form 1 format
Within man cdrecord only -xa2 promises 2324 bytes/sector.
I assume the mplayer FAQ confuses form 1 and form 2.

I see not much chance with current cdrskin. If you get
cdrecord to work for you, tell me which options are actually
needed.


Have a nice day :)

Thomas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: VCD (was: cdrecord problems)

2007-07-29 Thread Joerg Schilling
Thomas Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,

  How about if I just try a burn with raw96r and see if that works?

 Worth a try. But man cdrecord says:
  -raw   Set RAW writing mode.  Using this  option  defaults
  to  -raw96r
 So probably you cannot expect better results than with
 cdrecord -raw.

 During my adventures in google i found this
   http://www.os2world.com/cdwriting/vcdtools/readme.htm
   http://packages.debian.org/stable/otherosfs/vcdtools
 It uses cdrdao for the job of burning. 
 Looks like the author already went through the adventures
 which libburn would have to pass in order to get VCD ready.

You need the right kind of data for a vcd.

The data from vcd formatters usually contains preformatted sectors and 
a cue sheet file.

Writing a vcd should be possible with cdrdao (using SAO mode). 

Writing a svcd unly works with cdrdao if you can write it in SAO mode
and if your writer supports to write complex data in SAO mode.

If you need to write a svcd in RAW mode (e.g. because you use a Pioneer drive)
you are lost with cdrdao and need to use cdrecord. Cdrdao does not handle
cue sheet file based writing in RAW mode correctly.

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
   [EMAIL PROTECTED](uni)  
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: VCD

2007-07-29 Thread Rob Bogus

Joerg Schilling wrote:

Thomas Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  

Hi,



How about if I just try a burn with raw96r and see if that works?
  

Worth a try. But man cdrecord says:
 -raw   Set RAW writing mode.  Using this  option  defaults
 to  -raw96r
So probably you cannot expect better results than with
cdrecord -raw.

During my adventures in google i found this
  http://www.os2world.com/cdwriting/vcdtools/readme.htm
  http://packages.debian.org/stable/otherosfs/vcdtools
It uses cdrdao for the job of burning. 
Looks like the author already went through the adventures

which libburn would have to pass in order to get VCD ready.



You need the right kind of data for a vcd.

The data from vcd formatters usually contains preformatted sectors and 
a cue sheet file.


Writing a vcd should be possible with cdrdao (using SAO mode). 


Writing a svcd unly works with cdrdao if you can write it in SAO mode
and if your writer supports to write complex data in SAO mode.

If you need to write a svcd in RAW mode (e.g. because you use a Pioneer drive)
you are lost with cdrdao and need to use cdrecord. Cdrdao does not handle
cue sheet file based writing in RAW mode correctly.
  


One of the options is to create an image with 2336 (mode2) sector 
layout. Unfortunately I can't find information on what size it uses by 
default. Bah!


--
E. Robert Bogusta
 It seemed like a good idea at the time


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: VCD

2007-07-29 Thread Bill Davidsen

Rob Bogus wrote:

No he didn't, I was working on the rack next to Robbie's machine, and 
unlocked the screen to read the list. Then I replied as him. My bad, any 
disagreement with what I wrote under his name should fall on me.



Joerg Schilling wrote:


You need the right kind of data for a vcd.

The data from vcd formatters usually contains preformatted sectors 
and a cue sheet file.


Writing a vcd should be possible with cdrdao (using SAO mode).
Writing a svcd unly works with cdrdao if you can write it in SAO mode
and if your writer supports to write complex data in SAO mode.

If you need to write a svcd in RAW mode (e.g. because you use a 
Pioneer drive)
you are lost with cdrdao and need to use cdrecord. Cdrdao does not 
handle

cue sheet file based writing in RAW mode correctly.
  


One of the options is to create an image with 2336 (mode2) sector 
layout. Unfortunately I can't find information on what size it uses by 
default. Bah!



But I do see that option.

--
Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked.  - from Slashdot


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]