Re: [CentOS-docs] revision numbers on translated articles
Dag Wieers napsal(a): On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Marcus Moeller wrote: BTW I think retaining revision numbers in translated documents makes a lot of sense here too. Wouldn't it be nice if somehow MoinMoin would have a relation between original and translated content to it could keep track and report about changes ? It sounds like a decent project for GSoC. Regards, David Hrbáč ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-es] Replica DNS y DHCP
Buenas tardes Listeros, si alguno a implementado replicas en servicios DHCP y DNS (los cambios que se realicen en un servidor se replique de inmediato en otro) o tienen algun link que me sirva de guía sería de muchisima ayuda. Como siempre gracias de antemano. Cordialmente, Carlos. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] php 5.2
Melinda Odom wrote: I am running centos 5 with php 5.1.6-20 and mysql 5.0.45-7.el5 on a production server running a lot of ecommerce stores. The future next versions of these stores all are requiring php 5.2 at least. I don't want any problems with the ecommerce stores I have now with php 5.1.6-20 so don't know what to do. There is a version of php 5.2 in the CentOS-testing repository, as there are versions of php5.2 for CentOS in Jason Litka's repository and in Remi Collet's repository. I found several posts last night about php 5.2 never being in centos 5 because redhat wouldn't support centos. That sentence does not make any sense at all. Ralph pgpgkDxGIt6sH.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] php 5.2
Ralph Angenendt wrote: Melinda Odom wrote: I found several posts last night about php 5.2 never being in centos 5 because redhat wouldn't support centos. That sentence does not make any sense at all. And I wonder why you're asking the exact same question again, after getting several replies over the weekend. Ralph pgp0rtdhXFOck.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] grub issue
HI, I always get a grub prompt ,after I installed 2nd processor to the Server IBM x3610 At the grub prompt, I always have to issue below commands. Then, Server starts successfully. grub root (hd0,0) Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0x83 grub kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.18-128.1.1.el5PAE [Linux-bzImage, setup=0x1e00, size=0x1bb714] grub initrd /initrd-2.6.18-128.1.1.el5PAE.img grub boot Could you pls let me know to overcome this issue? Hope to hear from you. -- Thank you Indunil Jayasooriya ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] grub issue
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:10:06 +0530 Indunil Jayasooriya wrote: Could you pls let me know to overcome this issue? What is the content of /boot/grub/grub.conf ? -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] grub issue
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 02:10:06PM +0530, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote: HI, I always get a grub prompt ,after I installed 2nd processor to the Server IBM x3610 At the grub prompt, I always have to issue below commands. Then, Server starts successfully. grub root (hd0,0) Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0x83 grub kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.18-128.1.1.el5PAE [Linux-bzImage, setup=0x1e00, size=0x1bb714] grub initrd /initrd-2.6.18-128.1.1.el5PAE.img grub boot Could you pls let me know to overcome this issue? Don't cheat... you are not running CentOS. ask your redhat support, centos has not released (yet) this kernel, or read the man pages about grub. Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B pgp78inXUiQiE.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] grub issue
Hi, Thanks for your quick response What is the content of /boot/grub/grub.conf ? Pls see below [r...@authpassword ~]# cat /boot/grub/grub.conf # grub.conf generated by anaconda # # Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file # NOTICE: You have a /boot partition. This means that # all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /boot/, eg. # root (hd2,0) # kernel /vmlinuz-version ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 # initrd /initrd-version.img #boot=/dev/sdb default=0 timeout=5 splashimage=(hd2,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz hiddenmenu title Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (2.6.18-128.1.1.el5PAE) root (hd2,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.18-128.1.1.el5PAE ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 rhgb quiet initrd /initrd-2.6.18-128.1.1.el5PAE.img title Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (2.6.18-92.el5PAE) root (hd2,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.18-92.el5PAE ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 rhgb quiet initrd /initrd-2.6.18-92.el5PAE.img -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com -- Thank you Indunil Jayasooriya ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] php 5.2
Jim Perrin wrote: On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Melinda Odom i...@designhosting.biz wrote: Hi, Is there any news about CentOS 5.2 updating to php 5.2? There have been packages for php 5.2 in the Centos Testing repository for a while now. They work fine (for me at least), it's just that very few folks are reporting the functionality, so they aren't moving into centosplus or more common repositories. See http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories for more information It seems to me that feedback to packages in testing are getting lost. I sent mine for PHP and PostgreSQL (both run really fine on a number of our servers), but there is no reply and no reaction. Maybe a Wiki-Page or a ticket would be a better place to gather feedback then the L. Regards, Peter -- Dott. Peter Hopfgartner R3 GIS Srl - GmbH Via Johann Kravogl-Str. 2 I-39012 Meran/Merano (BZ) Email: peter.hopfgart...@r3-gis.com Tel. : +39 0473 494949 Fax : +39 0473 069902 www : http://www.r3-gis.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] php 5.2
Peter Hopfgartner wrote: It seems to me that feedback to packages in testing are getting lost. I sent mine for PHP and PostgreSQL (both run really fine on a number of our servers), but there is no reply and no reaction. Maybe a Wiki-Page or a ticket would be a better place to gather feedback then the L. Its not really possible to reply to each and every email that is sent through. Also, one persons's feedback isnt enough to move the pkgs away from testing to stable. Were working on the entire webstack stuff, which will get a complete makeover and also allow for more recent packages in. I hope to work on that once 5.3 is out of the door. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Wine
Bart Schaefer wrote: On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Dag Wieers d...@centos.org wrote: On Sun, 15 Mar 2009, Bart Schaefer wrote: There are wine RPMs at http://apt.sw.be/redhat/el5/en/i386/rpmforge/RPMS/ -- but for some reason yum list wine is not finding it on the CentOS5 system to which I have access, even though rpmforge.repo is enabled. Curious. You are on a 64bit CentOS ? Ah, yes. That would explain it. Install 32bit wine. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NTP error message on /var/log/messages
Thanks. You are right. I did NOT reboot after change Ip address. It is correct now. --- 09/3/15 (日)，Filipe Brandenburger filbran...@gmail.com 寫道： 寄件者: Filipe Brandenburger filbran...@gmail.com 主旨: Re: [CentOS] NTP error message on /var/log/messages 收件者: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org 日期: 2009 3 15 日 下午 7:30 Hi, 2009/3/15 mcclnx mcc mcc...@yahoo.com.tw: I just setup CENTOS 4.7 with latest patches on DELL server. 狢 also configured NTP point to out time server. 狢 found /var/log/messages file every 20 to 30 minutes will generate a error message : Mar 15 14:28:15 SER1 ntpd[25037]: sendto(172.29.21.16): Invalid argument I saw this once when I changed a machine's IP but did not restart the NTP service. The daemon was still trying to send/receive packets using the old IP. After restarting NTP (service ntpd restart) the problem was fixed. Make sure you also check that NTP is properly synchronizing the clocks with the ntpq -p command. HTH, Filipe ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos __ 付費才容量無上限？Yahoo!奇摩電子信箱2.0免費給你，信件永遠不必刪！ http://tw.mg0.mail.yahoo.com/dc/landing ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] That RTL8169 thing...
Motherboard - Intel DG41TY Device: RealTek: 8111D Driver: RTL8169 Causes Kernel panic during install and boot. -- It seems that the newer the card that uses this driver, the worse the problems are. Is there any plan to roll a newer version into the installer or the actual distribution itself? Thanks, -Drew ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] That RTL8169 thing...
2009/3/16 Drew Weaver drew.wea...@thenap.com: Motherboard - Intel DG41TY Device: RealTek: 8111D Driver: RTL8169 Causes Kernel panic during install and boot. It seems that the newer the card that uses this driver, the worse the problems are. Is there any plan to roll a newer version into the installer or the actual distribution itself? There's a forum thread about DG41TY and NIC: http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flattopic_id=19040forum=40 Maybe relevant? Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] hplip problems - configure: error: cannot find libjpeg support
On Thursday 12 March 2009 15:59, Roger Wells wrote: Anne Wilson wrote: On Thursday 12 March 2009 14:45:27 Roger Wells wrote: I actually did install the home printer last night (Photosmart C6180). hp-setup' ran fine, discovered the printer and installed it just as it did for the LJ4350 (it didn't find the correct PPD file but...). The good news is that even though hp-toolbox won't run the Centos Scanner Tool works. It discovered the scanner correctly and I was able to operate with it as expected. The scanner is also available within appropriate applications such as OpenOffice and the Gimp. So maybe we don't need hp-toolbox so much after all. Glad you got it working, Roger. I knew I wouldn't have time to have another go at this until tomorrow. So did you use the 3.9.2 version? Anything to report about the actual installation? yes the hplip version is 3.9.2. First I removed the installed version which was 1.6.7, I think. Then I followed the directions at: http://hplipopensource.com/hplip-web/install/manual/distros/centos.html I finally made time to try this again. This went well but the hp-check near the end indicated two or three errors that would show up at run-time were present. These are some of what we have been discussing in this thread and are apparently the ones that will prevent hp-toolbox from running. They do not apparently affect hp-setup. . I can't run either hp-toolbox or hp-setup (it complains that it can't run the gui) but I could run 'hp-setup -i' which gives a text install. I thought I might as well follow through the whole kaboodle, but when it got to setting up fax headers it complained (again!) that python-dbus is not installed. It then said warning: Qt/PyQt 4 initialization failed. error: hp-setup requires GUI support (try running with --qt3). Also, try using interactive (-i) mode.(which is what I'd just done.) Run hp-setup as root (the only way) and it should find your printers. For each of mine a warning was issued: error: No PPD found for model laserjet_4350. Trying old algorithm... I saw that too - but then it continued and installed PPD file: foomatic:HP-PhotoSmart_7150-hpijs.ppd. I'm fairly sure that that is the wrong driver. The HP-PhotoSmart_C series are not the same as the HP-PhotoSmart series. The C7100 driver is correct, the 7100 driver does not work. Fortunately the device/queue that I installed under CUPS is still available to me. In the case of the C6180 this resulted in all printing going to 4x6 inch pages to a printer that only had photograph page size options. When offered to search for PPD files during installation you can take that route and search in /usr/share/ppd/HP for a more appropriate driver. Why hp-setup doesn't find drivers there I don't know. I had to select the one with the .gz extension to avoid an error about a missing foomatic-rip-hplip something or other. You can apparently do this PPD changeover after installation. I did that with the C6180. If it still insists on printing in a 4x6 format I will report back. As I said earlier the Centos 5.2 Scanner Tool seems to work just fine. I can't see the scanner at all, but then xsane seems to bomb out on me. I don't actually need it on this box, and to tell the truth, I can't spare any more time on it. If it was important I'd use the HP Launchpad to get it fixed, but I'm just going to bale out now. I'm glad you got a working solution. Anne ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding
The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the webmaster should happen to read this... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] grub issue
on 3-16-2009 1:55 AM Indunil Jayasooriya spake the following: Hi, Thanks for your quick response What is the content of /boot/grub/grub.conf ? Pls see below [r...@authpassword ~]# cat /boot/grub/grub.conf # grub.conf generated by anaconda # # Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file # NOTICE: You have a /boot partition. This means that # all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /boot/, eg. # root (hd2,0) # kernel /vmlinuz-version ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 # initrd /initrd-version.img #boot=/dev/sdb default=0 timeout=5 splashimage=(hd2,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz hiddenmenu title Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (2.6.18-128.1.1.el5PAE) root (hd2,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.18-128.1.1.el5PAE ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 rhgb quiet initrd /initrd-2.6.18-128.1.1.el5PAE.img title Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (2.6.18-92.el5PAE) root (hd2,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.18-92.el5PAE ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 rhgb quiet initrd /initrd-2.6.18-92.el5PAE.img -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com For one thing, the commands you show in the first message have a root of hd0, but your grub conf has a root of hd2. How about you try and correct this easy one first? -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding
On 3/16/09, R P Herrold herr...@centos.org wrote: On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Lanny Marcus wrote: The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the webmaster should happen to read this... working fine here, and from two other test locations -- it might make more sense to use the IRC channel for time sensitive reports OK. Good. It may be a temporary connectivity problem, to sites located in certain areas of the USA. Still not loading for me. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding
R P Herrold wrote: On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Lanny Marcus wrote: The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the webmaster should happen to read this... working fine here, and from two other test locations -- it might make more sense to use the IRC channel for time sensitive reports yeah, from here and from my work, too, which are on two very different networks. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding
Always useful to check with: http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/ http://internetpulse.net/ http://just-ping.com Before reporting connectivity problems. Patrick -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Lanny Marcus Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 1:39 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding On 3/16/09, R P Herrold herr...@centos.org wrote: On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Lanny Marcus wrote: The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the webmaster should happen to read this... working fine here, and from two other test locations -- it might make more sense to use the IRC channel for time sensitive reports OK. Good. It may be a temporary connectivity problem, to sites located in certain areas of the USA. Still not loading for me. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding
On 3/16/09, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: R P Herrold wrote: On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Lanny Marcus wrote: The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the webmaster should happen to read this... working fine here, and from two other test locations -- it might make more sense to use the IRC channel for time sensitive reports yeah, from here and from my work, too, which are on two very different networks. I'm glad it's working for you and Russ. Must be a routing problem from here (I use opendns.com). I can get to my web sites, which are on servers in CT, without any problems, so it seems to be a geographic thing, from my end. Whatever the problem is, the good news is that the CentOS web site is up and running OK for you.:-) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Lanny Marcus wrote: The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the webmaster should happen to read this... working fine here, and from two other test locations -- it might make more sense to use the IRC channel for time sensitive reports -- Russ herrold ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding
On 3/16/09, Flaherty, Patrick pflahe...@wsi.com wrote: Always useful to check with: http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/ http://internetpulse.net/ http://just-ping.com Before reporting connectivity problems. Cool Pat. I'd never heard of any of those sites before. Thanks. I clicked on your first link, tested CentOS and it's just me. Not sure what the problem is, but hopefully it will go away. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] hplip problems - configure: error: cannot find libjpeg support
Anne Wilson wrote: On Thursday 12 March 2009 15:59, Roger Wells wrote: Anne Wilson wrote: On Thursday 12 March 2009 14:45:27 Roger Wells wrote: I actually did install the home printer last night (Photosmart C6180). hp-setup' ran fine, discovered the printer and installed it just as it did for the LJ4350 (it didn't find the correct PPD file but...). The good news is that even though hp-toolbox won't run the Centos Scanner Tool works. It discovered the scanner correctly and I was able to operate with it as expected. The scanner is also available within appropriate applications such as OpenOffice and the Gimp. So maybe we don't need hp-toolbox so much after all. Glad you got it working, Roger. I knew I wouldn't have time to have another go at this until tomorrow. So did you use the 3.9.2 version? Anything to report about the actual installation? yes the hplip version is 3.9.2. First I removed the installed version which was 1.6.7, I think. Then I followed the directions at: http://hplipopensource.com/hplip-web/install/manual/distros/centos.html I finally made time to try this again. This went well but the hp-check near the end indicated two or three errors that would show up at run-time were present. These are some of what we have been discussing in this thread and are apparently the ones that will prevent hp-toolbox from running. They do not apparently affect hp-setup. . I can't run either hp-toolbox or hp-setup (it complains that it can't run the gui) but I could run 'hp-setup -i' which gives a text install. I thought I might as well follow through the whole kaboodle, but when it got to setting up fax headers it complained (again!) that python-dbus is not installed. It then said warning: Qt/PyQt 4 initialization failed. error: hp-setup requires GUI support (try running with --qt3). Also, try using interactive (-i) mode.(which is what I'd just done.) Run hp-setup as root (the only way) and it should find your printers. For each of mine a warning was issued: error: No PPD found for model laserjet_4350. Trying old algorithm... I saw that too - but then it continued and installed PPD file: foomatic:HP-PhotoSmart_7150-hpijs.ppd. I'm fairly sure that that is the wrong driver. The HP-PhotoSmart_C series are not the same as the HP-PhotoSmart series. The C7100 driver is correct, the 7100 driver does not work. Fortunately the device/queue that I installed under CUPS is still available to me. In the case of the C6180 this resulted in all printing going to 4x6 inch pages to a printer that only had photograph page size options. When offered to search for PPD files during installation you can take that route and search in /usr/share/ppd/HP for a more appropriate driver. Why hp-setup doesn't find drivers there I don't know. I had to select the one with the .gz extension to avoid an error about a missing foomatic-rip-hplip something or other. You can apparently do this PPD changeover after installation. I did that with the C6180. If it still insists on printing in a 4x6 format I will report back. As I said earlier the Centos 5.2 Scanner Tool seems to work just fine. I can't see the scanner at all, but then xsane seems to bomb out on me. I don't actually need it on this box, and to tell the truth, I can't spare any more time on it. If it was important I'd use the HP Launchpad to get it fixed, but I'm just going to bale out now. I'm glad you got a working solution. good luck Anne, my situation got a little more bizarre. The C series driver never worked. At some level perhaps it did because test page's that I printed would never come out, until I rebooted then they would all come on out. The foomatic 7150 driver was never offered to me but I tried it and it seems to work although I don't think faxing does. And scanning still seems fine. For this to work it was necessary to install via HPLIP. cheers, roger wells Anne ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Roger Wells, P.E. SAIC 221 Third St Newport, RI 02840 401-847-4210 (voice) 401-849-1585 (fax) roger.k.we...@saic.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] grub issue
Indunil Jayasooriya induni...@gmail.com wrote: Pls see below [r...@authpassword ~]# cat /boot/grub/grub.conf # grub.conf generated by anaconda # # Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file # NOTICE: You have a /boot partition. This means that # all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /boot/, eg. # root (hd2,0) # kernel /vmlinuz-version ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 # initrd /initrd-version.img #boot=/dev/sdb default=0 timeout=5 splashimage=(hd2,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz hiddenmenu title Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (2.6.18-128.1.1.el5PAE) root (hd2,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.18-128.1.1.el5PAE ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 rhgb quiet initrd /initrd-2.6.18-128.1.1.el5PAE.img title Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (2.6.18-92.el5PAE) root (hd2,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.18-92.el5PAE ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 rhgb quiet initrd /initrd-2.6.18-92.el5PAE.img as a follow up to why it was necessary to issue the following command at the grub command prompt: grub root (hd0,0) Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0x83 Note that you are telling grub to find the root file system on drive hd0 and partition 0. The grub.conf file provided has root set to drive hd2 and partition 0. It appears that something changed the order of your drive numbering (e.g. you moved the cable that attached you boot drive from IDE1 to IDE0 when you installed the new CPU). Cheers, Dave -- Politics, n. Strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles. -- Ambrose Bierce ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] hplip problems - configure: error: cannot find libjpeg support
On Monday 16 March 2009 18:36:43 Roger Wells wrote: Anne Wilson wrote: my situation got a little more bizarre. The C series driver never worked. At some level perhaps it did because test page's that I printed would never come out, until I rebooted then they would all come on out. The foomatic 7150 driver was never offered to me but I tried it and it seems to work although I don't think faxing does. And scanning still seems fine. For this to work it was necessary to install via HPLIP. I have hplip running on Mandriva 2009, Fedora 9 and Fedora 10. I get the full range of services there. I don't know why we have this strange situation on CentOS. The HP website says it is tested against CentOS 5, yet the problems seem to be down to not being able to find packages that are definitely installed, and installed by totally standard yum :-( Anyway, as I said, it's not essential for me to have it on that box. It spends most of its life just quietly serving up mail and docs. Basic print ability is all it needs. Anne -- New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org Just found a cool new feature? Add it to UserBase signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] hplip problems - configure: error: cannot find libjpeg support
Anne Wilson wrote: I have hplip running on Mandriva 2009, Fedora 9 and Fedora 10. I get the full range of services there. I don't know why we have this strange situation on CentOS. The HP website says it is tested against CentOS 5, yet the problems seem to be down to not being able to find packages that are definitely installed, and installed by totally standard yum :-( The usual problem when a build procedure complains that a package is missing when you actually have it installed is that you need the matching -devel package. The base package just provides the execution libraries. You need the development package in order to build new programs that use those libraries. -- Bob Nichols NOSPAM is really part of my email address. Do NOT delete it. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] hplip problems - configure: error: cannot find libjpeg support
Robert Nichols wrote: Anne Wilson wrote: I have hplip running on Mandriva 2009, Fedora 9 and Fedora 10. I get the full range of services there. I don't know why we have this strange situation on CentOS. The HP website says it is tested against CentOS 5, yet the problems seem to be down to not being able to find packages that are definitely installed, and installed by totally standard yum :-( The usual problem when a build procedure complains that a package is missing when you actually have it installed is that you need the matching -devel package. The base package just provides the execution libraries. You need the development package in order to build new programs that use those libraries. The point remains, IMHO, that the building and installation of HPLIP should fail if packages that it needs are not there. roger wells -- Roger Wells, P.E. SAIC 221 Third St Newport, RI 02840 401-847-4210 (voice) 401-849-1585 (fax) roger.k.we...@saic.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] hplip problems - configure: error: cannot find libjpeg support
On Monday 16 March 2009 19:30:17 Robert Nichols wrote: Anne Wilson wrote: I have hplip running on Mandriva 2009, Fedora 9 and Fedora 10. I get the full range of services there. I don't know why we have this strange situation on CentOS. The HP website says it is tested against CentOS 5, yet the problems seem to be down to not being able to find packages that are definitely installed, and installed by totally standard yum :-( The usual problem when a build procedure complains that a package is missing when you actually have it installed is that you need the matching -devel package. The base package just provides the execution libraries. You need the development package in order to build new programs that use those libraries. Yes, I understand that. I did forget, at the beginning, but that problem was resolved a week or more ago. All the packages that needed -devel packages got them installed. If I had had more time to spend on it, it might have been possible to track down why it failed to find the package. The actuall error was Checking for dependency: DBus - Message bus system... error: NOT FOUND! This is a REQUIRED dependency. Please make sure that this dependency is installed before installing or running HPLIP. I might have another play with this setup when things are less busy. Anne -- New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org Just found a cool new feature? Add it to UserBase signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Correct way to provide kernel patch
I work with a USB device that is intercepted by the USB HID driver. In order to stop this behavior, the device needs to be added to the HID blacklist (hid-core.c) and a custom kernel needs to be compiled. If I create a CentOS specific patch, it appears I need to create the patch against an already patched source tree (i.e. after running rpmbuild -bp) because other patches exist that add items to the blacklist that would break my diff patch. Seems like this would be a never ending battle as new patches get added to new kernels. What's the correct way to get this device added to the kernel? Do I submit my patch to the CentOS dev team, to the kernel.org folks, or both? What's the timeline (if accepted) to actually seeing this in a production kernel? On the CentOS kernel build how-to, the kABI fixes won't make it into CentOS until 5.4, and 5.3 hasn't been released yet. Thanks in advance... Regards, Chris ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.com wrote: The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the webmaster should happen to read this... I know it is working for everyone else. Below is the traceroute. The very slow connection is due to us going over satellite (or via submarine cable?), from Colombia into Miami. I suspect there is a router down or some other problem they will eventually discover? I can load pages from foxnews.com mobile-review.com youtube.com and my 2 sites on servers in CT, without any problems. [la...@dell2400 ~]$ traceroute centos.org traceroute to centos.org (72.232.194.162), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 ipcop233 (192.168.10.1) 0.387 ms 0.370 ms 0.394 ms 2 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 1.289 ms 1.301 ms 1.525 ms 3 dsl-emcali-190.1.240.1.emcali.net.co (190.1.240.1) 18.124 ms 27.454 ms 28.734 ms 4 172.16.1.3 (172.16.1.3) 22.938 ms 16.108 ms 21.446 ms 5 190.90.2.25 (190.90.2.25) 63.484 ms 64.420 ms 63.804 ms 6 so-4-2-3-nmi-core01.nwnnetwork.net (63.245.40.157) 123.859 ms 124.120 ms 181.105 ms 7 ge-1-1-0-nmi-core02.columbus-networks.com (63.245.5.0) 136.454 ms 137.090 ms 137.423 ms 8 * * * 9 * * * 10 ae-2.ebr1.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.140.133) 144.717 ms 109.365 ms 107.428 ms 11 ae-71-71.csw2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.136.126) 113.921 ms ae-81-81.csw3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.136.130) 103.768 ms ae-91-91.csw4.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.136.134) 112.911 ms 12 ae-22-79.car2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.68.19.68) 107.676 ms ae-42-99.car2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.68.19.196) 107.077 ms ae-32-89.car2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.68.19.132) 107.756 ms 13 DATABANK-HO.car2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.71.170.2) 108.020 ms 108.180 ms 125.328 ms 14 aw_cw_10g.databank.com (63.164.96.54) 125.352 ms ae_cw_10g.databank.com (63.164.96.62) 125.568 ms 123.029 ms 15 pod22c_ae.layeredtech.com (63.164.96.202) 126.035 ms pod22a_aw.layeredtech.com (63.164.96.242) 126.307 ms pod22c_ae.layeredtech.com (63.164.96.202) 126.186 ms 16 162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com (72.232.194.162) 128.613 ms !X 128.493 ms !X 129.024 ms !X [la...@dell2400 ~]$ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding
Lanny Marcus wrote: On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.com wrote: The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the webmaster should happen to read this... I know it is working for everyone else. Below is the traceroute. The very slow connection is due to us going over satellite (or via submarine cable?), from Colombia into Miami. its not satellite, or there'd be a hop in the middle that added about 500mS to all further points. speed of light up to geostationary orbit (about 22800 miles, +/- based on the lat/long of the earth stations, and the longitude of the satellite)) and back twice, kinda hard to beat that, and the main reason satellite internet isn't very popular. *per google, (22800 miles * 4) / c = 489.58 milliseconds* (* 4 because your packets woudl go up to orbit and back down, then the response has to go up and back again.) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 4:36 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: Lanny Marcus wrote: On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.com wrote: The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the webmaster should happen to read this... I know it is working for everyone else. Below is the traceroute. The very slow connection is due to us going over satellite (or via submarine cable?), from Colombia into Miami. its not satellite, or there'd be a hop in the middle that added about 500mS to all further points. speed of light up to geostationary orbit (about 22800 miles, +/- based on the lat/long of the earth stations, and the longitude of the satellite)) and back twice, kinda hard to beat that, and the main reason satellite internet isn't very popular. *per google, (22800 miles * 4) / c = 489.58 milliseconds* (* 4 because your packets woudl go up to orbit and back down, then the response has to go up and back again.) That's good to know. I seem to recall, years ago, they were installing a Submarine cable to the USA. Do you see anything in the traceroute that shows where the problem is? It still won't load for me. I can see when it does the DNS lookup and after that the browser status is Waiting for www.centos.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Firefox seg faults
Hi, I have two very similar AMD based work stations running fully current CentOS x86_64. Both have 4Gb of RAM, both have [rkam...@media ~]$ sudo rpm -qa |grep flash flash-plugin-10.0.22.87-release.i386 [rkam...@media ~]$ sudo rpm -qa |grep fire firefox-3.0.6-1.el5.centos.i386 One machine (home) works fine on my web page www.ndgonline.net/ndg/ the other (work) seg faults - I guess it is due to the godaddy link on the bottom of the page, as plain old google loads fine. I started this debacle by removing firefox, flash and the plugin directories on my work machine under /usr/lib/mozilla and /usr/lib64/mozilla as my page loads were very slow (only the godaddy bit) and also any video content (flash based I think) failed to play, yet all this works fine on the home machine. I guess there is some common lib somewhere that is corrupt, any ideas of where to start looking? I did have nspluginwrapper installed on the work machine, however this is no longer installed and is not installed on the home machine. Do not see what this provides, as I have more success playing multimedia content at home than at work.. Heading away from the work machine, thus ability to check if any changes work will be limited until I am in front of the screens tomorrow, however I can ssh and check packages etc. Thanks for your help. Rob begin:vcard fn:Rob Kampen n:Kampen;Rob email;internet:r...@kampensonline.net tel;cell:407-341-3815 version:2.1 end:vcard ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 17:04 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 4:36 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: Lanny Marcus wrote: On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.com wrote: The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the webmaster should happen to read this... I know it is working for everyone else. Below is the traceroute. The very slow connection is due to us going over satellite (or via submarine cable?), from Colombia into Miami. --- Something fishey going on here! You can send an email to @centos.org but not www?? Dump all your browser cache out. Appears the traceroute made it. JohnStanley ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding
Lanny Marcus wrote: That's good to know. I seem to recall, years ago, they were installing a Submarine cable to the USA. Do you see anything in the traceroute that shows where the problem is? It still won't load for me. I can see when it does the DNS lookup and after that the browser status is Waiting for www.centos.org not really. FWIW, here's -my- traceroute from somewhere in northern california to the server... $ traceroute www.centos.org traceroute to www.centos.org (72.232.194.162), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 ge-0-0-1-414.er2.sjc1.got.net (207.111.214.242) 3.254 ms 3.159 ms 3.131 ms 2 ge-1-0-10.cr1.sjc1.got.net (207.111.208.49) 27.850 ms 28.121 ms 28.106 ms 3 173.ge-1-3-0.mpr1.sjc2.us.above.net (64.124.193.34) 4.266 ms 4.264 ms 4.245 ms 4 xe-1-1-0.er1.sjc7.us.above.net (64.125.27.89) 4.226 ms 4.208 ms 4.185 ms 5 above-level3.sjc7.us.above.net (64.125.13.242) 19.989 ms 19.988 ms 19.968 ms 6 vlan99.csw4.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.68.18.254) 13.772 ms vlan79.csw2.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.68.18.126) 16.030 ms vlan99.csw4.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.68.18.254) 4.494 ms 7 ae-83-83.ebr3.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.69.134.233) 12.551 ms ae-63-63.ebr3.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.69.134.225) 12.524 ms ae-83-83.ebr3.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.69.134.233) 12.477 ms 8 ae-2.ebr3.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.132.10) 21.245 ms 21.348 ms 21.159 ms 9 ae-73-73.csw2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.137.38) 24.868 ms ae-63-63.csw1.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.137.34) 12.927 ms ae-83-83.csw3.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.137.42) 21.287 ms 10 ae-82-82.ebr2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.137.25) 22.462 ms ae-72-72.ebr2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.137.21) 22.445 ms ae-62-62.ebr2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.137.17) 22.431 ms 11 * * ae-3.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.132.78) 46.555 ms 12 ae-83-83.csw3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.136.162) 60.050 ms ae-63-63.csw1.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.136.154) 52.497 ms ae-83-83.csw3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.136.162) 60.547 ms 13 ae-42-99.car2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.68.19.196) 47.712 ms ae-32-89.car2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.68.19.132) 48.047 ms 46.451 ms 14 DATABANK-HO.car2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.71.170.2) 47.981 ms 47.943 ms 47.939 ms 15 aw_cw_10g.databank.com (63.164.96.54) 46.343 ms 46.067 ms ae_cw_10g.databank.com (63.164.96.62) 46.301 ms 16 pod22e_aw.layeredtech.com (63.164.96.178) 48.343 ms pod22c_ae.layeredtech.com (63.164.96.202) 48.309 ms pod22a_aw.layeredtech.com (63.164.96.242) 48.306 ms 17 162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com (72.232.194.162) 48.485 ms !X 49.041 ms !X 48.281 ms !X and when I run this from a different norcal ISP, $ traceroute -I www.centos.org traceroute to www.centos.org (72.232.194.162), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets 1 75-101-82-1.static.dsltransport.net (75.101.82.1) 8.628 ms 8.502 ms 8.819 ms 2 128.at-X-X-X.gw3.200p-sf.sonic.net (208.106.96.201) 8.833 ms 9.038 ms 9.060 ms 3 0.as0.gw4.200p-sf.sonic.net (64.142.0.226) 8.844 ms 9.040 ms 8.797 ms 4 ge-6-22.car1.SanFrancisco1.Level3.net (4.53.128.97) 9.374 ms 9.272 ms 9.305 ms 5 ae-2-4.bar1.SanFrancisco1.Level3.net (4.69.133.150) 9.855 ms 9.420 ms 9.792 ms 6 ae-0-11.bar2.SanFrancisco1.Level3.net (4.69.140.146) 9.347 ms 9.462 ms 8.821 ms 7 ae-6-6.ebr2.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.69.140.154) 17.496 ms 16.811 ms 17.672 ms 8 ae-72-72.csw2.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.69.134.214) 18.713 ms 22.376 ms 17.419 ms 9 ae-73-73.ebr3.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.69.134.229) 22.111 ms 22.142 ms 17.930 ms 10 ae-2.ebr3.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.132.10) 18.421 ms 18.059 ms 17.632 ms 11 ae-73-73.csw2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.137.38) 25.817 ms 18.322 ms 18.100 ms 12 ae-72-72.ebr2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.137.21) 20.676 ms 18.322 ms 18.452 ms 13 ae-3.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.132.78) 57.892 ms 53.068 ms 53.730 ms 14 ae-93-93.csw4.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.136.166) 54.260 ms 52.844 ms 53.874 ms 15 ae-42-99.car2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.68.19.196) 51.354 ms 51.205 ms 50.922 ms 16 DATABANK-HO.car2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.71.170.2) 50.216 ms 50.984 ms 50.895 ms 17 aw_cw_10g.databank.com (63.164.96.54) 51.217 ms 50.102 ms 51.184 ms 18 pod22a_aw.layeredtech.com (63.164.96.242) 50.703 ms 50.165 ms 50.450 ms 19 * * * 20 162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com (72.232.194.162) 51.661 ms 50.419 ms 50.880 ms ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 7:50 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: Lanny Marcus wrote: [...] 17 162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com (72.232.194.162) 48.485 ms !X 49.041 ms !X 48.281 ms !X As man traceroute states, !X is communication administratively prohibited... I think they're blocking you somehow... -- Marcelo ¿No será acaso que ésta vida moderna está teniendo más de moderna que de vida? (Mafalda) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Marcelo Roccasalva marcelo-cen...@irrigacion.gov.ar wrote: On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 7:50 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: Lanny Marcus wrote: [...] 17 162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com (72.232.194.162) 48.485 ms !X 49.041 ms !X 48.281 ms !X As man traceroute states, !X is communication administratively prohibited... I think they're blocking you somehow... 16 162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com (72.232.194.162) 136.603 ms !X 136.185 ms !X 133.898 ms !X Marcelo: That is *very* interesting. ¡Gracias! This is probably the first time in a week or two that I have tried to surf CentOS.org and I've *never* had this problem before. If they are now blocking me, because my IP address is in Colombia, I have no idea why they would do that. That's the last hop in the traceroute to centos.org I wonder if that is something layeredtech.com took it upon themselves to implement against those of us in Colombia? Lanny ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:45 PM, JohnS jse...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 17:04 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 4:36 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: Lanny Marcus wrote: On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.com wrote: The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the webmaster should happen to read this... I know it is working for everyone else. Below is the traceroute. The very slow connection is due to us going over satellite (or via submarine cable?), from Colombia into Miami. --- Something fishey going on here! You can send an email to @centos.org but not www?? Dump all your browser cache out. Appears the traceroute made it. John: I think Marcelo in Argentina hit the nail on the head. Apparently, either layeredtech in Dallas or CentOS is now blocking the IP I am using today, or has begun blocking all IP addresses from Colombia, so I cannot get to the centos web site anymore. Firefox Cache is cleared, automatically, each time I close the browser. We do not pay extra for a Dedicated IP from our ISP, so I am starting to wonder if the one we are using today has been blocked by layeredtech. Or, all of them... Lanny ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.comwrote: On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:45 PM, JohnS jse...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 17:04 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 4:36 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: Lanny Marcus wrote: On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.com wrote: The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the webmaster should happen to read this... I know it is working for everyone else. Below is the traceroute. The very slow connection is due to us going over satellite (or via submarine cable?), from Colombia into Miami. --- Something fishey going on here! You can send an email to @centos.org but not www?? Dump all your browser cache out. Appears the traceroute made it. John: I think Marcelo in Argentina hit the nail on the head. Apparently, either layeredtech in Dallas or CentOS is now blocking the IP I am using today, or has begun blocking all IP addresses from Colombia, so I cannot get to the centos web site anymore. Firefox Cache is cleared, automatically, each time I close the browser. We do not pay extra for a Dedicated IP from our ISP, so I am starting to wonder if the one we are using today has been blocked by layeredtech. Or, all of them... Lanny ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Try restarting your router/modem in order to adquire a new IP address from the ISP's pool. maybe that could work -- It is human nature to think wisely and act in an absurd fashion. Todo el desorden del mundo proviene de las profesiones mal o mediocremente servidas ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:50 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: Lanny Marcus wrote: That's good to know. I seem to recall, years ago, they were installing a Submarine cable to the USA. Do you see anything in the traceroute that shows where the problem is? It still won't load for me. I can see when it does the DNS lookup and after that the browser status is Waiting for www.centos.org not really. FWIW, here's -my- traceroute from somewhere in northern california to the server... From San Jose you are also going into layeredtech via level3 as I am, once I get to Miami. Rick wrote me, off list, to try traceroute with -T and here's what I got: [r...@dell2400 ~]# traceroute -T centos.org traceroute to centos.org (72.232.194.162), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 ipcop233 (192.168.10.1) 0.608 ms 0.533 ms 0.534 ms 2 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 1.596 ms 2.022 ms 1.117 ms 3 162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com (72.232.194.162) 102.337 ms 101.890 ms 20.552 ms [r...@dell2400 ~] Had a suggestion I try to get a different IP from our ISP and if my wife isn't surfing now, I will try that.. Until today, I have only run into one (1) web site that won't let me on, because my IP is in Colombia. CentOS possibly has become the 2nd one. I hope not! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding
2009/3/16 Victor Padro vpa...@gmail.com: On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.com snip The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the webmaster should happen to read this... I know it is working for everyone else. Below is the traceroute. The very slow connection is due to us going over satellite (or via submarine cable?), from Colombia into Miami. snip Try restarting your router/modem in order to adquire a new IP address from the ISP's pool. maybe that could work Yuk. That is what I did for a long time, so I could use the SMTP on our web sites. Frequently, the IP's I'd get from our ISP were listed with Spamhaus. I gave up and started using Gmail... I will try that, if my wife isn't surfing at this time. It could well be that layeredtech has blocked the IP I got this morning, from the server centos.org uses there. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding
Lanny Marcus wrote: Had a suggestion I try to get a different IP from our ISP and if my wife isn't surfing now, I will try that.. Until today, I have only run into one (1) web site that won't let me on, because my IP is in Colombia. CentOS possibly has become the 2nd one. I hope not! I did some more pinging later on from one of my servers in San Jose, California, and saw some signs of route instability at layeredwhazza where the next hop after what should have been hte next-to-last one was coming from various routers all going 'no route to destination' ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 20:09 -0300, Marcelo Roccasalva wrote: On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 7:50 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: Lanny Marcus wrote: [...] 17 162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com (72.232.194.162) 48.485 ms !X 49.041 ms !X 48.281 ms !X As man traceroute states, !X is communication administratively prohibited... I think they're blocking you somehow... That's not true or the case in fact that would be wrong. Here is my traceroute: 13 162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com (72.232.194.162) 217.811 ms !X 254.820 \ ms !X 267.841 ms !X In which the whole @centos.org domain is accessable to me! So that man page was read or understood wrong! JohnStanley ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
