Re: [CentOS] yum error "AttributeError: LOCATION_BASE" after 4.5 -> 4.6 upgrade

2007-12-25 Thread Lorenzo Martínez Rodríguez
Joe Klemmer escribió:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I am having a problem running yum after doing the 4.6 upgrade.  I
> did a live update through yum and no problems were encountered. 
> However, now when I try to run yum (with any commands/options) I get
> this error right after loading/reading the repo's -
>
> eading repository metadata in from local files
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/bin/yum", line 29, in ?
> yummain.main(sys.argv[1:])
>   File "/usr/share/yum-cli/yummain.py", line 102, in main
> result, resultmsgs = do()
>   File "/usr/share/yum-cli/cli.py", line 489, in doCommands
> ypl = self.returnPkgLists()
>   File "/usr/share/yum-cli/cli.py", line 1085, in returnPkgLists
> ypl = self.doPackageLists(pkgnarrow=pkgnarrow)
>   File "__init__.py", line 993, in doPackageLists
>   File "packageSack.py", line 148, in searchNevra
>   File "packageSack.py", line 236, in _computeAggregateListResult
>   File "sqlitesack.py", line 514, in searchNevra
>   File "sqlitesack.py", line 403, in db2class
>   File
> "/var/tmp/python-sqlite-root//usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/sqlite/main.py",
> line 97, in __getattr__
> AttributeError: LOCATION_BASE
>
> Running "yum clean all" seems to work but the error does not go away.
>
> I know less than nothing about python so that doesn't help.  I
> also did a search through the list archives and on Google but couldn't
> come up with anything (OC, I may not have been asking the right
> questions).  The server has a bad optical drive so I can't boot into
> the rescue CD (yet, I've got a replacement coming).  Whenever it gets
> here I'll be updating to 5.1 but in the mean time there's some
> security fixes that have come down the pipe which I can't update to
> due to yum being petulant.
>
> If anyone can shed some light on this or point me in the right
> direction to get this fixed it would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thank you,
> Joe
>

Hello Joe,

I had exactly the same problem. I guess that the problem is the yum
version upgraded. To solve it I searched for an older yum version. I
found this one: yum-2.4.3-4.el4.centos.noarch. And at least it works.

Hope it helps

-- 



Lorenzo Martínez Rodríguez
Consultor de seguridad informática
 

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Natulius CD burner does not accept my 700Mb CD-R disks

2007-12-25 Thread Robert Moskowitz
When I try to burn anything to cd, I get a message to insert a CD large 
enough for my file (normally an ISO image).  Doesn't matter if the iso 
image is a 600Mb Centos ISO or a 48Mb DSL ISO.  Same warning.


My CD-Rs are Memorex 700MB/80min 52x disks that work just fine on XP 
systems.


So what am I missing configuration-wise?


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Where can I find compress and uncompress?

2007-12-25 Thread Daniel Augusto Martins

Dear All

Utilities compress and uncompress seem to have disapeared when I migrate
from CentOS 4 to CentOS 5. Anyone knows where we can find them?

Thanks



Aviso:"O emitente desta 
mensagem é responsável por seu conteúdo e 
endereçamento. Cabe ao destinatário cuidar quanto ao tratamento 
adequado. Sem a devida autorização, a divulgação, a 
reprodução, a distribuição ou qualquer outra 
ação em desconformidade com as normas internas da ELETRONORTE S/A 
são proibidas e passíveis de sanção disciplinar, 
cível e criminal. Esta mensagem pode ser monitorada".
Notice:"The sender of this message is responsible for its content and 
addressing. The receiver shall take proper care of it. Without due 
authorization, the publication, reproduction, distribution or the performance 
of any other action not conforming to ELETRONORTE S/A internal policies and 
procedures is forbidden and liable to disciplinary, civil or criminal 
sanctions. This message can be monitored".


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Where can I find compress and uncompress?

2007-12-25 Thread Johnny Hughes
Daniel Augusto Martins wrote:
> Dear All
> 
> Utilities compress and uncompress seem to have disapeared when I migrate
> from CentOS 4 to CentOS 5. Anyone knows where we can find them?
> 
> Thanks

yum install ncompress





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] yum error "AttributeError: LOCATION_BASE" after 4.5 -> 4.6 upgrade

2007-12-25 Thread Johnny Hughes
Lorenzo Martínez Rodríguez wrote:
> Joe Klemmer escribió:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I am having a problem running yum after doing the 4.6 upgrade.  I
>> did a live update through yum and no problems were encountered. 
>> However, now when I try to run yum (with any commands/options) I get
>> this error right after loading/reading the repo's -
>>
>> eading repository metadata in from local files
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File "/usr/bin/yum", line 29, in ?
>> yummain.main(sys.argv[1:])
>>   File "/usr/share/yum-cli/yummain.py", line 102, in main
>> result, resultmsgs = do()
>>   File "/usr/share/yum-cli/cli.py", line 489, in doCommands
>> ypl = self.returnPkgLists()
>>   File "/usr/share/yum-cli/cli.py", line 1085, in returnPkgLists
>> ypl = self.doPackageLists(pkgnarrow=pkgnarrow)
>>   File "__init__.py", line 993, in doPackageLists
>>   File "packageSack.py", line 148, in searchNevra
>>   File "packageSack.py", line 236, in _computeAggregateListResult
>>   File "sqlitesack.py", line 514, in searchNevra
>>   File "sqlitesack.py", line 403, in db2class
>>   File
>> "/var/tmp/python-sqlite-root//usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/sqlite/main.py",
>> line 97, in __getattr__
>> AttributeError: LOCATION_BASE
>>
>> Running "yum clean all" seems to work but the error does not go away.
>>
>> I know less than nothing about python so that doesn't help.  I
>> also did a search through the list archives and on Google but couldn't
>> come up with anything (OC, I may not have been asking the right
>> questions).  The server has a bad optical drive so I can't boot into
>> the rescue CD (yet, I've got a replacement coming).  Whenever it gets
>> here I'll be updating to 5.1 but in the mean time there's some
>> security fixes that have come down the pipe which I can't update to
>> due to yum being petulant.
>>
>> If anyone can shed some light on this or point me in the right
>> direction to get this fixed it would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Joe
>>
> 
> Hello Joe,
> 
> I had exactly the same problem. I guess that the problem is the yum
> version upgraded. To solve it I searched for an older yum version. I
> found this one: yum-2.4.3-4.el4.centos.noarch. And at least it works.

That is the LATEST yum for centos-4 ... where did you get a NEWER one
that???

Where ever you got it from, that is what broke your system.

> 
> Hope it helps
> 

Hmmm ... not sure what is happening, but this command could help (all
one line):

rpm -q yum yum-metadata-parser sqlite python-sqlite python-urlgrabber
python-elementtree python

The results should be:

yum-2.4.3-4.el4.centos
yum-metadata-parser-1.0-8.el4.centos
sqlite-3.3.6-2
python-sqlite-1.1.7-1.2.1
python-urlgrabber-2.9.8-2
python-elementtree-1.2.6-5.el4.centos
python-2.3.4-14.4.el4_6.1

You can manually download and install any of those that are missing from:

http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/os/

OR

http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/updates/

Thanks,
Johnny Hughes



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Where can I find compress and uncompress?

2007-12-25 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Dec 25, 2007 5:10 AM, Daniel Augusto Martins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear All
>
> Utilities compress and uncompress seem to have disapeared when I migrate
> from CentOS 4 to CentOS 5. Anyone knows where we can find them?

I found the other day gzip and gunzip could work on files created by
compress/uncompress.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


RE: [CentOS] system hibernating?

2007-12-25 Thread Thomas Dukes
Hi Phil,

Hope youi had better luck than I did.  Already had the latest bios
installed.  I disabled the APM and added pci=noacpi to the end of the kernel
line in grub.conf.

Got up this morning and it was the same.

Let me know how it turned out for you.

Thanks,

Thomas

PS  Merry Christmas!!!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Phil Savoie
Sent: Monday, December 24, 2007 3:17 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] system hibernating?

Hi Thomas,

I may have a solution which I found on an Ubuntu list.  Seems that my BIOS
needed upgrading as it wasn't the latest.  This is what the ubuntu list
indicated as to what the underlying problem was.  I just upgraded my bios
just now and will see what happens, i.e., if it slows down again. 

For your info, please start here:

http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=346168

Then go here for the bios update; I used the cdrom image...

http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/site.wss/document.do?sitestyle=lenovo&lndo
cid=MIGR-42952

Regards,

Phil

On December 24, 2007, Thomas Dukes wrote:
> I have a netvista and have not been able to upgrade my kernel since 
> 2.9.9-34.0.2.  I wouldn't call it hibernating, just after a long 
> period of idle time (overnight), it runs really
slw.
>
> Would really love it figure this one out.
>
> TIA
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> Behalf Of Phil Savoie
> Sent: Monday, December 24, 2007 12:22 PM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] system hibernating?
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> This wouldn't be an IBM netvista wouldn't it?  I have the same 
> behaviour on my machines as well.
>
> Phil
>
> On December 24, 2007, Jeffrey Ross wrote:
> > I'm in the process of setting up a new system and I have found that 
> > the system is hibernating when its sitting idle for a long period of 
> > time.
> >
> > How do I stop this?
> >
> > TIA, Jeff
> > ___
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@centos.org
> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Kernel version of Centos 4.6

2007-12-25 Thread Peter Gross
I have been running Centos 4.5 on one of my servers and have a custom 
kernel to handle some hardware issues. Is there a kernel version change 
included in the 4.6 update? If so, what version?


Thanks,
--peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Kernel version of Centos 4.6

2007-12-25 Thread Chris Mauritz

Peter Gross wrote:
I have been running Centos 4.5 on one of my servers and have a custom 
kernel to handle some hardware issues. Is there a kernel version 
change included in the 4.6 update? If so, what version?




All of my 4.6 boxes are reporting kernel-2.6.9-67.0.1.EL.

Best,



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Kernel version of Centos 4.6

2007-12-25 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Dec 25, 2007 7:17 AM, Peter Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been running Centos 4.5 on one of my servers and have a custom
> kernel to handle some hardware issues.

Wonder what hardware issues...

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] problems building appletalk module with new kernel

2007-12-25 Thread Craig White
I've been doing this on CentOS 4 and CentOS 5 but after installing
2.6.18-53.1.4el kernel, I'm having a bit of a struggle...

# make -C /lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/build \
  SUBDIRS=/usr/src/appletalk modules
make: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5-i686'
  CC [M]  /usr/src/appletalk/aarp.o
  CC [M]  /usr/src/appletalk/ddp.o
  CC [M]  /usr/src/appletalk/dev.o
  CC [M]  /usr/src/appletalk/atalk_proc.o
  CC [M]  /usr/src/appletalk/sysctl_net_atalk.o
  LD [M]  /usr/src/appletalk/appletalk.o
  Building modules, stage 2.
  MODPOST
  CC  /usr/src/appletalk/appletalk.mod.o
  LD [M]  /usr/src/appletalk/appletalk.ko
make: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5-i686'

# make -C /lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/build \
  SUBDIRS=/usr/src/appletalk modules_install
make: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5-i686'
  INSTALL /usr/src/appletalk/appletalk.ko
  DEPMOD  2.6.18-53.1.4.el5
make: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5-i686'

and here is my problem...
# insmod /lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/extra/appletalk.ko
insmod: error inserting
'/lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/extra/appletalk.ko': -1 Invalid module
format

The above reflects an adjustment in my Makefile but it didn't seem to
help

why all of a sudden, this 'Invalid module format' ?

Craig

my Makefile that I have been using for quite some time but not the one
used above is...
#
# Makefile for the Linux AppleTalk layer.
#

CONFIG_ATALK=m

obj-$(CONFIG_IPDDP) += ipddp.o
obj-$(CONFIG_COPS) += cops.o
obj-$(CONFIG_LTPC) += ltpc.o


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] problems building appletalk module with new kernel

2007-12-25 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Dec 25, 2007 9:47 AM, Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been doing this on CentOS 4 and CentOS 5 but after installing
> 2.6.18-53.1.4el kernel, I'm having a bit of a struggle...
>
> # make -C /lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/build \
>   SUBDIRS=/usr/src/appletalk modules
> make: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5-i686'
>   CC [M]  /usr/src/appletalk/aarp.o
>   CC [M]  /usr/src/appletalk/ddp.o
>   CC [M]  /usr/src/appletalk/dev.o
>   CC [M]  /usr/src/appletalk/atalk_proc.o
>   CC [M]  /usr/src/appletalk/sysctl_net_atalk.o
>   LD [M]  /usr/src/appletalk/appletalk.o
>   Building modules, stage 2.
>   MODPOST
>   CC  /usr/src/appletalk/appletalk.mod.o
>   LD [M]  /usr/src/appletalk/appletalk.ko
> make: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5-i686'
>
> # make -C /lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/build \
>   SUBDIRS=/usr/src/appletalk modules_install
> make: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5-i686'
>   INSTALL /usr/src/appletalk/appletalk.ko
>   DEPMOD  2.6.18-53.1.4.el5
> make: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5-i686'
>
> and here is my problem...
> # insmod /lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/extra/appletalk.ko
> insmod: error inserting
> '/lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/extra/appletalk.ko': -1 Invalid module
> format
>
> The above reflects an adjustment in my Makefile but it didn't seem to
> help
>
> why all of a sudden, this 'Invalid module format' ?
>
> Craig

I was able to build and install appletalk.ko under 2.6.18-53.1.4.

What do you see with:

/sbin/modinfo /lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/extra/appletalk.ko

Does the vermagic agree with your running kernel?  Also, where did you
get the source for appletalk?  Is that the stuff from net/appletalk in
your kernel's source tree?

Another option may be to follow the wiki:

http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/BuildingKernelModules

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Natulius CD burner does not accept my 700Mb CD-R disks

2007-12-25 Thread Frank Cox
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 07:30:51 -0500
Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> So what am I missing configuration-wise?

Does k3b work?  (You can use k3b on a Gnome system -- I do it all the time.)

-- 
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Kernel version of Centos 4.6

2007-12-25 Thread Peter Gross

Akemi Yagi wrote:

On Dec 25, 2007 7:17 AM, Peter Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I have been running Centos 4.5 on one of my servers and have a custom
kernel to handle some hardware issues.


Wonder what hardware issues...


I had an Nforce mb with onboard NIC that wasn't working at Gigabit speed 
was the primary reason I custom built kernel 2.6.20-1 if I recall.


So I haven't done a yum upgrade yet because I know I had to custom build 
some packages to work with 2.6.20 and I'm afraid those ones will get 
overwritten.


--peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] problems building appletalk module with new kernel

2007-12-25 Thread Craig White
On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 10:20 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Dec 25, 2007 9:47 AM, Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've been doing this on CentOS 4 and CentOS 5 but after installing
> > 2.6.18-53.1.4el kernel, I'm having a bit of a struggle...
> >
> > # make -C /lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/build \
> >   SUBDIRS=/usr/src/appletalk modules
> > make: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5-i686'
> >   CC [M]  /usr/src/appletalk/aarp.o
> >   CC [M]  /usr/src/appletalk/ddp.o
> >   CC [M]  /usr/src/appletalk/dev.o
> >   CC [M]  /usr/src/appletalk/atalk_proc.o
> >   CC [M]  /usr/src/appletalk/sysctl_net_atalk.o
> >   LD [M]  /usr/src/appletalk/appletalk.o
> >   Building modules, stage 2.
> >   MODPOST
> >   CC  /usr/src/appletalk/appletalk.mod.o
> >   LD [M]  /usr/src/appletalk/appletalk.ko
> > make: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5-i686'
> >
> > # make -C /lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/build \
> >   SUBDIRS=/usr/src/appletalk modules_install
> > make: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5-i686'
> >   INSTALL /usr/src/appletalk/appletalk.ko
> >   DEPMOD  2.6.18-53.1.4.el5
> > make: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5-i686'
> >
> > and here is my problem...
> > # insmod /lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/extra/appletalk.ko
> > insmod: error inserting
> > '/lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/extra/appletalk.ko': -1 Invalid module
> > format
> >
> > The above reflects an adjustment in my Makefile but it didn't seem to
> > help
> >
> > why all of a sudden, this 'Invalid module format' ?
> >
> > Craig
> 
> I was able to build and install appletalk.ko under 2.6.18-53.1.4.
> 
> What do you see with:
> 
> /sbin/modinfo /lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/extra/appletalk.ko
> 
> Does the vermagic agree with your running kernel?  Also, where did you
> get the source for appletalk?  Is that the stuff from net/appletalk in
> your kernel's source tree?
> 
> Another option may be to follow the wiki:
> 
> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/BuildingKernelModules

I think I see the problem...it appears that it installed and booted the
xen kernel

Will change and reboot with non-xen kernel

Thanks

Craig

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] problems building appletalk module with new kernel

2007-12-25 Thread Craig White
On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 15:10 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 10:20 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> > On Dec 25, 2007 9:47 AM, Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I've been doing this on CentOS 4 and CentOS 5 but after installing
> > > 2.6.18-53.1.4el kernel, I'm having a bit of a struggle...
> > >
> > > # make -C /lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/build \
> > >   SUBDIRS=/usr/src/appletalk modules
> > > make: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5-i686'
> > >   CC [M]  /usr/src/appletalk/aarp.o
> > >   CC [M]  /usr/src/appletalk/ddp.o
> > >   CC [M]  /usr/src/appletalk/dev.o
> > >   CC [M]  /usr/src/appletalk/atalk_proc.o
> > >   CC [M]  /usr/src/appletalk/sysctl_net_atalk.o
> > >   LD [M]  /usr/src/appletalk/appletalk.o
> > >   Building modules, stage 2.
> > >   MODPOST
> > >   CC  /usr/src/appletalk/appletalk.mod.o
> > >   LD [M]  /usr/src/appletalk/appletalk.ko
> > > make: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5-i686'
> > >
> > > # make -C /lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/build \
> > >   SUBDIRS=/usr/src/appletalk modules_install
> > > make: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5-i686'
> > >   INSTALL /usr/src/appletalk/appletalk.ko
> > >   DEPMOD  2.6.18-53.1.4.el5
> > > make: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5-i686'
> > >
> > > and here is my problem...
> > > # insmod /lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/extra/appletalk.ko
> > > insmod: error inserting
> > > '/lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/extra/appletalk.ko': -1 Invalid module
> > > format
> > >
> > > The above reflects an adjustment in my Makefile but it didn't seem to
> > > help
> > >
> > > why all of a sudden, this 'Invalid module format' ?
> > >
> > > Craig
> > 
> > I was able to build and install appletalk.ko under 2.6.18-53.1.4.
> > 
> > What do you see with:
> > 
> > /sbin/modinfo /lib/modules/2.6.18-53.1.4.el5/extra/appletalk.ko
> > 
> > Does the vermagic agree with your running kernel?  Also, where did you
> > get the source for appletalk?  Is that the stuff from net/appletalk in
> > your kernel's source tree?
> > 
> > Another option may be to follow the wiki:
> > 
> > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/BuildingKernelModules
> 
> I think I see the problem...it appears that it installed and booted the
> xen kernel
> 
> Will change and reboot with non-xen kernel

yup - that was it.

# lsmod|grep appletalk
appletalk  39980  36

OK, I thought I ended xen excursions by removing previous copy of xen
kernel but obviously it came back with updates. How do I make sure that
xen kernel doesn't get installed next time?

Craig

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] problems building appletalk module with new kernel

2007-12-25 Thread Craig White
On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 15:20 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 15:10 -0700, Craig White wrote:

> OK, I thought I ended xen excursions by removing previous copy of xen
> kernel but obviously it came back with updates. How do I make sure that
> xen kernel doesn't get installed next time?
> 

will this do that?

# rpm -e kernel-xen-2.6.18-53.1.4.el5 \
 xen \
 xen-libs \
 libvirt \
 libvirt-python \
 gnome-applet-vm \
 rhn-virtualization-host \
 python-virtinst \
 virt-manager

cuz that's what I did

Craig

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] problems building appletalk module with new kernel

2007-12-25 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Dec 25, 2007 2:20 PM, Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> OK, I thought I ended xen excursions by removing previous copy of xen
> kernel but obviously it came back with updates. How do I make sure that
> xen kernel doesn't get installed next time?

Do a 'rpm -q kernel' and remove all -xen kernels installed.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] problems building appletalk module with new kernel

2007-12-25 Thread Robert



Craig White wrote:

On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 15:20 -0700, Craig White wrote:
  

On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 15:10 -0700, Craig White wrote:



  

OK, I thought I ended xen excursions by removing previous copy of xen
kernel but obviously it came back with updates. How do I make sure that
xen kernel doesn't get installed next time?




will this do that?

# rpm -e kernel-xen-2.6.18-53.1.4.el5 \
 xen \
 xen-libs \
 libvirt \
 libvirt-python \
 gnome-applet-vm \
 rhn-virtualization-host \
 python-virtinst \
 virt-manager

cuz that's what I did

Craig

  
I think /etc/sysconfig/kernel  holds the answer to curing the problem 
"permanently".

Mine sez:
$ cat /etc/sysconfig/kernel
# UPDATEDEFAULT specifies if new-kernel-pkg should make
# new kernels the default
UPDATEDEFAULT=yes

# DEFAULTKERNEL specifies the default kernel package type
DEFAULTKERNEL=kernel
$

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] problems building appletalk module with new kernel

2007-12-25 Thread Craig White
On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 14:39 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Dec 25, 2007 2:20 PM, Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > OK, I thought I ended xen excursions by removing previous copy of xen
> > kernel but obviously it came back with updates. How do I make sure that
> > xen kernel doesn't get installed next time?
> 
> Do a 'rpm -q kernel' and remove all -xen kernels installed.

been there, done that...but that wasn't the answer.

/etc/sysconfig/kernel was the answer

Craig

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] problems building appletalk module with new kernel

2007-12-25 Thread Craig White
On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 17:21 -0600, Robert wrote:
> 
> Craig White wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 15:20 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> >   
> >> On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 15:10 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> >> 
> >
> >   
> >> OK, I thought I ended xen excursions by removing previous copy of xen
> >> kernel but obviously it came back with updates. How do I make sure that
> >> xen kernel doesn't get installed next time?
> >>
> >> 
> > 
> > will this do that?
> >
> > # rpm -e kernel-xen-2.6.18-53.1.4.el5 \
> >  xen \
> >  xen-libs \
> >  libvirt \
> >  libvirt-python \
> >  gnome-applet-vm \
> >  rhn-virtualization-host \
> >  python-virtinst \
> >  virt-manager
> >
> > cuz that's what I did
> >
> > Craig
> >
> >   
> I think /etc/sysconfig/kernel  holds the answer to curing the problem 
> "permanently".
> Mine sez:
> $ cat /etc/sysconfig/kernel
> # UPDATEDEFAULT specifies if new-kernel-pkg should make
> # new kernels the default
> UPDATEDEFAULT=yes
> 
> # DEFAULTKERNEL specifies the default kernel package type
> DEFAULTKERNEL=kernel
> $

thanks...that explains it

Craig

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Natulius CD burner does not accept my 700Mb CD-R disks

2007-12-25 Thread Robert Moskowitz

Frank Cox wrote:

On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 07:30:51 -0500
Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  

So what am I missing configuration-wise?



Does k3b work?  (You can use k3b on a Gnome system -- I do it all the time.)

No it does not.


It prompts me for media, even if I preload the disk before start k3b.
If I 'force' I get a failure and this is the details (I see a message in
the gui error window about using TAO?):

System
---
K3b Version: 0.12.17

KDE Version: 3.5.4-13.el5.centos CentOS
QT Version:  3.3.6
Kernel:  2.6.18-53.1.4.el5
Devices
---
HP CD-Writer+ 8200f 1.0A (/dev/scd0, ) at  [CD-R; CD-RW; CD-ROM] [Error]
[SAO; TAO; RAW; SAO/R96R; RAW/R16; RAW/R96R]

COMPAQ CD-ROM CRN-8241B 2.23 (/dev/hdc, ) at  [CD-ROM] [Error] [None]
Used versions
---
cdrecord: 2.1

cdrecord
---
scsidev: '/dev/scd0'
devname: '/dev/scd0'
scsibus: -2 target: -2 lun: -2
Linux sg driver version: 3.5.27
/usr/bin/cdrecord: Warning: using inofficial libscg transport code
version (schily - Red Hat-scsi-linux-sg.c-1.83-RH '@(#)scsi-linux-sg.c
1.83 04/05/20 Copyright 1997 J. Schilling').
SCSI buffer size: 64512
Cdrecord-Clone 2.01 (cpu-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1995-2004 Jörg
Schilling
Note: This version is an unofficial (modified) version with DVD support
Note: and therefore may have bugs that are not present in the original.
Note: Please send bug reports or support requests to
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla
Note: The author of cdrecord should not be bothered with problems in
this version.
TOC Type: 1 = CD-ROM
Using libscg version 'schily-0.8'.
atapi: 1
Device type: Removable CD-ROM
Version: 0
Response Format: 1
Vendor_info: 'HP  '
Identifikation : 'CD-Writer+ 8200f'
Revision   : '1.0A'
Device seems to be: Generic mmc CD-RW.
Using generic SCSI-3/mmc   CD-R/CD-RW driver (mmc_cdr).
Driver flags   : MMC SWABAUDIO
Supported modes: TAO PACKET SAO SAO/R96R RAW/R16 RAW/R96R
FIFO size  : 4194304 = 4096 KB
/usr/bin/cdrecord: Input/output error. test unit ready: scsi sendcmd: no
error
CDB:  00 00 00 00 00 00
status: 0x2 (CHECK CONDITION)
Sense Bytes: 70 00 02 00 00 00 00 0A 00 00 00 00 3A 00 00 00
Sense Key: 0x2 Not Ready, Segment 0
Sense Code: 0x3A Qual 0x00 (medium not present) Fru 0x0
Sense flags: Blk 0 (not valid)
cmd finished after 0.017s timeout 200s
/usr/bin/cdrecord: No disk / Wrong disk!
Track 01: data   528 MB
Total size:  606 MB (60:05.53) = 270415 sectors
Lout start:  606 MB (60:07/40) = 270415 sectors

cdrecord command:
---
/usr/bin/cdrecord -v gracetime=2 dev=/dev/scd0 speed=4 -dao -eject -data
/root/CentOS-5.1-i386-bin-6of6.iso


=

Note that this is a USB device.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] problems building appletalk module with new kernel

2007-12-25 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Dec 25, 2007 3:44 PM, Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 14:39 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> > On Dec 25, 2007 2:20 PM, Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > OK, I thought I ended xen excursions by removing previous copy of xen
> > > kernel but obviously it came back with updates. How do I make sure that
> > > xen kernel doesn't get installed next time?
> >
> > Do a 'rpm -q kernel' and remove all -xen kernels installed.
> 
> been there, done that...but that wasn't the answer.
>
> /etc/sysconfig/kernel was the answer

I somehow had an impression that you originally installed the standard
kernel and then installed the xen kernel later to "play" with it.
However, from what you said it is now apparent (to me) that you
_originally_ installed the xen kernel.  This is because
/etc/sysconfig/kernel is set up by anaconda at the install time and in
your case it had the "kernel-xen" defined.  In this case, editing
/etc/sysconfig/kernel is indeed required because removing the xen
kernels would not touch that file.  In other words, once set up by
anaconda, /etc/sysconfig/kernel remains the same regardless of what
kernel you install or remove at a later time.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Natulius CD burner does not accept my 700Mb CD-R disks

2007-12-25 Thread Robert Moskowitz

Frank Cox wrote:

On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 17:37:32 -0500
Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

  

Sense Key: 0x2 Not Ready, Segment 0



Get some canned air and blow the dirt off of the sensor in the drive.

No change.

The drive is the coffee mug tray style. so even opening the plastic 
housing for the drive does not let me 'see' the sensor, but I used a lot 
of canned air and no change in behaviour


Perhaps I have to go out to the drug store and buy one of those drive 
lens cleaner disks?



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] problems building appletalk module with new kernel

2007-12-25 Thread Craig White
On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 16:39 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Dec 25, 2007 3:44 PM, Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 14:39 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> > > On Dec 25, 2007 2:20 PM, Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > OK, I thought I ended xen excursions by removing previous copy of xen
> > > > kernel but obviously it came back with updates. How do I make sure that
> > > > xen kernel doesn't get installed next time?
> > >
> > > Do a 'rpm -q kernel' and remove all -xen kernels installed.
> > 
> > been there, done that...but that wasn't the answer.
> >
> > /etc/sysconfig/kernel was the answer
> 
> I somehow had an impression that you originally installed the standard
> kernel and then installed the xen kernel later to "play" with it.
> However, from what you said it is now apparent (to me) that you
> _originally_ installed the xen kernel.  This is because
> /etc/sysconfig/kernel is set up by anaconda at the install time and in
> your case it had the "kernel-xen" defined.  In this case, editing
> /etc/sysconfig/kernel is indeed required because removing the xen
> kernels would not touch that file.  In other words, once set up by
> anaconda, /etc/sysconfig/kernel remains the same regardless of what
> kernel you install or remove at a later time.

This system actually had a clean install of RHEL which still had about 6
months of entitlement left and it probably asked me about installing xen
and I failed to grasp the significance of that question/answer at the
time...I don't even recall seeing it.

I have since migrated the system to CentOS 5. I also have done CentOS 5
installations and noticed that the choice of xen install was fairly
obvious, perhaps I learned to pay attention.

In fact, I didn't even check until you had me do the modinfo and then I
ran uname to double check and it smacked me in the face...xen returned
on me for no apparent reason (but the apparent reason was
obviously /etc/sysconfig/kernel) and I learned something.

Obviously the choice of xen install includes not only
the /etc/sysconfig/kernel setting but also the xen support packages I
previously listed.

Craig

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Natulius CD burner does not accept my 700Mb CD-R disks

2007-12-25 Thread Scott Ehrlich

On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, Robert Moskowitz wrote:


Frank Cox wrote:

On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 17:37:32 -0500
Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Sense Key: 0x2 Not Ready, Segment 0



Get some canned air and blow the dirt off of the sensor in the drive.

No change.

The drive is the coffee mug tray style. so even opening the plastic housing 
for the drive does not let me 'see' the sensor, but I used a lot of canned 
air and no change in behaviour


Perhaps I have to go out to the drug store and buy one of those drive lens 
cleaner disks?




Have you tried removing/reseating the data cable on both ends?   I've seen 
this work a handful of times.  Also, SCSI or other?   If SCSI, is it 
properly terminated, and with the correct ID?  I once replaced a SCSI hard 
drive, and due to some technical change that completely baffled me, using 
the same cable, and ensuring IDs were all correct (unchanged), could not 
get the system to properly boot?  In the end, a colleague with similar 
knowledge ended up relocating the SCSI terminator on the cable itself.  No 
reason why it needed to be relocated, but that solved the problem.


Try cabling and see what happens...

Scott



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Natulius CD burner does not accept my 700Mb CD-R disks

2007-12-25 Thread Robert Moskowitz

Scott Ehrlich wrote:

On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, Robert Moskowitz wrote:


Frank Cox wrote:

On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 17:37:32 -0500
Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Sense Key: 0x2 Not Ready, Segment 0



Get some canned air and blow the dirt off of the sensor in the drive.

No change.

The drive is the coffee mug tray style. so even opening the plastic 
housing for the drive does not let me 'see' the sensor, but I used a 
lot of canned air and no change in behaviour


Perhaps I have to go out to the drug store and buy one of those drive 
lens cleaner disks?




Have you tried removing/reseating the data cable on both ends? 

USB. I thought I mentioned that

I've seen this work a handful of times. Also, SCSI or other? If SCSI, 
is it properly terminated, and with the correct ID? I once replaced a 
SCSI hard drive, and due to some technical change that completely 
baffled me, using the same cable, and ensuring IDs were all correct 
(unchanged), could not get the system to properly boot? In the end, a 
colleague with similar knowledge ended up relocating the SCSI 
terminator on the cable itself. No reason why it needed to be 
relocated, but that solved the problem.

Yeah if those SCSI terminators get a little dirty ;)
Try cabling and see what happens... 


Using 2.0 cables. Of course the server is an old Compaq SFF that only 
supports USB 1.1



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Natulius CD burner does not accept my 700Mb CD-R disks

2007-12-25 Thread Scott Ehrlich

On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, Robert Moskowitz wrote:


Scott Ehrlich wrote:

On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, Robert Moskowitz wrote:


Frank Cox wrote:

On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 17:37:32 -0500
Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Sense Key: 0x2 Not Ready, Segment 0



Get some canned air and blow the dirt off of the sensor in the drive.

No change.

The drive is the coffee mug tray style. so even opening the plastic 
housing for the drive does not let me 'see' the sensor, but I used a lot 
of canned air and no change in behaviour


Perhaps I have to go out to the drug store and buy one of those drive lens 
cleaner disks?




Have you tried removing/reseating the data cable on both ends? 

USB. I thought I mentioned that

I've seen this work a handful of times. Also, SCSI or other? If SCSI, is it 
properly terminated, and with the correct ID? I once replaced a SCSI hard 
drive, and due to some technical change that completely baffled me, using 
the same cable, and ensuring IDs were all correct (unchanged), could not 
get the system to properly boot? In the end, a colleague with similar 
knowledge ended up relocating the SCSI terminator on the cable itself. No 
reason why it needed to be relocated, but that solved the problem.

Yeah if those SCSI terminators get a little dirty ;)
Try cabling and see what happens... 


Using 2.0 cables. Of course the server is an old Compaq SFF that only 
supports USB 1.1


What do the logs say about any possible USB errors?  How about tail -f 
path_to_log_file and unplugged/replugging to see what the active messages 
are?


Scott




___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Natulius CD burner does not accept my 700Mb CD-R disks

2007-12-25 Thread Robert Moskowitz

Scott Ehrlich wrote:

On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, Robert Moskowitz wrote:


Scott Ehrlich wrote:

On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, Robert Moskowitz wrote:


Frank Cox wrote:

On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 17:37:32 -0500
Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Sense Key: 0x2 Not Ready, Segment 0



Get some canned air and blow the dirt off of the sensor in the drive.

No change.

The drive is the coffee mug tray style. so even opening the plastic 
housing for the drive does not let me 'see' the sensor, but I used 
a lot of canned air and no change in behaviour


Perhaps I have to go out to the drug store and buy one of those 
drive lens cleaner disks?




Have you tried removing/reseating the data cable on both ends? 

USB. I thought I mentioned that

I've seen this work a handful of times. Also, SCSI or other? If 
SCSI, is it properly terminated, and with the correct ID? I once 
replaced a SCSI hard drive, and due to some technical change that 
completely baffled me, using the same cable, and ensuring IDs were 
all correct (unchanged), could not get the system to properly boot? 
In the end, a colleague with similar knowledge ended up relocating 
the SCSI terminator on the cable itself. No reason why it needed to 
be relocated, but that solved the problem.

Yeah if those SCSI terminators get a little dirty ;)
Try cabling and see what happens... 


Using 2.0 cables. Of course the server is an old Compaq SFF that only 
supports USB 1.1


What do the logs say about any possible USB errors? How about tail -f 
path_to_log_file and unplugged/replugging to see what the active 
messages are?


Dec 25 20:46:02 onlo kernel: usb 1-2: reset full speed USB device using 
uhci_hcd and address 2
Dec 25 20:46:02 onlo kernel: usb 1-2: reset full speed USB device using 
uhci_hcd and address 2
Dec 25 20:46:03 onlo kernel: sr 0:0:0:0: scsi: Device offlined - not 
ready after error recovery

Dec 25 20:46:03 onlo kernel: sr 0:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to offline device
Dec 25 21:53:01 onlo kernel: sr 0:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to offline device

I terminated k3b at this point and unplugged and plugged in the usb 
cable to the drive:


Dec 25 21:54:07 onlo kernel: usb 1-2: USB disconnect, address 2
Dec 25 21:54:28 onlo kernel: usb 1-2: new full speed USB device using 
uhci_hcd and address 3

Dec 25 21:54:28 onlo kernel: usb 1-2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
Dec 25 21:54:32 onlo kernel: scsi1 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage 
devices

Dec 25 21:54:37 onlo kernel: Vendor: HP Model: CD-Writer+ 8200f Rev: 1.0A
Dec 25 21:54:37 onlo kernel: Type: CD-ROM ANSI SCSI revision: 00
Dec 25 21:54:37 onlo kernel: sr0: scsi3-mmc drive: 32x/32x writer cd/rw 
xa/form2 cdda tray

Dec 25 21:54:37 onlo kernel: sr 1:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg0 type 5


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] OT? Creative Zen player not registering as a USB device

2007-12-25 Thread MHR
I plugged my son's new (Christmas) Zen V player into my CentOS 5.1 box and
it doesn't register as a device that the system can see or mount.

If I lsusb, it shows up as bus 2, device 8, but there is no corresponding
/dev/??? device for it, so the system can't get at it.

(I tried my flash drive in the same USB port and it works fine, so it's not
the hardware.)

How do I get around this?

Thanks.

mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Natulius CD burner does not accept my 700Mb CD-R disks

2007-12-25 Thread Scott Ehrlich

On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, Robert Moskowitz wrote:


Scott Ehrlich wrote:

On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, Robert Moskowitz wrote:


Scott Ehrlich wrote:

On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, Robert Moskowitz wrote:


Frank Cox wrote:

On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 17:37:32 -0500
Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Sense Key: 0x2 Not Ready, Segment 0



Get some canned air and blow the dirt off of the sensor in the drive.

No change.

The drive is the coffee mug tray style. so even opening the plastic 
housing for the drive does not let me 'see' the sensor, but I used a lot 
of canned air and no change in behaviour


Perhaps I have to go out to the drug store and buy one of those drive 
lens cleaner disks?




Have you tried removing/reseating the data cable on both ends? 

USB. I thought I mentioned that

I've seen this work a handful of times. Also, SCSI or other? If SCSI, is 
it properly terminated, and with the correct ID? I once replaced a SCSI 
hard drive, and due to some technical change that completely baffled me, 
using the same cable, and ensuring IDs were all correct (unchanged), 
could not get the system to properly boot? In the end, a colleague with 
similar knowledge ended up relocating the SCSI terminator on the cable 
itself. No reason why it needed to be relocated, but that solved the 
problem.

Yeah if those SCSI terminators get a little dirty ;)
Try cabling and see what happens... 


Using 2.0 cables. Of course the server is an old Compaq SFF that only 
supports USB 1.1


What do the logs say about any possible USB errors? How about tail -f 
path_to_log_file and unplugged/replugging to see what the active messages 
are?


Dec 25 20:46:02 onlo kernel: usb 1-2: reset full speed USB device using 
uhci_hcd and address 2
Dec 25 20:46:02 onlo kernel: usb 1-2: reset full speed USB device using 
uhci_hcd and address 2
Dec 25 20:46:03 onlo kernel: sr 0:0:0:0: scsi: Device offlined - not ready 
after error recovery

Dec 25 20:46:03 onlo kernel: sr 0:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to offline device
Dec 25 21:53:01 onlo kernel: sr 0:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to offline device

I terminated k3b at this point and unplugged and plugged in the usb cable to 
the drive:


Dec 25 21:54:07 onlo kernel: usb 1-2: USB disconnect, address 2
Dec 25 21:54:28 onlo kernel: usb 1-2: new full speed USB device using 
uhci_hcd and address 3

Dec 25 21:54:28 onlo kernel: usb 1-2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
Dec 25 21:54:32 onlo kernel: scsi1 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage 
devices

Dec 25 21:54:37 onlo kernel: Vendor: HP Model: CD-Writer+ 8200f Rev: 1.0A
Dec 25 21:54:37 onlo kernel: Type: CD-ROM ANSI SCSI revision: 00
Dec 25 21:54:37 onlo kernel: sr0: scsi3-mmc drive: 32x/32x writer cd/rw 
xa/form2 cdda tray

Dec 25 21:54:37 onlo kernel: sr 1:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg0 type 5


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



k3b uses cdrecord among other utilities - it is simply a graphical 
front-end.


Have you tried the command-line tools instead?

I have a simple script that collects files, creates an ISO, then burns the 
ISO to disk.  No GUI (k3b) involved.


mkisofs -o /home/scott/files.iso -R -J -T files/
cdrecord -v dev=/dev/cdrom -multi /home/scott/files.iso
eject


What happens if you try the above?   Will it be k3b?  The commands it 
uses?  The hardware?


What happens if you simply insert a writable CD, open it in the window 
manager, drag a file to the disk, and try to burn that file to disk?


Create your own ISO from the above then try to have the window manager 
burn it directly to disk.


Let us know.

Scott
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Natulius CD burner does not accept my 700Mb CD-R disks

2007-12-25 Thread Robert Moskowitz

Scott Ehrlich wrote:

On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, Robert Moskowitz wrote:


Scott Ehrlich wrote:

On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, Robert Moskowitz wrote:


Scott Ehrlich wrote:

On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, Robert Moskowitz wrote:


Frank Cox wrote:

On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 17:37:32 -0500
Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Sense Key: 0x2 Not Ready, Segment 0



Get some canned air and blow the dirt off of the sensor in the 
drive.

No change.

The drive is the coffee mug tray style. so even opening the 
plastic housing for the drive does not let me 'see' the sensor, 
but I used a lot of canned air and no change in behaviour


Perhaps I have to go out to the drug store and buy one of those 
drive lens cleaner disks?




Have you tried removing/reseating the data cable on both ends? 

USB. I thought I mentioned that

I've seen this work a handful of times. Also, SCSI or other? If 
SCSI, is it properly terminated, and with the correct ID? I once 
replaced a SCSI hard drive, and due to some technical change that 
completely baffled me, using the same cable, and ensuring IDs were 
all correct (unchanged), could not get the system to properly 
boot? In the end, a colleague with similar knowledge ended up 
relocating the SCSI terminator on the cable itself. No reason why 
it needed to be relocated, but that solved the problem.

Yeah if those SCSI terminators get a little dirty ;)
Try cabling and see what happens... 


Using 2.0 cables. Of course the server is an old Compaq SFF that 
only supports USB 1.1


What do the logs say about any possible USB errors? How about tail 
-f path_to_log_file and unplugged/replugging to see what the active 
messages are?


Dec 25 20:46:02 onlo kernel: usb 1-2: reset full speed USB device 
using uhci_hcd and address 2
Dec 25 20:46:02 onlo kernel: usb 1-2: reset full speed USB device 
using uhci_hcd and address 2
Dec 25 20:46:03 onlo kernel: sr 0:0:0:0: scsi: Device offlined - not 
ready after error recovery

Dec 25 20:46:03 onlo kernel: sr 0:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to offline device
Dec 25 21:53:01 onlo kernel: sr 0:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to offline device

I terminated k3b at this point and unplugged and plugged in the usb 
cable to the drive:


Dec 25 21:54:07 onlo kernel: usb 1-2: USB disconnect, address 2
Dec 25 21:54:28 onlo kernel: usb 1-2: new full speed USB device using 
uhci_hcd and address 3
Dec 25 21:54:28 onlo kernel: usb 1-2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 
choice
Dec 25 21:54:32 onlo kernel: scsi1 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass 
Storage devices
Dec 25 21:54:37 onlo kernel: Vendor: HP Model: CD-Writer+ 8200f Rev: 
1.0A

Dec 25 21:54:37 onlo kernel: Type: CD-ROM ANSI SCSI revision: 00
Dec 25 21:54:37 onlo kernel: sr0: scsi3-mmc drive: 32x/32x writer 
cd/rw xa/form2 cdda tray
Dec 25 21:54:37 onlo kernel: sr 1:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg0 
type 5



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



k3b uses cdrecord among other utilities - it is simply a graphical 
front-end.


Have you tried the command-line tools instead?

I have a simple script that collects files, creates an ISO, then burns 
the ISO to disk. No GUI (k3b) involved.
I already have LOTS of isos to try and burn. From little 40Mb 
D~mnSmallLinux to any of the 6 Centos isos...


mkisofs -o /home/scott/files.iso -R -J -T files/
cdrecord -v dev=/dev/cdrom -multi /home/scott/files.iso
eject
After I figure out the right device (should be in those /varlog/messages 
above!), I will try this.


What happens if you try the above? Will it be k3b? The commands it 
uses? The hardware?

Stay tune.
What happens if you simply insert a writable CD, open it in the window 
manager, drag a file to the disk, and try to burn that file to disk?
That is what started this. Whether an iso or a file I am told that I 
need a disk large enough for the files. Not what I put in.


Create your own ISO from the above then try to have the window manager 
burn it directly to disk.

Doesn't work.


Let us know. 

Read the start of this thread.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] OT? Creative Zen player not registering as a USB device

2007-12-25 Thread Shawn Everett
On Tuesday 25 December 2007, MHR wrote:
> I plugged my son's new (Christmas) Zen V player into my CentOS 5.1 box
> and it doesn't register as a device that the system can see or mount.
>
> If I lsusb, it shows up as bus 2, device 8, but there is no
> corresponding /dev/??? device for it, so the system can't get at it.
>
> (I tried my flash drive in the same USB port and it works fine, so it's
> not the hardware.)
>
> How do I get around this?
>
> Thanks.
>
> mhr

You might try installing and running gnomad.

I have a fairly old Creative Nomad Zen Extra and it works great when using 
gnomad.

Shawn
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] system hibernating?

2007-12-25 Thread Phil Savoie
Hi Thomas,

Same to you!  Yeah... same for me.  Slow as H-E-double toothpicks.  Damn,

wish I knew what the culprit was.  Works fine with Mandriva and Suse.

Phil

On December 25, 2007, Thomas Dukes wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Hope youi had better luck than I did.  Already had the latest bios
> installed.  I disabled the APM and added pci=noacpi to the end of the
> kernel line in grub.conf.
>
> Got up this morning and it was the same.
>
> Let me know how it turned out for you.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Thomas
>
> PS  Merry Christmas!!!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Phil Savoie
> Sent: Monday, December 24, 2007 3:17 PM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] system hibernating?
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I may have a solution which I found on an Ubuntu list.  Seems that my BIOS
> needed upgrading as it wasn't the latest.  This is what the ubuntu list
> indicated as to what the underlying problem was.  I just upgraded my bios
> just now and will see what happens, i.e., if it slows down again.
>
> For your info, please start here:
>
> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=346168
>
> Then go here for the bios update; I used the cdrom image...
>
> http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/site.wss/document.do?sitestyle=lenovo&lnd
>o cid=MIGR-42952
>
> Regards,
>
> Phil
>
> On December 24, 2007, Thomas Dukes wrote:
> > I have a netvista and have not been able to upgrade my kernel since
> > 2.9.9-34.0.2.  I wouldn't call it hibernating, just after a long
> > period of idle time (overnight), it runs really
>
> slw.
>
> > Would really love it figure this one out.
> >
> > TIA
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of Phil Savoie
> > Sent: Monday, December 24, 2007 12:22 PM
> > To: centos@centos.org
> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] system hibernating?
> >
> > Hi Jeff,
> >
> > This wouldn't be an IBM netvista wouldn't it?  I have the same
> > behaviour on my machines as well.
> >
> > Phil
> >
> > On December 24, 2007, Jeffrey Ross wrote:
> > > I'm in the process of setting up a new system and I have found that
> > > the system is hibernating when its sitting idle for a long period of
> > > time.
> > >
> > > How do I stop this?
> > >
> > > TIA, Jeff
> > > ___
> > > CentOS mailing list
> > > CentOS@centos.org
> > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >
> > ___
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@centos.org
> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >
> > ___
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@centos.org
> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos