Re: [CentOS-virt] Need Help with Xen Please

2008-11-28 Thread Christopher G. Stach II

Brett Worth wrote:

Jason Taylor wrote:


Can anyone suggest what the next course of action would be? The server has a
single physical NIC and 1 IP. Will I need to request an additional IP
address to use with the new guest I create?


Jason,

AFAIK you will need another IP address for the VM.  This can be done either via 
DHCP or
hard wired in the configuration file.


Domain 0 can NAT for guest domains.


With some scripting you could create another
bridge device (e.g. br1) and use either Dom0 or a VM as a masquerading gateway 
device but
that is left as an exercise for the reader. :-)


... or just use vif-script vif-nat in xend-config.sxp.

--
Christopher G. Stach II

___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


Re: [CentOS-virt] Crash with qemu install: 5.2 as host and 5.2 as guest

2008-11-28 Thread Karanbir Singh

Michael Kress wrote:

As far as I gathered from different sources, RHEL 5.3 will be in Testing
Phase until begin of January. Shortly after, we could expect RHEL 5.3 to
be released and then again shortly after we could expect CentOS 5.3 to be
released in about February/March. Am I right?


We normally aim to get stuff out in a 2  3 week window, but who knows 
what might be cooking at the time!

___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


Re: [CentOS-virt] Need Help with Xen Please

2008-11-28 Thread Brett Serkez
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 3:52 AM, Jason Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Brett:

 Thank you for your help. It has been a few days since I was able to give
 this a try. However I installed Cygwin on my Windows desktop and SSH'd to
 the headless machine.  I then ran virt-install without the graphics support.
 Doing this I was able to get past where it was stuck before.

Glad that worked for you.  Just to be clear, if you use 'ssh -Y
target', you can use the graphical virt tools, I do this all the time.

Brett
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


Re: [CentOS-virt] Crash with qemu install: 5.2 as host and 5.2 as guest

2008-11-28 Thread Michael Kress
Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
 EIP: [c041041c] powernowk8_init+0x5e/0x1c2 SS:EST 0068:dfa47fa0
  0Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
   
 Looks very much alike the known bug described at
 http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2912 /
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443853 and also listed at
 the end of
 http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.2#head-447967c60eb305ef2c5dbbc3f4e8b3c4c5170632


I just tried that kernel on dom0:
http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/kernel/5/bz443853/x86_64/
(kernel-xen-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5.bz_pre53.x86_64.rpm)
but the error still persists.
What else could I do?
Michael

-- 
Michael Kress, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.michael-kress.de / http://kress.net
P E N G U I N S   A R E   C O O L

___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt


Re: [CentOS] Stop the FUD Xen is not deprecated

2008-11-28 Thread Morten Torstensen

Les Mikesell wrote:
Well, but why do you assume people run Windows where you run your 
browser? You need a Windows license to run VIC, so the price of 
installing ESXi/VIC is around $100 and up.



To someone who doesn't already have a windows license?


I wouldn't have a spare one, and even if you do have one you still paid 
for it at some point.


Now, if only IBM could implement the Power hardware Hypervisor to the 
Intel/AMD world...


--

//Morten Torstensen
//Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
//IM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I can't listen to that much Wagner. I start getting the urge to conquer 
Poland.

-- Woody Allen
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] how to connect to a switch with a serial cable? - what command(s) to use?

2008-11-28 Thread Rudi Ahlers
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 1:41 AM, Filipe Brandenburger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Use:

 screen /dev/ttyS0

 When you're done, to kill your session, press Ctrl-A then K
 (uppercase) and answer 'y'.

 HTH,
 Filipe



Thank you, Filipe. It doesn't work though. The server runs the XEN
kernel, and I think there's something I need to enable in XEN for it
to work, as XEN uses the console's of the domU's in the same way as a
serial console. So, I think I need to redirect it, somehow, but don't
know how yet.

-- 

Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow

2008-11-28 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Thomas Dukes wrote:
 Any ideas?

How many entries do you have in the arp table?

arp -a | wc -l should show you. If you really have lots of entries in
there you should try to find out the reason for that.

Ralph


pgptXMZ7Hho95.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] OT - tomcat 6 error

2008-11-28 Thread Tom Brown

Hi

I'm on 5.2 and 'have' to use tomcat 6 - I package it and can get the 
default install running fine - However when i drop my app into webapps/ 
as i war and start tomcat i get this


INFO: Starting service Catalina
Nov 28, 2008 10:44:15 AM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngine start
INFO: Starting Servlet Engine: Apache Tomcat/6.0.18
Nov 28, 2008 10:44:15 AM org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig 
deployDescriptor
WARNING: A docBase /x/xxx.war inside the host appBase has been 
specified, and will be ignored  error

Nov 28, 2008 10:44:16 AM org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol start
INFO: Starting Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-9080
Nov 28, 2008 10:44:16 AM org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina start
INFO: Server startup in 603 ms

The error is noted with the  - Has anyone used tomcat 6 before as i am 
sure this used to work just fine in  5.x ?


If this is felt to be the wrong list for this then sorry about that, but 
i am sure many people are experienced with tomcat here.


thanks

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] How to delay failed ssh auth

2008-11-28 Thread linux-crazy
Hi,

  You can create the iptables rules to block the ssh connection limit rate wise.


Create a new chain named ssh_check

/sbin/iptables -N SSH_CHECK

Redirecting all request for 22 port to new chain SSH_CHECK

/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -m state --state NEW -j SSH_CHECK

Then  allow all of your valid remote ip's that are allowed to login

/sbin/iptables -I SSH_CHECK  1 -s 1.2.3.4 -j  ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -I SSH_CHECK  2 -s 10.10.2.2 -j ACCEPT

Then for the rest of the ip it wont allow more than 4 connection
within this 60 seconds interval, its useful to prevent brute force
attack.

/sbin/iptables -A SSH_CHECK -m recent --update --seconds 60 --hitcount
4 --name SSH -j DROP

Regards.
crazy paps

On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Veiko Kukk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi!

 I need to delay failed ssh password authentication as an additional measure
 against brute force ssh attacks. I understand, that shoud be accomplished
 through pam, but googling gave me no example. I have CentOS 5.2.

 --
 Veiko Kukk
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] OT - tomcat 6 error

2008-11-28 Thread Tom Brown




WARNING: A docBase /x/xxx.war inside the host appBase has been 
specified, and will be ignored




resolved with the help of this

http://threebit.net/mail-archive/tomcat-users/msg03748.html

thanks

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] [Help] About Participate in CentOS - knoweldge sharing.

2008-11-28 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 16:15 +0800, wu yaling wrote:
 Dear friend,
 We are conducting a study on the motivation of the knowledge sharing
 on the CentOS community. 
 The contributors’ experience to Linux is very important to the design
 and management of this knowledge platform. 
 Would you please post the following on-line questionnaire message to
 the CentOS platform or forward the message to the members?
 After the survey is done, we will randomly select twenty persons and
 present them with USB 2GB Flash Drives. 
 Besides, with each valid questionnaire, we will donate US $1 dollar to
 CentOS.org. 
 The result of this survey is analyzed in an anonymous way and is only
 regarded as the academic use. 
 Please help us to complete the data collection. 

I filled it out, but to be blunt - this survey complete stinks.  Questions like:

The Linux platform can perform complex tasks using various knowledge.

What the !(*$*(!(* does that even mean?  Please don't publish, or use,
any results from this survey as they will be complete junk.

(a) The Linux platform doesn't perform complex tasks.  Users do,
applications do, maybe.  What is a complex task?
(b) using various knowledge.  Eh?  Do you mean it requires various
knowledge to set it up / configure it?  Still: Eh?  What is various
knowledge?


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Location of 5.2 .iso without XEN

2008-11-28 Thread Paul

On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 13:57 +, Ned Slider wrote:
 Tom Brown wrote:
  
  Sounds good. After I clicked send, I reread your post and realized
  that you didn't want xen (which, I believe, is depreciated). 
  
  
  what makes you think that ?
 
 Some are interpreting this:
 
 http://www.redhat.com/promo/qumranet/
 
 as an indication that xen will be dropped from RHEL6 as they direct 
 their efforts towards KVM.

I very much doubt that ... I would expect XEN to be supported in RHEL6,
now RHEL7 probably not.

Regards,
Paul




___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Stop the FUD Xen is not deprecated

2008-11-28 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote on Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:04:16 +0200:

 There are many options.

Yeah. The point behind my asking was if one would be able to run 
RHEL/CentOS 6 as a dom0 - as it is derived from Fedora and reflects the 
available bits at the time of the OS freeze. In other words, if there is a 
normal upgrade path concerning Xen from RHEL/CentOS 5 to 6 or not. So, at 
the moment it looks like you can't run RHEL 6 as a dom0, but this may 
change until it's release depending on the upstream (kernel.org?) kernel 
having the relevant xen bits in time for an RHEL release (which is 
promised for 2.6.29 or so at the moment). 
You can probably run RHEL 6 paravirtualized on a RHEL 5 dom0.
Correct interpretation so far?

Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Looking for a method to keep at least 5% CPU

2008-11-28 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Ryan J M wrote on Fri, 28 Nov 2008 08:50:39 +0800:

 PS: I think, you know, root should be loginable in any condition
 unless the system is down. Shouldn't it?

Anyxone is able to loghin anytime, if youw ant to see it that way ;-) But 
the system needs the ressources to make this happen before the timeout ;-)
It might also not be a CPU issue, but a bandwidth issue. If bandwidth is 
occupied by other users it may take a time for your packets to get thru.
In any case, you may want to lower the load for that machine or give it 
more power if you can. If you cannot login as root with ssh because it 
times out this also means that the others experience a less than optimal 
performance.

Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] [Help] About Participate in CentOS - knoweldge sharing.

2008-11-28 Thread Alexander Georgiev

 I filled it out, but to be blunt - this survey complete stinks.  Questions 
 like:

 The Linux platform can perform complex tasks using various knowledge.

 What the !(*$*(!(* does that even mean?  Please don't publish, or use,
 any results from this survey as they will be complete junk.

 (a) The Linux platform doesn't perform complex tasks.  Users do,
 applications do, maybe.  What is a complex task?
 (b) using various knowledge.  Eh?  Do you mean it requires various
 knowledge to set it up / configure it?  Still: Eh?  What is various
 knowledge?


Yet a buck is a buck.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Correct way to change I/O scheduler in a iSCSI dev

2008-11-28 Thread Santi Saez

Santi Saez escribió:

What's the correct way to change configuration parameters for an iSCSI
device? For example I/O scheduler, max_sectors_kb, etc...

I could add commands to the S99local script:

  echo noop  /sys/block/sdb/queue/scheduler
  echo 64  /sys/block/sdb/queue/max_hw_sectors_kb

Unfortunately, iSCSI device names might change from sdb to, say, sdc
(server reboot, iSCSI target reconnection). If this happens, customizations
would be lost or applied to a different device.

Any workaround for this using centOS? sysctl, udev, anything else? It also
may be applied to Fiber Channel devices.
Finally I think using udev to tune device config is the best and 
simplest way.


$ cat /etc/udev/rules.d/99-san.rules

# $Id: 99-san.rules.udev 13 2008-11-28 10:20:32Z santi $
# Set noop as I/O scheduler for iSCSI and Fiber Channel devices
ACTION==add, ENV{ID_FS_USAGE}!=filesystem, ENV{ID_PATH}==*-iscsi-*, RUN+=/bin/sh 
-c 'echo noop  /sys$DEVPATH/queue/scheduler'
ACTION==add, ENV{ID_FS_USAGE}!=filesystem, ENV{ID_PATH}==*-fc-*, RUN+=/bin/sh -c 
'echo noop  /sys$DEVPATH/queue/scheduler'

(To prevent line wrapping, udev rule it's also available at 
http://pastebin.com/f5ce875a1)

When new iSCSI or FC device is added udevd will execute $RUN command; I set 
!=filesystem condition to prevent running the command for each partition, 
executing only for block devices.

Regards,

--
Santi Saez
http://woop.es

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow

2008-11-28 Thread tdukes

 Robert Moskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 Thomas Dukes wrote:
   
 
  *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  *On Behalf Of *chloe K
  *Sent:* Thursday, November 27, 2008 9:10 PM
  *To:* CentOS mailing list
  *Subject:* Re: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow
 
  what is your netmask?  
   
  eth0 = 255.255.240.0
 
 Why do you have such a large subnet?  There are a number of potential 
 performance problems with such a setup.  I typically only see this in 
 large, bridged wireless campuses.  Little justification for it in a 
 wired network.  (I do have lots of networking experience and knowledge, 
 having consulted with a number of large deployments).
 
 Even with a large subnet, you should not be arping everywhere.  Either 
 two things are happening:
 
 Your system is recording every ARP request it sees ('Who has IP 
 x.x.x.x') to avoid arping later.  Bad behaviour (IMNSHO), given your 
 network.
 
 Your system is ARPing for every IP address in the subnet to learn all of 
 its neighbors.  WHy would it do that?  Unless you have some snooping 
 software running on your system.
 
Hi Robert,

I did not set this value.  Something did but not me.

I am on a roadrunner connection with a dynamic ip.  What do you suggest I 
change it to?

Thnaks!!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


RE: [CentOS] how to connect to a switch with a serial cable? - whatcommand(s) to use?

2008-11-28 Thread John

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rudi Ahlers
 Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 4:41 AM
 To: CentOS mailing list
 Subject: Re: [CentOS] how to connect to a switch with a 
 serial cable? - whatcommand(s) to use?
 
 On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 1:41 AM, Filipe Brandenburger
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Use:
 
  screen /dev/ttyS0
 
  When you're done, to kill your session, press Ctrl-A then K
  (uppercase) and answer 'y'.
 
  HTH,
  Filipe
 
 
 
 Thank you, Filipe. It doesn't work though. The server runs the XEN
 kernel, and I think there's something I need to enable in XEN for it
 to work, as XEN uses the console's of the domU's in the same way as a
 serial console. So, I think I need to redirect it, somehow, but don't
 know how yet.
 
Use minicom -s to configure Minicom especially the serial port tty

JohnStanley

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


RE: [CentOS] How to delay failed ssh auth

2008-11-28 Thread Gerhardus.Geldenhuis
Hi
You could install a new pam module

http://www-uxsup.csx.cam.ac.uk/~pjb1008/project/pam_delay/

Although I have not tested it.

Regards

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Veiko Kukk
 Sent: 28 November 2008 07:06
 To: centos@centos.org
 Subject: [CentOS] How to delay failed ssh auth
 
 Hi!
 
 I need to delay failed ssh password authentication as an additional
 measure against brute force ssh attacks. I understand, that shoud be
 accomplished through pam, but googling gave me no example. I have
 CentOS
 5.2.
 
 --
 Veiko Kukk
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] How to delay failed ssh auth

2008-11-28 Thread Karanbir Singh

Veiko Kukk wrote:
I need to delay failed ssh password authentication as an additional 
measure against brute force ssh attacks. I understand, that shoud be 
accomplished through pam, but googling gave me no example. I have CentOS 
5.2.


pam_sheild and pam_delay are both modules you can use for stuff like 
this, although I dont personally like either. If you get thousands of 
hits per hour, pam's internal response time gets slowed down, and its 
not insignificant unless you have exceptionally large machines.


Same thing with log watchers including denyhosts / fail2ban etc, the 
overhead isnt really worth it, at the moment switching ports to 
something else non-standard works well, needs no extra s/w etc.


- KB
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow

2008-11-28 Thread Robert Moskowitz

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Robert Moskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
  

Thomas Dukes wrote:

 

*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
*On Behalf Of *chloe K

*Sent:* Thursday, November 27, 2008 9:10 PM
*To:* CentOS mailing list
*Subject:* Re: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow

what is your netmask?  
 
eth0 = 255.255.240.0
  
Why do you have such a large subnet?  There are a number of potential 
performance problems with such a setup.  I typically only see this in 
large, bridged wireless campuses.  Little justification for it in a 
wired network.  (I do have lots of networking experience and knowledge, 
having consulted with a number of large deployments).


Even with a large subnet, you should not be arping everywhere.  Either 
two things are happening:


Your system is recording every ARP request it sees ('Who has IP 
x.x.x.x') to avoid arping later.  Bad behaviour (IMNSHO), given your 
network.


Your system is ARPing for every IP address in the subnet to learn all of 
its neighbors.  WHy would it do that?  Unless you have some snooping 
software running on your system.




Hi Robert,

I did not set this value.  Something did but not me.

I am on a roadrunner connection with a dynamic ip.  What do you suggest I 
change it to?

You might not have much control over it if you are using DHCP.

route -n

will supply you with your router address. Once you now that and your 
assigned IP address (and lease) you can use ifconfig to change your 
netmask so that your router and you are in the same subnet.


What is the address also of your nameserver (/etc/resolv.conf) and mail 
server? If these are also within that hugh subnet, your netmask has to 
keep them 'local'.


Roadrunner hmm.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow

2008-11-28 Thread Robert Moskowitz



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Robert Moskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
  

Thomas Dukes wrote:

 

*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
*On Behalf Of *chloe K

*Sent:* Thursday, November 27, 2008 9:10 PM
*To:* CentOS mailing list
*Subject:* Re: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow

what is your netmask?  
 
eth0 = 255.255.240.0
  
Why do you have such a large subnet?  There are a number of potential 
performance problems with such a setup.  I typically only see this in 
large, bridged wireless campuses.  Little justification for it in a 
wired network.  (I do have lots of networking experience and knowledge, 
having consulted with a number of large deployments).


Even with a large subnet, you should not be arping everywhere.  Either 
two things are happening:


Your system is recording every ARP request it sees ('Who has IP 
x.x.x.x') to avoid arping later.  Bad behaviour (IMNSHO), given your 
network.


Your system is ARPing for every IP address in the subnet to learn all of 
its neighbors.  WHy would it do that?  Unless you have some snooping 
software running on your system.




Hi Robert,

I did not set this value.  Something did but not me.

I am on a roadrunner connection with a dynamic ip.  What do you suggest I 
change it to?


If you restart your network services (Does RR use PPPoE?) you should 
then have an empty ARP table.


How long does it take to overflow? Can you run TCPDUMP and see if you 
are sending out the ARPs or your system is just building its table based 
on heard ARP requests?



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow

2008-11-28 Thread chloe K
you have the network /20 so that you got this neigbour overlfow
  you should subnet it
   
  

Robert Moskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Robert Moskowitz wrote: 
 
 Thomas Dukes wrote:
 
 

 *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 *On Behalf Of *chloe K
 *Sent:* Thursday, November 27, 2008 9:10 PM
 *To:* CentOS mailing list
 *Subject:* Re: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow

 what is your netmask? 
 
 eth0 = 255.255.240.0
 
 Why do you have such a large subnet? There are a number of potential 
 performance problems with such a setup. I typically only see this in 
 large, bridged wireless campuses. Little justification for it in a 
 wired network. (I do have lots of networking experience and knowledge, 
 having consulted with a number of large deployments).

 Even with a large subnet, you should not be arping everywhere. Either 
 two things are happening:

 Your system is recording every ARP request it sees ('Who has IP 
 x.x.x.x') to avoid arping later. Bad behaviour (IMNSHO), given your 
 network.

 Your system is ARPing for every IP address in the subnet to learn all of 
 its neighbors. WHy would it do that? Unless you have some snooping 
 software running on your system.

 
 Hi Robert,

 I did not set this value. Something did but not me.

 I am on a roadrunner connection with a dynamic ip. What do you suggest I 
 change it to?
You might not have much control over it if you are using DHCP.

route -n

will supply you with your router address. Once you now that and your 
assigned IP address (and lease) you can use ifconfig to change your 
netmask so that your router and you are in the same subnet.

What is the address also of your nameserver (/etc/resolv.conf) and mail 
server? If these are also within that hugh subnet, your netmask has to 
keep them 'local'.

Roadrunner hmm.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


   
 
  
-

   
Yahoo! Canada Toolbar : Search from anywhere on the web and 
bookmark your favourite sites. Download it now!  
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow

2008-11-28 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi,

On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 07:20, Thomas Dukes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 When I ran the above, I'm not sure I'm getting a correct response.  It takes
 serval miuntes then returns:
 Printk: 100 messages suppressed
 Neighbour table overflow
 Printk: 15 messages suppressed
 3

It looks like you have only 3 lines in your arp table, so it's really
hard to understand how it would overflow from that.

What does the output of arp -a look like?

You can also look at: cat /proc/net/arp

Please post the output of: sysctl -a | grep neigh

Do you have IPv6 enabled?

Filipe
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow

2008-11-28 Thread MHR
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 9:35 AM, chloe K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 you have the network /20 so that you got this neigbour overlfow
 you should subnet it


 Robert Moskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:

To EVERYONE who is top-posting on this list:

Stop it.

Thank you.

mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] isw_xxxxxxxx missing?

2008-11-28 Thread Davide Cittaro

Hi all, I've installed CentOS 5.2 on a sun x2250.
The installer goes fine and I can setup my root with lvm on /dev/ 
mapper/isw__Volume0, that is the hardware RAID1 for two disks  
available.
As the system boots lvm complains of a duplicate PV and decides to  
use /dev/sda, so the physical disk, not the raid device...  I see with  
surprise that the raid device is missing!
Needless to say, in a couple of days and reboots I've completely  
messed up the filesystem and the bootloader...

Is there a way to fix this?

d
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


RE: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow

2008-11-28 Thread Thomas Dukes
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Robert Moskowitz
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 12:20 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Robert Moskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
   
 Thomas Dukes wrote:
 
  

 *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 *On Behalf Of *chloe K
 *Sent:* Thursday, November 27, 2008 9:10 PM
 *To:* CentOS mailing list
 *Subject:* Re: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow

 what is your netmask?  
  
 eth0 = 255.255.240.0
   
 Why do you have such a large subnet?  There are a number of potential 
 performance problems with such a setup.  I typically only see this in 
 large, bridged wireless campuses.  Little justification for it in a 
 wired network.  (I do have lots of networking experience and 
 knowledge, having consulted with a number of large deployments).

 Even with a large subnet, you should not be arping everywhere.  
 Either two things are happening:

 Your system is recording every ARP request it sees ('Who has IP
 x.x.x.x') to avoid arping later.  Bad behaviour (IMNSHO), given your 
 network.

 Your system is ARPing for every IP address in the subnet to learn all 
 of its neighbors.  WHy would it do that?  Unless you have some 
 snooping software running on your system.

 
 Hi Robert,

 I did not set this value.  Something did but not me.

 I am on a roadrunner connection with a dynamic ip.  What do you suggest I
change it to?
You might not have much control over it if you are using DHCP.

route -n


Here's the output from route -n:

Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
Iface
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth1
65.188.0.0  0.0.0.0 255.255.240.0   U 0  00 eth0
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0  00 eth1
0.0.0.0 65.188.0.1  0.0.0.0 UG0  00 eth0


will supply you with your router address. Once you now that and your
assigned IP address (and lease) you can use ifconfig to change your netmask
so that your router and you are in the same subnet.

What is the address also of your nameserver (/etc/resolv.conf) and mail
server? If these are also within that hugh subnet, your netmask has to keep
them 'local'.

My nameservers are:  24.25.5.149 and 24.25.5.150

Mailservers:  75.180.132.77 and 75.180.132.33

Roadrunner hmm.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


RE: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow

2008-11-28 Thread Thomas Dukes
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Robert Moskowitz
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 12:28 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Robert Moskowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
   
 Thomas Dukes wrote:
 
  

 *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 *On Behalf Of *chloe K
 *Sent:* Thursday, November 27, 2008 9:10 PM
 *To:* CentOS mailing list
 *Subject:* Re: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow

 what is your netmask?  
  
 eth0 = 255.255.240.0
   
 Why do you have such a large subnet?  There are a number of potential 
 performance problems with such a setup.  I typically only see this in 
 large, bridged wireless campuses.  Little justification for it in a 
 wired network.  (I do have lots of networking experience and 
 knowledge, having consulted with a number of large deployments).

 Even with a large subnet, you should not be arping everywhere.  
 Either two things are happening:

 Your system is recording every ARP request it sees ('Who has IP
 x.x.x.x') to avoid arping later.  Bad behaviour (IMNSHO), given your 
 network.

 Your system is ARPing for every IP address in the subnet to learn all 
 of its neighbors.  WHy would it do that?  Unless you have some 
 snooping software running on your system.

 
 Hi Robert,

 I did not set this value.  Something did but not me.

 I am on a roadrunner connection with a dynamic ip.  What do you suggest I
change it to?

If you restart your network services (Does RR use PPPoE?) you should then
have an empty ARP table.

How long does it take to overflow? Can you run TCPDUMP and see if you are
sending out the ARPs or your system is just building its table based on
heard ARP requests?

It takes aout 5 -10 minutes before I see the messages.  I don't know you
meant by the last question.  I ran TCPDUMP and page after page after page of
stuff is scrolling.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] [Help] About Participate in CentOS - knoweldge sharing.

2008-11-28 Thread John R Pierce

Adam Tauno Williams wrote:

I filled it out...


I didn't even click on it.  the initial posting smelled far too spammy 
to me.



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] [Help] About Participate in CentOS - knoweldge sharing.

2008-11-28 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 1:57 PM, John R Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Adam Tauno Williams wrote:

 I filled it out...

 I didn't even click on it.  the initial posting smelled far too spammy to
 me.

I agree.  But some investigation has been done.  It looks legit.
Please see the Ned's note in this forum thread:

http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=17462forum=45

The spammy looks of the original post have been removed there.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow

2008-11-28 Thread John R Pierce

chloe K wrote:

you have the network /20 so that you got this neigbour overlfow
you should subnet it
 


no, no, NO. his eth1 connection is from his ISP.  He /has/ to use 
the supplied netmask, he can't reconfigure their network segment.



now, why is ARP table is overflowing is another issue entirely.

Thomas, can you try this?   Do

   arp -an | grep 65.188.0.1

and pick out the MAC address of your gateway router, this will look 
something like...


   ? (65.188.0.1) at 00:17:CB:4F:97:81 [ether] on eth1

So, the MAC address above is 00:17:CB:4F:97:81 ... yours definitely will 
be different   now,


   # tcpdump -i eth1 -n ip host 65.188.xxx.xxx and not ether host 
00:17:CB:4F:97:81


(replacing that with your gateway router's MAC address as determined 
from that ARP command, and xxx.xxx with your eth1 IP address as shown in 
`ifconfig eth1`)


this will catch all traffic between you and another IP on your ISP local 
segment thats NOT talking to the gateway router


paste 50 lines or so of the output of this here and maybe we can figure 
out whats going on.



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


RE: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow

2008-11-28 Thread Thomas Dukes
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of John R Pierce
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 5:14 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow

chloe K wrote:
 you have the network /20 so that you got this neigbour overlfow you 
 should subnet it
  

no, no, NO. his eth1 connection is from his ISP.  He /has/ to use 
the supplied netmask, he can't reconfigure their network segment.


now, why is ARP table is overflowing is another issue entirely.

Thomas, can you try this?   Do

arp -an | grep 65.188.0.1

Hi John,

The output from arp -an | grep 65.188.0.1 is:

? (65.188.0.1) at 00:1B:54:CB:7A::05



and pick out the MAC address of your gateway router, this will look
something like...

? (65.188.0.1) at 00:17:CB:4F:97:81 [ether] on eth1

So, the MAC address above is 00:17:CB:4F:97:81 ... yours definitely will 
be different   now,

# tcpdump -i eth1 -n ip host 65.188.xxx.xxx and not ether host
00:17:CB:4F:97:81

(replacing that with your gateway router's MAC address as determined from
that ARP command, and xxx.xxx with your eth1 IP address as shown in
`ifconfig eth1`)

this will catch all traffic between you and another IP on your ISP local
segment thats NOT talking to the gateway router

paste 50 lines or so of the output of this here and maybe we can figure out
whats going on.

OK, I think you lost me on that last part.  I ran tcpdump -i eth1 -n ip host
65.188.0.1 and got:

Tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on eth1, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes

0 packets captred
0 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel

Thanks!!


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Neighbour table overflow

2008-11-28 Thread John R Pierce

Thomas Dukes wrote:

# tcpdump -i eth1 -n ip host 65.188.xxx.xxx and not ether host 
00:17:CB:4F:97:81
 ...
OK, I think you lost me on that last part.  I ran tcpdump -i eth1 -n ip host
65.188.0.1 and got:
  


no, no.  I said...

# tcpdump -i eth0 -n ip host 65.188.xxx.xxx and not ether host 
xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx


thats all one line.  the first xxx.xxx would be replaced with those 
fields from your IP address not the gateway, and the latter 
xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx would be replaced with the MAC address of your ISP's 
default router, as discovered via the other command I listed.


I guess this is just too complicated to do over email...  I recommend 
you find someone local to you who is versed in network troubleshooting.



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos