[CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:1076 Moderate CentOS 3 s390(x) python - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:1076 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-1076.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/python-2.2.3-6.8.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/python-devel-2.2.3-6.8.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/python-docs-2.2.3-6.8.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/python-tools-2.2.3-6.8.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/tkinter-2.2.3-6.8.s390.rpm s390x: updates/s390x/RPMS/python-2.2.3-6.8.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/python-devel-2.2.3-6.8.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/python-docs-2.2.3-6.8.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/python-tools-2.2.3-6.8.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/tkinter-2.2.3-6.8.s390x.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:1076 Moderate CentOS 4 s390(x) python - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:1076 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-1076.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/python-2.3.4-14.4.c4.1.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/python-devel-2.3.4-14.4.c4.1.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/python-docs-2.3.4-14.4.c4.1.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/python-tools-2.3.4-14.4.c4.1.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/tkinter-2.3.4-14.4.c4.1.s390.rpm s390x: updates/s390x/RPMS/python-2.3.4-14.4.c4.1.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/python-devel-2.3.4-14.4.c4.1.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/python-docs-2.3.4-14.4.c4.1.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/python-tools-2.3.4-14.4.c4.1.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/tkinter-2.3.4-14.4.c4.1.s390x.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS-virt] i386 VM on x86_64 host in Xen
Christopher, - Christopher G. Stach II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It would really suck to have 3795 virtual machines die all at the same time from a single kernel panic. Yes, absolutely it would. I use the OpenVZ kernels that are based on the RHEL4 and RHEL5 kernels and I haven't had any problems with them... just like I haven't had any problems with the stock RHEL4 and RHEL5 kernels... nor CentOS kernels. I usually end up rebooting host node machines because of kernel upgrades... so my machines don't get a chance to have longish uptimes... but on one remote colocation machine I have for hobby stuff... it currently has an uptime of 106 days. It has 7 VPSes on it and they are fairly fat as they all run a full set of services. I know I've been running that machine for close to 2 years now... and if I remember correctly it started out with CentOS 4.0. I've upgraded to each release (on the host node and the VPSes) and am currently at CentOS 4.5. I look foward forward to 4.6. Here's what they look like (ip addresses and hostnames obscured): [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# vzlist VEID NPROC STATUS IP_ADDR HOSTNAME 101 53runningxx.xx.xx.xxvps101.localdomain 102 44runningxx.xx.xx.xxvps102.localdomain 103 44runningxx.xx.xx.xxvps103.localdomain 104 32runningxx.xx.xx.xxvps104.localdomain 105322 runningxx.xx.xx.xxvps105.localdomain 106 32runningxx.xx.xx.xxvps106.localdomain 107 29runningxx.xx.xx.xxvps107.localdomain Looking at the number of processes, can you tell which VPS is running Zimbra? :) 6 of the 7 VPSes are CentOS and the remaining 1 is Debian. Speaking of uptimes, I have a legacy machine at work running Linux-VServer on a 2.4.x series kernel. It had the longest uptime of any machine I've had... and was well over 400 days... when a power outage that outlasted its UPS took it down. That particular machine runs three VPSes that are mail relay/frontends and they get pounded... so that uptime is notable. So, my experience has been that physical failures and power failures (although pretty rare) are more common that kernel panics that take down all of my virtual machines. TYL, -- Scott Dowdle 704 Church Street Belgrade, MT 59714 (406)388-0827 [home] (406)994-3931 [work] ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-virt] i386 VM on x86_64 host in Xen
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 11:27 -0500, Scott Dowdle wrote: There are uses where Xen is much better suited and OpenVZ isn't even a viable option. But there are other cases where OpenVZ is a better fit especially with regards to density and scalability. OpenVZ is also very attractive in those situations where you want to isolate a single or a small number of services... although the vast majority if my deployments have a full set of services. Yes. It's good not to underestimate OS-level virtualization. Many people used chroot to isolate certain processes. OS-level virtualization provides better isolation and control, at only little extra cost. Operating systems that provide binary compatibility for other systems (like the BSDs or Solaris) can also use OS-level virtualization to emulate a complete enviroment that resembles the emulated system. The downside of most (if not virtually all) current OS-level virtualization on Linux is that they do not have proper support for SELinux. I suppose that things get more interesting in that respect when container features are integrated in the mainline kernel. -- Daniel ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-es] Test de Velocidad
En www.google.com buscas: speed test y obtienes paginas con todos los olores y sabores. También tienes una página local que te da un dato más real de la velocidad del canal (al menos el de bajada): www.andinadtos.com.ec (no importa quien sea tu ISP). Alli buscas el link: velocímetro. Edwin - Original Message - From: Eduardo Atenas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: centos-es@centos.org Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 8:10 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Test de Velocidad esta pagina te puede servir, espero http://www.tie.cl/bw espero q te sirva terra creo q tiene otro http://www.terra.cl/multimedia/herramientas/velocidad/portada2.htm - Original Message - From: Lilo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: centos-es@centos.org Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 2:48 PM Subject: [CentOS-es] Test de Velocidad Hola Conocen alguna pagina web o software, para poder hacer el test de velocidad de subida de mi conexion a internet. Garacias __ ¿Chef por primera vez? Sé un mejor Cocinillas. http://es.answers.yahoo.com/info/welcome ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] POstfix con mysql
Hola soy nuevo en linux y kiero instalar mi postfix con mysql, actualmente tengo un centos 5 pero el postfix que este trae no tiene soporte para mysql, me he bajado el src del postfix postfix-2.3.7-1.src.rpm pero no se como recompilarlo para q tenga soporte para mysql, ya me tengo instaldo el rpm-build. 1. Instala los fuentes del postfix (rpm -ivh postfix-2.3.7-1.src.rpm) 2. edita el archivo /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/postfix.spec cambia esta linea %define MYSQL 0 -- %define MYSQL 1 3. compila # cd /usr/src/redhat/ # rpmbuild -ba SPECS/postfix.spec 4 en el directorio RPMS tendras las versiones listas para instalarlas con soporte a MySQL salu2 Esteban -- M.Sc. Ing. Esteban Saavedra Lopez CEO Opentelematics.Bolivia Telefono:(+591.2) 5245959 Celular: +591 72450061 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oruro - Bolivia _ Te Invito a Visitarme y conocer mis Areas de Investigacion http://jesaavedra.opentelematics.org http://esteban.profesionales.org Si quieres chatear ICQ: 16270256 _ ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] POstfix con mysql
On Monday 10 December 2007 23:39:19 Carlos Regalado Bolaños wrote: soy nuevo en linux y kiero instalar mi postfix con mysql, actualmente tengo un centos 5 pero el postfix que este trae no tiene soporte para mysql, me he bajado el src del postfix hasta lo q tengo entendido en el repositorio centosplus hay un postfix con el soporte para mysql habilitado, seria cuestion q habilites ese repo en tu centos o te bajes especifcamente el rpm de postfix de ahi para instalarlo buenamente -- Black Hand/Amiga Addicts powered by GNU/Linux, KDE 3.5.6 and lots of GNU Force ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] [Fwd: Ordenamiento de mensajes con Squirremail. (novato XL)]
Mensaje original Asunto: Ordenamiento de mensajes con Squirremail. (novato XL) De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fecha: Lun, 10 de Diciembre de 2007, 1:10 pm Para: centos-es@centos.org -- Em mi empresa estamos trabajando con Postfix-cyrus-imapd-squirrelmail(apache) que vienen incluidos con CentOS 5.0 y tenemos el siguiente problema: Saludos desde Cuba Al establecer el idioma de las paginas de squirrelmail a espanol, el formato de las fechas de recepcion de los correos es dia(d)/mes(m)/ano() de forma que al mostrarse ordenados por este campo lo hace MAL pues los mensajes se agrupan por dia del mes, mes y por ultimo ano. Si cambio para idioma ingles, entonces el formato de fecha seria mes-dia-ano con el inconveniente de que el mes muestra las tres primeras letras de mes en ingles y con este criterio de ordenamiento Agosto seria el primer mes del ano y Diciembre no estaria lejos. Esta tonteria nos trae de cabeza, pues es la primera maquina completamente desBilGatizada que armamos y queremos que luzca bien. ¿alguna indea para ayudarnos? ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS] Help with UML editor?
A colleague, using CentOS 5 64-bit, installed by me, asked me for the following assistance: The site I was trying to get to was http://www.eclipsedownload.com/. I downloaded the EclipseUML free version, but it's obviously not giving me the information I need. I have Java packages in Eclipse that I would like to display in a class diagram to show how they relate to one another. Theoretically, we have/had licenses for the Omondo tool. I believe the studio edition will do what I need. If we have no licenses, I can download the tool I used previously (http://www.soyatec.com/main.php), but that may have been the cause of my Eclipse crashing. Then again, it crashes once a day or so now, so I don't know if the Soyatec's eUML2 tool will make it any worse. If you find another tool I can use or test, please let me know. I could use it as soon as possible. Thanks for any assistance. Scott ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] After 5.1 update $releasever is still 5
I have performed the 5.1 update via the 5 repo on a couple of systems. I then went to switch these systems to my new local repo using ther $releasever variable. It still has the value of 5, not 5.1 Where is this set? Why was it not changed to 5.1? On the one clean install from the 5.1 isos, $releasever is at 5.1 I think. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Problem with local base repo
Last night my rsync got some 'new' files for the base repo and new repodata. This morning, I set a server to upgrade from 5 to 5.1 by setting it to access my local base and updates repos. I got the following error: Resolving Dependencies -- Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. --- Downloading header for openssh-clients to pack into transaction set. media://1195929637.060433%231/CentOS/openssh-clients-4.3p2-24.el5.i386.rpm: [Errno 4] IOError: urlopen error unknown url type: media Trying other mirror. Error: failed to retrieve CentOS/openssh-clients-4.3p2-24.el5.i386.rpm from base error was [Errno 4] IOError: urlopen error unknown url type: media ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] building a Xen guest image on straight LVM partitions?
Amos, The quickest way to deploy a Xen VM requires a little more prep work... Use the regular (long) method as discussed. Most use an HVM to do the install but config it as a domU afterward as most installers only work reliably in a fully virtualized environment. Create an LVM based guest for each distribution/OS you plan to use. Then for each Xen guest you want to create take an LVM snapshot of the distribution/OS of choice and use that for the guest. This way guest deployment is very quick and disk space is conserved wisely. You can start with 1 or 2 GB snapshot and as space gets tight in the snapshot add more storage. -Ross -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Tue Dec 11 01:50:01 2007 Subject: Re: [CentOS] building a Xen guest image on straight LVM partitions? On 11/12/2007, Ross S. W. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is a good link: http://wiki.rpath.com/wiki/Xen_DomU_Guide Ah and forgot to say thank you for the link. Looks useful. Cheers, --Amos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos __ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] watchdog on gigabyte motherboard
All, I have an GigaByte motherboard GA-M61P-S3 and I was wondering if any kernel watchdog processes will work with that? Jerry - /lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/kernel/drivers/char/watchdog /lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/kernel/drivers/char/watchdog/softdog.ko /lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/kernel/drivers/char/watchdog/ibmasr.ko /lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/kernel/drivers/char/watchdog/pcwd_usb.ko /lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/kernel/drivers/char/watchdog/pcwd_pci.ko /lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/kernel/drivers/char/watchdog/alim7101_wdt.ko /lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/kernel/drivers/char/watchdog/wdt_pci.ko /lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/kernel/drivers/char/watchdog/w83877f_wdt.ko /lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/kernel/drivers/char/watchdog/alim1535_wdt.ko /lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/kernel/drivers/char/watchdog/w83627hf_wdt.ko /lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/kernel/drivers/char/watchdog/i8xx_tco.ko /lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/kernel/drivers/char/watchdog/machzwd.ko /lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/kernel/drivers/char/watchdog/w83977f_wdt.ko /lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/kernel/drivers/char/watchdog/i6300esb.ko /lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/kernel/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_watchdog.ko ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] How to disable hal's polling of CD-ROM drive in CentOS 5.1?
Given that I hardly ever use the CD-ROM drive, it makes no sense to have hal constantly polling it for new media. How can I disable this polling in CentOS 5.1? Thanks. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How to disable hal's polling of CD-ROM drive in CentOS 5.1?
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 10:29 -0500, Steve Snyder wrote: Given that I hardly ever use the CD-ROM drive, it makes no sense to have hal constantly polling it for new media. How can I disable this polling in CentOS 5.1? runlevel 3 Craig ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] unstable kernel after update to CentOS 4.5
Kai: I checked the filesystem in the evening and it's clean. I really doubt there's anything with the disk. That's what I thought too. I had the same error you had, and initially the disk seemed to be OK. It would run for weeks before the error showed up again. But after I replaced the disk, the problem never occurred again. The next time I got this error (on a different system), the drive also seemed fine otherwise. I've learned my lesson. When I see this error I just replace the disk. If you have a spare disk, I would give it a try. If your errors do not go away, then you can suspect something in the CentOS 4.5 update. But that update has been out for a while and I suspect it's running on thousands of systems without this problem. Alfred ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Formating and Mounting Partitions giving problems
Scott Silva wrote: on 12/10/2007 8:59 AM Saurabh Sharma spake the following: Fajar Priyanto wrote: Hello, I believe the options in /etc/fstab should be: defaults,rw ? Not defaults [dot] rw ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Thanks for correcting me ,with the mistake.Now no error were logged and directories were mounted. :-) But the File Sytem type is still FAT16.what's the issue with file system type. I formated the /dev/hdc12 using /mkfs.ext3 /but the file system shown is still FAT16. /[EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# mkfs.ext3 /dev/hdc12 mke2fs 1.39 (29-May-2006) Filesystem label= OS type: Linux Block size=4096 (log=2) Fragment size=4096 (log=2) 2289280 inodes, 4570484 blocks 228524 blocks (5.00%) reserved for the super user First data block=0 Maximum filesystem blocks=0 140 block groups 32768 blocks per group, 32768 fragments per group 16352 inodes per group Superblock backups stored on blocks: 32768, 98304, 163840, 229376, 294912, 819200, 884736, 1605632, 2654208, 4096000 Writing inode tables: done Creating journal (32768 blocks): done Writing superblocks and filesystem accounting information: done This filesystem will be automatically checked every 25 mounts or 180 days, whichever comes first. Use tune2fs -c or -i to override. But what is the partition type set to? If they are set to 0x04 they will show up as fat16, for ext2/3 they need to be 0x83. Thanks for replying,as i'm too new to linux i dont know how to set the partition type,i just google for things and move ahead.Can you please let me know how to get this done or what all you meant.After Scott's comments i just goggled and found parted,which showed partitions type as FAT32,this is just opposite to one shown by fdisk -l. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# parted /dev/hdc print Model: ST3250820A (ide) Disk /dev/hdc: 250GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: msdos Number Start End SizeType File system Flags 1 32.3kB 10.5GB 10.5GB primary ntfs boot 2 10.5GB 250GB 240GB extended lba 5 10.5GB 62.9GB 52.4GB logical fat32 6 62.9GB 115GB 52.4GB logical fat32 7 115GB 168GB 52.4GB logical fat32 8 168GB 220GB 52.4GB logical fat32 9 220GB 220GB 107MB logical ext3 10 220GB 231GB 10.5GB logical ext3 11 231GB 231GB 535MB logical linux-swap 12 231GB 250GB 18.7GB logical ext3 Information: Don't forget to update /etc/fstab, if necessary. Please help me grow...! Thanks and Regards Saurabh Sharma ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Looking for a howto site
Hi I have been googling without success so I thought to ask the following question to the list: I was wondering if any of you know of a site that shows how to setup a wireless access point using Centos. Thanks Alfredo The sauce ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problem with local base repo
Robert Moskowitz wrote on Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:57:33 -0500: error was [Errno 4] IOError: urlopen error unknown url type: media did you check it's there? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS 5 sysreport
I stumbled across this issue because I requested to install the sysreport package in my kickstart file. Anaconda complains that such a package doesn't exist. There is a bug report about this already (http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2492), but it's certainly a strange situation. 1. Anaconda doesn't think the package sysreport exists 2. yum thinks it exists: # yum list sysreport Loading installonlyn plugin Setting up repositories Reading repository metadata in from local files Available Packages sysreport.noarch 1.4.3-13.el5 base 3. But installing with yum fails: # yum install sysreport Loading installonlyn plugin Setting up Install Process Setting up repositories Reading repository metadata in from local files Parsing package install arguments Package sos - 1.7-9.1.el5.noarch already installed and latest version Nothing to do 4. The sysreport file from the sos package fails to run: # sysreport Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/sbin/sysreport, line 31, in ? import sos.policyredhat ImportError: No module named sos.policyredhat 5. But if you extract /usr/sbin/sysreport from the sysreport package using rpm2cpio for instance, it works just fine. So it would be nice if yum would allow installing the sysreport package (see step 3 above) as that would appear to solve all the problems. Alfred ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 sysreport
On Dec 11, 2007 9:46 AM, Alfred von Campe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I stumbled across this issue because I requested to install the sysreport package in my kickstart file. Anaconda complains that such a package doesn't exist. There is a bug report about this already (http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2492), but it's certainly a strange situation. 1. Anaconda doesn't think the package sysreport exists 2. yum thinks it exists: # yum list sysreport Loading installonlyn plugin Setting up repositories Reading repository metadata in from local files Available Packages sysreport.noarch 1.4.3-13.el5 base 3. But installing with yum fails: # yum install sysreport Loading installonlyn plugin Setting up Install Process Setting up repositories Reading repository metadata in from local files Parsing package install arguments Package sos - 1.7-9.1.el5.noarch already installed and latest version Nothing to do 4. The sysreport file from the sos package fails to run: # sysreport Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/sbin/sysreport, line 31, in ? import sos.policyredhat ImportError: No module named sos.policyredhat Hmmm something else is 'borked' on the system. Here it is on a 5.1 updated system: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# sysreport WARNING: sysreport is deprecated, please use sosreport instead. sosreport (version 1.7) This utility will collect some detailed information about the hardware and setup of your Red Hat Enterprise Linux system. The information is collected and an archive is packaged under /tmp, which you can send to a support representative. Red Hat will use this information for diagnostic purposes ONLY and it will be considered confidential information. I do see a bug above... 5. But if you extract /usr/sbin/sysreport from the sysreport package using rpm2cpio for instance, it works just fine. So it would be nice if yum would allow installing the sysreport package (see step 3 above) as that would appear to solve all the problems. Alfred ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. The Merchant of Venice ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How to disable hal's polling of CD-ROM drive in CentOS 5.1?
On Dec 11, 2007 7:29 AM, Steve Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Given that I hardly ever use the CD-ROM drive, it makes no sense to have hal constantly polling it for new media. How can I disable this polling in CentOS 5.1? Stop haldaemon: service haldaemon stop chkconfig haldaemon off ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How to disable hal's polling of CD-ROM drive in CentOS 5.1?
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 10:35:01 am Craig White wrote: On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 10:29 -0500, Steve Snyder wrote: Given that I hardly ever use the CD-ROM drive, it makes no sense to have hal constantly polling it for new media. How can I disable this polling in CentOS 5.1? runlevel 3 I'm already at run level 3. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Clustering MySQL
I'm just beginning to consider using the Clustering available with CentOS. We are going to spec out some new hardware, and after reading most of the Clustering manuals, I have a small question about MySQL. I would like to run High Availability MySQL, in other words, similar to how you can run HA HTTPD and the like. The catch seems to be if I run MySQL on an individual server, with common MySQL replication to another server, how do failovers work? I see a real problem with table locking and the like. Is there a way to run multiple MySQL servers that get removed from the cluster as opposed to failing over when using the newer MySQL versions (I am running 3.23 now, so a little behind)? Thanks for any insights. Steve Campbell ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Newer gamin package for CentOS 4.x?
The gam_server in gamin-0.1.7-1.2.EL4 occasionally goes into an infinite loop (googling indicates there have been problems with this in gam_server for a long time, I see another attempt to fix ... dating from 2004). Does anyone know whether a newer version of gamin has finally fixed this and if so where an RPM or SRPM for the fixed version, suitable for CentOS 4, might be found? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] After 5.1 update $releasever is still 5
Robert Moskowitz wrote: Where is this set? Why was it not changed to 5.1? The question has been answered a few times already, i suggest you do some research on your own part before just blindly writing to the list. On the one clean install from the 5.1 isos, $releasever is at 5.1 I think. either someone changed that manually, or you are wrong. Please confirm if there is indeed a 5.1 being reported as $releasever ? if so, your yum configs are broken or manually modified. CentOS has always had trunk release at the main version number in repo tree's, for CentOS-3, 4 and now 5 -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] unstable kernel after update to CentOS 4.5
Alfred von Campe wrote on Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:55:45 -0500: If you have a spare disk, I would give it a try. Not so easy. This is one of the few machines I have just rented in a datacenter. I had to ask them to image the disk and pay for the service. When it happened tonight again this time I unmounted the device before doing anything else. That worked and kept the machine online. There's then indeed a corrupted directory entry that e2fsck manages to repair easily. As this is always the same inode no. and always happening at the same time (I suspect the updatedb run, although this should not do any changes to that device) I rather suspect a bad block (or a bug). Once I know it's really updatedb doing this I plan on running bad blocks and see if that finds one. Thanks for your telling your experience, I'll keep that in mind. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Clustering MySQL
On Dec 11, 2007 12:18 PM, Steve Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm just beginning to consider using the Clustering available with CentOS. We are going to spec out some new hardware, and after reading most of the Clustering manuals, I have a small question about MySQL. I would like to run High Availability MySQL, in other words, similar to how you can run HA HTTPD and the like. The catch seems to be if I run MySQL on an individual server, with common MySQL replication to another server, how do failovers work? I see a real problem with table locking and the like. Is there a way to run multiple MySQL servers that get removed from the cluster as opposed to failing over when using the newer MySQL versions (I am running 3.23 now, so a little behind)? Thanks for any insights. There are a number of ways to do it. We currently have 1 master mysql server, and multiple replicas. We then load balance the reads only from the replicas and writes go to the master database (all handled in the code). But I saw a presentation at the Boston MySQL Meetup.com group about how to do master-master in mysql 5. We're about to implement this in the next few weeks. If it's done this way both reads and writes to the db can be load balanced. We use linuxvirtualserver.org (heartbeat, ipvsadm and ldirectord) for load balancing. You might be able to contact the Meetup organizer, Sherri http://mysql.meetup.com/137/, she usually posts the presentations online. -- -matt ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Clustering MySQL
Matt Shields wrote: the code). But I saw a presentation at the Boston MySQL Meetup.com group about how to do master-master in mysql 5. We're about to implement this in the next few weeks. If it's done this way both that is imho, a mysql-5.1 only feature, where you can have rbr and multimaster setups that actually work. and 5.1 isnt quite ready for release as yet :D -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Formating and Mounting Partitions giving problems
on 12/11/2007 8:02 AM Saurabh Sharma spake the following: Scott Silva wrote: on 12/10/2007 8:59 AM Saurabh Sharma spake the following: Fajar Priyanto wrote: Hello, I believe the options in /etc/fstab should be: defaults,rw ? Not defaults [dot] rw ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Thanks for correcting me ,with the mistake.Now no error were logged and directories were mounted. :-) But the File Sytem type is still FAT16.what's the issue with file system type. I formated the /dev/hdc12 using /mkfs.ext3 /but the file system shown is still FAT16. /[EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# mkfs.ext3 /dev/hdc12 mke2fs 1.39 (29-May-2006) Filesystem label= OS type: Linux Block size=4096 (log=2) Fragment size=4096 (log=2) 2289280 inodes, 4570484 blocks 228524 blocks (5.00%) reserved for the super user First data block=0 Maximum filesystem blocks=0 140 block groups 32768 blocks per group, 32768 fragments per group 16352 inodes per group Superblock backups stored on blocks: 32768, 98304, 163840, 229376, 294912, 819200, 884736, 1605632, 2654208, 4096000 Writing inode tables: done Creating journal (32768 blocks): done Writing superblocks and filesystem accounting information: done This filesystem will be automatically checked every 25 mounts or 180 days, whichever comes first. Use tune2fs -c or -i to override. But what is the partition type set to? If they are set to 0x04 they will show up as fat16, for ext2/3 they need to be 0x83. Thanks for replying,as i'm too new to linux i dont know how to set the partition type,i just google for things and move ahead.Can you please let me know how to get this done or what all you meant.After Scott's comments i just goggled and found parted,which showed partitions type as FAT32,this is just opposite to one shown by fdisk -l. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# parted /dev/hdc print Model: ST3250820A (ide) Disk /dev/hdc: 250GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: msdos Number Start End SizeType File system Flags 1 32.3kB 10.5GB 10.5GB primary ntfs boot 2 10.5GB 250GB 240GB extended lba 5 10.5GB 62.9GB 52.4GB logical fat326 62.9GB 115GB 52.4GB logical fat327 115GB 168GB 52.4GB logical fat328 168GB 220GB 52.4GB logical fat329 220GB 220GB 107MB logical ext3 10 220GB 231GB 10.5GB logical ext3 11 231GB 231GB 535MB logical linux-swap 12 231GB 250GB 18.7GB logical ext3 Information: Don't forget to update /etc/fstab, if necessary. Please help me grow...! If you run fdisk /dev/hdc, you can change the partition types. At the fdisk prompt, a p will list the partition table. From there you use t to change a partition type. Ext2/3 partitions are type 83 and linux swap is type 82. Make sure you only change the partitions that you wanted to be ext3, and not your windows partitions. A w will write the new table and exit, and a q exits without writing if you make a mistake. A m gives a list of choices (menu). -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 sysreport
On Dec 11, 2007, at 11:56, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: Hmmm something else is 'borked' on the system. Here it is on a 5.1 updated system: Strange, this is my CentOS 5 test system, which was just freshly installed via kickstart (for the 8th time or so). I keep tweaking the kickstart file and my post.sh script. I am using a local repo that gets rsync'ed every night, so unless something is broken in that repo, I don't see what could have possibly messed up this system. I'm about to kickstart it again (I'll comment out the yum update from the post.sh script to see if it makes a difference). I do see a bug above... Well, care to elaborate? Alfred ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Clustering MySQL
On Dec 11, 2007, at 9:42 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: Matt Shields wrote: the code). But I saw a presentation at the Boston MySQL Meetup.com group about how to do master-master in mysql 5. We're about to implement this in the next few weeks. If it's done this way both that is imho, a mysql-5.1 only feature, where you can have rbr and multimaster setups that actually work. and 5.1 isnt quite ready for release as yet :D I'm running a multi-master setup with 5.0 in production with a moderate amount of success. I did try 5.1 a few months ago and it died a horrible, fiery death. You will definitely need auto_increment_increment and auto_increment_offset and replicate-same-server-id set to 0. FYI, I recently took a MySQL High Availability class, and multi-master is definitely not a standard configuration. It was only briefly touched on, and only one other person there had it running in production. But, while it's not officially supported they do their best to make it work. Specifically, what makes you say it is a 5.1 only feature? What does 5.1 give you that makes it easier than 5.0? Ryan -- Ryan Ordway E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unix Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] OSU Libraries, Corvallis, OR 97331Office: Valley Library #4657 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Looking for a howto site
On Dec 11, 2007 8:09 AM, Alfredo Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I have been googling without success so I thought to ask the following question to the list: I was wondering if any of you know of a site that shows how to setup a wireless access point using Centos. Please clarify - are you asking how to use CentOS to access a wireless router, either to set it up or just to use it, or how to use a CentOS machine as a router to be a wireless access point? The former is pretty much just like any other router setup - open a browser to point at the router and set it up like any other (even Windows non-wizard setup). The latter I don't know. Thanks. mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Issues installing x86_64 5.1 on Ultra 40
Hi all, for anyone interested in following this -- ended up having the same issue with RHEL 5.1 and opened a bug (and support request): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=420361 Ray ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] users groups
hi all, i just installed centos 5 with minimal options. i don't have gui yet, how do i get to see all users groups created on my box? thanks, t. hiep ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Help with UML editor?
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007, Scott Ehrlich wrote: A colleague, using CentOS 5 64-bit, installed by me, asked me for the following assistance: The site I was trying to get to was http://www.eclipsedownload.com/. I downloaded the EclipseUML free version, but it's obviously not giving me the information I need. I have Java packages in Eclipse that I would like to display in a class diagram to show how they relate to one another. Theoretically, we have/had licenses for the Omondo tool. I believe the studio edition will do what I need. If we have no licenses, I can download the tool I used previously (http://www.soyatec.com/main.php), but that may have been the cause of my Eclipse crashing. Then again, it crashes once a day or so now, so I don't know if the Soyatec's eUML2 tool will make it any worse. If you find another tool I can use or test, please let me know. I could use it as soon as possible. I'm using ArgoUML with ArchGenXML to develop Plone products. Bill -- INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX:(206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 If you think health care is expensive now, wait until you see what it coses when it's free -- P.J. O'Rourke ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Looking for a howto site
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007, Alfredo Perez wrote: Hi I have been googling without success so I thought to ask the following question to the list: I was wondering if any of you know of a site that shows how to setup a wireless access point using Centos. You might look at http://www.linux-sxs.org/ Bill -- INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX:(206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquillity of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your consul, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains set lightly upon you; and may posterity forget ye were our countrymen. -- Samuel Adams (American Patriot) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] LOTD with CentOS 5
Howdy folks - I just moved my laptop from Fedora to CentOS. FC6 was running rather sweet, then they decided to EOL it, and F8 - while it had some nice new features, it was just way to quirky for me. I no longer enjoy re-installing the OS quite so often, hence my move to CentOS. So I installed CentOS 5 on my laptop, and built a bunch of packages, making yet another repo for CentOS. These are primarily straight rebuilds (in mock) of Fedora 8 source rpm's - taking care to avoid anything that conflicts with or replaces CentOS packages. I know there are a dozen or so addon repos already - and if you are happy with them, stick with them. My goal was to stay as close to Fedora 8 packaging for these addon packages as possible, benefiting from their packaging guidelines, and also to not replace the stable very well tested CentOS packages. [yjl-misc] does not replace any CentOS packages and has stuff from F8 everything like AbiWord, Gnumeric, Bluefish, BitTorrent, etc. as well as some multimedia related libraries. [yjl-livna] has rebuilds of stuff from rpm.livna.org - mostly multimedia related, including xine and totem-xine. Depends on [yjl-misc]. [yjl-php] has php 5.2.5 and does replace the CentOS php, it should probably only be used if something you are doing requires php 5.2.x. For those interested: http://www.pennywasted.info/centos/yjl.php ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Clustering MySQL
- master A is at position X - master B, replicating from A, gets to position X - master A syncs to its filesystem that it's at position X - master A receives some inserts, and is now at position Y - master B, replicating from A, gets to position Y - master A crashes before the position gets synced to filesystem - master A gets rebooted, recovers from innodb log, but has itself only marked at position X - master B requests position Y from master A, but that position doesn't exist yet, so replication breaks. Perhaps someone here knows the proper recovery procedure at this point? If this were master-slave, I'd probably do an LVM Snapshot and get a fresh copy of the master db. The same could be done for master-master. I'm not sure this would work, since some data will have been inserted in on master B as well. I.e., with master-master, a one-way sync won't work. The only recovery option that I can see is to destroy Master A, and copy Master B -- either via an LVM snapshot or shutdown, sync, startup -- to create a new Master A. Maybe this is what you're suggesting? Is there a better way? best, Jeff ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Clustering MySQL
On Dec 11, 2007, at 11:29 AM, Matt Shields wrote: On Dec 11, 2007 1:39 PM, J. Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... But I saw a presentation at the Boston MySQL Meetup.com group about how to do master-master in mysql 5. We're about to implement this in the next few weeks. ... I've run into issues with crash recovery in master-master mode: - master A is at position X - master B, replicating from A, gets to position X - master A syncs to its filesystem that it's at position X - master A receives some inserts, and is now at position Y - master B, replicating from A, gets to position Y - master A crashes before the position gets synced to filesystem - master A gets rebooted, recovers from innodb log, but has itself only marked at position X - master B requests position Y from master A, but that position doesn't exist yet, so replication breaks. Perhaps someone here knows the proper recovery procedure at this point? If this were master-slave, I'd probably do an LVM Snapshot and get a fresh copy of the master db. The same could be done for master-master. The problem is you'll have some inconsistency between your master A's view of the database and the master B's view. You lose any changes to the data on master B. It would be nice to be able to merge any changes from B that hadn't made their way to master A yet. At that point you're examining binlogs. Ryan -- Ryan Ordway E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unix Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] OSU Libraries, Corvallis, OR 97331Office: Valley Library #4657 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Looking for a howto site
on 12/11/2007 11:51 AM Bill Campbell spake the following: On Tue, Dec 11, 2007, Alfredo Perez wrote: Hi I have been googling without success so I thought to ask the following question to the list: I was wondering if any of you know of a site that shows how to setup a wireless access point using Centos. You might look at http://www.linux-sxs.org/ Wow, that site looks like it has been around for a while. I see Caldera stuff there. Quite a collection of info. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] blue-ray disk mounting
Is there a way to mount a blue-ray DVD? it says it is a UDF-fs Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 sysreport
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 01:00:05PM -0500, Alfred von Campe wrote: Well, care to elaborate? Well, sysreport has been deprecated by sos in 5.1 :) Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgpqx2qElAEED.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Problems configuring SAMBA share on remote machine
I'm having problems getting a SAMBA share on a remote (Windows XP) machine to allow me write access to files. I can copy/paste whole files OK from my CentOS 5 box, but can't do any editing of files on the Windows XP machine, which I use as a file server for most of my domestic data (historical reasons for using Windows!). I've tried re-setting permissions to allow write access to the cifs-mounted folders/files, but without success - any suggestions please? Thanks, Andy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Looking for a howto site
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007, Scott Silva wrote: on 12/11/2007 11:51 AM Bill Campbell spake the following: On Tue, Dec 11, 2007, Alfredo Perez wrote: Hi I have been googling without success so I thought to ask the following question to the list: I was wondering if any of you know of a site that shows how to setup a wireless access point using Centos. You might look at http://www.linux-sxs.org/ Wow, that site looks like it has been around for a while. I see Caldera stuff there. Quite a collection of info. It started as an offshoot of the Caldera mailing list, so has been around for years. There is still a very active mailing list with many people who were Caldera users (myself included). It's pretty distribution agnostic these days. Bill -- INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX:(206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 A Galileo could no more be elected president of the United States than he could be elected Pope of Rome. Both high posts are reserved for men favored by God with an extraordinary genius for swathing the bitter facts of life in bandages of self-illusion. -- H. L. Mencken ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] users groups
Hiep Nguyen wrote: hi all, i just installed centos 5 with minimal options. i don't have gui yet, how do i get to see all users groups created on my box? thanks, t. hiep ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi, man useradd and man groupadd :) Have a nice day ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 sysreport
Well, care to elaborate? Well, sysreport has been deprecated by sos in 5.1 :) Oh, that problem. Yeah, well, sosreport has the same problem on my system: it doesn't work. The reason is that /usr/sbin/sysreport is a symlink to /usr/sbin/sosreport: -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 28439 Nov 11 20:02 /usr/sbin/sosreport lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root19 Dec 11 15:24 /usr/sbin/sysreport - / usr/sbin/sosreport I kickstarted the system again, this time without applying the 5.1 updates, and the problem persists. If I remove sos, download the sysreport RPM and install it, I can get sysreport to work (without the above warning). Hold the presses. I just figured out the problem. I had another version of Python in the path ahead of /usr/bin/python. I have everything working now. Sorry for wasting your time on what turned out to be a local configuration issue. Alfred ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Yum update wants to overwrite newer app package
--- MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is probably a dumb question, but I'll ask anyway (I do that - you all know... :-). Due to a bug I found in OOo 2.0, I moved to using OOo 2.3, back when I was still running CentOS 5.0. Now that I have upgraded to 5.1, yum wants to update my OOo from 2.3 BACK to 2.0. Is it possible to get yum to recognize that 2.3 is newer than 2.0, or should I just exclude OOo from the updates? Thanks. mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos I'm thinking its operator error. :-D ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] blue-ray disk mounting
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 03:55:10PM -0500, Jerry Geis alleged: Is there a way to mount a blue-ray DVD? it says it is a UDF-fs Then it might work like a normal DVD with something like 'mount -t udf /dev/something /mnt/somewhere'. pgpaVvNIZ4MSs.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] users groups
Clint Dilks wrote: Hiep Nguyen wrote: hi all, i just installed centos 5 with minimal options. i don't have gui yet, how do i get to see all users groups created on my box? thanks, t. hiep ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi, man useradd and man groupadd :) Have a nice day ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Sorry misread original post please ignore me :) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Newer gamin package for CentOS 4.x?
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 09:29 -0800, Bart Schaefer wrote: The gam_server in gamin-0.1.7-1.2.EL4 occasionally goes into an infinite loop (googling indicates there have been problems with this in gam_server for a long time, I see another attempt to fix ... dating from 2004). Does anyone know whether a newer version of gamin has finally fixed this and if so where an RPM or SRPM for the fixed version, suitable for CentOS 4, might be found? On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 01:44:14PM -0500, Gregg McClintic enlightened us: I have the same issue on my desktop. No fix that I know of at the moment. Causes my cpu to go over threshold sometimes too :) There are (were) two different bugs that chewed up 100% CPU time. One was constantly polling, the other was doing nothing. An updated gamin was released in 4.6 to fix the constant polling problem. I'm not sure if the other has been addressed yet or not. The bugzilla's are in Redhat's systemif you care to look them up. Matt -- Matt Hyclak Department of Mathematics Department of Social Work Ohio University (740) 593-1263 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Problems configuring SAMBA share on remote machine
on 12/11/2007 1:02 PM Andrew Allen spake the following: I'm having problems getting a SAMBA share on a remote (Windows XP) machine to allow me write access to files. I can copy/paste whole files OK from my CentOS 5 box, but can't do any editing of files on the Windows XP machine, which I use as a file server for most of my domestic data (historical reasons for using Windows!). I've tried re-setting permissions to allow write access to the cifs-mounted folders/files, but without success - any suggestions please? It is most likely permissions on the XP machine. Service pack 2 added some more restrictions to remote access, and it might be quite a bit of trial and error to get it working the way you want. Maybe you might need to break from history and do things differently since some of the rules seem to have changed. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Yum update wants to overwrite newer app package
On Dec 11, 2007 1:27 PM, Steven Vishoot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now that I have upgraded to 5.1, yum wants to update my OOo from 2.3 BACK to 2.0. Is it possible to get yum to recognize that 2.3 is newer than 2.0, or should I just exclude OOo from the updates? I'm thinking its operator error. :-D Well, let's assume that you are right (and remember how one spells assume) and see: # rpm -qa | grep -i openoffice openoffice.org-core03u-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-core07-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-onlineupdate-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-writer-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-core04-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-core10-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-mandriva-menus-2.3-9215 openoffice.org-draw-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-core03-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-core09-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-suse-menus-2.3-9215 openoffice.org-headless-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-pyuno-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-core05u-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-redhat-menus-2.3-9215 openoffice.org-core-2.0.4-5.4.24 openoffice.org-calc-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-graphicfilter-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-core04u-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-freedesktop-menus-2.3-9215 openoffice.org-gnome-integration-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-math-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-core01-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-core06-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-emailmerge-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-core05-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-impress-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-core08-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-kde-integration-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-base-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-core02-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-xsltfilter-2.3.0-9221 # yum update Loading installonlyn plugin Setting up Update Process Setting up repositories kbs-CentOS-Extras 100% |=| 951 B00:00 base 100% |=| 1.1 kB00:00 updates 100% |=| 951 B00:00 http://wuarchive.wustl.edu/pub/linux/distributions/centos/5.1/addons/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 500: Internal Server Error Trying other mirror. addons100% |=| 951 B00:00 extras100% |=| 1.1 kB00:00 Reading repository metadata in from local files Resolving Dependencies -- Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. --- Package openoffice.org-calc.x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 set to be updated --- Package openoffice.org-emailmerge.x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 set to be updated --- Package openoffice.org-base.x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 set to be updated --- Package openoffice.org-graphicfilter.x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 set to be updated --- Package openoffice.org-math.x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 set to be updated --- Package openoffice.org-xsltfilter.x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 set to be updated --- Package openoffice.org-impress.x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 set to be updated --- Package openoffice.org-draw.x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 set to be updated --- Package openoffice.org-pyuno.x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 set to be updated --- Package openoffice.org-writer.x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 set to be updated -- Running transaction check Dependencies Resolved = Package Arch Version RepositorySize = Updating: openoffice.org-base x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 base 865 k openoffice.org-calc x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 base 8.1 M openoffice.org-draw x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 base 1.1 M openoffice.org-emailmerge x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 base 63 k openoffice.org-graphicfilter x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 base 209 k openoffice.org-impress x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 base 1.6 M openoffice.org-math x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 base 1.4 M openoffice.org-pyunox86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 base 190 k openoffice.org-writer x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 base 3.1 M openoffice.org-xsltfilter x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 base 97 k Transaction Summary = Install 0 Package(s) Update 10 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 17 M Is this ok [y/N]: Please note: the version number listed in the rpm -qa is 2.3.0, but the version number listed in the yum update confirmation is 2.0.4. I haven't even touched my yum repos.d directories since I added rpmforge back in April. So, if this is operator error, please enlighten me as to where so I can operate better. If by some staggering coincidence it is not operator error, please refrain from making that instant assumption henceforth, mai oui? Merci beaucoup. mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Yum update wants to overwrite newer app package
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 02:13:10PM -0800, MHR enlightened us: --- MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now that I have upgraded to 5.1, yum wants to update my OOo from 2.3 BACK to 2.0. Is it possible to get yum to recognize that 2.3 is newer than 2.0, or should I just exclude OOo from the updates? I'm thinking its operator error. :-D Well, let's assume that you are right (and remember how one spells assume) and see: # rpm -qa | grep -i openoffice openoffice.org-core03u-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-core07-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-onlineupdate-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-writer-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-core04-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-core10-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-mandriva-menus-2.3-9215 openoffice.org-draw-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-core03-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-core09-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-suse-menus-2.3-9215 openoffice.org-headless-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-pyuno-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-core05u-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-redhat-menus-2.3-9215 openoffice.org-core-2.0.4-5.4.24 openoffice.org-calc-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-graphicfilter-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-core04u-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-freedesktop-menus-2.3-9215 openoffice.org-gnome-integration-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-math-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-core01-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-core06-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-emailmerge-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-core05-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-impress-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-core08-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-kde-integration-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-base-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-core02-2.3.0-9221 openoffice.org-xsltfilter-2.3.0-9221 # yum update Loading installonlyn plugin Setting up Update Process Setting up repositories kbs-CentOS-Extras 100% |=| 951 B00:00 base 100% |=| 1.1 kB00:00 updates 100% |=| 951 B00:00 http://wuarchive.wustl.edu/pub/linux/distributions/centos/5.1/addons/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 500: Internal Server Error Trying other mirror. addons100% |=| 951 B00:00 extras100% |=| 1.1 kB00:00 Reading repository metadata in from local files Resolving Dependencies -- Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. --- Package openoffice.org-calc.x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 set to be updated --- Package openoffice.org-emailmerge.x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 set to be updated --- Package openoffice.org-base.x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 set to be updated --- Package openoffice.org-graphicfilter.x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 set to be updated --- Package openoffice.org-math.x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 set to be updated --- Package openoffice.org-xsltfilter.x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 set to be updated --- Package openoffice.org-impress.x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 set to be updated --- Package openoffice.org-draw.x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 set to be updated --- Package openoffice.org-pyuno.x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 set to be updated --- Package openoffice.org-writer.x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 set to be updated -- Running transaction check Dependencies Resolved = Package Arch Version RepositorySize = Updating: openoffice.org-base x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 base 865 k openoffice.org-calc x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 base 8.1 M openoffice.org-draw x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 base 1.1 M openoffice.org-emailmerge x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 base 63 k openoffice.org-graphicfilter x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 base 209 k openoffice.org-impress x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 base 1.6 M openoffice.org-math x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 base 1.4 M openoffice.org-pyunox86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 base 190 k openoffice.org-writer x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 base 3.1 M openoffice.org-xsltfilter x86_64 1:2.0.4-5.4.24 base 97 k Transaction Summary = Install 0 Package(s) Update 10 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 17 M Is this ok [y/N]: Please note: the version number listed in the rpm -qa is 2.3.0, but the version number listed in the yum update confirmation is 2.0.4. I haven't even touched my yum repos.d directories since I added rpmforge back in April. So, if this is operator error, please enlighten me as to where so I can operate better. If by some staggering coincidence it is not operator error, please refrain from making that instant assumption henceforth, mai oui? Merci beaucoup. mhr rpm -qa --queryformat
Re: [CentOS] Problems configuring SAMBA share on remote machine
On Dec 11, 2007 1:02 PM, Andrew Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm having problems getting a SAMBA share on a remote (Windows XP) machine to allow me write access to files. I can copy/paste whole files OK from my CentOS 5 box, but can't do any editing of files on the Windows XP machine, which I use as a file server for most of my domestic data (historical reasons for using Windows!). I've tried re-setting permissions to allow write access to the cifs-mounted folders/files, but without success - any suggestions please? Thanks, Andy Hope this wiki helps: http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/WindowsShares Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] vsifax on Centos 5.1
All I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker staff have been helpful but no cigar. At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received the same error. One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called eula which fails. ./eula: cannot execute binary file The tech support of vsifax advised me they had one other customer use Centos 4.5 and succeeded in a vsifax installation. I was hoping whoever had the other vsifax installation might be listening to this list and could give me a hand. Thanks much!!! Greg Ennis ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] yum --security and staying with 5.0
Hello, So I've watched a few threads about the new 5.0 vs. 5.1 upgrade and have a couple of (hopefully) practical questions about this: Context - I'd like to stick to 5.0 at least for a while until the dust around 5.1 settles down (and I'm back from holidays). As an example - In Debian, as long as I stick to stable I can be sure that the only updates I receive there are for heavily tested very important bugs and security issues, so I should generally apply them. 1. If I read the FAQ correctly, in order to force yum to stay with 5.0 should I just manually edit /etc/redhat-release from: CentOS release 5 (Final) to: CentOS release 5.0 (Final) (i.e. add .0 to the version)? If not then what should I do? 2. I am hoping that yum-security will allow me to stick to the latest security updates for 5.0 without forcing me to upgrade to 5.1 until the dust settles down. Am I correct that this is possible with yum-security and the repositories provided by CentOS? Will yum update --security update packages with later versions only if those versions fix security issues? Are security updates maintained for 5.0? Here is what I get right now on one of my systems (without doing the change I asked about in (1)): # yum --security list updates Loading security plugin Loading installonlyn plugin Setting up repositories base 100% |=| 1.1 kB00:00 updates 100% |=| 951 B00:00 addons100% |=| 951 B00:00 extras100% |=| 1.1 kB00:00 Reading repository metadata in from local files Limiting package lists to security relevant ones No packages needed, for security, 196 available If I drop the --security flag I indeed get a list of196 packages to upgrade. So to clarify my question - is my system secure (in terms of package versions) by sticking to yum update --security? Thanks, --Amos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Clustering MySQL
Ryan Ordway wrote: Specifically, what makes you say it is a 5.1 only feature? What does 5.1 give you that makes it easier than 5.0? specifically - rbr we've had load of issues with mysql-5.0 recently ( i think were just tryign to use mysql like too much of a real database, while we seem to have clearly outgrown its capabilities :( ) issues like cascading deletes not working as yet in replicas, and quite a few issues with stored proc's etc. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Clustering MySQL
On Dec 11, 2007, at 2:44 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: Ryan Ordway wrote: Specifically, what makes you say it is a 5.1 only feature? What does 5.1 give you that makes it easier than 5.0? specifically - rbr Ahh, true. ( i think were just tryign to use mysql like too much of a real database, while we seem to have clearly outgrown its capabilities :( ) I think the MySQL AB folks would object to that statement. ;-) Ryan -- Ryan Ordway E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unix Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] OSU Libraries, Corvallis, OR 97331Office: Valley Library #4657 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum --security and staying with 5.0
Amos Shapira wrote: Context - I'd like to stick to 5.0 at least for a while until the dust around 5.1 settles down (and I'm back from holidays). ok, so what do you mean by sticking to 5.0 ? you mean you dont want any updates at all for those machines, even if they might be security issues ? As an example - In Debian, as long as I stick to stable I can be sure that the only updates I receive there are for heavily tested very important bugs and security issues, so I should generally apply them. CentOS does not follow the debian release model. 1. If I read the FAQ correctly, in order to force yum to stay with 5.0 should I just manually edit /etc/redhat-release from: CentOS release 5 (Final) to: CentOS release 5.0 (Final) no, there is no such mention abut anything in the FAQ or anywhere else that I can find. What made you believe that changing stuff in that text file will change the repo's your machine is looking at ? 2. I am hoping that yum-security will allow me to stick to the latest security updates for 5.0 without forcing me to upgrade to 5.1 until read the release notes about yum-security -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Clustering MySQL
Matt Shields wrote: If this were master-slave, I'd probably do an LVM Snapshot and get a fresh copy of the master db. The same could be done for master-master. has a live lvm-snapshot ever worked for you as a real move-data-around policy ? you would, at the very least, need to flush in memory data, and have a system wide write lock in place while the snapshot is created. its been a tempting idea, but so far of the few people I know having tried this lvm snapshoting, have never actually managed to get it working right for mysql dumps. So, would be good to hear from someone who has it working. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Clustering MySQL
Ryan Ordway wrote: The problem is you'll have some inconsistency between your master A's view of the database and the master B's view. You lose any changes to the data on master B. It would be nice to be able to merge any changes from B that hadn't made their way to master A yet. At that point you're examining binlogs. I wonder if someone has spent the time to write such a tool, that would workout what this diff/delta was, and then be able to bring both machines upto speed, so after a period of time ( hopefully short ), they would both be in the same state. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.0-- 5.1 lm_sensors General Parse Error
John Thomas wrote: My kernel is 2.6.18-53.el5.centos.plus-i686, but I figured I must of gotten me some backported stuff in there (i.e. I'm in over my head). I upgraded to the lm_sensors in ATRPMS testing repo, and the problem went away. (lm_sensors-2.10.5-52.el5) I had the same problem with a clean fresh install of CentOS 5.1, kernel 2.6.18-53.1.4.el5 Installing the lm_sensors-2.10.5-52.el5.x86_64.rpm package from ATrpms fixed the problem. Looks like it's a bug in 5.1, either in the kernel or in the lm_sensors packages. -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Clustering MySQL
Ryan Ordway wrote: Ryan Ordway wrote: Specifically, what makes you say it is a 5.1 only feature? What does 5.1 give you that makes it easier than 5.0? specifically - rbr Ahh, true. ( i think were just tryign to use mysql like too much of a real database, while we seem to have clearly outgrown its capabilities :( ) I think the MySQL AB folks would object to that statement. ;-) reality is what it is, I have zero problems with working through the issues with them if they choose to do so. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Clustering MySQL
Ryan Ordway wrote: ( i think were just tryign to use mysql like too much of a real database, while we seem to have clearly outgrown its capabilities :( ) I think the MySQL AB folks would object to that statement. ;-) you mean the folks who scoffed at the idea transactions were important, or the folks that treat 'foreign key' as a comment ? :-D ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] vsifax on Centos 5.1
Does eula stand for End User Licensing Agreement, perhaps? Just a guess. If it's a script why don't you just look in it (the calling script) and see what it's doing? Also, maybe the eula binary exists (did you look for it?) but is not executable, which should be easy to fix. Gregory P. Ennis wrote: All I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker staff have been helpful but no cigar. At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received the same error. One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called eula which fails. ./eula: cannot execute binary file The tech support of vsifax advised me they had one other customer use Centos 4.5 and succeeded in a vsifax installation. I was hoping whoever had the other vsifax installation might be listening to this list and could give me a hand. Thanks much!!! Greg Ennis ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Liam Kirsher PGP: http://liam.numenet.com/pgp/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] vsifax on Centos 5.1
All I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker staff have been helpful but no cigar. At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received the same error. One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called eula which fails. ./eula: cannot execute binary file maybe just retry after invoking that command ? chmod +x eula ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Tons of SNMP ?errors? in /var/log/messages
I'm running up-to-date CentOS 5 w/ Xen. I'm getting tons (tons = 13787 just yesterday, presumably because I have a monitoring system poll every 5 minutes) of log entries of the following: netsnmp_assert index == tmp failed if-mib/data_access/interface.c:467 _access_interface_entry_save_name() and netsnmp_assert rc == 0 failed if-mib/ifTable/ifTable_data_access.c:209 _check_interface_entry_for_updates() When I do an SNMPWalk, everything looks ok (now that IPv6 is back on) on the host doing the walking, but on the other side it is spewing the above messages. I have not been able to find out anything about these. I had IPv6 turned off (by the alias net-pf-10 off method), but in troubleshooting these messages I turned it back on (because there were other snmpd messages complaining about unable to find ipv6 entries). Anyone have some knowledge about this? --Tim ___ / No one regards what is before his feet; we all gaze at the stars. \ \ -- Quintus Ennius / --- \ \ \ \ /\ ( ) .( o ). ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] vsifax on Centos 5.1
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 00:56 +0100, Vincent Knecht wrote: All I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker staff have been helpful but no cigar. At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received the same error. One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called eula which fails. ./eula: cannot execute binary file maybe just retry after invoking that command ? chmod +x eula Thanks for the suggestion. I probably should have posted the deails. I was actually hoping that the protections was the issue but looks to me that it is not Greg -rwxr-xr-x 1 227 105 374644 Apr 19 2007 eula ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] vsifax on Centos 5.1
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:32 -0800, Liam Kirsher wrote:
Does eula stand for End User Licensing Agreement, perhaps? Just a guess.
If it's a script why don't you just look in it (the calling script) and
see what it's doing?
Also, maybe the eula binary exists (did you look for it?) but is not
executable, which should be easy to fix.
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
All
I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker
staff have been helpful but no cigar.
At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine
so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received
the same error.
One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called
eula which fails.
./eula: cannot execute binary file
The tech support of vsifax advised me they had one other customer use
Centos 4.5 and succeeded in a vsifax installation.
I was hoping whoever had the other vsifax installation might be
listening to this list and could give me a hand.
Thanks much!!!
Greg Ennis
___
The vsifax documentation does not declare what the file is, but their
installation scripts try to execute the 'eula' file and and fails. In
looking at the contents of the file it is not a simple script, but looks
like a binary executable file. I tried to execute the file manually and
received the same error :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] install]# ./eula
-bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file
The file is executable :
-rwxr-xr-x 1 227 105 374644 Apr 19 2007 eula
The file is not a script, The beginning of the file is :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'90[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@f98[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^A( [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@^A([EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL
PROTECTED]94[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@^@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@^@ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
PROTECTED]@f98[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@^@80[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^@82[EMAIL
PROTECTED]|n^[x|8f#x|°+x|^^ø^@91[EMAIL PROTECTED]@91[EMAIL
PROTECTED]82[EMAIL PROTECTED]@81B^@(9 [EMAIL PROTECTED]@e)[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@91[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@82[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^@91[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]83[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@^A8180[EMAIL PROTECTED]|n^[xA8a[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@90[EMAIL PROTECTED]| ^C¦80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80^D!80[EMAIL
PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@}Ãsx}ä{x~^E83x91[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@80[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@A82[EMAIL PROTECTED]80b^@ H^B^T8180[EMAIL
PROTECTED]|81[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] @[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@^@80[EMAIL PROTECTED]|^H^B¦,[EMAIL PROTECTED]@94!ÿÀ90[EMAIL
PROTECTED]82[EMAIL PROTECTED]81[EMAIL PROTECTED]@90[EMAIL
PROTECTED]81[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL
PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@A82[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]@81[EMAIL
PROTECTED]|^H^C¦80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL
PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]@A82[EMAIL
PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]@81[EMAIL PROTECTED]|^H^C¦80[EMAIL
PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL
PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]@A82[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@81[EMAIL PROTECTED]|^H^C¦80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL
PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@A82[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]@81[EMAIL
PROTECTED]|^H^C¦80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL
Re: [CentOS] vsifax on Centos 5.1
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:32 -0800, Liam Kirsher wrote:
Does eula stand for End User Licensing Agreement, perhaps? Just a guess.
If it's a script why don't you just look in it (the calling script) and
see what it's doing?
Also, maybe the eula binary exists (did you look for it?) but is not
executable, which should be easy to fix.
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
All
I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker
staff have been helpful but no cigar.
At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine
so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received
the same error.
One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called
eula which fails.
./eula: cannot execute binary file
The tech support of vsifax advised me they had one other customer use
Centos 4.5 and succeeded in a vsifax installation.
I was hoping whoever had the other vsifax installation might be
listening to this list and could give me a hand.
Thanks much!!!
Greg Ennis
___
The vsifax documentation does not declare what the file is, but their
installation scripts try to execute the 'eula' file and and fails. In
looking at the contents of the file it is not a simple script, but looks
like a binary executable file. I tried to execute the file manually and
received the same error :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] install]# ./eula
-bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file
The file is executable :
-rwxr-xr-x 1 227 105 374644 Apr 19 2007 eula
The file is not a script, The beginning of the file is :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'90[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@f98[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^A( [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^A([EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]94[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@^@ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
PROTECTED]@f98[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^@80[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^@82[EMAIL
PROTECTED]|n^[x|8f#x|°+x|^^ø^@91[EMAIL PROTECTED]@91[EMAIL PROTECTED]82[EMAIL PROTECTED]@81B^@(9 [EMAIL PROTECTED]@e)[EMAIL PROTECTED]@91[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@82[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^@91[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]83[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^A8180[EMAIL PROTECTED]|n^[xA8a[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]@90[EMAIL PROTECTED]| ^C¦80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80^D!80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@}Ãsx}ä{x~^E83x91[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@80[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]@A82[EMAIL PROTECTED]80b^@ H^B^T8180[EMAIL PROTECTED]|81[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] @[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^@80[EMAIL PROTECTED]|^H^B¦,[EMAIL PROTECTED]@94!ÿÀ90[EMAIL PROTECTED]82[EMAIL PROTECTED]81[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@90[EMAIL PROTECTED]81[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]@A82[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]@81[EMAIL PROTECTED]|^H^C¦80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]@A82[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]@81[EMAIL PROTECTED]|^H^C¦80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL
PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]@A82[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]@81[EMAIL PROTECTED]|^H^C¦80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]@A82[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]@81[EMAIL PROTECTED]|^H^C¦80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]8181[EMAIL
Re: [CentOS] vsifax on Centos 5.1
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 15:47 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:32 -0800, Liam Kirsher wrote:
Does eula stand for End User Licensing Agreement, perhaps? Just a guess.
If it's a script why don't you just look in it (the calling script) and
see what it's doing?
Also, maybe the eula binary exists (did you look for it?) but is not
executable, which should be easy to fix.
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
All
I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker
staff have been helpful but no cigar.
At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine
so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received
the same error.
One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called
eula which fails.
./eula: cannot execute binary file
The tech support of vsifax advised me they had one other customer use
Centos 4.5 and succeeded in a vsifax installation.
I was hoping whoever had the other vsifax installation might be
listening to this list and could give me a hand.
Thanks much!!!
Greg Ennis
___
The vsifax documentation does not declare what the file is, but their
installation scripts try to execute the 'eula' file and and fails. In
looking at the contents of the file it is not a simple script, but looks
like a binary executable file. I tried to execute the file manually and
received the same error :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] install]# ./eula
-bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file
The file is executable :
-rwxr-xr-x 1 227 105 374644 Apr 19 2007 eula
The file is not a script, The beginning of the file is :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'90[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@f98[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^A( [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^A([EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]94[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@^@ [EMAIL
PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]@f98[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ [EMAIL
PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@^@80[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@^@82[EMAIL PROTECTED]|n^[x|8f#x|°+x|^^ø^@91[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@91[EMAIL PROTECTED]82[EMAIL PROTECTED]@81B^@(9 [EMAIL
PROTECTED]@e)[EMAIL PROTECTED]@91[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@82[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@^@91[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]83[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^A8180[EMAIL PROTECTED]|n^[xA8a[EMAIL
PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]@90[EMAIL PROTECTED]| ^C¦80[EMAIL
PROTECTED]80^D!80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@}Ãsx}ä{x~^E83x91[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@80[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]@A82[EMAIL
PROTECTED]80b^@ H^B^T8180[EMAIL PROTECTED]|81[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] @[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@^@80[EMAIL PROTECTED]|^H^B¦,[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@94!ÿÀ90[EMAIL PROTECTED]82[EMAIL PROTECTED]81[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@90[EMAIL PROTECTED]81[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL
PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL
PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]@A82[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@81[EMAIL PROTECTED]|^H^C¦80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL
PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@A82[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]@81[EMAIL
PROTECTED]|^H^C¦80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL
PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]@A82[EMAIL
PROTECTED]80[EMAIL
Re: [CentOS] vsifax on Centos 5.1
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 16:12 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 15:47 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:32 -0800, Liam Kirsher wrote:
Does eula stand for End User Licensing Agreement, perhaps? Just a guess.
If it's a script why don't you just look in it (the calling script) and
see what it's doing?
Also, maybe the eula binary exists (did you look for it?) but is not
executable, which should be easy to fix.
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
All
I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker
staff have been helpful but no cigar.
At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine
so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received
the same error.
One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called
eula which fails.
./eula: cannot execute binary file
The tech support of vsifax advised me they had one other customer use
Centos 4.5 and succeeded in a vsifax installation.
I was hoping whoever had the other vsifax installation might be
listening to this list and could give me a hand.
Thanks much!!!
Greg Ennis
___
The vsifax documentation does not declare what the file is, but their
installation scripts try to execute the 'eula' file and and fails. In
looking at the contents of the file it is not a simple script, but looks
like a binary executable file. I tried to execute the file manually and
received the same error :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] install]# ./eula
-bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file
The file is executable :
-rwxr-xr-x 1 227 105 374644 Apr 19 2007 eula
The file is not a script, The beginning of the file is :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'90[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@f98[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^A( [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^A([EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]94[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^@
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^@ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
PROTECTED]@f98[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^@80[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^@82[EMAIL
PROTECTED]|n^[x|8f#x|°+x|^^ø^@91[EMAIL PROTECTED]@91[EMAIL
PROTECTED]82[EMAIL PROTECTED]@81B^@(9 [EMAIL PROTECTED]@e)[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@91[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@82[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^@91[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]83[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@^A8180[EMAIL PROTECTED]|n^[xA8a[EMAIL
PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]@90[EMAIL PROTECTED]| ^C¦80[EMAIL
PROTECTED]80^D!80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@}Ãsx}ä{x~^E83x91[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@80[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]@A82[EMAIL
PROTECTED]80b^@ H^B^T8180[EMAIL PROTECTED]|81[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] @[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@^@80[EMAIL PROTECTED]|^H^B¦,[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@94!ÿÀ90[EMAIL PROTECTED]82[EMAIL PROTECTED]81[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@90[EMAIL PROTECTED]81[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL
PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL
PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]@A82[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@81[EMAIL PROTECTED]|^H^C¦80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL
PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@A82[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]@81[EMAIL
PROTECTED]|^H^C¦80[EMAIL
Re: [CentOS] vsifax on Centos 5.1
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 15:47 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:32 -0800, Liam Kirsher wrote:
Does eula stand for End User Licensing Agreement, perhaps? Just a guess.
If it's a script why don't you just look in it (the calling script) and
see what it's doing?
Also, maybe the eula binary exists (did you look for it?) but is not
executable, which should be easy to fix.
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
All
I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker
staff have been helpful but no cigar.
At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine
so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received
the same error.
One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called
eula which fails.
./eula: cannot execute binary file
The tech support of vsifax advised me they had one other customer use
Centos 4.5 and succeeded in a vsifax installation.
I was hoping whoever had the other vsifax installation might be
listening to this list and could give me a hand.
Thanks much!!!
Greg Ennis
___
The vsifax documentation does not declare what the file is, but their
installation scripts try to execute the 'eula' file and and fails. In
looking at the contents of the file it is not a simple script, but looks
like a binary executable file. I tried to execute the file manually and
received the same error :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] install]# ./eula
-bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file
The file is executable :
-rwxr-xr-x 1 227 105 374644 Apr 19 2007 eula
The file is not a script, The beginning of the file is :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'90[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@f98[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^A( [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^A([EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]94[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@^@ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
PROTECTED]@f98[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^@80[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^@82[EMAIL
PROTECTED]|n^[x|8f#x|°+x|^^ø^@91[EMAIL PROTECTED]@91[EMAIL PROTECTED]82[EMAIL PROTECTED]@81B^@(9 [EMAIL PROTECTED]@e)[EMAIL PROTECTED]@91[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@82[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^@91[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]83[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^A8180[EMAIL PROTECTED]|n^[xA8a[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]@90[EMAIL PROTECTED]| ^C¦80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80^D!80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@}Ãsx}ä{x~^E83x91[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@80[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]@A82[EMAIL PROTECTED]80b^@ H^B^T8180[EMAIL PROTECTED]|81[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] @[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^@80[EMAIL PROTECTED]|^H^B¦,[EMAIL PROTECTED]@94!ÿÀ90[EMAIL PROTECTED]82[EMAIL PROTECTED]81[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@90[EMAIL PROTECTED]81[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]@A82[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]@81[EMAIL PROTECTED]|^H^C¦80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]@A82[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]@81[EMAIL PROTECTED]|^H^C¦80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL
PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]@A82[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]@81[EMAIL PROTECTED]|^H^C¦80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]@A82[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL
Re: [CentOS] vsifax on Centos 5.1
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 16:12 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 15:47 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:32 -0800, Liam Kirsher wrote:
Does eula stand for End User Licensing Agreement, perhaps? Just a guess.
If it's a script why don't you just look in it (the calling script) and
see what it's doing?
Also, maybe the eula binary exists (did you look for it?) but is not
executable, which should be easy to fix.
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
All
I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker
staff have been helpful but no cigar.
At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine
so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received
the same error.
One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called
eula which fails.
./eula: cannot execute binary file
The tech support of vsifax advised me they had one other customer use
Centos 4.5 and succeeded in a vsifax installation.
I was hoping whoever had the other vsifax installation might be
listening to this list and could give me a hand.
Thanks much!!!
Greg Ennis
___
The vsifax documentation does not declare what the file is, but their
installation scripts try to execute the 'eula' file and and fails. In
looking at the contents of the file it is not a simple script, but looks
like a binary executable file. I tried to execute the file manually and
received the same error :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] install]# ./eula
-bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file
The file is executable :
-rwxr-xr-x 1 227 105 374644 Apr 19 2007 eula
The file is not a script, The beginning of the file is :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'90[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@f98[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^A( [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^A([EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]94[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@^@ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
PROTECTED]@f98[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^@80[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^@82[EMAIL
PROTECTED]|n^[x|8f#x|°+x|^^ø^@91[EMAIL PROTECTED]@91[EMAIL PROTECTED]82[EMAIL PROTECTED]@81B^@(9 [EMAIL PROTECTED]@e)[EMAIL PROTECTED]@91[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@82[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^@91[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]83[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^A8180[EMAIL PROTECTED]|n^[xA8a[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]@90[EMAIL PROTECTED]| ^C¦80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80^D!80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@}Ãsx}ä{x~^E83x91[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@80[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]@A82[EMAIL PROTECTED]80b^@ H^B^T8180[EMAIL PROTECTED]|81[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] @[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^@80[EMAIL PROTECTED]|^H^B¦,[EMAIL PROTECTED]@94!ÿÀ90[EMAIL PROTECTED]82[EMAIL PROTECTED]81[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@90[EMAIL PROTECTED]81[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]@A82[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]@81[EMAIL PROTECTED]|^H^C¦80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]@A82[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]@81[EMAIL PROTECTED]|^H^C¦80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL
PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]@A82[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]@81[EMAIL
Re: [CentOS] vsifax on Centos 5.1
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 16:36 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 16:12 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 15:47 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote:
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:32 -0800, Liam Kirsher wrote:
Does eula stand for End User Licensing Agreement, perhaps? Just a
guess.
If it's a script why don't you just look in it (the calling script) and
see what it's doing?
Also, maybe the eula binary exists (did you look for it?) but is not
executable, which should be easy to fix.
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
All
I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The
Esker
staff have been helpful but no cigar.
At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine
so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and
received
the same error.
One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called
eula which fails.
./eula: cannot execute binary file
The tech support of vsifax advised me they had one other customer use
Centos 4.5 and succeeded in a vsifax installation.
I was hoping whoever had the other vsifax installation might be
listening to this list and could give me a hand.
Thanks much!!!
Greg Ennis
___
The vsifax documentation does not declare what the file is, but their
installation scripts try to execute the 'eula' file and and fails. In
looking at the contents of the file it is not a simple script, but looks
like a binary executable file. I tried to execute the file manually and
received the same error :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] install]# ./eula
-bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file
The file is executable :
-rwxr-xr-x 1 227 105 374644 Apr 19 2007 eula
The file is not a script, The beginning of the file is :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'90[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@f98[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^A( [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^A([EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]94[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^@
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^@ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
PROTECTED]@f98[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@^@80[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@^@82[EMAIL PROTECTED]|n^[x|8f#x|°+x|^^ø^@91[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@91[EMAIL PROTECTED]82[EMAIL PROTECTED]@81B^@(9 [EMAIL
PROTECTED]@e)[EMAIL PROTECTED]@91[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@82[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@^@91[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]83[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^A8180[EMAIL
PROTECTED]|n^[xA8a[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]@90[EMAIL
PROTECTED]| ^C¦80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80^D!80[EMAIL
PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@}Ãsx}ä{x~^E83x91[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@80[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@A82[EMAIL PROTECTED]80b^@ H^B^T8180[EMAIL
PROTECTED]|81[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@^@80[EMAIL PROTECTED]|^H^B¦,[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@94!ÿÀ90[EMAIL PROTECTED]82[EMAIL PROTECTED]81[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@90[EMAIL PROTECTED]81[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL
PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL
PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]@A82[EMAIL PROTECTED]80[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@81[EMAIL PROTECTED]|^H^C¦80[EMAIL
Re: [CentOS] Yum update wants to overwrite newer app package
On Dec 11, 2007 2:17 PM, Matt Hyclak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 02:13:10PM -0800, MHR enlightened us:
Please note: the version number listed in the rpm -qa is 2.3.0, but the
version number listed in the yum update confirmation is 2.0.4.
rpm -qa --queryformat %{epoch}:%{name}-%{release}-%{version}.%{arch}
openoffice*
I bet they have an epoch of 0, but the 2.0.4 packages have an epoch of 1,
which means they are newer, even though the version number is smaller.
They work like the 2.0 version from before, meaning the same bug I moved to
2.3 to avoid.
So, I guess I'll put in an exclude until something else changes.
Thanks.
mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] module mppe with pptpd causes kernel crash
On Dec 10, 2007 8:08 AM, David Hláčik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was thinking that CentOS 5.1 has allready a kernel patched , but as it seems NOT. Or am i wrong? If upstream has not patched it, CentOS would not have either. It appears from the Red Hat Bugzilla entry that this is a likely candidate for inclusion in 5.2 (assuming the patch is accepted upstream - kernel.org that is for Red Hat). The bug is currently in POST state, which means that the patch has been submitted upstream but not yet included. In the meantime, you're free to use the patch provided in the Bugzilla. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum --security and staying with 5.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Karanbir Singh wrote: Amos Shapira wrote: 1. If I read the FAQ correctly, in order to force yum to stay with 5.0 should I just manually edit /etc/redhat-release from: CentOS release 5 (Final) to: CentOS release 5.0 (Final) no, there is no such mention abut anything in the FAQ or anywhere else that I can find. What made you believe that changing stuff in that text file will change the repo's your machine is looking at ? Possibly this: http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOS5#q8 - -- David Goldsmith, SANS NOC SANS Institute (www.sans.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHX2Hs417vU8/9QfkRAs/RAJ97SpViDVo5glViEQgFnOcEyyGnIACfVOk7 YlZdsWY+q0l4DNCY47LKc1A= =YRNh -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Clustering MySQL
On Dec 11, 2007 6:10 PM, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matt Shields wrote: If this were master-slave, I'd probably do an LVM Snapshot and get a fresh copy of the master db. The same could be done for master-master. has a live lvm-snapshot ever worked for you as a real move-data-around policy ? you would, at the very least, need to flush in memory data, and have a system wide write lock in place while the snapshot is created. its been a tempting idea, but so far of the few people I know having tried this lvm snapshoting, have never actually managed to get it working right for mysql dumps. So, would be good to hear from someone who has it working. I didn't put all the details, we have a custom script that we run which locks the tables, does a flush, starts a lvm snapshot. We can then copy the mysql data, when the copy is done we've got a script to release the snapshot. The thing you need to remember when you image the server is to make sure you leave some unused diskspace on your partition. So for example if you have a 100GB drive, put it all into the pv and lv, but only create a 80GB vg. That gives you 20GB for the snapshot. Of course when calculating how much extra space you need, you need to think about how fast your data grows and how much time you need to do a copy of the data. If your snapshot is too small and you outgrow the snapshot before you've finished copying your data, then the snapshot will expire. Works great for us in our master - multiple slave environment. Some of our slaves even have slaves. :) -- -matt ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos 5.1 install on thumbdrive
--- Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark Pryor wrote: There was an effort to release a live C5, but I lost track of it. Since RHEL isn't going in that direction, I don't expect (or want) to see a CentOS splinter group trying to pick up where RHEL is lacking. hummm, there is a livecd for centos-5.0 and we are working on the livecd for 5.1, what gives you the impression that the project was scraped ? My apologies. I took another look at my favorite mirror and there is one: http://mirrors.kernel.org/centos/5.0/isos/i386/CentOS-5.0-i386-LiveCD.iso An ISO like this can easily be converted from ISOLINUX to SYSLINUX for booting on USB flash. To run any Linux on USB flash stick with a LIVE version. -- Mark Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum --security and staying with 5.0
Amos Shapira wrote: On 12/12/2007, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Amos Shapira wrote: Context - I'd like to stick to 5.0 at least for a while until the dust around 5.1 settles down (and I'm back from holidays). ok, so what do you mean by sticking to 5.0 ? you mean you dont want any updates at all for those machines, even if they might be security issues ? (I also replied to David's message) No. I'm trying to understand where does 5.0 stand now that 5.1 is out - should I abandon 5.0 and upgrade to 5.1 if I want to stick to secure, stable releases or is 5.0 going to be maintained in parallel to 5.0 for security issues? From your response so far I suspect that it's the former (must upgrade to 5.1). As an example - In Debian, as long as I stick to stable I can be sure that the only updates I receive there are for heavily tested very important bugs and security issues, so I should generally apply them. CentOS does not follow the debian release model. This idea is beginning to sink in :^). I just though that RHEL/CentOS is all about providing rock-solid, tested stable releases but there are some noises on the net that the new release might be giving early adopters some rough time. 1. If I read the FAQ correctly, in order to force yum to stay with 5.0 should I just manually edit /etc/redhat-release from: CentOS release 5 (Final) to: CentOS release 5.0 (Final) no, there is no such mention abut anything in the FAQ or anywhere else that I can find. What made you believe that changing stuff in that text file will change the repo's your machine is looking at ? It doesn't explicitly say so but as David pointed out, http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOS5#q8 talks about the content of this file as a way to know where the system thinks it belongs to now. I now noticed the last sentence saying you are in the update release stream for the 5.1 series and you will not move to a newer release without making changes to the yum config.. What kind of changes does this refer to? Overriding the $releasever in the repository URL's to hard-coded 5.0 or what? Thanks, --Amos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi Amos My understanding is that unless you choose not to update your system at all you can not freeze on a point release. So install from any 5.* media and when you update you will go to the latest point release. What I would suggest if you are really worried about this is to configure /etc/yum.conf with a keepcache higher than 1 so that if an update is done you can roll back the rpm I hope this helps ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How to disable hal's polling of CD-ROM drive in CentOS 5.1?
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 10:29 -0500, Steve Snyder wrote: Given that I hardly ever use the CD-ROM drive, it makes no sense to have hal constantly polling it for new media. How can I disable this polling in CentOS 5.1? Run lshal and look for the block.device value that matches your drive. Then find the value of the info.udi key in the same block and replace it into the attached file. Then drop the file in /etc/hal/fdi/information and restart haldaemon. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams [EMAIL PROTECTED] PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed media-check-disable-cd.fdi Description: XML document signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
