Re: [CentOS] Streaming video with Centos 5.2...how to?
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Rainer Duffner wrote: > For Flash-streaming, there's Red5 (which a couple of customers are using) > > Anything else, I'd consider QSS (the commercial cousin of DSS, available > on OSX-Server, only, IIRC). > If you outgrow that, there are commercial solutions from SUN (in the > if-you-have-to-ask-it's-probably-too-expensive-for-you-anyway > department) or other vendors. > > Adobe's Flash-streaming platform is available on RHEL5 (or was that > RHEL4?), too, but last time I looked, no 64bit version was available. > (which is really a joke, these days) Thanks Thiago and Rainer. I'll look into these. Take care! *** Gilbert Sebenste (My opinions only!) ** *** ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Streaming video with Centos 5.2...how to?
Rainer Duffner wrote: > Guy Boisvert schrieb: > >> Does anybody knows something that would do using CentOS ? Any good idea >> will be appreciated ! >> >> >> > > > For Flash-streaming, there's Red5 (which a couple of customers are using) > > Anything else, I'd consider QSS (the commercial cousin of DSS, available > on OSX-Server, only, IIRC). > If you outgrow that, there are commercial solutions from SUN (in the > if-you-have-to-ask-it's-probably-too-expensive-for-you-anyway > department) or other vendors. > > Adobe's Flash-streaming platform is available on RHEL5 (or was that > RHEL4?), too, but last time I looked, no 64bit version was available. > (which is really a joke, these days) > > > > Rainer > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > If you would prefer to not do any reencoding or use any special web apps, check out the following webpage. It's got some really nice and basic tips on getting files like wmv to stream using pointer files and setting the correct mime types. http://www.spartanicus.utvinternet.ie/streaming.htm Logan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 live cd won't boot
tblader wrote: > The system is an Asus m2n-e mainboard, amd x2 6400, 8 gig of ram. > It's got and LSI 8704 ELP raid card, a couple of realtek gig nics > and SATA dvd drive. My home desktop machine is an M2N-E Mobo, and works fine with the LiveCD. [r...@chamkaur ~]# dmidecode | grep -i m2n-e Version: ASUS M2N-E SLI ACPI BIOS Revision 0801 Product Name: M2N-E SLI I dont have an LSI interface though... I've got one of these: 05:0e.0 RAID bus controller: Areca Technology Corp. ARC-1220 8-Port PCI-Express to SATA RAID Controller which also works fine. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacing my Scalix mail server
Rainer Duffner wrote: > Am 17.03.2009 um 21:19 schrieb Per Qvindesland: > > >> No as I said it does not have all the synchronizing stuff but rock >> solid >> email server, sadly Zimbra in my humble opinion not really free, but >> of >> course there is http://www.opengroupware.org/ http://www.citadel.org/ >> http://www.open-xchange.com/EN/developer/index.html and http://kolab.org >> to >> mention a few all with their own pro's and con's >> > > > All the "free" solutions depend on you spending an extra-ordinary > amount of time configuring them. > > The amount of QA needed to pull something like Zimbra off is > staggering (sometimes it's still not enough QA) > > My own mail is qmail-only - I gave-up trying to get all the > calendaring-packages running long ago. > But at work, we have Zimbra and is is really cool IMO. > It has a slick web-interface, it sync's with Outlook, Mac - and then > there is this great/horrible fat client called Zimbra Desktop... > ;-) > > > I have to admit, though, that the list-price for a small amount of > mailboxes looks not so cheap (esp. if you want Zimbra Mobile). > (How many mailboxes does the original author want to replace, actually?) > I was running the mailserver for a local organization and that was 30+ users on top of my 10+. They have gone to another site, so I am back to 10+. For now... > But still, I'm kind of fascinated by it - mostly, because it's very > openly developed and by browsing through their bugzilla and P4 > repository-webinterface, you get a good idea of what current issues > there are, what would get fixed by going to a newer version (and which > new bugs to expect). > I wish every vendor did that. > > We run it on CentOS, BTW (test/dev environment via Virtuozzo, > production on physical hardware). > > > > > Rainer > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacing my Scalix mail server
on 3-17-2009 3:53 PM Les Mikesell spake the following: > Rainer Duffner wrote: >> All the "free" solutions depend on you spending an extra-ordinary >> amount of time configuring them. > > Well, except SME server where you just add users in a web interface. > But as mentioned, it's Centos4 based unless you use the beta version and > it doesn't do network authentication out of the box so it's hard to use > more than one. On the other hand it will install on a single disk in a > way that you can easily add software mirroring later, something > difficult to do with stock Centos if it is possible at all. > Something equivalent to SME server is ClarkConnect. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] libpng and Kernel updates
Russ Lavoy wrote: > I noticed that CentOS 5.2 does not have the following updates listed in the > repository. > > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0264.html > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0333.html > > Is this something that is coming soon? > yes, they should come through shortly. One issue is that some of these updates are actually built against 5.3, so we need to make sure all of the 5.3 pkgtree's are in order before building these. Soon. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacing my Scalix mail server
> Where are these rpms? I could only find a tar file. Untar the file, a new directory will be created with the RPMS. Zimbra comes as a bundle with its own ldap server, mysql server, clamav, etc. it is difficult or impossible to "update" one of those services , you have to wait for the next zimbra release and look what has been updated. Also it uses java for some processes, you need a good server (ram,cpu ) in order to run with a good response time. Best. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacing my Scalix mail server
Rainer Duffner wrote: > > All the "free" solutions depend on you spending an extra-ordinary > amount of time configuring them. Well, except SME server where you just add users in a web interface. But as mentioned, it's Centos4 based unless you use the beta version and it doesn't do network authentication out of the box so it's hard to use more than one. On the other hand it will install on a single disk in a way that you can easily add software mirroring later, something difficult to do with stock Centos if it is possible at all. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacing my Scalix mail server
Am 17.03.2009 um 21:19 schrieb Per Qvindesland: > No as I said it does not have all the synchronizing stuff but rock > solid > email server, sadly Zimbra in my humble opinion not really free, but > of > course there is http://www.opengroupware.org/ http://www.citadel.org/ > http://www.open-xchange.com/EN/developer/index.html and http://kolab.org > to > mention a few all with their own pro's and con's All the "free" solutions depend on you spending an extra-ordinary amount of time configuring them. The amount of QA needed to pull something like Zimbra off is staggering (sometimes it's still not enough QA) My own mail is qmail-only - I gave-up trying to get all the calendaring-packages running long ago. But at work, we have Zimbra and is is really cool IMO. It has a slick web-interface, it sync's with Outlook, Mac - and then there is this great/horrible fat client called Zimbra Desktop... ;-) I have to admit, though, that the list-price for a small amount of mailboxes looks not so cheap (esp. if you want Zimbra Mobile). (How many mailboxes does the original author want to replace, actually?) But still, I'm kind of fascinated by it - mostly, because it's very openly developed and by browsing through their bugzilla and P4 repository-webinterface, you get a good idea of what current issues there are, what would get fixed by going to a newer version (and which new bugs to expect). I wish every vendor did that. We run it on CentOS, BTW (test/dev environment via Virtuozzo, production on physical hardware). Rainer ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] syslog: CPU stuck for 10s!
tblader wrote: > On 03/17/2009 02:38 PM, Martin Suehowicz wrote: > >> Try upgrading to the latest kernel. >> > > Hi, > I believe I've got the latest already: > > uname -a > Linux ofdmz.localdomain 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 16 12:03:43 EST > 2008 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux > My first guess is maybe it's a problem with irqbalance but it wouldn't explain the crashes. It's possible you have a misbehaving CPU - maybe one which is getting hot since it crashing. Bad thermo grease perhaps. Can you look at the temperatures? -- Article. VI. Clause 3 of the constitution of the United States states: "The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States." ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] syslog: CPU stuck for 10s!
On 03/17/2009 02:38 PM, Martin Suehowicz wrote: > Try upgrading to the latest kernel. Hi, I believe I've got the latest already: uname -a Linux ofdmz.localdomain 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 16 12:03:43 EST 2008 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux -- Flambeau Inc. Technology Center - Baraboo, WI Email: tbla...@flambeau.com Keyserver: http://pgp.mit.edu KeyID: 0x00E9EC2C ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacing my Scalix mail server
Well if you want to install QMT in a snap (about 30 minuts and no various scripts install) then download the full iso with centos in the bottom and really simple configuration steps from here http://qmtiso.com/ Regards Per Qvindesland On 3/17/09 9:14 PM, "Dnk" wrote: > > > > > On 17-Mar-09, at 1:07 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >> Per Qvindesland wrote: >>> If your not to picky on calendar sharing and the other sharing >>> options I can >>> really recommend Qmailtoaster http://qmailtoaster.com/, rock solid >>> piece of >>> mail server with a really good web admin interface and a second to >>> none >>> support. >>> >> >> AH yes, Daniel's qmail. But this looks like a number of separate >> pieces >> that you put together yourself. >> >> Calendaring is not important, and actually I am looking at what >> amahi.org has for my home. > > > The qmailtoaster works GREAT. Putting it together is a snap. > > The installation scrips do the bulk of the work. > > So if looking for a good email server without the calendaring, have a > look. Highly recommend the spamdyke add on. Great span option. > > >> >> >>> Regards >>> Per Qvindesland >>> >>> >>> On 3/17/09 8:24 PM, "Robert Moskowitz" wrote: >>> >>> IPv6 support >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> CentOS mailing list >>> CentOS@centos.org >>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >>> >>> >> ___ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS@centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacing my Scalix mail server
No as I said it does not have all the synchronizing stuff but rock solid email server, sadly Zimbra in my humble opinion not really free, but of course there is http://www.opengroupware.org/ http://www.citadel.org/ http://www.open-xchange.com/EN/developer/index.html and http://kolab.org to mention a few all with their own pro's and con's Regards Per Qvindesland On 3/17/09 8:56 PM, "Scott Silva" wrote: > MailScanner is like deodorant... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacing my Scalix mail server
Am 17.03.2009 um 20:58 schrieb Robert Moskowitz: > > Where are these rpms? I could only find a tar file. > The pay-version is RPM. But everything (except for the startup-script, the user it creates and possibly other small bits I'm too lazy to lookup ATM) installs under / opt/zimbra anyway. I'm not even sure the RPM helps updating/upgrading, as that is started via some shell-script. Rainer ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacing my Scalix mail server
On 17-Mar-09, at 1:07 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Per Qvindesland wrote: >> If your not to picky on calendar sharing and the other sharing >> options I can >> really recommend Qmailtoaster http://qmailtoaster.com/, rock solid >> piece of >> mail server with a really good web admin interface and a second to >> none >> support. >> > > AH yes, Daniel's qmail. But this looks like a number of separate > pieces > that you put together yourself. > > Calendaring is not important, and actually I am looking at what > amahi.org has for my home. The qmailtoaster works GREAT. Putting it together is a snap. The installation scrips do the bulk of the work. So if looking for a good email server without the calendaring, have a look. Highly recommend the spamdyke add on. Great span option. > > >> Regards >> Per Qvindesland >> >> >> On 3/17/09 8:24 PM, "Robert Moskowitz" wrote: >> >> >>> IPv6 support >>> >> >> >> ___ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS@centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> >> > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacing my Scalix mail server
Am 17.03.2009 um 20:56 schrieb Scott Silva: > on 3-17-2009 12:44 PM Per Qvindesland spake the following: >> If your not to picky on calendar sharing and the other sharing >> options I can >> really recommend Qmailtoaster http://qmailtoaster.com/, rock solid >> piece of >> mail server with a really good web admin interface and a second to >> none >> support. >> >> Regards >> Per Qvindesland >> >> >> On 3/17/09 8:24 PM, "Robert Moskowitz" >> > > wrote: >> >>> IPv6 support > But it isn't really a Scalix replacement. It is more of an e-mail > hub with > squirrelmail. > If you do a lot of calendaring, then a pure mailserver is a bit lacking, yes. Zimbra is really recommended - but I would go for the pay-version (Network Edition). You get support, updates and a migration-path. Rainer ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacing my Scalix mail server
Per Qvindesland wrote: > If your not to picky on calendar sharing and the other sharing options I can > really recommend Qmailtoaster http://qmailtoaster.com/, rock solid piece of > mail server with a really good web admin interface and a second to none > support. > AH yes, Daniel's qmail. But this looks like a number of separate pieces that you put together yourself. Calendaring is not important, and actually I am looking at what amahi.org has for my home. > Regards > Per Qvindesland > > > On 3/17/09 8:24 PM, "Robert Moskowitz" wrote: > > >> IPv6 support >> > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacing my Scalix mail server
Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I really need to either upgrade my Scalix server or replace it. > > It has to be: > > Free > Integrated with anti-spam > IPv6 support > optional anti-virus (processing concerns) > > I don't have to be able to port mail from the Scalix to the new server. > Everyone can just POP their mail. > > > I have read a bit about Zimbra, it comes as a tar for rhel 5. No rpm > that I can find. > > > I also found SME, I have a LOT of questions about it, and am asking on > their forum board. > > > Anything else out there I should look for? > Depending on your needs (imap/web access/calendar sharing/etc ...) there are quite some alternatives. Dovecot/[postfix/sendmail] combination does a great job. If you need groupware features, i've tested recently Zarafa (http://www.zarafa.com) that recently released their product under GPL (not the M$ outlook connector though) .. worth trying -- -- Fabian Arrotin idea=`grep -i clue /dev/brain` test -z "$idea" && echo "sorry, init 6 in progress" || sh ./answer.sh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacing my Scalix mail server
Tim Nelson wrote: > - "Robert Moskowitz" wrote: > >> I really need to either upgrade my Scalix server or replace it. >> >> It has to be: >> >> Free >> Integrated with anti-spam >> IPv6 support >> optional anti-virus (processing concerns) >> >> I don't have to be able to port mail from the Scalix to the new >> server. >> Everyone can just POP their mail. >> >> >> I have read a bit about Zimbra, it comes as a tar for rhel 5. No rpm >> that I can find. >> >> >> I also found SME, I have a LOT of questions about it, and am asking on >> >> their forum board. >> >> >> Anything else out there I should look for? >> > > Zimbra is fantastic and is easily installed on CentOS 5 by using the provided > RHEL5 RPMs. Where are these rpms? I could only find a tar file. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacing my Scalix mail server
on 3-17-2009 12:44 PM Per Qvindesland spake the following: > If your not to picky on calendar sharing and the other sharing options I can > really recommend Qmailtoaster http://qmailtoaster.com/, rock solid piece of > mail server with a really good web admin interface and a second to none > support. > > Regards > Per Qvindesland > > > On 3/17/09 8:24 PM, "Robert Moskowitz" > wrote: > >> IPv6 support But it isn't really a Scalix replacement. It is more of an e-mail hub with squirrelmail. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacing my Scalix mail server
If your not to picky on calendar sharing and the other sharing options I can really recommend Qmailtoaster http://qmailtoaster.com/, rock solid piece of mail server with a really good web admin interface and a second to none support. Regards Per Qvindesland On 3/17/09 8:24 PM, "Robert Moskowitz" wrote: > IPv6 support ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] syslog: CPU stuck for 10s!
Try upgrading to the latest kernel. -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of tblader Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 9:05 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: [CentOS] syslog: CPU stuck for 10s! Hi All, I have a Centos 5 box serving NFS3 shares from an LSI megaraid card. The box has been up and down for about a week and trying to figure out what's up. Found a syslog message today about "APIC error on CPU" and after rebooting with NOAPIC, I now get this: # cat /var/log/kernel | grep BUG Mar 17 09:51:05 ofdmz kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 10s! [migration/0:2] Mar 17 09:52:21 ofdmz kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 10s! [ssh:3491] Anyone know what this means? I found a thread* from 2006 on this list that mentions updating the bios, but thought I would get a message out early in case this doesn't fix it. Thanks [*] - http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2006-June/023933.html ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacing my Scalix mail server
- "Robert Moskowitz" wrote: > I really need to either upgrade my Scalix server or replace it. > > It has to be: > > Free > Integrated with anti-spam > IPv6 support > optional anti-virus (processing concerns) > > I don't have to be able to port mail from the Scalix to the new > server. > Everyone can just POP their mail. > > > I have read a bit about Zimbra, it comes as a tar for rhel 5. No rpm > that I can find. > > > I also found SME, I have a LOT of questions about it, and am asking on > > their forum board. > > > Anything else out there I should look for? Zimbra is fantastic and is easily installed on CentOS 5 by using the provided RHEL5 RPMs. Tim Nelson Systems/Network Support Rockbochs Inc. (218)727-4332 x105 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Replacing my Scalix mail server
I really need to either upgrade my Scalix server or replace it. It has to be: Free Integrated with anti-spam IPv6 support optional anti-virus (processing concerns) I don't have to be able to port mail from the Scalix to the new server. Everyone can just POP their mail. I have read a bit about Zimbra, it comes as a tar for rhel 5. No rpm that I can find. I also found SME, I have a LOT of questions about it, and am asking on their forum board. Anything else out there I should look for? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED] Re: OT: centos.org web site not responding
2009/3/17 Tru Huynh : > On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 09:36:28AM -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: >> They did. I can load the web pages from centos.org again. :-) Thanks >> to everyone on the list who helped and also to the person at Layered >> Tech who eliminated the glitch! > > > ... > It looks like there may be a probelm with an offsite (non LT) router. I will > have networking investigate and get back to you as soon as possible. > ... > > > Then a few minutes later :) http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Streaming video with Centos 5.2...how to?
Guy Boisvert schrieb: > > Does anybody knows something that would do using CentOS ? Any good idea > will be appreciated ! > > For Flash-streaming, there's Red5 (which a couple of customers are using) Anything else, I'd consider QSS (the commercial cousin of DSS, available on OSX-Server, only, IIRC). If you outgrow that, there are commercial solutions from SUN (in the if-you-have-to-ask-it's-probably-too-expensive-for-you-anyway department) or other vendors. Adobe's Flash-streaming platform is available on RHEL5 (or was that RHEL4?), too, but last time I looked, no 64bit version was available. (which is really a joke, these days) Rainer ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] How to get usb storage under /media in runlevel 3?
Hello I have previously used Centos 4.x in runlevel 3, when I plug in my usb storage device/cd in cd-rom, it is shown under /media, for example /media/MyUsbStick. Now in Centos 5.2, when I insert usb storage device, nothing is shown under /media (runlevel 3). When I have runlevel 5 and X running, usb stick / cdrom is automounted fine. I can mount the stick using /dev/xxx device, but would prefer if: a) cdrom and usb-stick would appear under /media automatically and I could manually mount it b) cdrom and usb-stick would be automounted when inserted (like in runlevel 5). Any ideas, how to accomplish (a) or (b)? Regards, Kimmo Koivisto ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firefox seg faults
William L. Maltby wrote: On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 12:30 -0400, Rob Kampen wrote: Update: removed firefox and flash via yumex. removed the ~/.mozilla folder completely and started afresh. re-installed firefox - i386 version on a x86_64 system as this seem to be the safest and it works fine at home. all appears okay - particularly my web site https://www.ndgonline.net/ndg/ then installed the adobe supplied flash player and it seg faults as it goes to render the godaddy logo at the bottom of my page. remove the flash player and all is well - so it appears that the flash player is the problem... anyone else have this issue or any experience or insight they can share?? I don't know if this helps, but since you didn't give any specifics, I'm hoping that thgis will help you. $ rpm -qa|grep flash flash-plugin-10.0.22.87-release.i386 $ cat /etc/yum.repos.d/adobe-linux-i386.repo [adobe-linux-i386] name=Adobe Systems Incorporated baseurl=http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/linux/i386/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=1 priority=5 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-adobe-linux I'm not 64 bit, but this works fine for me. HTH Thanks William, I have exactly the same setup and versions - only diff is I'm on AMD running 64 bit, but have never had problems until now. As mentioned I have an almost identical system at home and it is fine. Also, this was working up to about a week ago, so I guess I need to check my logs and see what has been added that may be causing this. Rob begin:vcard fn:Rob Kampen n:Kampen;Rob email;internet:r...@kampensonline.net tel;cell:407-341-3815 version:2.1 end:vcard ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firefox seg faults
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 12:30 -0400, Rob Kampen wrote: > P.S. $ rpm -qa|grep fire firefox-3.0.6-1.el5.centos.i386 -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 49, Issue 6
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ...@centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-ow...@centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2009:0358 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 evolution - security update (Tru Huynh) 2. CESA-2009:0358 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64 evolution - security update (Tru Huynh) 3. CESA-2009:0344 Moderate CentOS 4 ia64 libsoup - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 4. CESA-2009:0344 Moderate CentOS 4 s390(x) libsoup - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) -- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:02:02 +0100 From: Tru Huynh Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0358 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 evolution - security update To: centos-annou...@centos.org Message-ID: <20090317090202.ga4...@sillage.bis.pasteur.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:0358 evolution security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0358.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/evolution-1.4.5-25.el3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/evolution-devel-1.4.5-25.el3.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/evolution-1.4.5-25.el3.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 i386 installations by running the command: yum update evolution Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090317/e24d3120/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 2 Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:02:33 +0100 From: Tru Huynh Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0358 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64 evolution - security update To: centos-annou...@centos.org Message-ID: <20090317090233.gb4...@sillage.bis.pasteur.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:0358 evolution security update for CentOS 3 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0358.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/evolution-1.4.5-25.el3.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/evolution-devel-1.4.5-25.el3.x86_64.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/evolution-1.4.5-25.el3.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 x86_64 installations by running the command: yum update evolution Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090317/e60ef98c/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 3 Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:06:10 +0200 From: Pasi Pirhonen Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0344 Moderate CentOS 4 ia64 libsoup - security update To: centos-annou...@centos.org Message-ID: <20090317160610.gn23...@centos.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:0344 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0344.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/evolution28-libsoup-2.2.98-5.el4.1.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/evolution28-libsoup-devel-2.2.98-5.el4.1.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/libsoup-2.2.1-4.el4.1.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/libsoup-devel-2.2.1-4.el4.1.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - u...@iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090317/9f95e51f/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 4 Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:28:40 +0200 From: Pasi Pirhonen Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0344 Moderate CentOS 4 s390(x) libsoup - security update To: centos-annou...@centos.org Message-ID: <20090317162840.go23...@centos.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; ch
Re: [CentOS] Firefox seg faults
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 12:30 -0400, Rob Kampen wrote: > > Update: > removed firefox and flash via yumex. > removed the ~/.mozilla folder completely and started afresh. > re-installed firefox - i386 version on a x86_64 system as this seem to > be the safest and it works fine at home. > all appears okay - particularly my web site https://www.ndgonline.net/ndg/ > then installed the adobe supplied flash player and it seg faults as it > goes to render the godaddy logo at the bottom of my page. > remove the flash player and all is well - so it appears that the flash > player is the problem... > anyone else have this issue or any experience or insight they can share?? I don't know if this helps, but since you didn't give any specifics, I'm hoping that thgis will help you. $ rpm -qa|grep flash flash-plugin-10.0.22.87-release.i386 $ cat /etc/yum.repos.d/adobe-linux-i386.repo [adobe-linux-i386] name=Adobe Systems Incorporated baseurl=http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/linux/i386/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=1 priority=5 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-adobe-linux I'm not 64 bit, but this works fine for me. > HTH -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Streaming video with Centos 5.2...how to?
Thiago Avelino wrote: > VLS = http://www.videolan.org/doc/streaming-howto/en/ > > 2009/3/17 Gilbert Sebenste : >> Hello all, >> >> I am a noob to streaming video, and I have a file I'd like to stream (a >> .wmv file...sorry. ;-) ). In any case, how can I do this on my website >> using Centos 5.2 and Apache 2.2.8, rather than making people download a >> 20 MB video? Can someone point me to some URL's and some software? >> >> Thanks for any help, I greatly appreciate it! >> >> Gilbert Thiago, i'm asking you kindly to refrain from top posting! Thanks! http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=16 http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html For the OP, do you want live streaming or on demand? For On Demand, we use Darwin Streaming Server (Open Source) on CentOS. We encode/re-encode our files in MP4. The server is able to stream MP3 too. For Live streaming, we use (alas..) Winblows WME (Winblows2003). We take our live feed in SDI and feed it into an Osprey 560 card. For me, i'd like to go further and replace the WME server by something that would run on CentOS. Presently, we push 4 streams: 1 low res, 1 medium res, 1 High res and 1 audio only. The problem we have (apart from being Winblows...) is that the damn Micro$loth stuff is a nightmare to administer. No remote status, binary logs, etc! I checked VLC and it is a very good piece of software but i'm not sure it would fit the bill in the above scenario. I'd like to have statistics, remote control, SNMP trap in case of problem, etc. As for compression, we need something easy for our clients that are just standard users with about no computer knowledge. That means that the stream should use a format that is supported right out of the box or easily added. Unfortunately, majority of clients are using Winblows... I heard about Flash Streaming but still didn't find anything that would run on Linux (as a streaming server). Does anybody knows something that would do using CentOS ? Any good idea will be appreciated ! Thanks! Guy Boisvert, ing. IngTegration inc. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Linuxtag 2009
Chris Geldenhuis wrote: > Ralph Angenendt wrote: > > It is this time of year again: CentOS is going to Linuxtag 2009 (well, > > at least we will try to get a booth there). If you want to be part of > > the team there, stay tuned for news here in centos-pr...@centos.org. > > As it happens I have a trip to Europe planned that will allow me to > attend Linuxtag. I would be happy to help if there is anything I can do > on the CentOs stand (if there is one). Fine. Please join the centos-promo list (very low traffic normally), because that is where meetings and fairs are discussed. Thank you for your initiative. Ralph pgpnZ2Bzakl55.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firefox seg faults
Rob Kampen wrote: Hi, I have two very similar AMD based work stations running fully current CentOS x86_64. Both have 4Gb of RAM, both have [rkam...@media ~]$ sudo rpm -qa |grep flash flash-plugin-10.0.22.87-release.i386 [rkam...@media ~]$ sudo rpm -qa |grep fire firefox-3.0.6-1.el5.centos.i386 One machine (home) works fine on my web page www.ndgonline.net/ndg/ the other (work) seg faults - I guess it is due to the godaddy link on the bottom of the page, as plain old google loads fine. I started this debacle by removing firefox, flash and the plugin directories on my work machine under /usr/lib/mozilla and /usr/lib64/mozilla as my page loads were very slow (only the godaddy bit) and also any video content (flash based I think) failed to play, yet all this works fine on the home machine. I guess there is some common lib somewhere that is corrupt, any ideas of where to start looking? I did have nspluginwrapper installed on the work machine, however this is no longer installed and is not installed on the home machine. Do not see what this provides, as I have more success playing multimedia content at home than at work.. Heading away from the work machine, thus ability to check if any changes work will be limited until I am in front of the screens tomorrow, however I can ssh and check packages etc. Thanks for your help. Rob Update: removed firefox and flash via yumex. removed the ~/.mozilla folder completely and started afresh. re-installed firefox - i386 version on a x86_64 system as this seem to be the safest and it works fine at home. all appears okay - particularly my web site https://www.ndgonline.net/ndg/ then installed the adobe supplied flash player and it seg faults as it goes to render the godaddy logo at the bottom of my page. remove the flash player and all is well - so it appears that the flash player is the problem... anyone else have this issue or any experience or insight they can share?? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos begin:vcard fn:Rob Kampen n:Kampen;Rob email;internet:r...@kampensonline.net tel;cell:407-341-3815 version:2.1 end:vcard ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Linuxtag 2009
Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Cheers. > > It is this time of year again: CentOS is going to Linuxtag 2009 (well, > at least we will try to get a booth there). If you want to be part of > the team there, stay tuned for news here in centos-pr...@centos.org. > > Deadline for the projects is 24th of march (short call!), I will try to > apply sooner than that >:) > > Cheers and thanks, > > Ralph > > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > Hi Ralph, As it happens I have a trip to Europe planned that will allow me to attend Linuxtag. I would be happy to help if there is anything I can do on the CentOs stand (if there is one). ChrisG ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 live cd won't boot
> Could you please provide a description of the components in the system > you are trying to boot it in? > Do you have at least 256-512 MB of RAM? Hi, The CD/DVD image was downloaded from mirrors.gigenet: http://mirrors.gigenet.com/centos/5/isos/i386/CentOS-5.2-i386-LiveCD.iso The system is an Asus m2n-e mainboard, amd x2 6400, 8 gig of ram. It's got and LSI 8704 ELP raid card, a couple of realtek gig nics and SATA dvd drive. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Streaming video with Centos 5.2...how to?
From: Thiago Avelino > VLS = http://www.videolan.org/doc/streaming-howto/en/ > 2009/3/17 Gilbert Sebenste : > > I am a noob to streaming video, and I have a file I'd like to stream (a > > .wmv file...sorry. ;-) ). In any case, how can I do this on my website > > using Centos 5.2 and Apache 2.2.8, rather than making people download a > > 20 MB video? Can someone point me to some URL's and some software? There is also ffserver from ffmpeg. Or convert the video to flv and put a flashplayer on your website... A popular one is JW FLV Media Player. JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] syslog: CPU stuck for 10s!
Hi All, I have a Centos 5 box serving NFS3 shares from an LSI megaraid card. The box has been up and down for about a week and trying to figure out what's up. Found a syslog message today about "APIC error on CPU" and after rebooting with NOAPIC, I now get this: # cat /var/log/kernel | grep BUG Mar 17 09:51:05 ofdmz kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 10s! [migration/0:2] Mar 17 09:52:21 ofdmz kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 10s! [ssh:3491] Anyone know what this means? I found a thread* from 2006 on this list that mentions updating the bios, but thought I would get a message out early in case this doesn't fix it. Thanks [*] - http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2006-June/023933.html ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Streaming video with Centos 5.2...how to?
VLS = http://www.videolan.org/doc/streaming-howto/en/ 2009/3/17 Gilbert Sebenste : > Hello all, > > I am a noob to streaming video, and I have a file I'd like to stream (a > .wmv file...sorry. ;-) ). In any case, how can I do this on my website > using Centos 5.2 and Apache 2.2.8, rather than making people download a > 20 MB video? Can someone point me to some URL's and some software? > > Thanks for any help, I greatly appreciate it! > > Gilbert > > *** > Gilbert Sebenste > (My opinions only!) ** > *** > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- att. Thiago Avelino Programador | SysAdmin Linux User: #484673 São Paulo - SP / Brasil www.avelino.us | www.centos-br.org Linkedin | linkedin.com/in/thiagoavelinoster Twitter | twitter.com/thiagoavelinost JustinTV | justin.tv/thiagoavelino ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Streaming video with Centos 5.2...how to?
Hello all, I am a noob to streaming video, and I have a file I'd like to stream (a .wmv file...sorry. ;-) ). In any case, how can I do this on my website using Centos 5.2 and Apache 2.2.8, rather than making people download a 20 MB video? Can someone point me to some URL's and some software? Thanks for any help, I greatly appreciate it! Gilbert *** Gilbert Sebenste (My opinions only!) ** *** ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] libpng and Kernel updates
2009/3/17 Russ Lavoy : > > I noticed that CentOS 5.2 does not have the following updates listed in the > repository. > > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0264.html > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0333.html > > Is this something that is coming soon? They should come in CentOS 5.3 -- George Negoita System Administrator iMedia Plus Group ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED] Re: OT: centos.org web site not responding
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 09:36:28AM -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: > They did. I can load the web pages from centos.org again. :-) Thanks > to everyone on the list who helped and also to the person at Layered > Tech who eliminated the glitch! ... It looks like there may be a probelm with an offsite (non LT) router. I will have networking investigate and get back to you as soon as possible. ... Then a few minutes later :) Dear Customer: I've read through the thread on your message boards, and don't see anything that jumps out as a problem on the traceroutes. The "Administrative block" results you are seeing are likely due to default traceroute behavior on *nix systems is to use UDP as the sending protocol. In order to prevent UDP flood attacks against our network, our routers and switches do not respond to UDP requests. The best way to run a traceroute to a server in our data centers is to force traceroute to use ICMP instead of UDP. On most *nix systems, this can be done by using the "-I" flag. In answer to other speculation on the thread, we don't block any IPs from our network as a whole. Our business is to allow you to make your server available to anyone and everyone you want to have access to it. Therefore, we only block IPs if a customer has a hardware firewall that we manage for them, and we only block it utilizing that customer's firewall and at that customer's request. Therefore, any blocks that are put in place do not affect other customers' servers. I hope this clarifies some of the issues, although it doesn't resolve the problem the user in Colombia is having reaching your site. Another test he could perform would just be to ping your server's IP and see if he gets a response -- if he does, then the routing and switching is working correctly. Thank you, Network Operations Layered Technologies -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpRSNv2tfpqe.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:29 PM, R P Herrold wrote: > On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Lanny Marcus wrote: >> The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the >> web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the >> webmaster should happen to read this... > > working fine here, and from two other test locations -- it > might make more sense to use the IRC channel for time > sensitive reports Russ: After Layered Tech eliminated the problem, I saved the web page about CentOS on IRC to my hard drive. If I ever run into something like that again, I'm prepared now Lanny ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] [SOLVED] Re: OT: centos.org web site not responding
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote: > 2009/3/17 Tru Huynh : e and that I will >>> post here and ask one of the CentOS team with Administrative >>> privileges for that server to contact them for support. >> >> I have opened a ticket pointing back to this thread at the hoster. >> >> Thanks > > Tru: THANK YOU! I wrote to Russ, off line, about 4 hours ago. My > impression is that the people at Layered Tech are very professional. > I'm sure they will eliminate this problem, ASAP. Lanny They did. I can load the web pages from centos.org again. :-) Thanks to everyone on the list who helped and also to the person at Layered Tech who eliminated the glitch! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] libpng and Kernel updates
I noticed that CentOS 5.2 does not have the following updates listed in the repository. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0264.html https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0333.html Is this something that is coming soon? Thanks! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding
2009/3/17 Tru Huynh : > On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 04:23:47AM -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Lanny Marcus >> wrote: >> >> >> Proxy Server that is anonymous. But doing another trace to layeredtech >> >> and ltdomains shows bad hops also from my end just like John Pierces >> >> shows. But still I can access it by WWW. >> >> >> I sent an email to support AT layeredtech DOT com got their auto >> responder and 5 minutes later Kevin wrote that they need the Server ID >> and Client ID. >> >> I replied to Kevin that I'm only an end user at home and that I will >> post here and ask one of the CentOS team with Administrative >> privileges for that server to contact them for support. > > I have opened a ticket pointing back to this thread at the hoster. > > Thanks Tru: THANK YOU!I wrote to Russ, off line, about 4 hours ago. My impression is that the people at Layered Tech are very professional. I'm sure they will eliminate this problem, ASAP. Lanny ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 04:23:47AM -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Lanny Marcus > wrote: > > >> Proxy Server that is anonymous. But doing another trace to layeredtech > >> and ltdomains shows bad hops also from my end just like John Pierces > >> shows. But still I can access it by WWW. > > > I sent an email to support AT layeredtech DOT com got their auto > responder and 5 minutes later Kevin wrote that they need the Server ID > and Client ID. > > I replied to Kevin that I'm only an end user at home and that I will > post here and ask one of the CentOS team with Administrative > privileges for that server to contact them for support. I have opened a ticket pointing back to this thread at the hoster. Thanks Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgp6JTBZCz52E.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 11:20 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > JohnS wrote: > > Something fishey going on here! You can send an email to @centos.org but > > not www?? > > Sure. The mailserver is nowhere near to the web server. Okay, same > continent, but completely different DC. > > Ralph Ahh, ok I see now :-) JohnStanley ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Linuxtag 2009
Cheers. It is this time of year again: CentOS is going to Linuxtag 2009 (well, at least we will try to get a booth there). If you want to be part of the team there, stay tuned for news here in centos-pr...@centos.org. Deadline for the projects is 24th of march (short call!), I will try to apply sooner than that >:) Cheers and thanks, Ralph pgpPug0Du9vZC.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding
JohnS wrote: > Something fishey going on here! You can send an email to @centos.org but > not www?? Sure. The mailserver is nowhere near to the web server. Okay, same continent, but completely different DC. Ralph pgpWxCQ2W0tYw.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote: >> Proxy Server that is anonymous. But doing another trace to layeredtech >> and ltdomains shows bad hops also from my end just like John Pierces >> shows. But still I can access it by WWW. I sent an email to support AT layeredtech DOT com got their auto responder and 5 minutes later Kevin wrote that they need the Server ID and Client ID. I replied to Kevin that I'm only an end user at home and that I will post here and ask one of the CentOS team with Administrative privileges for that server to contact them for support. Sorry for the double post(s) in this thread. gmail died a couple of times, when I was trying to send email. Thank you, to everyone who replied to this thread. Especially to the two John's, who continued pinging centos.org and discovered there is a problem, in or near the Layered Tech NOC in Dallas. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 1:05 AM, JohnS wrote: >> Lanny Marcus wrote: >> > Had a suggestion I try to get a different IP from our ISP and if my >> > wife isn't surfing now, I will try that.. Until today, I have only run >> > into one (1) web site that won't let me on, because my IP is in >> > Colombia. CentOS possibly has become the 2nd one. I hope not! > > One thing you could try is if you have a friend that lives there in > Columbia is to try and access it from there computer. They just need to > have the same Internet Service Provider. Another way would be through a > Proxy Server that is anonymous. But doing another trace to layeredtech > and ltdomains shows bad hops also from my end just like John Pierces > shows. But still I can access it by WWW. John: Thank you for also confirming there is a network connectivity problem in or near layered tech in Dallas! Much appreciated! I will try to find a free anonymous proxy service that can load the HTML pages, until they cure this glitch. I do not see on the layeredtech.com contact page an address for network connectivity problems. I am going to send an email to support AT layeredtech DOT com and hopefully that will be Forwarded to a Network Tech there who can look into what you and John Pierce found. Lanny ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 1:05 AM, JohnS wrote: >> Lanny Marcus wrote: >> > Had a suggestion I try to get a different IP from our ISP and if my >> > wife isn't surfing now, I will try that.. Until today, I have only run >> > into one (1) web site that won't let me on, because my IP is in >> > Colombia. CentOS possibly has become the 2nd one. I hope not! > > One thing you could try is if you have a friend that lives there in > Columbia is to try and access it from there computer. They just need to > have the same Internet Service Provider. Another way would be through a > Proxy Server that is anonymous. But doing another trace to layeredtech > and ltdomains shows bad hops also from my end just like John Pierces > shows. But still I can access it by WWW. John: Thank you for also confirming there is a network connectivity problem in or near layered tech in Dallas! Much appreciated! I will try to find a free anonymous proxy service that can load the HTML pages, until they cure this glitch. I do not see on the layeredtech.com contact page an address for network connectivity problems. I am going to send an email to support AT layeredtech DOT com and hopefully that will be Forwarded to a Network Tech there who can look into what you and John Pierce found. Lanny ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:40 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > Lanny Marcus wrote: >> Had a suggestion I try to get a different IP from our ISP and if my >> wife isn't surfing now, I will try that.. Until today, I have only run >> into one (1) web site that won't let me on, because my IP is in >> Colombia. CentOS possibly has become the 2nd one. I hope not! > > I did some more pinging later on from one of my servers in San Jose, > California, and saw some signs of route instability at layeredwhazza > where the next hop after what should have been hte next-to-last one was > coming from various routers all going 'no route to destination' John: Thank you for doing that additional testing! I came in here just before 3 A.M. and powered up the ADSL modem, IPCop box, etc. Probably have a different IP than I had yesterday. Still can't load pages from centos.org One thing that I noticed yesterday, when I pinged centos.org was that the ping times were varying a lot. I did not mention that yesterday. However, at this time, the ping times for centos.org from here are about the same as they are for my 2 web sites, which are on servers in different NOCs in CT. Within approximately 5 ms. I also found that the site I could not load last year is now loading, without any problem. Sounds like you found a problem they can fix and that they are not blocking IPs from Colombia.:-) Lanny ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
