Re: [CentOS] Security Guide for CentOS/RHEL
Nick Goddard wrote: > aide is now provided in 4.7 as well. I installed aide and did # aide --init. Does it not mail root like tripwire used to each morning? The manual is does not mention mailing root. http://www.cs.tut.fi/~rammer/aide/manual.html Thanks, Josh. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Security Guide for CentOS/RHEL
On Friday 19 September 2008 09:08, Josh Donovan wrote: > Nick Goddard wrote: > > aide is now provided in 4.7 as well. > > I installed aide and did # aide --init. Does it not mail > root like tripwire used to each morning? The manual is > does not mention mailing root. > > http://www.cs.tut.fi/~rammer/aide/manual.html > > Thanks, > Josh. Hi, I just put a simple script into /etc/cron.daily that called 'aide --check' and piped the output through mail to an appropriate account. Regards Nick. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] usb irq problem
hallo to all . This is my first post to this list so please bare with me if i have made any mistake . My problem is : after every boot i receive the following message in terminal : > Sep 19 13:13:02 station2 kernel: irq 50: nobody cared (try booting with the > "irqpoll" option) > Sep 19 13:13:02 station2 kernel: [] __report_bad_irq+0x2b/0x69 > Sep 19 13:13:02 station2 kernel: [] note_interrupt+0x1af/0x1e8 > Sep 19 13:13:02 station2 kernel: [] usb_hcd_irq+0x23/0x50 > Sep 19 13:13:02 station2 kernel: [] handle_IRQ_event+0x23/0x49 > Sep 19 13:13:02 station2 kernel: [] __do_IRQ+0x9b/0xd6 > Sep 19 13:13:02 station2 kernel: [] do_IRQ+0x93/0xae > Sep 19 13:13:02 station2 kernel: [] common_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 > Sep 19 13:13:02 station2 kernel: === > Sep 19 13:13:02 station2 kernel: handlers: > Sep 19 13:13:02 station2 kernel: [] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0x50) > Sep 19 13:13:02 station2 kernel: Disabling IRQ #5 And immediately after it my external usb drive vanishes from the nautilus file browser and i get messages like this in /var/log/messages : > usb 2-2: device not accepting address 3, error -110 > Sep 19 14:15:09 station2 kernel: usb 2-2: new high speed USB device using > ehci_hcd and address 4 > Sep 19 14:15:21 station2 kernel: usb 2-2: device not accepting address 4, > error -110 > Sep 19 14:15:21 station2 kernel: usb 2-2: new high speed USB device using > ehci_hcd and address 5 > Sep 19 14:15:31 station2 kernel: usb 2-2: device not accepting address 5, > error -110 > Sep 19 14:15:31 station2 kernel: usb 2-2: new high speed USB device using > ehci_hcd and address 6 > Sep 19 14:15:42 station2 kernel: usb 2-2: device not accepting address 6, > error -110 > Sep 19 14:16:48 station2 kernel: usb 2-4: new high speed USB device using > ehci_hcd and address 7 > Sep 19 14:17:00 station2 kernel: usb 2-4: device not accepting address 7, > error -110 > Sep 19 14:17:00 station2 kernel: usb 2-4: new high speed USB device using > ehci_hcd and address 8 > Sep 19 14:17:11 station2 kernel: usb 2-4: device not accepting address 8, > error -110 > and the usb drive does not show up in nautilus any more. Then i have to reboot and after logging into x the drive shows up .but again after some time the same thing happens. please help. i don't know if i have given enough information.so please tell me if any more info is needed. Thanks. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] usb irq problem
partha chowdhury wrote: >> Sep 19 13:13:02 station2 kernel: irq 50: nobody cared (try booting with the >> "irqpoll" option) > and the usb drive does not show up in nautilus any more. Then i have > to reboot and after logging into x the drive shows up .but again after > some time the same thing happens. > > please help. What happens when you do what the error message above asks you to do? When grub comes up, hit a key, then hit "a" to append something to the kernel command line and then add irqpoll to the end of the kernel command line. If that works, edit /etc/grub.conf and add "irqpoll" to the end of the kernel command line there. Ralph pgpF4jl2zDBTl.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Install X from DVD
hi all, I have an issue where I must not have selected X at install time as its not there. I dont have networking on this box. I can put the DVD back in unit but I dont have X to run and to software add/remove. How do I do this from the command line with no network so no yum install package. so mount the DVD, cd into the RPMS directory then what command do I run to install all packages for X from the current directory. Thanks, jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Install X from DVD
Jerry Geis wrote: > I have an issue where I must not have selected X at install time as its > not there. > I dont have networking on this box. > I can put the DVD back in unit but I dont have X to run and to software > add/remove. If you haven't done *any* upgrade on that machine yet, use the CentOS-Media repo (the .repo file is where all other .repo files are). Disable all other repos, enable that and do a "yum grouplist". You'll see what group you have to install. Ralph pgpFjD2S6nu0q.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 43, Issue 8
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2008:0893 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 bzip2 Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CESA-2008:0893 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 bzip2 Update (Johnny Hughes) -- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:02:05 -0500 From: Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0893 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 bzip2 Update To: CentOS-Announce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0893 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0893.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: bzip2-1.0.2-14.el4_7.x86_64.rpm bzip2-devel-1.0.2-14.el4_7.i386.rpm bzip2-devel-1.0.2-14.el4_7.x86_64.rpm bzip2-libs-1.0.2-14.el4_7.i386.rpm bzip2-libs-1.0.2-14.el4_7.x86_64.rpm src: bzip2-1.0.2-14.el4_7.src.rpm -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 251 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20080918/3e405d66/signature-0001.bin -- Message: 2 Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:02:23 -0500 From: Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0893 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 bzip2 Update To: CentOS-Announce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0893 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0893.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: bzip2-1.0.2-14.el4_7.i386.rpm bzip2-devel-1.0.2-14.el4_7.i386.rpm bzip2-libs-1.0.2-14.el4_7.i386.rpm src: bzip2-1.0.2-14.el4_7.src.rpm -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 251 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20080918/dbcbd9c3/signature-0001.bin -- ___ CentOS-announce mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 43, Issue 8 ** ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] usb irq problem
i add the "irqpoll" option to kernel line. after the system booted i log into X with tty1 also login as root with the command " tail -f /var/log/messages" for monitoring . After 10 to 20 minutes i got the same message again but this time immediately the system froze up ! i tried it 5 times now and each time is the same result.i also noticed that the system was behaving very slowly till the message came up like usually folder copy operation - i usually get 70-90MB/s according to vmstat 1 comand, but with irqpoll the maximum i noticed was like 10MB/s. Am i doing something wrong ? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Install X from DVD
If you haven't done *any* upgrade on that machine yet, use the CentOS-Media repo (the .repo file is where all other .repo files are). Disable all other repos, enable that and do a "yum grouplist". You'll see what group you have to install. Ralph Ralph, Ok part of my problem was I was mounting the DVD under /mnt/cdrom instead of /media/cdrom. yum repolist gives yum repolist Loading "fastestmirror" plugin repo id repo name status addons CentOS-5 - Addons enabled base CentOS-5 - Base enabled extras CentOS-5 - Extras enabled updates CentOS-5 - Updatesenabled however when I do the "yum grouplist" its still trying to do the network yum not MEDIA repo and I get errors. I am still missing something. Thanks, Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Install X from DVD
Jerry Geis wrote: >> >> If you haven't done *any* upgrade on that machine yet, use the >> CentOS-Media repo (the .repo file is where all other .repo files are). >> >> Disable all other repos, enable that and do a "yum grouplist". You'll ^^^ ^^ >> see what group you have to install. > > Ok part of my problem was I was mounting the DVD under /mnt/cdrom > instead of /media/cdrom. > > yum repolist gives > yum repolist > Loading "fastestmirror" plugin > repo id repo name status > addons CentOS-5 - Addons enabled > base CentOS-5 - Base enabled > extras CentOS-5 - Extras enabled > updates CentOS-5 - Updatesenabled > > however when I do the "yum grouplist" > its still trying to do the network yum not MEDIA repo and I get errors. > > I am still missing something.o I underlined it for you. Ralph pgp9JcXSDdho3.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Install X from DVD
Jerry Geis wrote: >>/ />>/ If you haven't done *any* upgrade on that machine yet, use the />>/ CentOS-Media repo (the .repo file is where all other .repo files are). />>/ />>/ Disable all other repos, enable that and do a "yum grouplist". You'll / ^^^ ^^ >>/ see what group you have to install. />/ />/ Ok part of my problem was I was mounting the DVD under /mnt/cdrom />/ instead of /media/cdrom. />/ />/ yum repolist gives />/ yum repolist />/ Loading "fastestmirror" plugin />/ repo id repo name status />/ addons CentOS-5 - Addons enabled />/ base CentOS-5 - Base enabled />/ extras CentOS-5 - Extras enabled />/ updates CentOS-5 - Updatesenabled />/ />/ however when I do the "yum grouplist" />/ its still trying to do the network yum not MEDIA repo and I get errors. />/ />/ I am still missing something.o / I underlined it for you. Ralph Sorry, I wasnt getting the first time. I never had the edit the repo files before and change enabled=1 for the Media then add the line enabled=0 to every base repo. So now it starts off and looks like its going to do it but then it says failed dependencies on openssh4.3p2-26.el5 Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Install X from DVD
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 09:43 -0400, Jerry Geis wrote: > > > > > Sorry, I wasnt getting the first time. I never had the edit the repo yum --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=c5-media That lets you do a temporary override. "Man yum" is suggested. > files before and change > enabled=1 for the Media > then add the line > enabled=0 to every base repo. > > So now it starts off and looks like its going to do it but then it > says > failed dependencies on openssh4.3p2-26.el5 Install it from the same place? > > Jerry > HTH -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Picasa vs. native photo management apps
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 2:30 AM, Niki Kovacs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The GIMP probably is going to require a very *long* learning curve. It >> has the power of >> Adobe Photoshop and may not be something casual users are going to want >> to take the time to learn. > > Admittedly. But more in the sense of learning a few very basic steps that > everybody needs to know: > > - photo redimensioning > - slimming them down (bytewise) > - turning a color photograph into black and white > - some basic effects (one-click, included) I recommend taking a good look at Digicam. For the types of tasks listed above, its very good and fairly easy. It also supports bulk processing, tagging images, etc. Its part image database and part image manipulator. Mike ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Install X from DVD
Jerry Geis wrote: Jerry Geis wrote: >>/ />>/ If you haven't done *any* upgrade on that machine yet, use the />>/ CentOS-Media repo (the .repo file is where all other .repo files are). />>/ />>/ Disable all other repos, enable that and do a "yum grouplist". You'll / ^^^ ^^ >>/ see what group you have to install. />/ />/ Ok part of my problem was I was mounting the DVD under /mnt/cdrom />/ instead of /media/cdrom. />/ />/ yum repolist gives />/ yum repolist />/ Loading "fastestmirror" plugin />/ repo id repo name status />/ addons CentOS-5 - Addons enabled />/ base CentOS-5 - Base enabled />/ extras CentOS-5 - Extras enabled />/ updates CentOS-5 - Updatesenabled />/ />/ however when I do the "yum grouplist" />/ its still trying to do the network yum not MEDIA repo and I get errors. />/ />/ I am still missing something.o / I underlined it for you. Ralph Sorry, I wasnt getting the first time. I never had the edit the repo files before and change enabled=1 for the Media then add the line enabled=0 to every base repo. So now it starts off and looks like its going to do it but then it says failed dependencies on openssh4.3p2-26.el5 Jerry I'm not sure how you got to that point while trying to install X on that machine but UNLESS there has been other stuff added from who-knows-where, yum will resolve the dependencies. That's what yum does. (You did read the 1st sentence of Ralph's 1st reply, right? -- "If you haven't done *any* upgrade on that machine yet,")? Once that system has been cross-pollinated, all bets are off. If you *have* loaded that baby down with updates and/or packages from Fedora, EPEL, rpmforge, sourceforge, etc., then you will likely have a bunch of head-scratchin' in your near and distant future. Un-bastardization is kinda like un-ringing a bell. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Network issues with CentOS 5.2
I appreciate your reply to my email. The steps ou have given me are things that I have done and are already in place. I still cannot get the eth to activate unless I issue it a static IP it for some reason will not activate under the DHCP selection. Has anyone ever experienced this. If I do assign it an IP it will activate but still has no internet connection. I can ping itself but cannot ping any machine outside of it or have a machine outside be able to ping it. Lanny Marcus wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Joey Mendez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am totally new to using CentOS. Linux in Genera really. I have decent experiencing with terminal code for Macs though. Jose: Welcome! Here's the deal my Boss wants us to move more toward linux for some of our basic users. All I was supposed to do was install CentOS 5.2 and Open Office and disburse the machines. Simple enough right. So I did this with no issue. I ran the interface and installed only GNOME and KDE. After installation was complete I activated the eth-0 and had it on DHCP. I connected to the net fine and began downloading open office. I left for the day and came back and I can no longer get back online. The eth-0 wont even activate unless I manually enter a static IP but still can not establish a connection online. I treid reinstalling to no avail. Even built a completely new box and still no avail. I am using CentOS 5.2 i386 DVD. Like I said I am new to this so any guidance would be appreciated to get me into the Linux world. Thank you. Linux is based on UNIX and networking started there. Networking will work for you! I normally install both GNOME and KDE, but 99% of the time, I use GNOME. When I install from a DVD, I install the majority of Applications and Systems things I want at that time. Then, in a Terminal Window (as root), do "yum update" to update everything to the latest version, for Security and Stability reasons. In GNOME, at the lower left hand corner, click on System > Administration >Network and enter the password for root (the super user). That brings you to a GUI utility called system-config-network Be sure that eth0 is shown as "Active" and then highlight it and click on "Edit". Be sure that "Activate Device when computer starts is checked". And, "Automatically obtain IP with DHCP". And, Automatically obtain DNS. A book I can recommend to you, would be the edition that covers Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5, of "Red Hat Fedora and Enterprise Linux Bible" by Christopher Negus. I'm sure that there are other excellent books, but this one will explain a lot to you. I think the version that covers RHEL 5 (CentOS is a rebuild of RHEL) is "Fedora 6 and Red Hat Enterprise Linux Bible", however you need to verify that, before you buy it, because I have an older version of the book. Please note that much of the book is about Fedora Core. Red Hat Enterprise Linux takes the best of Fedora Core and is a much more stable distribution, without the "latest and greatest". So, the book will help you with CentOS, because CentOS is a rebuild of RHEL. HTH, Lanny in Colombia ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos . -- Jose Mendez Computer Resource Specialist HNRC 619-543-8090 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Network issues with CentOS 5.2
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Joey Mendez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I appreciate your reply to my email. The steps ou have given me are things > that I have done and are already in place. I still cannot get the eth to > activate unless I issue it a static IP it for some reason will not activate > under the DHCP selection. Has anyone ever experienced this. > > If I do assign it an IP it will activate but still has no internet > connection. I can ping itself but cannot ping any machine outside of it or > have a machine outside be able to ping it. > Hi, For internet to work properly dns servers needs to be entered if you are using static ipaddress. Open the terminal and edit /etc/resolv.conf file through any text editor and enter dns servers domain example.com # Incase you want this domain to be your default domain nameserver xx.xx.xx.xx # Dns Server ipaddress or hostname nameserver xx.xx.xx.xx# DNS Server ipadddress or hostname save the file and restart nscd service service nscd restart As you mentioned you are not able to ping the machine outside kindly check the firewall rules aka iptables. iptables -L If you don't want to use iptables or firewall on this machine then run the below commands iptables -F service iptables save chkconfig iptables off Now check the network connectivity by pinging other machines. Note: You need to be root to perform the above steps Regards Ankush ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] using NOPASSWD in sudoers
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:19 PM, Ski Dawg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > I am trying to change our /etc/sudoers (using visudo) to allow 2 > commands to be run as root without a password, but it isn't working. > Here is the part of the sudoers file that is in question. > > # User alias specification > User_Alias FULLACCESS = doug, scott > > # members of the FULLACCESS User_Alias may run chown and chmod without > a password > FULLACCESS ALL = (root) NOPASSWD: /bin/chown, /bin/chmod > > # members of the FULLACCESS User_Alias may run anything but need a password > FULLACCESS ALL=(root) ALL > > The part for requiring a password works, but not the NOPASSWD line. I > have tried changing the order of these lines with no change in > behavior. After each change to the sudoers file, I am logging out of > the machine and logging back in to make sure that it is properly > reading the changes. > > I have also replaced the list of commands with a Cmnd_Alias, with no > change in behavior. > > Any thoughts or suggestions about what I am missing. > -- Hi, Can you remove (root) and then try for NOPASSWD Regards Ankush ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Network issues with CentOS 5.2
Joey Mendez wrote: > I appreciate your reply to my email. The steps ou have given me are > things that I have done and are already in place. I still cannot get the > eth to activate unless I issue it a static IP it for some reason will > not activate under the DHCP selection. Has anyone ever experienced this. > > If I do assign it an IP it will activate but still has no internet > connection. I can ping itself but cannot ping any machine outside of it > or have a machine outside be able to ping it. What kind of network card? what network chip, what driver is being used? My best guess at this point is the driver doesn't fully support the network card so traffic cannot pass. Maybe the card is too new. Run ethtool eth0 (assuming your using eth0), and verify there is a link detected as well. nate ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Network issues with CentOS 5.2
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Joey Mendez > Sent: Friday, 19 September 2008 9:09 AM > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: [CentOS] Network issues with CentOS 5.2 Snip > DHCP. I connected to the net fine and began downloading open office. I > left for the day and came back and I can no longer get back online. The > eth-0 wont even activate unless I manually enter a static IP but still > can not establish a connection online. I treid reinstalling to no avail. > Even built a completely new box and still no avail. I am using CentOS > 5.2 i386 DVD. I experienced something similar and it turned out that if you run an update and the kernel changes, then you need to update the network drivers to match up with the installed kernel. If you provide details on the type of NIC on your system, I may be able to provide more help. Cheers, AK. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Update troubles for wxGTK apps
Hi, I have a CentOS 5.2 desktop with the RPMForge repo enabled. I just ran 'yum update', and there seems to be some trouble with the wxGTK apps. A simple 'yum update' gives this error message: --8< --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_gtk2u_adv-2.6.so.0 is needed by package audacity Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.6.so.0 is needed by package audacity Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_gtk2u_html-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6) is needed by package audacity Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_gtk2u_html-2.6.so.0 is needed by package audacity Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_baseu_net-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6) is needed by package audacity Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_baseu-2.6.so.0 is needed by package audacity Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_gtk2u_qa-2.6.so.0 is needed by package audacity Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6) is needed by package audacity Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6.2) is needed by package audacity Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_baseu-2.6.so.0(WXU_2.6) is needed by package audacity Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_baseu_net-2.6.so.0 is needed by package audacity Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_gtk2u_core-2.6.so.0 is needed by package audacity Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_baseu_xml-2.6.so.0 is needed by package audacity --8< But when I put an exclude line in /etc/yum.conf for wxGTK, the error message becomes: --8< Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_baseu-2.8.so.0 is needed by package amule Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_baseu-2.8.so.0(WXU_2.8) is needed by package amule Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_gtk2u_richtext-2.8.so.0 is needed by package vlc Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_gtk2u_adv-2.8.so.0 is needed by package vlc Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_gtk2u_adv-2.8.so.0(WXU_2.8) is needed by package vlc Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_baseu-2.8.so.0 is needed by package vlc Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_baseu-2.8.so.0(WXU_2.8) is needed by package vlc Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_gtk2u_aui-2.8.so.0 is needed by package vlc Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0(WXU_2.8) is needed by package vlc Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_baseu_net-2.8.so.0 is needed by package amule Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_gtk2u_adv-2.8.so.0(WXU_2.8) is needed by package amule Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_baseu_net-2.8.so.0 is needed by package vlc Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_gtk2u_qa-2.8.so.0 is needed by package vlc Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_baseu_xml-2.8.so.0 is needed by package vlc Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_baseu_net-2.8.so.0(WXU_2.8) is needed by package amule Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0 is needed by package amule Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_gtk2u_adv-2.8.so.0 is needed by package amule Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_gtk2u_html-2.8.so.0 is needed by package vlc Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0(WXU_2.8) is needed by package amule Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.8.so.0 is needed by package vlc Error: Missing Dependency: libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0 is needed by package vlc --8< So it looks like Audacity depends on wxGTK 2.6, whereas Amule and VLC depend on wxGTK 2.8. 1) Where do I report a bug for that? 2) In the meantime, what can I do? Simply exclude vlc, amule, audacity and wxGTK from updates in /etc/yum.conf and wait until the problem is resolved? Cheers, Niki Kovacs ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Update troubles for wxGTK apps
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Niki Kovacs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a CentOS 5.2 desktop with the RPMForge repo enabled. I just ran 'yum > update', and there seems to be some trouble with the wxGTK apps. A simple > 'yum update' gives this error message: > So it looks like Audacity depends on wxGTK 2.6, whereas Amule and VLC depend > on wxGTK 2.8. > > 1) Where do I report a bug for that? > > 2) In the meantime, what can I do? Simply exclude vlc, amule, audacity and > wxGTK from updates in /etc/yum.conf and wait until the problem is resolved? Some info here: http://planet.centos.org/ Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Update troubles for wxGTK apps
Akemi Yagi a écrit : Some info here: http://planet.centos.org/ Thanks for the info. Niki ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Network issues with CentOS 5.2
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Joey Mendez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I appreciate your reply to my email. The steps ou have given me are things > that I have done and are already in place. I still cannot get the eth to > activate unless I issue it a static IP it for some reason will not activate > under the DHCP selection. Has anyone ever experienced this. > > If I do assign it an IP it will activate but still has no internet > connection. I can ping itself but cannot ping any machine outside of it or > have a machine outside be able to ping it. Jose: Two things: (a) please do not TOP POST on this mailing list. (b) I wonder if the NIC is working properly? If it's an onboard NIC, can you disable it and install another NIC, to see if you have connectivity? If it's a PCI card, pull it out and install another NIC, preferably another model. Lanny ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Problem with Arima HDAMA rev.G with Integrated SiliconImage Sil3114 Serial ATA 4 Ports and 1TB SATA disks. Recomendation for a cheap SATA controller for linux software raid?
Dear Everybody, I am telling you the whole story, perhaps you can give me a better idea. Almost 3 years ago I purchased Arima HDAMA rev. G motherboard with integrated Silicon Image Sil3114 Serial ATA 4 Ports SATA I adapter. ( http://www.arimacorp.com/ViewProduct.asp?View=86 ) . BIOS version is 2.13. My intention is to make a file server, using linux software raid, so I bought 2 new shiny 1TB SATA II disks, and installed them. Unfortunately the system does not boot - hangs in the Sil 3114 BIOS initialization stage. Apparently this is a known problem with Sil3114 and Sil3112: ( http://forums.seagate.com/stx/board/message?board.id=ata_drives&message.id=970 ) The Silicon people have issued a BIOS update for this issue, however they explicitly state - only for ADD-IN cards. Perhaps, integrated controlers share the same eeprom chip with the motherboard BIOS, and an attempt to flash it - will render the system unbootable. For integrated controllers - the mainboard producer should provide the update. Apparently the Arima people have sold their business to http://www.flextronics.com/en/default.aspx. The new site is at http://www.flextronics.com/arima/server/Product/ViewDownload.asp?View=HDAMA%20rev.G. The last BIOS update is from 8/30/2006. And I think this patch well predates the 1TB hard disks and has been issued before SiliconImage's patch: ( http://www.siliconimage.com/support/supportsearchresults.aspx?pid=28&cid=15&ctid=2&osid=0&; ) . So I am not willing to risk a BIOS update and I have decided to spend additional cash on a cheap but fast 4 port SATA II controller and use it with Centos 5.2. Where I reside, the following two have caught my attention: ADAPTEC SATA RAID 1420SA Serial ATA-150/Serial ATA II-300 PCI-X 4ch for 120 USD ( http://www.adaptec.com/en-US/products/Controllers/Hardware/sata/entry/AAR-1420SA/ ) and PROMISE FastTrak TX4300 Serial ATA II-300 PCI 4ch for 160 USD ( http://www.promise.com/product/product_detail_eng.asp?segment=RAID%200/1%20HBAs&product_id=137 ) Do you have any experience any of these 2 adapters, operating as plain SATA controllers, under linux software raid? Which one would you recommend? Best regards, Alex ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Multiple Linux instances on the same box - dual/triple/etc boot ?
Hi List; I have a new dev server. As an independent consultant I want to maximize it's use. Some of my clients use RedHat/CentOS 64 bit, others Redhat/CentOS 32bit, some are even using Fedora and Debian. Here's my thought: I'd like to install each OS/version into it's own space on the disk. I'm thinking all I have to do is install one OS (say CentOS 64bit) and partition say 20% of the disk. Then once the install is done, boot into the latest fedora disk and do the same, etc. Is this correct ? Later I want to add a disk array and allocate a RAID mount point that can be mounted by any of the installed Linux'es when it's active. Is this do-able ? Easily ? Thanks in advance... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] netfilter kernel crash in ip_ct_refresh_acct / ip_conntrack with centos 5.x
> Hello! > > Has anyone seen this netfilter kernel crash? > > Images from the console of the crashed firewall: > http://pasik.reaktio.net/centos5-kernel-crash/ > > Firewall is HP DL360 G4 server running CentOS 5.x 32 bit. > > I've seen this firewall crashing multiple times, but I only started investigating it lately.. > > It has happened using CentOS 5.0, 5.1 and now also with 5.2. I'm not sure if > it was the same bug earlier, but at least the last two times (with CentOS 5.2) > it has been the same, see screenshots. > > Last lines of the console output: > > EIP: [] __ip_ct_refresh_acct+0xa1/0x129 [ip_conntrack] SS:ESP 0068:c0724e4c > <0>Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt > > At the moment firewall is running CentOS 5.2, Linux kernel 2.6.18-92.1.10.el5.centos.plus. > > Any tips how to resolve this? Take a look here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433661 Looks like a test kernel is available We've been having this problem for quite some time - actually moved our production box to RHEL 4.x Jake ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: Digital Video Editor for CentOS 5.2 - Suggestions?
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 5:23 PM, John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> almost all MiniDV camcorders capture video via IEEE1394 ("Firewire"), its
> the standard for the DV format. The ones that have USB, that port is
> generally used only for still photo.
>
> DVD camcorders and hard disk camcorders use higher levels of compression
> that aren't as suitable for editing as DV, however, they are less likely to
> use IEEE1394.
When I began this thread, on 05 August, I thought we were going to get
the camcorder the next day. We finally got it yesterday! Very long
delay, for the company where my stepson works, to approve it for sale,
at a deep discount...It is DVD and from a review I read about
the camcorder, the quality, with DVD, isn't as good, but, they are
very easy to use. No need to buy a PCI Firewire card. :-) All of the
replies
I got to this thread are greatly appreciated! When I began the thread,
I knew nothing about digital camcorders (our old one is VHS-C).
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Multiple Linux instances on the same box - dual/triple/etc boot ?
kevin kempter wrote: Hi List; I have a new dev server. As an independent consultant I want to maximize it's use. Some of my clients use RedHat/CentOS 64 bit, others Redhat/CentOS 32bit, some are even using Fedora and Debian. Here's my thought: I'd like to install each OS/version into it's own space on the disk. I'm thinking all I have to do is install one OS (say CentOS 64bit) and partition say 20% of the disk. Then once the install is done, boot into the latest fedora disk and do the same, etc. Is this correct ? Later I want to add a disk array and allocate a RAID mount point that can be mounted by any of the installed Linux'es when it's active. Is this do-able ? Easily ? Yes you can do that, but if you have plenty of RAM you might find it nicer to install the OS you'll run most on the base hardware, then install the free vmware server and install all the others as vmware guests so you can run one or more without having to reboot or shut down the base system. The guest images normally live in ordinary files on the host so they are easy to manage and they can nfs-mount a common share from the host or other system fo access to common space. -- Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problem with Arima HDAMA rev.G with Integrated SiliconImage Sil3114 Serial ATA 4 Ports and 1TB SATA disks. Recomendation for a cheap SATA controller for linux software raid?
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Alexander Georgiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So I am not willing to risk a BIOS update and I have decided to spend > additional cash on a cheap but fast 4 port SATA II controller and use > it with Centos 5.2. > If you think $120-160 is cheap, I'm wondering if your company needs more software engineers ;^) I have had good luck with Adaptec controllers in the past, and no experience with Promise, but w.r.t. SATA I couldn't give you any input. FTR, my m/b only does SATA-I, and spent a little time looking for a cheap PCI-SATA-II board (so I could run my SATA-II disks at full transfer speed) but the cheapest one I found was $60-70, and if I'm going to spend that much, I might as well get a new m/b that supports SATA-II (they're cheaper!). I know that's not much help - sorry. Hope someone else will have more info mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Multiple Linux instances on the same box - dual/triple/etc boot ?
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes you can do that, but if you have plenty of RAM you might find it nicer > to install the OS you'll run most on the base hardware, then install the > free vmware server and install all the others as vmware guests so you can > run one or more without having to reboot or shut down the base system. The > guest images normally live in ordinary files on the host so they are easy to > manage and they can nfs-mount a common share from the host or other system > fo access to common space. > Nfs-mount? I've been using Samba for the cross-mounting because the server doesn't come with sharable disk mounts like the workstation does. Of course, I'm using Windows in VMWare under CentOS, so the fundamental system differences may come into play, too (I don't know how to nfs-mount a Linux disk from Windows...). mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange browser displays with 5.x on Dell GX-260
Lanny Marcus wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 6:22 AM, William L. Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 02:47 -0400, Dick Roth wrote: This was a clean install, however I kept my /home directory intact. The rest of the partitions were reformatted. Try resetting all your preferences? Maybe a major format change in the control files under .mozilla directories? When you launched Mozilla Firefox the first time, I suspect that it created a new .mozilla directory in /home and wiped out your old one. Have you tried to "yum remove firefox" and then "yum install firefox" to see if the issues stop or continue? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Renaming ~/.mozilla and reinstalling Firefox cured my problems. Apparently the .mozilla file in my Home directory, which was not re-formatted, was at odds with the new install. There was a bit of work to reclaim bookmarks, but all appears to be well now. Thanks to Lanny and Jerry for the help. Dick -- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." --Benjamin Franklin 1755 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Network issues with CentOS 5.2
nate wrote: Joey Mendez wrote: I appreciate your reply to my email. The steps ou have given me are things that I have done and are already in place. I still cannot get the eth to activate unless I issue it a static IP it for some reason will not activate under the DHCP selection. Has anyone ever experienced this. If I do assign it an IP it will activate but still has no internet connection. I can ping itself but cannot ping any machine outside of it or have a machine outside be able to ping it. What kind of network card? what network chip, what driver is being used? Realtek 8111/8168b module 8169 No link detected. When I attempt to install the driver that came on the CD with the box r8168-8.006.00. Once I get to the step to Make Clean Modules all I get is errors My best guess at this point is the driver doesn't fully support the network card so traffic cannot pass. Maybe the card is too new. Run ethtool eth0 (assuming your using eth0), and verify there is a link detected as well. nate ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Jose Mendez Computer Resource Specialist HNRC 619-543-8090 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Up2date for 4.7?
The mirrors are missing the headers folders which prevents up2date from working. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100- - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Network issues with CentOS 5.2
Joey Mendez wrote: > When I attempt to install the driver that came on the CD with the box > r8168-8.006.00. Once I get to the step to Make Clean Modules all I get > is errors Do you have the kernel-devel package for your kernel installed? yum install kernel-devel-`uname -r` kernel-headers-`uname -r` And try the module build again, if it fails post the output of the command. You could configure a serial console and access the system that way in order to copy/paste, or perhaps install CentOS in a VM and try to compile the module there so you can get the error from the compile. But it may be easier/better to get another NIC. Realtek doesn't have a good history of making stable NICs under linux/*bsd. nate ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Multiple Linux instances on the same box - dual/triple/etc boot ?
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 13:52 -0600, kevin kempter wrote: > I'd like to install each OS/version into it's own space on the disk. > I'm thinking all I have to do is install one OS (say CentOS 64bit) and > partition say 20% of the disk. Then once the install is done, boot > into the latest fedora disk and do the same, etc. > > Is this correct ? Yes, but you should probably use a shared /boot, which means 3 things: 1) Make /boot larger. 350MB should do. 2) ONLY format /boot during the FIRST installation. Each install will throw its kernel in there, so formatting it after would be bad. 3) Change the menu entry name during each install, and don't forget to change the name of the entry added each time you install/update a kernel. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Multiple Linux instances on the same box - dual/triple/etc boot ?
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: >On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 13:52 -0600, kevin kempter wrote: >> I'd like to install each OS/version into it's own space on the disk. >> I'm thinking all I have to do is install one OS (say CentOS 64bit) and >> partition say 20% of the disk. Then once the install is done, boot >> into the latest fedora disk and do the same, etc. >> >> Is this correct ? > >Yes, but you should probably use a shared /boot, which means 3 things: I used to do this, but quit when systems became able to boot from places on the disk > 1024. The problem with a shared /boot is that it is very easy for poor installation/update procedures to do wierd things to render the system unbootable. I much prefer using the free VMware server for development and testing different OS versions. It's far more difficult to screw the pooch using virtual machines, and one can always make snapshots before upgrades or major changes making it easy to undo the changes and try again. I find this invaluable when testing major software installations. Bill -- INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way Voice: (206) 236-1676 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820 Fax:(206) 232-9186 Everybody is ignorant, only on different subjects. Will Rogers ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Multiple Linux instances on the same box - dual/triple/etc boot ?
I much prefer using the free VMware server for development and testing different OS versions. It's far more difficult to screw the pooch using virtual machines, and one can always make snapshots before upgrades or major changes making it easy to undo the changes and try again. I find this invaluable when testing major software installations. Yes, this seems like a case where virtualisation is a good solution. I've only just started learning to run Xen myself, but the advantages of virtualisation over dual/triple booting etc are pretty clear. As well as the ones you mention, different machines can also be run concurrently and networked. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange browser displays with 5.x on Dell GX-260
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Dick Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lanny Marcus wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 6:22 AM, William L. Maltby >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 02:47 -0400, Dick Roth wrote: This was a clean install, however I kept my /home directory intact. The rest of the partitions were reformatted. >>> >>> Try resetting all your preferences? Maybe a major format change in the >>> control files under .mozilla directories? >> >> When you launched Mozilla Firefox the first time, I suspect that it >> created a new .mozilla directory in /home and wiped out your old one. >> >> Have you tried to "yum remove firefox" and then "yum install firefox" >> to see if the issues stop or continue? >> ___ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS@centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> > > Renaming ~/.mozilla and reinstalling Firefox cured my problems. Apparently > the .mozilla file in my Home directory, which was not re-formatted, was at > odds with the new install. There was a bit of work to reclaim bookmarks, > but all appears to be well now. Thanks to Lanny and Jerry for the help. I'm very glad you cured the problem! :-) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Network issues with CentOS 5.2
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Joey Mendez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What kind of network card? what network chip, what driver is being > used? > > > Realtek 8111/8168b > module 8169 I googled and came up with this thread that might be of interest to you: http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=12467 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Update troubles for wxGTK apps
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 08:55:04PM +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote: > Akemi Yagi a écrit : > > > > >Some info here: > > > >http://planet.centos.org/ > > Thanks for the info. > > Niki but that doesn't say anything about how it is (or will be) resolved... Are we expected to remove Audacity from our systems, or what? (or drop the DAG repostiory) -- Fred Smith -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - "For him who is able to keep you from falling and to present you before his glorious presence without fault and with great joy--to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen." - Jude 1:24,25 (niv) - pgpGn4sudf63Z.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Update troubles for wxGTK apps
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 8:19 PM, fred smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 08:55:04PM +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote: >> Akemi Yagi a écrit : >> >> > >> >Some info here: >> > >> >http://planet.centos.org/ >> >> Thanks for the info. >> >> Niki > > but that doesn't say anything about how it is (or will be) resolved... > > Are we expected to remove Audacity from our systems, or what? > > (or drop the DAG repostiory) I believe what Dag is saying is that, if you wish to use audacity, you cannot update wxGTK. Conversely, if you update wxGTK, you cannot use audacity. I'm sure he will eventually resolve the issue. Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Need help with an odd issue I am experiencing
Robert Spangler wrote: On Tuesday 09 September 2008 18:53, nate wrote: Robert Spangler wrote: > And yes I have eth0 up and running. What network driver? On-board port: Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8001 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 13) Driver: sk98lin Downloading the latest driver from Marvell and compiling it did the trick. It turns out that it was a driver issue. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Need help with an odd issue I am experiencing
Les Mikesell wrote: Robert Spangler wrote: On Tuesday 09 September 2008 17:00, Scott Silva wrote: Either way, ethtool should show you detected and current link states on the connection ; That is not always the case. I cannot get ethtool to work. ~ $ /sbin/ethtool eth0 Settings for eth0: No data available And yes I have eth0 up and running. Does mii-tool work? After recompiling the latest marvell driver ethtool responds properly. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
