[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:1028 Moderate CentOS 3 ia64 cups - security update

2008-12-15 Thread Pasi Pirhonen
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:1028

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-1028.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:

ia64:
updates/ia64/RPMS/cups-1.1.17-13.3.55.ia64.rpm
updates/ia64/RPMS/cups-devel-1.1.17-13.3.55.ia64.rpm
updates/ia64/RPMS/cups-libs-1.1.17-13.3.55.ia64.rpm


-- 
Pasi Pirhonen - u...@iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/
Top-postings silently ignored


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:1021 Moderate CentOS 3 ia64 enscript - security update

2008-12-15 Thread Pasi Pirhonen
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:1021

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-1021.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:

ia64:
updates/ia64/RPMS/enscript-1.6.1-24.7.ia64.rpm


-- 
Pasi Pirhonen - u...@iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/
Top-postings silently ignored


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:1021 Moderate CentOS 4 s390(x) enscript - security update

2008-12-15 Thread Pasi Pirhonen
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:1021

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-1021.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:

s390:
updates/s390/RPMS/enscript-1.6.1-33.c4.1.s390.rpm

s390x:
updates/s390x/RPMS/enscript-1.6.1-33.c4.1.s390x.rpm


-- 
Pasi Pirhonen - u...@iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/
Top-postings silently ignored


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:1028 Moderate CentOS 3 s390(x) cups - security update

2008-12-15 Thread Pasi Pirhonen
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:1028

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-1028.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:

s390:
updates/s390/RPMS/cups-1.1.17-13.3.55.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/cups-devel-1.1.17-13.3.55.s390.rpm
updates/s390/RPMS/cups-libs-1.1.17-13.3.55.s390.rpm

s390x:
updates/s390x/RPMS/cups-1.1.17-13.3.55.s390x.rpm
updates/s390x/RPMS/cups-devel-1.1.17-13.3.55.s390x.rpm
updates/s390x/RPMS/cups-libs-1.1.17-13.3.55.s390x.rpm


-- 
Pasi Pirhonen - u...@iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/
Top-postings silently ignored


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:1021 Moderate CentOS 3 s390(x) enscript - security update

2008-12-15 Thread Pasi Pirhonen
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:1021

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-1021.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:

s390:
updates/s390/RPMS/enscript-1.6.1-24.7.s390.rpm

s390x:
updates/s390x/RPMS/enscript-1.6.1-24.7.s390x.rpm


-- 
Pasi Pirhonen - u...@iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/
Top-postings silently ignored


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:1021 Moderate CentOS 4 ia64 enscript - security update

2008-12-15 Thread Pasi Pirhonen
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:1021

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-1021.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:

ia64:
updates/ia64/RPMS/enscript-1.6.1-33.c4.1.ia64.rpm


-- 
Pasi Pirhonen - u...@iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/
Top-postings silently ignored


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:1028 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 cups - security update

2008-12-15 Thread Tru Huynh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2008:1028

cups security update for CentOS 3 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-1028.html

The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:

i386:
updates/i386/RPMS/cups-1.1.17-13.3.55.i386.rpm
updates/i386/RPMS/cups-devel-1.1.17-13.3.55.i386.rpm
updates/i386/RPMS/cups-libs-1.1.17-13.3.55.i386.rpm

source:
updates/SRPMS/cups-1.1.17-13.3.55.src.rpm

You may update your CentOS-3 i386 installations by running the command:

yum update cups

Tru
-- 
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B


pgphUYECHCBCA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:1028 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64 cups - security update

2008-12-15 Thread Tru Huynh
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2008:1028

cups security update for CentOS 3 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-1028.html

The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:

x86_64:
updates/x86_64/RPMS/cups-1.1.17-13.3.55.x86_64.rpm
updates/x86_64/RPMS/cups-devel-1.1.17-13.3.55.x86_64.rpm
updates/x86_64/RPMS/cups-libs-1.1.17-13.3.55.i386.rpm
updates/x86_64/RPMS/cups-libs-1.1.17-13.3.55.x86_64.rpm

source:
updates/SRPMS/cups-1.1.17-13.3.55.src.rpm

You may update your CentOS-3 x86_64 installations by running the command:

yum update cups

Tru
-- 
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B


pgpPTVXPUPbzA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:1023 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 pidgin Update

2008-12-15 Thread Karanbir Singh

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:1023 Moderate

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-1023.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) 

i386:
b942e9c019cc2a1799696c90bbb30bed  finch-2.5.2-6.el5.i386.rpm
e1129c8e65226db6b824ba7a87f154d6  finch-devel-2.5.2-6.el5.i386.rpm
0f3a2c1b25ad74a7c15a953c48faa45c  libpurple-2.5.2-6.el5.i386.rpm
9d32623b265354268afe6bbca0d3032d  libpurple-devel-2.5.2-6.el5.i386.rpm
8cdd6e6e0e22d922a69bbdd512d2f3c9  libpurple-perl-2.5.2-6.el5.i386.rpm
f95d1f8cb2884a2ac6f6c0ecc11f6be6  libpurple-tcl-2.5.2-6.el5.i386.rpm
e4276244a6e6a82e3d8b096fe5ed61e3  pidgin-2.5.2-6.el5.i386.rpm
6f8a9585915a3b005bb8f12eee27bc9e  pidgin-devel-2.5.2-6.el5.i386.rpm
ce5f9f7341a92af988f88f405b15951a  pidgin-docs-2.5.2-6.el5.i386.rpm
06ecc8a1c0f9432c04e8d7709921d636  pidgin-perl-2.5.2-6.el5.i386.rpm

Source:
fda2915b4cbd72d1bd43ee5be8194e7c  pidgin-2.5.2-6.el5.src.rpm


-- 
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:1023 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 enscript Update

2008-12-15 Thread Karanbir Singh

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:1023 Moderate

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-1023.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) 

i386:
1522a047edc702fd837ddf9d4a5bdf8c  enscript-1.6.4-4.1.1.el5_2.i386.rpm

Source:
5adf9a7bcc4fc19dafa05476c9efd3ae  enscript-1.6.4-4.1.1.el5_2.src.rpm


-- 
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:1023 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 enscript Update

2008-12-15 Thread Karanbir Singh

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:1023 Moderate

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-1023.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) 

x86_64:
ef423d86e600d44671addaf1ccfa5542  enscript-1.6.4-4.1.1.el5_2.x86_64.rpm

Source:
5adf9a7bcc4fc19dafa05476c9efd3ae  enscript-1.6.4-4.1.1.el5_2.src.rpm


-- 
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:1016 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 enscript Update

2008-12-15 Thread Karanbir Singh

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:1016 Moderate

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-1016.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) 

x86_64:
ef423d86e600d44671addaf1ccfa5542  enscript-1.6.4-4.1.1.el5_2.x86_64.rpm

Source:
5adf9a7bcc4fc19dafa05476c9efd3ae  enscript-1.6.4-4.1.1.el5_2.src.rpm


-- 
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:1029 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 cups Update

2008-12-15 Thread Karanbir Singh

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:1029 Moderate

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-1029.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) 

i386:
1a05f8411e024dffdba90c7557038e73  cups-1.2.4-11.18.el5_2.3.i386.rpm
66d6f0a4a71ac0fcd793f485b030c764  cups-devel-1.2.4-11.18.el5_2.3.i386.rpm
9ff24de4eb4f7fd4ba635d1aab02f46d  cups-libs-1.2.4-11.18.el5_2.3.i386.rpm
001e848713f18c8511d1a462c7ab7119  cups-lpd-1.2.4-11.18.el5_2.3.i386.rpm

Source:
2c1ff491e7d3beda97b7f296b378  cups-1.2.4-11.18.el5_2.3.src.rpm


-- 
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:1029 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 cups Update

2008-12-15 Thread Karanbir Singh

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:1029 Moderate

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-1029.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) 

x86_64:
110edecb6fde697eae1e2544b4c5fe43  cups-1.2.4-11.18.el5_2.3.x86_64.rpm
b558bbaaadf6e3ae6951b9f2b8b5b991  cups-devel-1.2.4-11.18.el5_2.3.i386.rpm
f0ea024ef4abf36c060ed928dee46881  cups-devel-1.2.4-11.18.el5_2.3.x86_64.rpm
612df7ef5baf4a98efe30dc430e9458d  cups-libs-1.2.4-11.18.el5_2.3.i386.rpm
c71091a838d13a396ac0504acfda432e  cups-libs-1.2.4-11.18.el5_2.3.x86_64.rpm
1b47aff5050e90a2072f097f025b803f  cups-lpd-1.2.4-11.18.el5_2.3.x86_64.rpm

Source:
2c1ff491e7d3beda97b7f296b378  cups-1.2.4-11.18.el5_2.3.src.rpm


-- 
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


Re: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:1023 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 enscript Update

2008-12-15 Thread Karanbir Singh
Karanbir Singh wrote:
 CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:1023 Moderate
 
 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-1023.html
 
 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
 syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) 
 
 i386:
 1522a047edc702fd837ddf9d4a5bdf8c  enscript-1.6.4-4.1.1.el5_2.i386.rpm
 
 Source:
 5adf9a7bcc4fc19dafa05476c9efd3ae  enscript-1.6.4-4.1.1.el5_2.src.rpm
 
 

Ignore this announcement, it got sent out with the wrong CESA ID!

-- 
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


Re: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:1023 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 enscript Update

2008-12-15 Thread Karanbir Singh
Karanbir Singh wrote:
 CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:1023 Moderate
 
 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-1023.html
 
 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
 syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) 
 
 x86_64:
 ef423d86e600d44671addaf1ccfa5542  enscript-1.6.4-4.1.1.el5_2.x86_64.rpm
 
 Source:
 5adf9a7bcc4fc19dafa05476c9efd3ae  enscript-1.6.4-4.1.1.el5_2.src.rpm
 
 


Ignore this announcement, it got sent out with the wrong CESA ID!

-- 
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


[CentOS-virt] Xen Dom0 network fails to start at boot

2008-12-15 Thread Adam Huffman
I have a server running Centos 5.2 as a Xen host.  A problem that's 
shown up recently is that at boot, the dom0 interface eth0 doesn't come 
up properly, with the result that the host is only accessible via remote 
console.  If I execute 'service network restart', eth0 comes up 
normally, with an IP address and the correct routing.

Three guests have been created via virt-manager and I haven't changed 
any of the defaults, so I'm not sure what's causing this.

Here's ifconfig output after boot:

loLink encap:Local Loopback 
  inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
  inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
  UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
  RX packets:20 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:20 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
  RX bytes:1308 (1.2 KiB)  TX bytes:1308 (1.2 KiB)

peth0 Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF 
  inet6 addr: fe80::fcff::feff:/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING NOARP  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:31844 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:15 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
  RX bytes:4639017 (4.4 MiB)  TX bytes:4898 (4.7 KiB)
  Interrupt:16 Memory:da00-da012100

vif0.0Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF 
  inet6 addr: fe80::fcff::feff:/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING NOARP  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:24 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:31489 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
  RX bytes:6891 (6.7 KiB)  TX bytes:4490222 (4.2 MiB)

virbr0Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:00:00:00:00:00 
  inet addr:192.168.122.1  Bcast:192.168.122.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
  inet6 addr: fe80::200:ff:fe00:0/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:84 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
  RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:16250 (15.8 KiB)

xenbr0Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF 
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING NOARP  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:31060 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
  RX bytes:4035093 (3.8 MiB)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)

and again once I've restarted networking and have a guest running:

eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:1E:C9:CD:C7:0A 
  inet addr:10.99.91.151  Bcast:10.99.255.255  Mask:255.255.0.0
  inet6 addr: fe80::21e:c9ff:fecd:c70a/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:15836 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:10303 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
  RX bytes:2136620 (2.0 MiB)  TX bytes:33113077 (31.5 MiB)

loLink encap:Local Loopback 
  inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
  inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
  UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
  RX packets:6676 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:6676 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
  RX bytes:33006844 (31.4 MiB)  TX bytes:33006844 (31.4 MiB)

peth0 Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF 
  inet6 addr: fe80::fcff::feff:/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING NOARP  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:63781 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:27001 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
  RX bytes:9142626 (8.7 MiB)  TX bytes:34301305 (32.7 MiB)
  Interrupt:16 Memory:da00-da012100

tap0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr F2:C4:14:A0:43:50 
  inet6 addr: fe80::f0c4:14ff:fea0:4350/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:26853 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:442 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:500
  RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:25995823 (24.7 MiB)

tap1  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 96:9D:94:41:A1:C9 
  inet6 addr: fe80::949d:94ff:fe41:a1c9/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:26851 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:443 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:500
  RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:25995669 (24.7 MiB)

vif0.0Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF 
  inet6 addr: fe80::fcff::feff:/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING NOARP  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX 

[CentOS-es] Configuracion de openVPN

2008-12-15 Thread Carlos Moreira
Buenas, les comento que configurado en un CentOS 5.2, sobre una maquina 
virtual, un servidor openvpn,
el mismo tiene la ip interna 10.1.1.32 y lo nateo hacia Internet con una 
ip publica,
he conseguido poder conectarme desde la red interna al servidor pero no 
logro pinguear ninguna ip.
cuando me conecto me asigna una ip del rango 10.1.8.x, y si hago algun 
ping a la sub red 10.1.1.x me da tiempo de espera agotado, si lo hago a 
otra sub red, me da host inaccesible, lo cual es logico porque en el 
server dije que solo pueda ver la sub red 10.1.1.x.
Esta es la configuración de mi server.

port 1194
proto udp
dev tun
ca ca.crt
cert server.crt
key server.key
dh dh1024.pem
#Direcciones que se asignaran a los
#clientes, el server es .1
server 10.1.8.0 255.255.255.0

ifconfig-pool-persist ipp.txt

#Ruta para que los clientes alcancen la red local del server (56.0/24)
push route 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0

keepalive 10 120
comp-lzo
user nobody
group nobody
persist-key
persist-tun
status openvpn-status.log
verb 4


El servidor tiene una tarjeta de red sola.

Alguno tiene alguna sugerencia de como puedo hacer para poder al conectarme a 
la vpn poder ver los demas equipos de la red 10.1.1.x?? gracias


___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] Configuracion de openVPN

2008-12-15 Thread Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez
Carlos Moreira wrote:
 Buenas, les comento que configurado en un CentOS 5.2, sobre una maquina 
 virtual, un servidor openvpn,
 el mismo tiene la ip interna 10.1.1.32 y lo nateo hacia Internet con una 
 ip publica,
 he conseguido poder conectarme desde la red interna al servidor pero no 
 logro pinguear ninguna ip.
   
no le puedes pinguear ;-) bien... mientras tanto ve verificando el 
firewall, debes permitir las interfaces tun/tap, date una vueltecida por 
www.ecualug.org creo que por ahi lo expliqué una vez.

saludos!
epe

___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


[CentOS-es] problemas con impresora

2008-12-15 Thread Rosemary Solares
Hola, estoy tratando de instalar un servidor de impresoras, pero tengo
la dificultad que dentro de las impresoras disponibles en mi
distribucion (centOS 5) no existe la impresora HP Laserjet p3005, como
puedo hacer para instalar este tipo de impresora?


gracias

Rosemary
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] problemas con impresora

2008-12-15 Thread O. T. Suarez
Hola:

2008/12/15 Rosemary Solares rosemary.sola...@gmail.com:
 Hola, estoy tratando de instalar un servidor de impresoras, pero tengo
 la dificultad que dentro de las impresoras disponibles en mi
 distribucion (centOS 5) no existe la impresora HP Laserjet p3005, como
 puedo hacer para instalar este tipo de impresora?
Revisa aqui a ver si te sirve:
http://www.linuxprinting.org/show_printer.cgi?recnum=HP-LaserJet_P3005
Saludos
Osvaldo
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] Configuracion de openVPN

2008-12-15 Thread Juan Oliva
Hola , para que una maquina de la red 10.1.1.0 , sea accesible por una
cliente vpn (osea poder hacerle ping,vnc,etc.. ) , está tiene que tener como
puerta de enlace, la ip del servidor vpn en cuestión.

Espero te sirva
-- 
Saludos
Juan
Blog: http://jroliva.wordpress.com

*tildes omitidas intencionalmente


On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez 
cen...@nuestroserver.com wrote:

 Carlos Moreira wrote:
  Buenas, les comento que configurado en un CentOS 5.2, sobre una maquina
  virtual, un servidor openvpn,
  el mismo tiene la ip interna 10.1.1.32 y lo nateo hacia Internet con una
  ip publica,
  he conseguido poder conectarme desde la red interna al servidor pero no
  logro pinguear ninguna ip.
 
 no le puedes pinguear ;-) bien... mientras tanto ve verificando el
 firewall, debes permitir las interfaces tun/tap, date una vueltecida por
 www.ecualug.org creo que por ahi lo expliqué una vez.

 saludos!
 epe

 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es

___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


[CentOS-es] SMTPD AUTH

2008-12-15 Thread Yoinier Hernandez Nieves
Hola, saludos lista.

Tengo un problemita.

He implementado SMTPD AUTH pero me queda un problemita.

Si se envian correos locales, no me pide autenticacion.

Conocen como hacer que el smtpd auth me pida autenticacion a los correos 
locales,  menos que sea de una direccion especifica?

Yoinier. 

___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] SMTPD AUTH

2008-12-15 Thread Renato Covarrubias Romero
El Lunes, 15 de Diciembre de 2008, Yoinier Hernandez Nieves Hernandez 
escribió:
 Hola, saludos lista.

 Tengo un problemita.

 He implementado SMTPD AUTH pero me queda un problemita.

 Si se envian correos locales, no me pide autenticacion.

 Conocen como hacer que el smtpd auth me pida autenticacion a los correos
 locales,  menos que sea de una direccion especifica?

Creo que ese el comportamiento correcto.

¿Cómo se comunica mi servidor SMTP con el tuyo para entregarle correos que mis 
usuarios le envian a los tuyos? Creo que por SMTP... sin autenticar.
:)



-- 
Renato Covarrubias Romero   counter.li.org  #399677
rcovarru [at] alumnos.inf.utfsm.clhttp://rnt.bla.cl
Estudiante Ingenieria Civil Informatica, Casa Central, UTFSM.
Coordinador Laboratorio de Computación, Casa Central.
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] SMTPD AUTH

2008-12-15 Thread Renato Covarrubias Romero
El Lunes, 15 de Diciembre de 2008, Yoinier Hernandez Nieves Hernandez 
escribió:
 Exacto, pero solo quiero recibir los correos desde un solo servidor, que es
 mi pasarela, todos los demas quiero autenticarlo.

 Entiendes? Precisamente esa es la idea.

Ya veo...
quizás una regla de firewall?
si, es sucio, pero no se me ocurre nada más en este momento.
:P


-- 
Renato Covarrubias Romero   counter.li.org  #399677
rcovarru [at] alumnos.inf.utfsm.clhttp://rnt.bla.cl
Estudiante Ingenieria Civil Informatica, Casa Central, UTFSM.
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] SMTPD AUTH

2008-12-15 Thread Yoinier Hernandez Nieves
Gracias.

Lo que sucede es que aunque los usuarios se deseen enviar correos dentro del 
mismo dominio tengan que autenticarse, en este momento, solo autentica para 
salir del dominio.

Yoinier
- Original Message - 
From: Renato Covarrubias Romero rcova...@alumnos.inf.utfsm.cl
To: centos-es@centos.org
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 3:40 PM
Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] SMTPD AUTH


El Lunes, 15 de Diciembre de 2008, Yoinier Hernandez Nieves Hernandez
escribió:
 Exacto, pero solo quiero recibir los correos desde un solo servidor, que 
 es
 mi pasarela, todos los demas quiero autenticarlo.

 Entiendes? Precisamente esa es la idea.

Ya veo...
quizás una regla de firewall?
si, es sucio, pero no se me ocurre nada más en este momento.
:P


-- 
Renato Covarrubias Romero   counter.li.org  #399677
rcovarru [at] alumnos.inf.utfsm.clhttp://rnt.bla.cl
Estudiante Ingenieria Civil Informatica, Casa Central, UTFSM.
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es

__ Información de NOD32, revisión 3682 (20081210) __

Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system
http://www.nod32.com


___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


[CentOS] Centos4: USB disk standby?

2008-12-15 Thread Rainer Traut
Hi,

I've decided to use an external USB disk as backup with rsync.
This works fine.

When the external disk is mounted, it does not go into 
standby/sleep/whatever, though I'm using it only for 30minutes at night.

Is there a way to do this with C4, 2.6.9-78.0.8.ELsmp?
E.g. unmount/some special command/upgrade to 5.2?

Thx
Raier
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Problems compiling PostgreSQL package from FC8 on CentOS 5

2008-12-15 Thread Pintér Tibor

http://yum.pgsqlrpms.org/reporpms/repoview/pgdg-centos.html

t
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Centos4: USB disk standby?

2008-12-15 Thread Christoph Neuhaus
Hi Rainer,

 When the external disk is mounted, it does not go into
 standby/sleep/whatever, though I'm using it only for 30minutes at night.

 Is there a way to do this with C4, 2.6.9-78.0.8.ELsmp?
 E.g. unmount/some special command/upgrade to 5.2?

man sg_start (part of the sg3_utils package). For a Western Digital MyBook  
I use:
  sg_start 0 --pc=3 /dev/sda

Chris
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Problems compiling PostgreSQL package from FC8 on CentOS 5

2008-12-15 Thread Peter Hopfgartner
Dear CentOS list

we are a small software company making mostly web driven GIS software. 
We started to simplify out sysadmin life  making RPM packages of most of 
the GIS software stack. For a dependency issue we had to abandon the 
upstream 8.1 PostgreSQL and install at least a 8.2 version. Taking the 
package from Fedora 8 and rebuilding it for x86_64 went smoothly. 
Unfortunatly the same is not true for i386. It stops with:

 checking for collateindex.pl... no
checking for sgmlspl... no
checking thread safety of required library functions... no
configure: error: thread test program failed
This platform is not thread-safe.  Check the file 'config.log' for the
exact reason.

You can use the configure option --enable-thread-safety-force to force
threads to be enabled.  But you must then run the program in
src/test/thread and add locking function calls to your applications to
guarantee thread safety.
error: Bad exit status from 
/home/peter.hopfgartner/rpmbuild/tmp/rpm-tmp.77591 (%build)


RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from 
/home/peter.hopfgartner/rpmbuild/tmp/rpm-tmp.77591 (%build)


The temporary file is:

#!/bin/sh

  RPM_SOURCE_DIR=/home/peter.hopfgartner/rpmbuild/SOURCES
  RPM_BUILD_DIR=/home/peter.hopfgartner/rpmbuild/BUILD
  RPM_OPT_FLAGS=-O2 -g -march=i386 -mcpu=i686
  RPM_ARCH=i386
  RPM_OS=linux
  export RPM_SOURCE_DIR RPM_BUILD_DIR RPM_OPT_FLAGS RPM_ARCH RPM_OS
  RPM_DOC_DIR=/usr/share/doc
  export RPM_DOC_DIR
  RPM_PACKAGE_NAME=postgresql
  RPM_PACKAGE_VERSION=8.2.11
  RPM_PACKAGE_RELEASE=1
  export RPM_PACKAGE_NAME RPM_PACKAGE_VERSION RPM_PACKAGE_RELEASE
  
RPM_BUILD_ROOT=/home/peter.hopfgartner/rpmbuild/tmp/postgresql-8.2.11-1-root
  export RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 
 
  set -x
  umask 022
  cd /home/peter.hopfgartner/rpmbuild/BUILD
cd postgresql-8.2.11

CFLAGS=${CFLAGS:--O2 -g -march=i386 -mcpu=i686} ; export CFLAGS
CXXFLAGS=${CXXFLAGS:--O2 -g -march=i386 -mcpu=i686} ; export CXXFLAGS

# Strip out -ffast-math from CFLAGS
CFLAGS=`echo $CFLAGS|xargs -n 1|grep -v ffast-math|xargs -n 100`


  CFLAGS=${CFLAGS:--O2 -g -march=i386 -mcpu=i686} ; export CFLAGS ;
  CXXFLAGS=${CXXFLAGS:--O2 -g -march=i386 -mcpu=i686} ; export CXXFLAGS ;
  FFLAGS=${FFLAGS:--O2 -g -march=i386 -mcpu=i686} ; export FFLAGS ;
  ./configure --host=i686-redhat-linux-gnu --build=i686-redhat-linux-gnu \
--target=i386-redhat-linux \
--program-prefix= \
 --prefix=/usr \
--exec-prefix=/usr \
--bindir=/usr/bin \
--sbindir=/usr/sbin \
--sysconfdir=/etc \
--datadir=/usr/share \
--includedir=/usr/include \
--libdir=/usr/lib \
--libexecdir=/usr/libexec \
--localstatedir=/var \
--sharedstatedir=/usr/com \
--mandir=/usr/share/man \
--infodir=/usr/share/info --disable-rpath \
--with-perl \
--with-tcl \
--with-tclconfig=/usr/lib \
--with-python \
--with-openssl \
--with-pam \
--with-krb5 \
--enable-nls \
--enable-thread-safety \
--sysconfdir=/etc/sysconfig/pgsql \
--datadir=/usr/share/pgsql \
--with-docdir=/usr/share/doc

make  all
make  -C contrib all
make  -C contrib/xml2 all

# Have to hack makefile to put correct path into tutorial scripts
sed s|C=\`pwd\`;|C=/usr/lib/pgsql/tutorial;|  src/tutorial/Makefile  
src/tutorial/GNUmakefile
make  -C src/tutorial NO_PGXS=1 all
rm -f src/tutorial/GNUmakefile

pushd src/test/regress
make all
make MAX_CONNECTIONS=5 check
make clean
popd

pushd src/test/regress
make RPMTESTING=1 all
popd

   PYTHON=/usr/bin/python
   python_version=`${PYTHON} -c import sys; print sys.version[:3]`
   python_prefix=`${PYTHON} -c import sys; print sys.prefix`
   python_includespec=-I${python_prefix}/include/python${python_version}

   pushd PyGreSQL

   gcc $CFLAGS -fpic -shared -o _pgmodule.so ${python_includespec} 
-I../src/interfaces/libpq -I../src/include -L../src/interfaces/libpq 
-lpq pgmodule.c

   popd

   pushd Pgtcl
   # pgtcl's configure only handles one include directory :-(
   ./configure --prefix=/usr \
 --libdir=/usr/lib \
 --with-tcl=/usr/lib \
 --with-postgres-include=../src/interfaces/libpq -I../src/include \
 --with-postgres-lib=../src/interfaces/libpq
   # note: as of pgtcl 1.5.2, its makefile is not parallel-safe
   make all
   popd

exit 0

Does anybody have any hint how to proceed?

Regards,

Peter

-- 
 
Dott. Peter Hopfgartner
 
R3 GIS Srl - GmbH
Via Johann Kravogl-Str. 2
I-39012 Meran/Merano (BZ)
Email: peter.hopfgart...@r3-gis.com
Tel. : +39 0473 494949
Fax  : +39 0473 069902
www  : http://www.r3-gis.com

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] SSH login to centos

2008-12-15 Thread Gopinath Achari
Thank you all. the problem is solved. There was a reverse lookup done.

On Monday 15 December 2008 15:57, John R Pierce wrote:
 Gopinath Achari wrote:
  Hi all,
 
  SSH login to Centos 5.2 (Fresh installed) system takes a long 
  time,
  what is the problem. anyone aware of this

 I've seen that happen when reverse DNS is messed up.


 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

-- 
Regards,
Gopinath M
Network Admin
Signal Networks Pvt. Ltd.
Bangalore - 01

Smile it increases your face value

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Problems compiling PostgreSQL package from FC8 on CentOS 5

2008-12-15 Thread John R Pierce
Pintér Tibor wrote:
 http://yum.pgsqlrpms.org/reporpms/repoview/pgdg-centos.html
   

and, I might add, read the HOWTO and stuff here
http://yum.pgsqlrpms.org/howtoyum.php



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] sendmail Deferred mail - reason unknown

2008-12-15 Thread Sean Carolan
I'm a bit baffled by this problem.  Maybe there's a sendmail guru out there
who can help me out here.  We have some end-users who need to receive
system-generated mail that originates from a java-based application on our
network.  The java app sends the mail through our sendmail cluster, which
then sends the email on to the end-user over the Internet.  The size of the
emails can range from a few kb up through around 2Mb in size.

The mail logs show that these emails are typically delayed for up to 24
hours, sometimes longer.  It appears that several attempts to deliver the
email are made, with each unsuccessful one showing Deferred status in the
maillog.  After several hours of failed attempts the mail finally goes
through successfully.  Here is a typical entry (customer name redacted):

exmx1 : Dec 14 05:28:39 exmx1 sendmail[31574]: mBDIYhEa031574: to=
custo...@example.com, delay=00:00:00, xde
lay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=41874, relay=mail.example.com., dsn=4.0.0,
stat=Deferred

Unfortunately there is no reason given for the Deferred status such as
Server unavailable, etc.

Do you have any ideas how I can begin to troubleshoot this?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] sendmail Deferred mail - reason unknown

2008-12-15 Thread Sean Carolan
I'm a bit baffled by this problem.  Maybe there's a sendmail guru out
there who can help me out here.  We have some end-users who need to
receive system-generated mail that originates from a java-based
application on our network.  The java app sends the mail through our
sendmail cluster, which then sends the email on to the end-user over
the Internet.  The size of the emails can range from a few kb up
through around 2Mb in size.

I should probably add that each of these emails has an attached file,
which accounts for the large size of the emails.  Also, sorry if my
previous email was sent in HTML format, I think I might have had rich
text turned on in Gmail.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Centos4: USB disk standby?

2008-12-15 Thread Rainer Traut
Hi Christoph,

Am 15.12.2008 11:06, schrieb Christoph Neuhaus:
 Hi Rainer,

 When the external disk is mounted, it does not go into
 standby/sleep/whatever, though I'm using it only for 30minutes at night.

 Is there a way to do this with C4, 2.6.9-78.0.8.ELsmp?
 E.g. unmount/some special command/upgrade to 5.2?

 man sg_start (part of the sg3_utils package). For a Western Digital MyBook
 I use:
sg_start 0 --pc=3 /dev/sda

that's exactly what I was looking for, have the same WD drive here.

I'm not in front of the server so I can only presume by the time it 
takes to mount/access - it does only standby when the filesystem is not 
mounted?

Thx
Rainer
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] SSH login to centos

2008-12-15 Thread John R Pierce
Gopinath Achari wrote:
 Hi all,

   SSH login to Centos 5.2 (Fresh installed) system takes a long 
 time, what is 
 the problem. anyone aware of this
   


I've seen that happen when reverse DNS is messed up.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] CentOS 5 Dom0 doesn't start all DomU images

2008-12-15 Thread Devraj Mukherjee
Hello all,

I have a CentOS Dom0 booting CentOS DomU, I am able to start multiple
DomUs from the command line using xm create, but if I copy the
configuration files to /etc/xen/auto only one of the DomUs seem to
start up automatically.

Has anyone experienced anything similar before?

Any pointers / hints?

Thanks.

-- 
I never look back darling, it distracts from the now, Edna Mode (The
Incredibles)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] SSH login to centos

2008-12-15 Thread Gopinath Achari
Hi all,

SSH login to Centos 5.2 (Fresh installed) system takes a long 
time, what is 
the problem. anyone aware of this

-- 
Regards,
Gopinath M

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Centos4: USB disk standby?

2008-12-15 Thread Christoph Neuhaus
 I'm not in front of the server so I can only presume by the time it
 takes to mount/access - it does only standby when the filesystem is not
 mounted?

No, the drive goes immediately to standby mode even if the partitions are  
mounted. When you access a directory or a file the drive is brought back  
online automatically.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 46, Issue 6

2008-12-15 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. CESA-2008:1028 Moderate CentOS 3 ia64 cups -  security update
  (Pasi Pirhonen)
   2. CESA-2008:1021 Moderate CentOS 3 ia64 enscript -  security
  update (Pasi Pirhonen)
   3. CESA-2008:1021 Moderate CentOS 4 s390(x) enscript - security
  update (Pasi Pirhonen)


--

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:56:30 +0200
From: Pasi Pirhonen u...@centos.fi
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:1028 Moderate CentOS 3 ia64 cups
-   security update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20081215165630.ga13...@centos.fi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:1028

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-1028.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:

ia64:
updates/ia64/RPMS/cups-1.1.17-13.3.55.ia64.rpm
updates/ia64/RPMS/cups-devel-1.1.17-13.3.55.ia64.rpm
updates/ia64/RPMS/cups-libs-1.1.17-13.3.55.ia64.rpm


-- 
Pasi Pirhonen - u...@iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/
Top-postings silently ignored
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : 
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20081215/ff64fda0/attachment-0001.bin
 

--

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:57:26 +0200
From: Pasi Pirhonen u...@centos.fi
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:1021 Moderate CentOS 3 ia64
enscript -  security update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20081215165726.gb13...@centos.fi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:1021

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-1021.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:

ia64:
updates/ia64/RPMS/enscript-1.6.1-24.7.ia64.rpm


-- 
Pasi Pirhonen - u...@iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/
Top-postings silently ignored
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : 
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20081215/a41a56a7/attachment-0001.bin
 

--

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:59:05 +0200
From: Pasi Pirhonen u...@centos.fi
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:1021 Moderate CentOS 4 s390(x)
enscript- security update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20081215165905.gc13...@centos.fi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:1021

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-1021.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:

s390:
updates/s390/RPMS/enscript-1.6.1-33.c4.1.s390.rpm

s390x:
updates/s390x/RPMS/enscript-1.6.1-33.c4.1.s390x.rpm


-- 
Pasi Pirhonen - u...@iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/
Top-postings silently ignored
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : 
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20081215/69d4d555/attachment-0001.bin
 

--

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
centos-annou...@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 46, Issue 6
**
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] sendmail Deferred mail - reason unknown

2008-12-15 Thread Toby Bluhm
Sean Carolan wrote:
 I'm a bit baffled by this problem.  Maybe there's a sendmail guru out
 there who can help me out here.  We have some end-users who need to
 receive system-generated mail that originates from a java-based
 application on our network.  The java app sends the mail through our
 sendmail cluster, which then sends the email on to the end-user over
 the Internet.  The size of the emails can range from a few kb up
 through around 2Mb in size.
 
 I should probably add that each of these emails has an attached file,
 which accounts for the large size of the emails.  Also, sorry if my
 previous email was sent in HTML format, I think I might have had rich
 text turned on in Gmail.


just a WAG from notta guru . . .

Perhaps someone has a greylist filter running  your outbound emails 
look different enough to trigger it every time. They could whitelist you 
as a fix.


-- 
tkb
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] sendmail Deferred mail - reason unknown

2008-12-15 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Sean Carolan wrote on Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:15:15 -0600:

 Do you have any ideas how I can begin to troubleshoot this?

sendmail -v -q (will flush the mail queue, just wait and look).
First reason I would think of: greylisting.

Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] sendmail Deferred mail - reason unknown

2008-12-15 Thread jkinz
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:15:15AM -0600, Sean Carolan wrote:
 exmx1 : Dec 14 05:28:39 exmx1 sendmail[31574]: mBDIYhEa031574: to=
 custo...@example.com, delay=00:00:00, xde
 lay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=41874, relay=mail.example.com., dsn=4.0.0,
 stat=Deferred
 
 Unfortunately there is no reason given for the Deferred status such as
 Server unavailable, etc.
 
 Do you have any ideas how I can begin to troubleshoot this?

Hi Sean,
Two suggestions, 
#1 - turn your sendmail logging/debugging setting up as high as
it will go for just long enough to capture some of these events.
(then turn it back to its previous setting)

#2 - try using script and then telnet to capture an SMTP session
(Done by hand) with the MTA at the receiving end.  This can be a
little tricky and requires a good understanding of how SMTP
transactions are done so you can emulate it by hand.

I would focus on hat the receiving end does when you send it a
length that is  1 MB.

 Jeff Kinz
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS Bug Reporting Policy

2008-12-15 Thread Hywel Richards
Phil Schaffner wrote:
 Looks a lot like
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458861
 that is marked Status: RELEASE_PENDING, so one might expect a fix in 5.3.

 Added a note to the CentOS BZ and a link to CentOS to the upstream BZ.

   

Thanks Phil, that is good news indeed!

Hywel.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] sendmail Deferred mail - reason unknown

2008-12-15 Thread Sean Carolan
 #1 - turn your sendmail logging/debugging setting up as high as
 it will go for just long enough to capture some of these events.
 (then turn it back to its previous setting)

 #2 - try using script and then telnet to capture an SMTP session
 (Done by hand) with the MTA at the receiving end.  This can be a
 little tricky and requires a good understanding of how SMTP
 transactions are done so you can emulate it by hand.

Thank you all for the suggestions, I think we may have pinned down the
problem.  This list is a great resource, props to all the experienced
users who put in time answering questions here.  :)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] GNOME + Firefox - Mouse froze - what key combination to revive?

2008-12-15 Thread Phil Schaffner
Lanny Marcus wrote:
...
 Thanks for that information. It happened again, awhile ago. I was
 using Gmail online, with Firefox, as I'm now doing, and the mouse just
 became inactive. I had to kill the power again, which is a horribly
 inelegant way to get out of that.

Lanny,

Have you tried to ssh in from another system?  Sometimes that works even 
with the keyboard/mouse totally frozen.  If so you could telinit 3 / 
telinit 5 or reboot with a bit more elegance.

Phil
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS PPC architecture support

2008-12-15 Thread Stewart Williams
Karanbir Singh wrote:
 Stewart Williams wrote:
 I have a system with a PowerPC cpu which I'd like to run CentOS on in a
 production environment (albeit for a home personal server.)

 Does anyone know if the CentOS team are actually going to support PPC?
 
 yes
 
 I have found a page which states release 4 is in beta[1]. But little else.
 Is there lack of demand for support for this aging arch?
 
 somewhat. About the same level of demand there is for CentOS s390
 
 Is there a lack of volunteers?

 I'd be willing to test the releases and bug report, or help out in
 anyway I can.
 
 sounds good. What kind of a machine do you have ?

It's a Mac Mini G4 currently running Fedora.

$ cat /proc/cpuinfo

processor   : 0
cpu : 7447A, altivec supported
clock   : 1333.28MHz
revision: 0.5 (pvr 8003 0105)
bogomips: 82.94
timebase: 41600571
platform: PowerMac
model   : PowerMac10,2
machine : PowerMac10,2
motherboard : PowerMac10,2 MacRISC3 Power Macintosh
detected as : 287 (Unknown Intrepid-based)
pmac flags  : 
L2 cache: 512K unified
pmac-generation : NewWorld

AFAIK this is a 32-bit CPU.

 
 Fedora has good support, however, I don't really want to update the
 system often.

 [1] http://www.centos.org/modules/news/article.php?storyid=65
 
 You should be clear that there is no real 'ppc' support in EL at all, 
 they only support a ppc64 based cpu. However, ppc support is something 
 that I plan on getting into CentOS. Timeline ? perhaps in sync with 5.3

Ah. I did not realise that. I assumed they supported both.

As I said, I'd be glad to help in anyway I can. s390 is something I've 
always mean't to get into too, running under hercules; but never got 
round to it yet.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] sendmail Deferred mail - reason unknown

2008-12-15 Thread Bob Hoffman
 


The mail logs show that these emails are typically delayed for up to
24 hours, sometimes longer.  It appears that several attempts to deliver the
email are made, with each unsuccessful one showing Deferred status in the
maillog.  After several hours of failed attempts the mail finally goes
through successfully.  Here is a typical entry (customer name redacted):

exmx1 : Dec 14 05:28:39 exmx1 sendmail[31574]: mBDIYhEa031574:
to=custo...@example.com, delay=00:00:00, xde
lay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=41874, relay=mail.example.com.,
dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred

Unfortunately there is no reason given for the Deferred status
such as Server unavailable, etc.  

I would imagine this is a hotmail or yahoo account or something along those
lines.
Deferred does not usually mean bounced or turned into spam, it is more of a
way of making the user wait for their mail. Yahoo can hold mail for a long
time, minutes to hours, before they deliver.

If you keep resending the deferred mail, you may end up getting auto junked
though.
In my minds eye, they are just trying to get people to upgrade as then as if
by magic, mail to them does not get deferred.

But in my experience, all deferred mail is usually sent, as far as I know.
Just 'deferred' for a bit.  




___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] OT supermicro server chassis?

2008-12-15 Thread Gordon McLellan
Does anyone have a supermicro 942i server chassis?   I'm trying to
figure out if it has a true nine 5.25 drive bays, or if the one
occupied by the 3.5 caddy is special / crippled.

What I want to do is install three of the supermicro 5x3 hot swap
backplanes and I'm gunshy about buying one site unseen.

Thanks!

Gordon
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 yum check-update fails - repo change?

2008-12-15 Thread Dave Stevens
On Saturday 13 December 2008 03:32:20 am Kai Schaetzl wrote:
 Dave Stevens wrote on Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:32:51 -0800:
  #baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/5/$basearch
  mirrorlist=http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=epel-5arch=$
 basearch

 Hm, not hardcoded then. I looked again at ftp://ftp.muug.mb.ca/mirror/
 The epel mirror is to be found in the hierarchy below fedora. That's why it
 looked to be absent.
 I don't think this is a problem on your end.

you must be right. I tried it again this am and everything just works.

Thanks,

Dave

 If this problem persists, I'd contact them as there might be a problem.
 You could change to the baseurl instead for a while and then try again.
 I don't know a way to exclude certain mirrors.

 Kai



-- 
Canada must refuse to be entangled in any more wars fought to make the world 
safe for capitalism.

-- The Regina Manifesto, 1933
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] OT supermicro server chassis?

2008-12-15 Thread Monty Shinn
Gordon McLellan wrote:
 Does anyone have a supermicro 942i server chassis?   I'm trying to
 figure out if it has a true nine 5.25 drive bays, or if the one
 occupied by the 3.5 caddy is special / crippled.
 
 What I want to do is install three of the supermicro 5x3 hot swap
 backplanes and I'm gunshy about buying one site unseen.
 
 Thanks!
 
 Gordon
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Gordon,

Yes, it does have 9 bays available.  I have stuffed 4 of these chassis 
with 3 of the 5 bay hot-swappable SATA enclosures, which allows me to 
run around 11TB raid 50 (9.1TB formatted with XFS).  The 3.5 caddy 
slides out just like the spacers.

Can't be happier with the chassis/power supplies.

I have included a link below for a reference.

Good Luck.

Monty

http://www.wiredzone.com/itemdesc.asp?ic=30744293
http://www.wiredzone.com/itemdesc.asp?ic=10017099
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] sendmail Deferred mail - reason unknown

2008-12-15 Thread Scott Silva
on 12-15-2008 8:15 AM Sean Carolan spake the following:
 I'm a bit baffled by this problem.  Maybe there's a sendmail guru out
 there who can help me out here.  We have some end-users who need to
 receive system-generated mail that originates from a java-based
 application on our network.  The java app sends the mail through our
 sendmail cluster, which then sends the email on to the end-user over the
 Internet.  The size of the emails can range from a few kb up through
 around 2Mb in size. 
 
 The mail logs show that these emails are typically delayed for up to 24
 hours, sometimes longer.  It appears that several attempts to deliver
 the email are made, with each unsuccessful one showing Deferred status
 in the maillog.  After several hours of failed attempts the mail finally
 goes through successfully.  Here is a typical entry (customer name
 redacted):
 
 exmx1 : Dec 14 05:28:39 exmx1 sendmail[31574]: mBDIYhEa031574:
 to=custo...@example.com
 mailto:custo...@example.com,
 delay=00:00:00, xde
 lay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=41874, relay=mail.example.com
 http://mail.example.com., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred
 
 Unfortunately there is no reason given for the Deferred status such as
 Server unavailable, etc. 
 
 Do you have any ideas how I can begin to troubleshoot this?
 
Does the machine have good dns resolution?
Are the clocks synced to a proper time.. (IE... local time is +8 but the clock
is actually -8). GMT is OK as long as the box knows that is its timezone.





-- 
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] sendmail Deferred mail - reason unknown

2008-12-15 Thread Scott Silva
on 12-15-2008 12:01 PM Bob Hoffman spake the following:
  
 
   
   The mail logs show that these emails are typically delayed for up to
 24 hours, sometimes longer.  It appears that several attempts to deliver the
 email are made, with each unsuccessful one showing Deferred status in the
 maillog.  After several hours of failed attempts the mail finally goes
 through successfully.  Here is a typical entry (customer name redacted):
   
   exmx1 : Dec 14 05:28:39 exmx1 sendmail[31574]: mBDIYhEa031574:
 to=custo...@example.com, delay=00:00:00, xde
   lay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=41874, relay=mail.example.com.,
 dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred
   
   Unfortunately there is no reason given for the Deferred status
 such as Server unavailable, etc.  
 
 I would imagine this is a hotmail or yahoo account or something along those
 lines.
Not necessarily

 Deferred does not usually mean bounced or turned into spam, it is more of a
 way of making the user wait for their mail. Yahoo can hold mail for a long
 time, minutes to hours, before they deliver.
Any MTA can defer mail. It doesn't need to be a big bulk provider.
 
 If you keep resending the deferred mail, you may end up getting auto junked
 though.
 In my minds eye, they are just trying to get people to upgrade as then as if
 by magic, mail to them does not get deferred.
Like I said, not necessarily...

 
 But in my experience, all deferred mail is usually sent, as far as I know.
 Just 'deferred' for a bit.
Servers defer mail for many reasons. The message could exceed a size limit
that makes it wait until a certain time.

The server could be over a set load average. It will need to flush its queue
and wait until the load comes down.

It could be greylisting, but I have never seen greylisting set this high.

It could be under a DDOS attack, which makes the server stop listening for a
while.

A log entry with deferred with no other message is probably connection
related. Maybe the mail server is on a small pipe with most of the bandwitth
being used for other reasons at that moment.

There are more reasons than a conspiracy to get you to pay a subscription...





-- 
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] sendmail Deferred mail - reason unknown

2008-12-15 Thread Bob Hoffman
 
 
 There are more reasons than a conspiracy to get you to pay a 
 subscription...
 
True, but in most or almost all, it is not your sendmail or your server that
has anything to do with it. A bounce would indicate a problem or other
things...but 'defer' could mean anything. I get a lot from yahoo, both with
the stupid ID things and one server without them. They can defer for a
while.

I seldom get a defer from anywhere else, but a mailout of a large list could
get some.

But I see nothing you can do at your end if you are sending it other than
sending a letter to the deferring agent if you have the email, you know who
it is. If it is a big company like yahoo or hotmail, I would just send a
letter to the recipient and tell them about the issue so they can expect a
delay.

Anyone notice how little junk snail mail they are getting now? Or how many
snuggie blanket ads they are receiving via emailstrange world out there.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Emailing jpeg images with Evolution 2.8.0

2008-12-15 Thread Andrew Allen
I recently emailed an important jpeg image to a colleague, but when he
tried to insert it into a document it 'failed'. It appears that when
jpegs are attached to messages, they become 'corrupted' - is this a
known problem with evolution, and/or is there a way of solving the
problem?

Andy

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Any way to reduce CPU use of OpenSSH?

2008-12-15 Thread Florin Andrei
Steve Snyder wrote:
 On my CentOS v5.2 server (dual Pentium4) the OpenSSH daemon stands out 
 as being the most CPU-intensive of the

Wow, you must be sending terabytes of stuff through ssh. :-)

Assuming the request is legit:

1. Disable compression if you don't need it.

2. Try another crypto protocol. Years ago, when this problem was real 
:-) (sorry, no offense), I used to force blowfish instead of whatever 
crypto was default back then, and it produced a significant decrease of 
CPU usage on those Pentium II processors.

ssh -c blowfish-cbc hostname

I don't know which protocol is fastest nowadays, but I guess you can do 
a quick test and find out.

There might be some security implications for using a different crypto 
protocol, but you need to figure that out yourself.

-- 
Florin Andrei

http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] sendmail Deferred mail - reason unknown

2008-12-15 Thread Bob Hoffman
 


 
 It's not a big webmail provider, just a smaller company.  I 
 suspect it might have to do with the large attachments, or 
 their mail servers getting overloaded.

I really wish they would come up with a few things..

1- A real all in one really well programmed email system for linux and
windows. Something highly customizable and does
sending/receive/pop/transfer/etc without all the nightmares.
Not having a degree in all the mail programs makes it hard to not make
mistakes the more stuff you try to do.

2- As part of that, finally do away with the whole apa...@myserver thing for
web apps. Along with a nice way for php and asp to access it safely instead
of having to use smtp via some OOP thingee.

3- paid program option with id like sslmail would be awesome. Especially to
get through the junk that many big free mail companies and isps put in our
way, as well as making their life easier. Since it is ssl cert., they should
be able to come after you if you are a spammer or phisher. Also, it would
get rid of the senderID,spf, etc junk they are trying to push on us.

4- so, santa, that is what I would wish for. I know...not gonna happen.

Ever notice the bulk of spam mail is either gibberish or hawking a product
like a drug or well known name brand? Me thinks maybe that big business has
it all set up..flood with gibberish and flood with their name brand junk..
Makes it look like lots of spammers when it is probably just a few large
conglomerates.

(uh oh, they might have heard meducks)

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Emailing jpeg images with Evolution 2.8.0

2008-12-15 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Andrew Allen wrote on Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:24:52 +:

 I recently emailed an important jpeg image to a colleague, but when he
 tried to insert it into a document it 'failed'. It appears that when
 jpegs are attached to messages, they become 'corrupted' - is this a
 known problem with evolution, and/or is there a way of solving the
 problem?

I'm missing a crucial part here: verification. He received the mail and he 
inserted it. Well, there's no mention that he saved it and *looked* at 
it. How do you know that it was corrupted *before* insertion?

Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] sendmail Deferred mail - reason unknown

2008-12-15 Thread Scott Silva
on 12-15-2008 2:55 PM Bob Hoffman spake the following:
  
 
 
 It's not a big webmail provider, just a smaller company.  I 
 suspect it might have to do with the large attachments, or 
 their mail servers getting overloaded.
 
 I really wish they would come up with a few things..
 
 1- A real all in one really well programmed email system for linux and
 windows. Something highly customizable and does
 sending/receive/pop/transfer/etc without all the nightmares.
 Not having a degree in all the mail programs makes it hard to not make
 mistakes the more stuff you try to do.
 
 2- As part of that, finally do away with the whole apa...@myserver thing for
 web apps. Along with a nice way for php and asp to access it safely instead
 of having to use smtp via some OOP thingee.
 
 3- paid program option with id like sslmail would be awesome. Especially to
 get through the junk that many big free mail companies and isps put in our
 way, as well as making their life easier. Since it is ssl cert., they should
 be able to come after you if you are a spammer or phisher. Also, it would
 get rid of the senderID,spf, etc junk they are trying to push on us.
 
 4- so, santa, that is what I would wish for. I know...not gonna happen.
 
 Ever notice the bulk of spam mail is either gibberish or hawking a product
 like a drug or well known name brand? Me thinks maybe that big business has
 it all set up..flood with gibberish and flood with their name brand junk..
 Makes it look like lots of spammers when it is probably just a few large
 conglomerates.
 
 (uh oh, they might have heard meducks)

The big conglomerates spam you with TV and print ads, and junk in your postal
mail box. I would suspect most of the spam is actually fake or illegal
products or knockoffs that they couldn't legitimately sell in any traditional
retail system, or attempts to get your credit card numbers for illegal uses.

The retail police have been dispatched to your residence because of your
subversive messages. Have a nice day!!   ;-P



-- 
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Emailing jpeg images with Evolution 2.8.0

2008-12-15 Thread MHR
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Andrew Allen andy.al...@virgin.net wrote:
 I recently emailed an important jpeg image to a colleague, but when he
 tried to insert it into a document it 'failed'. It appears that when
 jpegs are attached to messages, they become 'corrupted' - is this a
 known problem with evolution, and/or is there a way of solving the
 problem?


You should try asking on the Evolution mailing list, although they're
up to 2.24.1 already and we're not going to see that in CentOS before
6.0, most likely.

http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] sendmail Deferred mail - reason unknown

2008-12-15 Thread Les Mikesell
Bob Hoffman wrote:
  
 
 
 It's not a big webmail provider, just a smaller company.  I 
 suspect it might have to do with the large attachments, or 
 their mail servers getting overloaded.
 
 I really wish they would come up with a few things..
 
 1- A real all in one really well programmed email system for linux and
 windows. Something highly customizable and does
 sending/receive/pop/transfer/etc without all the nightmares.
 Not having a degree in all the mail programs makes it hard to not make
 mistakes the more stuff you try to do.

Look at SME server from http://www.contribs.org.  Answer a few questions 
during the install, add users with a simple web form, and it works.  It 
has webmail too.

 2- As part of that, finally do away with the whole apa...@myserver thing for
 web apps. Along with a nice way for php and asp to access it safely instead
 of having to use smtp via some OOP thingee.

SME server has some of that too - and there are an assortment of 
contributed add-ins.   However the extent that it is already customized 
makes it harder to make your own local changes if you do need any.

-- 
Les Mikesell
 lesmikes...@gmail.com

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] utility to find which /dev/videoX

2008-12-15 Thread Jerry Geis
is there a utility or SOME method to
determine which /dev/videoX (like /dev/video0 or /dev/video1)
is being used by a device???

Example I have a USB camera and a USB TV module
how do I determine which device is on /dev/video0 and which is on
/dev/video1

I have seen perhaps a way in dmesg but I am looking for the
BEST way and the correct way.

Thanks,

Jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] utility to find which /dev/videoX

2008-12-15 Thread Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 19:32 -0500, Jerry Geis wrote:
 is there a utility or SOME method to
 determine which /dev/videoX (like /dev/video0 or /dev/video1)
 is being used by a device???
 
 Example I have a USB camera and a USB TV module
 how do I determine which device is on /dev/video0 and which is on
 /dev/video1
 
 I have seen perhaps a way in dmesg but I am looking for the
 BEST way and the correct way.

Look under /sys/class/video4linux.

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams ivazquez...@gmail.com

PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] kontact request

2008-12-15 Thread Gopinath Achari
Hi All, 

I am using kontact (internally uses kmail) as mail 
client. when i receive 
attachments  in mail. its displayed in smart format as default. How can i set 
inline as default. any idea on this option.

-- 
Regards,
Gopinath M

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] utility to find which /dev/videoX

2008-12-15 Thread Rob Townley
Not sure this helps b/c maybe u need a non human interactive method.

mplayer /dev/video0

lsusb -v

On 12/15/08, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams ivazquez...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 19:32 -0500, Jerry Geis wrote:
 is there a utility or SOME method to
 determine which /dev/videoX (like /dev/video0 or /dev/video1)
 is being used by a device???

 Example I have a USB camera and a USB TV module
 how do I determine which device is on /dev/video0 and which is on
 /dev/video1

 I have seen perhaps a way in dmesg but I am looking for the
 BEST way and the correct way.

 Look under /sys/class/video4linux.

 --
 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams ivazquez...@gmail.com

 PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Kerberos for squid auth

2008-12-15 Thread Joseph L. Casale
When you use kinit to acquire a Kerberos ticket prior to
joining a Win2k3 domain with net ads join -U upn is that
ticket merely used for the join that follows? When it expires
does this mean anything?

Thanks,
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos