Re: [CentOS-docs] Re: modern-CentOS-1.7-10
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Alain Reguera Delgado wrote: Thank you very much for those comments. No, thank you for your perseverance :) Also, What do you think about info messages ? would be convenient to define some styles to notes, warnings and stops messages in our wiki ? Yes, good admonition support is a definite plus for documentation ! And if it exists, I am sure more people will make use of it to polish their documents. -- -- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors] ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-docs] Wiki deuglification, last (at the moment) part
Hey, one last change maybe - with the 3% padding on top and bottom, we really lose screen estate at the top. How does it look to you without any padding at top/bottom (leaving a 10px white line there)? That's what's live on wiki-m.centos.org at the moment. Or, if all of you want to have some more space above there (and the background pattern) go with 1% padding? 1% padding means that there will be *1* line of checkered boxes over the white space over the header ... [insert personal opinion: 1% padding looks better, IMHO, but other people seem to like the 0% padding instead.] Other than that, I'd like to call this the Final Version for now, with which I'd like to go live on the real wiki before 5.1/4.6 hit the mirrors. That doesn't mean that we won't improve the design any further, but I'd like to show some progress to the outside (release early, release often) ... Cheers, Ralph pgpFJrg3suFQM.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Wiki deuglification, last (at the moment) part
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Ralph Angenendt wrote: Hey, one last change maybe - with the 3% padding on top and bottom, we really lose screen estate at the top. How does it look to you without any padding at top/bottom (leaving a 10px white line there)? That's what's live on wiki-m.centos.org at the moment. Looks fine - I would do the same at the sides as well. Lance -- uklinux.net - The ISP of choice for the discerning Linux user. ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Wiki deuglification, last (at the moment) part
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Ralph Angenendt wrote: one last change maybe - with the 3% padding on top and bottom, we really lose screen estate at the top. How does it look to you without any padding at top/bottom (leaving a 10px white line there)? That's what's live on wiki-m.centos.org at the moment. Or, if all of you want to have some more space above there (and the background pattern) go with 1% padding? 1% padding means that there will be *1* line of checkered boxes over the white space over the header ... [insert personal opinion: 1% padding looks better, IMHO, but other people seem to like the 0% padding instead.] Other than that, I'd like to call this the Final Version for now, with which I'd like to go live on the real wiki before 5.1/4.6 hit the mirrors. That doesn't mean that we won't improve the design any further, but I'd like to show some progress to the outside (release early, release often) ... I would bring it live right now and do the optimisations later. There is no need to get clearance of those things if most people already condoned most of the meat :) -- -- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors] ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Wiki deuglification, last (at the moment) part
On Nov 21, 2007 6:31 PM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: one last change maybe - with the 3% padding on top and bottom, we really lose screen estate at the top. How does it look to you without any padding at top/bottom (leaving a 10px white line there)? That's what's live on wiki-m.centos.org at the moment. Or, if all of you want to have some more space above there (and the background pattern) go with 1% padding? 1% padding means that there will be *1* line of checkered boxes over the white space over the header ... [insert personal opinion: 1% padding looks better, IMHO, but other people seem to like the 0% padding instead.] Other than that, I'd like to call this the Final Version for now, with which I'd like to go live on the real wiki before 5.1/4.6 hit the mirrors. You have a go for me. Let's get this online. It is already a great improvement over the current one. And it would be great to get this going before the 5.1 release. That doesn't mean that we won't improve the design any further, but I'd like to show some progress to the outside (release early, release often) ... Indeed, finetuning can be done over the coming days and weeks. Regards, Tim -- Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83 Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed. (Linus Torvalds) ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Wiki deuglification, last (at the moment) part
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 17:36 +, Lance Davis wrote: On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Ralph Angenendt wrote: Hey, one last change maybe - with the 3% padding on top and bottom, we really lose screen estate at the top. How does it look to you without any padding at top/bottom (leaving a 10px white line there)? That's what's live on wiki-m.centos.org at the moment. Looks fine - I would do the same at the sides as well. I am not sure. It is known from studies that people can only read optimally up to a certain text width. Not that a fixed size is enforced now, but the smaller relative width it has now, improves the readability of longer texts. *If* we want to fill up the sides, I think it is better to do that with menus or some other content in the future. -- Daniel ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Wiki deuglification, last (at the moment) part
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 10:02 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Nov 21, 2007 9:31 AM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Let's go live now. Akemi I Second the opinion of going live. let this baby be the new face of the wiki. Also fine tuning is an art and takes a life time ;) ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Re: modern-CentOS-1.7-10
On Nov 21, 2007 12:25 PM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alain Reguera Delgado wrote: Hi, Thank you very much for those comments. Also, I want to note that in a 1024x768 screen some pages break navibar. For example: - http://wiki-m.centos.org/HowTos/I_need_the_Kernel_Source - http://wiki-m.centos.org/HowTos/Rotational_backup_with_remote_backup_options - http://wiki-m.centos.org/YumCheckOrInstallUpdates Could we do something to fix that ? Rename the pages, I guess. I have no other idea. Who in $deities name made up those page titles anyway? :) ... and if we cut the spaces between words ? with that we'll reduce 4 (5 if we cut the FAQ's s) characters on navibar ... maybe the ones we need ... maybe not could we test it ? another thing would be to make the page a little width wide ... but I see it a little wide already another thing would be to put FAQs, HowTos and TipsAndTricks links into a Documentation page and just show Documentation link on navibar all these have pros and cons ... what do you think ? any other idea ? Cheers, al. ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Re: modern-CentOS-1.7-10
Alain Reguera Delgado wrote: another thing would be to put FAQs, HowTos and TipsAndTricks links into a Documentation page and just show Documentation link on navibar That will happen, when we begin to restructure content. Let's live with it for the moment ... Cheers, Ralph pgpDTcrtPZRHU.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-docs] Last Change for the css
Hey,
last patch for screen.css:
--- screen.css.orig 2007-11-21 17:18:13.0 +
+++ screen.css 2007-11-21 17:22:43.0 +
@@ -13,8 +13,6 @@
*/
body {
-padding-top: 3%;
-padding-bottom: 3%;
padding-right: 10%;
padding-left: 10%;
margin: 0px;
And after that we go live!
Just joking. We already are live. See http://wiki.centos.org/.
And now, Ladies and Gentlemen, show a big round of applause for Alain!
Alain: Thank you in the name of the CentOS Team. Great work.
Cheers,
Ralph
pgpptp6Lw9QdJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Last Change for the css
On Nov 21, 2007 3:58 PM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, Just joking. We already are live. See http://wiki.centos.org/. And now, Ladies and Gentlemen, show a big round of applause for Alain! Alain: Thank you in the name of the CentOS Team. Great work. Thank you, Alain and Ralph. The CentOS wiki finally looks so professional. Akemi ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Last Change for the css
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 16:09 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Nov 21, 2007 3:58 PM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, Just joking. We already are live. See http://wiki.centos.org/. And now, Ladies and Gentlemen, show a big round of applause for Alain! Alain: Thank you in the name of the CentOS Team. Great work. Thank you, Alain and Ralph. The CentOS wiki finally looks so professional. Indeed, many thanks to both of you for making this happen! -- Daniel ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-docs] modern-CentOS-1.7-12
Hi Ralph, Could you install 1.7-12 please, it includes: - some message styles. - make body top and bottom 0px. If it can't be installed on wiki.centos.org could you give me write access on wiki-m.centos.org/ArtWork/Wiki page to show the message style proposition ? Cheers, al. ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-es] Problema extraño con Samba.
Hola estimados: Les cuento el problema que ha surgido con windows y samba en centos 5, espero me puedan ayudar: Por razones tecnicas nos vemos de migar de win 2003 a samba Todo iba bien las pruebas con maquinas que no se encontraban el el dominio en windows( la maquina se unia al dominio todo bien). Asi que decidimos probar con una mquina que estaba en el dominio windows y se genera el siguiente error: error al intertar unir al dominio x error de inicio de sesion: usuario desconocino o contraseña incorrecta. - Eso es obvio que un problema de que el root no esta agregado a samba con la respectiva clave, asi que saque al root de samba y lo volvi a agregar pero el problema continua. - Descomente unas lineas del samba.conf : - os level = 65 - wins support = yes - Guarde los cambios y reinicie el servicio pero el problema continua Es raro por que las maquinas que no estaban el dominio windows funciona bien... Asi que crei que es problema del windows de esa maquina. investige y encontre 2 cosas: cambiar el valor de la clave de registro: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\Currentcontrolset\services\netlogon\parameters requiresignorseal = dword=0001 por requiresignorseal = dword= el error continua. - Despues cambie las politicas de seguridad especificamente: Seguridad de red: Nivel autenticacion de LAN Manager Enviar LM Y NTLM por NTLMv2 si se negocia. pero el error sigue. Espero haberme explicado bien, El kernel que ocupo es: 2.6.18-8.1.15.el5, version de samba: 3.0.23c-2.el5.2.0.2 la maquina del problema es windows xp service pack 2 Gracias. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Problema extraño con Samba.
Mario Ganga wrote: Hola maximo gracias por tu atencion Con respecto a tus preguntas hiciste el smbpaswd -a root ? y le pusiste contraseña? no te dio ningun error? lo hice y no arroja ningun error. usaste root para agregar la pc al dominio? Si uso al root para unirlos al dominio, como explicaba en el correo las maquinas nuevas las que no estaban en el antiguo dominio funciona, pero en la que probe que si estaba en el antiguo me arroja el error. pregunta tonta la sacaste del dominio y la volviste a agregar al nuevo?? hiciste los mapeos de grupos? No lo he hecho, aunque ejecuto el comando: net groupmap list y no me muestra nada eso es raro deberia mostrame los grupos con su sid. en realidad los samba nuevos bienen asi tenes que hacer lo mapeos vos Atte. Mario Ganga Castro On Nov 21, 2007 10:43 AM, Maximo Mosalvo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mario Ganga wrote: Hola estimados: Les cuento el problema que ha surgido con windows y samba en centos 5, espero me puedan ayudar: Por razones tecnicas nos vemos de migar de win 2003 a samba Todo iba bien las pruebas con maquinas que no se encontraban el el dominio en windows( la maquina se unia al dominio todo bien). Asi que decidimos probar con una mquina que estaba en el dominio windows y se genera el siguiente error: error al intertar unir al dominio x error de inicio de sesion: usuario desconocino o contraseña incorrecta. - Eso es obvio que un problema de que el root no esta agregado a samba con la respectiva clave, asi que saque al root de samba y lo volvi a agregar pero el problema continua. - Descomente unas lineas del samba.conf : - os level = 65 - wins support = yes - Guarde los cambios y reinicie el servicio pero el problema continua Es raro por que las maquinas que no estaban el dominio windows funciona bien... Asi que crei que es problema del windows de esa maquina. investige y encontre 2 cosas: cambiar el valor de la clave de registro: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\Currentcontrolset\services\netlogon\parameters requiresignorseal = dword=0001 por requiresignorseal = dword= el error continua. - Despues cambie las politicas de seguridad especificamente: Seguridad de red: Nivel autenticacion de LAN Manager Enviar LM Y NTLM por NTLMv2 si se negocia. pero el error sigue. Espero haberme explicado bien, El kernel que ocupo es: 2.6.18-8.1.15.el5, version de samba: 3.0.23c-2.el5.2.0.2 la maquina del problema es windows xp service pack 2 Gracias. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es hiciste el smbpaswd -a root ? y le pusiste contraseña? no te dio ningun error? usaste root para agregar la pc al dominio? hiciste los mapeos de grupos? -- #--el- -Con linux no siempre Ganas :( Charla entra amigote y la bruja Amigote: Che asi que lo enganchaste nomas como lo convenciste la bruja: Facil me disfrace de Pinguino y acepto enceguida ;) #--- ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- #--- -Con linux no siempre Ganas :( Charla entra amigote y la bruja Amigote: Che asi que lo enganchaste nomas como lo convenciste la bruja: Facil me disfrace de Pinguino y acepto enceguida ;) #--- ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Problema extraño con Samba.
Quizas esto te ayude: http://tiki.diariolinux.com/tiki-read_article.php?articleId=18 Hola estimados: Les cuento el problema que ha surgido con windows y samba en centos 5, espero me puedan ayudar: Por razones tecnicas nos vemos de migar de win 2003 a samba Todo iba bien las pruebas con maquinas que no se encontraban el el dominio en windows( la maquina se unia al dominio todo bien). Asi que decidimos probar con una mquina que estaba en el dominio windows y se genera el siguiente error: error al intertar unir al dominio x error de inicio de sesion: usuario desconocino o contraseña incorrecta. - Eso es obvio que un problema de que el root no esta agregado a samba con la respectiva clave, asi que saque al root de samba y lo volvi a agregar pero el problema continua. - Descomente unas lineas del samba.conf : - os level = 65 - wins support = yes - Guarde los cambios y reinicie el servicio pero el problema continua Es raro por que las maquinas que no estaban el dominio windows funciona bien... Asi que crei que es problema del windows de esa maquina. investige y encontre 2 cosas: cambiar el valor de la clave de registro: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\Currentcontrolset\services\netlogon\parameters requiresignorseal = dword=0001 por requiresignorseal = dword= el error continua. - Despues cambie las politicas de seguridad especificamente: Seguridad de red: Nivel autenticacion de LAN Manager Enviar LM Y NTLM por NTLMv2 si se negocia. pero el error sigue. Espero haberme explicado bien, El kernel que ocupo es: 2.6.18-8.1.15.el5, version de samba: 3.0.23c-2.el5.2.0.2 la maquina del problema es windows xp service pack 2 Gracias. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Problema extraño con Samba.
Si estimado la saque la volvi a agregar de variasd maneras... te cuento que probe con otro server con samba el de pruebas con un cable cruzado y listo se agrego sin problemas el server de pruebas en centos 4.5 no recuerdo la version de samba... asi que hice lo suguiente tome smb.conf de centos 4.5 lo movi a centos 5.0 haciendo los cambios necesarios obviamente, eche a correr samba sin problemas... ejecute un testparm y me arroja los siguientes errores: Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf params.c:Parameter() - Ignoring badly formed line in configuration file: # This is the main Samba configuration file. You should read the params.c:Parameter() - Ignoring badly formed line in configuration file: t of which are not shown in this example Le estado preguntando a google pero nada... Atte. Mario Ganga Castro. On Nov 21, 2007 12:54 PM, Maximo Mosalvo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mario Ganga wrote: Hola maximo gracias por tu atencion Con respecto a tus preguntas hiciste el smbpaswd -a root ? y le pusiste contraseña? no te dio ningun error? lo hice y no arroja ningun error. usaste root para agregar la pc al dominio? Si uso al root para unirlos al dominio, como explicaba en el correo las maquinas nuevas las que no estaban en el antiguo dominio funciona, pero en la que probe que si estaba en el antiguo me arroja el error. pregunta tonta la sacaste del dominio y la volviste a agregar al nuevo?? hiciste los mapeos de grupos? No lo he hecho, aunque ejecuto el comando: net groupmap list y no me muestra nada eso es raro deberia mostrame los grupos con su sid. en realidad los samba nuevos bienen asi tenes que hacer lo mapeos vos Atte. Mario Ganga Castro On Nov 21, 2007 10:43 AM, Maximo Mosalvo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mario Ganga wrote: Hola estimados: Les cuento el problema que ha surgido con windows y samba en centos 5, espero me puedan ayudar: Por razones tecnicas nos vemos de migar de win 2003 a samba Todo iba bien las pruebas con maquinas que no se encontraban el el dominio en windows( la maquina se unia al dominio todo bien). Asi que decidimos probar con una mquina que estaba en el dominio windows y se genera el siguiente error: error al intertar unir al dominio x error de inicio de sesion: usuario desconocino o contraseña incorrecta. - Eso es obvio que un problema de que el root no esta agregado a samba con la respectiva clave, asi que saque al root de samba y lo volvi a agregar pero el problema continua. - Descomente unas lineas del samba.conf : - os level = 65 - wins support = yes - Guarde los cambios y reinicie el servicio pero el problema continua Es raro por que las maquinas que no estaban el dominio windows funciona bien... Asi que crei que es problema del windows de esa maquina. investige y encontre 2 cosas: cambiar el valor de la clave de registro: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\Currentcontrolset\services\netlogon\parameters requiresignorseal = dword=0001 por requiresignorseal = dword= el error continua. - Despues cambie las politicas de seguridad especificamente: Seguridad de red: Nivel autenticacion de LAN Manager Enviar LM Y NTLM por NTLMv2 si se negocia. pero el error sigue. Espero haberme explicado bien, El kernel que ocupo es: 2.6.18-8.1.15.el5, version de samba: 3.0.23c-2.el5.2.0.2 la maquina del problema es windows xp service pack 2 Gracias. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es hiciste el smbpaswd -a root ? y le pusiste contraseña? no te dio ningun error? usaste root para agregar la pc al dominio? hiciste los mapeos de grupos? -- #--el- -Con linux no siempre Ganas :( Charla entra amigote y la bruja Amigote: Che asi que lo enganchaste nomas como lo convenciste la bruja: Facil me disfrace de Pinguino y acepto enceguida ;) #--- ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- #--- -Con linux no siempre Ganas :( Charla entra amigote y la bruja Amigote: Che asi que lo enganchaste nomas como lo convenciste la bruja: Facil me disfrace de Pinguino y acepto enceguida ;)
Re: [CentOS-es] Problema extraño con Samba.
Ya solucione este error params.c:Parameter() - Ignoring badly formed line in configuration file: t of which are not shown in this example tenia una t en el archivo smb.conf fuera de los comentarios. la borre y listo ahora voy por el otro aunque ya no veo nada malo Atte. Mario Ganga Castro On Nov 21, 2007 3:33 PM, Mario Ganga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Si estimado la saque la volvi a agregar de variasd maneras... te cuento que probe con otro server con samba el de pruebas con un cable cruzado y listo se agrego sin problemas el server de pruebas en centos 4.5 no recuerdo la version de samba... asi que hice lo suguiente tome smb.conf de centos 4.5 lo movi a centos 5.0 haciendo los cambios necesarios obviamente, eche a correr samba sin problemas... ejecute un testparm y me arroja los siguientes errores: Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf params.c:Parameter() - Ignoring badly formed line in configuration file: # This is the main Samba configuration file. You should read the params.c:Parameter() - Ignoring badly formed line in configuration file: t of which are not shown in this example Le estado preguntando a google pero nada... Atte. Mario Ganga Castro. On Nov 21, 2007 12:54 PM, Maximo Mosalvo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mario Ganga wrote: Hola maximo gracias por tu atencion Con respecto a tus preguntas hiciste el smbpaswd -a root ? y le pusiste contraseña? no te dio ningun error? lo hice y no arroja ningun error. usaste root para agregar la pc al dominio? Si uso al root para unirlos al dominio, como explicaba en el correo las maquinas nuevas las que no estaban en el antiguo dominio funciona, pero en la que probe que si estaba en el antiguo me arroja el error. pregunta tonta la sacaste del dominio y la volviste a agregar al nuevo?? hiciste los mapeos de grupos? No lo he hecho, aunque ejecuto el comando: net groupmap list y no me muestra nada eso es raro deberia mostrame los grupos con su sid. en realidad los samba nuevos bienen asi tenes que hacer lo mapeos vos Atte. Mario Ganga Castro On Nov 21, 2007 10:43 AM, Maximo Mosalvo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mario Ganga wrote: Hola estimados: Les cuento el problema que ha surgido con windows y samba en centos 5, espero me puedan ayudar: Por razones tecnicas nos vemos de migar de win 2003 a samba Todo iba bien las pruebas con maquinas que no se encontraban el el dominio en windows( la maquina se unia al dominio todo bien). Asi que decidimos probar con una mquina que estaba en el dominio windows y se genera el siguiente error: error al intertar unir al dominio x error de inicio de sesion: usuario desconocino o contraseña incorrecta. - Eso es obvio que un problema de que el root no esta agregado a samba con la respectiva clave, asi que saque al root de samba y lo volvi a agregar pero el problema continua. - Descomente unas lineas del samba.conf : - os level = 65 - wins support = yes - Guarde los cambios y reinicie el servicio pero el problema continua Es raro por que las maquinas que no estaban el dominio windows funciona bien... Asi que crei que es problema del windows de esa maquina. investige y encontre 2 cosas: cambiar el valor de la clave de registro: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\Currentcontrolset\services\netlogon\parameters requiresignorseal = dword=0001 por requiresignorseal = dword= el error continua. - Despues cambie las politicas de seguridad especificamente: Seguridad de red: Nivel autenticacion de LAN Manager Enviar LM Y NTLM por NTLMv2 si se negocia. pero el error sigue. Espero haberme explicado bien, El kernel que ocupo es: 2.6.18-8.1.15.el5, version de samba: 3.0.23c-2.el5.2.0.2 la maquina del problema es windows xp service pack 2 Gracias. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es hiciste el smbpaswd -a root ? y le pusiste contraseña? no te dio ningun error? usaste root para agregar la pc al dominio? hiciste los mapeos de grupos? -- #--el- -Con linux no siempre Ganas :( Charla entra amigote y la bruja Amigote: Che asi que lo enganchaste nomas como lo convenciste la bruja: Facil me disfrace de Pinguino y acepto enceguida ;) #--- ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org
Re: [CentOS-es] Problema extraño con Samba.
Solucionado!! Bueno el asunto es que me fui con el equipo a donde estaba el server con samba lo conecte con un cable cruzado, hice el procedimiento para cambiarlo de domnio, y se unio al dominio. Aperentemente hay problema en la red, parece que algun switch esta filtrando de alguna manera los paquetes que ocupa samba, lo extraño es que los equipos que nunca estuvieron en el domnio antiguo (win2003), nunca pesentaron problemas se unian al dominio sin problemas. bueno gracias a todos por la ayuda. Atte. Mario Ganga Castro. On Nov 21, 2007 4:16 PM, Mario Ganga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ya solucione este error params.c:Parameter() - Ignoring badly formed line in configuration file: t of which are not shown in this example tenia una t en el archivo smb.conf fuera de los comentarios. la borre y listo ahora voy por el otro aunque ya no veo nada malo Atte. Mario Ganga Castro On Nov 21, 2007 3:33 PM, Mario Ganga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Si estimado la saque la volvi a agregar de variasd maneras... te cuento que probe con otro server con samba el de pruebas con un cable cruzado y listo se agrego sin problemas el server de pruebas en centos 4.5 no recuerdo la version de samba... asi que hice lo suguiente tome smb.conf de centos 4.5 lo movi a centos 5.0 haciendo los cambios necesarios obviamente, eche a correr samba sin problemas... ejecute un testparm y me arroja los siguientes errores: Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf params.c:Parameter() - Ignoring badly formed line in configuration file: # This is the main Samba configuration file. You should read the params.c:Parameter() - Ignoring badly formed line in configuration file: t of which are not shown in this example Le estado preguntando a google pero nada... Atte. Mario Ganga Castro. On Nov 21, 2007 12:54 PM, Maximo Mosalvo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mario Ganga wrote: Hola maximo gracias por tu atencion Con respecto a tus preguntas hiciste el smbpaswd -a root ? y le pusiste contraseña? no te dio ningun error? lo hice y no arroja ningun error. usaste root para agregar la pc al dominio? Si uso al root para unirlos al dominio, como explicaba en el correo las maquinas nuevas las que no estaban en el antiguo dominio funciona, pero en la que probe que si estaba en el antiguo me arroja el error. pregunta tonta la sacaste del dominio y la volviste a agregar al nuevo?? hiciste los mapeos de grupos? No lo he hecho, aunque ejecuto el comando: net groupmap list y no me muestra nada eso es raro deberia mostrame los grupos con su sid. en realidad los samba nuevos bienen asi tenes que hacer lo mapeos vos Atte. Mario Ganga Castro On Nov 21, 2007 10:43 AM, Maximo Mosalvo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mario Ganga wrote: Hola estimados: Les cuento el problema que ha surgido con windows y samba en centos 5, espero me puedan ayudar: Por razones tecnicas nos vemos de migar de win 2003 a samba Todo iba bien las pruebas con maquinas que no se encontraban el el dominio en windows( la maquina se unia al dominio todo bien). Asi que decidimos probar con una mquina que estaba en el dominio windows y se genera el siguiente error: error al intertar unir al dominio x error de inicio de sesion: usuario desconocino o contraseña incorrecta. - Eso es obvio que un problema de que el root no esta agregado a samba con la respectiva clave, asi que saque al root de samba y lo volvi a agregar pero el problema continua. - Descomente unas lineas del samba.conf : - os level = 65 - wins support = yes - Guarde los cambios y reinicie el servicio pero el problema continua Es raro por que las maquinas que no estaban el dominio windows funciona bien... Asi que crei que es problema del windows de esa maquina. investige y encontre 2 cosas: cambiar el valor de la clave de registro: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\Currentcontrolset\services\netlogon\parameters requiresignorseal = dword=0001 por requiresignorseal = dword= el error continua. - Despues cambie las politicas de seguridad especificamente: Seguridad de red: Nivel autenticacion de LAN Manager Enviar LM Y NTLM por NTLMv2 si se negocia. pero el error sigue. Espero haberme explicado bien, El kernel que ocupo es: 2.6.18-8.1.15.el5, version de samba: 3.0.23c-2.el5.2.0.2 la maquina del problema es windows xp service pack 2 Gracias. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es hiciste
Re: [CentOS-es] Centos 5 en portatil con Chipset Intel 965
Estimado miguel: Desde mi punto de vista un portatil es para ser ocupado como estacion de trabajo. Creo que centos no es la distribucion mas indicada para un portatil, es mas bien para servidores. Yo utilizaria mandriva, (k)ubuntu o fedora en ultimo caso. Atte. Mario Ganga Castro. On Nov 21, 2007 4:22 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hola, Me acabo de comprar un portatil y de cabeza a Centos... tiene un chipset intel 965 express y el SO solo me lanza las X cuando configuro el xorg.conf con vesa. El problema es que me coge una resolución maxima de 1024 x 7.. y la pantalla del portatil es panoramica, con lo que me quedan 2 bandas monisimas negras a los lados. Tengo que configurar centos para el chipset intel 965.. para ello: -en consola ejecuto SETUP y voy a configurar X. obviamente tengo que tenerlo puesto en vesa para que funcione. -elijo el intel provider.. aceptar.. de nuevo pantalla en blanco. Que hago mal?? que hago?? un saludo, Miguel. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Disco SCSI se habrá desconec tado?
Camilo Sperberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Muy buenas tardes ;) Primero que nada, me presento... Soi de Chile, estudiante a tiempo completo y trabajador a medio tiempo en 2 trabajos xD Es primera vez que me suscribo a una lista de correos en muchos años y por fin entendí la utilidad del gmail de reunir todos los temas que tengan un mismo subject :P Obviamente, trataré de poner toda mi ayuda en la medida de lo posible... no soi un gurú pero tampoco un principiante, llevo su resto de años ya :) Pero bueno, al grano... Desde hace algún tiempo que me llegó un equipo para jugar, un IBM Netfinity 5000, para lo cual elegí instalarle CentOS porque en mi casa tengo otro servidor con CentOS hace harto tiempo ya y nunca me había dado un problema. Resulta que ayer en la tarde, al verificar cómo andaba el servidor, me di cuenta de algo: para cualquier comando que exigiera algún uso del disco, me tiraba error de entrada/salida. Recién hoy en la mañana, cuando pude entrar a la sala, pude diagnosticar bien el problema... Pero al final no sé qué es lo que habrá pasado ... Previamente había leído en esta misma lista que ejecutara el comando smartctl -a /dev/sda pero al ejecutar ese comando como root, me dio el mensaje de error de que había ocurrido un problema de entrada/salida. Cuento corto: no podía hacer casi nada. Al ejecutar un ls -alh al directorio /usr/sbin/ (donde está smartctl) me aparecía lo siguiente: ?- 1 ? ? ? may 2 2007 smartctl , donde smartctl estaba destacado en rojo sobre fondo blanco. Al tratar de cambiar algún setting, no guardaba el cambio, y si me logeaba múltiples veces, me mostraba siempre que me había logeado por última vez hacía 1 semana atrás. (ejemplo) En este punto, era obvio que el disco había sido sacado en caliente, por lo cual pedí la llave para ver si efectivamente el disco estaba o no, y para sorpresa mía, el disco estaba ! Ejecuté primero un shutdown -h NOW ; sin éxito. Me decía error en entrada/salida. Tampoco estaba en la ram este comando. Ejecuté un halt, y no pasó nada. Simplemente no apagaba el equipo, no hacía nada el comando, por lo que opté por hacer un apagado forzoso. Una vez apagado el equipo, saqué el disco, lo limpié y volví a colocarlo. Ejecuté las pruebas que vienen con la controladora, y ningún problema fue detectado. Luego booteé y ningún problema. No tiró ningún kernel panic, cargó todos los servicios que tenía que cargar, y el equipo booteó sin problema alguna... como si hubiese sido un simple booteo... Mi teoría? El disco se soltó... pero no tiene ninguna lógica, no tenía (tanto) polvo, y el disco estaba bien sujeto (de hecho, me costó sacarlo, estaba bien apretado). Qué opinan ustedes? Algún problema con CentOS 5 y la controladora? O mi teoría es correcta y que lo único que pasó fue que se soltó un poco el disco? controladora: (desde vi /var/log/dmesg) scsi0 : Adaptec AIC7XXX EISA/VLB/PCI SCSI HBA DRIVER, Rev 7.0 Adaptec aic7895 Ultra SCSI adapter aic7895C: Ultra Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/253 SCBs Cabe destacar que el equipo estuvo funcionando perfecto desde hacía unos 45 días (sin reinicios de por medio), y de repente tuvo esta falla ... Si necesitan más antecedentes, no duden en escribir ;) Saludos !! -- Mailed by: UnReAl4U - unreal4u ICQ #54472056 GTalk: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.chilehardware.com/ ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es wow, esa es mi historia,,,ja,ja,ja a mi me paso exactamente lo mismo con un server ya en produccion, el problema es que este equipo esta como a 40 km de mi oficina y con todo y pena tuve que ir in situ a apagarlo fisicamente. Al reiniciarse todo volvio a la normalidad hasta el dia de hoy. Todo a causa de ejecutar el comando smartctl De lo cual surge mi duda: ¿Tendria que haber primero desmontado todas las particiones para ejecutar enseguida dicho comando? ¿O es porque los discos son SATA? En mi caso es un server Dell con 2 discos duros SATA si no mal recuerdo en RAID 1 (espejo) saludos a todos. - ¡Capacidad ilimitada de almacenamiento en tu correo! No te preocupes más por el espacio de tu cuenta con Correo Yahoo!: http://correo.yahoo.com.mx/___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] Release Notes: Translation, an explanation and something to translate
Hey, somehow we're always running late with those release notes. But: We have a new idea - living online release notes. What does that mean? We are going to split the release notes and have a very short version on the actual CentOS ISOs - those then point to the *real* release notes on wiki.centos.org and to some other places on the wiki and www.centos.org. The real release notes are going to be on the wiki and can be modified as needed (for example the Known issues section could grow during the lifetime of 5.1). And this is also the part where most of the translation has to happen! So attached to this mail are the release notes which go on the Isos. These need to be translated real soon now (today would be great - November 22nd 2007 that is, European time that is). Please send those translations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the meantime we are going to develop longer release notes on http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.1 - these need to be translated also. And to translate these, all translators need an account on wiki.centos.org. So please create an account for yourself (FirstnameLastname - JoeyMiller for example) and send that account name (not the password!) to [EMAIL PROTECTED] also. I'll add you to the list of people who are allowed to edit translations then. This process can take a longer time, these don't need to be complete when 5.1 comes out. Short summary: Please translate the attached text *as soon as possible* and send the results (please only one result per language) to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please send your LoginNames for the wiki to [EMAIL PROTECTED] also - otherwise you won't be able to edit the release notes on the wiki. After that you can begin translating the online release notes. The CentOS team wants to thank you all for the great work you are putting into the release (and have during the last release) - you guys and girls are great. THANK YOU! And now start working =:) Ralph PS: Please don't reply to this mail :) PPS: Release notes are attached ---8- The CentOS project welcomes you to CentOS-5.1. The complete release notes for CentOS-5.1 can be found online at http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.1. A list of frequently asked questions and answers about CentOS-5 can be found here : http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOS5. If you are looking for help with CentOS, we recommend you start at http://wiki.centos.org/GettingHelp for pointers to the different sources where you can get help. For more information about The CentOS Project in general please visit our homepage at http://www.centos.org. If you would like to contribute to the CentOS Project, see http://wiki.centos.org/HowToContribute for areas where you could help. ---8- pgpjP3eFE83Nr.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Centos 5 en portatil con Chipset Intel 965
Estimado Mario, Precisamente por esa razon es por la que quiero instalar CentOS. Necesito una distribución basada en Red Hat y Fedora no m gusta. Habitualmente trabajo con Suse y con Debian Etch pero en el portatil por el curso que voy a hacer necesito CentOs. El tema grafico es mas por desafio y por coraje que otra cosa por que al final lo que de verdad necesito es entorno texto, y aqui el gran problema: Tal como esta configurada ahora mismo la maquina, con vesa, puedo levantar las X pero lo que no puedo es volver a modo consola.. ni cambiar a init 3 ni na.. se me queda el entorno grafico pillado... Puedes echarme una mano?? Miguel Estimado miguel: Desde mi punto de vista un portatil es para ser ocupado como estacion de trabajo. Creo que centos no es la distribucion mas indicada para un portatil, es mas bien para servidores. Yo utilizaria mandriva, (k)ubuntu o fedora en ultimo caso. Atte. Mario Ganga Castro. On Nov 21, 2007 4:22 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hola, Me acabo de comprar un portatil y de cabeza a Centos... tiene un chipset intel 965 express y el SO solo me lanza las X cuando configuro el xorg.conf con vesa. El problema es que me coge una resolución maxima de 1024 x 7.. y la pantalla del portatil es panoramica, con lo que me quedan 2 bandas monisimas negras a los lados. Tengo que configurar centos para el chipset intel 965.. para ello: -en consola ejecuto SETUP y voy a configurar X. obviamente tengo que tenerlo puesto en vesa para que funcione. -elijo el intel provider.. aceptar.. de nuevo pantalla en blanco. Que hago mal?? que hago?? un saludo, Miguel. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Centos 5 en portatil con Chipset Intel 965
El Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:22:44 +0100 (CET) [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Hola, Me acabo de comprar un portatil y de cabeza a Centos... tiene un chipset intel 965 express y el SO solo me lanza las X cuando configuro el xorg.conf con vesa. El problema es que me coge una resolución maxima de 1024 x 7.. y la pantalla del portatil es panoramica, con lo que me quedan 2 bandas monisimas negras a los lados. Tengo que configurar centos para el chipset intel 965.. para ello: -en consola ejecuto SETUP y voy a configurar X. obviamente tengo que tenerlo puesto en vesa para que funcione. -elijo el intel provider.. aceptar.. de nuevo pantalla en blanco. Que hago mal?? que hago?? un saludo, El problema está en que la lista de modos de vídeo soportados por la tarjeta 965 es superior a la lista de modos que seleccionables en la propia tarjeta. El paquete 915resolution permite redefinir de forma muy sencilla alguno de dichos modos de vídeo. Si mi memoria no me falla, el RPM que hay para Centos5 no reconoce todavía la 965, pero las últimas versiones si lo reconocen. Lo recomendable es redefinir los modos de vídeo durante el arranque de la máquina y después ya arrancarás las X si te interesa. El 915resolution lo encontrarás en http://www.geocities.com/stomljen/ Saludos Ignasi Cavero ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Release Notes: Translation, an explanation and something to translate
--- Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, somehow we're always running late with those release notes. But: We have a new idea - living online release notes. In the meantime we are going to develop longer release notes on http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.1 - these need to be translated also. And to translate these, all translators need an account on wiki.centos.org. So please create an account for yourself (FirstnameLastname - JoeyMiller for example) and send that account name (not the password!) to [EMAIL PROTECTED] also. I'll add you to the list of people who are allowed to edit translations then. PS: Please don't reply to this mail :) bueno, entonces como coordinamos? anyway, mejor mando mi version de la traduccion a la lista y que cuando haya un acuerdo (antes de mañana) alguien se lo envie a ralph PPS: Release notes are attached ---8- El proyecto CentOS le da la bienvenida a CentOS-5.1. Las notas completas para esta versión pueden leerse en : http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.1. Una lista de las preguntas y respuestas más frecuentes acerca de CentOS-5 pueden encontrarse en: http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOS5. Si ud está buscando ayuda con CentOS nosotros le recomendamos empezar visitando la página http://wiki.centos.org/GettingHelp allí encontrará indicaciones sobre donde y como obtener ayuda. Para más información acerca El Proyecto CentOS en general le recomendamos visitar nuestra página web http://www.centos.org. Si ud desea contribuir al Proyecto CentOS, busque en http://wiki.centos.org/HowToContribute tópicos o áreas donde ud puede ayudar __ RedHat Certified ( RHCE ) Cisco Certified ( CCNA CCDA ) Be a better sports nut! Let your teams follow you with Yahoo Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/sports;_ylt=At9_qDKvtAbMuh1G1SQtBI7ntAcJ ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] manipulating files and directories with spaces
Shad L. Lords wrote:
find . -type type -print0 | xargs -0 chmod value
Or (SUSV compliant):
find . -type f -exec chmod 123 {} +
Cheers,
Ralph
pgpzeE6PHw7zH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] manipulating files and directories with spaces
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 10:04 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Shad L. Lords wrote:
find . -type type -print0 | xargs -0 chmod value
Or (SUSV compliant):
find . -type f -exec chmod 123 {} +
Easier to type and more natural (for me). But less efficient than the
xargs version since each file cause a new process to be spawned. For a
very large number of items the difference would be noticeable.
Cheers,
Ralph
snip sig stuff
--
Bill
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] manipulating files and directories with spaces
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 10:04 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Shad L. Lords wrote:
find . -type type -print0 | xargs -0 chmod value
Or (SUSV compliant):
find . -type f -exec chmod 123 {} +
P.S.
Don't forget to escape the { and }.
snip
--
Bill
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] manipulating files and directories with spaces
William L. Maltby wrote:
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 10:04 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Shad L. Lords wrote:
find . -type type -print0 | xargs -0 chmod value
Or (SUSV compliant):
find . -type f -exec chmod 123 {} +
Easier to type and more natural (for me). But less efficient than the
xargs version since each file cause a new process to be spawned. For a
very large number of items the difference would be noticeable.
Wrong.
-exec command {} +
This variant of the -exec option runs the specified command on
the selected files, but the command line is built by appending
each selected file name at the end; the total number of invo-
cations of the command will be much less than the number of
matched files. The command line is built in much the same way
that xargs builds its command lines. Only one instance of
’{}’ is allowed within the command. The command is executed
in the starting directory.
And yes, that works on mostly any Unix (as said: SUSV compliant), while
many commercial unixes have interesting implementations of xargs and
-print0 (or don't have that at all).
Cheers,
Ralph
pgpAfPYBrmXZp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: manipulating files and directories with spaces
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William L. Maltby wrote:
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 10:04 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Shad L. Lords wrote:
find . -type type -print0 | xargs -0 chmod value
Or (SUSV compliant):
find . -type f -exec chmod 123 {} +
Easier to type and more natural (for me). But less efficient than the
xargs version since each file cause a new process to be spawned. For a
very large number of items the difference would be noticeable.
Wrong.
-exec command {} +
This variant of the -exec option runs the specified command on
the selected files, but the command line is built by appending
each selected file name at the end; the total number of invo-
cations of the command will be much less than the number of
matched files. The command line is built in much the same way
that xargs builds its command lines. Only one instance of
{} is allowed within the command. The command is executed
in the starting directory.
And yes, that works on mostly any Unix (as said: SUSV compliant), while
many commercial unixes have interesting implementations of xargs and
-print0 (or don't have that at all).
Maybe, but unless it works on CentOS 5, it is irrelevant to this list.
It certainly is not available in the find on CentOS 4:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# find /home/user/ -type f -exec echo {} + \:
find: missing argument to `-exec'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#
Cheers
Tony
--
Tony Mountifield
Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.softins.co.uk
Play: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://tony.mountifield.org
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: manipulating files and directories with spaces
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
William L. Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 10:04 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Shad L. Lords wrote:
find . -type type -print0 | xargs -0 chmod value
Or (SUSV compliant):
find . -type f -exec chmod 123 {} +
P.S.
Don't forget to escape the { and }.
Why? I've never needed to.
Cheers
Tony
--
Tony Mountifield
Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.softins.co.uk
Play: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://tony.mountifield.org
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: manipulating files and directories with spaces
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 10:45:12AM +, Tony Mountifield wrote:
...
Maybe, but unless it works on CentOS 5, it is irrelevant to this list.
it works on CentOS-5 (findutils-4.2.27-4.1)
It certainly is not available in the find on CentOS 4:
The request was specific on CentOS-5. What's you point?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# find /home/user/ -type f -exec echo {} + \:
find: missing argument to `-exec'
you would have the syntax wrong:
find /home/user/ -type f -exec echo {} +
but it's not available on CentOS-4 (findutils-4.1.20-7.el4.3)
nor CentOS-3 (findutils-4.1.7-9.).
Cheers.
Tru
--
Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B
pgpTzJQdEUt2Y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: manipulating files and directories with spaces
Tru Huynh wrote:
you would have the syntax wrong:
find /home/user/ -type f -exec echo {} +
but it's not available on CentOS-4 (findutils-4.1.20-7.el4.3)
nor CentOS-3 (findutils-4.1.7-9.).
Yeah, gnu tools sometimes seem very late when it comes to adopting
standards :)
Cheers,
Ralph
pgpgVk3mOTKSi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Dual boot box: WinXP CentOS 5: Impossible to restoreWinXP?
On Monday, 19 November 2007, Phil Schaffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip A good toolkit for Windows is the Ultimate Boot CD for Windows at http://www.ubcd4win.com/ It uses BartPE, discussed earlier, but adds a lot more tools, including rootkit and antivirus scanners. A clean install after data recovery is still the best bet. Phil: I did some reading on their web site. I do like that better than BartPE! They include information about workarounds, when using it with a Dell WinXP Recovery CD, for one example. I'll make a CD for that, after I'm up and running. Thanks! Lanny ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Dual boot box: WinXP CentOS 5: Impossible to restoreWinXP?
On Tueday, 20 November 2007, Ross S. W. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip I should have asked how big your setup was currently. The HD is only 40 GB on my box, a low end Dell Dimension 2400 (2.6 GHz Celeron) I won in a raffle. After I get this one up and running, I am going to switch wife and daughter's boxes, and redo them completely. Wife's current box has an 80 GB HD, which will give me a lot more room to experiment with VMware Server, which is something I want to learn about and use, until we get a box that is Xen capable.. Oh well, yes the Windows apps take a while to install, been there myself. Been there and done that? I have huge appreciation, for the large number of packages that come from Upstream and are included in CentOS and the speed with which I can install the OS and so much stuff. And, for an example, the tools included, that would permit me to repair the WinXP problem, from the Linux side of the box, as you explained. To say nothing of my appreciation for the Developers of CentOS and the others who make this such a wonderful mailing list. I'm an old retired Assembly Language programmer (started with IBM 360/65) and I never worked with Unix, so this is a brand new world for me and one that I regret I did not work in, professionally. If I were to re-do the whole drive, not knowing it's size I might do it as such: snip You can then install Windows from within vmware by making /dev/sdc a raw disk for vmware. Once it's installed you could add an entry in grub to boot into it. I'm going to RTFM and I think this time around, make it dual boot again and also try to install Windows within VMware, as you explain. Next time, I will hopefully have enough confidence in my ability to do this properly, that I will only install CentOS and then install Windows within VMware. Thanks much! Lanny ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Dual boot box: WinXP CentOS 5: Impossible to restore WinXP?
On Tuesday, 20 November 2007, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip I think it's been mentioned in the thread, but since you don't talk about this in your summary above: one thing I would recommend is create (at least) 2 partitions for MS: a small (5 to 10 G) for the system, and a larger one for data. Nicholas: Our other boxes have four (4) partitions for Windows. I've never installed Windows on this box, because it came from the factory with WinXp in Spanish. I reduced the NTFS partition in size, to make room for CentOS, but it's still running what came on it, out of the Dell factory. Last week, I got an English language WinXP from Dell, so I'm ready to roll in English now and do it properly on this one too! then use norton/symantec ghost to generate images of your system Several of our boxes have had Removable EIDE drive units in them (made by CRU) and I used those, before I began using Linux, to make images, and that was a great thing to do. I got lazy about making the backups and found it easier to backup over the network. I didn't use Norton Ghost, I used something else, but as I write this, I can't recall the name of the Utility I used to make the images. As I recall, at that time (a few years ago), Norton was more difficult to use and I'd read something about some unreliable results from Ghost. you can probably do this with linux tools as well if you don't want to buy ghost. Yes. I will do everything possible with Linux tools in the future. Thank you! Lanny ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Migration from RH9
Hi, I will probably have to migrate a few servers running Red Hat 9 to CentOS and I'd like to have opinions. One server to migrate is running Fedora core 4. Reason for migrating to CentOS: no more security updates available, hardware change planned anyway. Here are the services to be migrated: sendmail pop (not sure which daemon, I think it is running the default daemon in RH9) DNS apache+PHP website FTP Dansguardian Samba Perforce Squid I haven't seen any directories like LDAP or windows Active Directory, so I assume for now that all authentication is done locally. Anyone has experience with that? I'm not too scared about sendmail, Bind, apache/PHP (except that maybe the PHP upgrade may break the website, but this is easily managed and can be tested), ftp. However, I don't know dansguardian much, but I guess it would be a good idea to integrate it with squid. I don't know squid much, but depending on what they're doing with it, it should be fairly simple. For samba, are there major changes between the default version in RH9 and Centos4 or 5? Anyone migrated a perforce environment? I'm also wondering whether I migrate them to centos3, 4, or 5. 3 would be to make the transition easier, while still letting them have many years of security updates. 4 is the version I use most, I barely touched 5. 5 would be for xen and... your ideas? I usually use OpenVZ for virtualization, but they might want to virtualize windows servers too, which OpenVZ can't do. Any input would be appreciated, Regards, Ugo ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Dual boot box: WinXP CentOS 5: Impossible to restore WinXP?
On Tuesday, 20 November 2007, Bart Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip I'd second this, but I'd say it's much better to go in the direction of 10G than 5. I installed WinXP on a Mac Mini (BootCamp) with 5GB on the internal drive and everything else on a firewire external drive, and now after about a year of automatic updates that 5GB is so nearly consumed that I'm having to shuffle things around by hand to keep it working. It's just too damn difficult to prevent Windows software from dumping crap on the C: drive (and then referencing its location in the registry so it becomes nearly impossible to relocate it). Bart: I'm contemplating using 10 of the 40 GB for WinXP and the rest for CentOS 5. I hope to redo this box on Friday. What you mentioned is one of my many pet peeves about Windows. Frequently, I will install some Windows ap and the piggish programmers who wrote the stuff were not professional enough to allow me to select where I want it installed (our other boxes have a D partition for Programs, which is where I'd want it installed) and they just go ahead and install into C, as if they own the box. Lanny ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Dual boot box: WinXP CentOS 5: Impossible to restoreWinXP?
On Tuesday, 20 November 2007, Nicolas Sahlqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip I top that with another 10 - 20 GB, assume you got a DVD iso to burn, so you make a copy and due to the effective native copy file feature, expect a copy to be placed in some temp folder on C: why you need another 5 - 8 GB free and then the space the DVD occupies.. This is also true if you copy between 2 SMB shares, even if none of them are on the local machine, it's neat iand effective isn't it? Nicholas: We need much bigger hard drives to do that. What you wrote makes a lot of sense and when it becomes possible, I'll devote that much space to M$ Windows. My eventual goal is to discontinue using Windows and avoid these problems. Lanny ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] su error need help???
I 'su to root and run command. I got error message. Anyone know how to fix it? = /home/app/oracle/product/oms10g/install/unix/scripts/omsstup start /bin/su: user %s_userName% does not exist __ 怎樣減少垃圾信？只要看到垃圾信，立即按下「這是垃圾信」按鈕。http://tw.promo.yahoo.com/antispam/index.html ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] html/form newbie: trying to upload a little data to a server
Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Tuesday, November 20, 2007 5:09 PM -0500 Charles E Campbell Jr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, here's the form:
form method=POST action=mmsrequest
That says the script is in the same directory as the form. Is your web
server set up to allow scripts to be executed from the content
directory? This will be restricted by both httpd.conf (and includes)
and by SELinux, if enabled.
Which distro? Which version of Apache? What language is the script in?
Can you execute the script from the command line? (Many web script
systems allow you to debug from the command line with some suitable
setup, allowing you to test without an actual web server.)
My client side is a centos o/s... but the server side is an SGI. I've
found the following in a couple of httpd.conf files (I've found three on
the system):
httpd.conf -- SGI Outbox Apache HTTP server config file... [ port 80 ]
In there:
Directory /usr/people/*/public_html
AllowOverride FileInfo AuthConfig Limit
Options Indexes Includes FollowSymLinks MultiViews
/Directory
The scripts and html page are in that sort of a directory, ie.
/usr/people/cec/public_html , so I think the httpd.conf is the pertinent
one.
How do I find out what version of Apache is installed? How do I find
out if SELinux is enabled?
The script -- well, I've tried Kornshell:
#! /bin/ksh
echo '$*'$*''
echo 'QUERY_STRING'${QUERY_STRING}''
and I've written a small C file, compiled it, etc. In both cases I set
permissions to rwxrwxrwx (and directory paths) just to make sure for now
that they are not permission bound.
Both the script and executable work fine from the command line.
Thank you for helping,
Chip Campbell
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] su error need help???
mcclnx mcc wrote: I 'su to root and run command. I got error message. Anyone know how to fix it? = /home/app/oracle/product/oms10g/install/unix/scripts/omsstup start /bin/su: user %s_userName% does not exist what is this oracle stuff doing here? please copy-paste the _command_ you typed and the error message. try /bin/su if this works, then see why your 'su' is aliased (try alias su) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: su error need help???
mcclnx mcc wrote: I 'su to root and run command. I got error message. Anyone know how to fix it? = /home/app/oracle/product/oms10g/install/unix/scripts/omsstup start /bin/su: user %s_userName% does not exist I guess the user that is called doesn't exist. You'd have to look in the script to see which user is called there. Was there an installation procedure or directives? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] resize an image file
On Nov 21, 2007 1:26 PM, Jerry Geis geisj at pagestation.com http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos wrote: / I have a 100G disk on an old redhat 7.3 system. // // FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on // /dev/hda1 9.6G 2.4G 6.7G 27% / // /dev/hda3 99G 6.1G 88G 7% /home // hda2 is 2G swap // // I am trying to back that complete image up on my centos 5 system. // I can do the dd if=/dev/hda bs=1M | ssh root at machine http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos 'cat disk.img' // which gets me the whole 100G. // // As you can see most of the disk is unused. // Is there a way to trim the resulting image to only be 10G instead of 100G? // // Thanks, // Jerry / Try gzipping it, or bzip2: dd if=/dev/hda bs=1M | gzip | ssh root at machine http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos 'cat disk.img.gz' Make sure to put the gzip before the ssh, so you'll compress before you send over the network. Brian, Oh that compression will help, thanks. However, once I have the image file I actually want to uncompress it and resize it so its down to the 10G. I will be using this file as a virtual image. I dont want it setting there taking up 100G when all it really is for me is 10G. How do I CHOP off the unneeded 90G. Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] how to Load balancing
Hi I need informmation about this Topic: Load balancing,, I have 2 nic to internet, 1 nic to DMZ, and 1 nic to LAN, but I don,t know how do that. Where I can found information ?? Thx!! For your information! -- Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos, y se considera que está limpio. For all your IT requirements visit: http://www.transtec.co.uk ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] resize an image file
I have a 100G disk on an old redhat 7.3 system. FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/hda1 9.6G 2.4G 6.7G 27% / /dev/hda3 99G 6.1G 88G 7% /home hda2 is 2G swap I am trying to back that complete image up on my centos 5 system. I can do the dd if=/dev/hda bs=1M | ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'cat disk.img' which gets me the whole 100G. As you can see most of the disk is unused. Is there a way to trim the resulting image to only be 10G instead of 100G? Thanks, Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] resize an image file
Jerry Geis wrote: However, once I have the image file I actually want to uncompress it and resize it so its down to the 10G. I will be using this file as a virtual image. I dont want it setting there taking up 100G when all it really is for me is 10G. How do I CHOP off the unneeded 90G. create a file the size you want on the destination, run newfs on it, and loopback mount it, then... tar clzf - / /home | ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] '(cd /mountpoint ; tar xvzf -)' ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] html/form newbie: trying to upload a little data to a server
On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 17:09 -0500, Charles E Campbell Jr wrote: Hello! I've been trying for several hours to upload a few bits of data (not a file) from an html form to a server, and none of my variants have worked thus far. I've done some web searching, too. Anyway, here's the form: form method=POST action=mmsrequest pre UserID: input type=text NAME=userid Date : input type=text NAME=date value=mm/dd/yy Time : input type=text NAME=time value=hh:mm:ss input type=submit input type=reset ^ How about changing type to submit? /pre /form I've tried mmsrequest as a script and as an executable. Full path, etc. In and out of cgi-bin. Variants tried: method=GET I end up with a copy of the script (well, I told the browser not to bother trying to display the executable), instead of having the script run. method=POST I either end up with a Not Found or Method Not Allowed. I've always insured that permissions were rwxrwxrwx, just to avoid any permissions problem, expecting to tighten that up after I got the basic thing working. I don't particularly care if the script or executable gets the information from the command line separated by ampersands and whatnot, environment variable (QUERY_STRING, or so I understand), or from standard input. However, I do care that the script/program gets run and does get the information somehow, on the server side. Any suggestions? Thank you, Chip Campbell ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Travis Fraser [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: perl 5.8.5-36.el4_5.2
Scott Silva wrote: on 11/16/2007 7:46 AM Theo Band spake the following: Johnny Hughes wrote: Tom wrote: Hi all, Since upgrading to perl 5.8.5-36.el4_5.2 I have had no end of problems, starting with needing compress::zlib which I got from rpmforge, then I had to reinstall scalar::util to get mailscanner working but now I can't install or upgrade any perl modules. Has anyone else had problems or can someone tell me what I've done wrong please? regards tom OK ... I want to make something PERFECTLY CLEAR ... Using CPAN installed modules is NOT supported while using a Package Management system like RPM. You should NOT use CPAN to install perl modules, nor should you use pear to install pear modules. That is because when you reinstall php-pear or perl, you will loose these items that are updated/installed in any way other than via RPMS. If you are using CentOS. then you need to get all your perl modules and pear modules via RPM. If you need something, it should probably exist either at RPMForge, at KBS-Centos-Extras, at EPEL or in the worst case condition, take one of the other modules that does exist and use it to create the module. Also, look in Fedora 6.7.8 and see if you can get an SRPM to make your modules. If you don't ... when perl or php-pear are upgraded, your install will absolutely, positively, beyond any and all shadow of doubt be BROKEN. (BTW, this is not to Tom .. but to the whole list ... DON'T INSTALL CRAP FROM CPAN ) Thanks, Johnny Hughes Ok, loud and clear. What's the best way to revert back if a mess has been created. I tried to install bugzilla on a Centos4.5 server but did not succeed. I now run bugzilla on a Fedora installation instead. The bugzilla installation suggested to install all kind of needed perl modules using CPAN. So what's the best procedure to revert back the perl installation and maintain it with yum? I checked with rpm -V perl-5.8.5-36.el4_5.2.i386 and see a lot of modified files. An uninstall is going to remove 266 packages, so re-install is not a good option I guess. Yum upgrade/install will not work, since the package is already installed of course. Thanks for your help, and I shall never use CPAN again, never I promise. Cheers, Theo You could try rpm -Uvh --replacefiles and see if it fixes it Thanks for the heads up Johnny, I ended up manually removing as many cpan modules 1 by 1 that I could find rpm's for and installing the appropriate rpm's. There are still quite a few cpan modules that don't have rpm's but I now have everything fixed :) tom ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: perl 5.8.5-36.el4_5.2
on 11/21/2007 3:07 PM Tom spake the following: Scott Silva wrote: on 11/16/2007 7:46 AM Theo Band spake the following: Johnny Hughes wrote: Tom wrote: Hi all, Since upgrading to perl 5.8.5-36.el4_5.2 I have had no end of problems, starting with needing compress::zlib which I got from rpmforge, then I had to reinstall scalar::util to get mailscanner working but now I can't install or upgrade any perl modules. Has anyone else had problems or can someone tell me what I've done wrong please? regards tom OK ... I want to make something PERFECTLY CLEAR ... Using CPAN installed modules is NOT supported while using a Package Management system like RPM. You should NOT use CPAN to install perl modules, nor should you use pear to install pear modules. That is because when you reinstall php-pear or perl, you will loose these items that are updated/installed in any way other than via RPMS. If you are using CentOS. then you need to get all your perl modules and pear modules via RPM. If you need something, it should probably exist either at RPMForge, at KBS-Centos-Extras, at EPEL or in the worst case condition, take one of the other modules that does exist and use it to create the module. Also, look in Fedora 6.7.8 and see if you can get an SRPM to make your modules. If you don't ... when perl or php-pear are upgraded, your install will absolutely, positively, beyond any and all shadow of doubt be BROKEN. (BTW, this is not to Tom .. but to the whole list ... DON'T INSTALL CRAP FROM CPAN ) Thanks, Johnny Hughes Ok, loud and clear. What's the best way to revert back if a mess has been created. I tried to install bugzilla on a Centos4.5 server but did not succeed. I now run bugzilla on a Fedora installation instead. The bugzilla installation suggested to install all kind of needed perl modules using CPAN. So what's the best procedure to revert back the perl installation and maintain it with yum? I checked with rpm -V perl-5.8.5-36.el4_5.2.i386 and see a lot of modified files. An uninstall is going to remove 266 packages, so re-install is not a good option I guess. Yum upgrade/install will not work, since the package is already installed of course. Thanks for your help, and I shall never use CPAN again, never I promise. Cheers, Theo You could try rpm -Uvh --replacefiles and see if it fixes it Thanks for the heads up Johnny, I ended up manually removing as many cpan modules 1 by 1 that I could find rpm's for and installing the appropriate rpm's. There are still quite a few cpan modules that don't have rpm's but I now have everything fixed :) tom You can also try cpan2rpm and make your own. Or look at dag.wieers.com or atrpms.net. As long as they are in the database, there is less chance of things getting corrupted. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how to Load balancing
On Nov 21, 2007 2:19 PM, D. Bettancourt M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I need informmation about this Topic: Load balancing,, I have 2 nic to internet, 1 nic to DMZ, and 1 nic to LAN, but I don,t know how do that. Where I can found information ?? Thx!! For your information! Check out linuxvirtualserver.org -- -matt ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how to Load balancing
On Nov 21, 2007 8:19 PM, D. Bettancourt M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I need informmation about this Topic: Load balancing,, I have 2 nic to internet, 1 nic to DMZ, and 1 nic to LAN, but I don,t know how do that. Where I can found information ?? google : dual internet connection iptables iproutes google: multiple internet connection iptables iproutes Thx!! For your information! -- Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos, y se considera que está limpio. MailScanner agradece a transtec Computers por su apoyo. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Alain Spineux aspineux gmail com May the sources be with you ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how to Load balancing
Maybe you should take a look to Pfsense, nice firewall/routing distro, or even take a look at www.distrowatch.com and look for firewall/router distros, there are many results there, but i insist in www.pfsense.org that's the one i use for that task and there lots of help in email lists and howto stuff and even a forum, so take a look around. Or even firestarter/iptables howtos in here i think, www.howtoforge.com Hope it helps, On Nov 21, 2007 5:43 PM, Alain Spineux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 21, 2007 8:19 PM, D. Bettancourt M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I need informmation about this Topic: Load balancing,, I have 2 nic to internet, 1 nic to DMZ, and 1 nic to LAN, but I don,t know how do that. Where I can found information ?? google : dual internet connection iptables iproutes google: multiple internet connection iptables iproutes Thx!! For your information! -- Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos, y se considera que está limpio. MailScanner agradece a transtec Computers por su apoyo. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Alain Spineux aspineux gmail com May the sources be with you ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] resize an image file
I use Clonzilla to do this. XP machines and Linux machines, backed up to a Samba share. (So far) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerry Geis Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 10:27 AM To: CentOS ML Subject: [CentOS] resize an image file I have a 100G disk on an old redhat 7.3 system. FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/hda1 9.6G 2.4G 6.7G 27% / /dev/hda3 99G 6.1G 88G 7% /home hda2 is 2G swap I am trying to back that complete image up on my centos 5 system. I can do the dd if=/dev/hda bs=1M | ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'cat disk.img' which gets me the whole 100G. As you can see most of the disk is unused. Is there a way to trim the resulting image to only be 10G instead of 100G? Thanks, Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: how to Load balancing
D. Bettancourt M. wrote: Hi I need informmation about this Topic: Load balancing,, I have 2 nic to internet, 1 nic to DMZ, and 1 nic to LAN, but I don,t know how do that. Where I can found information ?? What do you need to load-balance? Internet connections or services on your server? Ugo ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] HDD usage oddity
- Original Message - From: Ugo Bellavance [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: centos@centos.org Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 10:37:31 AM (GMT+1000) Australia/Brisbane Subject: [CentOS] HDD usage oddity Hi, 2 of my Centos4 servers are showing weird behavior. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# du -sh /var/ 1.8G /var/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# df -h /var Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda7 4.3G 3.9G 181M 96% /var [EMAIL PROTECTED] var]# df -h /var Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda7 2.9G 2.7G 0 100% /var [EMAIL PROTECTED] var]# du -sh /var/ 1.6G /var/ du seems to be reporting the right size Anyone seeing this? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. Did you recently tidy up /var by deleting some files ? I think I've seen this sort of behaviour when you, for example, move and compress /var/log/messages without restarting syslog. It would seem that the storage isn't freed up until any process using it is restarted. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] HDD usage oddity
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 07:37:31PM -0500, Ugo Bellavance alleged: Hi, 2 of my Centos4 servers are showing weird behavior. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# du -sh /var/ 1.8G/var/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# df -h /var FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda7 4.3G 3.9G 181M 96% /var [EMAIL PROTECTED] var]# df -h /var FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda7 2.9G 2.7G 0 100% /var [EMAIL PROTECTED] var]# du -sh /var/ 1.6G/var/ du seems to be reporting the right size Neither is more correct. They report different things. 'df' reports on the number of blocks in use by the filesystem. 'du' crawls the filesystem and reports the number of blocks used by files. So what you have here is disk usage by stuff that isn't linked into the filesystem. This would mean deleted files that are still opened by processes. Try 'lsof /var | grep deleted' to list deleted and open files. pgpO2Lp2LtcCI.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] HDD usage oddity
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 07:37:31PM -0500, Ugo Bellavance wrote: 2 of my Centos4 servers are showing weird behavior. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# du -sh /var/ 1.8G/var/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# df -h /var FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda7 4.3G 3.9G 181M 96% /var There are two things to consider. ONE === If you have large block sizes and lots and lots of small files then du will report a number quite a lot smaller than df. df reports on actually amount free; du reports on apparent size of the files used. TWO === If you delete a file that is still open (typically a log file, or a file being written to in /var/tmp) then Unix doesn't actually delete the file at that point; it removes the directory entry and marks the file to be deleted when no one is using it any more. I've seen developers create debug logs in /tmp that grew to 2Gb then delete them to save space... while the program was still writing more debug messages, so they didn't save any space at all. -- rgds Stephen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: HDD usage oddity
Stephen Harris wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 07:37:31PM -0500, Ugo Bellavance wrote: 2 of my Centos4 servers are showing weird behavior. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# du -sh /var/ 1.8G/var/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# df -h /var FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda7 4.3G 3.9G 181M 96% /var There are two things to consider. ONE === If you have large block sizes and lots and lots of small files then du will report a number quite a lot smaller than df. df reports on actually amount free; du reports on apparent size of the files used. TWO === If you delete a file that is still open (typically a log file, or a file being written to in /var/tmp) then Unix doesn't actually delete the file at that point; it removes the directory entry and marks the file to be deleted when no one is using it any more. I've seen developers create debug logs in /tmp that grew to 2Gb then delete them to save space... while the program was still writing more debug messages, so they didn't save any space at all. That was it... I deleted a log that was still opened by syslog, and other by snort. After restarting snort and syslog, I got the right reading. diskcheck will not stop bugging me :) Thanks a lot! Ugo ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Port 631 closed, not hidden
I have the firewall turned on my CentOS 5 box, but GRC is reporting that 631 is closed instead of stealthed. If the firewall isn't configured to allow that, then why might that be happening? Miark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Port 631 closed, not hidden
Miark wrote: I have the firewall turned on my CentOS 5 box, but GRC is reporting that 631 is closed instead of stealthed. If the firewall isn't configured to allow that, then why might that be happening? Do your firewall rules DROP or REJECT? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
