Re: [CentOS] looking for alternative to SME & Clark Connect
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Victor Padro wrote: > FreeNAS/Openfiler(CentOS) can be used for file sharing and it supports RAID > also. > Openfiler uses rPath Linux http://www.openfiler.com/community They have not used CentOS for some time I think. AsteriskNOW recently switched from using rPath to CentOS when they released version 1.5. Paul ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Sendmail forwarding external email sent to root
Benjamin: Thanks for responding. I guess that facility just does not exist in sendmail. I broke down and wrote a custom jilter (Java based milter) to do it. It is actually working very well and gives me a lot of flexibility. Thanks, Neil -- Neil Aggarwal, (832)245-7314, www.JAMMConsulting.com Eliminate junk email and reclaim your inbox. Visit http://www.spammilter.com for details. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Sendmail forwarding external email sent to root
Three ideas come to mind: 1) announce a different public name than the local machine name. A) EG: machine name:donttellanyone.theservername.com public (DNS) name: www.theservername.com B) Then set up virtusertable entry routing r...@donttellanyone.theservername.come to your email address. C) edit /etc/aliases so that "root: | /dev/null " 2) start using greylisting! Milter-greylist works well w/sendmail for light- medium load machines. =) 3) Turn off inbound email on port 25, if you can. On Wednesday 15 April 2009 18:57:57 Neil Aggarwal wrote: > Hello: > > On a CentOS5 machine I set up for a client, in /etc/aliases, > I set root's mail to forward to my email address so I can > get notices from cron, etc. > > Unfortunately, I am now getting a lot of spam which is > sent to r...@theservername.com > > How can I tell sendmail to not accept external email to > root? > > I searched the Internet and found some horribly convoluted > solutions. There has to be a simple way to do this, like > putting a line in sendmail.mc or something. > > Anyone know a good solution? > > Thanks > Neil > > -- > Neil Aggarwal, (832)245-7314, www.JAMMConsulting.com > Eliminate junk email and reclaim your inbox. > Visit http://www.spammilter.com for details. > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] coolkey
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 5:39 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 4:45 PM, John R Pierce wrote: >> >>> anyone familiar with coolkey, an interface for smartcards? apparently >>> its built into centos5, but I don't seem to see it for centos4, and i >>> need to support both (actually, we have a lot more c4 systems in >>> production than 5)... >>> >>> does anyone know offhand where to find el4 RPMs for this and its related >>> packages (pcsc-lite, etc) ? >>> >>> >> >> It was added in EL5. You would need to recompile the SRPMS for the >> items in EL5 and see if they work on EL4.. I am not sure if there was >> kernel stuff needed also. >> >> > > > apparently it is part of Red Hat Certificate System, which RH claims > here ... > http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/cert-system/7.3/html/Enterprise_Security_Client_Guide/install-rhel.html > ... that it is available for v4 but refers to the RHN Directory Server > channel for the RPMs. I don't have access to that channel to check. I do see that they are an odd mix of older and newer stuff than what is in 5.3. I would try and see if a recompile of the SRPMS on a EL4 system worked. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Sendmail forwarding external email sent to root
Hello: On a CentOS5 machine I set up for a client, in /etc/aliases, I set root's mail to forward to my email address so I can get notices from cron, etc. Unfortunately, I am now getting a lot of spam which is sent to r...@theservername.com How can I tell sendmail to not accept external email to root? I searched the Internet and found some horribly convoluted solutions. There has to be a simple way to do this, like putting a line in sendmail.mc or something. Anyone know a good solution? Thanks Neil -- Neil Aggarwal, (832)245-7314, www.JAMMConsulting.com Eliminate junk email and reclaim your inbox. Visit http://www.spammilter.com for details. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] re-install package
Scott Silva wrote: > And the right repositories have to be online! Finally, a successful commercial repository. -- Sincerely, John Thomas ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] re-install package
on 4-15-2009 10:55 AM Paul Heinlein spake the following: > On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Jim Perrin wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 1:12 PM, David G. Miller >> wrote: >> Finally ! 10 years after apt :) >>> I saw a t-shirt advertised recently that said "apt-get girlfriend". >>> I'm guessing yum still can't do that ;-). >> There is a newly updated girlfriend t-shirt for yum now, if anyone would like the link. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.3 and XFS
>xfs kmod's for centos-5 have so far been done within the centos loop, >but this is interesting - looks like 5.4 might have a tech-preview for >xfs included in. I never thought of that given that they come from the plus repo. So its only a matter of time then before it appears for the 5.3 kernels... If I have time this weekend, I'll yank an srpm down from the 5.2 branch kmod and see what's involved in making this (Never done it, so I have no idea off the top of my head). When 5.4 comes out, I might end up using ext4 anyway :) Thanks for the info. jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.3 and XFS
On 04/15/2009 08:58 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > Looking at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469401 > has me a bit unsure about the kmod for 5.3's kernel, is not expected > to appear? xfs kmod's for centos-5 have so far been done within the centos loop, but this is interesting - looks like 5.4 might have a tech-preview for xfs included in. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] coolkey
Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 4:45 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > >> anyone familiar with coolkey, an interface for smartcards? apparently >> its built into centos5, but I don't seem to see it for centos4, and i >> need to support both (actually, we have a lot more c4 systems in >> production than 5)... >> >> does anyone know offhand where to find el4 RPMs for this and its related >> packages (pcsc-lite, etc) ? >> >> > > It was added in EL5. You would need to recompile the SRPMS for the > items in EL5 and see if they work on EL4.. I am not sure if there was > kernel stuff needed also. > > apparently it is part of Red Hat Certificate System, which RH claims here ... http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/cert-system/7.3/html/Enterprise_Security_Client_Guide/install-rhel.html ... that it is available for v4 but refers to the RHN Directory Server channel for the RPMs. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] coolkey
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 4:45 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > anyone familiar with coolkey, an interface for smartcards? apparently > its built into centos5, but I don't seem to see it for centos4, and i > need to support both (actually, we have a lot more c4 systems in > production than 5)... > > does anyone know offhand where to find el4 RPMs for this and its related > packages (pcsc-lite, etc) ? > It was added in EL5. You would need to recompile the SRPMS for the items in EL5 and see if they work on EL4.. I am not sure if there was kernel stuff needed also. -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] coolkey
anyone familiar with coolkey, an interface for smartcards? apparently its built into centos5, but I don't seem to see it for centos4, and i need to support both (actually, we have a lot more c4 systems in production than 5)... does anyone know offhand where to find el4 RPMs for this and its related packages (pcsc-lite, etc) ? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] rsync to full disk
Scott Silva wrote: > on 4-15-2009 1:49 PM Les Mikesell spake the following: >> MHR wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Les Mikesell >>> wrote: I recently noticed that an "rsync -av" to a full disk keeps sending files even after the target is out of space. Has it always done that? I suppose it is reasonable to keep trying in case it subsequently crosses a mount point or space becomes available but I expected it to quit on that sort of error. >>> IIRC, rsync does not stop because the files may be of different sizes, >>> and some may fit where others won't as it goes along. It doesn't sort >>> by file size and copy that way, and that might not be the best method >>> anyway >>> >> It is just kind of annoying that an "rsync -av ..." with a large tree of >> files goes on and on still listing each filename with no indication that >> all of them are failing because there is no space at all on the target. >> > It should show you the fails when it completes. Yes, but I would have preferred to fix it instead of waiting hours while it went through the motions of copying nowhere. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Can not get IP address
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Ugo Bellavance wrote: > Anand Vaddarapu a écrit : >> while installing centos 5.2 i enabled dhcp. centos machine did not get >> IP address and can not get to internet. > What is your internet connection? If it is cable modem, reset your > modem and try again. And connect to your ADSL or Cable Modem or whatever, with your web browser, and confirm that it has received an IP address from your ISP. Is your box connected directly to the Modem/Router? Or, do you have a LAN and have other boxes receiving an IP address OK from your router? We had a problem, 3 days ago, when we did not receive an IP for our ADSL and we could not get to the Internet, until they fixed their problem. Verify again that your box is set up to receive an IP address via DHCP and also that your Modem/Router is set up to receive an IP address via DHCP. You may need to do some additional configuration settings. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Can not get IP address
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Ugo Bellavance wrote: > Anand Vaddarapu a écrit : >> while installing centos 5.2 i enabled dhcp. centos machine did not get >> IP address and can not get to internet. > What is your internet connection? If it is cable modem, reset your > modem and try again. And connect to your ADSL or Cable Modem or whatever, with your web browser, and confirm that it has received an IP address from your ISP. We had a problem, 3 days ago, when we did not receive an IP for our ADSL and we could not get to the Internet, until they fixed their problem. Verify again that your box is set up to receive an IP address via DHCP and also that your Modem/Router is set up to receive an IP address via DHCP. Is your box connected directly to the Internet, via your Cable/ADSL modem? Check all of the configuration settings, in your Cable Modem or ADSL modem and also in your box. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] rsync to full disk
on 4-15-2009 1:49 PM Les Mikesell spake the following: > MHR wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Les Mikesell >> wrote: >>> I recently noticed that an "rsync -av" to a full disk keeps sending >>> files even after the target is out of space. Has it always done that? >>> I suppose it is reasonable to keep trying in case it subsequently >>> crosses a mount point or space becomes available but I expected it to >>> quit on that sort of error. >>> >> IIRC, rsync does not stop because the files may be of different sizes, >> and some may fit where others won't as it goes along. It doesn't sort >> by file size and copy that way, and that might not be the best method >> anyway >> > > It is just kind of annoying that an "rsync -av ..." with a large tree of > files goes on and on still listing each filename with no indication that > all of them are failing because there is no space at all on the target. > It should show you the fails when it completes. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] rsync to full disk
MHR wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> I recently noticed that an "rsync -av" to a full disk keeps sending >> files even after the target is out of space. Has it always done that? >> I suppose it is reasonable to keep trying in case it subsequently >> crosses a mount point or space becomes available but I expected it to >> quit on that sort of error. >> > > IIRC, rsync does not stop because the files may be of different sizes, > and some may fit where others won't as it goes along. It doesn't sort > by file size and copy that way, and that might not be the best method > anyway > It is just kind of annoying that an "rsync -av ..." with a large tree of files goes on and on still listing each filename with no indication that all of them are failing because there is no space at all on the target. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] rsync to full disk
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > I recently noticed that an "rsync -av" to a full disk keeps sending > files even after the target is out of space. Has it always done that? > I suppose it is reasonable to keep trying in case it subsequently > crosses a mount point or space becomes available but I expected it to > quit on that sort of error. > IIRC, rsync does not stop because the files may be of different sizes, and some may fit where others won't as it goes along. It doesn't sort by file size and copy that way, and that might not be the best method anyway HTH mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] 5.3 and XFS
Looking at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469401 has me a bit unsure about the kmod for 5.3's kernel, is not expected to appear? Thanks! jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Sharing RAM between VM
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Larry wrote: > Hi, all! > I have a server with 4 virtual machines ( using xen). Is there a way to > make them share RAM? I found out something about balloons, but it didn't > distribute RAM dynamically. So I decided that xen can't achieve that. > I tried luci and ricci and now all my VMs are in a cluster. But I don't > think this actually helped. > Can you suggest a software and/or manual or a question which I should > ask google for completing this task? > > All doms/nodes are with Centos 5.3(final). > > Thanks! > > > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > AFAIK, openvz can do that. Of course, openvz has its own problems, but that's another matter. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Building a kernel without kabichk
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Terry Hull wrote: > Did you get it to build with kabichk turned off? > > I had gotten older packages to build as below, but 128.1.6 was giving > errors. I can get the kernel to build with kabichk turned on with no real > problems. Also here are the kernel packages I have installed (plus the > source of course.) > > rpm -qa | grep kernel > kernel-2.6.18-92.el5 > kernel-devel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 > kernel-headers-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 > kernel-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 > kernel-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5SCST - This was the one that I built and it worked > >> >>> I have NOT installed any patches that will break KABI, but I am wanting to >>> patch the kernel for SCST, and that will do it. Currently, I¹m just trying >>> to get the beast to build. I have been successful getting this to work on >>> older versions like 2.6.18-92.1.22, but I have not had success with >>> 128.1.6. l. I have not worried about build errors at this point, because >>> I¹m hoping someone can say, ³Just do this, and all will be well.² >>> Terry: Have you applied the patch referenced in the bugzilla on the CentOS wiki: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456765 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=332650 It differs somewhat from the patches in the kabi section of the howto... i.e., changes the beginning of the %if block. Thanks Kwan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] re-install package
on 4-15-2009 10:55 AM Paul Heinlein spake the following: > On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Jim Perrin wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 1:12 PM, David G. Miller >> wrote: >> Finally ! 10 years after apt �:) >>> I saw a t-shirt advertised recently that said "apt-get girlfriend". >>> �I'm guessing yum still can't do that ;-). >> >> I haven't seen it work all that well in apt either. I'm guessing it >> requires additional resources. > > A richer, more attractive API. And the right repositories have to be online! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] re-install package
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Jim Perrin wrote: On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 1:12 PM, David G. Miller wrote: Finally ! 10 years after apt :) I saw a t-shirt advertised recently that said "apt-get girlfriend". I'm guessing yum still can't do that ;-). I haven't seen it work all that well in apt either. I'm guessing it requires additional resources. A richer, more attractive API. -- Paul Heinlein <> heinl...@madboa.com <> http://www.madboa.com/___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] re-install package
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 1:12 PM, David G. Miller wrote: >> Finally ! 10 years after apt :) > I saw a t-shirt advertised recently that said "apt-get girlfriend". I'm > guessing yum still can't do that ;-). I haven't seen it work all that well in apt either. I'm guessing it requires additional resources. -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] re-install package
Dag Wieers wrote: > On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, Erik Laxdal wrote: >> > Jerry Geis wrote: >> >>> >> I tried to install alsa 1.0.19 on centos 5.3 64 - did not work - compile >>> >> errors. >>> >> >>> >> I need to re-install alsa-lib and alsa-util . >>> >> I dont want to do rpm -e first on those packages as dependcy is crazy. >>> >> I know they were installed (rpm -qa | grep alsa tells me so) I just want >>> >> to re-install ? >>> >> How do I do that? >>> >> > >> > Try the new "reinstall" option in CentOS 5.3's version of yum: >> > >> > yum reinstall alsa-lib alsa-util >> > > Finally ! 10 years after apt :) I saw a t-shirt advertised recently that said "apt-get girlfriend". I'm guessing yum still can't do that ;-). Cheers, Dave -- Politics, n. Strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles. -- Ambrose Bierce ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] rsync to full disk
I recently noticed that an "rsync -av" to a full disk keeps sending files even after the target is out of space. Has it always done that? I suppose it is reasonable to keep trying in case it subsequently crosses a mount point or space becomes available but I expected it to quit on that sort of error. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Using cdrecord on CentOS
At Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:22:28 +0200 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Robert Heller a écrit : > > > > An audio CD is not like a data CD. It does not have a 'file system'. > > It is a collection of data tracks, containing cdda files. > > > > Yeah, I know. But then, AFAIK, dd is supposed to handle these "binary > sausages" as well. Meaning: take that input (whatever it is) and produce > output without asking what it is. > > Correct me if I'm wrong. Assumes that the device in question behaves (or can behave) as a raw sequencental block device. Audio CDs are not, strictly speaking, like a partitioned (or partitionable) hard drive. CD-Rom 'tracks' are NOT like disk partitions. ReadCD and Cdda2wav don't just to raw read() calls (which is pretty much all dd does). They do some interesting ioctl() calls specific to CD-Roms as well -- these I/O calls relate to 'seeking' to the proper track and figuring out big the track is, etc. > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 Deepwoods Software-- Download the Model Railroad System http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows hel...@deepsoft.com -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 50, Issue 9
31470f297e8 openais-0.80.3-22.el5_3.4.x86_64.rpm
d6a60923d3afd585e68ba56611378b06 openais-devel-0.80.3-22.el5_3.4.i386.rpm
32bf86105d3c13b0d77a9c40dfa6c5b8 openais-devel-0.80.3-22.el5_3.4.x86_64.rpm
Source:
b471e3171455d7bf1a3978761a72efc4 openais-0.80.3-22.el5_3.4.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:35:25 +
From: Karanbir Singh
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2009-0418 CentOS 5 i386 gfs2-utils
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20090414213525.ga1...@tantra.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009-0418
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0418.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
9723f6b1ea097f791c1f70cd6fec3730 gfs2-utils-0.1.53-1.el5_3.2.i386.rpm
Source:
73e2f54a0434386319595d9b7df3ad9b gfs2-utils-0.1.53-1.el5_3.2.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:35:25 +
From: Karanbir Singh
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2009-0418 CentOS 5 x86_64 gfs2-utils
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20090414213525.ga1...@tantra.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009-0418
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0418.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
6b7078e35244849bed5bd8cc3244f39b gfs2-utils-0.1.53-1.el5_3.2.x86_64.rpm
Source:
73e2f54a0434386319595d9b7df3ad9b gfs2-utils-0.1.53-1.el5_3.2.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:36:47 +
From: Karanbir Singh
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2009:0415 CentOS 5 i386 rgmanager
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20090414213647.ga1...@tantra.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:0415
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0415.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
6e42076a6cd7819b40bdd92eb6be59f6 rgmanager-2.0.46-1.el5.centos.3.i386.rpm
Source:
6878605051dc0dbd41b5c444fcedced8 rgmanager-2.0.46-1.el5.centos.3.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 8
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:36:47 +
From: Karanbir Singh
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2009:0415 CentOS 5 x86_64 rgmanager
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20090414213647.ga1...@tantra.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2009:0415
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0415.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
c1ae4d4e3d3436e9f935d5a2f0736cae rgmanager-2.0.46-1.el5.centos.3.x86_64.rpm
Source:
6878605051dc0dbd41b5c444fcedced8 rgmanager-2.0.46-1.el5.centos.3.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 9
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:27:36 +0200
From: Tru Huynh
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:0420 Moderate CentOS 3 i386
ghostscript - security update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20090414222736.ga10...@sillage.bis.pasteur.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:0420
ghostscript security update for CentOS 3 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0420.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
updates/i386/RPMS/ghostscript-7.05-32.1.20.i386.rpm
updates/i386/RPMS/ghostscript-devel-7.05-32.1.20.i386.rpm
updates/i386/RPMS/hpijs-1.3-32.1.20.i386.rpm
source:
updates/SRPMS/ghostscript-7.05-32.1.20.src.rpm
You may update your CentOS-3 i386 installations by running the command:
yum update ghostscript\* hpijs
Tru
--
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090415/a66e2d7f/attachment-0001.bin
-
[CentOS] IO accounting
Just a general question to CentOS users, I'm curious if there is a supported or known working kernel newer than 2.6.20 that has IO accounting support. I know I could built it from source but I'd rather use a more tested one from a repo of some variety if possible. I'm referring to this feature. http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=7c3ab7381e79dfc7db14a67c6f4f3285664e1ec2 In short this appears to have been seeked out by several people just curious if there is anyone out there that uses a nonstandard repo or source out there on their Cent server. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Using cdrecord on CentOS
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 18:22 +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote: > Robert Heller a écrit : > > > > An audio CD is not like a data CD. It does not have a 'file system'. > > It is a collection of data tracks, containing cdda files. > > > > Yeah, I know. But then, AFAIK, dd is supposed to handle these "binary > sausages" as well. Meaning: take that input (whatever it is) and produce > output without asking what it is. > > Correct me if I'm wrong. --- Try the no error option of dd see man dd. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Using cdrecord on CentOS
Robert Heller a écrit : > > An audio CD is not like a data CD. It does not have a 'file system'. > It is a collection of data tracks, containing cdda files. > Yeah, I know. But then, AFAIK, dd is supposed to handle these "binary sausages" as well. Meaning: take that input (whatever it is) and produce output without asking what it is. Correct me if I'm wrong. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] looking for alternative to SME & Clark Connect
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > Rainer Duffner wrote: > > > >> - if possible fail-over / high availability support. > >> > >> > > > > > > For free? > > ;-) > > > > > >> I need to support about 15 - 30 (some part time) students, so I would > >> like to keep the costs low. If it's free, so much better. SME works > >> for most of the stuff, but it still runs on CentOS 4, and I'd prefer > >> to use 5. > >> > > > > > > I have a sense of deja-vu. Didn't we have all these questions and specs > > a couple of weeks ago? > > That was more about something that scaled up. For 15 people I'd > probably run SME server in a VMware guest on a machine doing something > else. And handle the high availablity by having the host use RAID1 on > swappable disks that could be moved to a spare chassis. > > -- > Les Mikesell >lesmikes...@gmail.com > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > Pfsense supports CARP which can be used for failover. FreeNAS/Openfiler(CentOS) can be used for file sharing and it supports RAID also. and you can use KVM on CentOS to run all of them(VMs) including a VM which can use Zimbra or any other groupware software you want. -- "It is human nature to think wisely and act in an absurd fashion." "Todo el desorden del mundo proviene de las profesiones mal o mediocremente servidas" ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Using cdrecord on CentOS
At Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:46:20 +0200 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Michael A. Peters a écrit : > > >> > >> 1) Am I supposed to be root to use cdrecord and burn an .iso file? > > > > I've found it works much better if you are root. > > > > I tried both, and see: cdrecord complains about not being able to set > certain priorities while being run as user, which induces a high risk > for buffer underruns. So I have my answer for that. > > Another cdrecord-related question. Usually I should be able to copy a CD > as simply as that: > > $ dd if=/dev/cdrom of=copy.iso > > Then insert a blank CD, and: > > $ cdrecord -v -eject dev=/dev/cdrom copy.iso > > Now I did that for data CDs, and it works very well. I thought, normally > this *should* also work for audio CDs, so I gave that a spin. But > everytime I try it, dd stops short and gives me an "Input/output error" > for /dev/hdc. While dd *can* be used to copy single-track data CDs, it is better to use the readcd program (comes with the cdrecord package). For audio CDs, the cdda2wav program would be a better option. > > I tried three different audio CDs, all three in good state. I can listen > to them OK on the PC. But all I get with dd is a zero-byte-length > copy.iso file. An audio CD is not like a data CD. It does not have a 'file system'. It is a collection of data tracks, containing cdda files. > > Any idea what's happening? > > Niki > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 Deepwoods Software-- Download the Model Railroad System http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows hel...@deepsoft.com -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 10:08 +0200, Sorin Srbu wrote: > >-Original Message- > >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf > >Of Michael A. Peters > >Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 5:57 PM > >To: CentOS mailing list > >Subject: Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers > > > >> Strangely enough, only the systems running an Amd cpu gives the screen > >> artefacts. Go figure... > > > >What the artifacts? > >I switched to the DKMS module in rpmforge and am running an AMD CPU. > >Only think I've noticed is a weird issue with the cursor in thunderbird, > >I don't know if that is nvidia related or not though. It is annoying and > >I don't recall it being there before I updated the driver. > > Diagonal thin black lines originating from upper left corner for starters. > Then if I open a gui, whatever sort, that window gets those lines too. Menus > are unreadable because of this, but slightly more readable if I move the > mouse pointer over the menu entry. The lines tend to go away for a short > while if I log off and log on again. Weird thing is that the lines are > always diagonal and tend to always originate from the upper left corner of > whatever window. > > This is with gnome mind you, and *supposedly* this one is the most stable of > all the desktop environments. Haven't tried with KDE and xfce. Can't tell > for sure if it's gnome or the Nvidia drivers specifically, but I'm leaning > towards the drivers. > > It's not a hardware issue, as I've run rhel3 on the same machines w/o any > artifacts. > > The hardware's two-three year old Asus mobo with a single-core AMD x64 and a > rather feisty Nvidia Quadra gfx card. Don't have the exact details right > now, but it should give a hint or two. All the P4-machines, as well as the > i7-boxes, seem to work fine with dkms. --- No none of that is hardware issues. It is issues with the Nvidia Driver it self. Some or all of those issues can be solved by Downgrading the driver it self. All this is in the documentation and are known problems on both Linux and Windows. JohnStanley ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] looking for alternative to SME & Clark Connect
Rainer Duffner wrote: > >> - if possible fail-over / high availability support. >> >> > > > For free? > ;-) > > >> I need to support about 15 - 30 (some part time) students, so I would >> like to keep the costs low. If it's free, so much better. SME works >> for most of the stuff, but it still runs on CentOS 4, and I'd prefer >> to use 5. >> > > > I have a sense of deja-vu. Didn't we have all these questions and specs > a couple of weeks ago? That was more about something that scaled up. For 15 people I'd probably run SME server in a VMware guest on a machine doing something else. And handle the high availablity by having the host use RAID1 on swappable disks that could be moved to a spare chassis. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Using cdrecord on CentOS
From: Niki Kovacs > > Couldn't it be the copy protection...? > In theory, dd should also take care of copying the copy protection, > isn't it? I think I am confusing with something else. The trick they used was to put errors. It would still play with hifi players (error correction codes), but would fail on PCs... I guess it is not the case since you can listen to them on your PC. So ignore me... ^_^ JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] looking for alternative to SME & Clark Connect
Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm looking for a (preferably free) alternative to SME / Clark Connect. > > I basically need the following: > - firewall > - nat > - VPN > - bandwidth limiting / monitoring > - email (SMTP / POP3 / IMAP) & groupware > - file & printer sharing > - RAID support > - if possible fail-over / high availability support. > > I need to support about 15 - 30 (some part time) students, so I would > like to keep the costs low. If it's free, so much better. SME works > for most of the stuff, but it still runs on CentOS 4, and I'd prefer > to use 5. What's the problem with clarkconnect? It's not particularly difficult to set these functions up yourself starting with a stock Centos if you intend to maintain them yourself (SME's main attraction is that the configuration interface is easy enough for anyone to use). With other appliance-type distributions you might find it easier to split the firewall and application services onto different boxes. ipcop and ebox look somewhat promising. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Using cdrecord on CentOS
John Doe a écrit : > > Couldn't it be the copy protection...? In theory, dd should also take care of copying the copy protection, isn't it? :o) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Sharing RAM between VM
Larry wrote: > Thank you, for all your answers! > > What about the other question? Can clustering help in completing this > task? I thought cluster nodes are sharing RAM on default ( obviously I > was wrong). Depends what your goal is, if you want to run a cluster with shared memory between systems, you typically need a very high speed interconnect and very low latencies, your not likely to achieve this within VMs. Your original message just talked about sharing ram between VMs, you didn't mention why you were specifically interested in doing that. > nate, which vmware you use? VMware ESXi or VMWare Server or something > else? Whenever possible I'd use ESXi, I happen to use vmware server on the system that is sending my email because it's old and ESXi doesn't support the 3ware 8006-2 SATA card in it. Check the hardware compatibility list, the list is fairly short for some things like SATA, though ESX 4 is due out in the coming week(s) which is supposed to dramatically improve SATA support. Note that out of the box ESXi(with the free license) doesn't support snapshots or cold migrations(between servers) at least last time I checked the feature comparisons sheet. I'll be installing about 12 new ESXi systems soon. VMware server does not support page sharing or memory ballooning, and does support snapshots. I use vmware server 1.x, probably will go to 2.x in the next couple months. > p.s. Stable xen, has ballooning. You can say for every VM: > memory=1024MB, max-mem=2048MB. And you can tweak the memory "manually", > without having to restart the VM and without any other problems. That's not memory ballooning, at least not in the vmware world, and you can do the same in vmware, though if you decide to drop the amount of physical memory allocated to the guest without having the guest free up that memory you'll go into swap pretty quick, so it's not a practice I do, really ever. If Xen has a specific balloon driver like vmware and inflates the balloon when you change the memory settings that would be pretty cool, as far as I know vmware does not do that, the balloon only kicks in when host memory is low, not when you decide you want to resize the guest. nate ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] looking for alternative to SME & Clark Connect
Rudi Ahlers schrieb: > Hi all, > > I'm looking for a (preferably free) alternative to SME / Clark Connect. > > I basically need the following: > - firewall > - nat > - VPN > - bandwidth limiting / monitoring > I'd split these functions to a separate device, using pfSense on embedded hardware (ALIX or comparable). They have no point on a server. pfSense does this on 200 $-size hardware with 5 Watt energy consumption. > - email (SMTP / POP3 / IMAP) & groupware > - file & printer sharing > - RAID support > I don't think there's a free version for everything ;-) Zimbra is OK, but the commercial edition costs - same with OX and most other stuff. Given the complexity of the stuff involved, I'd say anything like this needs a commercial backer. Unless you only use mail. > - if possible fail-over / high availability support. > > For free? ;-) > I need to support about 15 - 30 (some part time) students, so I would > like to keep the costs low. If it's free, so much better. SME works > for most of the stuff, but it still runs on CentOS 4, and I'd prefer > to use 5. > I have a sense of deja-vu. Didn't we have all these questions and specs a couple of weeks ago? Rainer ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Using cdrecord on CentOS
From: Niki Kovacs > Now I did that for data CDs, and it works very well. I thought, normally > this *should* also work for audio CDs, so I gave that a spin. But > everytime I try it, dd stops short and gives me an "Input/output error" > for /dev/hdc. Couldn't it be the copy protection...? JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Can not get IP address
Anand Vaddarapu a écrit : > Hi, > > while installing centos 5.2 i enabled dhcp. centos machine did not get > IP address and can not get to internet. > > ifconfig results > Link encap:Local Loopback > inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.255.255.0 > inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host > UP Loopback RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 > RX packets:1251 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:212517 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 What is your internet connection? If it is cable modem, reset your modem and try again. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Using cdrecord on CentOS
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 10:45 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote: > On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 15:46 +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote: > > Michael A. Peters a écrit : > > > > >> > > >> 1) Am I supposed to be root to use cdrecord and burn an .iso file? > > > > > > I've found it works much better if you are root. > > > > > > > I tried both, and see: cdrecord complains about not being able to set > > certain priorities while being run as user, which induces a high risk > > for buffer underruns. So I have my answer for that. > > > > Another cdrecord-related question. Usually I should be able to copy a CD > > as simply as that: > > > > $ dd if=/dev/cdrom of=copy.iso > > > > Then insert a blank CD, and: > > > > $ cdrecord -v -eject dev=/dev/cdrom copy.iso > > > > Now I did that for data CDs, and it works very well. I thought, normally > > this *should* also work for audio CDs, so I gave that a spin. But > > everytime I try it, dd stops short and gives me an "Input/output error" > > for /dev/hdc. > > > > I tried three different audio CDs, all three in good state. I can listen > > to them OK on the PC. But all I get with dd is a zero-byte-length > > copy.iso file. > > > > Any idea what's happening? > > Try padding copied image with a few hundred k of nulls. > > dd if=/dev/zero of=copy.iso \ > seek= bs=2048 OOPS! Forgot to limit the output. Add count= to the end of the command. > > -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] looking for alternative to SME & Clark Connect
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm looking for a (preferably free) alternative to SME / Clark Connect. > > I basically need the following: > - firewall > - nat > - VPN > - bandwidth limiting / monitoring > - email (SMTP / POP3 / IMAP) & groupware > - file & printer sharing > - RAID support > - if possible fail-over / high availability support. > > I need to support about 15 - 30 (some part time) students, so I would > like to keep the costs low. If it's free, so much better. SME works > for most of the stuff, but it still runs on CentOS 4, and I'd prefer > to use 5. > > Any recommendations? > > -- > > Kind Regards > Rudi Ahlers > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > Pfsense(FreeBSD based) can be an alternative, although it doesn't support email/groupware out of the box...but it doesn't mean that it can't be done. http://www.pfsense.org I've been running it on a Dell Optiplex PIII for almost 2 years without any issue using NAT, Port Fowarding, Dual WAN(Cable and ADSL), Captive portal, DNS Server, Snort, etc. hope it helps. -- "It is human nature to think wisely and act in an absurd fashion." "Todo el desorden del mundo proviene de las profesiones mal o mediocremente servidas" ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] re-install package
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009, Erik Laxdal wrote: > Jerry Geis wrote: >> I tried to install alsa 1.0.19 on centos 5.3 64 - did not work - compile >> errors. >> >> I need to re-install alsa-lib and alsa-util . >> I dont want to do rpm -e first on those packages as dependcy is crazy. >> I know they were installed (rpm -qa | grep alsa tells me so) I just want >> to re-install ? >> How do I do that? > > Try the new "reinstall" option in CentOS 5.3's version of yum: > > yum reinstall alsa-lib alsa-util Finally ! 10 years after apt :) -- -- dag wieers, d...@centos.org, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Using cdrecord on CentOS
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 15:46 +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote: > Michael A. Peters a écrit : > > >> > >> 1) Am I supposed to be root to use cdrecord and burn an .iso file? > > > > I've found it works much better if you are root. > > > > I tried both, and see: cdrecord complains about not being able to set > certain priorities while being run as user, which induces a high risk > for buffer underruns. So I have my answer for that. > > Another cdrecord-related question. Usually I should be able to copy a CD > as simply as that: > > $ dd if=/dev/cdrom of=copy.iso > > Then insert a blank CD, and: > > $ cdrecord -v -eject dev=/dev/cdrom copy.iso > > Now I did that for data CDs, and it works very well. I thought, normally > this *should* also work for audio CDs, so I gave that a spin. But > everytime I try it, dd stops short and gives me an "Input/output error" > for /dev/hdc. > > I tried three different audio CDs, all three in good state. I can listen > to them OK on the PC. But all I get with dd is a zero-byte-length > copy.iso file. > > Any idea what's happening? Try padding copied image with a few hundred k of nulls. dd if=/dev/zero of=copy.iso \ seek= bs=2048 I've had to do this for my ISO images depending on the age/brand/model of the device. It seems that (at least in the past) there was a disconnect in the kernel handling of the end of file and writing the last blocks read in. This cured it. I can't say if this would affect audio CDs as well, but worth a try. > > Niki > HTH -- Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] looking for alternative to SME & Clark Connect
Hi all, I'm looking for a (preferably free) alternative to SME / Clark Connect. I basically need the following: - firewall - nat - VPN - bandwidth limiting / monitoring - email (SMTP / POP3 / IMAP) & groupware - file & printer sharing - RAID support - if possible fail-over / high availability support. I need to support about 15 - 30 (some part time) students, so I would like to keep the costs low. If it's free, so much better. SME works for most of the stuff, but it still runs on CentOS 4, and I'd prefer to use 5. Any recommendations? -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Using cdrecord on CentOS
Michael A. Peters a écrit : >> >> 1) Am I supposed to be root to use cdrecord and burn an .iso file? > > I've found it works much better if you are root. > I tried both, and see: cdrecord complains about not being able to set certain priorities while being run as user, which induces a high risk for buffer underruns. So I have my answer for that. Another cdrecord-related question. Usually I should be able to copy a CD as simply as that: $ dd if=/dev/cdrom of=copy.iso Then insert a blank CD, and: $ cdrecord -v -eject dev=/dev/cdrom copy.iso Now I did that for data CDs, and it works very well. I thought, normally this *should* also work for audio CDs, so I gave that a spin. But everytime I try it, dd stops short and gives me an "Input/output error" for /dev/hdc. I tried three different audio CDs, all three in good state. I can listen to them OK on the PC. But all I get with dd is a zero-byte-length copy.iso file. Any idea what's happening? Niki ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Many missing updates for CentOS 4?
Tom G. Christensen wrote: > According to centos-announce there's been no updates for CentOS 4 > i386/x86_64 since the seamonkey errata (CESA-2009:0325) on 2009-03-06. ... > Is there any work being done on these? Yes, Tru and I are going to fix this issue today, also over the next few days try and get the centos-4 updates going through the same process as the centos-5 updates do now. Which should mean we can get back into the target of < 24hrs from upstream. - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] rt3 3.8.2 latest version as rpm for C5?
Rainer Traut wrote on Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:54:57 +0200: > >> I really do not want to install f10. :O > > > > You could run it in a VM. > > Yeah, but that means installing after all... :D Right, right, it sounded like you were contemplating to replace the bare metal OS and didn't like that ... Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers
>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Alfred von Campe >Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 7:51 PM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers > >FWIW, I don't use DKMS but this homegrown script instead. I put >whatever version of the driver I want to deploy (currently NVIDIA- >Linux-x86-180.44-pkg1.run) in a network accessible location and >create a link named NVIDIA-Linux-x86-latest to it. The script then >handles the rest. You still need to be root to do this, right? Seems nifty in any case. Thanks! -- /Sorin smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers
>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Michael A. Peters >Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 5:57 PM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] DKMS and new(er) Nvidia-drivers > >> Strangely enough, only the systems running an Amd cpu gives the screen >> artefacts. Go figure... > >What the artifacts? >I switched to the DKMS module in rpmforge and am running an AMD CPU. >Only think I've noticed is a weird issue with the cursor in thunderbird, >I don't know if that is nvidia related or not though. It is annoying and >I don't recall it being there before I updated the driver. Diagonal thin black lines originating from upper left corner for starters. Then if I open a gui, whatever sort, that window gets those lines too. Menus are unreadable because of this, but slightly more readable if I move the mouse pointer over the menu entry. The lines tend to go away for a short while if I log off and log on again. Weird thing is that the lines are always diagonal and tend to always originate from the upper left corner of whatever window. This is with gnome mind you, and *supposedly* this one is the most stable of all the desktop environments. Haven't tried with KDE and xfce. Can't tell for sure if it's gnome or the Nvidia drivers specifically, but I'm leaning towards the drivers. It's not a hardware issue, as I've run rhel3 on the same machines w/o any artifacts. The hardware's two-three year old Asus mobo with a single-core AMD x64 and a rather feisty Nvidia Quadra gfx card. Don't have the exact details right now, but it should give a hint or two. All the P4-machines, as well as the i7-boxes, seem to work fine with dkms. -- /Sorin smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] rt3 3.8.2 latest version as rpm for C5?
Am 15.04.2009 02:12, schrieb Jim Perrin: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:07 AM, Rainer Traut wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I know, epel has rt3 in version 3.6.x. >> And - sadly - for version 3.8.x the perl module dependencies are way >> ahead of what I can find in epel or rpmforge. >> But we really need some of the 3.8.x series features. >> >> So has anybody maybe built those modules + rt3 v3.8.x for C5? >> Any hint? > > I started to run down this rabbit hole and had most of it built via > mock and one of dag's cpan-> rpm scripts. After a few rounds of > builds, it became immediately apparent that some of the requirements > directly conflict with the perl rpm shipped by centos and RHEL. > Specifically the Encode bits required by RT 3.8 are much newer than > what is provided in the centos perl rpm. I wasn't willing to do that > level of replacement when building RT because I didn't need the > feature sets in 3.8 and I wasn't aware of what else that might impact > for other users. Ok thanks, I will install f10 in a VM and probably save much troble... Rainer ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] rt3 3.8.2 latest version as rpm for C5?
Am 14.04.2009 19:31, schrieb Kai Schaetzl: > Rainer Traut wrote on Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:07:23 +0200: > >> I really do not want to install f10. :O > > You could run it in a VM. Yeah, but that means installing after all... :D But I will do that, thx for your answer. Rainer ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Sharing RAM between VM
Thank you, for all your answers! What about the other question? Can clustering help in completing this task? I thought cluster nodes are sharing RAM on default ( obviously I was wrong). >From your answers I'm getting to think that best decision for this task, in my case, is to buy some RAM. I'm not going to make more VMs. Their number will stay constant. nate, which vmware you use? VMware ESXi or VMWare Server or something else? Thanks, again for your help! p.s. Stable xen, has ballooning. You can say for every VM: memory=1024MB, max-mem=2048MB. And you can tweak the memory "manually", without having to restart the VM and without any other problems. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Many missing updates for CentOS 4?
According to centos-announce there's been no updates for CentOS 4 i386/x86_64 since the seamonkey errata (CESA-2009:0325) on 2009-03-06. A quick rundown shows a rather worrying backlog of missing security updates, some more than a month old: 2009:0313 - Moderate: wireshark 2009:0333 - Moderate: libpng/libpng10 2009:0331 - Important: kernel 2009:0344 - Moderate: libsoup 2009:0354 - Moderate: evolution-data-server 2009:0355 - Moderate: evolution and evolution-data-server 2009:0341 - Moderate: curl 2009:0345 - Moderate: ghostscript (superceded by 2009:0420) 2009:0258 - Moderate: thunderbird 2009:0362 - Moderate: NetworkManager 2009:0373 - Moderate: systemtap 2009:0397 - Critical: firefox 2009:0398 - Critical: seamonkey 2009:0337 - Moderate: php 2009:0409 - Important: krb5 2009:0411 - Moderate: device-mapper-multipath 2009:0420 - Moderate: ghostscript Is there any work being done on these? -tgc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
