Re: cdrtools 2.01.01a73: untaring the archive could not create some hardlinks
Marcus Roeckrath wrote: > Hallo Joerg, > > Am Montag, 25. Januar 2010 15:09 schrieb Joerg Schilling: > > > > on untaring the cdrtools source archive I got some errors when tar > > > wasn't able to create some harddlinks. > > > > What OS and what tar? > > Eisfair-Server-Projekt; Kernel 2.4.35 > > On earlier releases of cdrtools including a72 I never had the problem. > > I unpacked the cdrtools source twice: once using direct tar command and the > second time using mc which I also used yesterday. > > The error messages occured using mc. "mc" is known to include a very buggy tar implementation - don't use it. > Now I compared the unpacked source trees with diff > (cdrtools/cdrtools-2.01.01 unpacked with mc the other unpacked with tar > commandline): > > These are the differences: > > eis # diff -r cdrtools/cdrtools-2.01.01/ cdrtools-2.01.01 > > File cdrtools/cdrtools-2.01.01/TARGETS/44libs...@!scg is a regular file > while file cdrtools-2.01.01/TARGETS/44libs...@!scg is a directory Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni) joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to cdwrite-requ...@other.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@other.debian.org
Re: cdrtools 2.01.01a73: untaring the archive could not create some hardlinks
Hallo Joerg, Am Montag, 25. Januar 2010 15:09 schrieb Joerg Schilling: > > on untaring the cdrtools source archive I got some errors when tar > > wasn't able to create some harddlinks. > > What OS and what tar? Eisfair-Server-Projekt; Kernel 2.4.35 On earlier releases of cdrtools including a72 I never had the problem. I unpacked the cdrtools source twice: once using direct tar command and the second time using mc which I also used yesterday. The error messages occured using mc. Now I compared the unpacked source trees with diff (cdrtools/cdrtools-2.01.01 unpacked with mc the other unpacked with tar commandline): These are the differences: eis # diff -r cdrtools/cdrtools-2.01.01/ cdrtools-2.01.01 File cdrtools/cdrtools-2.01.01/TARGETS/44libs...@!scg is a regular file while file cdrtools-2.01.01/TARGETS/44libs...@!scg is a directory File cdrtools/cdrtools-2.01.01/TARGETS/45libsico...@!tables is a regular file while file cdrtools-2.01.01/TARGETS/45libsico...@!tables is a directory File cdrtools/cdrtools-2.01.01/TARGETS/55mkiso...@!diag is a regular file whilefile cdrtools-2.01.01/TARGETS/55mkiso...@!diag is a directory File cdrtools/cdrtools-2.01.01/cdrecord/readme.di...@2 is a regular file while file cdrtools-2.01.01/cdrecord/readme.di...@2 is a directory File cdrtools/cdrtools-2.01.01/make_di...@2.sh is a regular file while file cdrtools-2.01.01/make_di...@2.sh is a directory eis # tar --version tar (GNU tar) 1.17 -- Gruss Marcus Marcus Roeckrath -- Vikarsbusch 8 -- D-48308 Senden -- Germany Phone : +49-2536-9944 -- Fax : +49-2536-9943 E-Mail : marcus.roeckr...@gmx.de WWW: http://home.foni.net/~marcusroeckrath/ pgpdg9LqXGuAb.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: GNU isofsmk (was: Re: Announcing mkisofs 1.13)
Robert Millan wrote: > On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 12:09:50AM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > If you really like to take the outdated mkisofs and play with it, I urge > > you not to use the name "mkisofs" for this > > Next release will be renamed to GNU isofsmk to make sure users won't get > confused. You still confuse people by publishing a file called "mkisofs-1.13.tar.gz" that does not match the checksum from the original at: ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/mkisofs/old/mkisofs-1.13.tar.gz Please remove this file from ftp.gnu.org. > > Note that your tar archive contains a file "NEWS" that makes incorrect > > claims: > > > > - The software you published does not support files >= 4 GB > > > > The original mkisofs supports files > 4 GB (implemented by me) > > since 3.5 years. > > This claim isn't incorrect, but perhaps isn't clear enough: It refers to a > limit in the size of the filesystem image itself, rather than its content. Mkisofs supports large files for the file system image since 9 years. Claiming that you added this now does not look like a valid statement. Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni) joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to cdwrite-requ...@other.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@other.debian.org
Re: cdrtools 2.01.01a73: untaring the archive could not create some hardlinks
Marcus Roeckrath wrote: > on untaring the cdrtools source archive I got some errors when tar wasn't > able to create some harddlinks. What OS and what tar? GNU tar sometimes has problems with tar archves, I recommend star ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/star/ > But cdrtools compiles fine. OK Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni) joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to cdwrite-requ...@other.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@other.debian.org
cdrtools 2.01.01a73: untaring the archive could not create some hardlinks
Hi, on untaring the cdrtools source archive I got some errors when tar wasn't able to create some harddlinks. But cdrtools compiles fine. -- Gruss Marcus Marcus Roeckrath -- Vikarsbusch 8 -- D-48308 Senden -- Germany Phone : +49-2536-9944 -- Fax : +49-2536-9943 E-Mail : marcus.roeckr...@gmx.de WWW: http://home.foni.net/~marcusroeckrath/ pgpzGB89re6sT.pgp Description: PGP signature
