Re: [CentOS] Connect to local console from SSH session

2008-02-03 Thread Steven Ringwald


On Feb 3, 2008, at 7:15 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:

I need to see what is happening on the local console to see the  
status of something I left running, is there a way to do this?


The easiest thing that I can think of is using 'screen' or something.  
You have to run screen before you run the application you want to  
"watch", and then with screen -x, you can view/interact with the  
screen...


Steve


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Connect to local console from SSH session

2008-02-03 Thread Joseph L. Casale
I need to see what is happening on the local console to see the status of 
something I left running, is there a way to do this?
Thanks!
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


RE: [CentOS] IPTables GUIs

2008-02-03 Thread Miskell, Craig

> I think there's one for shorewall and firestarter.
Thanks, but firestarter has to run on the actual firewall (thus not
meeting the "multiple firewall/central repository requirement"), and the
only GUI I've been able to locate for shorewall is a webmin plugin,
which implicitly is the same as the above (quite aside from the dubious
security scenario of running webmin on a firewall).

Craig


> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Miskell, Craig
> Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2008 8:43 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: [CentOS] IPTables GUIs
> 
> Hi,
>   This is semi-OT, but is Centos-related.  
> 
>   I'm looking for an IPTables GUI to help us with our expanding
> network configuration.  I know there's plenty out there, but 
> most of them
> seem to manage the firewall on the computer on which they run, or only
> handle one firewall at a time.  I need one that can easily 
> manage multiple
> firewalls from some sort of central location/repository, i.e.
> sharing definitions of services, hosts etc. 
> 
> I've googled and hunted, and FWBuilder seems reasonably good 
> from what I've
> seen so far.  Are there any other packages out there?  Are there any
> recommendations (to look at or to avoid)?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Craig Miskell,
> Technical Support,
> AgResearch Invermay
> 03 489-9279
> "There are no problems that cannot be solved by the judicious 
> use of high
> explosives" 
>   -- British Commando quote, circa WWII. 
> ==
> =
> Attention: The information contained in this message and/or 
> attachments from
> AgResearch Limited is intended only for the persons or 
> entities to which it
> is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
> material. Any
> review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or 
> taking of any
> action in reliance upon, this information by persons or 
> entities other than
> the intended recipients is prohibited by AgResearch Limited. 
> If you have
> received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately.
> ==
> =
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> 
===
Attention: The information contained in this message and/or attachments
from AgResearch Limited is intended only for the persons or entities
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipients is prohibited by AgResearch
Limited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the
sender immediately.
===
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Re: Monitor power save question

2008-02-03 Thread David G. Miller

"nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


David G. Miller wrote:

  

>
> Section "Device"
> Identifier  "Videocard0"
> Driver  "vesa"
> EndSection



[..]

  

> and the video card is (this is a single card that shows up twice in lspci):
>
> 04:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV516 [Radeon
> X1300/X1550 Series] (prog-if 00 [VGA])



any particular reason why your using the vesa driver on what seems to
be a fairly recent ATI card instead of the ATI specific drivers? Perhaps
the vesa driver doesn't work as well with power management(never used it
myself for very long).

I'd try the ATI drivers and see if it fixes the behavior, you'll probably
get much better performance at the same time, with perhaps a bit less
stability depending on what you do.

nate
It's what the install configurator came up with and the ati driver 
doesn't work with this video card (output from startx):


...
(WW) RADEON: No matching Device section for instance (BusID PCI:4:0:1) found
(WW) R128: No matching Device section for instance (BusID PCI:4:0:1) found
(EE) No devices detected.

Fatal server error:
no screens found
XIO:  fatal IO error 104 (Connection reset by peer) on X server ":0.0"
 after 0 requests (0 known processed) with 0 events remaining.

I like getting a new install stable and fully functional with open 
source drivers before introducing perturbations like using a proprietary 
display driver.  That being said, I just installed the ATI proprietary 
driver.  So far the system is stable.  I'll see whether the monitor 
correctly goes to a low power mode tonight.


Cheers,
Dave

--
Politics, n. Strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles.
-- Ambrose Bierce

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] IPTables GUIs

2008-02-03 Thread drew einhorn
check out firewall builder from the atrpms repository or you can build
it from source.

On Feb 3, 2008 6:43 PM, Miskell, Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> This is semi-OT, but is Centos-related.
>
> I'm looking for an IPTables GUI to help us with our expanding
> network configuration.  I know there's plenty out there, but most of
> them seem to manage the firewall on the computer on which they run, or
> only handle one firewall at a time.  I need one that can easily manage
> multiple firewalls from some sort of central location/repository, i.e.
> sharing definitions of services, hosts etc.
>
> I've googled and hunted, and FWBuilder seems reasonably good from what
> I've seen so far.  Are there any other packages out there?  Are there
> any recommendations (to look at or to avoid)?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Craig Miskell,
> Technical Support,
> AgResearch Invermay
> 03 489-9279
> "There are no problems that cannot be solved by the judicious use of
> high explosives"
> -- British Commando quote, circa WWII.
> ===
> Attention: The information contained in this message and/or attachments
> from AgResearch Limited is intended only for the persons or entities
> to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
> taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
> entities other than the intended recipients is prohibited by AgResearch
> Limited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the
> sender immediately.
> ===
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>



-- 
Drew Einhorn
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


RE: [CentOS] IPTables GUIs

2008-02-03 Thread Thomas Dukes
I think there's one for shorewall and firestarter.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Miskell, Craig
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2008 8:43 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] IPTables GUIs

Hi,
This is semi-OT, but is Centos-related.  

I'm looking for an IPTables GUI to help us with our expanding
network configuration.  I know there's plenty out there, but most of them
seem to manage the firewall on the computer on which they run, or only
handle one firewall at a time.  I need one that can easily manage multiple
firewalls from some sort of central location/repository, i.e.
sharing definitions of services, hosts etc. 

I've googled and hunted, and FWBuilder seems reasonably good from what I've
seen so far.  Are there any other packages out there?  Are there any
recommendations (to look at or to avoid)?

Thanks,

Craig Miskell,
Technical Support,
AgResearch Invermay
03 489-9279
"There are no problems that cannot be solved by the judicious use of high
explosives" 
-- British Commando quote, circa WWII. 
===
Attention: The information contained in this message and/or attachments from
AgResearch Limited is intended only for the persons or entities to which it
is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any
action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than
the intended recipients is prohibited by AgResearch Limited. If you have
received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately.
===
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] IPTables GUIs

2008-02-03 Thread Miskell, Craig
Hi,
This is semi-OT, but is Centos-related.  

I'm looking for an IPTables GUI to help us with our expanding
network configuration.  I know there's plenty out there, but most of
them seem to manage the firewall on the computer on which they run, or
only handle one firewall at a time.  I need one that can easily manage
multiple firewalls from some sort of central location/repository, i.e.
sharing definitions of services, hosts etc. 

I've googled and hunted, and FWBuilder seems reasonably good from what
I've seen so far.  Are there any other packages out there?  Are there
any recommendations (to look at or to avoid)?

Thanks,

Craig Miskell,
Technical Support,
AgResearch Invermay
03 489-9279
"There are no problems that cannot be solved by the judicious use of
high explosives" 
-- British Commando quote, circa WWII. 
===
Attention: The information contained in this message and/or attachments
from AgResearch Limited is intended only for the persons or entities
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipients is prohibited by AgResearch
Limited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the
sender immediately.
===
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] cpu type

2008-02-03 Thread Gregory P. Ennis
On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 06:06 -0600, Jimmy Bradley wrote:
>   I have a quick question.
>   The board and CPU that I'm using in one of my machines was given
> to me. I didn't take the time to look up the info on the board or
> anything. I was busy, so I just put the board in a pc case, hooked
> everything up, and loaded the os on the machine. 
>   I didn't know it at the time, but there's a chance it may be a
> 64bit board and cpu. I don't want to pull the machine out of the desk,
> and open it up to find out. Is there a command entered by way of the
> terminal window that will tell me what kind of cpu I have? I want to say
> that it's an AMD sempron 3000+, but I'm not sure. 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Jim
> 

Jim,

Here is a short script that identifies the OS as well as a 64 bit
machine.  The script is not mine, but was posted on this site 6 months
or so ago.

Greg


#!/bin/bash
echo -n "Running "
RES=`uname -a | grep 64`
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
   echo -n "64-bit "
 else
   echo -n "32-bit "
fi
echo -n "operating system on a "
RES=`cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep " lm "`
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
   echo -n "64-bit "
else
   echo -n "32-bit "
fi
echo "machine"

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] cpu type

2008-02-03 Thread MHR
On Feb 3, 2008 10:52 AM, John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jimmy Bradley wrote:
> > flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca
> > cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt
> > 3dnowext 3dnow up pni lahf_lm ts fid vid ttp tm stc
> > bogomips: 1601.05
> >
>
> I believe a 64bit capable x86 has the 'flags' setting "lm" However,
> I'm not sure lahf_lm is the same thing.
>

According to Wikipedia, the Semprons for Socket A, 754, 939 and AM2
were 32-bit, with only the Sempron64 Socket S1 (638) being a 64-bit
CPU.

That's roughly what I recall, also.

mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] cpu type

2008-02-03 Thread John R Pierce

Jimmy Bradley wrote:

flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca
cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt
3dnowext 3dnow up pni lahf_lm ts fid vid ttp tm stc
bogomips: 1601.05
  


I believe a 64bit capable x86 has the 'flags' setting "lm" However, 
I'm not sure lahf_lm is the same thing.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] kiskstart question

2008-02-03 Thread nate
Amos Shapira wrote:

> And how do you get kickstart to start puppet? Do you need to add stuff in
> %post or is it enough to just install the packages?

I don't use puppet, but use cfengine, they perform similar tasks.
I install the packages and base configuration for cfengine in %post
and then when the system boots it sync's up (I still perform manual
hostname and static IP addressing after the system boots, and cfengine
pushes the config to the system based on the host name).

%post
(

cat 

Re: [CentOS] cpu type

2008-02-03 Thread Peter Kjellstrom
On Sunday 03 February 2008, Steve Searle wrote:
...
> Around 12:21pm on Sunday, February 03, 2008 (UK time), Jimmy Bradley 
> I think you are correct.  The appriate line from my 64 bit machine is:  
>
>> model name  : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+
>  ^^

The right answer for the wrong reason. The modelnamn is just an arbitrary 
string. The OPs processor could very well be named as it is and still be 
x86_64 capable.

The right place to look is a bit further down:

>> flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca
>> cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt
>> 3dnowext 3dnow up pni lahf_lm ts fid vid ttp tm stc

This part lists all the features of the CPU and the one that means x86_64 is 
callled "lm" (long-mode). This Semperon CPU should not be able to run an 
x86_64 linux dist.

/Peter


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] cpu type

2008-02-03 Thread William Warren

no you won't really gain anything for regular mundane tasks like that.

Jimmy Bradley wrote:

On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 12:12 +, Steve Searle wrote:

Around 12:06pm on Sunday, February 03, 2008 (UK time), Jimmy Bradley scrawled:


and open it up to find out. Is there a command entered by way of the
terminal window that will tell me what kind of cpu I have? I want to say
that it's an AMD sempron 3000+, but I'm not sure. 

cat /proc/cpuinfo

Steve


Thanks,
Below is my cpu info. I'm thinking it's a 32bit cpu. Correct me if I'm
wrong please.
While I'm on the subject, I have a 64bit board that I haven't installed
in a case yet. Plus I still need to get a cpu for it. My question is,
would I really gain anything right now by going to a 64bit machine? Sure
I know I would if I was doing graphics and multimedia, but I'm just
doing record keeping,plus the other regular computer stuff, finances and
email, and so on.

Jim
processor   : 0
vendor_id   : AuthenticAMD
cpu family  : 15
model   : 44
model name  : Mobile AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 3000+
stepping: 2
cpu MHz : 800.000
cache size  : 128 KB
fdiv_bug: no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug: no
coma_bug: no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level : 1
wp  : yes
flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca
cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt
3dnowext 3dnow up pni lahf_lm ts fid vid ttp tm stc
bogomips: 1601.05


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



--
Registered Microsoft Partner

My "Foundation" verse:
Isa 54:17
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] cpu type

2008-02-03 Thread Steve Searle
Around 12:21pm on Sunday, February 03, 2008 (UK time), Jimmy Bradley scrawled:

> On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 12:12 +, Steve Searle wrote:
> > Around 12:06pm on Sunday, February 03, 2008 (UK time), Jimmy Bradley 
> > scrawled:
> > 
> > > and open it up to find out. Is there a command entered by way of the
> > > terminal window that will tell me what kind of cpu I have? I want to say
> > > that it's an AMD sempron 3000+, but I'm not sure. 

I think you are correct.  The appriate line from my 64 bit machine is:

model name  : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+
 ^^
> While I'm on the subject, I have a 64bit board that I haven't installed
> in a case yet. Plus I still need to get a cpu for it. My question is,
> would I really gain anything right now by going to a 64bit machine? Sure
> I know I would if I was doing graphics and multimedia, but I'm just
> doing record keeping,plus the other regular computer stuff, finances and
> email, and so on.

My _opinion_:  I don't think it is worth it.  I run 32 bit Fedora on my
64 bit workstation, I found there were too many problems for me getting
64 bit version of all the software I wanted (although I believe these
can be overcome with enough effort).  It also seems to me on my machine
there was no noticeable difference between the performance of the 32 and
64 bit versions of the OSes.

On the other hand, if the money isn't that important, you might want to
get a 64bit processor for future proofing.

Steve

-- 

A:  Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q:  Why is top-posting a bad thing?

 12:25:36 up 9 days, 13:50,  1 user,  load average: 0.01, 0.09, 0.09


pgp5VojSQhkWv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] DVD support on CentOS 5.1

2008-02-03 Thread Nicolas Thierry-Mieg




[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hello out there!

 


Been around the block trying to get DVD support for Totem, but I keep
running into dead ends everywhere I go. Looking for CentOS 5.1-compatible
xine and xine-lib packages as that seems to be the answer, but the 
only ones
I find (like on DAG) seem to be just dead links or I get a message 
that the

mirrors are unavailable when I try to run the rpm.


your problems with xine from rpmforge must have been temporary network 
issues, the packages exist and work fine.
xine will give you access to the DVD menus, sometimes this is very 
useful. Otherwise mplayer is great (but it doesn't do menus).

I wouldn't fight to get totem working...
cheers,
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] cpu type

2008-02-03 Thread Jimmy Bradley
On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 12:12 +, Steve Searle wrote:
> Around 12:06pm on Sunday, February 03, 2008 (UK time), Jimmy Bradley scrawled:
> 
> > and open it up to find out. Is there a command entered by way of the
> > terminal window that will tell me what kind of cpu I have? I want to say
> > that it's an AMD sempron 3000+, but I'm not sure. 
> 
> cat /proc/cpuinfo
> 
> Steve
> 
Thanks,
Below is my cpu info. I'm thinking it's a 32bit cpu. Correct me if I'm
wrong please.
While I'm on the subject, I have a 64bit board that I haven't installed
in a case yet. Plus I still need to get a cpu for it. My question is,
would I really gain anything right now by going to a 64bit machine? Sure
I know I would if I was doing graphics and multimedia, but I'm just
doing record keeping,plus the other regular computer stuff, finances and
email, and so on.

Jim
processor   : 0
vendor_id   : AuthenticAMD
cpu family  : 15
model   : 44
model name  : Mobile AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 3000+
stepping: 2
cpu MHz : 800.000
cache size  : 128 KB
fdiv_bug: no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug: no
coma_bug: no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level : 1
wp  : yes
flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca
cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt
3dnowext 3dnow up pni lahf_lm ts fid vid ttp tm stc
bogomips: 1601.05

> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] cpu type

2008-02-03 Thread Steve Searle
Around 12:06pm on Sunday, February 03, 2008 (UK time), Jimmy Bradley scrawled:

> and open it up to find out. Is there a command entered by way of the
> terminal window that will tell me what kind of cpu I have? I want to say
> that it's an AMD sempron 3000+, but I'm not sure. 

cat /proc/cpuinfo

Steve

-- 

A:  Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q:  Why is top-posting a bad thing?

 12:12:10 up 9 days, 13:37,  1 user,  load average: 0.16, 0.10, 0.09


pgpFVFTrgbK0u.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] cpu type

2008-02-03 Thread Jimmy Bradley
  I have a quick question.
  The board and CPU that I'm using in one of my machines was given
to me. I didn't take the time to look up the info on the board or
anything. I was busy, so I just put the board in a pc case, hooked
everything up, and loaded the os on the machine. 
  I didn't know it at the time, but there's a chance it may be a
64bit board and cpu. I don't want to pull the machine out of the desk,
and open it up to find out. Is there a command entered by way of the
terminal window that will tell me what kind of cpu I have? I want to say
that it's an AMD sempron 3000+, but I'm not sure. 

Thanks

Jim

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] kiskstart question

2008-02-03 Thread Amos Shapira
On Feb 3, 2008 12:41 AM, Gary Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Add this to the end of your kickstart file:
> =
> %post
>
> yum -y update
> =
>
> In fact, you can do all sorts of things, like configure services using
> chkconfig. You have a bash interpreter and your chrooted into your new
> install.
>
> I used to do all sorts of crazy stuff in there, until I found puppet :)
> Now I have minimal kickstart configs and I let puppet do all the heavy
> lifting.
>

And how do you get kickstart to start puppet? Do you need to add stuff in
%post or is it enough to just install the packages?

We are investigating doing just that - kickstart a CentOS Xen guest and get
it to pull as much configuration as possible through puppet.

Any other hints anyone can give about using Puppet on CentOS would be
appreciated.

Thanks.

--Amos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] DVD support on CentOS 5.1

2008-02-03 Thread John Bowden
On Friday 01 February 2008 21:08:51 MHR wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2008 2:17 AM, Ross Cavanagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The package that you want to install from rpmforge is:
> > >
> > > gstreamer-ugly-plugins
> > >
> > > It should make gstreamer (and totem on centos5) be able to play dvds.
> > >
> > > I am not sure if it works, as I use mplayer on my personal workstation
> > > :D
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Johnny Hughes
> >
> > Also, you may require libdvd, this is available from the rpmforge repo.
> >
> > -Ross-
>
> Actually, you need several libdvd libraries - libdvdplay, libdvdcss,
> libdvdnav, libdvdread and maybe something else (I still can't get
> Totem to play my DVDs - I use mplayer, too, and xine when it works
> ~40% of the time).
>
> mhr
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Is Kaffeine in the repos? I'm on my Mandriva notebook at the moment,(still 
setting up my first CentOS box). I use it to watch DVD and TV and most other 
media files. It does a check the first time you start it and lets you know 
whats missing.

-- 
Guy Fawkes, the only man to enter the house's of Parliament
with honest intentions, (he was going to blow them up!)
Registered Linux user number 414240
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos