[CentOS] Intstalling a SUNIX SATA2100 PCI SATA Card on CentOS4.6?
Hi all I wanted to expand my motherboard's SATA capabilities, so I got a SUNIX SATA2100 PCI SATA card, which uses INITIO INI1622 chipsit, as per their website: http://www.sunix.com.tw/it/en/Product_Detail.php?class_a_id=0&sid=447 The only drivers available on their website is for Fedora Core 6, and the drivers on the CD supplied is for Redhat 9.0. So, how do I install get this card working on CentOS 4.6, with 2.6.9-67.0.1.EL Kernel?> -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers CEO, SoftDux Web: http://www.SoftDux.com Check out my technical blog, http://blog.softdux.com for Linux or other technical stuff, or visit http://www.WebHostingTalk.co.za for Web Hosting stugg ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Printer drivers
On Thursday 20 March 2008 21:24, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > I see in the repo there are some printer drivers like foomatic and > > hpijs. I'm just wondering if there are plans to also include hplip in > > the future? > > hplip is included in CentOS-5 but not in CentOS-4. Any plans to port to CentOS-4? -- Regards Robert Smile... it increases your face value! Linux User #296285 http://counter.li.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 37, Issue 9
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2008:0154 Important CentOS 4 ia64 kernel - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 2. CESA-2008:0154 Important CentOS 4 s390(x) kernel - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 3. CESA-2008:0196 Moderate CentOS 3 ia64 unzip - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 4. CESA-2008:0181 Critical CentOS 3 ia64 krb5 - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 5. CESA-2008:0180 Critical CentOS 4 ia64 krb5 - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 6. CESA-2008:0181 Critical CentOS 3 s390(x) krb5 - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 7. CESA-2008:0196 Moderate CentOS 3 s390(x) unzip - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 8. CESA-2008:0180 Critical CentOS 4 s390(x) krb5 - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) -- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 03:25:54 +0200 From: Pasi Pirhonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0154 Important CentOS 4 ia64 kernel -security update To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0154 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0154.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/kernel-2.6.9-67.0.7.EL.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/kernel-devel-2.6.9-67.0.7.EL.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/kernel-largesmp-2.6.9-67.0.7.EL.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/kernel-largesmp-devel-2.6.9-67.0.7.EL.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20080321/650dc446/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 2 Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 03:26:46 +0200 From: Pasi Pirhonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0154 Important CentOS 4 s390(x) kernel - security update To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0154 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0154.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/kernel-2.6.9-67.0.7.EL.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/kernel-devel-2.6.9-67.0.7.EL.s390.rpm s390x: updates/s390x/RPMS/kernel-2.6.9-67.0.7.EL.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/kernel-devel-2.6.9-67.0.7.EL.s390x.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20080321/052c5190/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 3 Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 07:43:53 +0200 From: Pasi Pirhonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0196 Moderate CentOS 3 ia64 unzip - security update To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0196 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0196.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/unzip-5.50-36.EL3.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20080321/cda73fb4/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 4 Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 07:44:53 +0200 From: Pasi Pirhonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0181 Critical CentOS 3 ia64 krb5 - security update To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0181 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0
Re: [CentOS] Dag Repos
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: the master mirror seems down (apt.sw.be), but you can use one of the secondary mirrors ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Thanks. I appreciate the help. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Samba Fstab and Automount
/etc/fstab: //machine_name/SAN /mnt/SAN cifs defaults 0 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] SAN]# mount -a Password: mount error 13 = Permission denied Problem is there is no password to the smb server. Why am I getting a password prompt when the share has full RW access and all access is granted on the share? Note, though the share is fully visable and accessable and writeable by just browsing the network. Ok, now next up is automount. The Samba share will not auto mount on client either. - /etc/auto.master /mnt/SAN /etc/auto.SAN -- /etc/auto.SAN machine_name -fstype=cifs,rw ://machine_name/SAN/ --- Anyone see anything wrong with the configuration? I also read the How To on the Wiki and no luck on doing the auto.smb.top and auto.smb.sub configuration? Any ideas what maybe going on? Thanks in advance for any help on this. Also this is posted in the Networking and Harware Forum on the centos.org Forums and No answer. -- ~/john OpenPGP Sig:BA91F079 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] centos 5.1 hibernate - madwifi (ath_pci) not working
Hi, i have problem with madwifi driver (ath_pci) version 0.9.4 ,on CentOs5.1after hibernate wireless devices are not working - i need to restart them (ifconfig down/ up or network restart). Is there any solution? i am using acpid script which will hibernate on power off button pressed. It is just /usr/sbin/pm-hibernate Thanks in advance! D. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Dag Repos
On Fri, 21 Mar 2008, Ed Morrison wrote: Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: the master mirror seems down (apt.sw.be), but you can use one of the secondary mirrors Thanks. I appreciate the help. Also have a look at the new RPMforge website at: http://rpmrepo.org/RPMforge for more information. Kind regards, -- -- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Samba Fstab and Automount
/etc/fstab: //machine_name/SAN /mnt/SAN cifs defaults 0 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] SAN]# mount -a Password: mount error 13 = Permission denied Problem is there is no password to the smb server. Why am I getting a password prompt when the share has full RW access and all access is granted on the share? Note, though the share is fully visable and accessable and writeable by just browsing the network. Try replacing "defaults" with "guest" Ok, now next up is automount. The Samba share will not auto mount on client either. - /etc/auto.master /mnt/SAN /etc/auto.SAN -- /etc/auto.SAN machine_name -fstype=cifs,rw ://machine_name/SAN/ --- Anyone see anything wrong with the configuration? I also read the How To on the Wiki and no luck on doing the auto.smb.top and auto.smb.sub configuration? Any ideas what maybe going on? Thanks in advance for any help on this. Also this is posted in the Networking and Harware Forum on the centos.org Forums and No answer. -- ~/john I suspect you need to pass the guest option to autofs as well. Barry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Samba Fstab and Automount
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 09:30 -0500, Barry Brimer wrote: > > /etc/fstab: > > > > //machine_name/SAN /mnt/SAN cifs defaults 0 0 > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] SAN]# mount -a > > Password: > > mount error 13 = Permission denied > > > > Problem is there is no password to the smb server. Why am I getting a > > password prompt when the share has full RW access and all access is > > granted on the share? Note, though the share is fully visable and > > accessable and writeable by just browsing the network. > > Try replacing "defaults" with "guest" Will not work: mount -a mount error 13 = Permission denied > > > > > > Ok, now next up is automount. The Samba share will not auto mount on > > client either. > > - > > /etc/auto.master > > > > /mnt/SAN /etc/auto.SAN > > -- > > /etc/auto.SAN > > > > machine_name -fstype=cifs,rw ://machine_name/SAN/ > > --- > > Anyone see anything wrong with the configuration? I also read the How To > > on the Wiki and no luck on doing the auto.smb.top and auto.smb.sub > > configuration? Any ideas what maybe going on? Thanks in advance for any > > help on this. > > > > Also this is posted in the Networking and Harware Forum on the > > centos.org Forums and No answer. > > -- > > ~/john > > I suspect you need to pass the guest option to autofs as well. > > Barry [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# tail /var/log/messages Mar 21 10:01:22 ethan automount[30730]: rmdir_path: lstat of /mnt/SAN/.hidden failed. Mar 21 10:01:25 ethan automount[30874]: lookup_read_master: lookup(nisplus): couldn't locat nis+ table auto.master Mar 21 10:01:33 ethan automount[30874]: open_mount: (mount):cannot open mount module cifs (/usr/lib/autofs/mount_cifs.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory) Mar 21 10:10:24 ethan automount[30874]: open_mount: (mount):cannot open mount module cifs (/usr/lib/autofs/mount_cifs.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory) Mar 21 10:12:52 ethan automount[30874]: lookup_read_master: lookup(nisplus): couldn't locat nis+ table auto.master Mar 21 10:12:52 ethan automount[30874]: rmdir_path: lstat of /mnt/SAN/.hidden failed. Mar 21 10:12:55 ethan automount[31106]: lookup_read_master: lookup(nisplus): couldn't locat nis+ table auto.master Mar 21 10:12:57 ethan automount[31106]: lookup_read_master: lookup(nisplus): couldn't locat nis+ table auto.master Bu the way, there is no "module_cifs.so" in /usr/lib/autofs and package autofs does not have it any more?? Why is it looking for it? I suspect that's why AutoMount want mount the file system from the server?? > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- ~/john OpenPGP Sig:BA91F079 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Samba Fstab and Automount
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 7:52 AM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 09:30 -0500, Barry Brimer wrote: > > > Anyone see anything wrong with the configuration? I also read the How To > > > on the Wiki and no luck on doing the auto.smb.top and auto.smb.sub > > > configuration? Any ideas what maybe going on? Thanks in advance for any > > > help on this. Is the wiki howto you are referring to is this? http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/WindowsShares > Mar 21 10:01:33 ethan automount[30874]: open_mount: (mount):cannot open > mount module cifs (/usr/lib/autofs/mount_cifs.so: cannot open shared > object file: No such file or directory) > > Bu the way, there is no "module_cifs.so" in /usr/lib/autofs and package > autofs does not have it any more?? Why is it looking for it? I suspect > that's why AutoMount want mount the file system from the server?? Did you really read the above wiki and follow the instructions precisely as they are written? For example, the error you mentioned here is touched upon in the wiki: "[Note: Upon automounting, you may see an error mount_cifs.so: cannot open shared object file in /var/log/messages. This is harmless and can be safely ignored.]" Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Samba Fstab and Automount
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 08:02 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 7:52 AM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 09:30 -0500, Barry Brimer wrote: > > > > > Anyone see anything wrong with the configuration? I also read the How > > To > > > > on the Wiki and no luck on doing the auto.smb.top and auto.smb.sub > > > > configuration? Any ideas what maybe going on? Thanks in advance for any > > > > help on this. > > Is the wiki howto you are referring to is this? > > http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/WindowsShares Correct > > > Mar 21 10:01:33 ethan automount[30874]: open_mount: (mount):cannot open > > mount module cifs (/usr/lib/autofs/mount_cifs.so: cannot open shared > > object file: No such file or directory) > > > > Bu the way, there is no "module_cifs.so" in /usr/lib/autofs and package > > autofs does not have it any more?? Why is it looking for it? I suspect > > that's why AutoMount want mount the file system from the server?? > > Did you really read the above wiki and follow the instructions > precisely as they are written? For example, the error you mentioned > here is touched upon in the wiki: > > "[Note: Upon automounting, you may see an error mount_cifs.so: cannot > open shared object file in /var/log/messages. This is harmless and can > be safely ignored.]" Yes I read about it, (the error). Any other pointers you can give on it? Auto mount that is. I searched various How Tos on the net and every config I use will not work. Also server and client can be accesed by physical name and ip address. One other thought; would Samba Server producing a "Err can't stat directory as a file" have anything to do with it. Server Version is: samba-3.0.25b-1.el5_1.4 on Server Client Version is: samba-client-3.0.23c-2.el5.2.0.2 on Client Client Autofs is: autofs-5.0.1-0.rc2.55.el5.3 on Client > > Akemi > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- ~/john OpenPGP Sig:BA91F079 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Samba Fstab and Automount
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 09:30 -0500, Barry Brimer wrote: /etc/fstab: //machine_name/SAN /mnt/SAN cifs defaults 0 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] SAN]# mount -a Password: mount error 13 = Permission denied Problem is there is no password to the smb server. Why am I getting a password prompt when the share has full RW access and all access is granted on the share? Note, though the share is fully visable and accessable and writeable by just browsing the network. Try replacing "defaults" with "guest" Will not work: mount -a mount error 13 = Permission denied Any chance that the other machines that are "just browsing" to it and it is working are passing their domain credentials which is validating access to this share? Barry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Samba Fstab and Automount
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 8:19 AM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 08:02 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > Yes I read about it, (the error). Any other pointers you can give on it? > Auto mount that is. I searched various How Tos on the net and every > config I use will not work. Also server and client can be accesed by > physical name and ip address. Just replied to your forum post with my first query. http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&topic_id=13357&forum=39 Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Samba Fstab and Automount
John wrote: On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 08:02 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 7:52 AM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 09:30 -0500, Barry Brimer wrote: > > Anyone see anything wrong with the configuration? I also read the How To > > on the Wiki and no luck on doing the auto.smb.top and auto.smb.sub > > configuration? Any ideas what maybe going on? Thanks in advance for any > > help on this. Is the wiki howto you are referring to is this? http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/WindowsShares Correct Mar 21 10:01:33 ethan automount[30874]: open_mount: (mount):cannot open mount module cifs (/usr/lib/autofs/mount_cifs.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory) Bu the way, there is no "module_cifs.so" in /usr/lib/autofs and package autofs does not have it any more?? Why is it looking for it? I suspect that's why AutoMount want mount the file system from the server?? Did you really read the above wiki and follow the instructions precisely as they are written? For example, the error you mentioned here is touched upon in the wiki: "[Note: Upon automounting, you may see an error mount_cifs.so: cannot open shared object file in /var/log/messages. This is harmless and can be safely ignored.]" Yes I read about it, (the error). Any other pointers you can give on it? Auto mount that is. I searched various How Tos on the net and every config I use will not work. Also server and client can be accesed by physical name and ip address. One other thought; would Samba Server producing a "Err can't stat directory as a file" have anything to do with it. Server Version is: samba-3.0.25b-1.el5_1.4 on Server Client Version is: samba-client-3.0.23c-2.el5.2.0.2 on Client Client Autofs is: autofs-5.0.1-0.rc2.55.el5.3 on Client why are you using Samba, an implementation of the Microsoft Windows native file sharing, on a Unix to Unix connection, instead of the Unix native NFS ? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Samba Fstab and Automount
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 08:45 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: > John wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 08:02 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 7:52 AM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 09:30 -0500, Barry Brimer wrote: > >>> > >>> > > Anyone see anything wrong with the configuration? I also read the > >>> How To > >>> > > on the Wiki and no luck on doing the auto.smb.top and auto.smb.sub > >>> > > configuration? Any ideas what maybe going on? Thanks in advance for > >>> any > >>> > > help on this. > >>> > >> Is the wiki howto you are referring to is this? > >> > >> http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/WindowsShares > >> > > > > Correct > > > >>> Mar 21 10:01:33 ethan automount[30874]: open_mount: (mount):cannot open > >>> mount module cifs (/usr/lib/autofs/mount_cifs.so: cannot open shared > >>> object file: No such file or directory) > >>> > >>> Bu the way, there is no "module_cifs.so" in /usr/lib/autofs and package > >>> autofs does not have it any more?? Why is it looking for it? I suspect > >>> that's why AutoMount want mount the file system from the server?? > >>> > >> Did you really read the above wiki and follow the instructions > >> precisely as they are written? For example, the error you mentioned > >> here is touched upon in the wiki: > >> > >> "[Note: Upon automounting, you may see an error mount_cifs.so: cannot > >> open shared object file in /var/log/messages. This is harmless and can > >> be safely ignored.]" > >> > > > > Yes I read about it, (the error). Any other pointers you can give on it? > > Auto mount that is. I searched various How Tos on the net and every > > config I use will not work. Also server and client can be accesed by > > physical name and ip address. > > > > One other thought; would Samba Server producing a "Err can't stat > > directory as a file" have anything to do with it. > > > > Server Version is: samba-3.0.25b-1.el5_1.4 on Server > > Client Version is: samba-client-3.0.23c-2.el5.2.0.2 on Client > > Client Autofs is: autofs-5.0.1-0.rc2.55.el5.3 on Client > > > > > > > why are you using Samba, an implementation of the Microsoft Windows > native file sharing, on a Unix to Unix connection, instead of the Unix > native NFS ? Because it can be used as the Poor Mans DFS (distribute file system system) direct from the Samba How To Guide and Provide High Clustering Style Availability with out the need for piling on Hearbeat and GFS on top. Allso Scales easy over 1500 Users. And when the said client can't get updates to there Active Directory Domain Controler then Samba is there to pick up the job as DC. Yes, I am aware of bind and ldap also. > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- ~/john OpenPGP Sig:BA91F079 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Samba Fstab and Automount
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 08:43 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 8:19 AM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 08:02 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > > > Yes I read about it, (the error). Any other pointers you can give on it? > > Auto mount that is. I searched various How Tos on the net and every > > config I use will not work. Also server and client can be accesed by > > physical name and ip address. > > Just replied to your forum post with my first query. > > http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&topic_id=13357&forum=39 Replied there... > > Akemi > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- ~/john OpenPGP Sig:BA91F079 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] glibc error ???
On a centos 4.6 box rpm -qa | grep glib glib-1.2.10-15 glibc-2.3.4-2.39 glibc-headers-2.3.4-2.39 glibc-common-2.3.4-2.39 dbus-glib-0.22-12.EL.9 glibc-kernheaders-2.4-9.1.100.EL glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.39 glib2-2.4.7-1 I am getting this type of error at times on a mail server *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0xbffa11b8 *** While I am researching this more, I am wondering if the rpm-qa | grep glib info above showing different version for kernheaders makes a difference in any way. There are lots of search hits out there for this yet I am wondering if I should be focusing on a certain glib area or in the application providing the error in the error logs - rh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] RHEL on The Pirate Bay, Mininova, etc
Hi Centos Users Its _really_ nonsense to release RHEL version on file sharing networks. The only reason why RHEL is so popular on torrent trackers is the lack of knowledge about Centos :-) Conclusion: we should do more marketing :-) cheers Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] glibc error ???
Robert - elists wrote: On a centos 4.6 box rpm -qa | grep glib glib-1.2.10-15 glibc-2.3.4-2.39 glibc-headers-2.3.4-2.39 glibc-common-2.3.4-2.39 dbus-glib-0.22-12.EL.9 glibc-kernheaders-2.4-9.1.100.EL glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.39 glib2-2.4.7-1 I am getting this type of error at times on a mail server *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0xbffa11b8 *** While I am researching this more, I am wondering if the rpm-qa | grep glib info above showing different version for kernheaders makes a difference in any way. There are lots of search hits out there for this yet I am wondering if I should be focusing on a certain glib area or in the application providing the error in the error logs I'd be looking at the application that triggered that error. Apparently, it tried to 'free()' a memory block that wasn't malloc()'d in the first place. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] glibc error ???
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 11:11 -0700, Robert - elists wrote: > *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0xbffa11b8 *** > ... I am wondering if I > should be focusing on a certain glib area or in the application providing > the error in the error logs Application. This error happens when an app does a double free. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] glibc error ???
> > > I'd be looking at the application that triggered that error. > Apparently, it tried to 'free()' a memory block that wasn't malloc()'d > in the first place. > ___ Thank you John and Ignacio and others, So, since this box has been online for like 2 or 3 years, since like centos 4.0 or 4.1 load with multiple yum updates, I am guessing a recompile of that app should make the difference? ;-> Or is that way off base? I really couldn't imagine finding the bad code yet ill try if necessary - rh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] glibc error ???
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 11:27 -0700, Robert - elists wrote: > So, since this box has been online for like 2 or 3 years, since like centos > 4.0 or 4.1 load with multiple yum updates, I am guessing a recompile of that > app should make the difference? No. You need to find out where the memory is being double-freed and remove the appropriate free() call. That or set it to NULL once freed. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Fedora user moving to CentOS
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:38:59 -0800, Tim Alberts wrote: > Greetings, I'm a Fedora user likely going to switch to CentOS in the > next few days. I'm wondering if anyone has some heads up advice for me? > I am very familiar with FC6 and before so I anticipate few problems I > haven't already seen (and know were fixed). I have a testbed machine triple-booting from time to time to F8, C5, and Ubuntu 7.10; after having run RH & clones since 7.1, I still prefer them; but I want something easier to keep up with for my wife to use after she outlives me, as I'm sure she will. One thing I find that you may not is that there are several apps not in the other distros -- mostly betas, to be sure; but I miss them when I don't have them. (She won't.) I do recommend, for that reason, that you start by dual-booting, preferably often, while you get used to the differences. Otherwise, though, yes, CentOS should suit you fine. -- Beartooth Staffwright, Not Quite Clueless Power User C5; D4; F8; P3; U7.10; Alpine 1.0, Pan 0.132; Privoxy 3 Remember I know little (precious little!) of where up is. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Fedora user moving to CentOS
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Tim Alberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings, I'm a Fedora user likely going to switch to CentOS in the
> next few days. I'm wondering if anyone has some heads up advice for
> me? I am very familiar with FC6 and before so I anticipate few problems
> I haven't already seen (and know were fixed).
>
> The main reason for the move is so I don't have to re-install so
> frequently and hopefully not have to deal with so many daily updates. I
> would use the 'upstream vendor' (respectfully), but I work under no IT $
> budget.
>
If you are going to do a 'reinstall' of the systems.. you should have
no problems. If you do a up-grade from Fedora-6 to CentOS there will
be a couple of problems as the packages in 6 kept on moving forward
after the 'fork' in the road. I needed to hand install packages to get
past this so that I didnt end up with 'unsupported' but 'newer' items
on my box. The best method I had was:
rpm -qa --qf='%{NAME}-%{VERSION}\n' | sort > oldrpms
and then compare that with what 5 had in them to look for
conflicts/version changes. Make sure I had plans on how to upgrade
those by hand (I think the kernel and the glibc were the tricky ones
where I needed to do some reboot shuffles to get it cleanly working.)
--
Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RHEL on The Pirate Bay, Mininova, etc
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Simon Jolle sjolle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Centos Users > > Its _really_ nonsense to release RHEL version on file sharing networks. > The only reason why RHEL is so popular on torrent trackers is the lack > of knowledge about Centos :-) > > Conclusion: we should do more marketing :-) > > If somebody's downloading an illegal version of RHEL, you have to ask yourself, do you really think they would've made a big contribution to CentOS if they knew about it? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] simple DNS question - reverse nslookup fails.
vincenzo romero wrote:
Hello all,
I am trying to configure a subdomain DNS server on a Cent OS 5.1 - for
my lab. Brief configuration:
Lab machine ---> 192.168.17.2 (should respond to DNS queries from
hosts in 192.168.16.0/20 network)
1. I would also like to forward any queries outside the above network
to our corporate domain (no firewalls between our 192.168.16.x network
and the corporate network. The domain server is: dns.company.com
with an IP of 10.100.1.2 (255.255.255.0).
2. What I have configured is:
192.168.17.2 --> myhost.lab.company.com
10.100.1.2 --> dns.company.com
3. Installed the dns bind 9 in myhost and set basic configuration via
the system-config-bind GUI. My configuration file specific to my
setup there is:
cat lab.maxiscale.com.db
$TTL 1H
@ SOA myhost.lab.company.com.
root.myhost.lab.company.com. ( 2
3H
1H
1W
1H )
NS myhost.lab.company.com.
qaserver2 A 192.168.17.3
qaserver1 A 192.168.17.1
myhost A 192.168.17.2
=
The rest of the DNS/Bind records were based upon the auto-generated
files from the Bind GUI Config tool.
3. I also changed myhost's resolv.conf to reflect the following:
search lab.mycompany.com
192.168.17.2
search mycompany.com
10.100.1.2
what's this? should be:
search lab.mycompany.com mycompany.com
server 192.168.17.2
server 10.100.1.2
==
PROBLEM:
1. When I am in myhost.com, I can perform:
a. nslookup hostname (to any host within 192.168.x and 10.100.x networks)
b. nslookup ip to anyhost wtihin both networks.
2. When I am in one of the hosts within 192.168.x aside from
myhost.com (for example, qaserver1 or qaserver2):
a: SUCCESS to nslookup hostname to any host within BOTH networks.
b. FAILS to nslookup ip (reverse nslookup) to anyhost within the
10.100.x network.
you did not create the reverse zone. the zone file should contains
something like
$TTL 1H
@ SOA myhost.lab.company.com.
root.myhost.lab.company.com. ( 2
3H
1H
1W
1H )
NS myhost.lab.company.com.
3 IN PTR qaserver2.lab.company.com.
1 IN PTR qaserver2.lab.company.com.
2 IN PTR myhostA.lab.company.com.
WARNING. don't forget the trailing dot (...lab.company.com. with a dot
at the end).
you must tell you bind that it is authoritative for this zone. so in
named.conf, add
zone "17.168.192.IN-ADDR.ARPA" {
type master;
file "192.168.17.db";
};
where 192.168.17.db is the name of the zone file.
A good reference for DNS is
http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS 5.1 - MySQL 5.0.22 - Courier auth lib problem
Hi I am finishing my mail server config and just trying to get the mysql login working - it fails to connect and thorws the following error Mar 21 21:58:21 mail0 authdaemond: failed to connect to mysql server (server=localhost, userid=courier): Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket '/tmp/mysql.sock.' (2) Mar 21 21:58:21 mail0 couriertcpd: LOGIN FAILED, [EMAIL PROTECTED], ip=[:::192.168.10.200] Mar 21 21:58:21 mail0 couriertcpd: authentication error: Input/output error The socket exists # ll /tmp/mysql.sock srwxrwxrwx 1 mysql mysql 0 Mar 21 21:53 /tmp/mysql.sock and mysql seems to be working fine using the same credentials # mysql -S /tmp/mysql.sock -u courier -pxx Welcome to the MySQL monitor. Commands end with ; or \g. Your MySQL connection id is 7 to server version: 5.0.22 Type 'help;' or '\h' for help. Type '\c' to clear the buffer. mysql> some bits from the my.cnf [client] port= 3306 socket= /tmp/mysql.sock [mysqld] port= 3306 datadir= /var/lib/mysql socket= /tmp/mysql.sock any ideas as i am a bit stumped thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.1 - MySQL 5.0.22 - Courier auth lib problem
I am finishing my mail server config and just trying to get the mysql login working - it fails to connect and thorws the following error Mar 21 21:58:21 mail0 authdaemond: failed to connect to mysql server (server=localhost, userid=courier): Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket '/tmp/mysql.sock.' (2) Mar 21 21:58:21 mail0 couriertcpd: LOGIN FAILED, [EMAIL PROTECTED], ip=[:::192.168.10.200] Mar 21 21:58:21 mail0 couriertcpd: authentication error: Input/output error The socket exists # ll /tmp/mysql.sock srwxrwxrwx 1 mysql mysql 0 Mar 21 21:53 /tmp/mysql.sock and mysql seems to be working fine using the same credentials # mysql -S /tmp/mysql.sock -u courier -pxx Welcome to the MySQL monitor. Commands end with ; or \g. Your MySQL connection id is 7 to server version: 5.0.22 Type 'help;' or '\h' for help. Type '\c' to clear the buffer. mysql> some bits from the my.cnf [client] port= 3306 socket= /tmp/mysql.sock [mysqld] port= 3306 datadir= /var/lib/mysql socket= /tmp/mysql.sock any ideas as i am a bit stumped in the end i resolved this by removing the use of sockets from authdaemond and used tcp connections instead ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CUPS gone wrong?
Did something change since (at least) CentOS 5.1, kernel 2.6.18-53.1.4 that would affect the CUPS printing system? I am no longer able to connect to it and that seems to be impacting my ability to use the newest unreleased beta version of SeaMonkey. (My standard release SeaMonkey, 1.1.8, works just fine, but I think that using CUPS is new in the 2.0 beta.) Any constructive input appreciated. mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Browser window problems (previously discussed) - details?
For those of you who have reported here about problems with your browser windows suddenly going away in Firefox and/or SeaMonkey: Please send me all relevant hardware and software configuration details about your Mozilla installation as well as your version of CentOS. I am looking into a theory about why this might be happening and need more input. You can send these privately directly to me rather than the whole list if you prefer. I only need your h/w and s/w configuration information (what versions you are running on what kind of hardware). Thanks. mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RHEL on The Pirate Bay, Mininova, etc
Why would you download an illegal version of RHEL? I see no point in that... On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Michael Semcheski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Simon Jolle sjolle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Hi Centos Users > > > > Its _really_ nonsense to release RHEL version on file sharing networks. > > The only reason why RHEL is so popular on torrent trackers is the lack > > of knowledge about Centos :-) > > > > Conclusion: we should do more marketing :-) > > > > > If somebody's downloading an illegal version of RHEL, you have to ask > yourself, > do you really think they would've made a big contribution to CentOS if > they knew about it? > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Browser window problems (previously discussed) - details?
MHR wrote: For those of you who have reported here about problems with your browser windows suddenly going away in Firefox and/or SeaMonkey: Please send me all relevant hardware and software configuration details about your Mozilla installation as well as your version of CentOS. I am looking into a theory about why this might be happening and need more input. You can send these privately directly to me rather than the whole list if you prefer. I only need your h/w and s/w configuration information (what versions you are running on what kind of hardware). Thanks. mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos I'd be happy to do that -- anything to stop the several-times-daily crashing/vanishing of Firefox and Thunderbird. The former for weeks, the latter only noticed much in the last week or so. But I'm too much of a newbie to be sure what to send you. Can you post a command or two [or?] to generate the text you need? -- stan johnson [All things] are set up through the power of thought. Through the power of conceptuality the world is established. --- the Buddha We see only what we have names for. --- Garrett Hardin http://www.garretthardinsociety.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Bootable RHES CD
I am using Sonic Digital Media Plus v7, on Windows, and I'm trying to make a bootable RHEL IA 64 bit CD (mostly so I can include a kickstart file). So what I did is I grabbed the disk one ISO file, copied the contents on my hard drive in a folder. Then I clicked on the Data -> Data Disk. I then clicked on the "Add Data" button and when the "Select files and folders to add" box popped up, I selected all the files and folders and clicked on "Add". The window showed all the files. I then pressed "Make bootable" and selected the file, boot.img in the Images folder. I then burned all this onto a CD-R. I still can't boot off of this CD. Any hints? I've done this with CentOS, a long time ago, but maybe I'm missing something. === Al ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Bootable RHES CD
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 19:38 -0700, Al Sparks wrote: > I am using Sonic Digital Media Plus v7, on Windows, and I'm trying to > make a bootable RHEL IA 64 bit CD (mostly so I can include a kickstart > file). > > So what I did is I grabbed the disk one ISO file, copied the contents > on my hard drive in a folder. > > Then I clicked on the Data -> Data Disk. I then clicked on the "Add > Data" button and when the "Select files and folders to add" box popped > up, I selected all the files and folders and clicked on "Add". > > The window showed all the files. I then pressed "Make bootable" and > selected the file, boot.img in the Images folder. > > I then burned all this onto a CD-R. > > I still can't boot off of this CD. Any hints? > > I've done this with CentOS, a long time ago, but maybe I'm > missing something. > === Al --- Remember, it is an image file so you have to burn it using special settings. You cannot just add the file in the file list and then burn it. That will just copy the .iso file on the CD. In SONIC DigitalMedia Plus v7 choose "Burn Image" under "Copy" and then browse to the downloaded .iso file and select it. Click on the big red button at the bottom right to burn the image file on the CD. Now it should have a bootable CD. > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- ~/john OpenPGP Sig:BA91F079 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Gnumeric
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Primorec wrote: > > I've checked today here > > > > Extras Testing: > > i386 = http://centos.karan.org/el5/extras/testing/i386/RPMS/ > > x86_64 > > Sources > > > > Could not find gnumeric (yet). > > > > Am I looking into the right repository ? > > > > That is indeed the right place - only, I've been shuffing machines and > drives around setting up some stuff in the DC. So the next push should > have the packages. > The 'gnumeric' problem for the CentOS5.x is solved. There are 2 solutions available. Both of them work. SOLUTION A) (thanks to Michael A.P.) wget http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/5/i386/epel-release-5-2.noarch.rpm wget http://yellowjacketlinux.fileburst.com/yum/yjl/el5/yjl-repo-1-3.el5_1.yjl.0.noarch.rpm rpm -i epel-release-5-2.noarch.rpm rpm -i yjl-repo-1-3.el5_1.yjl.0.noarch.rpm enable yjl-misc in /etc/yum.repos.d/yjl.repo yum install gnumeric SOLUTION B) (found via google on Scientific Linux) http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01563.html repo file: $ cat /etc/yum.repos.d/pjsl.repo [pjsl] name=PJ SL rpms baseurl=http://pj.freefaculty.org/ScientificLinux/5/$basearch/ enabled=1 [pjsl-source] name=PJ SL Linux 5 - $basearch - Source baseurl=http://pj.freefaculty.org/ScientificLinux/5/SRPMS enabled=0 #gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-EPEL #gpgcheck=1 Good luck Igor -- Experience is what you get when you didn't get what you wanted. Randy Pausch ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Browser window problems (previously discussed) - details?
MHR a écrit : For those of you who have reported here about problems with your browser windows suddenly going away in Firefox and/or SeaMonkey: The solution for me was to upgrade to Firefox3beta4. Just doesn't crash anymore. I know there are no updates for now, but heck, from a pragmatic point of view, it just works. Cheers, Niki ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RHEL on The Pirate Bay, Mininova, etc
Mag Gam a écrit : Why would you download an illegal version of RHEL? I see no point in that... Maybe there's also illegal customer support on these filesharing networks :oD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
