[CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0992 Moderate CentOS 3 ia64 libpng - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0992 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0992.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/libpng-1.2.2-28.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/libpng-devel-1.2.2-28.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/libpng10-1.0.13-18.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/libpng10-devel-1.0.13-18.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0992 Moderate CentOS 3 s390(x) libpng - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0992 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0992.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/libpng-1.2.2-28.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/libpng-devel-1.2.2-28.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/libpng10-1.0.13-18.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/libpng10-devel-1.0.13-18.s390.rpm s390x: updates/s390x/RPMS/libpng-1.2.2-28.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/libpng-devel-1.2.2-28.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/libpng10-1.0.13-18.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/libpng10-devel-1.0.13-18.s390x.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0992 Moderate CentOS 4 ia64 libpng - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0992 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0992.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/libpng-1.2.7-3.c4.1.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/libpng-devel-1.2.7-3.c4.1.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/libpng10-1.0.16-3.c4.1.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/libpng10-devel-1.0.16-3.c4.1.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch
Michael Rock napsal(a): I still need to get the P5K-VM setup and since it is a server I would still like to use Centos. Are the new DVD's ready yet? -- Mike Well, I have tried to recreate ISOs, with delta files. Everything's fine: ... zsh.x86_64: copying unchanged payload zsh-html.x86_64: copying unchanged payload iso sucessfully re-created, md5sum: 73765c4be8d5bebbce7a6e894370d031 Recreated ISO file is the very same as original ICH9 ISO. I have published the full DVD too. As to new kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15, I'm in process of building a new i686 and x86_64 version but it really takes a lot of time. I do have x86_64 rpms ready now and I'm trying to build i686. I'm building i686 version for the fourth time. Every time it ended with segmentation fault under kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15, so now I'm trying to build under kernel-2.6.18-8.1.14 now. I seems to me that kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15 has some problems under VMWare. I'd like to point that I'm trying my best and it takes long time, even that I have dual xeon and dual opteron machines. I have to build about 12 kernel RPMS, prepare DVD content, run buildinstall, make isos, run makedeltaiso, and etc. It really takes very long time, not my time but machine time. Regards, David ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] logrotate problem
Ralph Angenendt wrote: Christopher Chan wrote: Man, I missed that one. Serves me right for switching email accounts. At least you just poke fun. If Robin Socha was here...we would have endless fun/torment. Shall I invite him? Why, that would be wonderful. Or better not, otherwise I won't be able to leave my computer. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch
David Hrbác wrote: Michael Rock napsal(a): I still need to get the P5K-VM setup and since it is a server I would still like to use Centos. Are the new DVD's ready yet? -- Mike Well, I have tried to recreate ISOs, with delta files. Everything's fine: ... zsh.x86_64: copying unchanged payload zsh-html.x86_64: copying unchanged payload iso sucessfully re-created, md5sum: 73765c4be8d5bebbce7a6e894370d031 Recreated ISO file is the very same as original ICH9 ISO. I have published the full DVD too. As to new kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15, I'm in process of building a new i686 and x86_64 version but it really takes a lot of time. I do have x86_64 rpms ready now and I'm trying to build i686. I'm building i686 version for the fourth time. Every time it ended with segmentation fault under kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15, so now I'm trying to build under kernel-2.6.18-8.1.14 now. I seems to me that kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15 has some problems under VMWare. I'd like to point that I'm trying my best and it takes long time, even that I have dual xeon and dual opteron machines. I have to build about 12 kernel RPMS, prepare DVD content, run buildinstall, make isos, run makedeltaiso, and etc. It really takes very long time, not my time but machine time. Regards, David David, WELCOME TO MY WORLD :D (Hey, are the new foobar packages done, how about the xwyz packages) Thanks, JOhnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] public Key Problems after Centos 4 - 5 update.
Robert Slade wrote: On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 03:11 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: Robert Slade wrote: On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 19:06 +0100, Robert Slade wrote: Hi, I have just updated my system from Centos 4 to 5 using the DVD. When I try to update using Yum, it gets so far then I get: Public key for tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api-5.5.23-0jpp.3.0.2.el5.i386.rpm is not installed How do I get the key and install it? To reply to my own post, the answer was obvious when I thought about it. It was looking for the GPG key downloaded and imported it and Bob's your uncle. Slightly puzzled that yum didn't automatically do it as per the documents though. Maybe the CentOS-Base.repo file in your /etc/yum.repos.d/ is the one for CentOS-4 and not CentOS-5. The only difference between the CentOS-4 and CentOS-5 repo files is the key ... we have different keys for CentOS-4 and CentOS-5. By default, there are many CONFIG files that are not replaced if they have been updated when you do normal upgrades. In most cases, you will instead get a file that is a replacement called config-file-name.rpmnew On an upgrade from CentOS-4 to CentOS-5, you will have MANY files named .rpmnew that you will need to look at and you will need to modify the appropriate config files that are currently in place (and designed for CentOS-4) to work with CentOS-5. Johnny, Thanks for the pointer, I did have a CentOS-Base.repo.rmpnew file. I am still unsure what is happening with yum. I am getting this now: Loading protectbase plugin Loading installonlyn plugin /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/plugins.py:380: DeprecationWarning: registerOpt() will go away in a future version of Yum. Please manipulate config.YumConf and config.RepoConf directly. DeprecationWarning) Unfortunately, the documenation on the web site for yum does not cover Centos5. You may not have the latest version of yum or some of the plugins Please do this command (all one line): rpm -q yum python yum-metadata-parser yum-utils yum-protectbase yum-plugin-protectbase The results should be this for the latest versions: yum-3.0.5-1.el5.centos.2 python-2.4.3-19.el5 yum-metadata-parser-1.0-8.fc6 yum-utils-1.0.4-2.el5.centos yum-protectbase-1.0.4-2.el5.centos package yum-plugin-protectbase is not installed If you have yum-plugin-protectbase (and not yum-protectbase) installed, you need to replace yum-plugin-protectbase ... that is the old version from CentOs-4. Also you need to review the plugins directories if you had any plugins installed in CentOS-4 (/etc/yum and /etc/yum/pluginconf.d) to make sure there are not any file_name.conf.rpmnew files. You currently have installonlyn and protectbase enabled ... I would recommend that you properly configure your CentOS-Base.repo to use yum-priorities instead of yum-protectbase. Also, if you are using the CentOS-Base.repo file and if you are using the mirrorlist option instead of some specific baseurl mirrors, then I would also recommend the yum-fastestmirror plugin. Please see this link for plugin install and configuration: http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum BTW, upgrades are not normally clean. I personally recommend that people never upgrade, but instead backup their data and do a fresh install, then move data over. The upstream provider also recommends this: http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Installation_Guide-en-US/ch-upgrade-x86.html Read specifically the first four paragraphs under the title: 23.1. Determining Whether to Upgrade or Re-Install Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 32, Issue 17
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest...
Today's Topics:
1. CEBA-2007:0977 CentOS 5 i386 gnbd-kmod Update (Karanbir Singh)
2. CEBA-2007:0977 CentOS 5 x86_64 gnbd-kmod Update (Karanbir Singh)
3. CESA-2007:0975 Important CentOS 5 i386 flac Update
(Karanbir Singh)
4. CESA-2007:0975 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 flac Update
(Karanbir Singh)
5. CESA-2007:0992 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 libpng Update
(Karanbir Singh)
6. CESA-2007:0992 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 libpngUpdate
(Karanbir Singh)
7. CEBA-2007:0978 CentOS 5 x86_64 gfs-kmod Update (Karanbir Singh)
8. CEBA-2007:0978 CentOS 5 i386 gfs-kmod Update (Karanbir Singh)
--
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:04:24 +0100
From: Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2007:0977 CentOS 5 i386 gnbd-kmod
Update
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2007:0977
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0977.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
3308267c6757d7219f6c6b0df781c78c kmod-gnbd-0.1.3-4.2.6.18_8.1.15.el5.i686.rpm
936ca942c0bcf7e7a20e2a489e8d9d49
kmod-gnbd-PAE-0.1.3-4.2.6.18_8.1.15.el5.i686.rpm
2cc164aa0dcf2a43b00ead41d11d5d11
kmod-gnbd-xen-0.1.3-4.2.6.18_8.1.15.el5.i686.rpm
Source:
93bc9ae0a064092b86fa67f2cab1f6c2 gnbd-kmod-0.1.3-4.2.6.18_8.1.15.el5.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:04:25 +0100
From: Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2007:0977 CentOS 5 x86_64 gnbd-kmod
Update
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2007:0977
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0977.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
a063f498832ca79bf139ad3e05b3c374 kmod-gnbd-0.1.3-4.2.6.18_8.1.15.el5.x86_64.rpm
9b1d8cdb61fcef11aa72a4dd4b75dc1e
kmod-gnbd-xen-0.1.3-4.2.6.18_8.1.15.el5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
93bc9ae0a064092b86fa67f2cab1f6c2 gnbd-kmod-0.1.3-4.2.6.18_8.1.15.el5.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Message: 3
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 01:06:36 +0100
From: Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0975 Important CentOS 5 i386 flac
Update
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0975 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0975.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
638e032eb39fdcd60d353b4ad57a7872 flac-1.1.2-28.el5_0.1.i386.rpm
36d37a0eb1b6cd9539e1f3e8193710b7 flac-devel-1.1.2-28.el5_0.1.i386.rpm
Source:
79bd8394d5c145d0f6d3a123a2a75f35 flac-1.1.2-28.el5_0.1.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Message: 4
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 01:06:37 +0100
From: Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0975 Important CentOS 5 x86_64
flacUpdate
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0975 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0975.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
638e032eb39fdcd60d353b4ad57a7872 flac-1.1.2-28.el5_0.1.i386.rpm
d334041d884dc93fc9b5480f2e433f6b flac-1.1.2-28.el5_0.1.x86_64.rpm
36d37a0eb1b6cd9539e1f3e8193710b7 flac-devel-1.1.2-28.el5_0.1.i386.rpm
b0807e68efc994843a3d08b06cd8 flac-devel-1.1.2-28.el5_0.1.x86_64.rpm
Source:
79bd8394d5c145d0f6d3a123a2a75f35 flac-1.1.2-28.el5_0.1.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Message: 5
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 01:13:08 +0100
From: Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[CentOS] mp3 recorder?
I have my tape deck connected to my PC's line-in port, but Audacity's unstable release is unable to pick up the audio, though when I select the proper device and play with the volume control in the app, the audio does change. What other mp3 capture programs do people use? My goal is to simply capture each side of a tape to mp3, then use Audacity to break each song to its own mp3 file. Thanks. Scott ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] mp3 recorder?
What other mp3 capture programs do people use? My goal is to simply capture each side of a tape to mp3, then use Audacity to break each song to its own mp3 file. would mplayer do? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] mp3 recorder?
On 10/27/07, Scott Ehrlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have my tape deck connected to my PC's line-in port, but Audacity's unstable release is unable to pick up the audio, though when I select the proper device and play with the volume control in the app, the audio does change. What other mp3 capture programs do people use? My goal is to simply capture each side of a tape to mp3, then use Audacity to break each song to its own mp3 file. Thanks. Scott audacity should be able to do it and is available from rpmforge. Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] public Key Problems after Centos 4 - 5 update.
On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 05:11 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: Robert Slade wrote: On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 03:11 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: Robert Slade wrote: On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 19:06 +0100, Robert Slade wrote: Hi, I have just updated my system from Centos 4 to 5 using the DVD. When I try to update using Yum, it gets so far then I get: Public key for tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api-5.5.23-0jpp.3.0.2.el5.i386.rpm is not installed How do I get the key and install it? To reply to my own post, the answer was obvious when I thought about it. It was looking for the GPG key downloaded and imported it and Bob's your uncle. Slightly puzzled that yum didn't automatically do it as per the documents though. Maybe the CentOS-Base.repo file in your /etc/yum.repos.d/ is the one for CentOS-4 and not CentOS-5. The only difference between the CentOS-4 and CentOS-5 repo files is the key ... we have different keys for CentOS-4 and CentOS-5. By default, there are many CONFIG files that are not replaced if they have been updated when you do normal upgrades. In most cases, you will instead get a file that is a replacement called config-file-name.rpmnew On an upgrade from CentOS-4 to CentOS-5, you will have MANY files named .rpmnew that you will need to look at and you will need to modify the appropriate config files that are currently in place (and designed for CentOS-4) to work with CentOS-5. Johnny, Thanks for the pointer, I did have a CentOS-Base.repo.rmpnew file. I am still unsure what is happening with yum. I am getting this now: Loading protectbase plugin Loading installonlyn plugin /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/plugins.py:380: DeprecationWarning: registerOpt() will go away in a future version of Yum. Please manipulate config.YumConf and config.RepoConf directly. DeprecationWarning) Unfortunately, the documenation on the web site for yum does not cover Centos5. You may not have the latest version of yum or some of the plugins Please do this command (all one line): rpm -q yum python yum-metadata-parser yum-utils yum-protectbase yum-plugin-protectbase The results should be this for the latest versions: yum-3.0.5-1.el5.centos.2 python-2.4.3-19.el5 yum-metadata-parser-1.0-8.fc6 yum-utils-1.0.4-2.el5.centos yum-protectbase-1.0.4-2.el5.centos package yum-plugin-protectbase is not installed If you have yum-plugin-protectbase (and not yum-protectbase) installed, you need to replace yum-plugin-protectbase ... that is the old version from CentOs-4. Also you need to review the plugins directories if you had any plugins installed in CentOS-4 (/etc/yum and /etc/yum/pluginconf.d) to make sure there are not any file_name.conf.rpmnew files. You currently have installonlyn and protectbase enabled ... I would recommend that you properly configure your CentOS-Base.repo to use yum-priorities instead of yum-protectbase. Also, if you are using the CentOS-Base.repo file and if you are using the mirrorlist option instead of some specific baseurl mirrors, then I would also recommend the yum-fastestmirror plugin. Please see this link for plugin install and configuration: http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum BTW, upgrades are not normally clean. I personally recommend that people never upgrade, but instead backup their data and do a fresh install, then move data over. The upstream provider also recommends this: http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Installation_Guide-en-US/ch-upgrade-x86.html Read specifically the first four paragraphs under the title: 23.1. Determining Whether to Upgrade or Re-Install Thanks, Johnny Hughes Johnny, one again many thanks. You were right I had yum-plugin-protectbase rather than yum-protectbase. I had removed fastestmirror as it caused Yum to crash when I first ran it.I have reinstalled it and it looks like all is well now. I decided to upgrade rather than reinstall as this is a desktop system and I do have the data backed up so I could always do a clean install if the upgrade failed. I have done a search for *.rpmnew and there are surprisingly few - working my way through them now. Again Many Thanks Rob ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] mp3 recorder?
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007, Akemi Yagi wrote: On 10/27/07, Scott Ehrlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have my tape deck connected to my PC's line-in port, but Audacity's unstable release is unable to pick up the audio, though when I select the proper device and play with the volume control in the app, the audio does change. What other mp3 capture programs do people use? My goal is to simply capture each side of a tape to mp3, then use Audacity to break each song to its own mp3 file. Thanks. Scott audacity should be able to do it and is available from rpmforge. My original message (above) says Audacity is not visually showing the audio line levels or wave form when recording, thus I am not convinced it is capturing anything. Scott Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] mp3 recorder?
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007, Christopher Chan wrote: What other mp3 capture programs do people use? My goal is to simply capture each side of a tape to mp3, then use Audacity to break each song to its own mp3 file. would mplayer do? A google search of mplayer audio recording reflects web streaming, not line/mic-level on a local pc. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] mp3 recorder?
Scott Ehrlich wrote: On Sat, 27 Oct 2007, Christopher Chan wrote: What other mp3 capture programs do people use? My goal is to simply capture each side of a tape to mp3, then use Audacity to break each song to its own mp3 file. would mplayer do? A google search of mplayer audio recording reflects web streaming, not line/mic-level on a local pc. Hmm...I wonder how mplayer records audio from TV capture cards then. Anyway, let me see if I can get something from my mic. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] mp3 recorder?
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007, Paul wrote: On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 09:17 -0400, Scott Ehrlich wrote: On Sat, 27 Oct 2007, Akemi Yagi wrote: On 10/27/07, Scott Ehrlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have my tape deck connected to my PC's line-in port, but Audacity's unstable release is unable to pick up the audio, though when I select the proper device and play with the volume control in the app, the audio does change. What other mp3 capture programs do people use? My goal is to simply capture each side of a tape to mp3, then use Audacity to break each song to its own mp3 file. Thanks. Scott audacity should be able to do it and is available from rpmforge. My original message (above) says Audacity is not visually showing the audio line levels or wave form when recording, thus I am not convinced it is capturing anything. Which probably is an issue with your sound configuration somehow ... I've had issues getting audio in to work with a couple different cards because it's sometimes difficult to get the right input selected. My Sound Blaster Live 5.1 has literally a dozen different input sources to select from, finding the correct combination was a bit of trial error. A google search uncovered alsamixer. I installed it, then playing with it and Audacity recovered the audio and I'm using Audacity now, along with lame for wav mp3 conversion. Thanks. Scott Paul ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] forcing device to USB HDD
Hi, I bought an USB external hdd (500GB) to make my backups using dump... but, sometimes my sever recognize the hdd device /dev/sdb or /dev/sdc... my question is: How can I assign a fixed device for example /dev/sdc to my hdd? remember I use some scripts to do my backup and I am getting errors because the device changes from sdb to sdc and thanks in advance Israel __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] forcing device to USB HDD
On Saturday 27 October 2007 12:20:31 Israel Garcia wrote: Hi, I bought an USB external hdd (500GB) to make my backups using dump... but, sometimes my sever recognize the hdd device /dev/sdb or /dev/sdc... my question is: How can I assign a fixed device for example /dev/sdc to my hdd? remember I use some scripts to do my backup and I am getting errors because the device changes from sdb to sdc and I would imagine by manually mounting it -- Bobby ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] forcing device to USB HDD
On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 12:27 -0400, Bobby wrote: On Saturday 27 October 2007 12:20:31 Israel Garcia wrote: Hi, I bought an USB external hdd (500GB) to make my backups using dump... but, sometimes my sever recognize the hdd device /dev/sdb or /dev/sdc... my question is: How can I assign a fixed device for example /dev/sdc to my hdd? remember I use some scripts to do my backup and I am getting errors because the device changes from sdb to sdc and I would imagine by manually mounting it Ummm no, that is the problem I imagine, the device changes so it can't be mounted in his script. I can't think of a solution right off hand. Paul ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch
WELCOME TO MY WORLD :D (Hey, are the new foobar packages done, how about the xwyz packages) Thanks, JOhnny Hughes When you snip the rest of my post man that last request sounds really bad on its own. Sorry guys. I saw the uploading the new DVD's a few days ago and thought I would ask. I really do not want to put anyone out and please do not go through any trouble on my account. I would rather be contributing rather than asking. Like I said I had already moved to Fedora for the P5KC and for the P5K-VM I have been trying to duplicate what Dave is doing. But I never know if I am doing it right or what else am I screwing up by rolling only new kernel rpms. Perhaps that is the kind of questions I should be asking rather than ask if things are ready. Can you get away with taking new kernels from kernel.org and making rpms out of them to use with Centos 5.0 without it effecting anything else or having to upgrade anything else? Thanks again. btw - like I said in email last week at the start of this thread you never hear from me but your efforts maintaining Centos are greatly appreciated. Since I have had stable servers and anything I need is usually already found here without even asking. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] migrating files for centos virtualization, virtual disk no longer boots.
All, I am playing with virtualization on centos 5. I took my old redhat 7 disks and created a 10GIG virtual disk, I installed redhat 7. Now I am trying to get the EXACT image copied off of my actual redhat 7 disk so that I know it is the same (including all patches, updates and OTHER things I did to it that I have forgotten about). I booted the redhat 7 image just fine at this point. I also copied it for backup so I dont have to install again. So on my centos 5 box I mounted the image with a loop command. mount -t ext3 -o loop,offset=32256 redhat7.img /mnt/image This works fine. Then I logged into the redhat 7 system and executed the command tar --exclude ./proc --exclude ./mnt --exclude ./sys --exclude ./dev -cvf - . | ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( cd /mnt/image ; tar xvpf -) Where 192.168.1.8 is my centos 5 box and /mnt/image the mounted image. The copy seems to go fine. But after I do this when I try to virtualize the redhat7 image it stops at: GRUB When I copy the second image back on top of the first image it then boots again. So glad I made that copy of the image file. What is happening with the tar command that is messing up grub and keeping it from booting? Thanks, Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] typo in /etc/X11/xinit/Xsession
line 15: if ( unask 077 cp /dev/null $errfile 2 /dev/null ); then Should be umask. -- lfr 0/0 pgpPXEZbwYz8L.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch
Oops sorry, ugh another poor selection of words as I meant to say When I saw the rest of my post snipped, I then realized that last request sounds really bad, which was not my intention. When you snip the rest of my post man that last request sounds really bad on its own. Sorry guys. I saw the uploading the new DVD's a few days ago and thought I would ask. I really do not want to put anyone out and please do not go through any trouble on my account. I would rather be contributing rather than asking. Like I said I had already moved to Fedora for the P5KC and for the P5K-VM I have been trying to duplicate what Dave is doing. But I never know if I am doing it right or what else am I screwing up by rolling only new kernel rpms. Perhaps that is the kind of questions I should be asking rather than ask if things are ready. Can you get away with taking new kernels from kernel.org and making rpms out of them to use with Centos 5.0 without it effecting anything else or having to upgrade anything else? Thanks again. btw - like I said in email last week at the start of this thread you never hear from me but your efforts maintaining Centos are greatly appreciated. Since I have had stable servers and anything I need is usually already found here without even asking. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] forcing device to USB HDD
Israel Garcia wrote: Hi, I bought an USB external hdd (500GB) to make my backups using dump... but, sometimes my sever recognize the hdd device /dev/sdb or /dev/sdc... my question is: How can I assign a fixed device for example /dev/sdc to my hdd? remember I use some scripts to do my backup and I am getting errors because the device changes from sdb to sdc and You can always set up a udev rule that will give the drive a known alias (e.g. backup_drive) based on some fixed information that is stored in sysfs (such as vendor or model). Your scripts can then use the alias instead of the real drive name. This article is a little out of date, but might be useful: http://www.redhat.com/magazine/002dec04/features/udev/ Michael ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] forcing device to USB HDD
On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 10:28 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: Paul wrote: I suppose you could put a label on the drive (with tune2fs), then mount it by LABEL=... I dunno what else to suggest. linux's crappy way of handling disk device names is one of my bigger gripes about it. its really messy in a SAN environment where there's several storage controllers. /dev/sdf could be almost -anything-.I prefer the c1t1d1 notation of traditional Unix systems like Solaris, although there still can be issues identifying the channel #s udev takes care to provide unique names to disk devices. By label, or by uuid. Take a look at /dev/disk/by-label or /dev/disk/by-uuid, and use those entries as device names. ciao andrea -- Question: “Is there a God?” Answer: “No.” From the Official God FAQ, http://www.400monkeys.com/God/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] typo in /etc/X11/xinit/Xsession
On 10/27/07, Luciano Rocha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: line 15: if ( unask 077 cp /dev/null $errfile 2 /dev/null ); then Should be umask. I assure you this is not Johnny's typo. Looks like it will be corrected in 5.2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236629 Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] typo in /etc/X11/xinit/Xsession
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 11:44:52AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: On 10/27/07, Luciano Rocha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: line 15: if ( unask 077 cp /dev/null $errfile 2 /dev/null ); then Should be umask. I assure you this is not Johnny's typo. Looks like it will be corrected in 5.2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236629 I didn't assume it was, I was only surprised to see it. Granted, it's in a seldom viewed file, but that file is executed all the time. -- lfr 0/0 pgpdsK4CHmMWg.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] forcing device to USB HDD
Les Mikesell wrote: Kenneth Porter wrote: --On Saturday, October 27, 2007 2:16 PM -0400 Michael D. Kralka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can always set up a udev rule that will give the drive a known alias (e.g. backup_drive) based on some fixed information that is stored in sysfs (such as vendor or model). Your scripts can then use the alias instead of the real drive name. This article is a little out of date, but might be useful: http://www.redhat.com/magazine/002dec04/features/udev/ What if you have more than one identical device and might want to plug more than one in at once? I would suspect including the serial number (along with vendor and model) to the udev rules would suffice. The probability that two devices will have a matching vendor, model, and serial number is infinitesimal, if not zero. Cheers, Michael ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] typo in /etc/X11/xinit/Xsession
On 10/27/07, Luciano Rocha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 11:44:52AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: On 10/27/07, Luciano Rocha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: line 15: if ( unask 077 cp /dev/null $errfile 2 /dev/null ); then Should be umask. I assure you this is not Johnny's typo. Looks like it will be corrected in 5.2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236629 I didn't assume it was, Well, not so fast. There is a good reason why that was a possibility: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-September/086581.html Be sure to read the next message in that thread :-) Granted, it's in a seldom viewed file, but that file is executed all the time. Indeed surprising. This typo was already in Fedora Core 6 and it had not been corrected until recently (Fedora 8): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=20835 Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15
Hi, It seems to me, that kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15 is maybe not ok. I have been trying to rebuild my patched kernel RPMS in virtual machine running i686 kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15. It had failed for the three times with segmentation fault. First run under kernel-2.6.18-8.1.14 went smoothly. So, maybe it's a kernel issue or it's VMWare (Server 1.04). Anyone to reproduce the issue? Thanks, David ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15
On 10/27/07, David Hrbáč [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, It seems to me, that kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15 is maybe not ok. I have been trying to rebuild my patched kernel RPMS in virtual machine running i686 kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15. It had failed for the three times with segmentation fault. First run under kernel-2.6.18-8.1.14 went smoothly. So, maybe it's a kernel issue or it's VMWare (Server 1.04). Anyone to reproduce the issue? Thanks, David I can certainly try it on my c5-i686 VM. But at which step does it segfault? Does it have to do with modsigning? Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15
Akemi Yagi napsal(a): I can certainly try it on my c5-i686 VM. But at which step does it segfault? Does it have to do with modsigning? Akemi As far as I remember yes. D. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kernel-2.6.18-8.1.15
Akemi Yagi napsal(a): Change *all* signmodules to zero as a workround. %define signmodules 0 It would go through then. Or else, build in mock. According to Johnny, the modsign problem does not occur in mock. Akemi OK, thanks. D. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] mp3 recorder?
Paul wrote: audacity should be able to do it and is available from rpmforge. My original message (above) says Audacity is not visually showing the audio line levels or wave form when recording, thus I am not convinced it is capturing anything. Which probably is an issue with your sound configuration somehow ... I've had issues getting audio in to work with a couple different cards because it's sometimes difficult to get the right input selected. My Sound Blaster Live 5.1 has literally a dozen different input sources to select from, finding the correct combination was a bit of trial error. I agree. I had similar issues and after some trial and error with my sound configuration I got the audio inputs for Audacity to behave as expected. It only took 10 minutes of fiddling on my relatively vanilla SP Live card. Best, ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
