[CentOS-es] Fwd: Adept o Kpackage en CentOS
Hola!!! Lo mismo me ocurre para el programa athcool, y el portatil se empieza a calentar jajajaja. -- Forwarded message -- From: Pedro Jose [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 18:08:29 +0200 Subject: Adept o Kpackage en CentOS To: centos-es@centos.org Hola: Me gustaría saber qué repositorios tengo que instalar para poder instalar estos paquetes, puesto que con los que vienen por defecto en CentOS5 no los encuentra: ejecuto yum search adept y no encuentra nada, y lo mismo para kpackage. -- Saludos, Pedro -- Saludos, Pedro ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Fwd: Adept o Kpackage en CentOS
hola, solo tienes que instalar el repo de rpmforge y ejecutar el yum install entonces. Aquí está el cómo instalar ese repo, ten en cuenta que tienes que instalar y bajar el paquete para centos5 (en el documento lo explico para centos4): http://www.ecualug.org/?q=2006/03/30/comos/centos/c_mo_usar_el_repositorio_de_dag_en_nuestro_centos saludos epe Pedro Jose wrote: Hola!!! Lo mismo me ocurre para el programa athcool, y el portatil se empieza a calentar jajajaja. -- Forwarded message -- From: Pedro Jose [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 18:08:29 +0200 Subject: Adept o Kpackage en CentOS To: centos-es@centos.org Hola: Me gustaría saber qué repositorios tengo que instalar para poder instalar estos paquetes, puesto que con los que vienen por defecto en CentOS5 no los encuentra: ejecuto yum search adept y no encuentra nada, y lo mismo para kpackage. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] como usar mdadm ????
Estoy tratando de configurar RAID 1 con mdadm. He estado tratando de hacerlo y puedo entender que debo modificar el archivo /etc/mdadm.conf y ejecutar mdadm. Pero me salen errores que no entiendo. Alguien me puede ayudar para saber que debo poner en el archivo mdadm.conf y que parametros ponerle a mdadm segun lo que al final me muestra un fdisk -l (tengo 2 discos uno particionado ya y el otro vacio sin particionar) Gracias -- -- Disk /dev/sda: 80.0 GB, 80026361856 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 9729 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 14900072188077+ 83 Linux /dev/sda290019729 5855692+ 82 Linux swap / Solaris /dev/sda3 * 1 13 104391 83 Linux Partition table entries are not in disk order Disk /dev/sdb: 80.0 GB, 80026361856 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 9729 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] Legacy-free FADT Detected, But FADT size (129) is incorrect.
Saludos Tengo el siguiente error al iniciar un centos 4 BIOS bug:Legacy-free FADT Detected, But FADT size (129) is incorrect. Se queda ahi y no inicia. Gracias al que me pueda guiar con este problema At. Luis Molina _ Descubre la descarga digital con MSN Music. Más de un millón de canciones. http://music.msn.es/ ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] como usar mdadm ????
Debo crear los mismos 3 device que ya ves en mi correo y en el otro disco igual , solo que de tipo fd.? En el punto 4 , en mi caso seria algo asi: mdadm --create /dev/md0 --verbose --level=1 --raid-devices=2 /dev/sda1 /dev/sda2 /dev/sda3 La verdad que como recien empiezo en esto de linux tengo algunas dudas. Por anticipado gracias. El día 9/07/07, Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Richard Lopez wrote: Estoy tratando de configurar RAID 1 con mdadm. aqui puse un howto un poco más completo: http://www.ecualug.org/?q=2007/jul/09/comos/c_mo_crear_un_raid_en_un_centos_ya_instalado saludos epe ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] como usar mdadm ????
--- Richard Lopez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Debo crear los mismos 3 device que ya ves en mi correo y en el otro disco igual , solo que de tipo fd.? En el punto 4 , en mi caso seria algo asi: mdadm --create /dev/md0 --verbose --level=1 --raid-devices=2 dices que son dos dispositivos pero ... /dev/sda1 /dev/sda2 /dev/sda3 defines 3 !!! y ademas, del mismo disco (sda) seguro que sabes lo que quieres hacer? sabes lo que es un RAID y para que se usa? cu roger __ RedHat Certified ( RHCE ) Cisco Certified ( CCNA CCDA ) Get your own web address. Have a HUGE year through Yahoo! Small Business. http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/domains/?p=BESTDEAL ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] como usar mdadm ????
Richard Lopez wrote: Debo crear los mismos 3 device que ya ves en mi correo y en el otro disco igual , solo que de tipo fd.? En el punto 4 , en mi caso seria algo asi: mdadm --create /dev/md0 --verbose --level=1 --raid-devices=2 /dev/sda1 /dev/sda2 /dev/sda3 La verdad que como recien empiezo en esto de linux tengo algunas dudas. Por anticipado gracias. Tomalo con calma, armar un raid no es dificil pero para un novatopuede serlo. yo creo que estás confundido. sda1 sda2 y sda3 formarán parte del mismo raid? yo creo que no. el RAID se arma con al menos dos discos. deberías tener un sdb entonces hacer sda1 igual a sdb1, sda2 igual a sdb2 y sda3 igual a sdb3 entonces por parejas ir armando raids: - /dev/md0 estaría compuesto por sda1 y sdb1 - /dev/md1 estaría compuesto por sda2 y sdb2 y así. pero creo que lo que tu quieres es tener linux completo con instalación y todo en un raid, te sugiero que instales tu centos y a la hoar de particionar escoger RAID. Sino muy diuficil que te funcione saludos epe ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Legacy-free FADT Detected, But FADT size (129) is incorrect.
El Mon, 09 Jul 2007 18:52:30 + LUIS MOLINA [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Saludos Tengo el siguiente error al iniciar un centos 4 BIOS bug:Legacy-free FADT Detected, But FADT size (129) is incorrect. Se queda ahi y no inicia. Gracias al que me pueda guiar con este problema FADT es 'Fixed ACPI Description Table'. Por lo que parece, el ACPI de tu BIOS no es todo lo 'católico' que se espera. Puedes probar con una actualización de la BIOS de tu máquina o desactivar el ACPI en tu BIOS para probar. Saludos Ignasi Cavero ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS] kernels with cifs backport (Was: where is smbmount on centOS 5)
On 6/29/07, Wojtek.Pilorz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fedora6, I have noted the folowing problems when using cifs to connect to NT shares: - cp -vip does not copy mtime; tar x does copy mtime (it seems setting modtime by fname does work, setting by handle does not) - when there is a share mounted from a NT/2000 server which is not used for long time mounting another share from the same servers reliably fails ; touching the already mounted share (ls is OK) allows the mount so succeed. - when using vim to edit a file on the share and trying to write it, vim often says that the file has been modified in the meantime - perhaps most annoying: somtimes modifying a file located on NT 4 Workstation share with vim, it becomes permanently unavailable until NT is rebooted. It happens rarely, I do not know how to trigger it on demand. Those problems did not happen when using smbfs from CentOS 4.4. I am wondering if CentOS 5 has these problems? Anyone using cifs from CentOS 5 to access NT-exported share, would care to comment? Here is the updated info. Steve French (samba team) made available a newer cifs version (1.48) backported to old kernels: http://lists.samba.org/archive/linux-cifs-client/2007-April/001898.html Using this cifs code Jeff Layton (RH) has built some test kernels after making appropriate adjustment for RHEL: http://people.redhat.com/jlayton/ You can try the test kernel to see if the problems have been fixed, or if you would rather not use any test kernel, you can just get the cifs module compiled. I have compiled a x86_64 version of cifs for CentOS 5 for my own use and confirmed it has eliminated the bug that causes system crashes in kernel 2.6.18 (C5's default). Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xB887
Seems to be related to the sata ports that you dont have drives connected to :- ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xB880 ctl 0xB802 bmdma 0xB080 irq 66 ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xB480 ctl 0xB402 bmdma 0xB088 irq 66 scsi2 : sata_nv ata3: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xB887 scsi3 : sata_nv ata4: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xB487 If it was the ports that you have drives on then I would be more worried ... Regards Lance -- uklinux.net - The ISP of choice for the discerning Linux user. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DTLS for Centos?
I see DTLS being part of OpenSSL 0.9.8: http://crypto.stanford.edu/~nagendra/projects/dtls/dtls.html Which is the version of OpenSSL in Centos 5. But a yum [search|list] dtls comes up empty. Is it 'in there'? Robert Moskowitz wrote: Is DTLS available for Centos? Either Centos 4 or 5. DTLS is TLS over UDP. Highly valued to protect SIP traffic. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DTLS for Centos?
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 08:09 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I see DTLS being part of OpenSSL 0.9.8: http://crypto.stanford.edu/~nagendra/projects/dtls/dtls.html Which is the version of OpenSSL in Centos 5. But a yum [search|list] dtls comes up empty. Is it 'in there'? [EMAIL PROTECTED] bmcclure]# yum whatprovides dtls Loading protectbase plugin Loading installonlyn plugin Loading fastestmirror plugin Setting up repositories base 100% |=| 1.1 kB 00:00 updates 100% |=| 951 B 00:00 addons100% |=| 951 B 00:00 extras100% |=| 1.1 kB 00:00 Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile Reading repository metadata in from local files 0 packages excluded due to repository protections Importing additional filelist information filelists.xml.gz 100% |=| 3.0 MB 00:32 base : ## 3047/3047 Added 3047 new packages, deleted 0 old in 15.57 seconds filelists.xml.gz 100% |=| 1.2 MB 00:07 updates : ## 552/552 Added 552 new packages, deleted 0 old in 7.60 seconds filelists.xml.gz 100% |=| 150 B 00:00 Added 0 new packages, deleted 0 old in 0.01 seconds filelists.xml.gz 100% |=| 56 kB 00:00 extras: ## 128/128 Added 128 new packages, deleted 0 old in 0.61 seconds openssl-devel.x86_64 0.9.8b-8.3.el5 base Matched from: Robert Moskowitz wrote: Is DTLS available for Centos? Either Centos 4 or 5. DTLS is TLS over UDP. Highly valued to protect SIP traffic. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos CentOS 5.0, Linux 2.6.18-8.1.6.el5 x86_64 07:19:51 up 14:06, 2 users, load average: 0.17, 0.17, 0.08 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xB887
Lance Davis wrote: Seems to be related to the sata ports that you dont have drives connected to :- ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xB880 ctl 0xB802 bmdma 0xB080 irq 66 ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xB480 ctl 0xB402 bmdma 0xB088 irq 66 scsi2 : sata_nv ata3: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xB887 scsi3 : sata_nv ata4: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xB487 If it was the ports that you have drives on then I would be more worried ... Ah, I see ;-) thanks for pointing that out Lance! -- Andrew Hearn ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DTLS for Centos?
B.J. McClure wrote: On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 08:09 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I see DTLS being part of OpenSSL 0.9.8: http://crypto.stanford.edu/~nagendra/projects/dtls/dtls.html Which is the version of OpenSSL in Centos 5. But a yum [search|list] dtls comes up empty. Is it 'in there'? [EMAIL PROTECTED] bmcclure]# yum whatprovides dtls OH, that is the command.. yum whatprovides dtls openssl-devel.i386 0.9.8b-8.3.el5 base Matched from: /usr/include/openssl/dtls1.h thanks. Trixbox 2.4 (beta avail early sept) will be built on Centos 5... Loading protectbase plugin Loading installonlyn plugin Loading fastestmirror plugin Setting up repositories base 100% |=| 1.1 kB 00:00 updates 100% |=| 951 B 00:00 addons100% |=| 951 B 00:00 extras100% |=| 1.1 kB 00:00 Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile Reading repository metadata in from local files 0 packages excluded due to repository protections Importing additional filelist information filelists.xml.gz 100% |=| 3.0 MB 00:32 base : ## 3047/3047 Added 3047 new packages, deleted 0 old in 15.57 seconds filelists.xml.gz 100% |=| 1.2 MB 00:07 updates : ## 552/552 Added 552 new packages, deleted 0 old in 7.60 seconds filelists.xml.gz 100% |=| 150 B 00:00 Added 0 new packages, deleted 0 old in 0.01 seconds filelists.xml.gz 100% |=| 56 kB 00:00 extras: ## 128/128 Added 128 new packages, deleted 0 old in 0.61 seconds openssl-devel.x86_64 0.9.8b-8.3.el5 base Matched from: Robert Moskowitz wrote: Is DTLS available for Centos? Either Centos 4 or 5. DTLS is TLS over UDP. Highly valued to protect SIP traffic. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos CentOS 5.0, Linux 2.6.18-8.1.6.el5 x86_64 07:19:51 up 14:06, 2 users, load average: 0.17, 0.17, 0.08 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Sparc
Debian 4 supports sparc well, has done so for a long time...biggest problem is having to netboot the installer, since most sparc boxes won't get past the initial loader stages booting the kernel, it's some known SILO issue thats been going on for a while. Most distro's seems to falter after an initial release on sparc...and quickly drop the platform. On 7/7/07, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: By chance, has there been any progress on a 5.0 version for an Ultra Sparc? -- Best regards, Chris Registerd Linux user number 448639 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Adam Breaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Sparc
Akemi Yagi wrote: On 7/9/07, Adam Breaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/7/07, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: By chance, has there been any progress on a 5.0 version for an Ultra Sparc? Debian 4 supports sparc well, has done so for a long time...biggest problem is having to netboot the installer, since most sparc boxes won't get past the initial loader stages booting the kernel, it's some known SILO issue thats been going on for a while. Most distro's seems to falter after an initial release on sparc...and quickly drop the platform. aurora sparc linux seems to be still actively developed. I used it a few years ago and it wasn't bad at all. Every time I feel like I have the time/energy to install Linux on an old Sparc box, I consider how much energy they use and how (relative to a modern PC) slow they now seem. Pretty amazing when you consider that the E450 that you'd now use to hold down paper once cost more than a luxury car. :) Best, ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: kernels with cifs backport (Was: where is smbmount on centOS 5)
On 7/8/07, Akemi Yagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is the updated info. Steve French (samba team) made available a newer cifs version (1.48) backported to old kernels: http://lists.samba.org/archive/linux-cifs-client/2007-April/001898.html Using this cifs code Jeff Layton (RH) has built some test kernels after making appropriate adjustment for RHEL: http://people.redhat.com/jlayton/ FYI. A list of cifs bugs fixed in the above version (going from 1.45 to 1.48): +Verison 1.48 + +Fix mtime bouncing around from local idea of last write times to remote time. +Fix hang (in i_size_read) when simultaneous size update of same remote file +on smp system corrupts sequence number. Do not reread unnecessarily partial page +(which we are about to overwrite anyway) when writing out file opened rw. +When DOS attribute of file on non-Unix server's file changes on the server side +from read-only back to read-write, reflect this change in default file mode +(we had been leaving a file's mode read-only until the inode were reloaded). +Allow setting of attribute back to ATTR_NORMAL (removing readonly dos attribute +when archive dos attribute not set and we are changing mode back to writeable +on server which does not support the Unix Extensions). + +Version 1.47 + +Fix oops in list_del during mount caused by unaligned string. +Fix file corruption which could occur on some large file +copies caused by writepages page i/o completion bug. +Seek to SEEK_END forces check for update of file size for non-cached +files. + +Version 1.46 + +Support deep tree mounts. Better support OS/2, Win9x (DOS) time stamps. +Allow null user to be specified on mount (username=). Do not return +EINVAL on readdir when filldir fails due to overwritten blocksize +(fixes FC problem). Return error in rename 2nd attempt retry (ie report +if rename by handle also fails, after rename by path fails, we were +not reporting whether the retry worked or not). Fix NTLMv2 to +work to Windows servers (mount with option sec=ntlmv2). ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum download with erros pertaining libpurple
On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 18:35 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: Gregory P. Ennis wrote: Has anyone else had problems with a recent yum download with libpurple on an X64 machine? whats an X64 machine ? Error: Missing Dependency: libmeanwhile.so.1 is needed by package libpurple libmeanwhile is provided in the repo.. - KB Thank you for your help!!! Sorry about X64 what I really should have written is that the OS is CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD. My thought is that there may be a repository problem in that I have not tried to install anything out of the ordinary other than software related to the repositories I listed. If I try to do a yum install libmeanwhile I get a Nothing to do response from yum. but locate does not find any references to libmeanwhile. If I try to do a yum -y install I get : Error: Missing Dependency: libmeanwhile.so.1 is needed by package libpurple This causes me to think that their may be a dependency problem in the repositories for x86_64 operating systems. Does this sound reasonable or are their other things I might need to do on my end? Greg ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum download with erros pertaining libpurple
Gregory P. Ennis wrote: If I try to do a yum install libmeanwhile I get a Nothing to do response from yum. but locate does not find any references to libmeanwhile. ... If I try to do a yum -y install I get : Error: Missing Dependency: libmeanwhile.so.1 is needed by package libpurple ... This causes me to think that their may be a dependency problem in the repositories for x86_64 operating systems. yes, this is mostly the fallout from bad packaging at redhat's end. what you need to do is perhaps a 'yum clean all; yum --obsoletes update' that should find pidgin and its dep chain. - KB -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum download with erros pertaining libpurple
On 7/9/07, Gregory P. Ennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I try to do a yum -y install I get : Error: Missing Dependency: libmeanwhile.so.1 is needed by package libpurple If you look, you're pulling meanwhile from the rpmforge repo, and the other stuff from the base/updates repos for centos. This causes me to think that their may be a dependency problem in the repositories for x86_64 operating systems. Nope. Mostly you're pulling different versions from different repositories. Does this sound reasonable or are their other things I might need to do on my end? you might try excluding the package from one of the repositories. -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Loss of Prompt Cursor
When I log into a virtual console as ordinary user, I initially have a prompt cursor. After I print 24 lines or more, the last visible (24th) line will be data instead of the prompt cursor. The up arrow no longer gives the previous commands. A clear command will restore the prompt cursor. This bug first appeared after I installed CentOS5. I do not believe it is a CentOS5 bug however because when I boot Ubuntu from a LivePC CDROM, the same thing happens. Any comments/suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks in advance - Bob T. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum download with erros pertaining libpurple
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 12:37 -0400, Jim Perrin wrote: On 7/9/07, Gregory P. Ennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I try to do a yum -y install I get : Error: Missing Dependency: libmeanwhile.so.1 is needed by package libpurple If you look, you're pulling meanwhile from the rpmforge repo, and the other stuff from the base/updates repos for centos. This causes me to think that their may be a dependency problem in the repositories for x86_64 operating systems. Nope. Mostly you're pulling different versions from different repositories. Does this sound reasonable or are their other things I might need to do on my end? you might try excluding the package from one of the repositories. Thanks for your help... and thanks to Karanbir Singh as well. After I did a yum clean all I followed it with a yum --obsoletes update and continued to receive the same error of not finding libmeanwhile. I removed the rpmforge depo and performed another yum clean all followed by yum -y update and everything downloaded without error. Have others had difficulty with rpmforge? Is there a way within yum to keep it active, but to give it a priority as secondary to the normal CentOS repositories? Thanks again for your help Greg ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum download with erros pertaining libpurple
Gregory P. Ennis wrote: On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 12:37 -0400, Jim Perrin wrote: On 7/9/07, Gregory P. Ennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I try to do a yum -y install I get : Error: Missing Dependency: libmeanwhile.so.1 is needed by package libpurple If you look, you're pulling meanwhile from the rpmforge repo, and the other stuff from the base/updates repos for centos. This causes me to think that their may be a dependency problem in the repositories for x86_64 operating systems. Nope. Mostly you're pulling different versions from different repositories. Does this sound reasonable or are their other things I might need to do on my end? you might try excluding the package from one of the repositories. Thanks for your help... and thanks to Karanbir Singh as well. After I did a yum clean all I followed it with a yum --obsoletes update and continued to receive the same error of not finding libmeanwhile. I removed the rpmforge depo and performed another yum clean all followed by yum -y update and everything downloaded without error. Have others had difficulty with rpmforge? Is there a way within yum to keep it active, but to give it a priority as secondary to the normal CentOS repositories? Are you using the yum-fastestmirror and yum-priorities plugins (I highly recommend both)? http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum download with erros pertaining libpurple
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 12:20 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: Are you using the yum-fastestmirror and yum-priorities plugins (I highly recommend both)? I removed RPMforge and these are what is left. Loading skip-broken plugin Loading changelog plugin Loading priorities plugin Loading allowdowngrade plugin Loading fastestmirror plugin Loading downloadonly plugin Loading installonlyn plugin Loading tsflags plugin Loading protectbase plugin Loading fedorakmod plugin Loading kernel-module plugin Does the priorities plugin give the CentOS repositories priority over RPMforge? Greg ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum download with erros pertaining libpurple
Gregory P. Ennis wrote: On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 12:20 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: Are you using the yum-fastestmirror and yum-priorities plugins (I highly recommend both)? I removed RPMforge and these are what is left. Loading skip-broken plugin Loading changelog plugin Loading priorities plugin Loading allowdowngrade plugin Loading fastestmirror plugin Loading downloadonly plugin Loading installonlyn plugin Loading tsflags plugin Loading protectbase plugin Loading fedorakmod plugin Loading kernel-module plugin Does the priorities plugin give the CentOS repositories priority over RPMforge? Yes it does (when configured) See: http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities (You probably don't need all those plugins ... and you do nt want both protectbase and priorities installed at the same time) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Firefox and CPU spikes?
Is it just me, or does anyone else experience their CPU utilization spiking to 100% for about 5 to 10 seconds when Firefox is about to download a file, via http or ftp? Then, after the file starts to download, the CPU usage drops back down to normal. I've got Firefox 2.0.0.4 running on CentOS 4.4 32-bit. Thanks. Scott ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firefox and CPU spikes?
Scott Ehrlich wrote: Is it just me, or does anyone else experience their CPU utilization spiking to 100% for about 5 to 10 seconds when Firefox is about to download a file, via http or ftp? Then, after the file starts to download, the CPU usage drops back down to normal. I've got Firefox 2.0.0.4 running on CentOS 4.4 32-bit. Thanks. Scott ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi Scott, I experience the same behavior in FF on Windows and Linux. In fact, the same was with FF 1.5/Win if I recall. I'm running 1.5 on my CentOS 5 box now with no issues, but the same 'first load' or 'download' CPU spike. Hope this helps. Regards, ~Ray ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Loss of Prompt Cursor
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Thompson Sent: Tuesday, 10 July 2007 5:06 a.m. To: CentOS mailing list Subject: [CentOS] Loss of Prompt Cursor When I log into a virtual console as ordinary user, I initially have a prompt cursor. After I print 24 lines or more, the last visible (24th) line will be data instead of the prompt cursor. The up arrow no longer gives the previous commands. A clear command will restore the prompt cursor. This bug first appeared after I installed CentOS5. I do not believe it is a CentOS5 bug however because when I boot Ubuntu from a LivePC CDROM, the same thing happens. Any comments/suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks in advance - Bob T. Use the size/position controls of your monitor to shrink and reposition the displayed image (or your monitor may have an auto-adjust feature which can be invoked). My guess is that the 25th line is being displayed, with prompt and cursor etc, but is off the bottom of visible screen area. Craig Miskell === Attention: The information contained in this message and/or attachments from AgResearch Limited is intended only for the persons or entities to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipients is prohibited by AgResearch Limited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. === ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum download with erros pertaining libpurple
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 12:44 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: Gregory P. Ennis wrote: On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 12:20 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: Are you using the yum-fastestmirror and yum-priorities plugins (I highly recommend both)? I removed RPMforge and these are what is left. Loading skip-broken plugin Loading changelog plugin Loading priorities plugin Loading allowdowngrade plugin Loading fastestmirror plugin Loading downloadonly plugin Loading installonlyn plugin Loading tsflags plugin Loading protectbase plugin Loading fedorakmod plugin Loading kernel-module plugin Does the priorities plugin give the CentOS repositories priority over RPMforge? Yes it does (when configured) See: http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities (You probably don't need all those plugins ... and you do nt want both protectbase and priorities installed at the same time) Thank you for the link... very informative!! Is the reason not to have both protectbase and priority installed at the same time related to the obvious that they do similar things? Greg ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] question on kernel compile
I think I followed the directions on kernel compile (actually I downloaded 2.6.21.5). did the make oldconfig, did make menuconfig, did my compile and everything is working fine in that regard. My question now is how do I take that kernel configuration and use it for another machine that also needs the 2.6.21.5 kernel. Basically I am trying to save the step of going back into menuconfig and reselecting what I wanted. Thanks, Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Sparc
John Bowden wrote: Sorry to hijack this thread. I have got some old Sparc station 5's any one know of an o/s that I can install on them. I would like to learn all about clustering SS5 or Sun Ultra 5 ? the SS5 is way WAY old (discontinued in 1996), 70Mhz and used oddball memory, 8 x 8MB (64MB total) or 8 x 32MB (256MB total maximum), and used SBus peripherals, you'd be better off with pentium-II systems. clusters generally need multiple network adapters at the very least. The Ultra 5 is somewhat newer, with a 270-400MHz ultrasparc IIi and support for up to 512MB ram,, but was penalized (heavily!) by using a programmed IO IDE channel controller (no DMA). It also requires nonstandard RAM (EDO DRAM with ECC in a 168 pin jedec form factor), very hard to find. anyways, I think you'd have better luck trying to bring up a test cluster using old x86 PCs. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: hardware for a test cluster setup
John R Pierce wrote: Sorry to hijack this thread. I have got some old Sparc station 5's any one know of an o/s that I can install on them. I would like to learn all about clustering anyways, I think you'd have better luck trying to bring up a test cluster using old x86 PCs. or just a bunch of VM's on your laptop :) - KB -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Sparc
On 7/7/07, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: By chance, has there been any progress on a 5.0 version for an Ultra Sparc? At this point, I do not know of any effort towards a Sparc version. The problems in getting usable documentation and determined developers. I would probably look at Debian for your best support chances... they hopefully have enough interested developers towards that platform. I dealt with Sparc a while back... and while it is a beauty in someways.. the various models and chipsets are more propietary than an iPhone. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. The Merchant of Venice ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Sparc
On Monday 09 July 2007 22:41:04 John R Pierce wrote: John Bowden wrote: Sorry to hijack this thread. I have got some old Sparc station 5's any one know of an o/s that I can install on them. I would like to learn all about clustering SS5 or Sun Ultra 5 ? the SS5 is way WAY old (discontinued in 1996), 70Mhz and used oddball memory, 8 x 8MB (64MB total) or 8 x 32MB (256MB total maximum), and used SBus peripherals, you'd be better off with pentium-II systems. clusters generally need multiple network adapters at the very least. Yes exactly what I have, with massive 520Mb hard drives ;-) The architecture is completely new to me The Ultra 5 is somewhat newer, with a 270-400MHz ultrasparc IIi and support for up to 512MB ram,, but was penalized (heavily!) by using a programmed IO IDE channel controller (no DMA). It also requires nonstandard RAM (EDO DRAM with ECC in a 168 pin jedec form factor), very hard to find. anyways, I think you'd have better luck trying to bring up a test cluster using old x86 PCs. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos I think I will get rid of them as I have some old 333mhz boards. thanks for the reply. I will hand back the thread now -- Guy Fawkes, the only man to enter the house's of Parliament with honest intentions, (he was going to blow them up!) Registered Linux user number 414240 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] bind issue on centos 5 (SOLVED)
Hi everyone,
Finally, I got it solved.
The issue was my named.conf file. pls see below.
zone example77.com IN {
type master;
file master/example77.com.zone;
};
The below error happened
Jul 5 15:50:32 gateway named[3548]: master/example77.com.zone:11:
example77.com\032: bad owner name (check-names)
in the above zone line, between example.com , double quotes should be
included. But trailing double quotes was with a ONE SPACE.
I rectified as follows.
zone example77.com IN {
type master;
file master/example77.com.zone;
};
Thanks, EVERYONE.
On 7/7/07, Robert Spangler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu July 5 2007 06:29, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] master]# cat example77.com.zone
$TTL86400
@ IN SOA gateway.example77.com. root.example77.com. (
2006101604 ; Serial
1800 ; Refresh
300; Retry
36 ; Expire
86400 ); Minimum
NS gateway.example77.com.
MX 10 gateway.example77.com.
MX 20 mail.example77.com.
A 192.168.0.3
gateway A192.168.0.3
mailA 192.168.0.2
But, I still get the same error. pls see below.
Jul 5 15:50:32 gateway named[3548]: master/example77.com.zone:11:
example77.com\032: bad owner name (check-names)
This error is telling you that the error is in line 11.
The error as some have already told you is the space.
Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner.
--
Regards
Robert
Smile... it increases your face value!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
--
Thank you
Indunil Jayasooriya
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
