[CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0968 Critical CentOS 4 x86_64 pcre - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0968 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0968.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: pcre-4.5-4.el4_5.1.i386.rpm pcre-4.5-4.el4_5.1.x86_64.rpm pcre-devel-4.5-4.el4_5.1.x86_64.rpm src: pcre-4.5-4.el4_5.1.src.rpm signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0968 Critical CentOS 4 i386 pcre - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0968 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0968.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: pcre-4.5-4.el4_5.1.i386.rpm pcre-devel-4.5-4.el4_5.1.i386.rpm src: pcre-4.5-4.el4_5.1.src.rpm signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0966 Important CentOS 4 x86_64 perl - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0966 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0966.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: perl-5.8.5-36.el4_5.2.x86_64.rpm perl-suidperl-5.8.5-36.el4_5.2.x86_64.rpm src: perl-5.8.5-36.el4_5.2.src.rpm signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:1022 Important CentOS 4 x86_64 cups - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:1022 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-1022.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: cups-1.1.22-0.rc1.9.20.2.el4_5.2.x86_64.rpm cups-devel-1.1.22-0.rc1.9.20.2.el4_5.2.x86_64.rpm cups-libs-1.1.22-0.rc1.9.20.2.el4_5.2.i386.rpm cups-libs-1.1.22-0.rc1.9.20.2.el4_5.2.x86_64.rpm src: cups-1.1.22-0.rc1.9.20.2.el4_5.2.src.rpm signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:1025 Important CentOS 4 i386 gpdf - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:1025 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-1025.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: gpdf-2.8.2-7.7.1.i386.rpm src: gpdf-2.8.2-7.7.1.src.rpm signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:1029 Important CentOS 4 x86_64 xpdf - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:1029 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-1029.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: xpdf-3.00-14.el4.x86_64.rpm src: xpdf-3.00-14.el4.src.rpm signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:1029 Important CentOS 4 i386 xpdf - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:1029 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-1029.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: xpdf-3.00-14.el4.i386.rpm src: xpdf-3.00-14.el4.src.rpm signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0966 Important CentOS 4 i386 perl - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0966 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0966.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: perl-5.8.5-36.el4_5.2.i386.rpm perl-suidperl-5.8.5-36.el4_5.2.i386.rpm src: perl-5.8.5-36.el4_5.2.src.rpm signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0966 Important CentOS 5 i386 perl Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0966 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0966.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
a471198cb7bbe7896f5c98ed73292ff8 perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2.i386.rpm
45cdbf2cc920b5418a5a00f3e62bfc2d perl-suidperl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2.i386.rpm
Source:
aefa042674edc71d8c5bf46812cf296c perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0966 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 perl Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0966 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0966.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
a471198cb7bbe7896f5c98ed73292ff8 perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2.i386.rpm
f3d9d733ef64f733c9faa202e6c07b15 perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2.x86_64.rpm
7cd00398f215746388ffd169db0d51aa perl-suidperl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2.x86_64.rpm
Source:
aefa042674edc71d8c5bf46812cf296c perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0967 Critical CentOS 5 x86_64 pcre Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0967 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0967.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
f1713343d148ac1009aa394f33ce44d6 pcre-6.6-2.el5_0.1.i386.rpm
e8a5d7756ddf0f4d795a8b45c8d3a39b pcre-6.6-2.el5_0.1.x86_64.rpm
c13c58fce6f093e1a1f501a76a0cd8c8 pcre-devel-6.6-2.el5_0.1.i386.rpm
3384fcc1f9f4f192397fa41d2ae3b864 pcre-devel-6.6-2.el5_0.1.x86_64.rpm
Source:
82f44b7be346fdc76eaef7632842ace5 pcre-6.6-2.el5_0.1.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0967 Critical CentOS 5 i386 pcre Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0967 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0967.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
f1713343d148ac1009aa394f33ce44d6 pcre-6.6-2.el5_0.1.i386.rpm
c13c58fce6f093e1a1f501a76a0cd8c8 pcre-devel-6.6-2.el5_0.1.i386.rpm
Source:
82f44b7be346fdc76eaef7632842ace5 pcre-6.6-2.el5_0.1.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:1027 Important CentOS 4 s390(x) tetex - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:1027 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-1027.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/tetex-2.0.2-22.0.1.EL4.10.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/tetex-afm-2.0.2-22.0.1.EL4.10.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/tetex-doc-2.0.2-22.0.1.EL4.10.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/tetex-dvips-2.0.2-22.0.1.EL4.10.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/tetex-fonts-2.0.2-22.0.1.EL4.10.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/tetex-latex-2.0.2-22.0.1.EL4.10.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/tetex-xdvi-2.0.2-22.0.1.EL4.10.s390.rpm s390x: updates/s390x/RPMS/tetex-2.0.2-22.0.1.EL4.10.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/tetex-afm-2.0.2-22.0.1.EL4.10.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/tetex-doc-2.0.2-22.0.1.EL4.10.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/tetex-dvips-2.0.2-22.0.1.EL4.10.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/tetex-fonts-2.0.2-22.0.1.EL4.10.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/tetex-latex-2.0.2-22.0.1.EL4.10.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/tetex-xdvi-2.0.2-22.0.1.EL4.10.s390x.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:1027 Important CentOS 4 ia64 tetex - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:1027 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-1027.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/tetex-2.0.2-22.0.1.EL4.10.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/tetex-afm-2.0.2-22.0.1.EL4.10.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/tetex-doc-2.0.2-22.0.1.EL4.10.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/tetex-dvips-2.0.2-22.0.1.EL4.10.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/tetex-fonts-2.0.2-22.0.1.EL4.10.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/tetex-latex-2.0.2-22.0.1.EL4.10.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/tetex-xdvi-2.0.2-22.0.1.EL4.10.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS-es] sobre yum
El Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 01:54:11PM +0100, newLin escribio: el archivo lo tengo. pero que quiere decir: [UTFSM-base] El texto entre corchetes, indica el nombre con el que yum tratará el repositorio. Así, por ejemplo, puedes deshabilitarlo usando la opcion --disablerepo=UTFSM-base name=CentOS-$releasever - Base Es el nombre del repositorio. baseurl=ftp://ftp.inf.utfsm.cl/pub/Linux/centos/$releasever/os/$basearch/ Esta es la URL base en donde yum buscara inicialmente los paquetes y archivos del repos. gpgkey=ftp://ftp.inf.utfsm.cl/pub/Linux/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-centos$releasever Esto indica en donde encuentra la llave publica de centos, permite que yum pueda comprobar que el paquete descargado es oficial por estar firmado por centos. gpgcheck=1 Indica que se realize la verificacion de la firma al RPM descargado. enabled=1 Indica que el repositorio está activado. Si estuviera en 0, entonces yum omite el repositorio. Una linea adicional, importante también es mirrorlist= En donde especificas la ruta a un archivo que contiene URL de repositorios separados por saltos de linea. Estos repositorios serán ocupado en caso de que no se encuentre la información en el baseurl o se pierda en enlace hasta este. Mira la documentacion de yum.conf(5). Ahí sale todo explicado. Saludos! -- Renato Covarrubias Romero - counter.li.org #399677 rcovarru [at] alumnos.inf.utfsm.cl rnt [at] bla.cl Estudiante Ingenieria Civil Informatica, Casa Central, UTFSM. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] ?? Que esta mal??
# /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-UTFSM.repo # # This file uses the CentOS mirror at UTFSM FTP server. # # [UTFSM-base] name=CentOS-$releasever - Base baseurl=ftp://ftp.softwarelibre.cu/centos/$releasever/os/$basearch/ gpgkey=ftp://ftp.softwarelibre.cu/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-centos$releasever gpgcheck=1 enabled=1 [UTFSM-updates] name=CentOS-$releasever - Updates baseurl=ftp://ftp.softwarelibre.cu/centos/$releasever/updates/$basearch/ gpgkey=ftp://ftp.softwarelibre.cu/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-centos$releasever gpgcheck=1 enabled=1 [UTFSM-extras] name=CentOS-$releasever - Extras baseurl=ftp://ftp.softwarelibre.cu/centos/$releasever/extras/$basearch/ gpgkey=ftp://ftp.softwarelibre.cu/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-centos$releasever gpgcheck=1 enabled=1 [UTFSM-centosplus] name=CentOS-$releasever - Plus baseurl=ftp://ftp.softwarelibre.cu/centos/$releasever/centosplus/$basearch/ gpgkey=ftp://ftp.softwarelibre.cu/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-centos$releasever gpgcheck=1 enabled=1 [UTFSM-fasttrack] name=CentOS-$releasever - FastTrack baseurl=ftp://ftp.softwarelibre.cu/centos/$releasever/fasttrack/$basearch/ gpgkey=ftp://ftp.softwarelibre.cu/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-centos$releasever gpgcheck=1 enabled=1 [UTFSM-csfg] name=CentOS-$releasever - CSFG baseurl=ftp://ftp.softwarelibre.cu/centos/$releasever/csfg/$basearch/ gpgkey=ftp://ftp.softwarelibre.cu/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-centos$releasever gpgcheck=1 enabled=1 ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] Ayuda please
cuando ejecuto: yum update, aparece lo siguiente: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# yum update Setting up Update Process Setting up repositories ftp://ftp.softwarelibre.cu/centos/4/extras/i386/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 4] IOError: urlopen error (-2, 'Nombre o servicio desconocido') Trying other mirror. Cannot open/read repomd.xml file for repository: UTFSM-extras failure: repodata/repomd.xml from UTFSM-extras: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. Error: failure: repodata/repomd.xml from UTFSM-extras: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. ___ en otro correo voy a enviar el archivo: /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-UTFSM.repo para ver si me dicen que tiene mal. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Proxy-cache
Hector Martínez Romo wrote: Estimados ¿Alguna recomendación respecto de cual es el mejor Proxy.cache y filtro de contenidos? Muchas gracias por los aportes. Yo uso squid y squidguard y anda bastante bien Saludos a la lista. * La información contenida en esta transmisión es confidencial y no puede ser usada o difundida por personas distintas a su(s) destinatario(s). El uso no autorizado de la información contenida en este correo puede ser sancionado criminalmente de conformidad con la Ley Chilena. Si ha recibido un correo por error, por favor destrúyalo y notifique al remitente. El Departamento de Informática del Ministerio de Educación le recomienda, para el buen desempeño de su correo, lo siguiente: - revise su correo diariamente - pida confirmación de los correos que envía - oriéntese de las buenas practicas en el uso del correo ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- #--- -Con linux no siempre Ganas :( Charla entra amigote y la bruja Amigote: Che asi que lo enganchaste nomas como lo convenciste la bruja: Facil me disfrace de Pinguino y acepto enceguida ;) #--- ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Squid 2.6
Freddy Angulo wrote: Hola amigos: tengo una problema con el squid 2.6, elo he configurado como proxy tranparente y ha estado funcionando con normalidad, pero ahora cada q se accede a 1 o 3 paginas a lo mucho el servicio se bloquea como q si no estuviese el servicio corriendo, volvi a reinstalar el squid y el problema es el mismo, le coloco la configuracion de mi squid.conf, para q me digan si falta algun valor que hay que agregar para q funcione a la perfeccion. espero me puedan ayudar. Gracias * para q el servicio se restablesca tengo q estar reiniciando el servicio. http_port ipdelservidor:3128 transparent cache_mem 64 MB maximum_object_size 4096 KB cache_dir ufs /var/spool/squid 700 16 256 emulate_httpd_log on ftp_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] acl all src 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 acl manager proto cache_object acl localhost src 127.0.0.1/255.255.255.255 acl red src /etc/squid/Grupos/red # acl Black-List url_regex /etc/squid/Black-List acl Safe_ports port 80 443 21 20 1723 acl CONNECT method CONNECT # http_access allow localhost http_access allow red !Black-List http_access allow !Safe_ports http_access allow CONNECT http_access deny all cache_mgr [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http_port ipdelservidor:3128 transparent visible_hostname Squid Comparte video en la ventana de tus mensajes (y también tus fotos de Flickr). Usa el nuevo Yahoo! Messenger versión Beta. Visita http://e1.beta.messenger.yahoo.com/ ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es Y los logs que dicen??? -- #--- -Con linux no siempre Ganas :( Charla entra amigote y la bruja Amigote: Che asi que lo enganchaste nomas como lo convenciste la bruja: Facil me disfrace de Pinguino y acepto enceguida ;) #--- ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Proxy Automatico
Renato Covarrubias Romero wrote: El Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 04:04:41PM -0600, Victor Ramirez escribio: y eso como es. perdon la ignorancia pero apenas empiezo a conocer sobre proxies. no se si estoy bien. tengo mi subred 192.168.0.1 a la 192.168.0.99 para ips fijas y apartir de la 192.168.0.100 por ips dinamicas y ese rango es el que tengo filtrado para el proxy, lo que entiendo es que rediriga ese rango al proxy y nada mas en las maquinas de los usuarios ya no lo configuro o como? disculpas. Como recomendación extra, cambia el rango de sus Ip's. 192.168.0.1 - 192.168.0.126 : estaticas 192.168.0.129 - 192.168.0.254 : dinamicas Asi el segmento estático es el segmento 192.168.0.0/25 y el dinamico el 192.168.0.128/25 Esto te facilitará muchisimo la configuracion de todas las cosas. Exactamante asi seria , tendrias que redireccionar solamente esa subred http://www.google.cl/search?q=proxy+transparente Los primeros links son los más interesantes. Saludos! -- #--- -Con linux no siempre Ganas :( Charla entra amigote y la bruja Amigote: Che asi que lo enganchaste nomas como lo convenciste la bruja: Facil me disfrace de Pinguino y acepto enceguida ;) #--- ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] VNC en centos 5
Hola Amigos necesito de su apoyo, al grano. necesito manipular una maquina en la cual instale centos 5, desde mi pc windows xp y no se como configurar el servicio vncserver. hay un archivo en /etc/sysconfig/vncserver pero no como configurar porque no me responde estoy dentro de una lan de mi empresa Xvnc para que sirve?? saludos cordiales. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS] nss_ldap bug fix update for CentOS?
Hello, Is it Possible to create this fix for CentOS too? Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243753 Solution: http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0676.html regards Sebastian signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] connect: Invalid argument (ping local interface)
Hi Centos Users # ping 10.104.89.146 connect: Invalid argument The Server has normal network connectivity. I ssh into it over this interface. Strace output on Pastebin [0]. SELinux is disabled. Centos 4.3 cheers Simon [0] http://pastebin.com/m720052a8 -- XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 33, Issue 6
] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20071107/f7fbb6a5/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 8 Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 23:39:44 +0200 From: Pasi Pirhonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:1022 Important CentOS 4 s390(x) cups - security update To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:1022 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-1022.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/cups-1.1.22-0.rc1.9.20.2.c4.2.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/cups-devel-1.1.22-0.rc1.9.20.2.c4.2.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/cups-libs-1.1.22-0.rc1.9.20.2.c4.2.s390.rpm s390x: updates/s390x/RPMS/cups-1.1.22-0.rc1.9.20.2.c4.2.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/cups-devel-1.1.22-0.rc1.9.20.2.c4.2.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/cups-libs-1.1.22-0.rc1.9.20.2.c4.2.s390x.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20071107/08ded45e/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 9 Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 23:40:23 +0200 From: Pasi Pirhonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:1025 Important CentOS 4 s390(x) gpdf - security update To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:1025 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-1025.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/gpdf-2.8.2-7.7.1.s390.rpm s390x: updates/s390x/RPMS/gpdf-2.8.2-7.7.1.s390x.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20071107/9dc65628/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 10 Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 23:41:05 +0200 From: Pasi Pirhonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:1029 Important CentOS 4 s390(x) xpdf - security update To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:1029 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-1029.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/xpdf-3.00-14.el4.s390.rpm s390x: updates/s390x/RPMS/xpdf-3.00-14.el4.s390x.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20071107/54d96292/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 11 Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 00:07:06 +0100 From: Tru Huynh [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:1023 Important CentOS 3 i386 cups - security update To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2007:1023 cups security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-1023.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/cups-1.1.17-13.3.46.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/cups-devel-1.1.17-13.3.46.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/cups-libs-1.1.17-13.3.46.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/cups-1.1.17-13.3.46.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 i386 installations by running the command: yum update cups\* Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20071108/4f1c8d17/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 12 Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 00:08:35 +0100 From: Tru Huynh [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:1023 Important CentOS 3 x86_64
Re: [CentOS] connect: Invalid argument (ping local interface)
Simon Jolle wrote: Hi Centos Users # ping 10.104.89.146 connect: Invalid argument Do you get this with all kinds of arguments to ping, or is it just if you ping your own IP? # ping 130.226.184.9 # ping ftp.crc.dk # ping localhost # ping 127.0.0.1 Does the machine have more than one NIC? And NAT's to the 10.x.x.x addresses? Mogens -- Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg A/S, Computer Department Gamle Carlsberg Vej 10, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark Phone: +45 33 27 53 25, Fax: +45 33 27 47 08 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.crc.dk ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] connect: Invalid argument (ping local interface)
On Nov 8, 2007 12:48 PM, Simon Jolle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Centos Users # ping 10.104.89.146 connect: Invalid argument Did you try to ssh yourself, ping something else in your network and outside of your network ? What about ifconfig, route -n ? Did you enable IPV6 ? What is your last change before the problem appears ? Hope the answer is in my questions :-) The Server has normal network connectivity. I ssh into it over this interface. Strace output on Pastebin [0]. SELinux is disabled. Centos 4.3 cheers Simon [0] http://pastebin.com/m720052a8 -- XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Alain Spineux aspineux gmail com May the sources be with you ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Diskless Sharedroot Cluster
Hi all! We have just released new updates for the yum channel of the open-sharedroot software for CentOS4 and CentOS5. With the open-sharedroot software package, you can build up a NFS or GFS based diskless sharedroot cluster with CentOS4 and CentOS5. It also contains a toolset to clone or backup entire diskless sharedroot clusters. Open Sharedroot homepage: http://open-sharedroot.org/ Description of the software channel: http://open-sharedroot.org/faq/can-i-use-yum-or-up2date-to-install-the-software Mini HowTo for RHEL5/CentOS5 sharedroot clusters: http://open-sharedroot.org/documentation/rhel5-gfs-shared-root-mini-howto/view Feel free to download the software and have a lot of fun installing your sharedroot clusters !! Mark -- Gruss / Regards, Dipl.-Ing. Mark Hlawatschek http://www.atix.de/ http://www.open-sharedroot.org/ ** ATIX Informationstechnologie und Consulting AG Einsteinstr. 10 85716 Unterschleissheim Deutschland/Germany ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Bandwidth optimisation
I am using this on my CentOS 4 machine. I would expect it to work on a CentOS 5 machine as well. Add the following to /etc/sysctl.conf net.core.rmem_default = 67108864 net.core.wmem_default = 67108864 net.core.rmem_max = 67108864 net.core.wmem_max = 67108864 net.ipv4.tcp_mem = 4096 67108864 67108864 net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 67108864 67108864 net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 4096 67108864 67108864 Run sysctl -p Barry How can I change Time To Live (TTL) in Centos 5.0 x86? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] status of Centos 5.1?
On Nov 8, 2007 1:12 AM, Rainer Traut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, now that EL5.1 is out the big question is when will Centos 5.1 be out. I know the answer, when it's ready. According to KB, the target is in a couple of weeks. By the way, there are answers to that question other than when it's ready : http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=11128forum=37 But how is status of the problems described here? http://www.karan.org/blog/index.php/2007/10/29/so_when_is_5_1_due Thx Rainer ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Screensave issue in Centos 4.5
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 12:04:14AM -0600, Frank Cox wrote: On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 23:12:32 -0500 fred smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone got any idea how I can figure this one out? Is it possible that external factors are causing this? For example, the chap going past your desk to switch the coffee pot on may shake the desk enough to make the mouse move. Etc. Doubt it. Office closed at night. I've got (luckily) my own office. I'm often the first person there, but it'a always like this. -- Fred Smith -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me. -- Philippians 4:13 --- pgpO7tiML6znY.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] status of Centos 5.1?
Hi all, now that EL5.1 is out the big question is when will Centos 5.1 be out. I know the answer, when it's ready. But how is status of the problems described here? http://www.karan.org/blog/index.php/2007/10/29/so_when_is_5_1_due Thx Rainer ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] nss_ldap bug fix update for CentOS?
On Nov 8, 2007 3:08 AM, Sebastian Marten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Is it Possible to create this fix for CentOS too? Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243753 Solution: http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0676.html Yes. This should be rolled out as part of the centos 5.1 release I believe. RH has fixed huge loads of bugs in version 5, and I'm looking forward to taking the updates for a spin. -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] question about backup regimens
I need to recommend some backup options for a web server running CentOS 4.1. The client prefers using a tape drive as their backup device and has access to safe offsite storage. I was thinking of system backups weekly and differential backups nightly but don't know what software to recommend for the differential b/u's. For full backups I can just schedule a tar and compress using cron. Any recommendations would be appreciated. Marty -- Marty Landman, Face 2 Interface Inc. 845-679-9387 Drupal Development Blog: http://drupal.face2interface.com/ Free Database Search App: http://face2interface.com/Products/FormATable.shtml ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
change /opt to /win Was: Re: SOLVED: Re: [CentOS] Installing Google's Picasa for Linux on CentOS 5
On 06 November 2007 , John R Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: indeed. in some filename/directory standard or another who's name escapes me, /opt is the standard place to install non-core distribution software packages ... linux people often use /usr/local for this, but /usr/local is intended for site specific stuff, which software packages really aren't. John: Thank you for the above explanation! As I just wrote, I made that mistake about 2 1/2 years ago. I will change it, from /opt to /win and hopefully won't repeat that same mistake! -- Lanny - Over 800 Magazine titles up to 85% off http://lowcostmagazines.com/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] question about backup regimens
Bacula is probably the most advanced backup tools: multi-server, multi-back-device... Run on windows, linux and under GPL. Packages available for mainstream distribution. Not easy to use nor configure, but arkeia, arcserver ... are no easy too ! On Nov 8, 2007 3:54 PM, Marty Landman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I need to recommend some backup options for a web server running CentOS 4.1. The client prefers using a tape drive as their backup device and has access to safe offsite storage. I was thinking of system backups weekly and differential backups nightly but don't know what software to recommend for the differential b/u's. For full backups I can just schedule a tar and compress using cron. Any recommendations would be appreciated. Marty -- Marty Landman, Face 2 Interface Inc. 845-679-9387 Drupal Development Blog: http://drupal.face2interface.com/ Free Database Search App: http://face2interface.com/Products/FormATable.shtml ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Alain Spineux aspineux gmail com May the sources be with you ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] status of Centos 5.1?
Akemi Yagi wrote: On Nov 8, 2007 1:12 AM, Rainer Traut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, now that EL5.1 is out the big question is when will Centos 5.1 be out. I know the answer, when it's ready. According to KB, the target is in a couple of weeks. By the way, there are answers to that question other than when it's ready : http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=11128forum=37 But how is status of the problems described here? http://www.karan.org/blog/index.php/2007/10/29/so_when_is_5_1_due Thx Rainer ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Does this also mean that the CentOS 5 IA64 port will now be CentOS 5.1 IA64 instead? I'm still waiting on this and am hoping it will be ready soon. I'm planning a migration from OpenSuse 10.0 to CentOS 5 this December if possible. -- James A. Peltier Technical Director, RHCE SCIRF | GrUVi @ Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus Phone : 778-782-3610 Fax : 778-782-3045 Mobile : 778-840-6434 E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website : http://gruvi.cs.sfu.ca | http://scirf.cs.sfu.ca MSN : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Taking file from pyhsical disk to new virtual disk
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 19:41 +0200, Alain Spineux wrote: On 10/24/07, Jerry Geis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I am playing with virtualization on centos 5. I have an old redhat 7 system I still need so I want to virtualize it. I found the old disk, installed in the virtual environment but found I had done some additions WAY back. I want to be sure my virtual system is exactly the same as the ACTUAL system. Do I use cpio on the actual system to grab everything and then put that back on the virtual system? I'm more tar adept ! Here is the tar command : snip cpio require you to use a filesysteme walker like find to generate the list of file you wan to copy. FYI: the list of files/dirs to be copied can be in a file too. Allows utils like comm or diff to be used for various paring/augmenting operations before/after the copy. Something like : # find . | cpio | (cd /dst ; cpio ??? ) No need for the pipe/sub-shell with cpio. It is fully featured. However, with fully featured comes the need to RTFM and carefully think about it... sometimes. A simple case used to be (I haven't kept abreast of all the enhancements) find . | cpio -pother options destination-dir snip Is there a better way? Not IMHO. Jerry snip sig stuff HTH -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] question about backup regimens
I need to recommend some backup options for a web server running CentOS 4.1. The client prefers using a tape drive as their backup device and has access to safe offsite storage. I was thinking of system backups weekly and differential backups nightly but don't know what software to recommend for the differential b/u's. For full backups I can just schedule a tar and compress using cron. Any recommendations would be appreciated. for me www.amanda.org everytime ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] status of Centos 5.1?
Stephen John Smoogen wrote: Does this also mean that the CentOS 5 IA64 port will now be CentOS 5.1 IA64 instead? I am not sure what you mean by CentOS-5 IA64 port being 5.1 ??? All Arch releases follow the same update / rebuild cycle. Anyway, once we get the release out - the updates on IA64 will track i386/x86_64 very closely ( prolly in sync ). This does depend on hardware availability. At the moment we have 2 cores churning out the _entire_ IA64 stuff. And we dont really have failover capability. So if someone has IA64 h/w around that they want to donate, it would be much welcome. I do not think that the IA64 port will be out by December. I am not sure if there is a core developer who can work on IA64 fulltime to deal with all the headaches that keep showing up. [IA64 seems to be the Alpha architecture of today..] err ? There will be a 5.1 IA64 release within 2 to 3 weeks of i686/x86_64 going out to the mirrors. We have IA64 availability within the buildsystem and tracking buildqueues. I am saying 2 to 3 weeks, just so we get the bandwidth to test this thing a bit. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] status of Centos 5.1?
On Nov 8, 2007 9:10 AM, James A. Peltier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Akemi Yagi wrote: On Nov 8, 2007 1:12 AM, Rainer Traut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, now that EL5.1 is out the big question is when will Centos 5.1 be out. I know the answer, when it's ready. According to KB, the target is in a couple of weeks. By the way, there are answers to that question other than when it's ready : http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=11128forum=37 But how is status of the problems described here? http://www.karan.org/blog/index.php/2007/10/29/so_when_is_5_1_due Thx Rainer ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Does this also mean that the CentOS 5 IA64 port will now be CentOS 5.1 IA64 instead? I'm still waiting on this and am hoping it will be ready soon. I'm planning a migration from OpenSuse 10.0 to CentOS 5 this December if possible. I do not think that the IA64 port will be out by December. I am not sure if there is a core developer who can work on IA64 fulltime to deal with all the headaches that keep showing up. [IA64 seems to be the Alpha architecture of today..] -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. The Merchant of Venice ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Centos 5 - Install Hangup
I get to where the installation begins copying packages to the new host and it's time to change CD's to the second one. I get the following message: An error occurred unmounting the CD... make sure you're not accessing /mnt/source from the shell on tty2...click Ok to retry. I click and nothing changes. I go to tty2 and see the #ssh prompt and see nothing interfering (and the umount command doesn't work under the shell). I've tried this three times and can't get past this point. It may be a hardware problem, but other things work on the same system under Fedora 7. BTW, old AMD dual CPU, Gigabyte server MOBO, 1.5 Gb RAM, WD IDE drive, generic IDE CD-RW. ATI Raden graphics card. Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks. -Tom Tom Browder Niceville, Florida USA ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] question about backup regimens
Mark Snyder wrote: Tom Brown wrote: I need to recommend some backup options for a web server running CentOS 4.1. The client prefers using a tape drive as their backup device and has access to safe offsite storage. I was thinking of system backups weekly and differential backups nightly but don't know what software to recommend for the differential b/u's. For full backups I can just schedule a tar and compress using cron. Any recommendations would be appreciated. for me www.amanda.org everytime I've used amanda for a number of years without a hitch. Simple to implement. Depending on how you set it up, an amanda tape can be restored using only native OS tools. Centos has amanda rpms, but I prefer to built it from tarball. Can also backup to disk (virtual tape) and tape raid. -- Toby Bluhm Midwest Instruments Inc. 30825 Aurora Road Suite 100 Solon Ohio 44139 440-424-2240 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Screensave issue in Centos 4.5
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 06:40:16 -0500 fred smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Doubt it. Office closed at night. I've got (luckily) my own office. I'm often the first person there, but it'a always like this. Minor earthquake? Street sweeper, perhaps? You could eliminate this as the cause by unplugging your mouse tonight when you go home and see what it looks like in the morning. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] question about backup regimens
Toby Bluhm wrote: Mark Snyder wrote: Tom Brown wrote: Reply was meant for Tom Brown's message, not Mark Snyder's . . . . -- Toby Bluhm Midwest Instruments Inc. 30825 Aurora Road Suite 100 Solon Ohio 44139 440-424-2240 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] LD_ASSUME_KERNEL library issues CentOS 5 x86_64
I'm trying to get the Syspro/Encore MRP software running on a new CentOS 5 x86_64 system which uses an ODBC package built with old glibc/errno libraries. I have this same software running on a Suse Linux Enterprise 9 SP3 system using LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1, but when I try this on CentOS 5 it results in many unidentified libraries including libc.so.6, librt... etc. My guess is that there are packages that support these compatibility libraries, and, silly me, I thought these might be in the compat-glibc package, but that doesn't work. Any suggestions? Bill -- INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX:(206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 If you make yourselves sheep, the wolves will eat you -- Benjamin Franklin ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] status of Centos 5.1?
Karanbir Singh wrote: Stephen John Smoogen wrote: I am not sure what you mean by CentOS-5 IA64 port being 5.1 ??? All Arch releases follow the same update / rebuild cycle. This was more a question of whether the CentOS 5.0 build would just be skipped in place of a 5.1 build since there has not yet been a CentOS 5.0 build for IA64 released yet. So with that said All Arch releases follow the same update / rebuild cycle isn't really all that accurate. :) Anyway, once we get the release out - the updates on IA64 will track i386/x86_64 very closely ( prolly in sync ). This does depend on hardware availability. At the moment we have 2 cores churning out the _entire_ IA64 stuff. And we dont really have failover capability. So if someone has IA64 h/w around that they want to donate, it would be much welcome. Trust me, if my SGI Altix machines weren't being used right now to do real work I would happily allow you to build on them. I'm sure that 96 processors and 96GB of memory could be of some use. If there is a way that they could be I would be happy to schedule my own time on them to help out. err ? There will be a 5.1 IA64 release within 2 to 3 weeks of i686/x86_64 going out to the mirrors. We have IA64 availability within the buildsystem and tracking buildqueues. I am saying 2 to 3 weeks, just so we get the bandwidth to test this thing a bit. No problems, and if I can help out in any way please don't hesitate to contact me off list. -- James A. Peltier Technical Director, RHCE SCIRF | GrUVi @ Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus Phone : 778-782-3610 Fax : 778-782-3045 Mobile : 778-840-6434 E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website : http://gruvi.cs.sfu.ca | http://scirf.cs.sfu.ca MSN : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Postfix dying
Christopher Chan wrote: Paul Norton wrote: Postfix is dying on one of my servers almost nightly. This system is running CentOS5 with postfix-2.3.3-2. In the morning (after noticing it died) I try to run `service postfix stop` and I get a failed start. Running `ps ax | grep postfix` I can see one process still running for postfix. After killing this, I am able to run `service postfix start`. Which process is it? smtpd? master? Master -- Paul Norton Systems Administrator Neoverve - www.neoverve.com Neoverve Blog - http://blog.neoverve.com/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] question about backup regimens
Tom Brown wrote: I need to recommend some backup options for a web server running CentOS 4.1. The client prefers using a tape drive as their backup device and has access to safe offsite storage. I was thinking of system backups weekly and differential backups nightly but don't know what software to recommend for the differential b/u's. For full backups I can just schedule a tar and compress using cron. Any recommendations would be appreciated. for me www.amanda.org everytime ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos A commercial software option we have been using with very good success for several years now is Lone Star at http://www.cactus.com/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] question about backup regimens
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007, Marty Landman wrote: I need to recommend some backup options for a web server running CentOS 4.1. The client prefers using a tape drive as their backup device and has access to safe offsite storage. I was thinking of system backups weekly and differential backups nightly but don't know what software to recommend for the differential b/u's. For full backups I can just schedule a tar and compress using cron. Any recommendations would be appreciated. There are a couple threads on this list from earlier in the year you might find helpful: * Tape Drive Recommendations http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-March/thread.html#77709 * Help with backups http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-August/thread.html#85292 -- Paul Heinlein [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.madboa.com/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch
On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 04:47 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: David Hrbác wrote: Michael Rock napsal(a): snip I'd like to point that I'm trying my best and it takes long time, even that I have dual xeon and dual opteron machines. I have to build about 12 kernel RPMS, prepare DVD content, run buildinstall, make isos, run makedeltaiso, and etc. It really takes very long time, not my time but machine time. Regards, David David, WELCOME TO MY WORLD :D (Hey, are the new foobar packages done, how about the xwyz packages) More importantly, is there a release date for the foobar-2.0 which includes the backports currently in alpha in the upstream's 2nd release from now? I really need those as I bought a new mobo that has the latest prrrth chipset that I want to run my enterprise server on... we bought it and it's in-house now awaiting an OS with these updates. We anticipate it should be stable for 5 years or so. Thanks, JOhnny Hughes snip sig stuff after Johnny-5 -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] status of Centos 5.1?
On Nov 8, 2007 10:28 AM, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stephen John Smoogen wrote: Does this also mean that the CentOS 5 IA64 port will now be CentOS 5.1 IA64 instead? I am not sure what you mean by CentOS-5 IA64 port being 5.1 ??? All Arch releases follow the same update / rebuild cycle. I am very sorry.. but for some reason my brain and my fingers are not connected... I kept reading IA64 as PPC and was thus talking out my ass. My apologies. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. The Merchant of Venice ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] status of Centos 5.1?
James A. Peltier wrote: Karanbir Singh wrote: Stephen John Smoogen wrote: I am not sure what you mean by CentOS-5 IA64 port being 5.1 ??? All Arch releases follow the same update / rebuild cycle. This was more a question of whether the CentOS 5.0 build would just be skipped in place of a 5.1 build since there has not yet been a CentOS 5.0 build for IA64 released yet. So with that said All Arch releases follow the same update / rebuild cycle isn't really all that accurate. :) well, IA64 isnt released yet, thats why I said releases... but, having said that - yes, all packages built anywhere since 5.0 will also be made available for IA64. Prolly head straight into vault. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] HP DL585 - CentOS4.5 - kix woes
As it turns out, I did this for 4.2, instead of 4.5...but here are my notes from when I did it: (It is geared toward IBM of course, but the steps would be the same..) Grab driver disk (.iso)from: http://www-304.ibm.com/jct01004c/systems/support/supportsite.wss/docdisp lay?lndocid=MIGR-5070766brandind=508 Copy bnx2-1.4.43b*dd.img to a linux box in /tmp Put the initrd from your kickstart in /tmp/centos-custom-initrd.img As root, run these commands: cd /tmp mkdir ibmdd mkdir custom-initrd mount -oloop bnx2-1.4.43b*dd.img /tmp/ibmdd -now mount centOS's initrd file: mount -oloop centos-custom-initrd.img /tmp/custom-initrd -now extract the driver from IBM's driverdisk: cd /tmp/ibmdd/modules mkdir temp cp modules.cgz temp/mod.gz cd temp gzip -d mod.gz cat mod | cpio -idv -now extract the modules from RedHat's initrd (not enough room on the mounted initrd for this): mkdir /tmp/rhtmp cp /tmp/custom-initrd/modules/modules.cgz /tmp/rhtmp/rh.gz cd /tmp/rhtmp gzip -d rh.gz cat rh | cpio -idv -now insert the driver from the IBM driver disk into the extracted RH initrd: cd /tmp/rhtmp/2.6.9-22.EL/i686 cp /tmp/ibmdd/modules/2.6.9-5.EL/i686/bnx2.ko . -Now recreate the modules.cgz file for the RedHat initrd: cd /tmp/rhtmp rm -f rh find . | cpio -o -H crc | gzip modules.cgz -Now put that back onto the CentOS initrd: mv modules.cgz /tmp/rhinitrd/modules -We now need to tell Redhat which devices the new driver is good for, so update the follow files: cd /tmp/ibmdd tail -3 modinfo /tmp/custom-initrd/modules/module-info cat pcitable /tmp/rhinitrd/modules/pcitable NOTE: the pcitable file appears to be in numeric order (hex), dunno if it is essential, so just make sure your updates go in in order. watch for tabs vs spaces in that file. thats about it, just umount the /tmp/rhinitrd and you should be good to go: umount /tmp/custom-initrd thanks for this - alas for me it still gives me the same issue during the kix namely 'no network cards available for kickstart' or words to that effect. it seems crazy to me that HP have shipped kit that RedHat appears to not see out of the box. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Installing skype in CentOS 5
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 13:06 -0800, James A. Peltier wrote: Andrew Allen wrote: Having just upgraded my system from CentOS 4.4 to 5.0, I'm a bit disappointed that I still can't install skype from the skype repo using yum - when I try yum install skype, I end up with: libsigc++20-2.0.17-1.el5. 100% |=| 217 kB 00:13 --- Package libsigc++20.i386 0:2.0.17-1.el5.rf set to be updated -- Running transaction check -- Processing Dependency: qt4-x11 = 4.2 for package: skype -- Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: qt4-x11 = 4.2 is needed by package skype Any ideas please as to how this can be overcome so that I can install and run this very useful utility? Andy I had a hell of a time getting this to work. I ended up installing the older version of skype (1.3.0.53). As far as usefulness goes, you may want to look at alternatives such as Ekiga, which are free, cross platform and use open standards. It's far less useful when it has had the video guts ripped out of it (which the GNU/Linux client does not support video). Ekiga is in CentOS 5 base. Thanks, Actually Ekiga is already installed in my CentOS 5 system - one question though - can I communicate with skype users via Ekiga? Andy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] status of Centos 5.1?
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 12:13:38PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] enlightened us: On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 09:38:11 -0800 James A. Peltier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This was more a question of whether the CentOS 5.0 build would just be skipped in place of a 5.1 build since there has not yet been a CentOS 5.0 build for IA64 released yet. So with that said All Arch releases follow the same update / rebuild cycle isn't really all that accurate. :) This is somewhat related to the status of 5.1. Is 5.1 identical to 5.0 + all the yum updates? or is there some extra stuff? or almost the same... http://www.centos.org/modules/smartfaq/faq.php?faqid=34 -- Matt Hyclak Department of Mathematics Department of Social Work Ohio University (740) 593-1263 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Oracle Instant Client 11g on CentOS 5 (32-bit) workaround
Paul Heinlein wrote: It'd be something to the effect of semanage fcontext -a -t textrel_shlib_t \ /usr/lib/oracle/11.1.0.1/client/lib/.*\.so.* or, less version-specific, semanage fcontext -a -t textrel_shlib_t \ /usr/lib/oracle/[0-9.]*/client/lib/.*\.so.* Double-plus good! That works a treat, and even takes care of the cases where I install some of the other related packages (devel, odbc, jdbc) after-the-fact. That one goes in the notebook! -- Jay Leafey - Memphis, TN [EMAIL PROTECTED] smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 5 - Install Hangup
On Nov 8, 2007 12:32 PM, Thom Paine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you able to install via NFS from a laptop or anything? Thanks, Thom, is, I'll try it. It didn't even cross my mind since I've always been able to use a CD in YG/RH/FC/F installation. I'll report back soon. -Tom Tom Browder Niceville, Florida USA ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Oracle Instant Client 11g on CentOS 5 (32-bit) workaround
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007, Jay Leafey wrote:
I downloaded the RPMs from the Oracle web site (otn.oracle.com) and
successfully installed them on my C5 box, but the sqlplus client
software would not run properly. After a few iterations with
sealert, I finally got a handle on what was happening.
It turns out that most of the shared libraries Oracle installs need
to have their SElinux file context modified to allow relocation.
Here's the quick-and-dirty routine I use to repair this:
find /usr/lib/oracle/11.1.0.1/client/lib -type f -name \*.so\* \
-exec chcon -t textrel_shlib_t {} \;
Obviously you could get around this by disabling SElinux, but I
really want to avoid that if possible.
Now a quick question: does anybody know if there is any way to
configure SElinux so that the context for these files won't be
fixed by a restorecon operation on this directory?
It'd be something to the effect of
semanage fcontext -a -t textrel_shlib_t \
/usr/lib/oracle/11.1.0.1/client/lib/.*\.so.*
or, less version-specific,
semanage fcontext -a -t textrel_shlib_t \
/usr/lib/oracle/[0-9.]*/client/lib/.*\.so.*
--
Paul Heinlein [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.madboa.com/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Oracle Instant Client 11g on CentOS 5 (32-bit) workaround
I downloaded the RPMs from the Oracle web site (otn.oracle.com) and
successfully installed them on my C5 box, but the sqlplus client
software would not run properly. After a few iterations with sealert, I
finally got a handle on what was happening.
It turns out that most of the shared libraries Oracle installs need to
have their SElinux file context modified to allow relocation. Here's
the quick-and-dirty routine I use to repair this:
find /usr/lib/oracle/11.1.0.1/client/lib -type f -name \*.so\* \
-exec chcon -t textrel_shlib_t {} \;
Obviously you could get around this by disabling SElinux, but I really
want to avoid that if possible.
Now a quick question: does anybody know if there is any way to
configure SElinux so that the context for these files won't be fixed
by a restorecon operation on this directory?
Thanks!
--
Jay Leafey - Memphis, TN
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Installing skype in CentOS 5
Andrew Allen wrote: Thanks, Actually Ekiga is already installed in my CentOS 5 system - one question though - can I communicate with skype users via Ekiga? Andy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos I have not tried myself, personally, I recommend users move away from skype because of it's proprietary nature, and many of them have so it's been a non-issue for me. ;) -- James A. Peltier Technical Director, RHCE SCIRF | GrUVi @ Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus Phone : 778-782-3610 Fax : 778-782-3045 Mobile : 778-840-6434 E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website : http://gruvi.cs.sfu.ca | http://scirf.cs.sfu.ca MSN : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] status of Centos 5.1?
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 09:38:11 -0800 James A. Peltier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This was more a question of whether the CentOS 5.0 build would just be skipped in place of a 5.1 build since there has not yet been a CentOS 5.0 build for IA64 released yet. So with that said All Arch releases follow the same update / rebuild cycle isn't really all that accurate. :) This is somewhat related to the status of 5.1. Is 5.1 identical to 5.0 + all the yum updates? or is there some extra stuff? or almost the same... -- Thanks http://www.911networks.com When the network has to work ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] question about backup regimens
Marty Landman wrote: I need to recommend some backup options for a web server running CentOS 4.1. The client prefers using a tape drive as their backup device and has access to safe offsite storage. I was thinking of system backups weekly and differential backups nightly but don't know what software to recommend for the differential b/u's. For full backups I can just schedule a tar and compress using cron. Any recommendations would be appreciated. Marty if the website uses some sort of sql database, and your backup software isn't explicitly database aware, remember to dump the database and backup the dump rather than the raw DB files... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Help with sound on Packard bell
Hello to everyone I had a little trouble with my new laptop, I have a Packard Bell MZ380 laptop with Realtek High Definition Audio, I have installed CentOS 5 on it, I have sound by the speaker but when I plug the headphone the sound is over, I mean I have not sound by the speaker and by the headphones. Can someone help me? What I have to do I'll be waiting for help. -- Nuestra recompensa se encuentra en el esfuerzo y no en el resultado. Un esfuerzo total es una victoria completa. Mahatma Gandhi (@ @) |--o00o-(_)-o00o--| |Manuel Enrique Chávez Manzano| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | |GNU/LINUX User | |#424754 | |Using CentOS 5 | |---ooo--ooo--| signature.asc Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.0 - Yum install using the install cd's as the RPM source
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 10:51 -0800, Mark Pryor wrote: Keith, --- Keith Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the mechanism or procedure for installing additional packages from the six CentOS 5.0 CD's using Yum, assuming a secured server with no outside internet connection? snip Checkout the file /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Media.repo there are several pre-set mount points for your ISO mounts. For my DVD I use /mnt/repo I see above you have the right mount for an ISO. Then to point YUM to your media repo use #yum install SomeRPM --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=c5-media if you want to ban external access, the disablerepo token is the key. IIRC, it's not that simple with the 6 CDs. Search the CentOS forums/lists (google site:centos.org argument IIRC). ISTM that you need to combine the CDs into a single image. If so, and network capacity/cost is not an issue, it might be better to download the DVD image and then loop mount it. Then all works as Mark wrote. All this from hazy memory remaining after months of extensive work hours, so there may be mis-info here, but I hope not. HTH -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cheap dual-head pci card with CentOS support?
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007, mbneto wrote: Hi, I am looking for a cheap PCI (or AGP) video card with dual output (DVI or VGA) and CentOS support. Any recommendations? I am not interested in games. Thanks. Not sure what you consider cheap, but I've had great success with the NVidia Quadro FX 3450/3500 series. Scott ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cheap dual-head pci card with CentOS support?
mbneto wrote: Hi, I am looking for a cheap PCI (or AGP) video card with dual output (DVI or VGA) and CentOS support. Any recommendations? I am not interested in games. Thanks. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Matrox. -- James A. Peltier Technical Director, RHCE SCIRF | GrUVi @ Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus Phone : 778-782-3610 Fax : 778-782-3045 Mobile : 778-840-6434 E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website : http://gruvi.cs.sfu.ca | http://scirf.cs.sfu.ca MSN : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Installing skype in CentOS 5
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007, Andrew Allen wrote: On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 13:06 -0800, James A. Peltier wrote: Andrew Allen wrote: Having just upgraded my system from CentOS 4.4 to 5.0, I'm a bit disappointed that I still can't install skype from the skype repo using yum - when I try yum install skype, I end up with: libsigc++20-2.0.17-1.el5. 100% |=| 217 kB 00:13 --- Package libsigc++20.i386 0:2.0.17-1.el5.rf set to be updated -- Running transaction check -- Processing Dependency: qt4-x11 = 4.2 for package: skype -- Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: qt4-x11 = 4.2 is needed by package skype Any ideas please as to how this can be overcome so that I can install and run this very useful utility? I had a hell of a time getting this to work. I ended up installing the older version of skype (1.3.0.53). As far as usefulness goes, you may want to look at alternatives such as Ekiga, which are free, cross platform and use open standards. It's far less useful when it has had the video guts ripped out of it (which the GNU/Linux client does not support video). Ekiga is in CentOS 5 base. Thanks, Actually Ekiga is already installed in my CentOS 5 system - one question though - can I communicate with skype users via Ekiga? How about using the Beta skype at: http://www.skype.com/intl/en/download/skype/linux/beta/choose/ The offer a package specially made for CentOS and you only require qt4. I installed it without any problems. Haven't tested the video-stuff yet though :/ -- -- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Postfix dying
Paul Norton wrote: Christopher Chan wrote: Paul Norton wrote: Postfix is dying on one of my servers almost nightly. This system is running CentOS5 with postfix-2.3.3-2. In the morning (after noticing it died) I try to run `service postfix stop` and I get a failed start. Running `ps ax | grep postfix` I can see one process still running for postfix. After killing this, I am able to run `service postfix start`. Which process is it? smtpd? master? Master Do you sometimes find anvil missing? I wonder if you can strace master and see what it is doing or waiting for... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Centos5 install failure
On 2007-11-07, Christopher Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any clues what I did wrong? Yes. You placed the kernel on an LVM (grub does not support LVM...at least not LVM2 IIRC) and then come to this list where grub and lilo users like me are subscribers. Don't complain about grub. grub gives you far more power than that piece of trash called lilo. No; the kernel was in a separate /boot filesystem formated ext3. This was set up by anaconda during the installation. Any other ideas? -- John ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Centos5 install failure
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:12:33PM -0600, John Thompson alleged: On 2007-11-07, Christopher Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any clues what I did wrong? Yes. You placed the kernel on an LVM (grub does not support LVM...at least not LVM2 IIRC) and then come to this list where grub and lilo users like me are subscribers. Don't complain about grub. grub gives you far more power than that piece of trash called lilo. No; the kernel was in a separate /boot filesystem formated ext3. This was set up by anaconda during the installation. Any other ideas? I think your problem could happen if you installed the boot loader into the active partition and there is a stale boot loader in the mbr. pgpFD73R5X1CO.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cheap dual-head pci card with CentOS support?
mbneto wrote: Hi, I am looking for a cheap PCI (or AGP) video card with dual output (DVI or VGA) and CentOS support. nvidia x200yy for x=6,7 and yy=GS or whatever is cheapest. probably will have one each VGA + DVI, usable concurrently. will easily support 2 x 1600 x 1200 x 32bit at high refresh rate ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Centos5 install failure
Garrick Staples wrote: On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:12:33PM -0600, John Thompson alleged: On 2007-11-07, Christopher Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any clues what I did wrong? Yes. You placed the kernel on an LVM (grub does not support LVM...at least not LVM2 IIRC) and then come to this list where grub and lilo users like me are subscribers. Don't complain about grub. grub gives you far more power than that piece of trash called lilo. No; the kernel was in a separate /boot filesystem formated ext3. This was set up by anaconda during the installation. Any other ideas? I think your problem could happen if you installed the boot loader into the active partition and there is a stale boot loader in the mbr. I don't know...he did say that he restored lilo to get his FC1 installation working again. grub should not have problems picking up its second stage unless it rests beyond the 1024 cylinder and there is no LBA support. That leads to the question, where is the partition for the /boot for the Centos5 kernels located and is there LBA support in the BIOS? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Centos5 install failure
That leads to the question, where is the partition for the /boot for the Centos5 kernels located and is there LBA support in the BIOS? should have been: where is the partition for the /boot filesystem that holds the centos5 kernels located... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cheap dual-head pci card with CentOS support?
Currently I'm using an NV34(Geforce FX 5500). It's a PCI card, and it has both SVGA and DVI outputs. I don't know if both outputs will work at once, but I don't see why not. The card is working fine for me. Sorry, but I don't have a second one to sell, but that should give you a starting point. Jim On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 20:18 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: mbneto wrote: Hi, I am looking for a cheap PCI (or AGP) video card with dual output (DVI or VGA) and CentOS support. nvidia x200yy for x=6,7 and yy=GS or whatever is cheapest. probably will have one each VGA + DVI, usable concurrently. will easily support 2 x 1600 x 1200 x 32bit at high refresh rate ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS 5: comment swap in fstab
I'm not sure what gave me this idea, but I decided to comment out the swap partition in /etc/fstab and reboot my laptop. I did not run swapoff directly at any time. I'm running more things now than I would ever dream of to hammer my 500MB of memory, but I still notice NO slowdown. This is the best desktop experience I've ever had for any OS on any hardware! Here's the first 12 lines in top (CPU) top - 22:57:28 up 2:06, 1 user, load average: 1.11, 0.89, 0.88 Tasks: 97 total, 2 running, 95 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 20.2%us, 2.9%sy, 0.0%ni, 76.2%id, 0.0%wa, 0.1%hi, 0.6%si, 0.0%st Mem:449556k total, 441840k used, 7716k free, 9420k buffers Swap:0k total,0k used,0k free, 159416k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND 2921 root 15 0 227m 69m 7312 S 16.2 15.9 22:41.70 X 3317 finley15 0 240m 25m 8684 S 3.1 5.8 2:32.73 xine 3204 finley15 0 2160 772 564 S 2.2 0.2 2:02.71 top 3100 finley15 0 183m 51m 16m S 0.8 11.7 5:03.90 firefox-bin 3116 finley15 0 223m 39m 2440 S 0.4 8.9 0:54.26 java_vm 3264 finley15 0 32276 9788 7132 S 0.3 2.2 0:23.74 kpat 3050 finley15 0 33676 10m 7572 R 0.2 2.3 0:21.28 konsole 3049 finley15 0 32080 7620 5668 S 0.1 1.7 0:01.62 kscd 3399 finley15 0 57024 25m 16m S 0.1 5.7 0:08.55 konqueror 1 root 15 0 2028 480 392 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.29 init 2 root RT 0 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/0 3 root 34 19 000 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.06 ksoftirqd/0 Here's the top 12 lines (Mem) top - 22:58:41 up 2:07, 1 user, load average: 1.14, 0.92, 0.89 Tasks: 97 total, 3 running, 94 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 25.3%us, 2.9%sy, 0.0%ni, 71.5%id, 0.0%wa, 0.4%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st Mem:449556k total, 442156k used, 7400k free, 9648k buffers Swap:0k total,0k used,0k free, 159160k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND 2921 root 16 0 227m 69m 7312 R 20.9 15.9 22:55.56 X 3100 finley15 0 183m 51m 16m S 0.4 11.7 5:05.54 firefox-bin 3116 finley15 0 223m 39m 2440 S 0.4 8.9 0:54.60 java_vm 3253 finley15 0 198m 34m 9.8m S 0.0 7.9 0:07.97 swriter.bin 3317 finley15 0 240m 25m 8684 S 2.9 5.8 2:35.17 xine 3399 finley15 0 57024 25m 16m S 0.0 5.7 0:08.57 konqueror 3638 finley15 0 93632 23m 15m S 0.0 5.4 0:03.80 gaim 3026 finley15 0 35180 13m 10m S 0.0 3.1 0:05.42 kded 3336 finley15 0 34232 11m 8776 S 0.0 2.7 1:01.01 kuickshow 3038 finley15 0 35096 11m 8828 S 0.0 2.7 0:23.91 kicker 3050 finley15 0 33676 10m 7844 R 0.4 2.4 0:21.53 konsole 3264 finley15 0 32276 9808 7152 S 0.0 2.2 0:23.85 kpat As you can see, I'm running a KDE environment. I'm going to try this in a gnome environment tomorrow. This is on an HP Pavillion ze4800 I purchased at WalMart a bit over two years ago for ~$900. From dmesg: AMD mobile AMD Athlon(tm) XP2800+ Memory: 447836k/457664k available Linux info: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ cat /etc/issue CentOS release 5 (Final) Kernel \r on an \m [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a Linux c182.pnd.net 2.6.18-8.1.6.el5 #1 SMP Thu Jun 14 17:46:09 EDT 2007 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux Hope this makes someone else's day! Steve Finley ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5: comment swap in fstab
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not sure what gave me this idea, but I decided to comment out the swap partition in /etc/fstab and reboot my laptop. I did not run swapoff directly at any time. I'm running more things now than I would ever dream of to hammer my 500MB of memory, but I still notice NO slowdown. This is the best desktop experience I've ever had for any OS on any hardware! Er...you won't experience any slowdown...you would experience killed app. Mem:449556k total, 442156k used, 7400k free, 9648k buffers Swap:0k total,0k used,0k free, 159160k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND 2921 root 16 0 227m 69m 7312 R 20.9 15.9 22:55.56 X 3100 finley15 0 183m 51m 16m S 0.4 11.7 5:05.54 firefox-bin 3116 finley15 0 223m 39m 2440 S 0.4 8.9 0:54.60 java_vm 3253 finley15 0 198m 34m 9.8m S 0.0 7.9 0:07.97 swriter.bin 3317 finley15 0 240m 25m 8684 S 2.9 5.8 2:35.17 xine 3399 finley15 0 57024 25m 16m S 0.0 5.7 0:08.57 konqueror 3638 finley15 0 93632 23m 15m S 0.0 5.4 0:03.80 gaim As you can see, I'm running a KDE environment. I'm going to try this in a gnome environment tomorrow. ...Interesting, the numbers do not add up...I wonder what happens as you visit more websites with firefox...and if you also run thunderbird at the same time... Maybe you should stick to konqueror and kmail... Hope this makes someone else's day! My apologies if I burst any bubbles :-D ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] ISDN on CentOS
Hi Folks, I'm using ISDN-Connections extensively because ADSL is not available. So far it works fine out of the box (CentOS 5 PAE). Two questions: 1. for which the fcpci-kernel-modules from atrpm-Repo are useful? 2. Whats about channel bundling? Does CentOS bundling automaticly on every established connection (if it is selected in Network-Configuration) or is it only set/unset with the isdnctrl addlink/removelink ippp0 command? Thats very important because there is no flat-rate on this ISDN-Connection. I intend the use of channel bundling only for remote-access The simple user on the connected window-workstations shall not use channel-bundling for surfing. (ISDN is on the server with samba / squid). It's difficult for me to test it because I have only remote-access to this server (start/restart of the ISDN-Connection) Thanks for any hints Timothy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
