Re: [CentOS-docs] I want to contribute to the wiki
Hi Ralph, 2009/2/16 Ralph Angenendt ra+cen...@br-online.de: moreni...@cdsl.cl wrote: Nop, I'm not subscribed to the spanish list, I didn't know that there is one (but I'm not looking for a translation, I just want to publish the document in spanish). Yeah, *I* am looking for a translation :) I can volunteer to do the Spanish - English translation, and maybe merge it with the existing content in the English section too. My WikiName is FilipeBrandenburger. Cheers, Filipe ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] I want to contribute to the wiki
moreni...@cdsl.cl wrote: Ralph Angenendt wrote: It is a wiki, not a store for links to documents on another page. Wonderful, I can paste 20 pages there, do you prefer that? Well, the way you're doing it at the moment is just fine :) Ohh shii...is not possible to keep a document with GFDL into a web site with CC? I do not know offhand (but I don't think those two are compatible). Well Ralph, anyway, If I paste the 20 pages on the wiki, I will have the problem with the licence. I want to be free to licence my documentation with GFDL or another that could be enought free for me. And put pressure for just one licence to use is not something that you could consider a free act. If you put a *HEADER* on your page which states that *this* one document is licensed under the GDFL and *NOT* under a CC license, I am *not* happy with that, but I think it could work. Anyone having a problem with that? Then, could we consider include the GFDL in the wiki (there could be a message This wiki is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License or GFDL if specified?), and I can paste the content into the wiki? No, finding a license for the wiki was hard enough - I don't really like to put that on the footer of the page. Cheers, Ralph pgpM4VHULpldZ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] I want to contribute to the wiki
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Ralph Angenendt wrote: moreni...@cdsl.cl wrote: Ralph Angenendt wrote: Ohh shii...is not possible to keep a document with GFDL into a web site with CC? I do not know offhand (but I don't think those two are compatible). Well Ralph, anyway, If I paste the 20 pages on the wiki, I will have the problem with the licence. I want to be free to licence my documentation with GFDL or another that could be enought free for me. And put pressure for just one licence to use is not something that you could consider a free act. If you put a *HEADER* on your page which states that *this* one document is licensed under the GDFL and *NOT* under a CC license, I am *not* happy with that, but I think it could work. Anyone having a problem with that? Yes, I prefer not to have content with different licenses because it may become a management nightmare at some point. Especially if content is being merged at some point or being rewritten. There is an advantage in keeping things simple. Why is the CC license not sufficient ? Why does the author not want to dual-license or relicense his content ? -- -- dag wieers, d...@centos.org, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors] ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] I want to contribute to the wiki
Ralph Angenendt wrote: moreni...@cdsl.cl wrote: Ralph Angenendt wrote: It is a wiki, not a store for links to documents on another page. Wonderful, I can paste 20 pages there, do you prefer that? Well, the way you're doing it at the moment is just fine :) Ok, I'm putting there a resume, without images and the large outputs and the licence (the resume will be under CC, according to the wiki). Also, I have included an url pointing to the complete manual. [...] -- Morenisco. Centro de Difusión del Software Libre. http://www.cdsl.cl http://santiago.flisol.cl Blog: http://morenisco.belvil.eu ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] I want to contribute to the wiki
Dag Wieers wrote: On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Ralph Angenendt wrote: [...] If you put a *HEADER* on your page which states that *this* one document is licensed under the GDFL and *NOT* under a CC license, I am *not* happy with that, but I think it could work. Anyone having a problem with that? Yes, I prefer not to have content with different licenses because it may become a management nightmare at some point. Especially if content is being merged at some point or being rewritten. There is an advantage in keeping things simple. Why is the CC license not sufficient ? Why does the author not want to dual-license or relicense his content ? Because I prefer GFDL. I prefer and I want give all the rights over the document, instead start providing some rights. I feel more confortable and overall free with GFDL. Anyway, I'm not sure to publish more documents in the CentOS wiki, this is not being a good experience for me. Is difficult to publish documentation here. And after have explained what and where I want to contribute, I was almost forced to re-licence or change the licence of my documentation (and you didn't think that someone could want to keep his freedom and publish his documentation with the original licence that he choose?). Bye. -- Morenisco. Centro de Difusión del Software Libre. http://www.cdsl.cl http://santiago.flisol.cl Blog: http://morenisco.belvil.eu ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] I want to contribute to the wiki
On 17/02/2009, moreni...@cdsl.cl moreni...@cdsl.cl wrote: Dag Wieers wrote: On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Ralph Angenendt wrote: [...] If you put a *HEADER* on your page which states that *this* one document is licensed under the GDFL and *NOT* under a CC license, I am *not* happy with that, but I think it could work. Anyone having a problem with that? Yes, I prefer not to have content with different licenses because it may become a management nightmare at some point. Especially if content is being merged at some point or being rewritten. There is an advantage in keeping things simple. Why is the CC license not sufficient ? Why does the author not want to dual-license or relicense his content ? Because I prefer GFDL. I prefer and I want give all the rights over the document, instead start providing some rights. I feel more confortable and overall free with GFDL. Anyway, I'm not sure to publish more documents in the CentOS wiki, this is not being a good experience for me. Is difficult to publish documentation here. And after have explained what and where I want to contribute, I was almost forced to re-licence or change the licence of my documentation (and you didn't think that someone could want to keep his freedom and publish his documentation with the original licence that he choose?). The rules apply to everyone. Why should *you* be an exception? If the clearly defined rules are not adhered to, or enforced, then anarchy prevails. I am sorry to hear that you have misunderstood the purpose of the CentOS Wiki. It does not exist to provide a means for persons to publish their own copyrighted material for global access via the Internet but to provide information, advice, hints, etc, to users of CentOS. Alan ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] I want to contribute to the wiki
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, moreni...@cdsl.cl wrote: Dag Wieers wrote: On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Ralph Angenendt wrote: [...] If you put a *HEADER* on your page which states that *this* one document is licensed under the GDFL and *NOT* under a CC license, I am *not* happy with that, but I think it could work. Anyone having a problem with that? Yes, I prefer not to have content with different licenses because it may become a management nightmare at some point. Especially if content is being merged at some point or being rewritten. There is an advantage in keeping things simple. Why is the CC license not sufficient ? Why does the author not want to dual-license or relicense his content ? Because I prefer GFDL. I prefer and I want give all the rights over the document, instead start providing some rights. I feel more confortable and overall free with GFDL. You have that right. Anyway, I'm not sure to publish more documents in the CentOS wiki, this is not being a good experience for me. Is difficult to publish documentation here. And after have explained what and where I want to contribute, I was almost forced to re-licence or change the licence of my documentation (and you didn't think that someone could want to keep his freedom and publish his documentation with the original licence that he choose?). Bye. Why do you feel turned down when one person in a community expresses his opinion ? Ralph asked what people thought, I gave my opinion. You are free to feel hurt by what I said, but this was not specifically targeted at you, you are simply the first person to raise the problem and as such we need to discuss it in general. Bye. -- -- dag wieers, d...@centos.org, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors] ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] [CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ?
Hi, On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:05, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:44, Alain Terriault ala...@music.mcgill.ca wrote: I am runing x86_64 versions of kernel-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.centos.plus ( i need XFS) You no longer need CentOS Plus kernel for XFS. See: http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/CentOSPlus#line-76 And even this info is becoming obsolete. The current kmod-xfs package (in CentOS-5) is kABI-tracking, that is, it is independent of the kernel version. Time for an update then! I suggest creating a new HowTos/XFS page with instructions on how to use XFS. I volunteer to write the current instructions on how to use it (on either the regular or the plus kernel). Then modify the page on CentOSPlus to point to that one (since now XFS has *nothing* to do with CentOSPlus anymore), with something like Example 3: We want to use the XFS file system. See [here] for instructions. Do you like this idea? My WikiName is FilipeBrandenburger. Thanks, Filipe ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] [CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ?
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Filipe Brandenburger filbran...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:05, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:44, Alain Terriault ala...@music.mcgill.ca wrote: I am runing x86_64 versions of kernel-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.centos.plus ( i need XFS) You no longer need CentOS Plus kernel for XFS. See: http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/CentOSPlus#line-76 And even this info is becoming obsolete. The current kmod-xfs package (in CentOS-5) is kABI-tracking, that is, it is independent of the kernel version. Time for an update then! I suggest creating a new HowTos/XFS page with instructions on how to use XFS. I volunteer to write the current instructions on how to use it (on either the regular or the plus kernel). Then modify the page on CentOSPlus to point to that one (since now XFS has *nothing* to do with CentOSPlus anymore), with something like Example 3: We want to use the XFS file system. See [here] for instructions. Do you like this idea? *I* do. Looks like you already have the wiki-wide edit rights, so why not? Akemi ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] [CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ?
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Filipe Brandenburger And even this info is becoming obsolete. The current kmod-xfs package (in CentOS-5) is kABI-tracking, that is, it is independent of the kernel version. I suggest creating a new HowTos/XFS page with instructions on how to use XFS. I volunteer to write the current instructions on how to use it (on either the regular or the plus kernel). Then modify the page on CentOSPlus to point to that one (since now XFS has *nothing* to do with CentOSPlus anymore), with something like Example 3: We want to use the XFS file system. See [here] for instructions. Do you like this idea? *I* do. Looks like you already have the wiki-wide edit rights, so why not? Also, I started working on creating a kABI-tracking kmod-xfs package for CentOS-4 sometime ago but had to put it on hold because of other things that need more attention. So, please be sure to mention that CentOS-4 users need to update kmod-xfs for every kernel update. Akemi ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] [CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ?
The subject line for this conversation / thread reads: Re: [CentOS-docs] [CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ? The contents, however, relates to XFS the CentOSPlus kernel. Filipe, please take care with what you do. :-) Alan. ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-docs] Update XFS Documentation (was: Re: [CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ?)
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:33, Alan Bartlett ajb.st...@googlemail.com wrote: The subject line for this conversation / thread reads: Re: [CentOS-docs] [CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ? The contents, however, relates to XFS the CentOSPlus kernel. Filipe, please take care with what you do. :-) Very sorry about that. Fixed it now. In reply to Akemi's e-mails, I was not aware that I had wiki-wide edit rights, but I'm glad that I do. Be sure that I will behave! :-) I will write a draft about installing/using XFS on CentOS and send it to this list for review. I'll make sure I mention the procedure for CentOS-4 that will still be different than the one for CentOS-5 for now. When everyone is happy with the XFS page, then I will go on and modify the one on CentOSPlus to include a link to the XFS page on the place where it talks about that. Thanks, Filipe ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Update XFS Documentation (was: Re: [CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ?)
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Filipe Brandenburger filbran...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:33, Alan Bartlett ajb.st...@googlemail.com wrote: The subject line for this conversation / thread reads: Re: [CentOS-docs] [CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ? The contents, however, relates to XFS the CentOSPlus kernel. Filipe, please take care with what you do. :-) Very sorry about that. Fixed it now. Seen the smiley in Alan's note? Here is mine :-D In reply to Akemi's e-mails, I was not aware that I had wiki-wide edit rights, but I'm glad that I do. Be sure that I will behave! :-) Because that happened about two hours ago (hope this was not supposed to be kept secret). Ralph? I will write a draft about installing/using XFS on CentOS and send it to this list for review. I'll make sure I mention the procedure for CentOS-4 that will still be different than the one for CentOS-5 for now. When everyone is happy with the XFS page, then I will go on and modify the one on CentOSPlus to include a link to the XFS page on the place where it talks about that. Very much looking forward to seeing it. Akemi ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Update XFS Documentation (was: Re: [CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ?)
On 17/02/2009, Filipe Brandenburger filbran...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:33, Alan Bartlett ajb.st...@googlemail.com wrote: The subject line for this conversation / thread reads: Re: [CentOS-docs] [CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ? The contents, however, relates to XFS the CentOSPlus kernel. Filipe, please take care with what you do. :-) Very sorry about that. Fixed it now. Excellent. Thanks. In reply to Akemi's e-mails, I was not aware that I had wiki-wide edit rights, but I'm glad that I do. Be sure that I will behave! :-) You had better, as toracat has super-sharp claws. ;-) Alan. ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-docs] I want to contribute to the wiki
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Ralph Angenendt wrote: moreni...@cdsl.cl wrote: Well Ralph, anyway, If I paste the 20 pages on the wiki, I will have the problem with the licence. I want to be free to licence my documentation with GFDL or another that could be enought free for me. And put pressure for just one licence to use is not something that you could consider a free act. If you put a *HEADER* on your page which states that *this* one document is licensed under the GDFL and *NOT* under a CC license, I am *not* happy with that, but I think it could work. Anyone having a problem with that? well, actually, yes, I do I want a pony, but CentOS is not going to provide me with one, it seems. Beer seems to still require that I pay for it at the local corner saloon. The first poster is conflating fiscally free, and software Libre concepts. So far as I can tell, there is an functionally infinitely large webspace for published content, and Google can be induced to index it with minimal attention to detail. If it resides in ** CentOS provided ** namespace, I _do_ expect it to be licensed generally, and not full of local exceptions (which impair reproduceability, as in a 'best of' volume), and are subject to unfixable entropy as a 'consent' for a change cannot be found when the original author has evaporated. Why buy potential a copyright squabble HERE if we don't need to? The header/footer addendum on the doco we re-publish under such limitations from upstream are U_G_L_Y, but such local carveouts seem to provoke such a response to 'be careful'. The CentOS trademark is ours, the copyright is of the project, and admixing the copyrights of others is a recipe for unclarity and trouble. Also, we have the problem of orphaned pages already [and I correct or kill them when seen] and there is NO good reason I can see, from a CentOS point of view, to compound the matter with local copyright carveouts. I would rather do without yet another redundant article, that carries such thorns. -- Russ herrold ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-docs] I want to contribute to the wiki
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, moreni...@cdsl.cl wrote: here. And after have explained what and where I want to contribute, I was almost forced to re-licence or change the licence of my documentation (and you didn't think that someone could want to keep his freedom and publish his documentation with the original licence that he choose?). false dichotomy here .. nothing about freedom of speach requires furnishing a press, paper, ink, editorial, and a circulation department to all comers. -- Russ herrold ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] [CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ?
Filipe Brandenburger wrote: I suggest creating a new HowTos/XFS page with instructions on how to use XFS. I volunteer to write the current instructions on how to use it (on either the regular or the plus kernel). Then modify the page on CentOSPlus to point to that one (since now XFS has *nothing* to do with CentOSPlus anymore), with something like Example 3: We want to use the XFS file system. See [here] for instructions. Sure, go ahead. Do you like this idea? My WikiName is FilipeBrandenburger. You have edit rights, just create needed pages yourself. Cheers, Ralph pgpHZiFkJD2KM.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-es] problema de acceso al equipo
Hola, Tengo un servidor web con Centos5 y Apache, el cual funcionaba correctamente. Hoy he instalado el soft Otrs, y además de que no me funciona, tampoco tengo acceso al servidor. No se si puede ser que el puerto 443 (conexión segura) esté cerrado. Si es así, ¿comos e abre este puerto? ¿alguien sabe si la instalación de Otrs ha podido afectar? gracias Ramón Cervantes Consultor Móvil 657 86 35 46 mailto:rcervan...@sinergium-sgh.com rcervan...@sinergium-sgh.com http://www.sinergium-sgh.com/ www.sinergium-sgh.com P Antes de imprimir este mensaje, por favor, compruebe que es verdaderamente necesario. El Medio Ambiente es cosa de todos. Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. image001.jpg___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] problema de acceso al equipo
Hola: Hoy he instalado el soft Otrs, y además de que no me funciona, tampoco tengo acceso al servidor. Te refieres al acceso al servidor como host = por ssh o al servidor de paginas web = el apache. No se si puede ser que el puerto 443 (conexión segura) esté cerrado. Si es así, ¿comos e abre este puerto? Ese puerto lo abre el apache (o el webserver que tengas instalado). ¿alguien sabe si la instalación de Otrs ha podido afectar? No es lo habitual, pero si pudiera estar en conflicto con alguna configuracion previa. Revisa las trazas del apache: tail -f /var/log/httpd/*log Reinicia el apache y revisa los logs por mensajes de error. Recuerda que el ssl no te permite tener varios virtualhost como puedes por http normal, solo uno, es posible que el otrs haya instalado una configuracion de un virtualhost que entre en conflicto con otra que ya existiera. Revisa que tu apache tuviera el ssl funcionando y bien configurado para evitar que el problema fuera anterior al otrs. Adjunta los pedazos de trazas que consideres necesarios en el correo y explica con el mayor lujo de detalles el problema en especifico que estas teniendo. Igual en un inicio no te compliques con el ssl, prueba que funciona por http primero y luego que funcione por https. Saludos Osvaldo ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] problema de acceso al equipo
Gracias Voy avanzando: - lo que no consigo es acceso al servidor de páginas web (apache) - el puerto 443 está escuchando (abierto) Voy a probar lo que me dices en tu correo Ramón Cervantes Consultor Móvil 657 86 35 46 rcervan...@sinergium-sgh.com www.sinergium-sgh.com P Antes de imprimir este mensaje, por favor, compruebe que es verdaderamente necesario. El Medio Ambiente es cosa de todos. Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. -Mensaje original- De: centos-es-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-es-boun...@centos.org] En nombre de O. T. Suarez Enviado el: martes, 17 de febrero de 2009 12:56 Para: centos-es@centos.org Asunto: Re: [CentOS-es] problema de acceso al equipo Hola: Hoy he instalado el soft Otrs, y además de que no me funciona, tampoco tengo acceso al servidor. Te refieres al acceso al servidor como host = por ssh o al servidor de paginas web = el apache. No se si puede ser que el puerto 443 (conexión segura) esté cerrado. Si es así, ¿comos e abre este puerto? Ese puerto lo abre el apache (o el webserver que tengas instalado). ¿alguien sabe si la instalación de Otrs ha podido afectar? No es lo habitual, pero si pudiera estar en conflicto con alguna configuracion previa. Revisa las trazas del apache: tail -f /var/log/httpd/*log Reinicia el apache y revisa los logs por mensajes de error. Recuerda que el ssl no te permite tener varios virtualhost como puedes por http normal, solo uno, es posible que el otrs haya instalado una configuracion de un virtualhost que entre en conflicto con otra que ya existiera. Revisa que tu apache tuviera el ssl funcionando y bien configurado para evitar que el problema fuera anterior al otrs. Adjunta los pedazos de trazas que consideres necesarios en el correo y explica con el mayor lujo de detalles el problema en especifico que estas teniendo. Igual en un inicio no te compliques con el ssl, prueba que funciona por http primero y luego que funcione por https. Saludos Osvaldo ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] problema de acceso al equipo
Hola: Voy avanzando: - lo que no consigo es acceso al servidor de páginas web (apache) - el puerto 443 está escuchando (abierto) Algunas sugerencias: 1. revisa que el puerto este escuchando: netstat -nat | grep LISTEN 2. revisa que no tengas alguna regla del iptables activa (iptables -nL) que te bloquee el acceso (ha sucedido ;) Es raro que el puerto 443 este escuchando pero no tengas acceso al apache. Otra cosa, puedes comprobar que aplicacion esta escuchando en un puerto determinado con este comando: fuser -vn tcp 443 (y lo mismo para el puerto 80). Reinicia el apache y mira en las trazas si encuentras algun mensaje de error. Saludos Osvaldo ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] problema de acceso al equipo
Hola de nuevo. Perdón por la consulta, y gracias por la respuesta. Finalmente ha resultados er unicamente un problema de conexión del cable. Muchas gracias por tu esfuerzo en als respuestas. saludos Ramón Cervantes Consultor Móvil 657 86 35 46 rcervan...@sinergium-sgh.com www.sinergium-sgh.com P Antes de imprimir este mensaje, por favor, compruebe que es verdaderamente necesario. El Medio Ambiente es cosa de todos. Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. -Mensaje original- De: centos-es-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-es-boun...@centos.org] En nombre de O. T. Suarez Enviado el: martes, 17 de febrero de 2009 13:28 Para: centos-es@centos.org Asunto: Re: [CentOS-es] problema de acceso al equipo Hola: Voy avanzando: - lo que no consigo es acceso al servidor de páginas web (apache) - el puerto 443 está escuchando (abierto) Algunas sugerencias: 1. revisa que el puerto este escuchando: netstat -nat | grep LISTEN 2. revisa que no tengas alguna regla del iptables activa (iptables -nL) que te bloquee el acceso (ha sucedido ;) Es raro que el puerto 443 este escuchando pero no tengas acceso al apache. Otra cosa, puedes comprobar que aplicacion esta escuchando en un puerto determinado con este comando: fuser -vn tcp 443 (y lo mismo para el puerto 80). Reinicia el apache y mira en las trazas si encuentras algun mensaje de error. Saludos Osvaldo ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] Adjuntos no llegan - Postfix
Que tal lista, actualmente tengo un server postfix con dovecot + Amavis, pero estoy viendo que algunos adjuntos no estan llegando, que configuracion debo realizar en Amavis, tengo que realizar para poder evitar este problema. Esto es lo que muestra el log Feb 11 07:22:16 MY_Server amavis[28326]: (28326-19) Passed BAD-HEADER, [212.x.y.z] usua...@que_envia destinatar...@my_server.com,destinatar...@my_server.com, quarantine: j/badh-jgXGjOBnIQQZ, Message-ID: ofc7bff8cd.357cde28-onc125755a.00458417-c125755a.0045b...@bbraun.com, mail_id: jgXGjOBnIQQZ, Hits: -, size: 2337, queued_as: DF0C8C64052, 274 ms -- Anthony Mogrovejo cel 9-91681659 Consultor Junior IT Documents Project Fedora Linux User # 433253 Ubuntu User # 9562 - Quisiera cambiar al mundo pero no me dan los RPM... ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Carpetas con permisos usando samba
La verdad es que sigo rompiendome la cabeza, ya que si bien es cierto la conf. funciona pero mi idea es que los usuarios en mencion, solo tengan ciertos accesos(escritura-lectura-ejecucion) a ciertas carpetas Alguna sugerencia lista ? El 16 de febrero de 2009 19:23, Anthony Mogrovejo tony001...@gmail.comescribió: creo que puede funcionar, voy a probarlo y te comento El 16 de febrero de 2009 16:01, Manolo maa...@ono.com escribió: Anthony Mogrovejo escribió: Que tal Manolo, tambien probe eso, pero no me funciona Resumo lo que quiero, tengo una carpeta general, la cual contiene 3 sub-carpetas, tengo 4 usuarios, los cuales acceden a estas sub-carpetas bajo ciertos permisos(rxw, r, w), dependiendo del usuario. Este es mi configuracion para una determinada carpeta: [DOC1] comment = Calidad_DOC path = /var/DOCUMENTOS/Calidad public = yes writable = yes Read Only = Yes Browseable = Yes valid users = LAB06, PC042, Sistemas, desarrollo Read List = LAB06, PC042, Sistemas, desarrollo Write list = LAB06, PC042, Sistemas, desarrollo force create mode = 0777 force directory mode = 077 force user = LAB06, PC042, Sistemas 2009/2/16 Manolo maa...@ono.com mailto:maa...@ono.com Anthony Mogrovejo escribió: Que tal lista, tengo la siguiente consulta: quiero crear el siguiente esquema usando samba: la carpeta DOCUMENTOS, dentro de ella tiene 3 carpetas: DOC1,DOC2,DOC3. Tengo los usuarios: Fred,Carla, Tony y Paco, los cuales accesaran a las carpetas bajo este esquema: DOC1: Carla-Tony (RXW), Fred (R). DOC2: Fred-Paco-Tony(RXW),Carla(WX) DOC3: Carla-Fred(RWX), Tony(R) Me gustaria saber que configuracion debo de usar en samba para poder construir el esquema de permisos que les planteo en este email. De momento pense usar FORCE USER, ADMIN USERS, pero no me funciona, ya que cada vez que lo hago, me sale el login para colocar el passwd del usuario invitado P.D tengo el parametro security=share Gracias por la ayuda brindada -- Anthony Mogrovejo cel 9-91681659 Consultor Junior IT Documents Project Fedora Linux User # 433253 Ubuntu User # 9562 - Quisiera cambiar al mundo pero no me dan los RPM... ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org mailto:CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es No se si te he entendido bien. Puedes adjuntar el fichero de configuración? Prueba con: [DOC1_L] comment = DOC1 Lectura read only = yes valid users = fred [DOC1_E] comment = DOC1 Escritura read only = no valid users = carla, tony Vamos creando un recurso para lectura y otro para escritura de cada directorio total 6. Saludos. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org mailto:CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Anthony Mogrovejo cel 9-91681659 Consultor Junior IT Documents Project Fedora Linux User # 433253 Ubuntu User # 9562 - Quisiera cambiar al mundo pero no me dan los RPM... ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es Creo que esto es lo que buscas (Cambiando Guest ok y añadiendo para acotar más Read list) Vamos lo que tienes pero quitando writable En el siguiente ejemplo se compartirá a través de Samba el recurso denominado *ftp*, el cual está localizado en el directorio */var/ftp/pub* del disco duro. Se permitirá el acceso a cualquiera pero será un recurso de solo lectura salvo para los usuarios administrador y fulano. Todo directorio nuevo que sea creado en su interior tendrá permiso 755 y todo fichero que sea puesto en su interior tendrá permiso 644. [ftp] comment = Directorio del servidor FTP path = /var/ftp/pub guest ok = Yes *read only = Yes write list = fulano, administrador* directory mask = 0755 create mask = 0644 Link: http://www.linuxparatodos.net/portal/staticpages/index.php?page=13-como-samba ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Anthony Mogrovejo cel 9-91681659 Consultor Junior IT Documents Project Fedora
[CentOS-es] bloquear messenger
El problema que tengo es el siguiente: tengo instalado un servidor dhcp en Centos 4.7 y el squid todo trabaja bien el problema que en la institución donde laboro me an pedido restringir el messenger a ciertas Pcs he probado de todo y nada, ha la version de messenger de mis Pcs clientes es la 8.1 atte: MISAEL CERRON ACHAHUANCO ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] bloquear messenger
cheka las opciones del firewall bloquea el puerto que usa para comunicarse .. -- Una alegría compartida se transforma en doble alegría; una pena compartida, en media pena. http://alexove.blogspot.com/ http://cj-ubunteando.blogspot.com www.cuscolibreweb.org http://groups.google.com.pe/group/mosoq_kallpa ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] comienzos en centos
holas soy nuevo en esto del linux y me interesaria usa centos, ya que me han hablado muy bien de el.. especificamente necesito montar un proxy de cara a inet para una red... espero consejos!!! gracias sl2 ernesto ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] interactuar con una sesion c3270
Saludos Lista. Despues de buscar y googlear, no consigo encontrar la información que necesito para poder utilizar c3270 o x3270-script. Seguramente la tengo delante de mis ojos, pero no consigo entenderlo. Os comento la situacion que tenemos en la oficina, ahora mismo necesitamos interactuar con una sesion a un 3270, estaa interactuacion a fin de automatizar procesos la realizamos con visual basic, utilizando esta conexion como objeto y con el sendkeys y otros comandos de lectura para poderlo realizar. Realmente este sistema ya esta mas que probado y funciona perfectamente. Pero quiero, queremos ir un paso más alla. La idea seria la de realizar una serie de servicios para que interactuasen con un c3270 o x3270-script en un servidor debian en forma de procesos cron, preparando procesos para que leyeran de una base de datos por donde le pasamos los datos. He visto que hay algo hecho en perl, pero la conexion ha realizar por perl a un sqlserver que es donde tenemos los datos lo lograriamos a traves de un odbc, cosa que no me convence, a parte que mis conocimientos de perl son muy básicos y no me veo entrando a saco. La idea seria bien realizar una interactuacion con c3270 o w3270-script , bien a traves de bash o a traves de php,( que si domino algo mas, no mucho mas). De todas formas necesitaria una orientacion de como a traves de consola pasar datos a una sesion c3270, a traves de comandos serializados, (digo yo). y obtener una salida de los datos que van saliendo por la pantalla o bien de los comandos necesarios a traves de los cuales pueda controlar la situacion de la sesion. bueno no se si me explicado bien, de todas formas cualquier tipo de ayuda para poder solventar este problema será bien recibida. gracias a todos y felicidades por la lista ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] comienzos en centos
On Martes 17 Febrero 2009 12:04:12 Ernesto Infante Licea escribió: holas soy nuevo en esto del linux y me interesaria usa centos, ya que me han hablado muy bien de el.. especificamente necesito montar un proxy de cara a inet para una red... ¿Googleaste? Tienes un enfoque incorrecto. La pregunta correcta ser´ia: - He buscado en google y encontr´e opcion1, opcion2 y opcion3... ¿cu´al me recomiendan? - Tengo problemas con opcion1, no me funciona XXX y los logs me dicen esto (pegar log aqu´i). Nunca es malo mostrar algo de esfuerzo, porque si una empresa me pregunta eso, yo les pasar´e una boleta/factura por ello. :) Saludos... PD: Prueba con squid. -- Renato Covarrubias Romero counter.li.org #399677 rcovarru [at] alumnos.inf.utfsm.clhttp://rnt.bla.cl Estudiante Ingenieria Civil Informatica, Casa Central, UTFSM. Coordinador Laboratorio de Computación, Casa Central. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Configuración de Sendmail
Francisco Collao Gárate escribió:
Manolo wrote:
Francisco Collao Gárate escribió:
Manolo wrote:
Hola, estoy intentando configurar el smtp de sendmail, para poder lanzar
correos desde una maquina con centos4.
He editado /etc/mail/sendmail.cf y he añadido, DSsmtp.ono.com
Pero al enviar los mails con:
Trata de enviar un mail asi:
# mail -v -s test a...@tudominio.com
bla bla
bla bla
.
Y ve el log que genera al enviar.
Me huele a que no tienes definido el nombre(s) de la maquina en el
local-host-names de sendmail (/etc/local-host-names).
Si el problema es de permisos deberias revisar el access y que tu nombre
de maquina y dominio tengan relay.
PD: para la otra manda el log de sendmail para ver la causa del rechazo,
es mas facil decir que es lo que pasa.
Salu2 y suerte
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Hola, lo primero gracias por la aportacion.[r...@legolas ~]# cat
/etc/mail/local-host-names
He provado lo que comentas y nada.
Adjunto lo que comentas a ver si orientamos esto:
*# local-host-names - include all aliases for your machine here.
ono.com
*La salida del test es la siguiente:
NOTA: El proceso que realizo es el siguiente:
Entro en mi mauqina local con usuario celtha me logo por ssh como
celtha en el servidor, escalo a root y lanzo el mail.
Pero he visto que la cuenta que aparece en el log es cel...@. No
entiendo porque
Por lo que se ve en la conversacion del STMP deberias tener en tu
local-hosts-names es:
localhost.localdomain # - esa no es valida en internet
legolas.localdomain # - esa no es valida en internet
mail.ono.com # - es deberia ser valida con dns
Ademas eso debe coincidir con un dns en caso de las direcciones/nombres
publicos y sino deben estar en el archivo de hosts (/etc/hosts).
Por otro lado hay un FEATURE que se usa en sendmail para enmascarar todo
el correo saliente, es decir, si el emisor es root, en la salida sera
r...@tudominio.com asi siempre configuras un solo dominio.
Revisa MASQUERADE_AS('tudominio.com');
Mira tambien este articulo esta interesante y facil de seguir:
http://www.linuxparatodos.net/portal/staticpages/index.php?page=15-como-sendmail-apendice-01
salu2
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Hola, despues de seguir el manual, e intentar enviar un mail, obtengo la
siguiente salida en los logs y claro no recibo nada.
¿Alguna idea?
Saludos.
Feb 17 22:43:35 legolas sendmail[4164]: n1HLhTqF004164: from=celtha,
size=12, class=0, nrcpts=1,
msgid=200902172143.n1hlhtqf004...@legolas.localdomain,
relay=r...@localhost
Feb 17 22:43:50 legolas sendmail[4166]: n1HLhZbX004166:
from=cel...@legolas.localdomain, size=305, class=0, nrcpts=1,
msgid=200902172143.n1hlhtqf004...@legolas.localdomain, proto=ESMTP,
daemon=MTA, relay=legolas.localdomain [127.0.0.1]
Feb 17 22:43:50 legolas sendmail[4164]: n1HLhTqF004164:
to=maa...@ono.com, ctladdr=celtha (500/500), delay=00:00:21,
xdelay=00:00:15, mailer=relay, pri=30012, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1],
dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (n1HLhZbX004166 Message accepted for delivery)
Feb 17 22:44:15 legolas sendmail[4168]: n1HLhZbX004166:
to=maa...@ono.com, ctladdr=cel...@legolas.localdomain (500/500),
delay=00:00:25, xdelay=00:00:25, mailer=relay, pri=120305,
relay=smtp.ono.com. [62.42.230.12], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection
reset by smtp.ono.com.
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] problema de acceso al equipo
Ramón Cervantes escribió: Hola, Tengo un servidor web con Centos5 y Apache, el cual funcionaba correctamente. Hoy he instalado el soft Otrs, y además de que no me funciona, tampoco tengo acceso al servidor. No se si puede ser que el puerto 443 (conexión segura) esté cerrado. Si es así, ¿comos e abre este puerto? ¿alguien sabe si la instalación de Otrs ha podido afectar? gracias *Ramón Cervantes* Consultor Móvil 657 86 35 46 rcervan...@sinergium-sgh.com mailto:rcervan...@sinergium-sgh.com *www.sinergium-sgh.com http://www.sinergium-sgh.com/* P/ //Antes de imprimir este mensaje, por favor, compruebe que es verdaderamente necesario. // //El Medio Ambiente es cosa de todos.// //Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail./ ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es Hola, mira si en la salida del comando nmap 127.0.0.1 te aparece algo como esto 443/tcp open https ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] problema de acceso al equipo
Ramón Cervantes escribió: Hola, Tengo un servidor web con Centos5 y Apache, el cual funcionaba correctamente. Hoy he instalado el soft Otrs, y además de que no me funciona, tampoco tengo acceso al servidor. No se si puede ser que el puerto 443 (conexión segura) esté cerrado. Si es así, ¿comos e abre este puerto? ¿alguien sabe si la instalación de Otrs ha podido afectar? gracias *Ramón Cervantes* Consultor Móvil 657 86 35 46 rcervan...@sinergium-sgh.com mailto:rcervan...@sinergium-sgh.com *www.sinergium-sgh.com http://www.sinergium-sgh.com/* P/ //Antes de imprimir este mensaje, por favor, compruebe que es verdaderamente necesario. // //El Medio Ambiente es cosa de todos.// //Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail./ ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es Para descartar problemas con iptables podias mandar la salida de iptables -L -v ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Programa para cancelar procesos
Muchas gracias por tu colaboracion pero hubo algo que se me olvido comentar y creo que es bastante importante el problema lo tengo sobre servidores SCO Open Server 5 y corren /bin/sh Disculpen y gracias Raúl Eduardo Arboleda Zapata Ingeniero de Sistemas Cel +573 300 620 66 13 Ola +573 312 288 90 86 Comcel Medellin, Antioquia Colombia, S.A. - Mensaje original - De: Renato M. Covarrubias Romero rcova...@alumnos.inf.utfsm.cl Fecha: Martes, Febrero 17, 2009 0:51 am Asunto: Re: [CentOS-es] Programa para cancelar procesos A: centos-es@centos.org On Lunes 16 Febrero 2009 20:04:04 Raul Eduardo Arboleda Zapata escribió: Hola a todos reciban un saludo. No se si alguno de ustedes les a ocurrido que hay usuarios que ingresan y no vuelven a usar el teclado por un determinado tiempo que en ocasiones es muy largo y esta reportado por el finger -i. Alguno de ustedes a implementado un shell para cancelar procesos despues de cierto tiempo de ejecucion de usuario. Si tus usuarios utilizan 'bash/sh' como interprete... puedes definir la variable TMOUT en el /etc/bashrc: export TMOUT=120 Con eso, si no hacen nada en 2 minutos, bash termina. Que tal? Lo que dice el man bash(1) sobre esto: TMOUT If set to a value greater than zero, TMOUT is treated as the default timeout for the read builtin. The select command termi- nates if input does not arrive after TMOUT seconds when input is coming from a terminal. In an interactive shell, the value is interpreted as the number of seconds to wait for input after issuing the primary prompt. Bash terminates after waiting for that number of seconds if input does not arrive. Saludos! -- Renato Covarrubias Romero counter.li.org #399677 rcovarru [at] alumnos.inf.utfsm.cl ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] gcc 4.2
Hola a todos. Este es mi primer mensaje en la lista, yestoy muy contento de que exista una lista en español. Voy al grano. Necesito obtener gcc4.2.x o superior para compilar correctamente ffmpeg, el cual tiene serios inconvenientes con la versión 4.1.x Por supuesto, ya he agotado todas las alernativas, y quiero saber si es posible, antes de intentar compilalro y empaquetarlo por mi cuenta. Mi version de Centos es 5.2 Muchas gracias Normando ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] clamAV problem
On Saturday 14 February 2009 17:35:32 Kai Schaetzl wrote: Anne Wilson wrote on Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:12:47 +: that is userhomedir/tmp/clamd.socket Kai, I'm lost. That's what I touch'd, so it does exist. Read again, this is userhomedir/tmp/clamd.socket and not /tmp/clamd.socket. clamd does not use the socket userhomedir/tmp/clamd.socket unless you tell it to do so. And freshclam does not try to signal to that socket unless it cannot find the correct clamd.conf or has some other problem that you created. Find out why your freshclam is trying the wrong socket. If you installed clamav from rpmforge, it works out of the box. There is nothing needed to be touched, remove that touched file! Check your clamd.conf that the correct socket gets used, check freshclam.conf that the correct clamd.conf is read and start clamd. There's nothing else to do. And if you don't need clamd, there's no need to install it or signal to it. So, tell it not to signal. Clamd successfully notified about the update. I hate being beaten! :-) I simply removed the line that mentioned a local socket. So simple, and so easily missed. Yes, it probably wasn't enabled by default, but by misunderstanding. Thanks to all who helped. Anne Anne signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] GFS + Restarting iptables
Dear List, I have one last little problem with setting up an cluster. My gfs Mount will hang as soon as I do an iptables restart on one of the nodes.. Undoubtedly someone else with more experience with GFS will give you an answer, but to me this makes me think ip_conntrack stuff gets cleared out and sessions have to reestablish themselves. Ray Ray, Thanks for your fast answer and getting me into the right direction. This sounds like a possible solution, but I have no clue how to fix it. I googled already a lot on ip_conntrack + gfs, but don't see a possible solution coming up. Can someone/you please help me a little bit more with the issue? Thanks a lot! Sven ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] clamAV problem
Anne Wilson wrote: Clamd successfully notified about the update. I hate being beaten! :-) I simply removed the line that mentioned a local socket. So simple, and so easily missed. Yes, it probably wasn't enabled by default, but by misunderstanding. Thanks to all who helped. Anne Anne, Just for the record, I just installed the base packages of clamav, clamav-db using the rpmforge repo on a test machine. The option ... # Send the RELOAD command to clamd. # Default: no NotifyClamd /etc/clamd.conf Is enabled by default. So you did by no means break it. That is it's expected behavior. Also please not that in /etc/cron.daily/freshclam you will have the same option enabled, as follows /usr/bin/freshclam \ --quiet \ --datadir=/var/clamav \ --log=$LOG_FILE \ --log-verbose \ --daemon-notify=/etc/clamd.conf So no you did not break it. it was turned on by default. Brian -- http://wx.Tatorz.com Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org) -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] GFS + Restarting iptables
On Tuesday 17 February 2009, Sven Kaptein | MARS websolutions wrote: Undoubtedly someone else with more experience with GFS will give you an answer, but to me this makes me think ip_conntrack stuff gets cleared out and sessions have to reestablish themselves. Ray Ray, Thanks for your fast answer and getting me into the right direction. This sounds like a possible solution, but I have no clue how to fix it. I googled already a lot on ip_conntrack + gfs, but don't see a possible solution coming up. Can someone/you please help me a little bit more with the issue? You could allow traffic more broadly between your GFS-servers. Pro: packets will not depend on conntrack for delivery. Con: large hole in your firewall that you may not be able to live with. /Peter Thanks a lot! Sven signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] clamAV problem
Mail List wrote on Tue, 17 Feb 2009 06:41:27 -0500: So you did by no means break it. She broke it by changing the path for the socket. ;-) Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] There was a crash during the distribution installation over PXE using kickstart
Hi.
I configured a remote machine to allow network installation when the
machine is being loaded with PXE.
I'm using an x86_64 desktop.
The installation is almost fully automated with a kickstart file.
I enabled PXE in the BIOS, started the installation and in the middle of
the installation, i got a crash which reported an error.
I opened a bug on this issue:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3394.
Someone, called Tru, kindly gave me the following answer:
from your logs:
File /usr/lib/anaconda/iw/progress_gui.py, line 243, in
renderCallback
self.intf.icw.nextClicked()
File /usr/lib/anaconda/gui.py, line 1045, in handleRenderCallback
self.currentWindow.renderCallback()
IOError: [Errno 30] Read-only file system
...
which was caused by:
4hda: status timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy }
4ide: failed opcode was: unknown
3hda: no DRQ after issuing MULTWRITE_EXT
4ide0: reset: success
4hda: status timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy }
4ide: failed opcode was: unknown
3hda: no DRQ after issuing MULTWRITE_EXT
4ide0: reset: success
4hda: status timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy }
4ide: failed opcode was: unknown
...
4ide0: reset: success
4hda: status timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy }
4ide: failed opcode was: unknown
4end_request: I/O error, dev hda, sector 344757
3hda: no DRQ after issuing MULTWRITE_EXT
4hda: status error: status=0x58 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest }
4ide: failed opcode was: unknown
3hda: drive not ready for command
4hda: status error: status=0x58 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest }
4ide: failed opcode was: unknown
3hda: drive not ready for command
4ide0: reset: success
3Aborting journal on device dm-0.
2ext3_abort called.
2EXT3-fs error (device dm-0): ext3_journal_start_sb: Detected aborted
journal
2Remounting filesystem read-only
Issue History
Date Modified Username FieldChange
==
2009-02-17 11:30dotan_bar New Issue
2009-02-17 11:30dotan_bar File Added: bug_report.txt
2009-02-17 11:34dotan_bar File Added: default.ks
2009-02-17 11:35dotan_bar Note Added: 0008711
2009-02-17 12:20truNote Added: 0008713
==
Reply
Forward
nore...@centos.org
to me
show details 2:21 PM (1 hour ago)
Reply
The following issue has been CLOSED
==
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3394
==
Reported By:dotan_bar
Assigned To:
==
Project:CentOS-5
Issue ID: 3394
Category: -OTHER
Reproducibility:unable to reproduce
Severity: crash
Priority: normal
Status: closed
Resolution: open
Fixed in Version:
==
Date Submitted: 2009-02-17 11:30 UTC
Last Modified: 2009-02-17 12:21 UTC
- Show quoted text -
==
Summary:There was a crash during the distribution
installation over PXE using kickstart
Description:
I configured a remote machine to allow network installation when the
machine is being loaded with PXE.
The installation is almost fully automated with a kickstart file.
I enabled PXE in the BIOS, started the installation and in the middle of
the installation, i got a crash which reported an error.
I'm using x86_64 desktop.
==
--
dotan_bar - 2009-02-17 11:35
--
I attached the kick-start file too.
--
tru - 2009-02-17 12:20
--
from your logs:
File /usr/lib/anaconda/iw/progress_gui.py, line 243, in
renderCallback
self.intf.icw.nextClicked()
File /usr/lib/anaconda/gui.py, line 1045, in handleRenderCallback
self.currentWindow.renderCallback()
IOError: [Errno 30] Read-only file system
...
which was caused by:
4hda: status timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy }
4ide: failed opcode was: unknown
3hda: no DRQ after issuing MULTWRITE_EXT
4ide0: reset: success
4hda: status timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy }
4ide: failed opcode was: unknown
3hda: no DRQ after issuing MULTWRITE_EXT
4ide0: reset: success
4hda: status timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy }
4ide: failed opcode was: unknown
...
4ide0: reset: success
4hda: status timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy }
4ide: failed opcode was: unknown
4end_request: I/O
Re: [CentOS] clamAV problem
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 12:31:18 Kai Schaetzl wrote: Mail List wrote on Tue, 17 Feb 2009 06:41:27 -0500: So you did by no means break it. She broke it by changing the path for the socket. ;-) Yes. I had understood that I had to give it a suitable place for a local socket. It was, of course, totally unnecessary. When I realised that a socket existed in /var it seemed well worth trying simply commenting the line out. Bingo! A plain misunderstanding on my part. The help I got on this list prompted me to look in the right places for clues. That's more valuable than a simple instruction that cures it :-) Thanks again, all Anne signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] OT: Oracle client logging issue
Hi We have an app on CentOS 5 that is in pyton and uses some form of thin oracle client called oracle-instantclient-basic, this error is more towards that client i think but if anyone has seen this before then it would be great to hear about it. The basic issue is that we are getting lots of sqlnet.log 's on the filesystem and we dont seem to be ablr to configure the location of that log as there is no oracle configuration for the client as such it seems in terms of tnsnames etc that you'd get with the full client. Anyone ever used this client before or know how to direct its logs somewhere else? thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] There was a crash during the distribution installation over PXE using kickstart
Dotan Barak wrote:
Someone, called Tru, kindly gave me the following answer:
from your logs:
File /usr/lib/anaconda/iw/progress_gui.py, line 243, in
renderCallback
self.intf.icw.nextClicked()
File /usr/lib/anaconda/gui.py, line 1045, in handleRenderCallback
self.currentWindow.renderCallback()
IOError: [Errno 30] Read-only file system
...
which was caused by:
4hda: status timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy }
4ide: failed opcode was: unknown
3hda: no DRQ after issuing MULTWRITE_EXT
4ide0: reset: success
4hda: status timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy }
4ide: failed opcode was: unknown
3hda: no DRQ after issuing MULTWRITE_EXT
4ide0: reset: success
4hda: status timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy }
4ide: failed opcode was: unknown
I don't see your question in the rest od the stuff you have quoted.
You have a hardware failure. Fix that. After that you should be able to
install (are you able to do a manual install on that machine?).
Ralph
pgpsIu8q4GVmq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] There was a crash during the distribution installation over PXE using kickstart
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Ralph Angenendt ra+cen...@br-online.de wrote:
Dotan Barak wrote:
Someone, called Tru, kindly gave me the following answer:
from your logs:
File /usr/lib/anaconda/iw/progress_gui.py, line 243, in
renderCallback
self.intf.icw.nextClicked()
File /usr/lib/anaconda/gui.py, line 1045, in handleRenderCallback
self.currentWindow.renderCallback()
IOError: [Errno 30] Read-only file system
...
which was caused by:
4hda: status timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy }
4ide: failed opcode was: unknown
3hda: no DRQ after issuing MULTWRITE_EXT
4ide0: reset: success
4hda: status timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy }
4ide: failed opcode was: unknown
3hda: no DRQ after issuing MULTWRITE_EXT
4ide0: reset: success
4hda: status timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy }
4ide: failed opcode was: unknown
I don't see your question in the rest od the stuff you have quoted.
I don't really know what the HW problem is ...
You have a hardware failure. Fix that. After that you should be able to
install (are you able to do a manual install on that machine?).
The weird thing is when i tried to install the machine again,
everything was o.k.
(but i have several machines that i need to install using PXE, and
failure is problematic for me).
This is why i try to find a solution to the failure.
Thanks
Dotan
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] There was a crash during the distribution installation over PXE using kickstart
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 03:46:33PM +0200, Dotan Barak wrote: Hi. ... 4end_request: I/O error, dev hda, sector 344757 What is hard to understand here? If you reinstall and don't hit that sector you are fine... until you hit it while running on production. Replace your disk and re-install. Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgpqljPOLFVMQ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Lost konqueror navigation
I still have some outstanding problems caused by the recent power problems. All my ~/.kde ended up in lost+found, identified by numbered folders. I've gradually managed to trace the origin of all the files and returned them to their correct place. However a few may have been lost, as there are no files left and I still have some problems. I'll post them in separate threads. When I launch konqueror as user I have no Main or Location toolbar. Also, my menu options are Settings, Help, Edit, View and Tools, in that order. Location, Go, Bookmarks and Window are missing. If I knew what provides these I could copy them from another account. Can anyone help, please? Anne ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ?
Hi, I notice other users reporting problems with NFS lockd and was under the impression the problem was solve with kernel-2.6.18-92.1.13.el5. I am runing x86_64 versions of kernel-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.centos.plus ( i need XFS) on my nfs server and kernel 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 on my clients. I constantly get this error lockd: server 192.168.10.2 not responding, timed out Does the most recent centos_x64 kernel has the lockd patch ? maybe my problem is elsewhere, I never had problem with NFS before .. thanks, alain ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Gpg-agent will not start
I'm beginning to wonder whether I'm missing a package here, as no matter what I do I get the message that gpg-agent is not running and I should remove reference to it in the config or fix it. Here's what I seem to have: Installed Packages libgpg-error.i3861.4-2 installed Available Packages gpgme.i386 1.0.3-1.el5.rf rpmforge gpgme-devel.i386 1.0.3-1.el5.rf rpmforge gpgme03.i386 0.3.16-1.el5.rfrpmforge gpgme03-devel.i386 0.3.16-1.el5.rfrpmforge libgpg-error-devel.i386 1.4-2 base perl-Crypt-GPG.noarch1.63-1.el5.rf rpmforge perl-Mail-GPG.noarch 1.0.6-1.el5.rf rpmforge Now I realise that /usr/bin/gpg-agent does not exist. There are just gpg gpg-error gpgsplit gpgv gpg-zip kgpg Package gnupg - 1.4.5-13.i386 is already installed. Package pinentry - 0.7.2-1.el5.rf.i386 is already installed. What am I missing? Anne ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ?
On Tuesday 17 February 2009, Alain Terriault wrote: Hi, I notice other users reporting problems with NFS lockd and was under the impression the problem was solve with kernel-2.6.18-92.1.13.el5. I am runing x86_64 versions of kernel-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.centos.plus ( i need XFS) on my nfs server and kernel 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 on my clients. OT but, you have no reason to run the cenots.plus kernel for XFS. Use the normal kernel and kmod-xfs. /Peter signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ?
Hi, On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:44, Alain Terriault ala...@music.mcgill.ca wrote: I am runing x86_64 versions of kernel-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.centos.plus ( i need XFS) You no longer need CentOS Plus kernel for XFS. See: http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/CentOSPlus#line-76 HTH, Filipe ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ?
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Filipe Brandenburger filbran...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:44, Alain Terriault ala...@music.mcgill.ca wrote: I am runing x86_64 versions of kernel-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.centos.plus ( i need XFS) You no longer need CentOS Plus kernel for XFS. See: http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/CentOSPlus#line-76 And even this info is becoming obsolete. The current kmod-xfs package (in CentOS-5) is kABI-tracking, that is, it is independent of the kernel version. Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] GFS + Restarting iptables
on 2-17-2009 3:00 AM Sven Kaptein | MARS websolutions spake the following: Dear List, I have one last little problem with setting up an cluster. My gfs Mount will hang as soon as I do an iptables restart on one of the nodes.. Undoubtedly someone else with more experience with GFS will give you an answer, but to me this makes me think ip_conntrack stuff gets cleared out and sessions have to reestablish themselves. Ray Ray, Thanks for your fast answer and getting me into the right direction. This sounds like a possible solution, but I have no clue how to fix it. I googled already a lot on ip_conntrack + gfs, but don't see a possible solution coming up. Can someone/you please help me a little bit more with the issue? Thanks a lot! Sven Are your GFS mounts and your cluster on different sides of the firewall? Maybe you can do something simple like a tunnel between the clusters and the mounts. Should be easier and safer than punching holes in the firewall. Or put a separate subnet or vlan just for the GFS traffic. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Gpg-agent will not start
On Feb 17, 2009, at 10:52 AM, Anne Wilson wrote: What am I missing? ask yum: [sh...@srdce ~]$ yum provides /usr/bin/gpg-agent ... gnupg2.i386 : Utility for secure communication and data storage -steve -- If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Gpg-agent will not start
From: Steve Huff sh...@vecna.org What am I missing? [sh...@srdce ~]$ yum provides /usr/bin/gpg-agent gnupg2.i386 : Utility for secure communication and data storage I have Base and rpmforge repo and No Matches found... Which repo provides this package? Fedora? JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] vsftpd virtual users
USER 1 home = /home/ftproot/user1 has full read/write access USER 2 home = /home/ftproot/user2 has only read/download access mount --bind /home/ftproot/user1 /home/ftproot/user2 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Gpg-agent will not start
John Doe wrote: From: Steve Huff sh...@vecna.org What am I missing? [sh...@srdce ~]$ yum provides /usr/bin/gpg-agent gnupg2.i386 : Utility for secure communication and data storage I have Base and rpmforge repo and No Matches found... Which repo provides this package? Fedora? EPEL -- Rex ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Practical experience with NTLM/Windows Integrated Authentication [Apache]
Ok, here are the default settings that my kickstart file creates to allow me to join the domain and have samba manage the keytab. Ross, I was out of town and missed this thread which is of great interest to me as well. When you say have samba manage the keytab do you mean not use one as have a dedicated service account on the DC and have it generate the keytab and have it copied over? A lot of solution I have seen use that procedure which I have never wanted to do for obvious reasons. Also, I see you also configure ldap to point towards what looks like your AD server as well. How come you use both Samba/Winbind and ldap? Thanks for the info! jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Practical experience with NTLM/Windows Integrated Authentication [Apache]
Too bad. However, based on your information I found this on Google: http://sivel.net/2007/05/sso-apache-ad-1/ Thanks Filipe. Now I guess I can have a crack at this too. I haven't tried this one, but make note it lacks NTLMv2 and group support which made it non usable in my environment. Like Filipe suggested mod_auth_ntlm_winbind addresses this but it appears it's not actively maintained and I got stuck configuring it and gave up... jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] vsftpd virtual users
On 11-Feb-09, at 8:50 AM, dnk wrote: Well as far as I have made it, it is possible to share a directory by using a per user config option. It is geting hte different permissions I am having to deal with. Part of me thinks this would be easier using a real system account so I can restrict permissions using tools like chmod, etc. But I hate the idea of using system accounts for FTP. d Just to add to it, I got it all figured out. I just setup vsftpd to a regular non anon access type system. I then just had a per user config for the read only users that epcified the home directory of the read/ write user, and a enable_write=NO directive. d ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Practical experience with NTLM/Windows Integrated Authentication [Apache]
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 20:36 -0500, Ross Walker wrote: In Firefox go to your about:config page and scroll down to: network.negotiate-auth.delegation-uris and network.negotiate-auth.trusted-uris and for their string values enter your DNS domain to allow kerberos negotiation and delegation to occur. HA! I had these set already, but I still get prompted. So, today I decided I should delete the saved passwords for the apache hosted site I was trying to access, and viola, SSO worked! I can't believe I didn't remove the saved passwords before. Anyway, thanks for pointing out the Firefox settings. I doubt I would have remembered they were there. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 14:04:07 up 6 days, 15:51, 4 users, load average: 0.92, 1.02, 0.69 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Practical experience with NTLM/Windows Integrated Authentication [Apache]
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 14:07 -0500, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 20:36 -0500, Ross Walker wrote: In Firefox go to your about:config page and scroll down to: network.negotiate-auth.delegation-uris and network.negotiate-auth.trusted-uris and for their string values enter your DNS domain to allow kerberos negotiation and delegation to occur. HA! I had these set already, but I still get prompted. So, today I decided I should delete the saved passwords for the apache hosted site I was trying to access, and viola, SSO worked! I can't believe I didn't remove the saved passwords before. I should have mentioned that I only set network.negotiate-auth.trusted-uris. I left the other one blank. Setting it or not didn't seem to make a difference. But, based on this: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Integrated_Authentication The apache server should have been able to handle the authentication. Maybe I'm misunderstanding what delegation does. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 14:12:01 up 6 days, 15:59, 4 users, load average: 1.11, 1.13, 0.87 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Practical experience with NTLM/Windows Integrated Authentication [Apache]
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 10:27 -0700, Joseph L. Casale wrote: I haven't tried this one, but make note it lacks NTLMv2 and group support which made it non usable in my environment. Like Filipe suggested mod_auth_ntlm_winbind addresses this but it appears it's not actively maintained and I got stuck configuring it and gave up... I believe you can use kerberos auth and group lookups. For the group support, you need to do direct LDAP lookups. Just run a google search for 'kerberos apache group', or something along those lines, to find some links discussing what I've mentioned here. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 14:58:02 up 6 days, 16:45, 4 users, load average: 1.32, 1.27, 1.21 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Trying to restart IPv6 over PPP
My IPv6 connection over my PPPoE link is down. IPv4 is up. I have tried: /etc/ppp/ipv6-up ppp0 and get the error: ./network-functions: line 78: ifcfg-: No such file or directory The gateway has been up and running for 150 days. I have not been testing anything IPv6 out of my net for a while, so don't know when IPv6 connectivity went south. I don't want to restart the network, as I have a BIG rsync going right now (pulling down i386 FC10), and would like to get some external IPv6 testing done today ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Gpg-agent will not start
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 16:25:07 Steve Huff wrote: On Feb 17, 2009, at 10:52 AM, Anne Wilson wrote: What am I missing? ask yum: [sh...@srdce ~]$ yum provides /usr/bin/gpg-agent ... gnupg2.i386 : Utility for secure communication and data storage yum install gnupg2 Loading fastestmirror plugin Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * adobe-linux-i386: linuxdownload.adobe.com * kbs-CentOS-Extras: centos.karan.org * rpmforge: www.mirrorservice.org * base: mirrors.dedipower.com * updates: mirrors.dedipower.com * addons: mirrors.dedipower.com * extras: mirrors.dedipower.com Setting up Install Process Parsing package install arguments No package gnupg2 available. Nothing to do Anne signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Gpg-agent will not start
Anne Wilson wrote: On Tuesday 17 February 2009 16:25:07 Steve Huff wrote: On Feb 17, 2009, at 10:52 AM, Anne Wilson wrote: What am I missing? ask yum: [sh...@srdce ~]$ yum provides /usr/bin/gpg-agent ... gnupg2.i386 : Utility for secure communication and data storage yum install gnupg2 Loading fastestmirror plugin Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * adobe-linux-i386: linuxdownload.adobe.com * kbs-CentOS-Extras: centos.karan.org * rpmforge: www.mirrorservice.org * base: mirrors.dedipower.com * updates: mirrors.dedipower.com * addons: mirrors.dedipower.com * extras: mirrors.dedipower.com Setting up Install Process Parsing package install arguments No package gnupg2 available. Nothing to do As Rex Dieter said earlier - EPEL... [r...@wx1 ~]# yum info gnupg2 Loading priorities plugin Loading changelog plugin Loading downloadonly plugin Loading skip-broken plugin Loading fastestmirror plugin Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * epel: mirror.umoss.org * rpmforge: rh-mirror.linux.iastate.edu * extras: CentOS * local: CentOS * updates: CentOS * base: CentOS * centosplus: CentOS * addons: CentOS Excluding Packages from Red Hat Enterprise 5 - RPMforge.net - dag Finished Excluding Packages from CentOS-5 - Plus Finished 7252 packages excluded due to repository priority protections Available Packages Name : gnupg2 Arch : i386 Version: 2.0.8 Release: 1.el5 Size : 2.4 M Repo : epel Summary: Utility for secure communication and data storage Description: GnuPG is GNU's tool for secure communication and data storage. It can be used to encrypt data and to create digital signatures. It includes an advanced key management facility and is compliant with the proposed OpenPGP Internet standard as described in RFC2440 and the S/MIME standard as described by several RFCs. GnuPG 2.0 is the stable version of GnuPG integrating support for OpenPGP and S/MIME. It does not conflict with an installed 1.x OpenPGP-only version. GnuPG 2.0 is a newer version of GnuPG with additional support for S/MIME. It has a different design philosophy that splits functionality up into several modules. Both versions may be installed simultaneously without any conflict (gpg is called gpg2 in GnuPG 2). In fact, the gpg version from GnuPG 1.x is able to make use of the gpg-agent as included in GnuPG 2 and allows for seamless passphrase caching. The advantage of GnupG 1.x is its smaller size and no dependency on other modules at run and build time. Phil ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Practical experience with NTLM/Windows Integrated Authentication [Apache]
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu m3fr...@thesandhufamily.ca wrote: On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 14:07 -0500, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 20:36 -0500, Ross Walker wrote: In Firefox go to your about:config page and scroll down to: network.negotiate-auth.delegation-uris and network.negotiate-auth.trusted-uris and for their string values enter your DNS domain to allow kerberos negotiation and delegation to occur. HA! I had these set already, but I still get prompted. So, today I decided I should delete the saved passwords for the apache hosted site I was trying to access, and viola, SSO worked! I can't believe I didn't remove the saved passwords before. I should have mentioned that I only set network.negotiate-auth.trusted-uris. I left the other one blank. Setting it or not didn't seem to make a difference. But, based on this: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Integrated_Authentication The apache server should have been able to handle the authentication. Maybe I'm misunderstanding what delegation does. Delegation will allow a system or service to authenticate you to another system or service on your behalf. For example, say your apache server has a mysql database backend for an application that requires each user to authenticate individually, well without delegation the users would need to use another form of authentication such as HTTP basic authentication which would then pass it off to the mysql. Even if done over SSL this can open your application up to a man-in-the-middle attack. Kerberos delegation was designed to defeat the man-in-the-middle scenario through signing of the ticket request along the line and back. -Ross ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Practical experience with NTLM/Windows Integrated Authentication [Apache]
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote: Ok, here are the default settings that my kickstart file creates to allow me to join the domain and have samba manage the keytab. Ross, I was out of town and missed this thread which is of great interest to me as well. When you say have samba manage the keytab do you mean not use one as have a dedicated service account on the DC and have it generate the keytab and have it copied over? A lot of solution I have seen use that procedure which I have never wanted to do for obvious reasons. If you don't have a keytab file when you use samba to join to the domain and you have the 'use kerberos keytab = yes' set in your smb.conf, then samba creates one and populates it with the AD compatible host SPNs and machine password. From that point on it will keep the keytab in sync. I don't know if it will add these if SPNs already exist, I haven't tried it. Also, I see you also configure ldap to point towards what looks like your AD server as well. How come you use both Samba/Winbind and ldap? LDAP wasn't necessary, I use it for querying AD attributes using the OpenLDAP tools (I don't trust Microsoft and think they hide attributes in ADSIEdit!). Though I could have used NSS_LDAP instead of Winbind, I just would need to set UID/GID for every user and group in AD which was just too much of a PITA. -Ross ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Practical experience with NTLM/Windows Integrated Authentication [Apache]
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu m3fr...@thesandhufamily.ca wrote: On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 10:27 -0700, Joseph L. Casale wrote: I haven't tried this one, but make note it lacks NTLMv2 and group support which made it non usable in my environment. Like Filipe suggested mod_auth_ntlm_winbind addresses this but it appears it's not actively maintained and I got stuck configuring it and gave up... I believe you can use kerberos auth and group lookups. For the group support, you need to do direct LDAP lookups. Just run a google search for 'kerberos apache group', or something along those lines, to find some links discussing what I've mentioned here. If you have a lot of hosts that need access to winbind mapped UIDs/GIDs instead of setting up winbind everywhere and having a administrative headache if the RID mapping gets messed up on one host, setup a winbind to NIS server that puts the mappings into NIS maps and propagate the information that way. Only real difference on the other hosts is to switch 'winbind' to 'nis' in nsswitch.conf. -Ross ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] 4 X 500 gb drives - best software raid config for a backup server?
Hi there, I am currently setting up a server that will house my backups (simply using rsync). This system has 4 X 500 gb drives and I am looking to raid for max drive space and data safety. Performance is not so much a concern. My experience with software raids in nil, so some of these may seem like pretty dumb questions. I was thinking a raid 1 is probably sufficient. Would it be best to raid 1 two drives each and LVM them together? My next question would be about how to do this as I have never done a linux software raid. D ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 4 X 500 gb drives - best software raid config for a backup server?
For controller, what is the interface on your drives?? SCSI, SAS?? John Plemons dnk wrote: Hi there, I am currently setting up a server that will house my backups (simply using rsync). This system has 4 X 500 gb drives and I am looking to raid for max drive space and data safety. Performance is not so much a concern. My experience with software raids in nil, so some of these may seem like pretty dumb questions. I was thinking a raid 1 is probably sufficient. Would it be best to raid 1 two drives each and LVM them together? My next question would be about how to do this as I have never done a linux software raid. D ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 4 X 500 gb drives - best software raid config for a backup server?
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 01:52:52PM -0800, dnk wrote: Hi there, I am currently setting up a server that will house my backups (simply using rsync). This system has 4 X 500 gb drives and I am looking to raid for max drive space and data safety. Performance is not so much a concern. My experience with software raids in nil, so some of these may seem like pretty dumb questions. I was thinking a raid 1 is probably sufficient. Would it be best to raid 1 two drives each and LVM them together? This probably gives you both the best reliability and the best performance (RAID 10). You can potentially lose two drives (although they'd need to be on opposite mirrored subsets) and be OK. If you want to maximize space, RAID5 would work as well. You'd get nearly 1500GB out of this setup but could only survive one disk failure. Your other option would be RAID6 which would net you the same amount of space as RAID10 with four drives and also allow for two drive failures (any of the drives in this case). If you anticipate adding additional drives later, this would allow you to add one drive at a time instead of requiring a pair. RAID6 has a write performance penalty, but I imagine it would still run well enough to handle backups. I think I might lean towards the RAID6 option in this case same space as RAID10, but allows you to lose *any* two drives and still maintain functionality at the expense of some write performance. My next question would be about how to do this as I have never done a linux software raid. D Ray ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 4 X 500 gb drives - best software raid config for a backup server?
dnk wrote: Hi there, I am currently setting up a server that will house my backups (simply using rsync). This system has 4 X 500 gb drives and I am looking to raid for max drive space and data safety. Performance is not so much a concern. My experience with software raids in nil, so some of these may seem like pretty dumb questions. I was thinking a raid 1 is probably sufficient. Would it be best to raid 1 two drives each and LVM them together? My next question would be about how to do this as I have never done a linux software raid. D Linux software raid works fine and I use this recipe http://linux-raid.osdl.org/index.php/Partitioning_RAID_/_LVM_on_RAID If you can afford a proper hardware raid controller for raid 6, that would be of better performance than linux software raid, other than that I have found performance of linux based md using raid 1 to work fine. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos begin:vcard fn:Rob Kampen n:Kampen;Rob email;internet:r...@kampensonline.net tel;cell:407-341-3815 version:2.1 end:vcard ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 4 X 500 gb drives - best software raid config for a backup server?
On 17-Feb-09, at 2:01 PM, John Plemons wrote: For controller, what is the interface on your drives?? SCSI, SAS?? John Plemons Dell 2950, SAS 6 Host Bus Controller. d ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] chkconfig path
Hi all! I'm trying to install FOG (an opensource ghostlike backup/rollout server) on a centos 5 box but at the end of the isntaller script it can't find chckconfig altough it's in /sbn and I run the (redhat specific install) script as root. How can I make sure chckconfig gets found? Tried adding the full path in the script to /sbin/chckconfig but got the same error. Regards, Geert -- * Checking package: perl...OK * Checking package: perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5...OK * Checking package: lftp...OK Configuring services. * Setting up fog user...Exists * Setting up and starting MySql../lib/redhat/functions.sh: line 440: chkconfig: command not found ...Failed! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 4 X 500 gb drives - best software raid config for a backup server?
On 17-Feb-09, at 2:08 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: Linux software raid works fine and I use this recipe http://linux-raid.osdl.org/index.php/Partitioning_RAID_/_LVM_on_RAID If you can afford a proper hardware raid controller for raid 6, that would be of better performance than linux software raid, other than that I have found performance of linux based md using raid 1 to work fine. Rob, So are you using 4 drives, and making two different raid 1 (2 drives each), then joining them via LVM? d ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] chkconfig path
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Geert Batsleer batsl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all! I'm trying to install FOG (an opensource ghostlike backup/rollout server) on a centos 5 box but at the end of the isntaller script it can't find chckconfig altough it's in /sbn and I run the (redhat specific install) script as root. How can I make sure chckconfig gets found? Tried adding the full path in the script to /sbin/chckconfig but got the same error. Regards, Geert -- * Checking package: perl...OK * Checking package: perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5...OK * Checking package: lftp...OK Configuring services. * Setting up fog user...Exists * Setting up and starting MySql../lib/redhat/functions.sh: line 440: chkconfig: command not found ...Failed! Try $ export PATH=/sbin:$PATH before running the script ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] chkconfig path
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 23:14 +, Didi wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Geert Batsleer batsl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all! I'm trying to install FOG (an opensource ghostlike backup/rollout server) on a centos 5 box but at the end of the isntaller script it can't find chckconfig altough it's in /sbn and I run the (redhat specific install) script as root. How can I make sure chckconfig gets found? Tried adding the full path in the script to /sbin/chckconfig but got the same error. Regards, Geert -- * Checking package: perl...OK * Checking package: perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5...OK * Checking package: lftp...OK Configuring services. * Setting up fog user...Exists * Setting up and starting MySql../lib/redhat/functions.sh: line 440: chkconfig: command not found ...Failed! Try $ export PATH=/sbin:$PATH before running the script Since he ran as root, /sbin (OP: note the correct spelling) s/b part of his path already. If that's the case, the above export will just duplicate the entry (no real harm done though). From what is shown in the snippet of results, I would _guess_ that some function or sub-shell has modified the path or is looking for an application-specific chkconfig? Add a set -x just ahead of the command to get a verbose output. Maybe that will give a clue. Also, a set or export command with no arguments will show the environment. Keep an eye out for anything that modifies the path. snip sig stuff HTH -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] chkconfig path
Geert Batsleer wrote on Tue, 17 Feb 2009 23:25:42 +0100: I run the (redhat specific install) script as root. what exactly does it have at that line 440? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Practical experience with NTLM/Windows Integrated Authentication [Apache]
If you have a lot of hosts that need access to winbind mapped UIDs/GIDs instead of setting up winbind everywhere and having a administrative headache if the RID mapping gets messed up on one host, setup a winbind to NIS server that puts the mappings into NIS maps and propagate the information that way. Only real difference on the other hosts is to switch 'winbind' to 'nis' in nsswitch.conf. What's wrong with winbind on a ldap backend? I have winbind installed everywhere...all pointing to a single ldap instance. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Practical experience with NTLM/Windows Integrated Authentication [Apache]
On Feb 17, 2009, at 7:50 PM, Christopher Chan christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote: If you have a lot of hosts that need access to winbind mapped UIDs/GIDs instead of setting up winbind everywhere and having a administrative headache if the RID mapping gets messed up on one host, setup a winbind to NIS server that puts the mappings into NIS maps and propagate the information that way. Only real difference on the other hosts is to switch 'winbind' to 'nis' in nsswitch.conf. What's wrong with winbind on a ldap backend? I have winbind installed everywhere...all pointing to a single ldap instance. Well yeah you can use ldap too to keep the rid mappings centralized. I just think configuring ldap, putting schema together and configuring samba everywhere is more work then nis, but to each their own. -Ross ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] question on hwclock
I am trying to hwclock to set the time. (hwclock -w) this is what I get on standard 5.2 x86_64. hwclock --debug hwclock from util-linux-2.13-pre7 hwclock: Open of /dev/rtc failed, errno=19: No such device. No usable clock interface found. Cannot access the Hardware Clock via any known method. [r...@devcentos5x64 src]# ls -l /dev/rtc crw--- 1 root root 10, 135 Feb 6 13:32 /dev/rtc Any thoughts? Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] reading sar data
Hi, I have a problem reading sar data. I have some server but no monitoring tools like cacti or nagios on it. every end of month I got the sar log manually and have to generate report for it but I have no idea how to read it. on this page :http://pagesperso-orange.fr/sebastien.godard/tutorial.html i found there is tool called sadf, can i use it on CentOS 4 or it just available on Centos 5? I found sadf on centos5 but not on centos 4. are there any tools that could be used to generate a graphic from a month historical sar data? best regards, -- Muhammad Panji http://sumodirjo.wordpress.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] reading sar data
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, muhammad panji wrote: Hi, I have a problem reading sar data. I have some server but no monitoring tools like cacti or nagios on it. every end of month I got the sar log manually and have to generate report for it but I have no idea how to read it. on this page :http://pagesperso-orange.fr/sebastien.godard/tutorial.html i found there is tool called sadf, can i use it on CentOS 4 or it just available on Centos 5? I found sadf on centos5 but not on centos 4. are there any tools that could be used to generate a graphic from a month historical sar data? best regards, kSar http://ksar.atomique.net/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Check out my Facebook profile
Sorry for this. Please disregard my previous mail. Get your new Email address! Grab the Email name you#39;ve always wanted before someone else does! http://mail.promotions.yahoo.com/newdomains/aa/___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 4 X 500 gb drives - best software raid config for a backup server?
Dnk, I use two drives with linux raid 1 sets for the OS for all my CentOS machines, drives are cheaper than my rebuild time and hassle. I actually use 3 partitions mirrored on each: /boot of 100M; swap of 2 time RAM (disk is cheap); 70G as /, then the remainder is extended partition for lvm - in this case the extended partition is not mirrored as the contents are for mythTV recordings that I don't mind loosing. I have a HD TV card that takes 5G per hour of recording so space matters more than redundancy - also use xfs on this lvm part as it seems to work better for huge files. In your case I would set up both the raid 1 sets, put lvm volumes in place and allocate as needed for the mount points you want to have. Because you are using lvm, if you get the allocation wrong it can be remedied without too much hassle. Hope this helps. Rob dnk wrote: On 17-Feb-09, at 2:08 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: Linux software raid works fine and I use this recipe http://linux-raid.osdl.org/index.php/Partitioning_RAID_/_LVM_on_RAID If you can afford a proper hardware raid controller for raid 6, that would be of better performance than linux software raid, other than that I have found performance of linux based md using raid 1 to work fine. Rob, So are you using 4 drives, and making two different raid 1 (2 drives each), then joining them via LVM? d ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos begin:vcard fn:Rob Kampen n:Kampen;Rob email;internet:rkam...@kampensonline.com tel;home:407-876-4854 version:2.1 end:vcard ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 4 X 500 gb drives - best software raid config for a backup server?
Would it be best to raid 1 two drives each and LVM them together? My next question would be about how to do this as I have never done a linux software raid. I would do it this way if they are not system disks: Eg: sdc + sdd = md0 (raid 1) sde + sdf = md1 (raid 1) md0 + md1 = md2 (raid 0) Use md2 as a physical volume ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] After electric breaking: HARDWARE ERROR Kernel panic
Fixed ! I boot with old kernel and reboot again with new kernel. That's ok now Thanks -- http://vnoss.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] realtime backup
Hi, I had a cfml application running on mysql database. Can some suggest a realtime backup solution via ftp say every 5mins without damaging the database? Thanks regards ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
