Re: [CentOS-docs] Opening of the Wiki - Part I
John wrote: Lets discuss. I'm kinda sure the author or authors, same as me would like there name on it somehow or another. Now this is a whole different story for articles that are no longer maintained by the original author. Just as an equal opertunity that the centos core members would want there name on updated packages. IE The Package Builder. Example: Author writes the article. Authors article gets edited for punctuation by someone other than the original author (s) and then is credited for writing the article. There in my opinion needs someway of keeping the credation of the origional article. Unless it is not maintained by the original author any more. Then put your name somewhere in the article. Moin only handles last changed by which is what you see on the bottom of the page. Problem solved. Cheers, Ralph pgpp8Ow1adbnE.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] modern-CentOS-1.10
Karanbir Singh wrote: Hi Alain, Alain Reguera Delgado wrote: * Update logo. Add comment Community ENTerprise Operating System on it. I am not sure if this means you are attempting to use a new / different logo - we cant do that. The CentOS Logo is pretty much fixed and should stay that way. It's installed on wiki-m.centos.org now. Is that how it is supposed to look? (I'm missing the frame around the content ...) Cheers, Ralph pgp2Dkr2pWj1G.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] modern-CentOS-1.10
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 5:15 AM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Karanbir Singh wrote: Hi Alain, Alain Reguera Delgado wrote: * Update logo. Add comment Community ENTerprise Operating System on it. I am not sure if this means you are attempting to use a new / different logo - we cant do that. The CentOS Logo is pretty much fixed and should stay that way. It's installed on wiki-m.centos.org now. Is that how it is supposed to look? (I'm missing the frame around the content ...) It definitely does not look alright. Blue text on the blue background, etc. Akemi ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] modern-CentOS-1.10
On 5/21/08, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
It's installed on wiki-m.centos.org now. Is that how it is supposed to
look? (I'm missing the frame around the content ...)
And for me the different message styles all come out with a white
background. Did I install something in the wrong place?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] css]# grep lmtxt *
print.css:#dmtxt, #mmtxt, #lmtxt {
screen.css:.lmtxt {
screen.css:.lmtxt.red {
screen.css:.lmtxt.green {
screen.css:.lmtxt.violet {
screen.css:.lmtxt.blue {
screen.css:.lmtxt.orange {
Those all seem to be there ...
Hi Ralph,
Try the following codes into wiki-m and see if you are still getting
the white background:
||class=lmimg blue class=lmtxt blue ( a blue message ||
||class=lmimg orange class=lmtxt orange ( an orange message ||
||class=lmimg green class=lmtxt green ( a green message ||
||class=lmimg violet class=lmtxt violet ( a violet message ||
||class=lmimg red class=lmtxt red ( a red message ||
Cheers,
al.
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] modern-CentOS-1.10
On 5/21/08, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Alain, Alain Reguera Delgado wrote: * Update logo. Add comment Community ENTerprise Operating System on it. I am not sure if this means you are attempting to use a new / different logo - we cant do that. The CentOS Logo is pretty much fixed and should stay that way. Not at all, just following what is in www.centos.org. Do we remove that message on the wiki ? Apart from that, looks good to me. Thanks K.B Cheers, al. ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] modern-CentOS-1.10
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alain Reguera Delgado wrote: On 5/21/08, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ralph Angenendt wrote: It's installed on wiki-m.centos.org now. Is that how it is supposed to look? (I'm missing the frame around the content ...) Try the following codes into wiki-m and see if you are still getting the white background: ||class=lmimg blue class=lmtxt blue ( a blue message || Okay, those work, I must have made a mistake. Does the rest look okay? Ralph Now it looks fine (to me). Akemi ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] modern-CentOS-1.10
On 5/21/08, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... Does the rest look okay? Logo dimentions looks a bit different here compared to the previous one ... maybe that's what Karan noted ... I'll check that tonight. Ralph could we modify the table that is in RecentChanges page top, adding it the messages classes (blue if possible) ? to see how it looks. The print.css file needs a fix on messages. Cheers, al ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] modern-CentOS-1.10
Alain Reguera Delgado wrote: Ralph could we modify the table that is in RecentChanges page top, adding it the messages classes (blue if possible) ? to see how it looks. Hmmm. I have to find out where that one gets generated. Let me look. Cheers, Ralph pgpsNc6unQpDi.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0275 Important CentOS 5 i386 kernel Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0275 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0275.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
e16e0e18187d9d931228c6e11c2d89bf kernel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.i686.rpm
84a3d53a655a9abbaa1bbc9e2a74d007 kernel-debug-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.i686.rpm
54854a7515043387932785d0ca5a5b37 kernel-debug-devel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.i686.rpm
cacfe849df6d086fe0df5ba2548e54d2 kernel-devel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.i686.rpm
bc8dc922d73b61515b0b502b60e5e084 kernel-doc-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.noarch.rpm
52cc1bf88bc8d423151a6841c2705166 kernel-headers-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.i386.rpm
5539c13872ad6708ab0377e85d50e372 kernel-PAE-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.i686.rpm
dae280d46074f4d34a4a2386c04aa972 kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.i686.rpm
4ab36b9e7adf36ca15b337c1bcb4021d kernel-xen-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.i686.rpm
3fcf05e0c22b3a6eaaf13bd73554960a kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.i686.rpm
Source:
6db1dbe7a05d80061bd593bfa16b90ea kernel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0275 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 kernel Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0275 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0275.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
78271de2d69838649627edabf22065a3 kernel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.x86_64.rpm
867eea6bf5aad07eb555ebbdaf1ffbd4 kernel-debug-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.x86_64.rpm
c43110331d753e6a8bdd9d92648fb367
kernel-debug-devel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.x86_64.rpm
42779778f08052c98118eecbb3952880 kernel-devel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.x86_64.rpm
3417b759c192526d881d73af4b12d5d8 kernel-doc-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.noarch.rpm
9b23032f049ad4aecd77a83cd2b328d4 kernel-headers-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.x86_64.rpm
51bdb647b793105738ff423845bcc11f kernel-xen-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.x86_64.rpm
4d8896b2d8495b5f043e298cac809f67 kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
6db1dbe7a05d80061bd593bfa16b90ea kernel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2008:0280 CentOS 5 i386 xen Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2008:0280
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0280.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
fe1476d70e4b6587e5b400aa87d98e33 xen-3.0.3-41.el5_1.6.i386.rpm
d816b1d9bcd821873c2795fc5653a50d xen-devel-3.0.3-41.el5_1.6.i386.rpm
446c29eeb926276cee3958194e888edb xen-libs-3.0.3-41.el5_1.6.i386.rpm
Source:
16062424fe0d1d8f0e60d69c6a1e82ad xen-3.0.3-41.el5_1.6.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2008:0280 CentOS 5 x86_64 xen Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2008:0280
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0280.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
00aac74a24738e20b60422d7f6095c20 xen-3.0.3-41.el5_1.6.x86_64.rpm
550be917a166ef10df70d94347ad4a4c xen-devel-3.0.3-41.el5_1.6.i386.rpm
d11145a16d9781dc33d5368c2e76e317 xen-devel-3.0.3-41.el5_1.6.x86_64.rpm
34a5389dbc59e7feefcd0c1bda13ba79 xen-libs-3.0.3-41.el5_1.6.i386.rpm
f9623d0a717a6d1f7fd3d391432d04d7 xen-libs-3.0.3-41.el5_1.6.x86_64.rpm
Source:
16062424fe0d1d8f0e60d69c6a1e82ad xen-3.0.3-41.el5_1.6.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0287 Important CentOS 3 i386 libxslt - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2008:0287 libxslt security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0287.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/libxslt-1.0.33-6.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/libxslt-devel-1.0.33-6.i386.rpm addons/i386/RPMS/libxslt-python-1.0.33-6.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/libxslt-1.0.33-6.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 i386 installations by running the command: yum update libxslt Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgpiTlA0TWFh1.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0287 Important CentOS 3 x86_64 libxslt - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2008:0287 libxslt security update for CentOS 3 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0287.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/libxslt-1.0.33-6.i386.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/libxslt-1.0.33-6.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/libxslt-devel-1.0.33-6.x86_64.rpm addons/x86_64/RPMS/libxslt-python-1.0.33-6.x86_64.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/libxslt-1.0.33-6.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 x86_64 installations by running the command: yum update libxslt Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgpcXjELb498j.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0287 Important CentOS 5 i386 libxslt Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0287 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0287.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
7e0b80dc175d80179fa5e7391dfc64b9 libxslt-1.1.17-2.el5_1.1.i386.rpm
532c510eedf20c9398ae239d03cb4c0f libxslt-devel-1.1.17-2.el5_1.1.i386.rpm
8366cbd01a41e8d2a75804e2a878894e libxslt-python-1.1.17-2.el5_1.1.i386.rpm
Source:
ef97c07be7897cf9346239cb60557173 libxslt-1.1.17-2.el5_1.1.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0287 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 libxslt Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0287 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0287.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
0e230c50577aed26926e50d594cca5b2 libxslt-1.1.17-2.el5_1.1.i386.rpm
3181699a50ac93f301c4673c0ef7d59d libxslt-1.1.17-2.el5_1.1.x86_64.rpm
047f647bc2cfe8072435c70037a4ed6c libxslt-devel-1.1.17-2.el5_1.1.i386.rpm
a5e1db39df2bb5bcc68fb44054fb6b7f libxslt-devel-1.1.17-2.el5_1.1.x86_64.rpm
6cc5827917f8924c05d88e63a7e34c86 libxslt-python-1.1.17-2.el5_1.1.x86_64.rpm
Source:
ef97c07be7897cf9346239cb60557173 libxslt-1.1.17-2.el5_1.1.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0489 Critical CentOS 5 i386 gnutls Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0489 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0489.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
ce2c33b4d2f56a93bb8f719415fa01df gnutls-1.4.1-3.el5_1.i386.rpm
f98b838a383e9c6a67d4b63a7b73656a gnutls-devel-1.4.1-3.el5_1.i386.rpm
4dca3812b14b2985ecdb161d3893f06a gnutls-utils-1.4.1-3.el5_1.i386.rpm
Source:
a76b54c65c4fc4c11e6b737192f917dd gnutls-1.4.1-3.el5_1.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0489 Critical CentOS 5 x86_64 gnutls Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0489 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0489.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
8be354a03bd46aff3e5d241ab324d938 gnutls-1.4.1-3.el5_1.i386.rpm
f3af92775c43b76596fdb0f5d4996118 gnutls-1.4.1-3.el5_1.x86_64.rpm
fdab386ba25f06064d348ccb08aab3ef gnutls-devel-1.4.1-3.el5_1.i386.rpm
fdce43cd5b8c346574dbe47954e27395 gnutls-devel-1.4.1-3.el5_1.x86_64.rpm
01d98b6c8d1a3fa157d180fed0cdd040 gnutls-utils-1.4.1-3.el5_1.x86_64.rpm
Source:
a76b54c65c4fc4c11e6b737192f917dd gnutls-1.4.1-3.el5_1.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-virt] About dom0 and guest machine
Hello Friends, good afternoon I'd like to ask about stored settings of dom0 and guests machine. For example, I've a SunFire x4600 with 32GB/Ram and 16 CPU's (8 CPU's dual core). When I power on my system, with the command #xm vcpu-list, I can see this [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# xm vcpu-list Name ID VCPUs CPU State Time(s) CPU Affinity Domain-0 0 0 0 -b- 23.1 any cpu Domain-0 0 1 7 -b- 12.7 any cpu Domain-0 0 210 r-- 15.2 any cpu Domain-0 0 3 9 -b- 10.8 any cpu Domain-0 0 4 2 -b- 11.4 any cpu Domain-0 0 5 8 -b- 10.6 any cpu Domain-0 0 612 -b- 10.6 any cpu Domain-0 0 7 4 -b- 10.5 any cpu Domain-0 0 8 5 -b- 9.7 any cpu Domain-0 0 9 0 -b- 8.9 any cpu Domain-0 01014 -b- 8.8 any cpu Domain-0 01115 -b- 8.6 any cpu Domain-0 01213 -b- 8.9 any cpu Domain-0 013 0 -b- 8.9 any cpu Domain-0 01411 -b- 10.4 any cpu Domain-0 015 3 -b- 12.3 any cpu Ok, but if I enter with this command (#xm vcpu-set 0 5) and restart the machine, my system return with 5 actives CPU's PS: My /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp is configured like above (referent a CPU to dom0): (dom0-cpus 0) So, this is my first doubt. What do you recommend like a good configuration, keep to (dom0-cpus 0) or force the max CPU to cpu0, in my case (dom0-cpus 16) ? My second doubt is about the guest machine, when I make a config file, I can set the vcpus flag, where I can set the MAX CPU number (I believe), so, Imagine, I'd like to create a guest machine with 4 CPU's, but, maybe, I need increase this value. How do you recommend the configuration of vcpus field in guest machine config file ?!, with the max CPU possible or there are another configuration for this. So, Thank you in advanced. Best Regards -- __ Atenciosamente Waldirio msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Site: www.waldirio.com.br Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br PGP: www.waldirio.com.br/public.html ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-es] Ayuda!!! yum no instala nada!!!
El Mié 21 May 2008, Alberto Castillo escribió: Hola a todos! esta es la 1era vez q escribo a esta lista. Necesito ayuda con un tema que me tiene totalmente desconcertado: yum actualiza las cabeceras pero no instala nada! el CentOs q uso es el k12 5EL (centos 5) Yo me encuentro detras de un proxy, pero ya he configurado el proxy correctamente, tanto yum.con, como yumex.conf y /etc/profile con 'export'. El tema es que lee las cabeceras 'base', 'extras'... todo ok, excepto 'contrib', pero cuando quiero instalar o actualizar algo, por ejemplo 'firefox' me tira el siguiente error: yumex: Preparando para instalar/eliminar/actualizar -- Preparándose para instalar -- Preparándose para eliminar -- Preparándose para una actialización parcial -- Poblando la transacción con los paquetes seleccionados. Espere. --- Descargando cabeceras para que firefox las empaquete en la transacción Failure getting http://centos.pop.com.br/5.1/updates/i386/RPMS/firefox-1.5.0.12-15.el5.cent os.i386.rpm: -- [b][Errno 14] HTTP Error 403: Forbidden[/b] Estimado, ¿Puedes hacer a ese rpm desde algun navegador? Creo que deberás revisar tu proxy Y7o la configuración de yum nuevamente. -- Renato Covarrubias Romero - counter.li.org #399677 rcovarru [at] alumnos.inf.utfsm.cl http://rnt.bla.cl Estudiante Ingenieria Civil Informatica, Casa Central, UTFSM. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Ayuda!!! yum no instala nada!!!
El Mié 21 May 2008, Renato Covarrubias Romero escribió: El Mié 21 May 2008, Alberto Castillo escribió: Hola a todos! esta es la 1era vez q escribo a esta lista. Necesito ayuda con un tema que me tiene totalmente desconcertado: yum actualiza las cabeceras pero no instala nada! el CentOs q uso es el k12 5EL (centos 5) Yo me encuentro detras de un proxy, pero ya he configurado el proxy correctamente, tanto yum.con, como yumex.conf y /etc/profile con 'export'. El tema es que lee las cabeceras 'base', 'extras'... todo ok, excepto 'contrib', pero cuando quiero instalar o actualizar algo, por ejemplo 'firefox' me tira el siguiente error: yumex: Preparando para instalar/eliminar/actualizar -- Preparándose para instalar -- Preparándose para eliminar -- Preparándose para una actialización parcial -- Poblando la transacción con los paquetes seleccionados. Espere. --- Descargando cabeceras para que firefox las empaquete en la transacción Failure getting http://centos.pop.com.br/5.1/updates/i386/RPMS/firefox-1.5.0.12-15.el5.ce nt os.i386.rpm: -- [b][Errno 14] HTTP Error 403: Forbidden[/b] Estimado, ¿Puedes hacer a ese rpm desde algun navegador? s,hacer a,descargar, Creo que deberás revisar tu proxy Y7o la configuración de yum nuevamente. s,7,/, Puedes ser que el proxy te esté denegando el descargar esos RPM's. Saludos! PD: Mala combinación de teclas, y el correo se envió antes de lo deseado. -- Renato Covarrubias Romero - counter.li.org #399677 rcovarru [at] alumnos.inf.utfsm.cl http://rnt.bla.cl Estudiante Ingenieria Civil Informatica, Casa Central, UTFSM. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Ayuda!!! yum no instala nada!!!
Gracias muchachos! mañana les comento! 2008/5/21 Renato Covarrubias Romero [EMAIL PROTECTED]: El Mié 21 May 2008, Renato Covarrubias Romero escribió: El Mié 21 May 2008, Alberto Castillo escribió: Hola a todos! esta es la 1era vez q escribo a esta lista. Necesito ayuda con un tema que me tiene totalmente desconcertado: yum actualiza las cabeceras pero no instala nada! el CentOs q uso es el k12 5EL (centos 5) Yo me encuentro detras de un proxy, pero ya he configurado el proxy correctamente, tanto yum.con, como yumex.conf y /etc/profile con 'export'. El tema es que lee las cabeceras 'base', 'extras'... todo ok, excepto 'contrib', pero cuando quiero instalar o actualizar algo, por ejemplo 'firefox' me tira el siguiente error: yumex: Preparando para instalar/eliminar/actualizar -- Preparándose para instalar -- Preparándose para eliminar -- Preparándose para una actialización parcial -- Poblando la transacción con los paquetes seleccionados. Espere. --- Descargando cabeceras para que firefox las empaquete en la transacción Failure getting http://centos.pop.com.br/5.1/updates/i386/RPMS/firefox-1.5.0.12-15.el5.ce nt os.i386.rpm: -- [b][Errno 14] HTTP Error 403: Forbidden[/b] Estimado, ¿Puedes hacer a ese rpm desde algun navegador? s,hacer a,descargar, Creo que deberás revisar tu proxy Y7o la configuración de yum nuevamente. s,7,/, Puedes ser que el proxy te esté denegando el descargar esos RPM's. Saludos! PD: Mala combinación de teclas, y el correo se envió antes de lo deseado. -- Renato Covarrubias Romero - counter.li.org #399677 rcovarru [at] alumnos.inf.utfsm.cl http://rnt.bla.cl Estudiante Ingenieria Civil Informatica, Casa Central, UTFSM. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Ayuda!!! yum no instala nada!!!
Buenas noches, Seguro que el cortafuegos, proxy...o lo que sea que gestione la navegación te está fastidiando...eso me suecede a mi en una máquina virtual en mi trabajo y es porque no he abierto el acceso en el stonegate :) 2008/5/21 Alberto Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Gracias muchachos! mañana les comento! 2008/5/21 Renato Covarrubias Romero [EMAIL PROTECTED]: El Mié 21 May 2008, Renato Covarrubias Romero escribió: El Mié 21 May 2008, Alberto Castillo escribió: Hola a todos! esta es la 1era vez q escribo a esta lista. Necesito ayuda con un tema que me tiene totalmente desconcertado: yum actualiza las cabeceras pero no instala nada! el CentOs q uso es el k12 5EL (centos 5) Yo me encuentro detras de un proxy, pero ya he configurado el proxy correctamente, tanto yum.con, como yumex.conf y /etc/profile con 'export'. El tema es que lee las cabeceras 'base', 'extras'... todo ok, excepto 'contrib', pero cuando quiero instalar o actualizar algo, por ejemplo 'firefox' me tira el siguiente error: yumex: Preparando para instalar/eliminar/actualizar -- Preparándose para instalar -- Preparándose para eliminar -- Preparándose para una actialización parcial -- Poblando la transacción con los paquetes seleccionados. Espere. --- Descargando cabeceras para que firefox las empaquete en la transacción Failure getting http://centos.pop.com.br/5.1/updates/i386/RPMS/firefox-1.5.0.12-15.el5.ce nt os.i386.rpm: -- [b][Errno 14] HTTP Error 403: Forbidden[/b] Estimado, ¿Puedes hacer a ese rpm desde algun navegador? s,hacer a,descargar, Creo que deberás revisar tu proxy Y7o la configuración de yum nuevamente. s,7,/, Puedes ser que el proxy te esté denegando el descargar esos RPM's. Saludos! PD: Mala combinación de teclas, y el correo se envió antes de lo deseado. -- Renato Covarrubias Romero - counter.li.org #399677 rcovarru [at] alumnos.inf.utfsm.cl http://rnt.bla.cl Estudiante Ingenieria Civil Informatica, Casa Central, UTFSM. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Saludos, Oscar Osta Pueyo [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] 1333/8GB Intel motherboard for C5.1
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 3:59 AM, Nicholas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Seems like it is the way Intel chips are designed. One solution would be to ensure that 64bit is used. However, due to cost I am sure many would have gone for the 32bit machines with AHCI mode. Well, 64bit is the solution to address over-4GB memory. But since now, whenever I decided to upgrade a intel chipset mobo over 4GB, performance has significantly decreased. This is the BUG with latest chipsets and bios; not 32bit/64bit addressing issue. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: OT: Top Posting
Sorry to jump in here, but combination of humorous and serious thoughts crossed my mind. And maybe these thoughts will allay future threads of this nature. On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 09:28 -0500, Doug Tucker wrote: (Me, too, of course!) mhr MHR, This is true, and you and I proved we can even have fun with it, but name calling (I got called an ass here for virtually nothing), and But keep in mind you were only a virtual ass. Not really one. And the person who labeled you as an ass may have been, in fact, the ass. Regardless, his was only a virtual opinion. And unless you have a personal relationship and really care what he felt... Often, when one of the habitual denizens of the list snipe at you, they only make themselves look bad. Old farts like me think Their momma didn't raise them right. Or they had a rough night. And I'm glad they have the isolation of the 'net to allow them to vent in safety. Being an old fart, I see lots of behavior that would not have occurred when things had to be said face-to-face. Courage without risk is common, in both senses of the word. Bravado? Consideration and courtesy without reward is rare. disrespectful snide remarks (such as telling someone they have provided zero value to a conversation when it was valuable to them), are not being blunt, that's simply being rude and childish, and has no place even amongst us nerds. Ignore them. They make themselves look bad. snip sig stuff -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 1333/8GB Intel motherboard for C5.1
Realtek drivers can be found in the CentOS wiki: http://wiki.centos.org/HardwareList#head-851e245f4f537add3de9c3c6a6d686771fb01bfa Sweet thanks. Now I know about dkms-enabled driver package which rebuilds the driver automatically for each kernel upgrade! Shawn ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange NTP problem
On May 21, 2008, at 0:55, Paul Heinlein wrote: Yeah, with an offset of 54 seconds, it's a bad system. :-) Try this (assuming 10.101.32.104 is your preferred local NTP server): service ntpd stop echo 10.101.32.104 /etc/ntp/step-tickers service ntpd start Adding a server to the step-tickers file will tell the ntpd init script to do an ntpdate sync against that host before starting ntpd. In effect, that's what I did manually. When I found out that about this problem, I did the following: # service ntpd stop # ntpdate ntp # service ntpd start (ntp is a CNAME record for our local NTP server). But after 24 hours, the system was off my more than 5 minutes. Why would it not bind to the NTP server. Here is some output from tshark while ntpd was running: # tshark udp port 123 Running as user root and group root. This could be dangerous. Capturing on eth0 0.00 10.66.42.109 - 10.101.32.104 NTP NTP client 0.000683 10.101.32.104 - 10.66.42.109 NTP NTP server 1025.000547 10.66.42.109 - 10.101.32.104 NTP NTP client 1025.002017 10.101.32.104 - 10.66.42.109 NTP NTP server 2050.000145 10.66.42.109 - 10.101.32.104 NTP NTP client 2050.000812 10.101.32.104 - 10.66.42.109 NTP NTP server 3076.000485 10.66.42.109 - 10.101.32.104 NTP NTP client 3076.001917 10.101.32.104 - 10.66.42.109 NTP NTP server 4101.001065 10.66.42.109 - 10.101.32.104 NTP NTP client 4101.002016 10.101.32.104 - 10.66.42.109 NTP NTP server 5126.000671 10.66.42.109 - 10.101.32.104 NTP NTP client 5126.001551 10.101.32.104 - 10.66.42.109 NTP NTP server 6151.001270 10.66.42.109 - 10.101.32.104 NTP NTP client 6151.001868 10.101.32.104 - 10.66.42.109 NTP NTP server 7175.999866 10.66.42.109 - 10.101.32.104 NTP NTP client 7176.000482 10.101.32.104 - 10.66.42.109 NTP NTP server 8201.999206 10.66.42.109 - 10.101.32.104 NTP NTP client 8202.000563 10.101.32.104 - 10.66.42.109 NTP NTP server 9227.000796 10.66.42.109 - 10.101.32.104 NTP NTP client 9227.001462 10.101.32.104 - 10.66.42.109 NTP NTP server Does this make any sense? Alfred ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Maybe OT: Some strange problem with postfix
carlopmart wrote: Hi all, I have a strange problem with postfix on a CentOS 5.1 (fully patched). Every time that postfix sends a message to public smtp servers generates an autoresponse mail to sender about delay ... Somebody knows how can I fix this?? Show logs. Ralph pgpGG7hW9OyaY.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Maybe OT: Some strange problem with postfix
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
carlopmart wrote:
Hi all,
I have a strange problem with postfix on a CentOS 5.1 (fully patched). Every
time that postfix sends a message to public smtp servers generates an
autoresponse mail to sender about delay ...
Somebody knows how can I fix this??
Show logs.
Ralph
It doesn't appears any error on maillog about this. Only postfix sends a message
to sender's that informs his message will be delivered ...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
--
CL Martinez
carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Maybe OT: Some strange problem with postfix
carlopmart wrote: Ralph Angenendt wrote: carlopmart wrote: I have a strange problem with postfix on a CentOS 5.1 (fully patched). Every time that postfix sends a message to public smtp servers generates an autoresponse mail to sender about delay ... Somebody knows how can I fix this?? Show logs. It doesn't appears any error on maillog about this. Only postfix sends a message to sender's that informs his message will be delivered ... Are you sure that it is postfix sending that message? This should be visible from the *logs* Also show postconf -n Ralph pgpYsZe1LI6WN.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0275 Important CentOS 5 i386 kernel Update
Karanbir Singh wrote: CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0275 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0275.html This update seems to break IPsec in the kernel, see http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2853. Cheers, Ralph pgpyes8rwXyrf.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: OT: Top Posting
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 05:41 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote: Sorry to jump in here, but combination of humorous and serious thoughts crossed my mind. And maybe these thoughts will allay future threads of this nature. On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 09:28 -0500, Doug Tucker wrote: (Me, too, of course!) mhr MHR, This is true, and you and I proved we can even have fun with it, but name calling (I got called an ass here for virtually nothing), and But keep in mind you were only a virtual ass. Not really one. And the person who labeled you as an ass may have been, in fact, the ass. Regardless, his was only a virtual opinion. And unless you have a personal relationship and really care what he felt... Often, when one of the habitual denizens of the list snipe at you, they only make themselves look bad. Old farts like me think Their momma didn't raise them right. Or they had a rough night. And I'm glad they have the isolation of the 'net to allow them to vent in safety. Being an old fart, I see lots of behavior that would not have occurred when things had to be said face-to-face. Courage without risk is common, in both senses of the word. Bravado? Consideration and courtesy without reward is rare. disrespectful snide remarks (such as telling someone they have provided zero value to a conversation when it was valuable to them), are not being blunt, that's simply being rude and childish, and has no place even amongst us nerds. Ignore them. They make themselves look bad. snip sig stuff Hahahahathat was good, and a lot of truth in it too. And I didn't snipe back, I ignored it for the most part, but being an old fart myself, and a born and raised Texas boy, when they started sniping at a lady, well, where I come from IRL, that would buy them a good of fashioned country butt whoopin. I was polite, but frankly thought they needed a virtual slap down. I did resist the temptation :). Reminded me too of a video my 4 year old watches, where the old cow tells his son A strong man stands up for himself, a stronger man stands up for others. And yes, courage without risk is common. Being an old Texas boy, I would love the opportunity to discuss IRL :). ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] XFS + LVM
Hi, I see old post on the web discouraging the use of XFS on top of LVM, mostly seems to be driver problems .. in any case it was not reassuring. I was wondering, with current drivers and kernels (CentOS5), if they are any issue doing so. I have no real need for LVM, I am just use to it and occasionally found it useful. It is my first time building a 12T partition and for my usage I think XFS seems to be the way to go. It will mostly be use for uncompress audio storage. Any comments will be more than welcome, cheers, alain ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] XFS + LVM
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Alain Terriault, Mr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any comments will be more than welcome, The biggest issue with XFS has been the 4kstack limitation on the x86 kernel. If you're using x86_64, you should have no real problem with xfs on top of LVM, because the x86_64 kernel uses 8K stacks instead. Also, keep in mind that grub in centos doesn't play well with partitions larger than 2TB, so the ideal solution would be to keep the OS on ext3, and create a /data/ xfs partition area with your 12TB of audio. -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Maybe OT: Some strange problem with postfix
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
carlopmart wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
carlopmart wrote:
I have a strange problem with postfix on a CentOS 5.1 (fully patched). Every
time that postfix sends a message to public smtp servers generates an
autoresponse mail to sender about delay ...
Somebody knows how can I fix this??
Show logs.
It doesn't appears any error on maillog about this. Only postfix sends a
message to sender's that informs his message will be delivered ...
Are you sure that it is postfix sending that message? This should be
visible from the *logs*
Also show postconf -n
Ralph
Ralph, yes I am sure. I can't find any entry in log file about this problem. All
mails appears as delivered. Postfix sends this message:
Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/16/08 1:23
This is the mail system at host mail.domain.com.
Your message was successfully delivered to the destination(s)
listed below. If the message was delivered to mailbox you will
receive no further notifications. Otherwise you may still receive
notifications of mail delivery errors from other systems.
The mail system
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: delivery via localhost[127.0.0.1]:10025: 250 2.0.0 Ok:
queued as D61DDEC962
My postconf:
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
content_filter = imss:localhost:10025
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
default_process_limit = 200
disable_vrfy_command = yes
header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks
invalid_hostname_reject_code = 554
local_recipient_maps = $alias_maps, ldap:ldapsource
mail_owner = postfix
mailbox_command =
mailbox_size_limit = 0
mailq_path = /usr/bin/mailq.postfix
message_size_limit = 12582912
multi_recipient_bounce_reject_code = 554
mydestination = $myhostname, $myorigin, localhost.localdomain, localhost,
$transport_maps
mydomain = domain.com
myhostname = mail.domain.com
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, 192.168.1.4/32, 192.168.5.1/32
myorigin = $mydomain
newaliases_path = /usr/bin/newaliases.postfix
non_fqdn_reject_code = 554
queue_directory = /var/spool/postfix
recipient_delimiter = +
relay_domains = $mydestination
relay_domains_reject_code = 554
sendmail_path = /usr/sbin/sendmail.postfix
setgid_group = postdrop
smtpd_banner = Primary ESMTP v3.0
smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, check_client_access
hash:/etc/postfix/access, reject_invalid_hostname, reject_non_fqdn_hostname,
reject_non_fqdn_sender, reject_unknown_sender_domain
smtpd_data_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_unauth_pipelining
smtpd_helo_required = yes
smtpd_helo_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_invalid_hostname,
reject_non_fqdn_hostname
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_invalid_hostname,
reject_non_fqdn_hostname, reject_non_fqdn_sender, reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
reject_unknown_sender_domain, reject_unknown_recipient_domain, reject_rbl_client
multi.uribl.com, reject_rbl_client dsn.rfc-ignorant.org,
reject_rbl_client dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net, reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org, reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
reject_rbl_client dnsbl.sorbs.net, reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org,
reject_rbl_client ix.dnsbl.manitu.net, reject_rbl_client combined.rbl.msrbl.net,
reject_rbl_client rabl.nuclearelephant.com, reject_rbl_client
pbl.spamhaus.org, reject_unauth_destination
smtpd_sender_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_unknown_sender_domain,
reject_non_fqdn_sender, reject_rhsbl_sender rhsbl.sorbs.net,
reject_rbl_client maps_rbl_domains
strict_rfc821_envelopes = yes
transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
unknown_address_reject_code = 554
unknown_client_reject_code = 554
unknown_hostname_reject_code = 554
unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 554
unknown_relay_recipient_reject_code = 554
unknown_virtual_alias_reject_code = 554
unknown_virtual_mailbox_reject_code = 554
unknown_virtual_alias_reject_code = 554
unknown_virtual_mailbox_reject_code = 554
unverified_recipient_reject_code = 554
unverified_sender_reject_code = 554
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
--
CL Martinez
carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Maybe OT: Some strange problem with postfix
carlopmart wrote: Ralph Angenendt wrote: Are you sure that it is postfix sending that message? This should be visible from the *logs* Ralph, yes I am sure. I can't find any entry in log file about this problem. All mails appears as delivered. Postfix sends this message: Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/16/08 1:23 This is the mail system at host mail.domain.com. Your message was successfully delivered to the destination(s) listed below. If the message was delivered to mailbox you will receive no further notifications. Otherwise you may still receive notifications of mail delivery errors from other systems. Looks like the client wants to have a delivery notfication and postfix answers it. This seems to be a client configuration problem if it only happens with one client. Cheers, Ralph pgp0NJSM1vOGP.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: OT: Top Posting
William L. Maltby wrote: But keep in mind you were only a virtual ass. Not really one. And the person who labeled you as an ass may have been, in fact, the ass. Regardless, his was only a virtual opinion. And unless you have a personal relationship and really care what he felt... So that would have been the Virtual Johnny Hughes then, not the real one ;) http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-May/098996.html ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Maybe OT: Some strange problem with postfix
carlopmart wrote: Ralph Angenendt wrote: Looks like the client wants to have a delivery notfication and postfix answers it. This seems to be a client configuration problem if it only happens with one client. No, this problems occurs on several clients ... And not all are windows clients: my clients are linux, windows and mac. This happens when the clients want a delivery report - please see the mail client configuration. Ralph pgpKINBMpsTSB.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: OT: Top Posting
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 15:57 +0100, Ned Slider wrote: William L. Maltby wrote: But keep in mind you were only a virtual ass. Not really one. And the person who labeled you as an ass may have been, in fact, the ass. Regardless, his was only a virtual opinion. And unless you have a personal relationship and really care what he felt... So that would have been the Virtual Johnny Hughes then, not the real one ;) http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-May/098996.html Regardless of who it is... We've all (probably) had days where our best side was not displayed. I've been a virtual and real ass many times in my life. Mostly in my youth. As I got older, it happened less and less frequently. But I do expect that I will have future bouts assiness. The loss of sense of community engendered by cyberspace works with the environment of the younger set to dehumanize us. We become objects rather than persons. The is no prohibition against vile acts towards objects. It takes an awareness, personal effort and some discipline to resist this dehumanizing effect. For the folks that I have seen here long enough to come to know, I easily overlook small transgressions to are contrary to their normal behavior. This is easy because I can see and appreciate them as persons and fit the occasional human foibles into the context of the image of them I've developed. So whether it's Johnny or any of the other frequent denizens, an occasional slip doesn't even get remembered after a while. Generosity and forgiveness (as if it was really needed) towards others is easy when I look within myself and see them right there inside myself. For you TX folks, I'm an old AZ boy. I suspect we have some very similar views on things. But I'm also afraid that those commonly held principals have slipped into the past. Some for the good, some for the worse. *sigh*. snip sig stuff -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: OT: Top Posting
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:22:29AM -0400, William L. Maltby wrote: On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 15:57 +0100, Ned Slider wrote: William L. Maltby wrote: But keep in mind you were only a virtual ass. Not really one. And the person who labeled you as an ass may have been, in fact, the ass. Regardless, his was only a virtual opinion. And unless you have a personal relationship and really care what he felt... So that would have been the Virtual Johnny Hughes then, not the real one ;) http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-May/098996.html Regardless of who it is... Let's all have a virtual group hug and put this thread to rest. :-) Ray ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: OT: Top Posting - PLEASE STOP THIS POINTLESS POST
-- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers CEO, SoftDux Web: http://www.SoftDux.com Check out my technical blog, http://blog.softdux.com for Linux or other technical stuff, or visit http://www.WebHostingTalk.co.za for Web Hosting stuff ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Need help with rsync. [solved]
On Tue, May 20, 2008 11:15, James B. Byrne wrote: This is the relevant part of the command: rsync -avz --rsh=ssh --delete-after /var/data/pas-redmine [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/data The connection is made and a good deal of material is successfully transferred. I am however getting a number of permission errors: rsync: readlink /var/data/pas-redmine/lib/tabular_form_builder.rb failed: Permission denied (13) rsync: readlink /var/data/pas-redmine/lib/redmine.rb failed: Permission denied (13) rsync: readlink /var/data/pas-redmine/lib/diff.rb failed: Permission denied (13) and many more: This indeed turned out to be an SELinux policy problem which I have since resolved. Thanks for the suggestions. Sincerely, -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrnemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] XFS + LVM
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 6:31 AM, Jim Perrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you're using x86_64, you should have no real problem with xfs on top of LVM, because the x86_64 kernel uses 8K stacks instead. Also, keep in mind that grub in centos doesn't play well with partitions larger than 2TB, so the ideal solution would be to keep the OS on ext3, and create a /data/ xfs partition area with your 12TB We have had exactly this configuration (well, except it's only 7.5TB) running for six or seven months now, and have not had any problems with it. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] service --status-all hangs CentOS-4.6?
James B. Byrne wrote:
Is there a problem with running
# service --status-all
as root over ssh?
A system that I performed this command upon has become non-responsive on all
ports, leading me to conclude that it is either hung or the cpu is completely
consumed with some task.
Regards,
Output to point of failure:
...
Active Mount Points:
hcid is stopped
sdpd is stopped
hidd is stopped
cpuspeed is stopped
crond (pid 3334) is running...
cupsd (pid 3806) is running...
cups-config-daemon (pid 3404) is running...
dc_client is stopped
dc_server is stopped
dhcpd is stopped
Device not specified in /etc/sysconfig/diskdump
Usage: /etc/init.d/dkms_autoinstaller {start|stop}
sounds like some service in /etc/init.d crashed when it was invoked
with `status` as the argument. dkms_autoinstaller simply didn't
support status, so it returned that error.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re:Re:Can't get past the splash screen
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Eon Strife [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I checked the permission of that var/lib/nxserver/ (and folders (including /db/running/ ) and files inside it), the permission is 0700 (read,write,execute enabled for the owner), with the group is root and owner is the nx. And yes, also using the root I can view the content of the var/lib/nxserver. If I login using that new user, I can't view the content. No? Have you tried to 'su' in a terminal window to look at it? mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Need help with rsync. [solved]
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 8:37 AM, James B. Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This indeed turned out to be an SELinux policy problem which I have since resolved. Whoa, whoa, whoa, nice shooting, Tex! (Ghostbusters) Not so fast - please post the solution, too, for posterity (and those of us who don't use SELinux but might, someday, in the not too distant far future...). Thanks. mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] COBOL
Just curious, maybe some old timers could help me out. I am working with a company that is migrating 20 years of Mainframe Software Development to Unix, HPUX. How much harder would it be to go to Linux, Centos Linux? Also, anyone have any experience with Fujitsu Cobol on Centos? The Fujitsu people only support Red Hat, and said I'd be on my own with Centos. In other words if it works, then I don't care about Fujitsu support. I know some of you are thinking, did someone say COBOL? Nobody uses COBOL anymore! If so, let me say You are wrong. Many large corporations are taking their old business logic that was written in COBOL decades ago, and moving it to new modern platforms, like Linux. Programatically giving these applications a GUI face-lift, while maintaining their original business logic. I know because many companies pay me to do just that. I have a client that wants to use Centos Linux with Fujistu Cobol, and Fujitsu says it's gotta be Red Hat, any help will much appreciated. Thanks, -- Michael Anderson, J3k Solutions Sr.Systems Programmer/Analyst 832.515.3868 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] COBOL
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 13:47 -0500, Michael wrote: Also, anyone have any experience with Fujitsu Cobol on Centos? The Fujitsu people only support Red Hat, and said I'd be on my own with Centos. In other words if it works, then I don't care about Fujitsu support. Apparently Oracle is the only ISV that's figured out that CentOS *is* RHEL. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams [EMAIL PROTECTED] PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] COBOL
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 01:47:09PM -0500, Michael wrote: pay me to do just that. I have a client that wants to use Centos Linux with Fujistu Cobol, and Fujitsu says it's gotta be Red Hat, any help will much appreciated. Have the client buy ONE RedHat license so that if they do ever have an issue then they can replicate it on the RedHat machine and get Fujitsu support :-) -- rgds Stephen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] COBOL
Tony Placilla [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sr. UNIX Systems Administrator The Sheridan Libraries Johns Hopkins University On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 2:47 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just curious, maybe some old timers could help me out. I am working with a company that is migrating 20 years of Mainframe Software Development to Unix, HPUX. How much harder would it be to go to Linux, Centos Linux? Also, anyone have any experience with Fujitsu Cobol on Centos? The Fujitsu people only support Red Hat, and said I'd be on my own with Centos. In other words if it works, then I don't care about Fujitsu support. I know some of you are thinking, did someone say COBOL? Nobody uses COBOL anymore! If so, let me say You are wrong. Many large corporations are taking their old business logic that was written in COBOL decades ago, and moving it to new modern platforms, like Linux. Programatically giving these applications a GUI face-lift, while maintaining their original business logic. I know because many companies pay me to do just that. I have a client that wants to use Centos Linux with Fujistu Cobol, and Fujitsu says it's gotta be Red Hat, any help will much appreciated. Thanks, A datapoint the advice you get is worth what you pay. Where I work (in a Uni library) we encounter the same issue. The ISVs *only* support certify against RHEL. However, I do my development, test, staging, etc. on CentOS that I keep version compliant with upstream. I have had *no* problems. My short answer is, if it works on RHEL, it works on CentOS. Again, YMMV if it breaks, you get to keeps the pieces. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] COBOL
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 13:47 -0500, Michael wrote: Just curious, maybe some old timers could help me out. I am working with a company that is migrating 20 years of Mainframe Software Development to Unix, HPUX. How much harder would it be to go to Linux, Centos Linux? It really depends on two things: compatability of the COBOL flavors, legacy and Fujitsu, and competency of the folks doing the work in both legacy and new platforms. I can't answer the specifics of your query though. Last time I did these things was the 1984 - 1994 timeframes. But I can say it was duck soup. Naturally, it wasn't Fujitsu cobol. A few more words later on. Also, anyone have any experience with Fujitsu Cobol on Centos? The Fujitsu people only support Red Hat, and said I'd be on my own with Centos. In other words if it works, then I don't care about Fujitsu support. I know some of you are thinking, did someone say COBOL? Nobody uses COBOL anymore! If so, let me say You are wrong. Many large corporations are taking their old business logic that was written in COBOL decades ago, and moving it to new modern platforms, like Linux. Programatically giving these applications a GUI face-lift, while maintaining their original business logic. I know because many companies pay me to do just that. I have a client that wants to use Centos Linux with Fujistu Cobol, and Fujitsu says it's gotta be Red Hat, any help will much appreciated. I don't know if it's still around, but my efforts were using MicroFocus Cobol, which (IIRC) was eventually bought by SCO. I was porting mainframe application development to a three-tiered development architecture. Target apps would run on IBM mainframes, be developed, tested, debugged on DOS PCs (later on real UNIX System V). If MF COBOL is still available, might be worth a look. It was very good then. Should be very good now if still around. It was *very* compatible with the IBM flavor(s). The only significant changes were in the Configuration Section and adding screen-specific code. Of course, no i'net then, so I imagine there will be more stuff added to support net stuff. The most trouble, as I recall, was that most programmers were just so-so even at COBOL and had no concept of hardware issues or underlying OS issues at all. I can't tell you how many times I had to help various programmes out just because of mixing modes of read statements - read vs read into. Of course, I had a strong assembly background too, so I saw the implications (read locate mixed with read move mode as implied by the two forms of the COBOL read) that they may not have had the background to recognize. If the folks doing the work a competent on both platforms, or the team community knowledge includes that expertise and it's freely shared, should be just a lot of mechanical effort after the first couple of programs are converted. Thanks, HTH -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] COBOL
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 14:51 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: Apparently Oracle is the only ISV that's figured out that CentOS *is* RHEL. I was just told in no uncertain terms that it is not RHEL. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] COBOL
On Wed, 21 May 2008 15:12:58 -0400 William L. Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If MF COBOL is still available, might be worth a look. It was very good then. Should be very good now if still around. It was *very* compatible with the IBM flavor(s). I vaguely recall reading that there is some kind of a licensing gotcha in later versions of MicroFocus Cobol that apparently was not present in earlier versions. Anyone considering a MF Cobol installation may want to research the licensing situation carefully. I don't remember any specifics about it at all, other than what I have written above. It may have been resolved, or it may not have existed in the first place and be simply someone's misunderstanding of the situation. But it's worth checking out. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] COBOL
On Wed, May 21, 2008, Scott Nelson wrote: On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 13:47 -0500, Michael wrote: Just curious, maybe some old timers could help me out. I am working with a company that is migrating 20 years of Mainframe Software Development to Unix, HPUX. How much harder would it be to go to Linux, Centos Linux? Probably not hard at all -- I can't imagine a cobol compiler/runtime/ executable needing anything in HP/UX that isn't in Centos (or any other Linux for that matter). The bigger problem is getting the COBOL vendor to port to the version of Linux you want, Centos in this case. [...] anyone have any experience with Fujitsu Cobol on Centos? I have not, but we do use AcuCOBOL version 4 from AcuCorp which was recently bought by MicroFocus (they are up to version 8 now: http://www.microfocus.com/products/extend/ ) It's been years since I did serious work on COBOL, originally on Burroughs Medium Systems, then Ryan McFarland, and most recently Microfocus. The biggest problems I have seen recently with COBOL run times is that they were built on old libc5 with calls to errno which broke on recent versions of CentOS, and SuSE Linux Enterprise 9/10. The workaround on these was a couple of lines in the startup scripts: LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL Bill -- INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way Voice: (206) 236-1676 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820 Fax:(206) 232-9186 But how is this legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply. See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime. -- Frederic Bastiat, The Law ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] COBOL
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 14:26 -0500, Scott Nelson wrote: On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 13:47 -0500, Michael wrote: Just curious, maybe some old timers could help me out. I am working with a company that is migrating 20 years of Mainframe Software Development to Unix, HPUX. How much harder would it be to go to Linux, Centos Linux? Probably not hard at all -- I can't imagine a cobol compiler/runtime/ executable needing anything in HP/UX that isn't in Centos (or any other Linux for that matter). The bigger problem is getting the COBOL vendor to port to the version of Linux you want, Centos in this case. [...] anyone have any experience with Fujitsu Cobol on Centos? I have not, but we do use AcuCOBOL version 4 from AcuCorp which was recently bought by MicroFocus (they are up to version 8 now: http://www.microfocus.com/products/extend/ ) Scott I also used AcuCobol, after I left The Big Company, on an SCO micro-based application. It was also quite decent. No surprises discovered. snip sig stuff -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] COBOL
Michael wrote: Just curious, maybe some old timers could help me out. I am working with a company that is migrating 20 years of Mainframe Software Development to Unix, HPUX. How much harder would it be to go to Linux, Centos Linux? Also, anyone have any experience with Fujitsu Cobol on Centos? The Fujitsu people only support Red Hat, and said I'd be on my own with Centos. In other words if it works, then I don't care about Fujitsu support. I know some of you are thinking, did someone say COBOL? Nobody uses COBOL anymore! If so, let me say You are wrong. Many large corporations are taking their old business logic that was written in COBOL decades ago, and moving it to new modern platforms, like Linux. Programatically giving these applications a GUI face-lift, while maintaining their original business logic. I know because many companies pay me to do just that. I have a client that wants to use Centos Linux with Fujistu Cobol, and Fujitsu says it's gotta be Red Hat, any help will much appreciated. I would just buy the RH licenses for the project. CentOS may work well for development and testing platform, but the production code should be on fully supported RHEL. I haven't done Cobol and Fortran programming since college where I learned these on the DEC VAX VMS systems. It was interesting to see VMS also running on the DEC Alphas at the time since I always associated it with minis. -Ross __ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] COBOL
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:21 PM, James Bunnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was just told in no uncertain terms that it is not RHEL. True, but the formal releases of CentOS are 100% compatible with the corresponding upstream release. (That's the whole point.) IOW, if it works in RH, it should work on CentOS. There are some exceptions for code that explicitly checks for RH. However, I am repeating what I have seen here - there are other, much better informed sources here than I. mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Maybe OT: Some strange problem with postfix
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 9:48 AM, carlopmart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: delivery via localhost[127.0.0.1]:10025: 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as D61DDEC962 content_filter = imss:localhost:10025 Did you check if this could be related to whatever is running on port 10025? How is your master.cf setup? Filipe ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] XFS + LVM
On Wednesday 21 May 2008, Alain Terriault, Mr. wrote: Hi, I see old post on the web discouraging the use of XFS on top of LVM, mostly seems to be driver problems .. in any case it was not reassuring. I was wondering, with current drivers and kernels (CentOS5), if they are any issue doing so. I have no real need for LVM, I am just use to it and occasionally found it useful. It is my first time building a 12T partition and for my usage I think XFS seems to be the way to go. It will mostly be use for uncompress audio storage. Any comments will be more than welcome, sure, here you go: 1) don't hijack threads, use new, not reply when starting a thread 2) we have many servers with XFS on LVM, works fine 3) as Jim said, use x86_64 due to the 4K stack issue with i386. Also use the kmod-xfs from extras with the normal kernel, don't rebuild or change your kernel for no reason. 4) depending on what you have under you may see performance some performance drops with LVM (compared to say a partition-table of GPT type) due to the fact that LVM splits stuff into page size chunks (4K typically). 5) when setting read-ahead (important for seq. read performance) then remember to set it on the lv device, not the pv device. /Peter signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
